Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
And Gera, and Shephuphan, and Huram.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
And Gera H1617, and Shephuphan H8197, and Huram H2361.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
Gera, Sh'fufan and Huram.
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
Gera, Shephuphan, and Huram.
Ask
American Standard Version
and Gera, and Shephuphan, and Huram.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
and Gera, and Shephuphan, and Huram.
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
And Gera, and Shephuphan, and Huram.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
and Gera, and Shephuphan, and Huram.
Ask
In the KJVVerse 10,581 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

1 Chronicles 8:5 precisely enumerates three prominent descendants of Benjamin—Gera, Shephuphan, and Huram—thereby continuing the meticulous genealogical record of this foundational tribe. Situated within a broader chapter dedicated to Benjamin's lineage, this verse functions to scrupulously document family structures and individual identities for the post-exilic Israelite community, underscoring the Chronicler's profound commitment to preserving the tribal heritage and affirming God's unwavering faithfulness in sustaining His covenant people.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: This verse is situated within 1 Chronicles 8, a chapter entirely devoted to the genealogy of the tribe of Benjamin. Chapters 1-9 of 1 Chronicles constitute a vast genealogical introduction, establishing the tribal identities, land inheritances, and the crucial lineage leading to King David. Specifically, 1 Chronicles 8:1-40 details various branches and family heads of Benjamin, often focusing on those who resided in Jerusalem or were prominent figures. Verse 5, with its simple listing of names, contributes to this comprehensive catalog, reinforcing the Chronicler's meticulous approach to documenting the continuity and structure of God's people. It transitions from broader familial strokes to more specific individuals, underscoring the granular thoroughness of the Chronicler's record.

  • Historical & Cultural Context: The Book of 1 Chronicles was likely compiled in the post-exilic period (c. 450-400 BCE), after the return of the Jewish people from Babylonian captivity. For this community, establishing and affirming their identity, tribal affiliations, and land rights was paramount. Genealogies were not merely historical curiosities; they were foundational legal and social documents. They determined who could serve in the priesthood, who could inherit land, and who belonged to the covenant community. The inclusion of seemingly exhaustive lists, such as the one in 1 Chronicles 8, reflects a deep cultural need to reconnect with their past, validate their present claims, and ensure the purity and order of their society. This meticulous record-keeping served as a tangible link to their pre-exilic heritage, a vital means of re-establishing communal order, and a profound testament to God's enduring covenant with Israel, even through periods of national upheaval.

  • Key Themes: The inclusion of 1 Chronicles 8:5, along with the broader genealogical sections, underscores several key themes. Firstly, it highlights Identity and Belonging, as these lists firmly establish who belonged to the twelve tribes of Israel, crucial for the returning exiles to re-establish their place and claim their heritage. Secondly, it speaks to Divine Faithfulness, demonstrating God's meticulous care in preserving His covenant people through generations, even amidst exile and dispersion. The continuity of these lineages, despite national catastrophes, points to God's unwavering commitment to His promises. Lastly, these genealogies emphasize Order and Structure within the community of Israel. Every individual, no matter how briefly mentioned, had a designated place within the larger tapestry of God's people, reflecting an underlying divine order and the importance of communal organization for the fulfillment of God's purposes, particularly in the re-establishment of the temple and its service, a central theme in 1 Chronicles.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • Gera (Hebrew, Gêrâʼ', H1617): This name (H1617), perhaps derived from a word meaning "a grain" or "a sojourner," appears elsewhere in the Old Testament, notably as the father of Ehud, a judge from Benjamin (Judges 3:15), and as the father of Shimei, a Benjaminite who cursed David (2 Samuel 16:5). In this context, Gera is presented as a distinct descendant of Benjamin, indicating the prevalence of this name within the tribe and the Chronicler's effort to trace specific family lines.

  • Shephuphan (Hebrew, Shᵉphûwphâm', H8197): This name (H8197), potentially meaning "serpent-like" or related to the viper (from the same root as shᵉphîphōn), is a variant of Shephupham, found in the census list of Numbers (Numbers 26:39), and possibly related to Shuppim, a son of Benjamin in Genesis (Genesis 46:21). The orthographic variations across different biblical lists highlight the fluidity of ancient Hebrew transcription and the possibility of different branches or appellations within a family being emphasized, while still pointing to the same lineage.

  • Huram (Hebrew, Chûwrâm', H2361): Meaning "whiteness," implying "noble" or "noble-born" (H2361), Huram is a common Semitic name. While famously associated with Huram, King of Tyre (1 Kings 5:1), and Huram-abi, the skilled craftsman who assisted in building Solomon's temple (2 Chronicles 2:13), here it refers to a distinct individual within the Benjaminite lineage. Its inclusion underscores the Chronicler's comprehensive documentation of the tribe's descendants.

Verse Breakdown

  • "And Gera": This phrase introduces the first of three individuals listed in this verse. The conjunction "And" (וְ, ) serves to connect this name to the preceding genealogical entries, indicating a continuation of the detailed lineage of Benjamin's descendants. It signifies Gera's place as a distinct and recognized member of the tribal family, contributing to the comprehensive record.

  • "and Shephuphan": The addition of "and Shephuphan" further expands the list, demonstrating the Chronicler's meticulous effort to record as many family heads or significant individuals as possible. This repetition of the conjunction emphasizes each name individually while binding them together as part of the same genealogical branch, reinforcing the communal identity.

  • "and Huram": The final name in this verse, "and Huram," completes the trio. The cumulative effect of these simple listings is to create a comprehensive and exhaustive record, highlighting the importance of each individual's identity and their specific place within the larger tribal structure of Benjamin, thereby reinforcing the thoroughness of the Chronicler's genealogical work and the divine order within the community.

Literary Devices

The primary literary device employed in 1 Chronicles 8:5 is Enumeration, specifically a simple listing of names. This technique is characteristic of genealogical texts throughout the Bible, serving to convey a sense of thoroughness and historical continuity. The repeated use of the conjunction "and" before each name, a figure of speech known as Polysyndeton, emphasizes the distinctness of each individual while simultaneously linking them together as part of the same lineage. This creates a rhythmic, cumulative effect, underscoring the meticulous nature of the record. The overarching literary form is Genealogy, which in Chronicles is not merely a dry list but a theological statement affirming God's covenant faithfulness, the preservation of His people, and the legitimate claim to land and heritage for the post-exilic community.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

While a simple list of names, 1 Chronicles 8:5 profoundly contributes to the theological message of the Chronicler. It underscores God's meticulous attention to detail and His unwavering faithfulness in preserving His covenant people through history. The very act of recording these names, even seemingly obscure ones, speaks to the divine value placed on every individual within the community of faith. It affirms that God knows His people by name and orchestrates their history, ensuring the continuity of the lineage through which His redemptive plan would unfold. This meticulous record-keeping served to reassure the post-exilic community of their identity and their place in God's ongoing narrative, reminding them that they were not forgotten but were part of a divinely ordered heritage.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

At first glance, a verse like 1 Chronicles 8:5 might seem like a dry, irrelevant list of names. However, when viewed through the lens of its original context and theological purpose, it becomes a powerful reminder of enduring truths. This verse, part of an extensive genealogical record, teaches us the profound importance of heritage and continuity within God's people. Just as Gera, Shephuphan, and Huram were integral, named individuals within the larger tapestry of the tribe of Benjamin, so too is every believer an indispensable part of God's spiritual family, the Church. It underscores that God values each individual, knowing us by name and weaving our lives into His grand narrative of redemption. This should encourage us to find our place within the ongoing story of God's faithfulness, appreciating the rich heritage of faith passed down through generations, and recognizing that our lives, no matter how seemingly small, contribute to His eternal purposes. It calls us to consider our own identity in Christ and our belonging within His body, understanding that we are part of a lineage not of blood, but of faith.

Questions for Reflection

  • How does understanding the importance of ancient genealogies help us appreciate our own spiritual heritage in Christ?
  • In what ways does this seemingly simple verse affirm God's meticulous care for every individual, even those briefly mentioned in Scripture?
  • What does the Chronicler's emphasis on lineage teach us about the significance of continuity and belonging within the community of faith today?

FAQ

Why are these genealogies so detailed in Chronicles?

Answer: The genealogies in Chronicles are meticulously detailed for several crucial reasons, particularly for the post-exilic community. They served to establish and confirm tribal identities, validate land claims, ensure the purity of priestly lineages for temple service, and affirm God's covenant faithfulness to His people despite the exile. By meticulously tracing these lines, the Chronicler provided a vital link to Israel's past, legitimizing the present community's claims and reassuring them of their place within God's ongoing redemptive plan. They were foundational for re-establishing social, religious, and political order after the return from Babylon, as seen in the emphasis on lineage in books like Nehemiah 7:5.

Are these names mentioned elsewhere in the Bible?

Answer: Yes, some of these names or their variants appear elsewhere. Gera is a Benjaminite name found in other contexts, such as the father of Ehud in Judges 3:15 and the father of Shimei in 2 Samuel 16:5. Shephuphan is a variant of Shephupham, mentioned in Numbers 26:39, and possibly related to Shuppim in Genesis 46:21. Huram is also a common name, notably borne by King Huram of Tyre (1 Kings 5:1) and a skilled craftsman (2 Chronicles 2:13), though the Huram in this verse is a distinct Benjaminite descendant. These variations and repetitions highlight the commonality of names and the intricate nature of ancient genealogical records.

What is the spiritual significance of a verse like this?

Answer: The spiritual significance of 1 Chronicles 8:5 lies in its affirmation of God's meticulous attention to detail and His unwavering faithfulness. It reminds us that every individual, even those briefly mentioned, matters to God and has a place in His grand narrative. This verse underscores the importance of identity and belonging within God's covenant people, a theme that resonates deeply with believers today who are grafted into the spiritual family of God through Christ. It testifies to God's preservation of His people through history, ensuring the continuity of the lineage through which the Messiah would ultimately come, thus demonstrating His sovereign control over seemingly mundane details to fulfill His overarching redemptive plan.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

While 1 Chronicles 8:5 appears to be a simple list of names, its Christ-centered fulfillment is profound, as it contributes to the overarching biblical narrative of God's meticulous preservation of a lineage leading to the Messiah. The Chronicler's exhaustive genealogical records, including seemingly minor verses like this one, testify to God's sovereign hand orchestrating human history to ensure the arrival of His Son. Every name, every family branch, was providentially maintained to preserve the line of Abraham and David, culminating in Jesus Christ. The ultimate purpose of these ancient genealogies finds its climax in the New Testament accounts of Christ's lineage, as seen in Matthew 1:1-17 and Luke 3:23-38. Through Christ, the meticulous record-keeping of physical lineage is transcended by a new, spiritual family. Believers, regardless of their earthly heritage, are now grafted into God's family by faith in Jesus, becoming children of God (John 1:12) and co-heirs with Christ (Romans 8:17). Thus, the divine care evident in preserving the names of Gera, Shephuphan, and Huram foreshadows the ultimate precision with which God brought forth the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world, establishing a new and eternal covenant family.

Copy as

Commentary on 1 Chronicles 8 verses 1–32

There is little or nothing of history in all these verses; we have not therefore much to observe. 1. As to the difficulties that occur in this and the foregoing genealogies we need not perplex ourselves. I presume Ezra took them as he found them in the books of the kings of Israel and Judah (Ezr 9:1), according as they were given in by the several tribes, each observing what method they thought fit. Hence some ascend, others desecnd; some have numbers affixed, others places; some have historical remarks intermixed, others have not; some are shorter, others longer; some agree with other records, others differ; some, it is likely, were torn, erased, and blotted, others more legible. Those of Dan and Reuben were entirely lost. This holy man wrote as he was moved by the Holy Ghost; but there was no necessity for the making up of the defects, no, nor for the rectifying of the mistakes, of these genealogies by inspiration. It was sufficient that he copied them out as they came into his hand, or so much of them as was requisite to the present purpose, which was the directing of the returned captives to settle as nearly as they could with those of their own family, and in the places of their former residence. We may suppose that many things in these genealogies which to us seem intricate, abrupt, and perplexed, were plain and easy to them then (who knew how to fill up the deficiencies) and abundantly answered the intention of the publishing of them. 2. Many great and mighty nations there were now in being upon earth, and many illustrious men in them, whose names are buried in perpetual oblivion, while the names of multitudes of the Israel of God are here carefully preserved in everlasting remembrance. They are Jasher, Jeshurun - just ones, and the memory of the just is blessed. Many of these we have reason to fear, came short of everlasting honour (for even the wicked kings of Judah come into the genealogy), yet the perpetuating of their names here was a figure of the writing of the names of all God's spiritual Israel in the Lamb's book of life. 3. This tribe of Benjamin was once brought to a very low ebb, in the time of the judges, upon the occasion of the iniquity of Gibeah, when only 600 men escaped the sword of justice; and yet, in these genealogies, it makes as good a figure as almost any of the tribes: for it is the honour of God to help the weakest and raise up those that are most diminished and abased. 4. Here is mention of one Ehud (Ch1 8:6), in the preceding verse of one Gera (Ch1 8:5) and (Ch1 8:8) of one that descended from him, that begat children in the country of Moab, which inclines me to think it was that Ehud who was the second of the judges of Israel; for he is said to be the son of Gera and a Benjamite (Jdg 3:15), and he delivered Israel from the oppression of the Moabites by killing the king of Moab, which might give him a greater sway in the country of Moab than we find evidence of in his history and might occasion some of his posterity to settle there. 5. Here is mention of some of the Benjamites that drove away the inhabitants of Gath (Ch1 8:13), perhaps those that had slain the Ephraimites (Ch1 7:21) or their posterity, by way of reprisal: and one of those that did this piece of justice was named Beriah too, that name in which the memorial of that injury was preserved. 6. Particular notice is taken of those that dwelt in Jerusalem (Ch1 8:28 and again Ch1 8:32), that those whose ancestors had had their residence there might thereby be induced, at their return from captivity, to settle there too, which, for aught that appears, few were willing to do, because it was the post of danger: and therefore we find (Neh 11:2) the people blessed those that willingly offered themselves to dwell at Jerusalem, the greater part being inclined to prefer the cities of Judah. Those whose godly parents had their conversation in the new Jerusalem should thereby be engaged to set their faces thitherward and pursue the way thither, whatever it cost them.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 1–32. Public domain.
Copy as
Theodoret of CyrusAD 458
QUESTIONS ON FIRST CHRONICLES, PROLOGUE
The Chronicles also speak about the tabernacle because a temple of the Lord had not yet been built by either Samuel or David. The text also adds that that the holy services were held in the tabernacle. Worship was observed at that time according to the number of the days of the week. For it also says, “and their kindred who were in their villages were obliged to come in every seven days, in turn, to be with them.” With regard to the holy utensils it says, “Some of them had charge of the utensils of service, for they were required to count them when they were brought in and taken out. Others of them were appointed over the furniture, and over all the holy utensils, also over the choice flour, the wine, the oil, the incense and the spices.” And about the priests it says, “Others, of the sons of the priests, prepared the mixing of the spices.” With regard to the tomb of Saul the Chronicles gives us much information, and in the Book of Kings itself we read that his bones were gathered and buried in the land of Jabesh.
Theodoret of CyrusAD 458
QUESTIONS ON 1 CHRONICLES, PROLOGUE
There is abundant information in the books of Chronicles which were written to continue the books of the Kings and to preserve the memory of such important events. The first book begins with a genealogy that sets out to demonstrate how the human race came from a single man. Since it focuses only on the single kingdom of Judah, it can tell us about its cities and the villages, and from where they took their names. Here we come to know Nathan, from whom the blessed Luke constructed the beginning of his genealogy of our Lord and Savior, Son of David and Solomon’s brother4 on his mother’s side: “The following children were born to him in Jerusalem: Shimeah, Shobab, Nathan and Solomon, that is, the four children he fathered with Bersabea, daughter of Ammiel.” And Rechab6 herself, who is mentioned in many books of Scripture, is said to have come from the tribe of Judah.It also clearly explains why Reuben lost his birthright and Joseph gained it and also, finally, the reason why the tribe of Judah obtained the highest honor: “The sons of Reuben the firstborn of Israel. He was the firstborn, but because he defiled his father’s bed his birthright was given to the sons of Joseph son of Israel, so that he is not enrolled in the genealogy according to the birthright; though Judah became prominent among his brothers and a ruler came from him, yet the birthright belonged to Joseph.” It also explains the reason why such a great honor was conceded to Joseph. By the will of God Judah had the dignity of receiving the Lord who was born from him according to the flesh. This is the sense tacitly expressed with the words “a leader from him.” Indeed the passage seems to assert that not only the kings of the earth derived from Judah, but also the eternal king himself who had no beginning and will never end.
It also describes the situation of the tribes beyond the Jordan, those of Reuben and Gad, and even the tribes of Manasseh which later were received into those of the Hagarites and the Itureans, and talks about the tribes of the Naphiseans, and all those peoples who entered into conflict with them. In addition the text relates how they fought and won, and made the Hagarites flee. And it also reports the reason for the victory: “When they received help against them, the Hagarites and all who were with them were given into their hands, for they cried to God in the battle, and he granted their entreaty because they trusted in him.” It also describes the amount of the spoils of war: “They captured their livestock: 50, of their camels, 250, sheep, 2, donkeys and 100, captives. Many were slain because the war was from God. And they lived in their territory until the exile.”
Theodoret of CyrusAD 458
QUESTIONS ON 1 CHRONICLES, PROLOGUE
The genealogy of the priests and the Levites comes after this. It relates that Zadok, who was high priest at the time of David, had been the eleventh from Aaron; that Azariah, nephew of Zadok, had been the first to receive the priestly anointing in the temple built by Solomon. Among them there was also Jehozadak, who was brought to Babylon as a war prisoner. Jesus9 was his son, a high priest as well, who delivered the people from bondage together with Zerubbabel, and built a temple for the Lord. Here we also learn that Korah, who revolted against the great Moses, was a nephew of Isaar, son of Caath and brother of Amram, Aaron’s and Moses’ father. According to this lineage he was related to the first legislator. But he himself paid in the desert for his errors, although his children did not share the punishment of their father. From here Samuel13 came and then Aeman, who intoned Psalms and was a nephew of the prophet Samuel. In fact he was the son of Joel, son of Samuel. On the other hand, Asaph, one of the singers, came from the lineage of Gerson, son of Levi and brother of Caath. Aetham, who also belonged to the group of the singers, had Merari, the third son of Levi, as great-grandfather.The text also explains the difference between the priests and the Levites. It relates that the Levites were initiated into all the ministries of the holy altar of God: “But Aaron and his sons made offerings on the altar of burnt offering and on the altar of incense, doing all the work of the most holy place, to make atonement for Israel, according to all that Moses the servant of God had commanded.” It seems to me, in fact, that this book was written after the return from Babylon. For this reason it also talks about the bondage and explains its cause: “So all Israel was enrolled by genealogies; and these are written in the book of the Kings of Israel. And Judah was taken into exile in Babylon because of their unfaithfulness. Now the first to live again in their possessions in their towns were Israelites, priests, Levites, and temple servants.” These accounts show that the book was begun after the captivity. Indeed no historian ever relates facts that happened afterwards, but what happened before or during his times. And actually only the prophets have the power to foretell the future. In addition it says that also those who had inhabited that land before them had been enslaved. And actually many of them still live with them: the Canaanites, Chettites, Jebusites, who had been their companions in such a misfortune. Also the priests and the Levites were brought into captivity with the Israelites. I believe that those who were called “the saints’ servants” were then called Nathinim. Many of them, in fact, consecrated themselves to the ministries of the priests and the Levites. There were among them also those who were entrusted with the carrying of the water, the gathering of wood and other necessary duties. Indeed, if it was imposed to the Gabaonites, who were foreigners, to follow Joshua in the praises and to perform some works as porters or carpenters, this task was even more the duty of the Israelites. As a proof of this I have found in the interpretation of Hebrew names that this name means “house of Iaō,” that is, “of the God who is.” The text, in fact, mentions the children of Israel and among them Judah and Benjamin, and Ephraim18 and Manasseh. It also mentions the priests and the Levites, who inhabited those cities. About the Korēnites it says that they derived from Korah. It also says that among them there had been the guardians of the temple of God as well, and it seems that this custom had been introduced by Samuel and David. “All these, who were chosen as gatekeepers at the thresholds, were two hundred twelve. They were enrolled by genealogies in their villages. David and the prophet Samuel established them in their office of trust. So they and their descendants were in charge of the gates of the house of the Lord, that is, the house of the tent, as guards. The gatekeepers were on the four sides, east, west, north, and south.”
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying 1 Chronicles 8:5 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.