Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
In the ninth year of Hoshea the king of Assyria took Samaria, and carried Israel away into Assyria, and placed them in Halah and in Habor by the river of Gozan, and in the cities of the Medes.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
In the ninth H8671 year H8141 of Hoshea H1954 the king H4428 of Assyria H804 took H3920 Samaria H8111, and carried H1540 Israel H3478 away H1540 into Assyria H804, and placed H3427 them in Halah H2477 and in Habor H2249 by the river H5104 of Gozan H1470, and in the cities H5892 of the Medes H4074.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
In the ninth year of Hoshea, the king of Ashur captured Shomron. He carried Isra'el away captive to Ashur, resettling them in Halach, in Havor on the Gozan River and in the cities of the Medes.
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
In the ninth year of Hoshea, the king of Assyria captured Samaria and carried away the Israelites to Assyria, where he settled them in Halah, in Gozan by the Habor River, and in the cities of the Medes.
Ask
American Standard Version
In the ninth year of Hoshea the king of Assyria took Samaria, and carried Israel away unto Assyria, and placed them in Halah, and on the Habor, the river of Gozan, and in the cities of the Medes.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
In the ninth year of Hoshea the king of Assyria took Samaria, and carried Israel away to Assyria, and placed them in Halah, and on the Habor, the river of Gozan, and in the cities of the Medes.
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
In the ninth yeere of Hoshea, the King of Asshur tooke Samaria, and caryed Israel away vnto Asshur, and put them in Halah, and in Habor by the riuer of Gozan, and in the cities of the Medes.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
in the ninth year of Hoshea hath the king of Asshur captured Samaria, and removeth Israel to Asshur, and causeth them to dwell in Halah, and in Habor, by the river Gozan, and in the cities of the Medes.
Ask

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

The pivotal verse of 2 Kings 17:6 records the tragic culmination of centuries of Israel's rebellion against God: the fall of Samaria, the capital of the Northern Kingdom, to the Assyrian Empire. In the ninth year of King Hoshea's reign, the Assyrians, under Shalmaneser V and later Sargon II, conquered Samaria and implemented their brutal policy of mass deportation, scattering the Israelite population into various regions of Mesopotamia and Media. This event marked the definitive end of the Northern Kingdom as a distinct political and national entity, serving as a stark fulfillment of divine judgment for persistent idolatry and covenant unfaithfulness.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: This verse serves as the climactic point of the narrative detailing the decline and fall of the Northern Kingdom of Israel. It immediately follows the account of Hoshea's rebellion against Assyria, his imprisonment, and the three-year siege of Samaria by Shalmaneser V (2 Kings 17:3-5). The verses that follow 2 Kings 17:6 (specifically 2 Kings 17:7-23) provide an extensive theological commentary on why this catastrophe occurred, attributing it directly to Israel's persistent sin, idolatry, and rejection of God's covenant and prophetic warnings. Thus, 2 Kings 17:6 is not merely a historical report but the central event around which the subsequent theological explanation revolves, highlighting God's justice and faithfulness to His covenant curses.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: The late 8th century BCE was dominated by the rising power of the Neo-Assyrian Empire, which employed ruthless military tactics and a systematic policy of mass deportation to control conquered territories and prevent future rebellions. This policy involved uprooting entire populations from their homelands and resettling them in distant parts of the empire, thereby dissolving national identity and cohesion. Israel, caught between Assyria and Egypt, attempted to play these superpowers against each other, leading to Hoshea's fatal decision to withhold tribute from Assyria and seek an alliance with Egypt. Culturally, the Northern Kingdom had, since its inception, been plagued by syncretism and idolatry, establishing golden calves at Bethel and Dan and adopting Canaanite Baal worship, practices explicitly forbidden by the Mosaic Law (e.g., Deuteronomy 12:29-31). This deep-seated spiritual apostasy, despite repeated warnings from prophets like Elijah, Elisha, Amos, and Hosea, set the stage for divine judgment executed through the Assyrian Empire.
  • Key Themes: The fall of Samaria and the exile of Israel in 2 Kings 17:6 underscore several profound themes. Foremost is the theme of Divine Judgment, demonstrating God's unwavering justice against persistent sin and covenant unfaithfulness, as prophesied in the Law (e.g., Deuteronomy 28:64). This event also highlights the Sovereignty of God over all nations, even using pagan empires like Assyria as instruments of His righteous purposes (Isaiah 10:5-6). Furthermore, it marks the End of the Northern Kingdom, signifying the definitive dissolution of the ten northern tribes as a distinct political entity and the beginning of their dispersion, leading to the concept of the "lost tribes of Israel." Finally, the narrative implicitly emphasizes the Consequences of Idolatry and Disobedience, serving as a stark warning against spiritual apostasy and the abandonment of God's covenant commands, a theme consistently present throughout the book of 2 Kings.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • Assyria (Hebrew, ʼAshshûwr', H804): This refers to the Neo-Assyrian Empire, the dominant geopolitical power in the ancient Near East during the 8th century BCE. Far from being a random historical actor, Assyria is consistently portrayed in biblical prophecy and narrative as an instrument of divine judgment, a "rod" in God's hand to punish rebellious nations, including Israel. Their brutal efficiency in warfare and systematic deportation policies made them a fearsome and effective tool for fulfilling God's covenant curses.
  • took (Hebrew, lâkad', H3920): This primitive root means "to catch (in a net, trap or pit); generally, to capture or occupy." In the context of 2 Kings 17:6, it signifies the decisive military conquest of Samaria by the Assyrian king. This was not merely a siege but a complete seizure, marking the end of the city's, and thus the kingdom's, independence.
  • carried away (Hebrew, gâlâh', H1540): This primitive root means "to denude (especially in a disgraceful sense); by implication, to exile (captives being usually stripped); figuratively, to reveal." The use of this word emphasizes the forced removal and humiliation of the Israelite population, a direct fulfillment of the covenant curses that warned of scattering and loss of land due to unfaithfulness.
  • placed (Hebrew, yâshab', H3427): This primitive root means "to sit down... by implication, to dwell, to remain; causatively, to settle." In this context, it describes the Assyrian policy of forcibly resettling the exiled Israelites in new, distant locations within their empire. This act was designed to break their national identity and prevent future rebellions by integrating them into the broader Assyrian populace.

Verse Breakdown

  • "In the ninth year of Hoshea": This specifies the precise historical timing of Samaria's fall, placing it within the reign of Hoshea, the last king of the Northern Kingdom of Israel. This detail anchors the event firmly in the historical chronology of the ancient Near East, highlighting the finality of Israel's decline under its last monarch.
  • "the king of Assyria took Samaria": This declares the conquest of the capital city, Samaria, by the Assyrian monarch. While Shalmaneser V initiated the siege, it was likely completed by his successor, Sargon II, who claimed the capture of Samaria in his own inscriptions. "Took" signifies a decisive military victory, ending the three-year siege mentioned in the preceding verses and dismantling the political heart of the Northern Kingdom.
  • "and carried Israel away into Assyria": This describes the subsequent act of deportation, a hallmark of Assyrian imperial policy. "Israel" here refers to the inhabitants of the Northern Kingdom, who were forcibly removed from their homeland and transported to various parts of the vast Assyrian Empire. This act effectively dismantled the nation of Israel, dissolving its national and tribal cohesion.
  • "and placed them in Halah and in Habor [by] the river of Gozan, and in the cities of the Medes": These are specific geographical locations within the Assyrian sphere of influence, detailing the destinations of the exiled Israelites. Halah and Habor (likely the Khabur River, a tributary of the Euphrates) are in northern Mesopotamia, while "the cities of the Medes" refers to regions east of Assyria, in what is now northwestern Iran. This precise geographical detail underscores the historical veracity of the biblical account and the vast reach of the Assyrian deportation policy, ensuring the thorough scattering of the Israelite population.

Literary Devices

The primary literary device at play in 2 Kings 17:6 is Historical Narrative, presenting a concise, factual account of a pivotal geopolitical event. The verse functions as a climactic summary of the preceding narrative of Hoshea's reign and Assyrian aggression, marking the definitive end of the Northern Kingdom. It also employs Foreshadowing, as the total destruction and scattering of the Northern Kingdom implicitly warns the Southern Kingdom of Judah about the consequences of their own potential unfaithfulness, setting a precedent for future exiles. Furthermore, there is an element of Divine Irony in God using a pagan, ruthless empire like Assyria as the instrument of His righteous judgment against His own covenant people, demonstrating His absolute sovereignty over all nations and their rulers, even those who do not acknowledge Him.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

The fall of Samaria and the exile of Israel represent a profound theological statement about God's justice, holiness, and covenant faithfulness. This was not a random historical misfortune but a direct consequence of Israel's persistent idolatry, social injustice, and rejection of the Mosaic covenant, despite repeated warnings from prophets. God, who had brought Israel out of Egypt and established them in the land, was also faithful to His covenant curses, demonstrating that He holds His people accountable for their actions. This event serves as a powerful reminder that God's patience has limits and that persistent rebellion against His revealed will inevitably leads to severe consequences. It underscores the truth that true security and blessing lie only in faithful obedience to the Lord.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

The tragic account of Israel's exile in 2 Kings 17:6 serves as a powerful and sobering lesson for believers today. It underscores the gravity of sin and the inevitable consequences of persistent disobedience to God's commands. Just as ancient Israel faced judgment for abandoning the Lord and pursuing idolatry, we too are called to examine our hearts for any "idols" that compete for God's rightful place in our lives—whether they be wealth, power, comfort, or self-reliance. This narrative reminds us that God is sovereign, just, and holy, and while He is merciful and patient, He also holds His people accountable. It challenges us to cultivate a deep and unwavering faithfulness, recognizing that true flourishing comes only through wholehearted devotion to Him. The history of Israel's fall is a perpetual call to vigilance against spiritual complacency and a renewed commitment to living in humble obedience to God's Word.

Questions for Reflection

  • What "idols" or competing loyalties in my own life might be subtly drawing my heart away from complete devotion to God?
  • How does understanding God's justice in Israel's exile deepen my appreciation for His grace and patience in my own life?
  • In what ways can I actively cultivate a greater sense of faithfulness and obedience to God's Word in my daily walk?

FAQ

What was the primary reason for the Northern Kingdom's fall and exile?

Answer: The primary reason for the Northern Kingdom's fall and exile was their persistent and systemic idolatry and unfaithfulness to the covenant with Yahweh. From the very beginning of the divided monarchy, King Jeroboam I established golden calves at Bethel and Dan, leading the people into a pattern of false worship (1 Kings 12:28-30). This was compounded by the adoption of Baal worship under kings like Ahab and Jezebel, and a general disregard for God's laws and prophetic warnings. The subsequent verses in 2 Kings 17:7-23 explicitly detail these sins, including worshipping other gods, building high places, practicing divination, and rejecting God's statutes. The Assyrian conquest was, therefore, not merely a political defeat but a divinely ordained judgment for their spiritual apostasy.

What happened to the "lost tribes of Israel" after the Assyrian deportation?

Answer: The "lost tribes of Israel" refer to the ten northern tribes deported by the Assyrians. While the term "lost" implies their complete disappearance, it's more accurate to say they lost their distinct tribal and national identity. The Assyrian policy was designed to integrate conquered peoples into the empire, breaking their cohesion. Some Israelites likely assimilated into the surrounding cultures, intermarrying and adopting local customs and religions. However, some remnants of these tribes undoubtedly remained in the land or eventually migrated south to Judah, contributing to the population there. Furthermore, the New Testament indicates that the twelve tribes, though scattered, were still recognized as a people (e.g., James 1:1, Acts 26:7). Ultimately, in God's redemptive plan, all of scattered Israel will be gathered and restored through Christ.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

The tragic exile of Israel in 2 Kings 17:6, a consequence of their covenant unfaithfulness, powerfully foreshadows the ultimate scattering of humanity due to sin and points directly to the necessity of Christ. Just as Israel was exiled from the promised land, humanity was exiled from God's presence in Eden due to disobedience (Genesis 3:23-24). The failure of the Northern Kingdom, and indeed all of Israel, to perfectly uphold the Law demonstrated humanity's inability to achieve righteousness on its own. Jesus Christ, the true Israel, perfectly fulfilled the Law and bore the ultimate judgment for sin, becoming the Lamb of God, who takes away the sin of the world!. Through His death and resurrection, He inaugurated a New Covenant, not written on tablets of stone but on human hearts (Jeremiah 31:31-34), gathering a new people—Jew and Gentile—from every nation, tribe, and tongue into His spiritual kingdom (Revelation 7:9). He is the true Shepherd who gathers the scattered sheep (John 10:16), offering not exile but eternal life and restoration in His presence. The judgment against Israel highlights the depths of human sin, making the grace and redemptive work of Christ all the more glorious as the means by which God's people are truly brought home.

Copy as

Commentary on 2 Kings 17 verses 1–6

We have here the reign and ruin of Hoshea, the last of the kings of Israel, concerning whom observe,

I. That, though he forced his way to the crown by treason and murder (as we read Kg2 15:30), yet he gained not the possession of it till seven or eight years after; for it was in the fourth year of Ahaz that he slew Pekah, but did not himself begin to reign till the twelfth year of Ahaz, Kg2 17:1. Whether by the king of Assyria, or by the king of Judah, or by some of his own people, does not appear, but it seems so long he was kept out of the throne he aimed at. Justly were his bad practices thus chastised, and the word of the prophet was thus fulfilled (Hos 10:3), Now they shall say We have no king, because we feared not the Lord.

II. That, though he was bad, yet not so bad as the kings of Israel had been before him (Kg2 17:2), not so devoted to the calves as they had been. One of them (that at Dan), the Jews say, had been, before this, carried away by the king of Assyria in the expedition recorded Kg2 15:29, (to which perhaps the prophet refers, Hos 8:5, Thy calf, O Samaria! has cast thee off), which made him put the less confidence in the other. And some say that this Hoshea took off the embargo which the former kings had put their subjects under, forbidding them to go up to Jerusalem to worship, which he permitted those to do that had a mind to it. But what shall we think of this dispensation of providence, that the destruction of the kingdom of Israel should come in the reign of one of the best of its kings? Thy judgments, O God! are a great deep. God would hereby show that in bringing this ruin upon them he designed to punish, 1. Not only the sins of that generation, but of the foregoing ages, and to reckon for the iniquities of their fathers, who had been long in filing the measure and treasuring up wrath against this day of wrath. 2. Not only the sins of their kings, but the sins of the people. If Hoshea was not so bad as the former kings, yet the people were as bad as those that went before them, and it was an aggravation of their badness, and brought ruin the sooner, that their king did not set them so bad an example as the former kings had done, nor hinder them from reforming; he gave them leave to do better, but they did as bad as ever, which laid the blame of their sin and ruin wholly upon themselves.

III. That the destruction came gradually. They were for some time made tributaries before they were made captives to the king of Assyria (Kg2 17:3), and, if that less judgment had prevailed to humble and reform them, the greater would have been prevented.

IV. That they brought it upon themselves by the indirect course they took to shake off the yoke of the king of Assyria, Kg2 17:4. Had the king and people of Israel applied to God, made their peace with him and their prayers to him, they might have recovered their liberty, ease, and honour; but they withheld their tribute, and trusted to the king of Egypt to assist them in their revolt, which, if it had taken effect, would have been but to change their oppressors. But Egypt became to them the staff of a broken reed. This provoked the king of Assyria to proceed against them with the more severity. Men get nothing by struggling with the net, but entangle themselves the more.

V. That it was an utter destruction that came upon them. 1. The king of Israel was made a prisoner; he was shut up and bound, being, it is probable, taken by surprise, before Samaria was besieged. 2. The land of Israel was made a prey. The army of the king of Assyria came up throughout all the land, made themselves master of it (Kg2 17:5), and treated the people as traitors to be punished with the sword of justice rather than as fair enemies. 3. The royal city of Israel was besieged, and at length taken. Three years it held out after the country was conquered, and no doubt a great deal of misery was endured at that time which is not particularly recorded; but the brevity of the story, and the passing of this matter over lightly, methinks, intimate that they were abandoned of God and he did not now regard the affliction of Israel, as sometimes as he had done. 4. The people of Israel were carried captives into Assyria, Kg2 17:6. The generality of the people, those that were of any note, were forced away into the conqueror's country, to be slaves and beggars there. (1.) Thus he was pleased to exercise a dominion over them, and to show that they were entirely at his disposal. (2.) By depriving them of their possessions and estates, real and personal, and exposing them to all the hardships and reproaches of a removal to a strange country, under the power of an imperious army, he chastised them for their rebellion and their endeavour to shake off his yoke. (3.) Thus he effectually prevented all such attempts for the future and secured their country to himself. (4.) Thus he got the benefit of their service in his own country, as Pharaoh did that of their fathers; and so this unworthy people were lost as they were found, and ended as they began, in servitude and under oppression. (5.) Thus he made room for those of his own country that had little, and little to do, at home, to settle in a good land, a land flowing with milk and honey. In all these several ways he served himself by this captivity of the ten tribes. We are here told in what places of his kingdom he disposed of them - in Halah and Habor, in places, we may suppose, far distant from each other, lest they should keep up a correspondence, incorporate again, and become formidable. There, we have reason to think, after some time they were so mingled with the nations that they were lost, and the name of Israel was no more in remembrance. Those that forgot God were themselves forgotten; those that studied to be like the nations were buried among them; and those that would not serve God in their own land were made to serve their enemies in a strange land. It is probable that they were the men of honour and estates who were carried captive, and that many of the meaner sort of people were left behind, many of every tribe, who either went over to Judah or became subject to the Assyrian colonies, and their posterity were Galileans or Samaritans. But thus ended Israel as a nation; now they became Lo-ammi - not a people, and Lo-ruhamah - unpitied. Now Canaan spued them out. When we read of their entry under Hoshea the son of Nun who would have thought that such as this should be their exit under Hoshea the son of Elah? Thus Rome's glory in Augustus sunk, many ages after, in Augustulus. Providence so ordered the eclipsing of the honour of the ten tribes that the honour of Judah (the royal tribe) and Levi (the holy tribe), which yet remained, might shine the brighter. Yet we find a number sealed of every one of the twelve tribes (Rev. 7) except Dan. James writes to the twelve tribes scattered abroad (Jam 1:1) and Paul speaks of the twelve tribes which instantly served God day and night (Act 26:7); so that though we never read of those that were carried captive, nor have any reason to credit the conjecture of some (that they yet remain a distinct body in some remote corner of the world), yet a remnant of them did escape, to keep up the name of Israel, till it came to be worn by the gospel church, the spiritual Israel, in which it will ever remain, Gal 6:16.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 1–6. Public domain.
Copy as
John ChrysostomAD 407
HOMILIES ON THE GOSPEL OF JOHN 31.2
At this point it is also appropriate to tell where the Samaritans originated. I say this because the entire region is called Samaria. From what source, then, did they derive this name? The mountain is called Semer from the man who had taken possession of it, as Isaiah also said: “And the head of Samaria, Ephraim.” The inhabitants, however, were called not Samaritans but Israelites. But as time went on, they transgressed against God, and during the reign of Pekah, Tiglath-pileser went up and seized many cities. After attacking and killing Elah, he gave the kingdom over to Hoshea. Later, Shalmaneser came and captured other cities and made them subject and tributary. However, though Hoshea at first yielded, he revolted afterwards from subjection and took refuge in the aid of the Ethiopians. The Assyrian learned this and, having made an expedition and taken them captive, forbade the nation to remain there any longer, because he suspected the possibility of another such revolt. These inhabitants, moreover, he transported to Babylon and Medea and, having brought from various regions the people dwelling in that vicinity, he caused them to dwell in Samaria so that his power might be safeguarded for the future, with loyal inhabitants in possession of the place.When these things had taken place, God, wishing to show his power and that he had given over the Jews not because of any lack of power on his part but because of the sins of those whom he had surrendered to their enemies, sent lions on the barbarians, and these preyed on the entire nation. This was reported to the king, and he sent a certain priest to give to them the laws of God. Nevertheless, not even then were they freed entirely from their impiety, but only partly. However, as time went on they turned away from idols and worshiped God. When things had reached this point, the Jews, finally returning, showed a contentious spirit toward them as foreigners and enemies and named them “Samaritans” after the mountain.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying 2 Kings 17:6 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.