TRV
See on the biblical-era map
Study This Verse
Public-domain commentary
Matthew Henry
From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry comments on passages, not single verses — this entry covers 1 Chronicles 6:1–30.
The priests and Levites were more concerned than any other Israelites to preserve their pedigree clear and to be able to prove it, because all the honours and privileges of their office depended upon their descent. And we read of those who, though perhaps they really were children of the priests, yet, because they could not find the register of their genealogies, nor make out their descent by any authentic record, were, as polluted, put from the priesthood, and forbidden to eat of the holy things, Ezr 2:62, Ezr 2:63. It is but very little that is here recorded of the genealogies of this sacred tribe. I. The first fathers of it are here named twice, Ch1 6:1, Ch1 6:16. Gershom, Kohath, and Merari, are three names which we were very conversant with in the book of Numbers, when the families of the Levites were marshalled and had their work assigned to them. Aaron, and Moses, and Miriam, we have known much more of than their names, and cannot pass them over here without remembering that this was that Moses and Aaron whom God honoured in making them instruments of Israel's deliverance and settlement and figures of him that was to come, Moses as a prophet and Aaron as a priest. And the mention of Nadab and Abihu (though, having no children, there was no occasion to bring them into the genealogy) cannot but remind us of the terrors of that divine justice which they were made monuments of for offering strange fire, that we may always fear before him. 2. The line of Eleazar, the successor of Aaron, is here drawn down to the time of the captivity, Ch1 6:4-15. It begins with Eleazar, who came out of the house of bondage in Egypt, and ends with Jehozadak, who went into the house of bondage in Babylon. Thus, for their sins, they were left as they were found, which might also intimate that the Levitical priesthood did not make anything perfect, but this was to be done by the bringing in of a better hope. All these here named were not high priests; for, in the time of the judges, that dignity was, upon some occasion or other, brought into the family of Ithamar, of which Eli was; but in Zadok it returned again to the right line. Of Azariah it is here said (v. 10), He it is that executed the priest's office in the temple that Solomon built. It is supposed that this was that Azariah who bravely opposed the presumption of king Uzziah when he invaded the priest's office (Ch2 26:17, Ch2 26:18), though he ventured his neck by so doing. This was done like a priest, like one that was truly zealous for his God. He that thus boldly maintained and defended the priest's office, and made good its barriers against such a daring insult, might well be said to execute it; and this honour is put upon him for it; while Urijah, one of his successors, for a base compliance with King Ahaz, in building him an idolatrous altar, has the disgrace put upon him of being left out of this genealogy, as perhaps some others are. But some think that this remark upon this Azariah should have been added to his grandfather of the same name (Ch1 6:9), who was the son of Ahimaaz, and that he was the priest who first officiated in Solomon's temple. 3. Some other of the families of the Levites are here accounted for. One of the families of Gershom (that of Libni) is here drawn down as far as Samuel, who had the honour of a prophet added to that of a Levite. One of the families of Merari (that of Mahli) is likewise drawn down for several descents, Ch1 6:29, Ch1 6:30.
Historical interpretation
Historical Reception
3 surviving comments on this verse. Each one is dated, so this reads as a timeline rather than a list.
The Chronicles also speak about the tabernacle because a temple of the Lord had not yet been built by either Samuel or David. The text also adds that that the holy services were held in the tabernacle. Worship was observed at that time according to the number of the days of the week. For it also says, “and their kindred who were in their villages were obliged to come in every seven days, in turn, to be with them.” With regard to the holy utensils it says, “Some of them had charge of the utensils of service, for they were required to count them when they were brought in and taken out. Others of them were appointed over the furniture, and over all the holy utensils, also over the choice flour, the wine, the oil, the incense and the spices.” And about the priests it says, “Others, of the sons of the priests, prepared the mixing of the spices.” With regard to the tomb of Saul the Chronicles gives us much information, and in the Book of Kings itself we read that his bones were gathered and buried in the land of Jabesh.
There is abundant information in the books of Chronicles which were written to continue the books of the Kings and to preserve the memory of such important events. The first book begins with a genealogy that sets out to demonstrate how the human race came from a single man. Since it focuses only on the single kingdom of Judah, it can tell us about its cities and the villages, and from where they took their names. Here we come to know Nathan, from whom the blessed Luke constructed the beginning of his genealogy of our Lord and Savior, Son of David and Solomon’s brother4 on his mother’s side: “The following children were born to him in Jerusalem: Shimeah, Shobab, Nathan and Solomon, that is, the four children he fathered with Bersabea, daughter of Ammiel.” And Rechab6 herself, who is mentioned in many books of Scripture, is said to have come from the tribe of Judah.It also clearly explains why Reuben lost his birthright and Joseph gained it and also, finally, the reason why the tribe of Judah obtained the highest honor: “The sons of Reuben the firstborn of Israel. He was the firstborn, but because he defiled his father’s bed his birthright was given to the sons of Joseph son of Israel, so that he is not enrolled in the genealogy according to the birthright; though Judah became prominent among his brothers and a ruler came from him, yet the birthright belonged to Joseph.” It also explains the reason why such a great honor was conceded to Joseph. By the will of God Judah had the dignity of receiving the Lord who was born from him according to the flesh. This is the sense tacitly expressed with the words “a leader from him.” Indeed the passage seems to assert that not only the kings of the earth derived from Judah, but also the eternal king himself who had no beginning and will never end.
It also describes the situation of the tribes beyond the Jordan, those of Reuben and Gad, and even the tribes of Manasseh which later were received into those of the Hagarites and the Itureans, and talks about the tribes of the Naphiseans, and all those peoples who entered into conflict with them. In addition the text relates how they fought and won, and made the Hagarites flee. And it also reports the reason for the victory: “When they received help against them, the Hagarites and all who were with them were given into their hands, for they cried to God in the battle, and he granted their entreaty because they trusted in him.” It also describes the amount of the spoils of war: “They captured their livestock: 50, of their camels, 250, sheep, 2, donkeys and 100, captives. Many were slain because the war was from God. And they lived in their territory until the exile.”
The genealogy of the priests and the Levites comes after this. It relates that Zadok, who was high priest at the time of David, had been the eleventh from Aaron; that Azariah, nephew of Zadok, had been the first to receive the priestly anointing in the temple built by Solomon. Among them there was also Jehozadak, who was brought to Babylon as a war prisoner. Jesus9 was his son, a high priest as well, who delivered the people from bondage together with Zerubbabel, and built a temple for the Lord. Here we also learn that Korah, who revolted against the great Moses, was a nephew of Isaar, son of Caath and brother of Amram, Aaron’s and Moses’ father. According to this lineage he was related to the first legislator. But he himself paid in the desert for his errors, although his children did not share the punishment of their father. From here Samuel13 came and then Aeman, who intoned Psalms and was a nephew of the prophet Samuel. In fact he was the son of Joel, son of Samuel. On the other hand, Asaph, one of the singers, came from the lineage of Gerson, son of Levi and brother of Caath. Aetham, who also belonged to the group of the singers, had Merari, the third son of Levi, as great-grandfather.The text also explains the difference between the priests and the Levites. It relates that the Levites were initiated into all the ministries of the holy altar of God: “But Aaron and his sons made offerings on the altar of burnt offering and on the altar of incense, doing all the work of the most holy place, to make atonement for Israel, according to all that Moses the servant of God had commanded.” It seems to me, in fact, that this book was written after the return from Babylon. For this reason it also talks about the bondage and explains its cause: “So all Israel was enrolled by genealogies; and these are written in the book of the Kings of Israel. And Judah was taken into exile in Babylon because of their unfaithfulness. Now the first to live again in their possessions in their towns were Israelites, priests, Levites, and temple servants.” These accounts show that the book was begun after the captivity. Indeed no historian ever relates facts that happened afterwards, but what happened before or during his times. And actually only the prophets have the power to foretell the future. In addition it says that also those who had inhabited that land before them had been enslaved. And actually many of them still live with them: the Canaanites, Chettites, Jebusites, who had been their companions in such a misfortune. Also the priests and the Levites were brought into captivity with the Israelites. I believe that those who were called “the saints’ servants” were then called Nathinim. Many of them, in fact, consecrated themselves to the ministries of the priests and the Levites. There were among them also those who were entrusted with the carrying of the water, the gathering of wood and other necessary duties. Indeed, if it was imposed to the Gabaonites, who were foreigners, to follow Joshua in the praises and to perform some works as porters or carpenters, this task was even more the duty of the Israelites. As a proof of this I have found in the interpretation of Hebrew names that this name means “house of Iaō,” that is, “of the God who is.” The text, in fact, mentions the children of Israel and among them Judah and Benjamin, and Ephraim18 and Manasseh. It also mentions the priests and the Levites, who inhabited those cities. About the Korēnites it says that they derived from Korah. It also says that among them there had been the guardians of the temple of God as well, and it seems that this custom had been introduced by Samuel and David. “All these, who were chosen as gatekeepers at the thresholds, were two hundred twelve. They were enrolled by genealogies in their villages. David and the prophet Samuel established them in their office of trust. So they and their descendants were in charge of the gates of the house of the Lord, that is, the house of the tent, as guards. The gatekeepers were on the four sides, east, west, north, and south.”
Continue studying 1 Chronicles 6:22 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
SefariaThe Hebrew text with Rashi and centuries of Jewish commentary.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
Summary
1 Chronicles 6:22 meticulously details a segment of the Levitical lineage, specifically tracing the descendants of Kohath, one of Levi's three sons. This verse, part of the extensive genealogies that open the book of 1 Chronicles, serves to establish the legitimate lines for sacred service within the post-exilic Israelite community. Its inclusion of "Korah his son" is particularly profound, highlighting God's sovereign grace and faithfulness in preserving a legitimate branch of a family otherwise infamous for rebellion, demonstrating the continuity of divine purpose even through challenging historical narratives.
Context
Literary Context
The book of 1 Chronicles commences with nine chapters dedicated to extensive genealogies, a foundational record for the post-exilic Israelite community returning from Babylonian exile. These lists were not mere historical curiosities but vital documents for re-establishing tribal identity, land claims, and, crucially, the legitimate lines for the priesthood and monarchy. Chapter 6 focuses specifically on the tribe of Levi, whose descendants, the Levites, were central to the worship life of Israel, performing various duties in the tabernacle and later the temple. This verse, "The sons of Kohath; Amminadab his son, Korah his son, Assir his son," highlights a specific branch of Kohath, one of Levi's three sons (alongside Gershon and Merari). The Kohathites were uniquely responsible for carrying the most sacred articles of the tabernacle, underscoring their vital role in Israel's cultic life. The meticulous detail here reinforces the Chronicler's emphasis on the continuity of God's covenant with His people and the established order of worship.
Historical & Cultural Context
Composed likely in the post-exilic period (around 400-300 BCE), 1 Chronicles addresses a community seeking to re-establish its identity and religious practices after generations of displacement. In ancient Israelite society, genealogies were paramount. They served as legal documents, defining one's place in the community, validating claims to land and inheritance, and, most importantly, establishing eligibility for positions of religious and political authority. The Levites, as the designated tribe for temple service, held a unique and critical role. Their lineage ensured the purity and legitimacy of the sacrificial system and the proper administration of divine worship. The survival and inclusion of specific family lines, even those with controversial pasts like Korah's, spoke volumes about God's faithfulness to His promises and the enduring nature of His chosen structures for worship, providing hope and stability to a people rebuilding their national and spiritual life.
Key Themes
This seemingly simple genealogical entry contributes significantly to several overarching themes in 1 Chronicles. Firstly, Genealogical Preservation underscores the ancient Israelite emphasis on meticulous record-keeping for lineage, vital for affirming identity, inheritance, and roles within the community, especially concerning religious service. Secondly, Continuity of Divine Purpose is powerfully demonstrated; despite historical upheavals and the exile, these lists show God's faithfulness in maintaining the structure and personnel for His worship, assuring the reader of His enduring plan for His people and the Levites. Finally, Grace Amidst History is profoundly evident in the inclusion of "Korah his son." While a figure named Korah is infamous for leading a major rebellion against Moses and Aaron during the wilderness wanderings, Numbers 26:11 explicitly states that the "children of Korah died not". This verse in 1 Chronicles 6:22 confirms the survival of a legitimate branch of Korah's descendants, who continued in the Levitical lineage, often serving as temple musicians or doorkeepers, as seen in 1 Chronicles 9:19. This highlights God's mercy, His ability to work through imperfect human lines, and the preservation of a remnant even from a line associated with profound rebellion.
Exposition and Analysis
Key Word Analysis
Derived from an unused root meaning "to ally oneself," suggesting "allied." Kohath was one of Levi's three sons, and his descendants, the Kohathites, were divinely "allied" or entrusted with the most sacred duties concerning the tabernacle and its furnishings, including the Ark of the Covenant. Their unique proximity to the holy objects of God's presence underscored their vital role in Israel's worship.
Meaning "ice." This name carries immense historical weight due to the rebellion led by a Korah against Moses and Aaron (Numbers 16). The inclusion of "Korah his son" in this legitimate Levitical genealogy is a striking testament to God's selective judgment and enduring grace. While the rebellious Korah and his immediate followers perished, a branch of his family was spared and continued to serve, demonstrating that divine judgment is precise and that God's purposes can transcend human failings.
Meaning "prisoner." The name "Assir" might carry a subtle layer of meaning, potentially alluding to the family's past association with rebellion and the subsequent divine judgment, or perhaps to their dedicated service, being "bound" to the service of the Lord. While the primary significance of the name here is its role in tracing the lineage, the etymology adds a unique dimension to this particular branch of the Kohathites.
Verse Breakdown
"The sons of Kohath;"
This opening phrase immediately situates the subsequent names within the larger Levitical framework, specifically identifying the lineage as belonging to Kohath, one of Levi's three primary descendants. It establishes the foundational tribal and familial context, emphasizing the importance of the Kohathite clan in Israel's religious structure.
"Amminadab his son,"
This identifies Amminadab as the direct descendant of Kohath in this particular line. The phrase "his son" is a standard genealogical marker, indicating direct paternal descent and maintaining the sequential flow of the lineage. Amminadab serves as the link in the chain leading to the more historically significant figure of Korah.
"Korah his son,"
This is the most notable part of the verse. It identifies Korah as the son of Amminadab and a direct descendant of Kohath. The inclusion of Korah here is crucial because it confirms the survival and continuation of a legitimate branch of his family, distinct from the rebellious Korah whose line was cut off in the wilderness. This demonstrates the Chronicler's careful preservation of historical detail and theological nuance.
"Assir his son,"
This concludes the immediate sequence presented in this verse, naming Assir as the son of Korah. Assir represents the continuation of this specific branch of the Kohathite lineage, further extending the genealogical record and reinforcing the unbroken chain of descent within the Levitical tribe.
Literary Devices
The primary literary device at play in 1 Chronicles 6:22, and indeed throughout the initial chapters of 1 Chronicles, is Genealogy. This is not merely a list of names but a structured literary form designed to establish historical continuity, confirm identity, and validate claims of legitimacy, particularly for religious and royal offices. The repetitive use of "his son" serves as a form of Anaphora and Repetition, emphasizing the unbroken chain of descent and the meticulous nature of the record-keeping. Furthermore, the very presence of Korah's name, given its infamous biblical background, introduces a subtle Irony or Paradox, highlighting God's grace and selective judgment. The Chronicler, by including this detail, subtly communicates a theological message about redemption and the enduring nature of God's covenant purposes, even amidst human rebellion.
Theological and Thematic Connections
1 Chronicles 6:22, though a simple genealogical entry, powerfully underscores God's meticulous care for His covenant people and His unwavering faithfulness to His promises. The preservation of specific lineages, especially the Levitical line, speaks to the divine commitment to maintain the structures necessary for worship and the perpetuation of His relationship with Israel. The inclusion of Korah's descendants, despite the infamous rebellion, serves as a profound testament to God's sovereign grace and mercy, demonstrating that divine judgment is precise and that a remnant can be preserved for His purposes. This verse implicitly teaches that God's plan is not thwarted by human sin, and His capacity for redemption extends even to those from a lineage marked by significant failings. It reminds us that our past does not necessarily dictate our future in God's economy.
Reflection and Application
While a seemingly dry list of names, 1 Chronicles 6:22 offers profound insights into God's character and His dealings with humanity. It reminds us that God is a God of meticulous detail, who cares about every individual and every thread in the tapestry of history. Just as He preserved the lineage for His sacred service, He is intimately involved in the details of our lives, orchestrating circumstances and maintaining His purposes across generations. The survival of Korah's legitimate line, despite the infamous rebellion, serves as a powerful testament to God's grace and His ability to bring forth good even from challenging histories. It encourages us to embrace our own spiritual heritage, recognizing that we are part of a larger story of God's faithfulness, and that even when our past or our family's past may be marked by sin or struggle, God can still use and bless us for His glory. This verse calls us to trust in God's redemptive power and to recognize that His grace can transform any legacy.
Questions for Reflection
FAQ
Why are genealogies so important in the Bible, especially in books like 1 Chronicles?
Genealogies in the Bible are far more than mere lists; they are foundational to the biblical narrative and theological understanding. In 1 Chronicles, written for a post-exilic community, genealogies served several crucial purposes. They re-established tribal identity and land claims for a people returning to their homeland. More importantly, they validated the legitimacy of the priesthood and the monarchy, ensuring that those serving in sacred roles or ruling the nation were from the divinely appointed lines. They also demonstrated God's faithfulness to His covenant promises, showing the unbroken continuity of His plan through generations, even amidst periods of exile and disruption. For the Chronicler, these lists underscored the enduring nature of God's relationship with Israel and the importance of proper worship.
How could Korah's descendants survive and serve after his infamous rebellion against Moses and Aaron?
The account of Korah's rebellion in Numbers 16 describes a severe divine judgment where the earth swallowed Korah, Dathan, and Abiram, along with their households. However, Numbers 26:11 explicitly states, "But the children of Korah died not." This indicates that not all of Korah's lineage perished; a specific branch was spared. This act of divine selectivity highlights God's justice in punishing the rebellious leaders while also demonstrating His mercy in preserving a remnant. This preserved line of Korah's descendants went on to serve faithfully within the Levitical order, notably as temple doorkeepers and, most famously, as composers of several psalms (e.g., Psalm 42, Psalm 84). Their continued service is a powerful testament to God's redemptive grace, showing that His purposes can transcend human failure and that He can use those from a challenging past for His glory.
Christ-Centered Fulfillment
While 1 Chronicles 6:22 focuses on the Levitical lineage, its themes find profound Christ-centered fulfillment. The meticulous preservation of the Kohathite line, including the surprising survival of Korah's descendants, foreshadows God's ultimate faithfulness in bringing forth the promised Messiah through a specific, divinely ordained lineage. Just as the genealogies of 1 Chronicles establish legitimacy for the Levitical priesthood, the genealogies of Jesus in Matthew 1:1-17 and Luke 3:23-38 confirm His rightful claim as the Son of David and the Son of God, the ultimate King and High Priest. The Levitical priesthood, though divinely instituted, was imperfect and temporary, requiring a continuous succession. Christ, however, is the perfect and eternal High Priest, not according to the Levitical order, but "according to the order of Melchizedek" (Hebrews 7:11-17). His sacrifice was once for all (Hebrews 9:11-14), superseding the need for the Levitical system. Furthermore, the grace shown in preserving Korah's line, despite rebellion, is a powerful type of the boundless grace found in Christ, who extends forgiveness and new life to all who believe, regardless of their past. Through Him, believers are adopted into God's family, becoming "children of God" (John 1:12) and part of a spiritual lineage that transcends earthly tribal distinctions, fulfilling God's ultimate redemptive purpose in a way far grander than any earthly genealogy.