پرش به محتوا

Romans 9:20

“The Justice of God's Sovereign Choice”· Romans 9:14–24Read in context
King James Version
Nay but, O man, who art thou that repliest against God? Shall the thing formed say to him that formed it, Why hast thou made me thus?
KJV (with Strong's)
Nay but G3304, O G5599 man G444, who G5101 art G1488 thou G4771 that repliest against G470 God G2316?G3361 Shall G2046 the thing formed G4110 say G2046 to him that formed G4111 it, Why G5101 hast thou made G4160 me G3165 thus G3779?
Complete Jewish Bible
Who are you, a mere human being, to talk back to God? Will what is formed say to him who formed it, “Why did you make me this way?”
Berean Standard Bible
But who are you, O man, to talk back to God? Shall what is formed say to Him who formed it, “Why did You make me like this?”
American Standard Version
Nay but, O man, who art thou that repliest against God? Shall the thing formed say to him that formed it, Why didst thou make me thus?
World English Bible Messianic
But indeed, O man, who are you to reply against God? Will the thing formed ask him who formed it, “Why did you make me like this?”
Geneva Bible (1599)
But, O man, who art thou which pleadest against God? shall the thing formed say to him that formed it, Why hast thou made me thus?
Young's Literal Translation
nay, but, O man, who art thou that art answering again to God? shall the thing formed say to Him who did form it , Why me didst thou make thus?
فارسی · OPV
نی بلکه تو کیستی ای انسان که با خدا معارضه می‌کنی؟ آیا مصنوع به صانع می‌گوید که چرا مرا چنین ساختی؟
Translation
See on the biblical-era map
In the KJVVerse 28,176 of 31,102 · 90.6%

Study this verse

Summary

Romans 9:20 presents a profound rhetorical challenge from the Apostle Paul, forcefully rebuking any human presumption to question God's sovereign choices. Situated within a complex theological discourse on divine election and God's dealings with Israel and the Gentiles, this verse employs the ancient metaphor of a potter and clay to underscore the Creator's absolute authority and the creature's inherent lack of standing to dispute its Maker's design or purpose. It calls humanity to a posture of humble submission before the unsearchable wisdom and righteous prerogative of God.

Context

Literary Context

This verse is a pivotal moment in Paul's intense theological argument in Romans chapters 9-11. Paul is grappling with the apparent paradox of God's faithfulness to His covenant people, Israel, despite their widespread rejection of Jesus as Messiah. Following his affirmations of God's unconditional election in Romans 9:6-13, Paul anticipates a human objection to God's justice or fairness, asking, "Is there injustice on God's part?" (Romans 9:14). He immediately refutes this by citing God's declaration to Moses, "I will have mercy on whom I have mercy, and I will have compassion on whom I have compassion" (Romans 9:15), and His dealings with Pharaoh, whom He raised up to demonstrate His power (Romans 9:17). Romans 9:18-19 then concludes that God has mercy on whom He wills and hardens whom He wills, directly leading to the hypothetical human retort, "Why then does he still find fault? For who can resist his will?" to which Romans 9:20 is Paul's indignant and powerful response.

Historical & Cultural Context

Paul's audience in Rome included both Jewish and Gentile believers, and the question of Israel's status and God's faithfulness was a pressing one. The concept of God as a "potter" and humanity as "clay" was a common and well-understood metaphor in ancient Near Eastern thought, particularly within Jewish prophetic tradition. This imagery, found extensively in the Old Testament (e.g., Isaiah 29:16, Isaiah 45:9, Isaiah 64:8, Jeremiah 18:1-6), conveyed the absolute sovereignty of the creator over his creation. A potter had unquestionable rights over the clay to fashion it as he pleased, for any purpose. This cultural understanding would have immediately resonated with Paul's readers, reinforcing the vast, unbridgeable chasm between the divine Creator and His human creation.

Key Themes

This verse powerfully contributes to several overarching themes in Romans. Firstly, Divine Sovereignty is emphatically asserted, highlighting God's absolute and unquestionable authority as the Creator who is not subject to human scrutiny or judgment regarding His purposes or actions. Secondly, the Creator-Creature Distinction is sharply drawn, emphasizing the infinite qualitative difference between God, the all-wise and all-powerful Former, and humanity, the dependent "thing formed." The created has no inherent right or capacity to challenge its Maker's design. Thirdly, the verse calls for Human Humility, serving as a sharp rebuke to human arrogance that presumes to sit in judgment over God's ways. It compels believers to acknowledge their finite nature and to embrace a posture of trust and submission before God's incomprehensible wisdom and power, as further explored in Romans 11:33-36.

Exposition and Analysis

Key Word Analysis

repliest against antapokrínomai' G470

This word (G470) means "to contradict or dispute," or "to answer back." Paul uses it to describe an impudent or argumentative response to an authority. In this context, it emphasizes the audacity of a human challenging God's divine prerogative and wisdom, highlighting the impropriety of such a challenge from the created to the Creator. It suggests a contentious, confrontational answering back, rather than a humble inquiry.

thing formed plásma' G4110

Derived from the verb "to mould," this term (G4110) refers to something shaped or fabricated, specifically "something moulded." It directly evokes the imagery of clay in the hands of a potter, emphasizing the complete dependence and subservience of the created object to its maker. It underscores humanity's status as a product of God's design, not an independent entity with rights to question its fundamental nature or purpose.

him that formed plássō' G4111

This primary verb (G4111) means "to mould, i.e., shape or fabricate." It identifies God as the ultimate artisan, the one who actively shapes and designs. When contrasted with "thing formed," it highlights God's absolute creative power, authority, and discretion over His creation, leaving no room for the created to dictate terms or question His work. The participle form emphasizes God as the active agent, the one who does the forming.

Verse Breakdown

"Nay but, O man, who art thou that repliest against God?"

This opening serves as a sharp, indignant rebuke. "Nay but" (G3304, menoûnge) is a strong interjection, expressing emphatic disagreement with a presumed objection. The address "O man" (G5599, ō G444, ánthrōpos) is a direct, confrontational challenge to any human who dares to question God's sovereign will. The rhetorical question "who art thou that repliest against God?" (G5101, tís G4771, G470, antapokrínomai G2316, theós) underscores the immense disparity between the finite, created human and the infinite, omnipotent Creator. It asserts that a creature has no standing or authority to dispute the actions or decisions of its Maker.

"Shall the thing formed say to him that formed [it], Why hast thou made me thus?"

This second rhetorical question expands on the first, drawing on the well-known Old Testament metaphor of the potter and the clay. "The thing formed" (G4110, plásma) represents humanity, the creation, while "him that formed" (G4111, plássō) refers to God, the Creator. The question "Why hast thou made me thus?" (G5101, tís G4160, poiéō G3165, G3779, hoútō) implies a challenge to God's wisdom, purpose, or even justice in His creative acts. Paul uses this imagery to powerfully assert God's absolute right to shape His creation according to His own will and purpose, without being accountable to the creation itself. It is an argument from inherent authority and design.

Literary Devices

Romans 9:20 is rich in literary devices that amplify its forceful message. The primary device is the Rhetorical Question, used twice to challenge the reader's assumptions and lead them to an undeniable conclusion. Paul does not expect an answer but uses the questions to make a powerful assertion: no human has the right to question God's sovereignty. The verse also employs a vivid Analogy (or Metaphor) of the potter and the clay, a common Old Testament image. This analogy effectively illustrates the Creator-creature distinction, emphasizing God's absolute power and discretion over His creation, just as a potter has complete control over the clay. The direct address "O man" is an example of Apostrophe, where Paul directly addresses a hypothetical objector, making his rebuke more personal and impactful. The indignant tone conveyed by "Nay but" further enhances the dramatic effect, underscoring the audacity of the imagined challenge to God.

Theological and Thematic Connections

Romans 9:20 stands as a foundational text for understanding the absolute sovereignty of God in His creative and redemptive purposes. It asserts that God, as the Creator, possesses an inherent and unquestionable right to act according to His own will, wisdom, and good pleasure, without being accountable to His creation. This does not imply arbitrariness, but rather an ultimate, unchallengeable authority rooted in His divine nature. The verse challenges any human attempt to impose human standards of justice or fairness upon God, reminding us that His ways are higher than our ways, and His thoughts than our thoughts. It underscores the theological truth that God's plan is perfect and righteous, even when it transcends human comprehension, demanding a posture of profound humility and trust from all who are His creation.

Reflection and Application

Romans 9:20 calls believers to a profound posture of trust, humility, and submission before God. In a world that often prizes individual autonomy and questions all authority, this verse serves as a powerful reminder of our place as created beings. It challenges us to relinquish our desire to dictate terms to God or to fully comprehend His infinite wisdom. Instead, it invites us to rest in the assurance that God's plan, though sometimes mysterious and beyond our full grasp, is always perfect, just, and ultimately for His glory. This means embracing the reality that God is God, and we are not. Our highest calling is not to understand every "why" but to trust the "Who" behind all creation and providence, knowing that His character is good and His purposes are righteous. Such submission leads to true peace and freedom from the burden of trying to manage or judge the divine.

Questions for Reflection

  1. In what areas of my life do I tend to "reply against God" or question His wisdom and sovereignty?
  2. How does the analogy of the potter and the clay deepen my understanding of God's absolute authority and my dependence on Him?
  3. What specific steps can I take to cultivate a greater sense of humility and trust in God's sovereign will, even when I don't understand His ways?
  4. How might embracing the truth of Romans 9:20 impact my prayers, my expectations, and my response to difficult circumstances?

FAQ

Does Romans 9:20 imply that God is arbitrary or unjust in His dealings with humanity?

No, Romans 9:20 does not imply that God is arbitrary or unjust. Instead, it asserts God's absolute sovereignty and His inherent right as Creator to act according to His own perfect wisdom and righteous character. Paul's argument in Romans 9 is not that God is capricious, but that His justice and mercy operate on a divine scale that transcends human comprehension and judgment. The rhetorical question "who art thou that repliest against God?" is a rebuke to human presumption, not an admission of divine caprice. God's actions are always consistent with His holy and loving nature, even when we, as finite creatures, cannot fully grasp the reasons behind them. The verse reminds us that the created cannot impose its standards of fairness on the Creator.

How does the "potter and clay" metaphor in Romans 9:20 relate to human free will?

The "potter and clay" metaphor primarily emphasizes God's absolute sovereignty and His creative prerogative, rather than directly addressing the complexities of human free will. Paul uses this imagery to assert God's right to shape and use His creation for His own purposes, whether for "vessels of wrath prepared for destruction" or "vessels of mercy, which he had prepared beforehand for glory" (Romans 9:22-23). While the passage highlights God's ultimate control, it does not negate human responsibility or decision-making. The Bible consistently presents both divine sovereignty and human responsibility as true, though the exact relationship is a profound theological mystery. The point of Romans 9:20 is that the creature has no standing to challenge the Creator's fundamental right to form and purpose His creation.

Christ-Centered Fulfillment

While Romans 9:20 directly addresses God's sovereign right as Creator over His creation, its Christ-centered fulfillment is found in understanding that God's ultimate purpose in His sovereign choices culminates in Jesus Christ. The "thing formed" that has no right to question its Maker finds its perfect embodiment of humility and obedience in Christ, who, "though he was in the form of God, did not count equality with God a thing to be grasped, but emptied himself, by taking the form of a servant, being born in the likeness of men" (Philippians 2:6-7). Jesus, the Son, perfectly submitted to the Father's will, even to the point of death on a cross (Philippians 2:8). Furthermore, Christ Himself is the ultimate "thing formed" in a unique sense—the "new creation" (2 Corinthians 5:17) and the "firstborn of all creation" (Colossians 1:15), through whom all things were made (John 1:3). God's sovereign purpose, which Paul defends in Romans 9, is ultimately to gather all things in Christ (Ephesians 1:10) and to display His glory through the "vessels of mercy" redeemed by Christ's sacrifice. Thus, the unchallengeable authority of the Potter is perfectly demonstrated and fulfilled in the person and work of the Son, who perfectly embodies humility and perfect obedience to the Father's sovereign design.

Copy as

Public-domain commentary

Matthew Henry

From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry comments on passages, not single verses — this entry covers Romans 9:14–24. His three-level outline is real structure in the source text, so it is rendered as structure.

1662–1714 · 11 verses
Passage under commentRomans 9:14–24
I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points(1.) (2.) Details

The apostle, having asserted the true meaning of the promise, comes here to maintain and prove the absolute sovereignty of God, in disposing of the children of men, with reference to their eternal state. And herein God is to be considered, not as a rector and governor, distributing rewards and punishments according to his revealed laws and covenants, but as an owner and benefactor, giving to the children of men such grace and favour as he has determined in and by his secret and eternal will and counsel: both the favour of visible church-membership and privileges, which is given to some people and denied to others, and the favour of effectual grace, which is given to some particular persons and denied to others.

Now this part of his discourse is in answer to two objections.

I.It might be objected, Is there unrighteousness with God? If God, in dealing with the children of men, do thus, in an arbitrary manner, choose some and refuse others, may it not be suspected that there is unrighteousness with him? This the apostle startles at the thought of: God forbid! Far be it from us to think such a thing; shall not the judge of all the earth do right? Gen 18:25; Rom 3:5, Rom 3:6. He denies the consequences, and proves the denial.

1.In respect of those to whom he shows mercy, Rom 9:15, Rom 9:16. He quotes that scripture to show God's sovereignty in dispensing his favours (Exo 33:19): I will be gracious to whom I will be gracious. All God's reasons of mercy are taken from within himself. All the children of men being plunged alike into a state of sin and misery, equally under guilt and wrath, God, in a way of sovereignty, picks out some from this fallen apostatized race, to be vessels of grace and glory. He dispenses his gifts to whom he will, without giving us any reason: according to his own good pleasure he pitches upon some to be monuments of mercy and grace, preventing grace, effectual grace, while he passes by others. The expression is very emphatic, and the repetition makes it more so: I will have mercy on whom I will have mercy. It imports a perfect absoluteness in God's will; he will do what he will, and giveth not account of any of his matters, nor is it fit he should. As these great words, I am that I am (Exo 3:14) do abundantly express the absolute independency of his being, so these words, I will have mercy on whom I will have mercy, do as fully express the absolute prerogative and sovereignty of his will. To vindicate the righteousness of God, in showing mercy to whom he will, the apostle appeals to that which God himself had spoken, wherein he claims this sovereign power and liberty. God is a competent judge, even in his own case. Whatsoever God does, or is resolved to do, is both by the one and the other proved to be just. Eleēsō on han heleō - I will have mercy on whom I will have mercy. When I begin, I will make an end. Therefore God's mercy endures for ever, because the reason of it is fetched from within himself; therefore his gifts and callings are without repentance. Hence he infers (Rom 9:16), It is not of him that willeth. Whatever good comes from God to man, the glory of it is not to be ascribed to the most generous desire, nor to the most industrious endeavour, of man, but only and purely to the free grace and mercy of God. In Jacob's case it was not of him that willeth, nor of him that runneth; it was not the earnest will and desire of Rebecca that Jacob might have the blessing; it was not Jacob's haste to get it (for he was compelled to run for it) that procured him the blessing, but only the mercy and grace of God. Wherein the holy happy people of God differ from other people, it is God and his grace that make them differ. Applying this general rule to the particular case that Paul has before him, the reason why the unworthy, undeserving, ill-deserving Gentiles are called, and grafted into the church, while the greatest part of the Jews are left to perish in unbelief, is not because those Gentiles were better deserving or better disposed for such a favour, but because of God's free grace that made that difference. The Gentiles did neither will it, nor run for it, for they sat in darkness, Mat 4:16. In darkness, therefore not willing what they knew not; sitting in darkness, a contented posture, therefore not running to meet it, but anticipated with these invaluable blessings of goodness. Such is the method of God's grace towards all that partake of it, for he is found of those that sought him not (Isa 65:1); in this preventing, effectual, distinguishing grace, he acts as a benefactor, whose grace is his own. Our eye therefore must not be evil because his is good; but, of all the grace that we or others have, he must have the glory: Not unto us, Psa 115:1.

2.In respect of those who perish, Rom 9:17. God's sovereignty, manifested in the ruin of sinners, is here discovered in the instance of Pharaoh; it is quoted from Exo 9:16. Observe,

(1.)What God did with Pharaoh. He raised him up, brought him into the world, made him famous, gave him the kingdom and power, - set him up as a beacon upon a hill, as the mark of all his plagues (compare Exo 9:14) - hardened his heart, as he had said he would (Exo 4:21): I will harden his heart, that is, withdraw softening grace, leave him to himself, let Satan loose against him, and lay hardening providences before him. Or, by raising him up may be meant the intermission of the plagues which gave Pharaoh respite, and the reprieve of Pharaoh in those plagues. In the Hebrew, I have made thee stand, continued thee yet in the land of the living. Thus doth God raise up sinners, make them for himself, even for the day of evil (Pro 16:4), raise them up in outward prosperity, external privileges (Mat 11:23), sparing mercies.

(2.)What he designed in it: That I might show my power in thee. God would, by all this, serve the honour of his name, and manifest his power in baffling the pride and insolence of that great and daring tyrant, who bade defiance to Heaven itself, and trampled upon all that was just and sacred. If Pharaoh had not been so high and might, so bold and hardy, the power of God had not been so illustrious in the ruining of him; but the taking off of the spirit of such a prince, who hectored at that rate, did indeed proclaim God glorious in holiness, fearful in praises, doing wonders, Exo 15:11. This is Pharaoh, and all his multitude.

(3.)His conclusion concerning both these we have, Rom 9:18. He hath mercy on whom he will have mercy, and whom he will he hardeneth. The various dealings of God, by which he makes some to differ from others, must be resolved into his absolute sovereignty. He is debtor to no man, his grace is his own, and he may give it or withhold it as it pleaseth him; we have none of us deserved it, nay, we have all justly forfeited it a thousand times, so that herein the work of our salvation is admirably well ordered that those who are saved must thank God only, and those who perish must thank themselves only, Hos 13:9. We are bound, as God hath bound us, to do our utmost for the salvation of all we have to do with; but God is bound no further than he has been pleased to bind himself by his own covenant and promise, which is his revealed will; and that is that he will receive, and not cast out, those that come to Christ; but the drawing of souls in order to that coming is a preventing distinguishing favour to whom he will. Had he mercy on the Gentiles? It was because he would have mercy on them. Were the Jews hardened? It was because it was his own pleasure to deny them softening grace, and to give them up to their chosen affected unbelief. Even so, Father, because it seemed good unto thee. That scripture excellently explains this, Luk 10:21, and, as this, shows the sovereign will of God in giving or withholding both the means of grace and the effectual blessing upon those means.

II.It might be objected, Why doth he yet find fault? For who hath resisted his will? Rom 9:19.

Had the apostle been arguing only for God's sovereignty in appointing and ordering the terms and conditions of acceptance and salvation, there had not been the least colour for this objection; for he might well find fault if people refused to come up to the terms on which such a salvation is offered; the salvation being so great, the terms could not be hard. But there might be colour for the objection against his arguing for the sovereignty of God in giving and withholding differencing and preventing grace; and the objection is commonly and readily advanced against the doctrine of distinguishing grace. If God, while he gives effectual grace to some, denies it to others, why doth he find fault with those to whom he denies it? If he hath rejected the Jews, and hid from their eyes the things that belong to their peace, why doth he find fault with them for their blindness? If it be his pleasure to discard them as not a people, and not obtaining mercy, their knocking off themselves was no resistance of his will. This objection he answers at large,

1.By reproving the objector (Rom 9:20): Nay but, O man. This is not an objection fit to be made by the creature against his Creator, by man against God. The truth, as it is in Jesus, is that which abases man as nothing, less than nothing, and advances God as sovereign Lord of all. Observe how contemptibly he speaks of man, when he comes to argue with God his Maker: "Who art thou, thou that art so foolish, so feeble, so short-sighted, so incompetent a judge of the divine counsels? Art thou able to fathom such a depth, dispute such a case, to trace that way of God which is in the sea, his path in the great waters?" That repliest against God. It becomes us to submit to him, not to reply against him; to lie down under his hand, not to fly in his face, nor to charge him with folly. Ho antapokrinomenos - That answerest again. God is our master, and we are his servants; and it does not become servants to answer again, Tit 2:9.

2.By resolving all into the divine sovereignty. We are the thing formed, and he is the former; and it does not become us to challenge or arraign his wisdom in ordering and disposing of us into this or that shape of figure. The rude and unformed mass of matter hath no right to this or that form, but is shaped at the pleasure of him that formeth it. God's sovereignty over us is fitly illustrated by the power that the potter hath over the clay; compare Jer 18:6, where, by a like comparison, God asserts his dominion over the nation of the Jews, when he was about to magnify his justice in their destruction by Nebuchadnezzar.

(1.)He gives us the comparison, Rom 9:21. The potter, out of the same lump, may make either a fashionable vessel, and a vessel fit for creditable and honourable uses, or a contemptible vessel, and a vessel in which is no pleasure; and herein he acts arbitrarily, as he might have chosen whether he would make any vessel of it at all, or whether he would leave it in the hole of the pit, out of which it was dug.

(2.)The application of the comparison, Rom 9:22-24. Two sorts of vessels God forms out of the great lump of fallen mankind: - [1.] Vessels of wrath - vessels filled with wrath, as a vessel of wine is a vessel filled with wine; full of the fury of the Lord, Isa 51:20. In these God is willing to show his wrath, that is, his punishing justice, and his enmity to sin. This must be shown to all the world, God will make it appear that he hates sin. He will likewise make his power known, to dumaton autou. It is a power of strength and energy, an inflicting power, which works and effects the destruction of those that perish; it is a destruction that proceeds from the glory of his power, Th2 1:9. The eternal damnation of sinners will be an abundant demonstration of the power of God; for he will act in it himself immediately, his wrath preying as it were upon guilty consciences, and his arm stretched out totally to destroy their well-being, and yet at the same instant wonderfully to preserve the being of the creature. In order to this, God endured them with much long-suffering - exercised a great deal of patience towards them, let them alone to fill up the measure of sin, to grow till they were ripe for ruin, and so they became fitted for destruction, fitted by their own sin and self-hardening. The reigning corruptions and wickedness of the soul are its preparedness and disposedness for hell: a soul is hereby made combustible matter, fit for the flames of hell. When Christ said to the Jews (Mat 23:32), Fill you up then the measure of your father, that upon you may come all the righteous blood (Mat 23:35), he did, as it were, endure them with much long-suffering, that they might, by their own obstinacy and wilfulness in sin, fit themselves for destruction. [2.] Vessels of mercy - filled with mercy. The happiness bestowed upon the saved remnant is the fruit, not of their merit, but of God's mercy. The spring of all the joy and glory of heaven is that mercy of God which endures for ever. Vessels of honour must to eternity own themselves vessels of mercy. Observe, First, What he designs in them: To make known the riches of his glory, that is, of his goodness; for God's goodness is his greatest glory, especially when it is communicated with the greatest sovereignty. I beseech thee show me thy glory, says Moses, Exo 33:18. I will make all my goodness to pass before thee, says God (Exo 33:19), and that given out freely: I will be gracious to whom I will be gracious. God makes known his glory, this goodness of his, in the preservation and supply of all the creatures: the earth is full of his goodness, and the year crowned with it; but when he would demonstrate the riches of his goodness, unsearchable riches, he does it in the salvation of the saints, that will be to eternity glorious monuments of divine grace. Secondly, What he does for them he does before prepare them to glory. Sanctification is the preparation of the soul for glory, making it meet to partake of the inheritance of the saints in light. This is God's work. We can destroy ourselves fast enough, but we cannot save ourselves. Sinners fit themselves for hell, but it is God that prepares saints for heaven; and all those that God designs for heaven hereafter he prepares and fits for heaven now: he works them to the self-same thing, Co2 5:5. And would you know who these vessels of mercy are? Those whom he hath called (Rom 9:24); for whom he did predestinate those he also called with an effectual call: and these not of the Jews only, but of the Gentiles; for, the partition-wall being taken down, the world was laid in common, and not (as it had been) God's favour appropriated to the Jews, and they put a degree nearer his acceptance than the rest of the world. They now stood upon the same level with the Gentiles; and the question is not now whether of the seed of Abraham or no, that is neither here nor there, but whether or no called according to his purpose.

Copy as

Historical interpretation

Two Centuries of Reception

9 surviving comments on this verse. Each one is dated, so this reads as a timeline rather than a list.

9 quotes · AD 220–458
Ante-NicenePost-Nicene
200300400

Select a marker to jump to its quote. Markers stagger vertically where authors wrote within a few decades of each other.

In the same way the potter, too, has it in his power, by tempering the blast of his fire, to modify his clayey material into a stiffer one, and to mould one form after another more beautiful than the original substance, and now possessing both a kind and name of its own. For although the Scripture says, "Shall the clay say to the potter? " that is, Shall man contend with God? although the apostle speaks of "earthen vessels" he refers to man, who was originally clay.
Such a rebuke does not refer to one who is faithful and lives a good and righteous life and has confidence towards God.… This rebuke is not for the faithful and the saints but for the unfaithful and the ungodly.
I do not think that, if you are a faithful and discreet servant of God and want to understand and admire the wisdom of the Lord, he will say to you: “Who are you?” … If we want to know something of the secret and hidden things of God and if we are not people of lusts and contentions, then let us inquire faithfully and humbly into the judgments of God which are contained more secretly in holy Scripture. For even the Lord said: “Search the Scriptures,” knowing that these things are applicable not to those who are busy with other matters and only hear or read the Bible from time to time, but to those who with a pure and simple heart endeavor to open up the holy Scriptures by their labor and constant attention. I know well enough that I am not one of them! But anyone who is, let him seek and he will find.
AD 384AmbrosiasterPost-NiceneSourceCOMMENTARY ON PAUL’S EPISTLES
It is a great indignity and presumption for a man to answer back to God—the unjust to the just, the evil to the good, the imperfect to the perfect, the weak to the strong, the corruptible to the incorrupt, the mortal to the immortal, the servant to the Lord, the creature to the Creator!
"Nay but, O man, who art thou that repliest against God?" This he does to take down the objector's unseasonable inquisitiveness, and excessive curiosity, and to put a check upon it, and teach him to know what God is, and what man, and how incomprehensible His foreknowledge is, and how far above our reason, and how obedience to Him in all points is binding. So when he has made this preparatory step in his hearer, and has hushed and softened down his spirit, then with great felicity he introduces the answer, having made what he says easy of admittance with him.

And he does not say, it is impossible to answer questions of this kind, but that it is presumptuous to raise them. For our business is to obey what God does, not to be curious even if we do not know the reason of them. Wherefore he said, "Who art thou that repliest against God?" You see how very light he makes of him, how he bears down his swelling spirit!

"Shall the thing formed say to Him that formed it, Why hast Thou made me thus? Hath not the potter power, of the same lump to make one vessel unto honor, and another unto dishonor?" Here it is not to do away with free-will that he says this, but to show, up to what point we ought to obey God. For in respect of calling God to account, we ought to be as little disposed to it as the clay is. For we ought to abstain not from gainsaying or questioning only, but even from speaking or thinking of it at all, and to become like that lifeless matter, which followeth the potter's hands, and lets itself be drawn about anywhere he may please.

And this is the only point he applied the illustration to, not, that is, to any enunciation of the rule of life, but to the complete obedience and silence enforced upon us. And this we ought to observe in all cases, that we are not to take the illustrations quite entire, but after selecting the good of them, and that for which they were introduced, to let the rest alone. As, for instance, when he says, "He couched, he lay down as a lion;" let us take out the indomitable and fearful part, not the brutality, nor any other of the things belonging to a lion.
AD 418PelagiusPost-NiceneSourcePELAGIUS’S COMMENTARY ON ROMANS
Some people say that Paul is still speaking here in the role of those who object, because to say that nobody can oppose the will of God, who has mercy on one and who hardens another, and to add that nobody should criticize God amounts to the same thing. But others say that from here on the apostle replies that, even if there were a reason for them to make an accusation, they ought not to talk back to their Creator, for in comparison with God, we are like a piece of pottery in the hands of the potter.
AD 428Theodore of MopsuestiaPost-NiceneSourcePAULINE COMMENTARY FROM THE GREEK CHURCH
How can the thing which is made blame its Maker for the construction of its own nature? Everything must be content with its own nature, whatever that may be.
AD 430Augustine of HippoPost-NiceneSourceAUGUSTINE ON ROMANS 62
As long as you are just a creature, says Paul, like this lump of clay, and you have not been led to spiritual things, so that as a spiritual man you might judge all things and be judged by no one, it is right for you to hold back from this kind of inquiry and not to answer back to God. For everyone who wants to know God’s plan ought first to be received into his friendship, and this is only possible for spiritual people who already bear the image of the heavenly.
AD 458Theodoret of CyrusPost-NiceneSourceINTERPRETATION OF THE LETTER TO THE ROMANS
If you did not have your own independence, and if you did not choose what you do by your own free will, you would have to be quiet in the way that inanimate objects are and simply acquiesce in what is given to you. But as it is you have reason, and you can both describe and do the things which are shown to you. Instead you do not like what has happened and are trying to investigate the causes of the divine plan.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Romans 9:20 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.

Related study articles8