2 Samuel 13:38

KJV

So Absalom fled, and went to Geshur, and was there three years.

KJV (with Strong's)

So Absalom {H53} fled {H1272}, and went {H3212} to Geshur {H1650}, and was there three {H7969} years {H8141}.

Complete Jewish Bible

So Avshalom fled, went to G'shur and stayed there three years.

Berean Standard Bible

After Absalom had fled and gone to Geshur, he stayed there three years.

American Standard Version

So Absalom fled, and went to Geshur, and was there three years.

Commentary

### SUMMARY
This verse chronicles the immediate and decisive flight of Absalom to Geshur, where he remained for three years, following his calculated murder of his half-brother Amnon. This strategic retreat to his maternal grandfather's kingdom served as a temporary refuge from King David's wrath and the legal repercussions of fratricide, simultaneously setting the stage for future dramatic developments within the fractured Davidic monarchy and foreshadowing Absalom's eventual bid for power.

### CONTEXT
* **Literary Context:** This verse serves as the immediate narrative consequence of Absalom's meticulously planned act of vengeance against Amnon. The preceding chapters detail the sordid affair of [Amnon's rape of Tamar](/2_samuel/13-1-19 "2 Samuel 13:1-19 - Amnon's Violation of Tamar"), Absalom's sister, and King David's profound but ultimately passive reaction to this heinous crime. David's failure to administer justice for Tamar's violation created a deep-seated resentment in Absalom, which festered for two years. This simmering anger culminated in Absalom's orchestration of Amnon's assassination at a sheep-shearing feast, as vividly described in [2 Samuel 13:28-29](/2_samuel/13-28-29 "2 Samuel 13:28-29 - Absalom's Calculated Revenge"). Absalom's subsequent flight to Geshur is not merely an escape but a calculated move to evade immediate retribution from his father and the legal consequences of his actions, marking a significant turning point in the tragic saga of David's family.
* **Historical & Cultural Context:** Geshur was an independent Aramean kingdom situated east of the Jordan River, within the region of Bashan. Its strategic importance for Absalom stemmed directly from his lineage: his mother, Maacah, was the daughter of Talmai, the reigning king of Geshur ([2 Samuel 3:3](/2_samuel/3-3 "2 Samuel 3:3 - Absalom's Mother, Maacah")). This familial bond made Geshur an ideal and secure place of refuge, offering not just a hiding place but legitimate political asylum under the protection of his powerful maternal grandfather. In the ancient Near East, it was a common practice for individuals who had committed serious offenses or fallen out of favor with their rulers to seek sanctuary with kin, particularly those holding authority in foreign lands. Absalom's choice underscores his cunning and foresight, as he leveraged these international family ties to shield himself from David's immediate jurisdiction and potential retribution, highlighting the complex political landscape of the era.
* **Key Themes:** Absalom's flight to Geshur powerfully encapsulates several pervasive themes throughout [the book of 2 Samuel](/2_samuel/1 "2 Samuel - The Reign of King David"). Firstly, it starkly illustrates the **devastating consequences of sin and unaddressed injustice**. David's initial inaction regarding Amnon's crime created a void of justice, which Absalom filled with his own violent retribution, leading to a cascading series of tragedies. Secondly, the theme of **exile and separation** is prominent, a recurring motif in biblical narratives often associated with serious transgression or alienation from community. Absalom's three-year absence from Jerusalem underscores a period of forced removal from the royal court and the heart of Israelite society. Thirdly, this event further exposes the deep-seated **dysfunction and moral decay within David's own household**, a tragic harvest sown from David's past sins (e.g., [2 Samuel 11](/2_samuel/11 "2 Samuel 11 - David's Sin with Bathsheba")) and his subsequent failures in parental discipline and judicial administration. Finally, Absalom's calculated retreat to Geshur is a critical precursor to his future actions, subtly but significantly **foreshadowing his ambition and eventual rebellion** against King David, which would later erupt into open civil war, as detailed in [2 Samuel 15](/2_samuel/15 "2 Samuel 15 - Absalom's Rebellion").

### EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

#### Key Word Analysis
* **fled (Hebrew, _bârach'_):** This verb (בָּרַח, H1272) describes a sudden, hasty, and often fearful departure, implying a rapid escape from danger or the consequences of an action. In Absalom's context, it signifies his immediate and urgent response to the fratricide, driven by the necessity to evade King David's potential wrath or the legal repercussions of his crime. This word underscores the gravity of his act and the precariousness of his position, highlighting his calculated move to secure safety.
* **Geshur (Hebrew, _Gᵉshûwr'_):** (גְּשׁוּר, H1650) More than a mere geographical location, Geshur represents a strategically chosen sanctuary. As the kingdom of Absalom's maternal grandfather, Talmai, it offered not just a hiding place but a politically secure refuge. This choice of destination reveals Absalom's astute intelligence and foresight, as he leveraged deep familial ties and international relations to secure his immediate safety and potentially to bide his time for a future return or political maneuvering.
* **three years (Hebrew, _shâlôwsh shâneh'_):** (שָׁלֹשׁ, H7969; שָׁנֶה, H8141) The specified duration of "three years" is profoundly significant. It was a period long enough for the immediate furor and grief over Amnon's murder to subside, allowing for emotional distance and the possibility of reconciliation or political maneuvering. This period of exile was not simply passive waiting; it was a formative time during which Absalom's character could be further shaped, his resentment could fester, and his ambitions could solidify, setting the stage for his eventual return and subsequent, dramatic actions against his father, King David.

#### Verse Breakdown
* **"So Absalom fled":** This clause immediately follows the account of Amnon's murder, indicating Absalom's swift and decisive action to escape the immediate repercussions. His flight is a direct and calculated response to his violent act, demonstrating either a fear of retribution from King David or a desire to avoid the legal and social consequences of fratricide within Israelite society. It marks a clear and abrupt departure from his presence in Jerusalem and the royal court.
* **"and went to Geshur":** This specifies Absalom's chosen destination, highlighting the strategic nature of his refuge. Geshur was not a random hiding place but a secure sanctuary due to his strong familial ties with its king, Talmai, his maternal grandfather. This reveals Absalom's cunning and foresight, ensuring his safety in a foreign land where King David's immediate authority would not extend, thereby buying him time and protection.
* **"and was there three years":** This final clause provides the precise duration of Absalom's exile. The "three years" constitutes a significant period, long enough for the immediate crisis and public outcry to pass and for the political landscape to subtly shift, but not so long as to completely sever Absalom's ties with Israel. It was a time of forced separation, yet also a period during which Absalom could consolidate his thoughts, perhaps plan his return, and for David's initial anger or grief to potentially wane, paving the way for future reconciliation efforts.

#### Literary Devices
The verse employs several literary devices to convey its profound meaning and narrative impact. **Foreshadowing** is prominently featured, as Absalom's strategic flight and three-year exile are not merely an escape from immediate consequences but a crucial prelude to his eventual return and audacious rebellion against his father, King David. His calculated move to Geshur subtly hints at a deeper ambition than mere survival, suggesting a period of strategic planning. There is also a strong element of **irony** in David's initial failure to administer justice for Tamar's rape, which directly leads to Absalom's violent and self-administered justice, ultimately resulting in Absalom's own exile—a form of consequence that David himself had experienced due to his own sins. Furthermore, the specific duration of "three years" serves as a **symbolic** timeframe, often representing a period of significant transition, testing, or preparation in biblical narratives, thereby hinting at the profound changes that will occur both in Absalom's character and in the political dynamics of the kingdom during his absence.

### THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS
Absalom's flight to Geshur profoundly underscores a critical theological principle: sin, particularly unaddressed injustice, unleashes far-reaching and devastating consequences that ripple through families, communities, and even nations. King David's failure to act decisively and justly after Amnon's rape created a vacuum of righteousness, which Absalom filled with his own violent and vengeful retribution. This narrative powerfully illustrates the destructive cycle of sin, where one transgression begets another, leading to broken relationships, forced exile, and prolonged suffering. It highlights the critical importance of righteous judgment and the painful truth that even royal families are not exempt from the bitter harvest sown by their choices. The absence of justice breeds chaos, and the pursuit of personal vengeance, even when provoked, perpetuates a cycle of brokenness.

* [Galatians 6:7](/galatians/6-7 "Galatians 6:7 - The Principle of Sowing and Reaping")
* [Numbers 35:25](/numbers/35-25 "Numbers 35:25 - Cities of Refuge for Accidental Killers")
* [Genesis 4:12](/genesis/4-12 "Genesis 4:12 - Cain's Exile After Murder")

### REFLECTION AND APPLICATION
The narrative of Absalom's flight to Geshur serves as a potent and sobering reminder of the enduring and often devastating consequences of unaddressed sin, particularly within the intimate sphere of family. David's inaction, though perhaps rooted in a desire to avoid further conflict or out of a misguided sense of parental love, ultimately permitted a festering wound to become a fatal infection within his household. This story challenges us to deeply consider the ripple effect of our choices, especially when we fail to uphold justice, address wrongdoing, or confront difficult truths. It prompts us to reflect on how bitterness and a thirst for vengeance, even when seemingly justified by prior injustice, can lead to further destruction, prolonged periods of isolation, and escalating conflict. For individuals, families, and communities, this account underscores the vital necessity of swift, righteous, and compassionate justice to prevent cycles of violence and to foster genuine healing, reconciliation, and peace. It calls us to be proactive in seeking reconciliation and to trust in God's justice rather than seeking our own.

#### Questions for Reflection
* **How does King David's failure to administer justice contribute to the escalating tragedy within his family, as seen in Absalom's actions?**
* **What are the long-term consequences of unaddressed sin or unresolved conflict in our own families, churches, or communities?**
* **In what ways might the pursuit of personal vengeance, even when provoked by deep hurt, ultimately lead to greater suffering for all involved?**

### FAQ

**Why did Absalom choose Geshur specifically as his place of refuge?**

Answer: Absalom's choice of Geshur was highly strategic and deeply personal. His mother, Maacah, was the daughter of Talmai, the king of Geshur ([2 Samuel 3:3](/2_samuel/3-3 "2 Samuel 3:3 - Absalom's Mother")). This direct familial connection provided Absalom with an immediate and secure sanctuary. It was not merely a hiding place but a place of legitimate political asylum where he was under the protection of his maternal grandfather, a reigning monarch. This choice allowed him to escape the immediate wrath of King David and the legal repercussions of fratricide within Israel, while also maintaining a base from which he could potentially plan future actions without being directly subject to David's authority.

**What was the significance of Absalom's "three years" in Geshur?**

Answer: The duration of "three years" in Geshur was significant for several reasons. Firstly, it allowed a crucial cooling-off period after the shocking murder of Amnon. The immediate outrage, grief, and calls for justice would have had time to subside, creating an opportunity for David's anger to temper. Secondly, it was a period of forced exile and isolation for Absalom, during which he was removed from the royal court and the public eye in Israel. While this time could have been used for reflection and repentance, it also likely allowed his resentment and ambition to fester, as he was outside the direct influence of his father. Thirdly, this specific duration often carries symbolic weight in biblical narratives, representing a significant period of testing, preparation, or transition. In Absalom's case, these three years were a critical phase that set the stage for his eventual return to Jerusalem ([2 Samuel 14](/2_samuel/14 "2 Samuel 14 - Absalom's Return")) and his subsequent, dramatic rebellion against his father, as described in [2 Samuel 15](/2_samuel/15 "2 Samuel 15 - Absalom's Rebellion").

### CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT
The tragic narrative of Absalom's flight and exile, born from vengeance and unaddressed sin, stands in profound contrast to the ultimate refuge and perfect justice found in Jesus Christ. Absalom, a prince of Israel, fled to a foreign land for safety, driven by his own violent act and the fear of earthly retribution. Yet, in Christ, humanity finds a perfect sanctuary, not from the consequences of our own vengeance, but from the righteous judgment for our sin. While David failed to administer justice perfectly, leading to a cycle of familial brokenness, God's perfect justice and boundless mercy converge in the person of Jesus. The Lamb of God, unlike Absalom, did not flee from the consequences of sin but willingly bore them, becoming the ultimate sacrifice for humanity's rebellion against God ([John 1:29](/john/1-29 "John 1:29 - Jesus, the Lamb of God")). Where Absalom's exile was a period of festering resentment that led to further division and rebellion against his father, Christ's journey to the cross and resurrection brought profound reconciliation and peace between God and humanity ([Romans 5:8](/romans/5-8 "Romans 5:8 - God Demonstrates His Love") and [2 Corinthians 5:21](/2_corinthians/5-21 "2 Corinthians 5:21 - Christ Our Righteousness")). He is the true and living way, a refuge for all who are weary and burdened, offering not temporary political asylum but eternal rest and perfect justice, having lived a life of non-retaliation and perfect obedience, even unto death ([1 Peter 2:23](/1_peter/2-23 "1 Peter 2:23 - Christ's Example of Suffering")). In Him, the cycle of vengeance is broken, and a path to true healing and restoration is revealed.

Note: Commentary is generated by AI with a directive for Biblical fidelity. Always rely on the Holy Spirit for discernment. The Scripture text and cross-references are from verified, non-AI sources.

Cross-References

2 Samuel 14:23

So Joab arose and went to Geshur, and brought Absalom to Jerusalem.

2 Samuel 14:32

And Absalom answered Joab, Behold, I sent unto thee, saying, Come hither, that I may send thee to the king, to say, Wherefore am I come from Geshur? [it had been] good for me [to have been] there still: now therefore let me see the king's face; and if there be [any] iniquity in me, let him kill me.

2 Samuel 15:8

For thy servant vowed a vow while I abode at Geshur in Syria, saying, If the LORD shall bring me again indeed to Jerusalem, then I will serve the LORD.