Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
And Abishua, and Naaman, and Ahoah,
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
And Abishua H50, and Naaman H5283, and Ahoah H265,
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
Avishua, Na'aman, Achoach,
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
Addar, Gera, Abihud, Abishua, Naaman, Ahoah,
Ask
American Standard Version
and Abishua, and Naaman, and Ahoah,
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
and Abishua, and Naaman, and Ahoah,
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
And Abishua, and Naaman and Ahoah,
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
and Abihud, and Abishua, and Naaman, and Ahoah,
Ask
In the KJVVerse 10,580 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

1 Chronicles 8:4 is a concise yet significant verse nestled within the extensive genealogical records of the tribe of Benjamin, meticulously detailing a segment of Benjamin's descendants. It precisely names three individuals—Abishua, Naaman, and Ahoah—as integral links in the intricate family tree of Israel. This verse, devoid of narrative embellishment, serves as a foundational element in the Chronicler's diligent effort to preserve and affirm tribal identity, heritage, and the unbroken continuity of God's covenant promises to His people in the post-exilic era.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: This verse is situated within a lengthy and detailed genealogical section spanning 1 Chronicles 8:1-40, which meticulously traces the lineage of the tribe of Benjamin. Following the comprehensive genealogies of Judah and Levi in previous chapters, the Chronicler turns his attention to the remaining tribes, with a particular emphasis on Benjamin due to its historical significance (e.g., King Saul's tribe) and its eventual integration with Judah. Verse 4 specifically lists three names as part of the lineage stemming from Benjamin, connecting them to the broader family structure outlined in the preceding verses, which begin with Benjamin's sons and their descendants. The repetitive nature of name lists within this chapter underscores the Chronicler's primary objective: to establish and validate the identity and heritage of the returning exiles, ensuring their rightful place within the restored community.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: The book of 1 Chronicles was written in the post-exilic period, likely between 450-400 BC, for a community that had returned from Babylonian captivity. This audience faced the daunting task of rebuilding their nation, re-establishing their identity, and re-affirming their covenant relationship with God. In ancient Israel, genealogies were not mere historical curiosities; they were vital legal and social documents. They validated claims to land inheritance, priestly service, tribal affiliation, and even the right to participate in the community. The meticulous recording of names like Abishua, Naaman, and Ahoah provided crucial evidence of an individual's place within the collective, ensuring that the continuity of God's people and His promises, particularly those related to the land and the Davidic covenant, remained tangible and verifiable for a people seeking to re-anchor themselves in their past and future.
  • Key Themes: The inclusion of 1 Chronicles 8:4, alongside the broader genealogical sections, contributes significantly to several overarching themes in 1 Chronicles. Foremost is the theme of Continuity and Preservation, demonstrating God's faithfulness in maintaining the tribal lines despite centuries of history, including periods of apostasy and exile, ensuring the nation's spiritual and physical survival (compare the importance of records in Nehemiah 7:61-64). This meticulous record also highlights the Importance of Identity and Heritage, providing a sense of rootedness and belonging for the returning exiles by connecting them to their ancestral past and God's covenant promises (as seen in Ezra 2:59-63). Furthermore, the Chronicler's attention to detail, even in seemingly minor names, implicitly underscores Divine Providence and Sovereignty, assuring readers that God is meticulously overseeing every aspect of history, including the most minute details of family lines, to fulfill His grand redemptive purposes, ultimately culminating in the Davidic line and the Messiah (a theme powerfully articulated in 2 Samuel 7:12-16).

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • Abishua (Hebrew, ʼĂbîyshûwaʻ, H50): This name is derived from the Hebrew words for "father" (ʼāb) and "plenty" or "prosperity" (shôwaʻ). Thus, it carries the meaning "father of plenty" or "prosperous father." In ancient Israelite culture, names often reflected hopes, prayers, or characteristics. This name could signify a family's aspiration for abundance, a recognition of God's provision, or perhaps commemorate a period of prosperity in the family line.
  • Naaman (Hebrew, Naʻămân, H5283): This name means "pleasantness" or "graciousness," stemming from a root that conveys the idea of being pleasing or delightful. While the most famous biblical Naaman is the Syrian commander healed by Elisha (as recorded in 2 Kings 5:1), the individual mentioned here is a distinct figure within the Benjaminite genealogy. The name suggests a desired positive attribute or a characteristic associated with the individual or their family.
  • Ahoah (Hebrew, ʼĂchôwach, H265): This name is described as being derived by reduplication from the Hebrew word for "brother" (ʼāch), thus meaning "brotherly." Such a name could indicate a strong emphasis on kinship, fraternal bonds, or a desire for unity within the family or tribal unit. It highlights the importance of familial relationships and solidarity within the Israelite community.

Verse Breakdown

  • "And Abishua, and Naaman, and Ahoah,": This simple enumeration serves as a direct continuation of the genealogical list that began in 1 Chronicles 8:1. Each name represents a distinct individual within the Benjaminite lineage, serving as a crucial link in the chain of descent from Benjamin. The repeated conjunction "and" (Hebrew: "waw") emphasizes the additive nature of the list, connecting each person as a successive or co-existent member of the family tree. In a genealogical context, the inclusion of these names, even without further narrative, affirms their existence and their specific place within the tribal structure, validating their identity and heritage for the post-exilic community. Their very presence in this sacred record underscores the Chronicler's meticulous attention to detail in preserving the historical and tribal continuity of Israel, ensuring that no vital link in the covenant line was lost or forgotten.

Literary Devices

The primary literary device at play in 1 Chronicles 8:4, and indeed throughout much of 1 Chronicles 8, is Enumeration, where a list of names is presented sequentially. This technique is fundamental to Genealogy as a literary form, which serves to establish lineage, validate claims, and demonstrate continuity across generations. The repeated use of the conjunction "and" before each name (e.g., "And Abishua, and Naaman, and Ahoah") is a classic example of Polysyndeton, which, while simple, creates a sense of exhaustive listing and emphasizes the individual contribution of each name to the overall record, giving weight and distinctness to each person mentioned. Furthermore, the very act of listing names, particularly those with inherent meanings (as explored in the Key Word Analysis), implicitly engages in Onomastics, the study of names, which in ancient cultures often carried symbolic weight, reflected aspirations for the individual, or commemorated significant events. The Chronicler's choice to include these specific names, even without accompanying narratives, highlights their significance as foundational elements in the tribal identity and the broader historical tapestry of God's people.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

While 1 Chronicles 8:4 may appear to be a dry list of names, its theological significance lies in its profound contribution to the broader theme of God's unwavering faithfulness to His covenant promises. The meticulous preservation of these genealogies, even for seemingly obscure individuals, underscores God's sovereignty over history and His commitment to maintaining a people through whom His redemptive plan would unfold. Each name, however brief its mention, represents a vital thread in the tapestry of God's ongoing relationship with Israel, affirming that no detail of His people's existence escapes His divine oversight. This attention to lineage ultimately points to the preservation of the Davidic line, through which the Messiah would come, demonstrating God's long-term purpose for salvation and His meticulous care for every generation.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

In a world that often values prominence and immediate impact, 1 Chronicles 8:4 reminds us that God's perspective is far more encompassing. The inclusion of names like Abishua, Naaman, and Ahoah, without accompanying stories of great deeds, highlights God's meticulous care for every individual within His grand narrative. It teaches us that our worth is not solely defined by our public achievements or recognition, but by our very existence as part of God's family and His ongoing story. This verse encourages us to value our own heritage, both physical and spiritual, and to recognize that even our seemingly small contributions are significant in the eyes of a God who oversees every detail. It invites us to find our place within the larger household of faith, understanding that we are connected to a lineage of believers, past, present, and future, all sustained by God's enduring faithfulness. Our lives, no matter how ordinary they may seem, are woven into God's extraordinary plan.

Questions for Reflection

  • How does the meticulous detail of biblical genealogies, like 1 Chronicles 8:4, challenge our modern emphasis on individual achievement and fame?
  • In what ways does understanding your own spiritual heritage (your family of faith, the history of the church) provide you with a sense of identity and belonging?
  • What does God's attention to seemingly "minor" names in a long list reveal about His character and His care for every individual?
  • How can we live in a way that honors our place within God's ongoing story, even if our contributions feel small or unnoticed by the world?

FAQ

Why are genealogies so important in the Bible, especially in books like 1 Chronicles?

Answer: Genealogies in the Bible serve multiple crucial purposes. For the post-exilic community, as in 1 Chronicles, they were vital for re-establishing tribal identity and land claims after the Babylonian exile, ensuring that families could trace their lineage back to their ancestral lands and inheritances. They also validated claims to priestly service (for the Levites) and royal lineage (for the Davidic line), which was essential for the continuity of the covenant and the expectation of the Messiah. Furthermore, genealogies demonstrate the fulfillment of God's promises, showing how His covenant with Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob was faithfully preserved through generations, even through periods of hardship and exile. They provide a historical framework, connecting individuals to the larger narrative of God's redemptive plan, underscoring His sovereignty over history and His meticulous attention to every detail of His people's existence, as seen in the careful listing of names like Abishua, Naaman, and Ahoah in 1 Chronicles 8:4.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

While 1 Chronicles 8:4, with its simple listing of names, does not directly prophesy Christ, it contributes profoundly to the broader Christ-centered narrative by affirming God's meticulous preservation of lineage, which ultimately culminates in the Messiah. The Chronicler's emphasis on unbroken lines, even for seemingly minor figures like Abishua, Naaman, and Ahoah, underscores God's unwavering faithfulness to His covenant promises, particularly the promise of a perpetual kingdom through David's seed (as seen in 2 Samuel 7:12-16). This divine commitment to lineage finds its ultimate fulfillment in Jesus Christ, whose own genealogies in the New Testament (e.g., Matthew 1:1-17 and Luke 3:23-38) meticulously trace His descent, demonstrating His rightful claim as the promised Son of David and the heir to God's eternal throne. Thus, these Old Testament genealogies, far from being mere historical records, serve as a testament to God's providential hand guiding history towards the arrival of the one who would establish a new spiritual lineage—a family of faith, where all who believe, regardless of their physical ancestry, become children of God through Christ (as powerfully articulated in Galatians 3:26-29 and John 1:12-13).

Copy as

Commentary on 1 Chronicles 8 verses 1–32

There is little or nothing of history in all these verses; we have not therefore much to observe. 1. As to the difficulties that occur in this and the foregoing genealogies we need not perplex ourselves. I presume Ezra took them as he found them in the books of the kings of Israel and Judah (Ezr 9:1), according as they were given in by the several tribes, each observing what method they thought fit. Hence some ascend, others desecnd; some have numbers affixed, others places; some have historical remarks intermixed, others have not; some are shorter, others longer; some agree with other records, others differ; some, it is likely, were torn, erased, and blotted, others more legible. Those of Dan and Reuben were entirely lost. This holy man wrote as he was moved by the Holy Ghost; but there was no necessity for the making up of the defects, no, nor for the rectifying of the mistakes, of these genealogies by inspiration. It was sufficient that he copied them out as they came into his hand, or so much of them as was requisite to the present purpose, which was the directing of the returned captives to settle as nearly as they could with those of their own family, and in the places of their former residence. We may suppose that many things in these genealogies which to us seem intricate, abrupt, and perplexed, were plain and easy to them then (who knew how to fill up the deficiencies) and abundantly answered the intention of the publishing of them. 2. Many great and mighty nations there were now in being upon earth, and many illustrious men in them, whose names are buried in perpetual oblivion, while the names of multitudes of the Israel of God are here carefully preserved in everlasting remembrance. They are Jasher, Jeshurun - just ones, and the memory of the just is blessed. Many of these we have reason to fear, came short of everlasting honour (for even the wicked kings of Judah come into the genealogy), yet the perpetuating of their names here was a figure of the writing of the names of all God's spiritual Israel in the Lamb's book of life. 3. This tribe of Benjamin was once brought to a very low ebb, in the time of the judges, upon the occasion of the iniquity of Gibeah, when only 600 men escaped the sword of justice; and yet, in these genealogies, it makes as good a figure as almost any of the tribes: for it is the honour of God to help the weakest and raise up those that are most diminished and abased. 4. Here is mention of one Ehud (Ch1 8:6), in the preceding verse of one Gera (Ch1 8:5) and (Ch1 8:8) of one that descended from him, that begat children in the country of Moab, which inclines me to think it was that Ehud who was the second of the judges of Israel; for he is said to be the son of Gera and a Benjamite (Jdg 3:15), and he delivered Israel from the oppression of the Moabites by killing the king of Moab, which might give him a greater sway in the country of Moab than we find evidence of in his history and might occasion some of his posterity to settle there. 5. Here is mention of some of the Benjamites that drove away the inhabitants of Gath (Ch1 8:13), perhaps those that had slain the Ephraimites (Ch1 7:21) or their posterity, by way of reprisal: and one of those that did this piece of justice was named Beriah too, that name in which the memorial of that injury was preserved. 6. Particular notice is taken of those that dwelt in Jerusalem (Ch1 8:28 and again Ch1 8:32), that those whose ancestors had had their residence there might thereby be induced, at their return from captivity, to settle there too, which, for aught that appears, few were willing to do, because it was the post of danger: and therefore we find (Neh 11:2) the people blessed those that willingly offered themselves to dwell at Jerusalem, the greater part being inclined to prefer the cities of Judah. Those whose godly parents had their conversation in the new Jerusalem should thereby be engaged to set their faces thitherward and pursue the way thither, whatever it cost them.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 1–32. Public domain.
Copy as
Theodoret of CyrusAD 458
QUESTIONS ON FIRST CHRONICLES, PROLOGUE
The Chronicles also speak about the tabernacle because a temple of the Lord had not yet been built by either Samuel or David. The text also adds that that the holy services were held in the tabernacle. Worship was observed at that time according to the number of the days of the week. For it also says, “and their kindred who were in their villages were obliged to come in every seven days, in turn, to be with them.” With regard to the holy utensils it says, “Some of them had charge of the utensils of service, for they were required to count them when they were brought in and taken out. Others of them were appointed over the furniture, and over all the holy utensils, also over the choice flour, the wine, the oil, the incense and the spices.” And about the priests it says, “Others, of the sons of the priests, prepared the mixing of the spices.” With regard to the tomb of Saul the Chronicles gives us much information, and in the Book of Kings itself we read that his bones were gathered and buried in the land of Jabesh.
Theodoret of CyrusAD 458
QUESTIONS ON 1 CHRONICLES, PROLOGUE
There is abundant information in the books of Chronicles which were written to continue the books of the Kings and to preserve the memory of such important events. The first book begins with a genealogy that sets out to demonstrate how the human race came from a single man. Since it focuses only on the single kingdom of Judah, it can tell us about its cities and the villages, and from where they took their names. Here we come to know Nathan, from whom the blessed Luke constructed the beginning of his genealogy of our Lord and Savior, Son of David and Solomon’s brother4 on his mother’s side: “The following children were born to him in Jerusalem: Shimeah, Shobab, Nathan and Solomon, that is, the four children he fathered with Bersabea, daughter of Ammiel.” And Rechab6 herself, who is mentioned in many books of Scripture, is said to have come from the tribe of Judah.It also clearly explains why Reuben lost his birthright and Joseph gained it and also, finally, the reason why the tribe of Judah obtained the highest honor: “The sons of Reuben the firstborn of Israel. He was the firstborn, but because he defiled his father’s bed his birthright was given to the sons of Joseph son of Israel, so that he is not enrolled in the genealogy according to the birthright; though Judah became prominent among his brothers and a ruler came from him, yet the birthright belonged to Joseph.” It also explains the reason why such a great honor was conceded to Joseph. By the will of God Judah had the dignity of receiving the Lord who was born from him according to the flesh. This is the sense tacitly expressed with the words “a leader from him.” Indeed the passage seems to assert that not only the kings of the earth derived from Judah, but also the eternal king himself who had no beginning and will never end.
It also describes the situation of the tribes beyond the Jordan, those of Reuben and Gad, and even the tribes of Manasseh which later were received into those of the Hagarites and the Itureans, and talks about the tribes of the Naphiseans, and all those peoples who entered into conflict with them. In addition the text relates how they fought and won, and made the Hagarites flee. And it also reports the reason for the victory: “When they received help against them, the Hagarites and all who were with them were given into their hands, for they cried to God in the battle, and he granted their entreaty because they trusted in him.” It also describes the amount of the spoils of war: “They captured their livestock: 50, of their camels, 250, sheep, 2, donkeys and 100, captives. Many were slain because the war was from God. And they lived in their territory until the exile.”
Theodoret of CyrusAD 458
QUESTIONS ON 1 CHRONICLES, PROLOGUE
The genealogy of the priests and the Levites comes after this. It relates that Zadok, who was high priest at the time of David, had been the eleventh from Aaron; that Azariah, nephew of Zadok, had been the first to receive the priestly anointing in the temple built by Solomon. Among them there was also Jehozadak, who was brought to Babylon as a war prisoner. Jesus9 was his son, a high priest as well, who delivered the people from bondage together with Zerubbabel, and built a temple for the Lord. Here we also learn that Korah, who revolted against the great Moses, was a nephew of Isaar, son of Caath and brother of Amram, Aaron’s and Moses’ father. According to this lineage he was related to the first legislator. But he himself paid in the desert for his errors, although his children did not share the punishment of their father. From here Samuel13 came and then Aeman, who intoned Psalms and was a nephew of the prophet Samuel. In fact he was the son of Joel, son of Samuel. On the other hand, Asaph, one of the singers, came from the lineage of Gerson, son of Levi and brother of Caath. Aetham, who also belonged to the group of the singers, had Merari, the third son of Levi, as great-grandfather.The text also explains the difference between the priests and the Levites. It relates that the Levites were initiated into all the ministries of the holy altar of God: “But Aaron and his sons made offerings on the altar of burnt offering and on the altar of incense, doing all the work of the most holy place, to make atonement for Israel, according to all that Moses the servant of God had commanded.” It seems to me, in fact, that this book was written after the return from Babylon. For this reason it also talks about the bondage and explains its cause: “So all Israel was enrolled by genealogies; and these are written in the book of the Kings of Israel. And Judah was taken into exile in Babylon because of their unfaithfulness. Now the first to live again in their possessions in their towns were Israelites, priests, Levites, and temple servants.” These accounts show that the book was begun after the captivity. Indeed no historian ever relates facts that happened afterwards, but what happened before or during his times. And actually only the prophets have the power to foretell the future. In addition it says that also those who had inhabited that land before them had been enslaved. And actually many of them still live with them: the Canaanites, Chettites, Jebusites, who had been their companions in such a misfortune. Also the priests and the Levites were brought into captivity with the Israelites. I believe that those who were called “the saints’ servants” were then called Nathinim. Many of them, in fact, consecrated themselves to the ministries of the priests and the Levites. There were among them also those who were entrusted with the carrying of the water, the gathering of wood and other necessary duties. Indeed, if it was imposed to the Gabaonites, who were foreigners, to follow Joshua in the praises and to perform some works as porters or carpenters, this task was even more the duty of the Israelites. As a proof of this I have found in the interpretation of Hebrew names that this name means “house of Iaō,” that is, “of the God who is.” The text, in fact, mentions the children of Israel and among them Judah and Benjamin, and Ephraim18 and Manasseh. It also mentions the priests and the Levites, who inhabited those cities. About the Korēnites it says that they derived from Korah. It also says that among them there had been the guardians of the temple of God as well, and it seems that this custom had been introduced by Samuel and David. “All these, who were chosen as gatekeepers at the thresholds, were two hundred twelve. They were enrolled by genealogies in their villages. David and the prophet Samuel established them in their office of trust. So they and their descendants were in charge of the gates of the house of the Lord, that is, the house of the tent, as guards. The gatekeepers were on the four sides, east, west, north, and south.”
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying 1 Chronicles 8:4 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.