Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
¶ Now Benjamin begat Bela his firstborn, Ashbel the second, and Aharah the third,
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
Now Benjamin H1144 begat H3205 Bela H1106 his firstborn H1060, Ashbel H788 the second H8145, and Aharah H315 the third H7992,
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
Binyamin fathered Bela his firstborn son; his second, Ashbel; his third, Achrach;
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
Benjamin was the father of Bela, his firstborn; Ashbel was the second born, Aharah the third,
Ask
American Standard Version
And Benjamin begat Bela his first-born, Ashbel the second, and Aharah the third,
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
Benjamin became the father of Bela his firstborn, Ashbel the second, and Aharah the third,
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
Beniamin also begate Bela his eldest sonne, Ashbel the second, and Aharah the third,
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
And Benjamin begat Bela his first-born, Ashbel the second, and Aharah the third,
Ask
In the KJVVerse 10,577 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

1 Chronicles 8:1 initiates a comprehensive genealogical record of the tribe of Benjamin, meticulously listing Benjamin's first three sons: Bela, Ashbel, and Aharah. This foundational verse serves as a crucial entry within the Chronicler's broader objective to preserve and re-establish the tribal identities, historical lineage, and land claims of Israel, particularly for the community returning from Babylonian exile, thereby underscoring God's unwavering faithfulness to His covenant people through their generational continuity and the precise unfolding of His redemptive plan.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: This verse serves as the inaugural statement of 1 Chronicles chapter 8, a chapter uniquely and extensively devoted to the genealogy of the tribe of Benjamin. It follows seven preceding chapters that meticulously trace the lineages from Adam, through the patriarchs, and into various tribal lines, including Judah, Simeon, Reuben, Gad, and Manasseh. The Chronicler's work, which begins with the primordial human and progresses through the foundational families of Israel, aims to construct a comprehensive historical and theological framework for the post-exilic community. Chapter 8's intricate details of Benjamin's descendants, their dwelling places, and key figures, are not merely historical footnotes but serve a vital purpose: to re-establish tribal identity, validate land rights, and reinforce social order, all of which were crucial for the reordering of society and worship in the restored land. The shift from broad genealogical sweeps to such specific tribal detail highlights Benjamin's significance, likely due to its strategic proximity to Jerusalem and its historical role in the kingdom's formation and subsequent history.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: The book of 1 Chronicles was most likely compiled during the post-exilic period, roughly between 450-400 BC, for the Jewish community that had returned to Judah from their Babylonian captivity. This community faced immense challenges in re-establishing their national identity, reclaiming ancestral land, and revitalizing their religious practices after decades of displacement and cultural assimilation. In this context, genealogies were far more than simple historical records; they functioned as vital legal, social, and religious documents. They were indispensable for determining legitimate inheritance, confirming tribal affiliation, establishing eligibility for priestly or Levitical service, and even arranging appropriate marriage alliances. The tribe of Benjamin held particular significance, having been an integral part of the Southern Kingdom of Judah, with the holy city of Jerusalem situated within its traditional territory. Its lineage was also notable for producing Israel's first king, Saul, and much later, the Apostle Paul. The meticulous recording of "begats" (Hebrew: yalad) profoundly reflected a deep cultural emphasis on patrilineal descent and the preservation of family lines, which were seen as the bedrock of national identity, continuity, and the fulfillment of God's covenant promises.
  • Key Themes: The meticulous listing of Benjamin's sons in this verse profoundly contributes to several overarching themes pervasive throughout the book of Chronicles. Foremost among these is The Importance of Lineage and Continuity, which powerfully demonstrates God's unwavering faithfulness in preserving His covenant people through countless generations, even in the wake of national trauma and exile. These genealogies were not merely backward-looking historical archives but forward-looking foundational documents, establishing who rightfully belonged to the covenant community and possessed a legitimate claim to the promised land and its blessings. This profound commitment to tracing family lines ultimately foreshadows and points toward the ultimate fulfillment of God's redemptive promises through a specific lineage, as supremely exemplified in the Davidic covenant and its culmination in the Messiah, the true Son of David (compare 2 Samuel 7:12-16). Furthermore, the precise focus on individual tribes like Benjamin underscores the critical importance of Tribal Identity and Organization, which was absolutely essential for the re-establishment of the nation's social, political, and religious order in the post-exilic era. The Chronicler's dedication to such precise records also emphasizes a commitment to Historical Accuracy and Divine Providence, reassuring the returning exiles that their history was not a series of random accidents but a divinely orchestrated narrative, with every individual and family having a specific and purposeful place in God's unfolding plan (see also Nehemiah 7).

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • Benjamin (Hebrew, Binyâmîyn', H1144): From the Hebrew words for "son" and "right hand," Benjamin means "son of the right hand" or "son of fortune." He was the youngest and favorite son of Jacob and Rachel, born near Bethlehem (see Genesis 35:18). The name carries significant theological weight, often associated with strength, favor, and a strategic position. The tribe of Benjamin was renowned for its fierce warriors (e.g., Judges 20:16) and its crucial geographical location, including parts of Jerusalem. In Chronicles, the detailed focus on Benjamin's lineage serves to re-establish the identity, historical claims, and vital role of a tribe that was integral to the Southern Kingdom and the post-exilic community's restoration.
  • begat (Hebrew, yâlad', H3205): This primitive Hebrew root verb is fundamental to biblical genealogies, meaning "to bear young," "to give birth," or "to beget." In the context of patrilineal genealogies, it denotes direct male descent, emphasizing the unbroken chain of generations from father to son. The repetitive use of yalad throughout the genealogies in Chronicles underscores the divine preservation of family lines and the meticulous record-keeping essential for establishing identity, inheritance, and covenant continuity within ancient Israel. It is a simple yet profound word that systematically constructs the entire historical and theological framework of the nation, linking past promises to future hopes.
  • Bela (Hebrew, Belaʻ', H1106): The name Bela means "swallowing" or "destruction," which could imply strength, power, or ferocity, as suggested by its use elsewhere in biblical contexts (e.g., a city name in Genesis 14:2). As Benjamin's firstborn son, Bela's lineage would have been of paramount importance for tribal leadership, inheritance rights, and the continuation of the family name. The Chronicler's explicit listing of him first establishes the primary and most significant line of descent for the tribe of Benjamin, from which further branches would extend.

Verse Breakdown

  • "Now Benjamin begat Bela his firstborn,": This opening clause immediately establishes the patriarch of the lineage being detailed—Benjamin—and introduces his eldest son, Bela. The verb "begat" (Hebrew yalad) signifies direct patrilineal descent, a cornerstone of all biblical genealogies. Bela, as the "firstborn," held a position of preeminence within the family and tribe, typically inheriting a double portion of the family's assets and assuming leadership responsibilities. His explicit mention here marks the primary branch of Benjamin's descendants that the Chronicler is about to meticulously trace.
  • "Ashbel the second,": This clause introduces the second son of Benjamin, Ashbel. While not holding the birthright, Ashbel's inclusion is vital for providing a complete and accurate record of Benjamin's direct male offspring. His name, possibly meaning "a man of God" or "fire of God," contributes to the rich tapestry of names within Israelite families, which often reflected hopes, circumstances, or divine associations. The meticulous enumeration of each son underscores the Chronicler's unwavering commitment to comprehensive and precise record-keeping, essential for the post-exilic community.
  • "and Aharah the third,": This final clause in the verse completes the initial enumeration by listing Benjamin's third son, Aharah. His name, possibly meaning "after brother" or "another brother," signifies the completion of Benjamin's immediate male progeny. The precise ordinal numbering ("firstborn," "second," "third") reinforces the structured, systematic, and exhaustive nature of the genealogical record, ensuring clarity, accuracy, and legal validity for the post-exilic community who relied on these lists for their identity, land claims, and social organization.

Literary Devices

The primary literary device at play in 1 Chronicles 8:1, and indeed throughout the initial chapters of Chronicles, is Genealogy. This is not merely a dry list of names but a structured and purposeful literary form that establishes historical continuity, validates tribal identity, and reinforces covenantal lineage. The repetitive use of the verb "begat" (יָלַד, yalad) creates a rhythmic, almost incantatory effect, emphasizing the unbroken and divinely preserved chain of generations. The precise enumeration of the sons ("firstborn," "second," "third") demonstrates Order and Precision, highlighting the Chronicler's meticulous and systematic approach to historical record-keeping, which was crucial for the post-exilic community. While not immediately apparent in this single verse, the broader genealogical sections employ Repetition of names, phrases, and structural patterns to reinforce the vastness, interconnectedness, and divine orchestration of Israel's family tree. The very act of listing these names also serves as a powerful form of Historical Validation, assuring the returning exiles of their legitimate heritage and their rightful place within God's enduring covenant people.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

1 Chronicles 8:1, despite its seemingly simple genealogical nature, is profoundly theological. It implicitly and explicitly affirms God's unwavering faithfulness to His covenant promises by demonstrating the miraculous preservation of Israel's tribal identity through centuries of upheaval, national decline, and the trauma of exile. The meticulous recording of lineages underscores the divine hand in history, ensuring that the covenant people remained distinct, traceable, and intact, ultimately pointing towards the fulfillment of promises concerning a specific "seed" or descendant. This verse serves as a powerful reminder that God works through generations, preserving a remnant and building His kingdom through the seemingly mundane, yet divinely orchestrated, details of family history. It is a testament to the fact that every individual, every family, has a purposeful place in God's grand narrative of redemption, demonstrating His sovereignty over time and human affairs.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

While a list of names from ancient history might initially seem distant to the modern reader, 1 Chronicles 8:1 offers profound and enduring insights into God's character and our own place within His unfolding story. It serves as a powerful reminder that God is a God of intricate detail, who meticulously cares for the lineage, identity, and destiny of His people. Just as Benjamin's descendants were carefully recorded and preserved, so too are our individual lives known, valued, and purposed by God. This passage encourages us to deeply appreciate our own heritage, whether physical lineage or spiritual inheritance through faith, and to recognize that we are part of a larger, ongoing narrative of God's faithfulness throughout history. It challenges us to consider how our lives, our choices, and our faithfulness contribute to the legacy of faith passed down through generations, and how we might faithfully steward that precious heritage for those who come after us. Ultimately, it calls us to find our deepest identity not merely in our personal achievements or earthly affiliations, but in our profound connection to God's covenant people and His majestic, unfolding plan for all humanity.

Questions for Reflection

  • How does the Chronicler's meticulous attention to genealogies, as powerfully demonstrated in this verse, speak to God's character and His intimate involvement in human history?
  • In what specific ways does understanding our own physical or spiritual lineage help us to better comprehend our identity, purpose, and calling within God's larger redemptive story?
  • What seemingly "insignificant details" in our lives or the lives of our families might actually be part of God's larger, providential plan, much like these ancient family records were for Israel?
  • How can we, as individuals and as a community of faith, more effectively steward the rich spiritual heritage we have received and intentionally pass it on to future generations in a meaningful way?

FAQ

Why are genealogies so important in the Bible, especially in books like 1 Chronicles?

Answer: Genealogies are profoundly crucial in the Bible for several interconnected reasons, particularly within the context of 1 Chronicles. Firstly, they establish identity and belonging for the people of Israel, which was especially vital for the post-exilic community who desperately needed to re-establish their tribal affiliations, validate their land claims, and confirm their eligibility for priestly or Levitical service (compare Ezra 2:62). Secondly, these genealogies powerfully demonstrate historical continuity and the faithful fulfillment of God's promises, illustrating how God miraculously preserved a distinct people through whom His grand redemptive plan would progressively unfold. The unbroken lineage from Adam to the returning exiles underscored God's unwavering covenant faithfulness across millennia. Thirdly, they served as essential legal documents for matters of land inheritance, tribal organization, and social structure within ancient Israelite society. Finally, and most significantly from a theological perspective, these genealogies ultimately point to the lineage of the Messiah, meticulously tracing the specific family lines through which the promised Savior would ultimately come, as supremely fulfilled in the genealogies of Jesus found in the New Testament (see Matthew 1:1-17 and Luke 3:23-38).

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

While 1 Chronicles 8:1 presents a seemingly straightforward list of names, its Christ-centered fulfillment is deeply profound, residing in the very purpose and meticulous preservation of these genealogies: to trace the divinely ordained lineage through which God's ultimate covenant promises would be realized. The careful preservation of the tribe of Benjamin's identity, along with all the other tribes of Israel, ensures the continuity and integrity of the people from whom the Messiah would eventually emerge. Although Jesus Christ came primarily through the tribe of Judah, the existence and integrity of all twelve tribes were vital for the full tapestry of God's redemptive plan, representing the whole of Israel to whom the promises were originally made. This verse, therefore, contributes to the grand, overarching narrative of God's unwavering faithfulness in preserving a chosen people, a faithfulness that ultimately culminates in the miraculous birth of Jesus Christ, the true Son of David, the ultimate King, and the Lamb of God, who came not only for the salvation of Israel but for the redemption of all nations (see Romans 15:8-12). The meticulous record-keeping of human lineage in the Old Testament powerfully foreshadows the divine precision with which God orchestrated the incarnation, ensuring that Jesus was indeed the promised "seed" who would crush the serpent's head (compare Genesis 3:15) and perfectly fulfill all the law and the prophets (as affirmed by Jesus Himself in Matthew 5:17).

Copy as

Commentary on 1 Chronicles 8 verses 1–32

There is little or nothing of history in all these verses; we have not therefore much to observe. 1. As to the difficulties that occur in this and the foregoing genealogies we need not perplex ourselves. I presume Ezra took them as he found them in the books of the kings of Israel and Judah (Ezr 9:1), according as they were given in by the several tribes, each observing what method they thought fit. Hence some ascend, others desecnd; some have numbers affixed, others places; some have historical remarks intermixed, others have not; some are shorter, others longer; some agree with other records, others differ; some, it is likely, were torn, erased, and blotted, others more legible. Those of Dan and Reuben were entirely lost. This holy man wrote as he was moved by the Holy Ghost; but there was no necessity for the making up of the defects, no, nor for the rectifying of the mistakes, of these genealogies by inspiration. It was sufficient that he copied them out as they came into his hand, or so much of them as was requisite to the present purpose, which was the directing of the returned captives to settle as nearly as they could with those of their own family, and in the places of their former residence. We may suppose that many things in these genealogies which to us seem intricate, abrupt, and perplexed, were plain and easy to them then (who knew how to fill up the deficiencies) and abundantly answered the intention of the publishing of them. 2. Many great and mighty nations there were now in being upon earth, and many illustrious men in them, whose names are buried in perpetual oblivion, while the names of multitudes of the Israel of God are here carefully preserved in everlasting remembrance. They are Jasher, Jeshurun - just ones, and the memory of the just is blessed. Many of these we have reason to fear, came short of everlasting honour (for even the wicked kings of Judah come into the genealogy), yet the perpetuating of their names here was a figure of the writing of the names of all God's spiritual Israel in the Lamb's book of life. 3. This tribe of Benjamin was once brought to a very low ebb, in the time of the judges, upon the occasion of the iniquity of Gibeah, when only 600 men escaped the sword of justice; and yet, in these genealogies, it makes as good a figure as almost any of the tribes: for it is the honour of God to help the weakest and raise up those that are most diminished and abased. 4. Here is mention of one Ehud (Ch1 8:6), in the preceding verse of one Gera (Ch1 8:5) and (Ch1 8:8) of one that descended from him, that begat children in the country of Moab, which inclines me to think it was that Ehud who was the second of the judges of Israel; for he is said to be the son of Gera and a Benjamite (Jdg 3:15), and he delivered Israel from the oppression of the Moabites by killing the king of Moab, which might give him a greater sway in the country of Moab than we find evidence of in his history and might occasion some of his posterity to settle there. 5. Here is mention of some of the Benjamites that drove away the inhabitants of Gath (Ch1 8:13), perhaps those that had slain the Ephraimites (Ch1 7:21) or their posterity, by way of reprisal: and one of those that did this piece of justice was named Beriah too, that name in which the memorial of that injury was preserved. 6. Particular notice is taken of those that dwelt in Jerusalem (Ch1 8:28 and again Ch1 8:32), that those whose ancestors had had their residence there might thereby be induced, at their return from captivity, to settle there too, which, for aught that appears, few were willing to do, because it was the post of danger: and therefore we find (Neh 11:2) the people blessed those that willingly offered themselves to dwell at Jerusalem, the greater part being inclined to prefer the cities of Judah. Those whose godly parents had their conversation in the new Jerusalem should thereby be engaged to set their faces thitherward and pursue the way thither, whatever it cost them.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 1–32. Public domain.
Copy as
Theodoret of CyrusAD 458
QUESTIONS ON FIRST CHRONICLES, PROLOGUE
The Chronicles also speak about the tabernacle because a temple of the Lord had not yet been built by either Samuel or David. The text also adds that that the holy services were held in the tabernacle. Worship was observed at that time according to the number of the days of the week. For it also says, “and their kindred who were in their villages were obliged to come in every seven days, in turn, to be with them.” With regard to the holy utensils it says, “Some of them had charge of the utensils of service, for they were required to count them when they were brought in and taken out. Others of them were appointed over the furniture, and over all the holy utensils, also over the choice flour, the wine, the oil, the incense and the spices.” And about the priests it says, “Others, of the sons of the priests, prepared the mixing of the spices.” With regard to the tomb of Saul the Chronicles gives us much information, and in the Book of Kings itself we read that his bones were gathered and buried in the land of Jabesh.
Theodoret of CyrusAD 458
QUESTIONS ON 1 CHRONICLES, PROLOGUE
There is abundant information in the books of Chronicles which were written to continue the books of the Kings and to preserve the memory of such important events. The first book begins with a genealogy that sets out to demonstrate how the human race came from a single man. Since it focuses only on the single kingdom of Judah, it can tell us about its cities and the villages, and from where they took their names. Here we come to know Nathan, from whom the blessed Luke constructed the beginning of his genealogy of our Lord and Savior, Son of David and Solomon’s brother4 on his mother’s side: “The following children were born to him in Jerusalem: Shimeah, Shobab, Nathan and Solomon, that is, the four children he fathered with Bersabea, daughter of Ammiel.” And Rechab6 herself, who is mentioned in many books of Scripture, is said to have come from the tribe of Judah.It also clearly explains why Reuben lost his birthright and Joseph gained it and also, finally, the reason why the tribe of Judah obtained the highest honor: “The sons of Reuben the firstborn of Israel. He was the firstborn, but because he defiled his father’s bed his birthright was given to the sons of Joseph son of Israel, so that he is not enrolled in the genealogy according to the birthright; though Judah became prominent among his brothers and a ruler came from him, yet the birthright belonged to Joseph.” It also explains the reason why such a great honor was conceded to Joseph. By the will of God Judah had the dignity of receiving the Lord who was born from him according to the flesh. This is the sense tacitly expressed with the words “a leader from him.” Indeed the passage seems to assert that not only the kings of the earth derived from Judah, but also the eternal king himself who had no beginning and will never end.
It also describes the situation of the tribes beyond the Jordan, those of Reuben and Gad, and even the tribes of Manasseh which later were received into those of the Hagarites and the Itureans, and talks about the tribes of the Naphiseans, and all those peoples who entered into conflict with them. In addition the text relates how they fought and won, and made the Hagarites flee. And it also reports the reason for the victory: “When they received help against them, the Hagarites and all who were with them were given into their hands, for they cried to God in the battle, and he granted their entreaty because they trusted in him.” It also describes the amount of the spoils of war: “They captured their livestock: 50, of their camels, 250, sheep, 2, donkeys and 100, captives. Many were slain because the war was from God. And they lived in their territory until the exile.”
Theodoret of CyrusAD 458
QUESTIONS ON 1 CHRONICLES, PROLOGUE
The genealogy of the priests and the Levites comes after this. It relates that Zadok, who was high priest at the time of David, had been the eleventh from Aaron; that Azariah, nephew of Zadok, had been the first to receive the priestly anointing in the temple built by Solomon. Among them there was also Jehozadak, who was brought to Babylon as a war prisoner. Jesus9 was his son, a high priest as well, who delivered the people from bondage together with Zerubbabel, and built a temple for the Lord. Here we also learn that Korah, who revolted against the great Moses, was a nephew of Isaar, son of Caath and brother of Amram, Aaron’s and Moses’ father. According to this lineage he was related to the first legislator. But he himself paid in the desert for his errors, although his children did not share the punishment of their father. From here Samuel13 came and then Aeman, who intoned Psalms and was a nephew of the prophet Samuel. In fact he was the son of Joel, son of Samuel. On the other hand, Asaph, one of the singers, came from the lineage of Gerson, son of Levi and brother of Caath. Aetham, who also belonged to the group of the singers, had Merari, the third son of Levi, as great-grandfather.The text also explains the difference between the priests and the Levites. It relates that the Levites were initiated into all the ministries of the holy altar of God: “But Aaron and his sons made offerings on the altar of burnt offering and on the altar of incense, doing all the work of the most holy place, to make atonement for Israel, according to all that Moses the servant of God had commanded.” It seems to me, in fact, that this book was written after the return from Babylon. For this reason it also talks about the bondage and explains its cause: “So all Israel was enrolled by genealogies; and these are written in the book of the Kings of Israel. And Judah was taken into exile in Babylon because of their unfaithfulness. Now the first to live again in their possessions in their towns were Israelites, priests, Levites, and temple servants.” These accounts show that the book was begun after the captivity. Indeed no historian ever relates facts that happened afterwards, but what happened before or during his times. And actually only the prophets have the power to foretell the future. In addition it says that also those who had inhabited that land before them had been enslaved. And actually many of them still live with them: the Canaanites, Chettites, Jebusites, who had been their companions in such a misfortune. Also the priests and the Levites were brought into captivity with the Israelites. I believe that those who were called “the saints’ servants” were then called Nathinim. Many of them, in fact, consecrated themselves to the ministries of the priests and the Levites. There were among them also those who were entrusted with the carrying of the water, the gathering of wood and other necessary duties. Indeed, if it was imposed to the Gabaonites, who were foreigners, to follow Joshua in the praises and to perform some works as porters or carpenters, this task was even more the duty of the Israelites. As a proof of this I have found in the interpretation of Hebrew names that this name means “house of Iaō,” that is, “of the God who is.” The text, in fact, mentions the children of Israel and among them Judah and Benjamin, and Ephraim18 and Manasseh. It also mentions the priests and the Levites, who inhabited those cities. About the Korēnites it says that they derived from Korah. It also says that among them there had been the guardians of the temple of God as well, and it seems that this custom had been introduced by Samuel and David. “All these, who were chosen as gatekeepers at the thresholds, were two hundred twelve. They were enrolled by genealogies in their villages. David and the prophet Samuel established them in their office of trust. So they and their descendants were in charge of the gates of the house of the Lord, that is, the house of the tent, as guards. The gatekeepers were on the four sides, east, west, north, and south.”
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying 1 Chronicles 8:1 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.