Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
And these are the sons of Ehud: these are the heads of the fathers of the inhabitants of Geba, and they removed them to Manahath:
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
And these are the sons H1121 of Ehud H261: these are the heads H7218 of the fathers H1 of the inhabitants H3427 of Geba H1387, and they removed H1540 them to Manahath H4506:
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
These are the sons of Ehud, the heads of fathers' clans among the inhabitants of Geva (they were carried away captive to Manachat;
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
These were the descendants of Ehud who were the heads of the families living in Geba and were exiled to Manahath:
Ask
American Standard Version
And these are the sons of Ehud: these are the heads of fathers’ houses of the inhabitants of Geba, and they carried them captive to Manahath:
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
These are the sons of Ehud: these are the heads of fathers’ households of the inhabitants of Geba, and they carried them captive to Manahath:
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
And these are the sonnes of Ehud: these were the chiefe fathers of those that inhabited Geba: and they were caryed away captiues to Monahath,
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
And these are sons of Ehud: they are heads of fathers to the inhabitants of Geba, and they remove them unto Manahath;
Ask

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

1 Chronicles 8:6 is a precise genealogical entry detailing a specific branch of the tribe of Benjamin. It identifies "the sons of Ehud" as the leading families, or "heads of the fathers," among the inhabitants of Geba, and records their relocation to Manahath. This verse contributes to the Chronicler's comprehensive record of Israelite lineages, underscoring the importance of tribal identity, leadership, and geographical settlement patterns for the post-exilic community, affirming God's faithfulness in preserving His people.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: This verse is situated within the extensive genealogical records that open the book of 1 Chronicles (chapters 1-9), which serve as a foundational introduction to the Chronicler's historical narrative. Specifically, chapter 8 is dedicated to the tribe of Benjamin, a significant tribe due to its historical role, including providing Israel's first king, Saul, and its later loyalty to Judah during the divided monarchy. Verses 1 Chronicles 8:1-5 introduce the initial branches of Benjamin, and 1 Chronicles 8:6 then zeroes in on a particular lineage, the descendants of Ehud, before the chapter continues to list other Benjamite families and their connections to Jerusalem. The meticulous detailing of names, relationships, and geographical movements within these chapters underscores the Chronicler's overarching purpose: to establish the identity, heritage, and legitimate claims of the returning exiles to their land and covenant promises, connecting them seamlessly to their pre-exilic past.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: The book of 1 Chronicles was likely composed in the post-exilic period (late 5th or early 4th century BCE), a time when the Jewish community was re-establishing itself in Judah after the Babylonian exile. Genealogies were not merely dry lists but vital documents for ancient Israelite society. They served crucial functions: establishing tribal and family identity, validating claims to ancestral land inheritances (as seen in Numbers 26), confirming eligibility for priestly or Levitical service, and maintaining social order. Geba was a prominent city in the territory of Benjamin, frequently mentioned in biblical narratives as a strategic location (e.g., 1 Samuel 13:3). The mention of "Manahath," though its exact location is less certain, signifies a real geographical relocation. The phrase "they removed them" implies a deliberate, possibly enforced, transfer of population, reflecting the dynamic and often turbulent socio-political landscape of the ancient Near East, where populations were frequently resettled by conquering powers or administrative decrees, a common practice of empires like Assyria and Babylon.
  • Key Themes: The verse, though brief, contributes to several key themes prevalent throughout the Chronicler's work. Firstly, it highlights the Preservation of Lineage and Identity, emphasizing the meticulous attention given to family lines. For the post-exilic community, these records were crucial for re-establishing their place within God's covenant people and their claim to the land, demonstrating God's faithfulness in preserving a remnant, a theme echoed in Ezra 2 and Nehemiah 7. Secondly, the mention of "heads of the fathers" underscores the importance of Leadership and Social Structure in ancient Israel. These patriarchal figures were vital for maintaining tribal cohesion, order, and continuity, reflecting a divinely ordained system of governance. Lastly, the detail of relocation to Manahath points to Divine Sovereignty in Human Movements. Even in seemingly mundane or forced geographical shifts, the Chronicler implicitly affirms God's overarching hand in directing the destiny of His people, a theme seen throughout Israel's history, from Abraham's migration to the Babylonian exile itself, where God used foreign powers to accomplish His purposes (e.g., Isaiah 10:5-7).

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • Sons (Hebrew, bên', H1121): This word signifies a male offspring, but in a broader sense, it encompasses descendants, members of a family, or even a particular class or group. In 1 Chronicles 8:6, "sons of Ehud" refers not just to his immediate children but to the entire lineage or clan that descended from him, indicating a foundational ancestral figure for this branch of the Benjamite tribe. The term emphasizes the generational continuity and the establishment of a distinct family unit.
  • Heads of the fathers (Hebrew, rôʼš ʼâbôṯ', H7218): This phrase combines H7218 ("head," signifying chief or principal) and H1 ("father," referring to an ancestor or patriarchal figure). Together, it denotes the leading men, chieftains, or patriarchal heads of the ancestral houses or clans. These individuals were authoritative figures responsible for their extended families, representing them in tribal assemblies, overseeing land distribution, and maintaining social order. Their designation as "heads" indicates their significant status and influence within the community of Geba, highlighting the patriarchal structure of Israelite society and the importance of ancestral leadership.
  • Removed (Hebrew, gâlâh', H1540): This primitive root means "to denude," "to exile," or "to reveal." In its Hiphil (causative) form, as used here, it means "to cause to go into exile," "to deport," or "to remove." The Hiphil conjugation indicates that the action was performed by an external agent or authority, implying a deliberate, likely enforced, relocation rather than a voluntary migration. This suggests a significant historical event that altered the settlement patterns of these Benjamite families, possibly due to military conquest, administrative decree, or inter-tribal dynamics, highlighting the vulnerability of populations to external forces in the ancient Near East.

Verse Breakdown

  • "And these [are] the sons of Ehud:" This opening clause introduces the specific lineage that is the focus of the verse, identifying them as the descendants of a man named Ehud. It establishes the patriarchal head of this particular branch of the tribe of Benjamin, setting the stage for detailing their status and movements within the broader tribal genealogy.
  • "these are the heads of the fathers of the inhabitants of Geba," This part clarifies the significant role and status of Ehud's descendants. They were not merely residents but the leading families, the patriarchal chieftains, who held authority and represented the community of Geba. Geba, a key city within Benjamin's territory, thus had its leadership rooted in this specific, prominent clan, underscoring their social and political importance.
  • "and they removed them to Manahath:" This final clause describes a significant geographical shift for these families. It indicates that the "sons of Ehud," who were the leading families in Geba, were subsequently relocated to Manahath. The impersonal or passive nature of "they removed them" suggests an external force or authority initiated this relocation, marking a notable event in the history of this Benjamite clan that impacted their settlement and perhaps their social standing.

Literary Devices

The primary literary device at play in 1 Chronicles 8:6, and indeed throughout the initial chapters of the book, is Genealogy. This is not merely a dry list of names but a structured record designed to establish identity, legitimacy, and continuity for the post-exilic community. The Chronicler uses genealogy to affirm the covenant faithfulness of God in preserving a remnant and to underscore the historical roots and rightful claims of the returning exiles. The verse also employs Toponymy, the use of specific place names (Geba, Manahath), which grounds the abstract lineage in concrete geographical reality, making the history tangible and verifiable for the original audience. This grounds the narrative in a real historical and geographical context. Furthermore, the Conciseness of the genealogical record, typical of this genre, allows for the efficient transmission of vital information about lineage, leadership, and movement within a compact format, highlighting the essential facts without extraneous detail.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

Although seemingly a dry list of names and places, 1 Chronicles 8:6 profoundly illustrates God's meticulous attention to the details of human history and the lives of His covenant people. It underscores the divine faithfulness in preserving the tribal identities and structures of Israel, even through periods of upheaval and relocation. For the Chronicler's original audience, these records were a powerful affirmation of their place within God's ongoing redemptive plan and their rightful claim to their ancestral lands. The very existence of such precise records testifies to a God who is intimately involved in the unfolding story of His people, ensuring the continuity necessary for His ultimate purposes, including the preservation of the lineage through which the Messiah would come.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

1 Chronicles 8:6, like all Scripture, is purposeful. It reminds us that God is a God of order and detail, deeply invested in the lives and histories of His people. Even the seemingly mundane records of lineage and geographical shifts reveal a divine hand at work, overseeing the preservation of His covenant community. For us today, this verse can serve as a powerful reminder that our own lives, with their unique family histories, geographical moves, and personal transitions, are not random but are interwoven into God's larger tapestry of redemptive history. It encourages us to embrace our spiritual heritage as children of God, recognizing that our identity is not merely defined by our earthly lineage or location, but by our belonging to Christ and His eternal family. Furthermore, it prompts us to consider how God orchestrates events, even "removals" or changes that seem disruptive, in our lives for His sovereign purposes, calling us to trust His guidance through every transition and to find our ultimate security not in earthly stability but in His unchanging character and promises.

Questions for Reflection

  • How does the meticulous detail of biblical genealogies, like 1 Chronicles 8:6, deepen your understanding of God's sovereignty and faithfulness in history?
  • In what ways does understanding your spiritual heritage in Christ inform your identity and purpose today, transcending earthly family lines or geographical locations?
  • How can we discern God's hand in the "removals" or transitions in our own lives, whether geographical, relational, or circumstantial, and trust His ultimate plan?

FAQ

Why are these genealogies so extensive and detailed in 1 Chronicles?

Answer: The extensive and detailed genealogies in 1 Chronicles, including 1 Chronicles 8:6, served several crucial purposes for the post-exilic community in Judah. Firstly, they helped to re-establish the identity and continuity of the nation after the return from Babylonian exile, connecting the present community to their historical roots and the covenant promises made to their ancestors. This was vital for a people seeking to rebuild their national and spiritual identity. Secondly, these records were essential for proving legitimate claims to ancestral land inheritances, as land ownership and tribal affiliation were inextricably linked in Israelite society, as outlined in Numbers 36. Thirdly, they were vital for validating eligibility for specific roles, particularly for priestly and Levitical service in the rebuilt Temple, ensuring that only those of the correct lineage served, as highlighted in Ezra 2:61-63. Finally, the genealogies, especially the Davidic line, underscored the hope for the restoration of the monarchy and the coming Messiah, demonstrating God's faithfulness in preserving the royal line despite the exile.

What is the significance of "heads of the fathers"?

Answer: The term "heads of the fathers" (Hebrew, rôʼš ʼâbôṯ) refers to the leading men, chieftains, or patriarchal heads of the ancestral houses or clans within Israelite society. These individuals held significant authority and responsibility within their extended families and tribes. They were responsible for maintaining order, administering justice, representing their families in broader tribal or national assemblies, and ensuring the proper inheritance and management of family lands. Their position was foundational to the social and administrative structure of ancient Israel, reflecting a patriarchal system where lineage and family leadership were paramount. These "heads" were crucial for the continuity and cohesion of the tribal structure, particularly important for the post-exilic community seeking to re-establish its societal framework.

What does "they removed them to Manahath" imply about the history of these families?

Answer: The phrase "they removed them to Manahath" (Hebrew, heḡlām) implies a deliberate and likely enforced relocation of the families of Ehud from Geba to Manahath. The Hebrew verb used (from gâlâh) suggests a "deportation" or "causing to go into exile," rather than a voluntary migration. This indicates that the settlement patterns of Israelite families were not always static and could be subject to significant shifts due to external pressures. Such removals could have been initiated by conquering powers (like the Assyrians or Babylonians, who famously deported populations, as seen in 2 Kings 17:6), administrative decrees by a ruling authority, or perhaps even internal tribal reorganizations. It highlights the dynamic and often turbulent historical context in which these families lived, where their geographical presence could be altered by forces beyond their immediate control, yet still within God's overarching providence.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

While 1 Chronicles 8:6 is a specific genealogical detail, its ultimate significance, like all Scripture, points to Christ. The meticulous preservation of lineages, the identification of "heads of the fathers," and the tracing of tribal movements all serve the grand narrative of God's redemptive plan, culminating in the advent of His Son. The careful record-keeping ensures the legitimacy of the Messiah's earthly lineage, fulfilling the promises made to Abraham that through his seed all nations would be blessed (Genesis 22:18) and to David that his throne would be established forever (2 Samuel 7:16). Jesus Christ is the ultimate "Head of the fathers," the true and eternal head of a new spiritual family, the church, where believers from every tribe and nation are adopted as sons and daughters through faith in Him (Galatians 3:26-29). The "removal" of these Benjamite families to Manahath, a seemingly small detail, foreshadows the broader divine sovereignty over all human movements and history, ultimately guiding all things toward the establishment of Christ's eternal kingdom, where He gathers His people from every corner of the earth (Matthew 24:31). Just as God preserved a physical lineage, He now gathers a spiritual one, drawing people into His presence, fulfilling the promise that in Christ, all the families of the earth would be blessed (Acts 3:25). The entire trajectory of Israel's history, meticulously recorded in passages like this, is designed to prepare the way for the one who would perfectly embody Israel's identity and fulfill its mission: Jesus Christ, the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world (John 1:29).

Copy as

Commentary on 1 Chronicles 8 verses 1–32

There is little or nothing of history in all these verses; we have not therefore much to observe. 1. As to the difficulties that occur in this and the foregoing genealogies we need not perplex ourselves. I presume Ezra took them as he found them in the books of the kings of Israel and Judah (Ezr 9:1), according as they were given in by the several tribes, each observing what method they thought fit. Hence some ascend, others desecnd; some have numbers affixed, others places; some have historical remarks intermixed, others have not; some are shorter, others longer; some agree with other records, others differ; some, it is likely, were torn, erased, and blotted, others more legible. Those of Dan and Reuben were entirely lost. This holy man wrote as he was moved by the Holy Ghost; but there was no necessity for the making up of the defects, no, nor for the rectifying of the mistakes, of these genealogies by inspiration. It was sufficient that he copied them out as they came into his hand, or so much of them as was requisite to the present purpose, which was the directing of the returned captives to settle as nearly as they could with those of their own family, and in the places of their former residence. We may suppose that many things in these genealogies which to us seem intricate, abrupt, and perplexed, were plain and easy to them then (who knew how to fill up the deficiencies) and abundantly answered the intention of the publishing of them. 2. Many great and mighty nations there were now in being upon earth, and many illustrious men in them, whose names are buried in perpetual oblivion, while the names of multitudes of the Israel of God are here carefully preserved in everlasting remembrance. They are Jasher, Jeshurun - just ones, and the memory of the just is blessed. Many of these we have reason to fear, came short of everlasting honour (for even the wicked kings of Judah come into the genealogy), yet the perpetuating of their names here was a figure of the writing of the names of all God's spiritual Israel in the Lamb's book of life. 3. This tribe of Benjamin was once brought to a very low ebb, in the time of the judges, upon the occasion of the iniquity of Gibeah, when only 600 men escaped the sword of justice; and yet, in these genealogies, it makes as good a figure as almost any of the tribes: for it is the honour of God to help the weakest and raise up those that are most diminished and abased. 4. Here is mention of one Ehud (Ch1 8:6), in the preceding verse of one Gera (Ch1 8:5) and (Ch1 8:8) of one that descended from him, that begat children in the country of Moab, which inclines me to think it was that Ehud who was the second of the judges of Israel; for he is said to be the son of Gera and a Benjamite (Jdg 3:15), and he delivered Israel from the oppression of the Moabites by killing the king of Moab, which might give him a greater sway in the country of Moab than we find evidence of in his history and might occasion some of his posterity to settle there. 5. Here is mention of some of the Benjamites that drove away the inhabitants of Gath (Ch1 8:13), perhaps those that had slain the Ephraimites (Ch1 7:21) or their posterity, by way of reprisal: and one of those that did this piece of justice was named Beriah too, that name in which the memorial of that injury was preserved. 6. Particular notice is taken of those that dwelt in Jerusalem (Ch1 8:28 and again Ch1 8:32), that those whose ancestors had had their residence there might thereby be induced, at their return from captivity, to settle there too, which, for aught that appears, few were willing to do, because it was the post of danger: and therefore we find (Neh 11:2) the people blessed those that willingly offered themselves to dwell at Jerusalem, the greater part being inclined to prefer the cities of Judah. Those whose godly parents had their conversation in the new Jerusalem should thereby be engaged to set their faces thitherward and pursue the way thither, whatever it cost them.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 1–32. Public domain.
Copy as
Theodoret of CyrusAD 458
QUESTIONS ON FIRST CHRONICLES, PROLOGUE
The Chronicles also speak about the tabernacle because a temple of the Lord had not yet been built by either Samuel or David. The text also adds that that the holy services were held in the tabernacle. Worship was observed at that time according to the number of the days of the week. For it also says, “and their kindred who were in their villages were obliged to come in every seven days, in turn, to be with them.” With regard to the holy utensils it says, “Some of them had charge of the utensils of service, for they were required to count them when they were brought in and taken out. Others of them were appointed over the furniture, and over all the holy utensils, also over the choice flour, the wine, the oil, the incense and the spices.” And about the priests it says, “Others, of the sons of the priests, prepared the mixing of the spices.” With regard to the tomb of Saul the Chronicles gives us much information, and in the Book of Kings itself we read that his bones were gathered and buried in the land of Jabesh.
Theodoret of CyrusAD 458
QUESTIONS ON 1 CHRONICLES, PROLOGUE
There is abundant information in the books of Chronicles which were written to continue the books of the Kings and to preserve the memory of such important events. The first book begins with a genealogy that sets out to demonstrate how the human race came from a single man. Since it focuses only on the single kingdom of Judah, it can tell us about its cities and the villages, and from where they took their names. Here we come to know Nathan, from whom the blessed Luke constructed the beginning of his genealogy of our Lord and Savior, Son of David and Solomon’s brother4 on his mother’s side: “The following children were born to him in Jerusalem: Shimeah, Shobab, Nathan and Solomon, that is, the four children he fathered with Bersabea, daughter of Ammiel.” And Rechab6 herself, who is mentioned in many books of Scripture, is said to have come from the tribe of Judah.It also clearly explains why Reuben lost his birthright and Joseph gained it and also, finally, the reason why the tribe of Judah obtained the highest honor: “The sons of Reuben the firstborn of Israel. He was the firstborn, but because he defiled his father’s bed his birthright was given to the sons of Joseph son of Israel, so that he is not enrolled in the genealogy according to the birthright; though Judah became prominent among his brothers and a ruler came from him, yet the birthright belonged to Joseph.” It also explains the reason why such a great honor was conceded to Joseph. By the will of God Judah had the dignity of receiving the Lord who was born from him according to the flesh. This is the sense tacitly expressed with the words “a leader from him.” Indeed the passage seems to assert that not only the kings of the earth derived from Judah, but also the eternal king himself who had no beginning and will never end.
It also describes the situation of the tribes beyond the Jordan, those of Reuben and Gad, and even the tribes of Manasseh which later were received into those of the Hagarites and the Itureans, and talks about the tribes of the Naphiseans, and all those peoples who entered into conflict with them. In addition the text relates how they fought and won, and made the Hagarites flee. And it also reports the reason for the victory: “When they received help against them, the Hagarites and all who were with them were given into their hands, for they cried to God in the battle, and he granted their entreaty because they trusted in him.” It also describes the amount of the spoils of war: “They captured their livestock: 50, of their camels, 250, sheep, 2, donkeys and 100, captives. Many were slain because the war was from God. And they lived in their territory until the exile.”
Theodoret of CyrusAD 458
QUESTIONS ON 1 CHRONICLES, PROLOGUE
The genealogy of the priests and the Levites comes after this. It relates that Zadok, who was high priest at the time of David, had been the eleventh from Aaron; that Azariah, nephew of Zadok, had been the first to receive the priestly anointing in the temple built by Solomon. Among them there was also Jehozadak, who was brought to Babylon as a war prisoner. Jesus9 was his son, a high priest as well, who delivered the people from bondage together with Zerubbabel, and built a temple for the Lord. Here we also learn that Korah, who revolted against the great Moses, was a nephew of Isaar, son of Caath and brother of Amram, Aaron’s and Moses’ father. According to this lineage he was related to the first legislator. But he himself paid in the desert for his errors, although his children did not share the punishment of their father. From here Samuel13 came and then Aeman, who intoned Psalms and was a nephew of the prophet Samuel. In fact he was the son of Joel, son of Samuel. On the other hand, Asaph, one of the singers, came from the lineage of Gerson, son of Levi and brother of Caath. Aetham, who also belonged to the group of the singers, had Merari, the third son of Levi, as great-grandfather.The text also explains the difference between the priests and the Levites. It relates that the Levites were initiated into all the ministries of the holy altar of God: “But Aaron and his sons made offerings on the altar of burnt offering and on the altar of incense, doing all the work of the most holy place, to make atonement for Israel, according to all that Moses the servant of God had commanded.” It seems to me, in fact, that this book was written after the return from Babylon. For this reason it also talks about the bondage and explains its cause: “So all Israel was enrolled by genealogies; and these are written in the book of the Kings of Israel. And Judah was taken into exile in Babylon because of their unfaithfulness. Now the first to live again in their possessions in their towns were Israelites, priests, Levites, and temple servants.” These accounts show that the book was begun after the captivity. Indeed no historian ever relates facts that happened afterwards, but what happened before or during his times. And actually only the prophets have the power to foretell the future. In addition it says that also those who had inhabited that land before them had been enslaved. And actually many of them still live with them: the Canaanites, Chettites, Jebusites, who had been their companions in such a misfortune. Also the priests and the Levites were brought into captivity with the Israelites. I believe that those who were called “the saints’ servants” were then called Nathinim. Many of them, in fact, consecrated themselves to the ministries of the priests and the Levites. There were among them also those who were entrusted with the carrying of the water, the gathering of wood and other necessary duties. Indeed, if it was imposed to the Gabaonites, who were foreigners, to follow Joshua in the praises and to perform some works as porters or carpenters, this task was even more the duty of the Israelites. As a proof of this I have found in the interpretation of Hebrew names that this name means “house of Iaō,” that is, “of the God who is.” The text, in fact, mentions the children of Israel and among them Judah and Benjamin, and Ephraim18 and Manasseh. It also mentions the priests and the Levites, who inhabited those cities. About the Korēnites it says that they derived from Korah. It also says that among them there had been the guardians of the temple of God as well, and it seems that this custom had been introduced by Samuel and David. “All these, who were chosen as gatekeepers at the thresholds, were two hundred twelve. They were enrolled by genealogies in their villages. David and the prophet Samuel established them in their office of trust. So they and their descendants were in charge of the gates of the house of the Lord, that is, the house of the tent, as guards. The gatekeepers were on the four sides, east, west, north, and south.”
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying 1 Chronicles 8:6 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.