Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
¶ Now Korah, the son of Izhar, the son of Kohath, the son of Levi, and Dathan and Abiram, the sons of Eliab, and On, the son of Peleth, sons of Reuben, took men:
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
Now Korah H7141, the son H1121 of Izhar H3324, the son H1121 of Kohath H6955, the son H1121 of Levi H3878, and Dathan H1885 and Abiram H48, the sons H1121 of Eliab H446, and On H203, the son H1121 of Peleth H6431, sons H1121 of Reuben H7205, took H3947 men:
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
Now Korach the son of Yitz'har, the son of K'hat, the son of Levi, along with Datan and Aviram, the sons of Eli'av, and On, the son of Pelet, descendants of Re'uven, took men and
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
Now Korah son of Izhar, the son of Kohath son of Levi, along with some Reubenites—Dathan and Abiram, sons of Eliab, and On son of Peleth—conducted
Ask
American Standard Version
Now Korah, the son of Izhar, the son of Kohath, the son of Levi, with Dathan and Abiram, the sons of Eliab, and On, the son of Peleth, sons of Reuben, tookmen:
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
Now Korah, the son of Izhar, the son of Kohath, the son of Levi, with Dathan and Abiram, the sons of Eliab, and On, the son of Peleth, sons of Reuben, took some men.
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
Nowe Korah the sonne of Izhar, the sonne of Kohath, the sonne of Leui went apart with Dathan, and Abiram the sonnes of Eliab, and On the sonne of Peleth, the sonnes of Reuben:
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
And Korah, son of Izhar, son of Kohath, son of Levi, taketh both Dathan and Abiram sons of Eliab, and On son of Peleth, sons of Reuben,
Ask
See on the biblical-era map
In the KJVVerse 4,196 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

Numbers 16:1 initiates the dramatic account of one of the most significant challenges to God's divinely established authority during Israel's wilderness journey. This verse introduces Korah, a prominent Levite, along with Dathan, Abiram, and On from the tribe of Reuben, as the instigators of a formidable rebellion against the leadership of Moses and Aaron. It sets the stage for a profound confrontation that would test divine patience, underscore the sanctity of God's chosen order, and reveal the severe consequences of defying His appointed servants and sacred institutions.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: Numbers 16:1 immediately follows a detailed exposition of various laws and ordinances, including those concerning offerings, unintentional sins, and the meticulous duties assigned to the Levites and priests. This preceding context of divine order and precise instruction amplifies the gravity of the rebellion that is about to unfold, presenting it as a direct affront to the very structures God has meticulously established or reiterated. More broadly, this event is situated within the larger narrative of Israel's wilderness wanderings, a period consistently marked by murmuring, unbelief, and direct rebellion against God and His chosen leaders. Notably, it follows the catastrophic events at Kadesh-Barnea, where the generation was condemned to perish in the wilderness due to their faithlessness. The narrative of Korah's rebellion serves as a climactic illustration of the persistent human tendency toward defiance and the dire consequences of challenging divine authority within the covenant community.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: The setting is the wilderness encampment of the Israelites, a nomadic society meticulously organized around tribal affiliations with the Tabernacle serving as its spiritual and physical epicenter. Moses functioned as the supreme leader and mediator, divinely appointed by God, while Aaron and his sons held the exclusive rights to the priesthood. Levites, such as Korah, were designated for specific, vital services related to the Tabernacle, including the sacred duty of carrying its furnishings (Numbers 4:15), but they were strictly forbidden from performing priestly functions. In ancient Near Eastern cultures, challenging established leadership, particularly authority perceived as divinely sanctioned, was an exceptionally grave offense, often met with severe repercussions. The motivations of the rebels likely stemmed from a complex interplay of personal ambition (Korah, a Levite, aspiring to the priesthood), tribal resentment (Dathan and Abiram, from Reuben, the firstborn tribe, perhaps feeling their tribal prominence was overlooked), and general discontent with the arduous wilderness journey and Moses' prolonged leadership.
  • Key Themes: This foundational verse introduces several critical themes that resonate throughout the book of Numbers and the wider Pentateuch. Foremost among these is the challenge to divine authority, as the rebellion against Moses and Aaron is explicitly presented not merely as a human dispute but as a rebellion against God Himself (as stated in Numbers 16:11). Another central theme is the usurpation of sacred roles, particularly the priesthood, which God had meticulously and exclusively ordained for Aaron's lineage (Exodus 28). The narrative also powerfully highlights the dangers of discontent, envy, and pride within a community, demonstrating how these destructive forces can rapidly lead to widespread sedition and severe divine judgment. The subsequent unfolding of the rebellion underscores the holiness of God and the absolute necessity of respecting His established order and His chosen leadership, a profound lesson repeatedly taught through various episodes of divine judgment throughout Israel's wilderness journey (e.g., Numbers 20:12).

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • Korah (Hebrew, Qôrach', H7141): Derived from a root meaning "ice" or "baldness," this name here signifies the individual who stands as the primary instigator of the rebellion. As a Levite, a descendant of Kohath, Korah was a cousin to Moses and Aaron, placing him in close proximity to the priestly family. This lineage underscores his privileged position within the Levitical structure, yet it also highlights the profound nature of his ambition. Despite his significant duties as a Kohathite, which involved carrying the sacred Tabernacle furnishings (Numbers 4:15), Korah sought to usurp the priesthood, a role strictly reserved by divine decree for Aaron and his sons.
  • Took (Hebrew, lâqach', H3947): The Qal imperfect consecutive of the primitive root לָקַח (lâqach), meaning "to take," "to seize," or "to receive." In the KJV, "took [men]" is an interpretive addition for clarity. However, the Hebrew וַיִּקַּח (vayyiqqaḥ) carries a crucial nuance in this context. It implies a decisive, self-willed act of "taking a stand," "taking for himself," "separating himself," or "initiating an independent action." This is not a neutral gathering but a defiant and active instigation of sedition, where Korah sets himself apart from the established order and actively gathers others to his cause, signifying a deliberate and rebellious seizure of initiative.

Verse Breakdown

  • "¶ Now Korah, the son of Izhar, the son of Kohath, the son of Levi": This meticulous genealogical tracing establishes Korah's identity as a Levite, specifically from the Kohathite clan. This precision is vital because it highlights his close familial ties to Moses and Aaron (both also Kohathites), underscoring that this rebellion was an internal challenge originating from within the privileged ranks of the Levites, rather than an external threat. It immediately sets up the profound theological tension, as Korah, despite his sacred Levitical duties, sought to transgress the divinely ordained boundaries of the priesthood.
  • "and Dathan and Abiram, the sons of Eliab, and On, the son of Peleth, sons of Reuben": This segment introduces the other principal leaders of the rebellion, identifying them as members of the tribe of Reuben. As Jacob's firstborn son, the tribe of Reuben historically held a position of prominence. Their inclusion suggests a tribal grievance, possibly resentment that leadership was held by a Levite (Moses) rather than a Reubenite, or a general desire for greater political power within the Israelite hierarchy. The mention of "On" is peculiar as he disappears from the narrative after this verse, suggesting he may have withdrawn or played a less significant role in the unfolding events.
  • "took [men]:" As further elaborated in the Key Word Analysis, the Hebrew וַיִּקַּח (vayyiqqaḥ) here signifies Korah's proactive and defiant act of initiating the rebellion. It implies he "took a stand" or "took for himself" a position of opposition, actively gathering supporters or setting himself apart in direct defiance of Moses' authority and, by extension, God's established order. The KJV's "[men]" clarifies that his action involved gathering followers, but the underlying Hebrew emphasizes his personal initiative and rebellious stance, marking the beginning of a significant challenge to divine authority.

Literary Devices

Numbers 16:1 primarily employs Genealogy and Enumeration to precisely identify the key figures initiating the rebellion. The meticulous listing of their tribal and familial connections (Korah's Levite descent, Dathan, Abiram, and On's Reubenite heritage) serves to underscore the internal nature and gravity of this challenge; it is a deliberate act of defiance from within the established structures of Israel. The simple, declarative statement "took [men]" (or, more accurately, "took a stand" or "separated himself") functions as a powerful Inciting Incident, immediately propelling the narrative into the impending conflict and foreshadowing the dramatic divine judgment that will follow. The verse also implicitly uses Contrast by juxtaposing the orderly divine appointments and meticulous instructions (as detailed in preceding chapters) with the chaotic, unauthorized, and rebellious actions of the instigators.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

Numbers 16:1 serves as a foundational text for understanding the sanctity of divinely appointed authority and the severe consequences of challenging God's established order. The rebellion initiated by Korah and his associates was not merely a political maneuver or a personal grievance, but a direct affront to God's sovereignty, as He was the one who had chosen Moses as leader and Aaron as high priest. This episode underscores the profound principle that rebellion against God's chosen servants is tantamount to rebellion against God Himself, highlighting the critical importance of humility, submission, and respect for spiritual leadership within the community of faith. It also teaches a sobering lesson about the insidious dangers of envy, ambition, and discontent, which can lead individuals to defy divine will and ultimately bring about their own destruction.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

The narrative of Korah's rebellion, commencing with this pivotal verse, offers profound and timeless lessons for believers today concerning authority, humility, and the insidious dangers of spiritual pride and discontent. In any community, particularly the church, God establishes structures of leadership and order for the common good and for His glory. To challenge these structures without divine warrant, or to covet roles not explicitly appointed by God, is to tread on extremely dangerous spiritual ground. This passage calls us to a deep and honest self-examination, to discern any latent seeds of discontent, envy, or unchecked ambition within our hearts that might lead us to undermine legitimate authority or to seek positions for self-exaltation rather than humble, God-honoring service. True spiritual maturity involves recognizing and respecting the unique gifts and callings of others, submitting to God's ordained leadership, and finding contentment and purpose in the specific role God has entrusted to us, no matter how seemingly small or significant. It powerfully reminds us that God is a God of order, and His blessings flow through obedience and humble submission to His sovereign will and His established ways.

Questions for Reflection

  • How do I typically respond to authority figures in my life, especially those in spiritual leadership within the church or community?
  • Am I genuinely content with the role God has given me in His kingdom, or do I harbor envy or ambition for positions not meant for me?
  • What are the subtle dangers of discontent, murmuring, and criticism within a community, and how can I actively guard against them in my own heart and actions?
  • In what ways might my personal desires, perceived entitlements, or unexamined pride unknowingly lead me to challenge God's divine order or His chosen instruments?

FAQ

Who were Korah, Dathan, Abiram, and On, and what was their significance?

Answer: Korah was a Levite, specifically a Kohathite, making him a cousin to Moses and Aaron. His significance lies in his high status within the Levitical tribe, which performed sacred duties related to the Tabernacle, though they were explicitly forbidden from priestly functions. His ambition was to usurp the priesthood, a role reserved for Aaron's lineage. Dathan, Abiram, and On were from the tribe of Reuben, the firstborn son of Jacob. Their significance stems from their tribal affiliation; as Reubenites, they might have felt entitled to a more prominent leadership role than Moses, a Levite, held, or resented the loss of their firstborn privileges. Together, they represented a formidable coalition of religious and tribal discontent, uniting different grievances against Moses and Aaron's leadership, which they perceived as usurping their rightful place or authority. Their combined challenge was a direct assault on the divinely established order in Israel.

What does the phrase "took [men]" mean in the original Hebrew?

Answer: The King James Version's "took [men]" adds the word "men" for clarity, but the Hebrew word וַיִּקַּח (vayyiqqaḥ) literally means "and he took" or "he took for himself." In this context, it carries a more nuanced and active meaning than simply gathering people. It implies that Korah "took a stand," "separated himself," or "initiated a decisive action" in opposition to Moses and Aaron. It signifies his personal initiative in setting himself apart from the community's established leadership and actively gathering others to his rebellious cause. This interpretation highlights the deliberate and defiant nature of his act, not merely a passive gathering but an active instigation of sedition. The subsequent narrative confirms that he indeed gathered a significant number of followers (Numbers 16:2).

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

The rebellion of Korah, initiated in Numbers 16:1, serves as a stark Old Testament type and shadow, illuminating the ultimate challenge to divine authority and the nature of true spiritual leadership, which finds its perfect fulfillment in Jesus Christ. Korah sought to usurp the priesthood, a role divinely appointed to Aaron. In profound contrast, Jesus is our true and eternal High Priest, not by human lineage or ambition, but by divine appointment and an unchangeable priesthood, as declared in Hebrews 7:24 and affirmed in Hebrews 5:6. While Korah challenged Moses' mediatorial role, Jesus is the ultimate and sole Mediator of a new and better covenant, through whom alone we have access to God (1 Timothy 2:5). The severe judgment that fell upon Korah and his company for their rebellion against God's chosen leadership foreshadows the ultimate judgment against all who reject God's supreme authority as revealed in Christ. Conversely, those who humbly submit to Christ, the true King and Priest, find life and salvation, not destruction. His perfect obedience and sacrificial atonement provide the true means of approaching God, unlike the unauthorized access sought by Korah, which led to death. In Christ, the dangers of rebellion are overcome by the grace of submission, and the desire for self-exaltation is transformed into humble service under the one true Head of the Church, who holds all authority (Ephesians 1:22-23).

Copy as

Commentary on Numbers 16 verses 1–11

I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points(1.) (2.) Details

Here is, I. An account of the rebels, who and what they were, not, as formerly, the mixed multitude and the dregs of the people, who are therefore never named, but men of distinction and quality, that made a figure. Korah was the ring-leader: he formed and headed the faction; therefore it is called the gainsaying of Korah, Jde 1:11. He was cousin-german to Moses, they were brothers' children, yet the nearness of the relation could not restrain him from being insolent and rude to Moses. Think it not strange if a man's foes be those of his own house. With him joined Dathan and Abiram, chief men of the tribe of Reuben, the eldest son of Jacob. Probably Korah was disgusted both at the preferment of Aaron to the priesthood and the constituting of Elizaphan to the head of the Kohathites (Num 3:30); and perhaps the Reubenites were angry that the tribe of Judah had the first post of honour in the camp. On is mentioned (Num 16:1) as one of the heads of the faction, but never after in the whole story, either because, as some think, he repented and left them, or because he did not make himself so remarkable as Dathan and Abiram did. The Kohathites encamped on the same side of the tabernacle that the Reubenites did, which perhaps gave Korah an opportunity of drawing them in, whence the Jews say, Woe to the wicked man, and woe to his neighbour, who is in danger of being infected by him. And, these being themselves men of renown, they seduced into the conspiracy two hundred and fifty princes of the assembly (Num 16:2); probably they were first-born, or at least heads of families, who, before the elevation of Aaron, had themselves ministered in holy things. Note, The pride, ambition, and emulation, of great men, have always been the occasion of a great deal of mischief both in churches and states. God by his grace make great men humble, and so give peace in our time, O Lord! Famous men, and men of renown, as these are described to be, were the great sinners of the old world, Gen 6:4. The fame and renown which they had did not content them; they were high, but would be higher, and thus the famous men became infamous.

II. The rebels' remonstrance, Num 16:3. That which they quarrel with is the settlement of the priesthood upon Aaron and his family, which they think an honour too great for Moses to give and Aaron to accept, and so they are both charged with usurpation: You take too much upon you; or, "Let it suffice you to have domineered thus long, and now think of resigning your places to those who have as good a title to them and are as well able to manage them." 1. They proudly boast of the holiness of the congregation, and the presence of God in it. "They are holy, every one of them, and as fit to be employed in offering sacrifice as Aaron is, and as masters of families formerly were, and the Lord is among them, to direct and own them." Small reason they had to boast of the people's purity, or of God's favour, as the people had been so frequently and so lately polluted with sin, and were now under the marks of God's displeasure, which should have made them thankful for priests to mediate between them and God; but, instead of that, they envy them. 2. They unjustly charge Moses and Aaron with taking the honour they had to themselves, whereas it was evident, beyond contradiction, that they were called of God to it, Heb 5:4. So that they would either have no priests at all, nor any government, none to preside either in civil or sacred things, none over the congregation, none above it, or they would not acquiesce in that constitution of the government which God had appointed. See here, (1.) What spirit levellers are of, and those that despise dominions, and resist the powers that God has set over them; they are proud, envious, ambitious, turbulent, wicked, and unreasonable men. (2.) What usage even the best and most useful men may expect, even from those they have been serviceable to. If those be represented as usurpers that have the best titles, and those as tyrants that govern best, let them recollect that Moses and Aaron were thus abused.

III. Moses's conduct when their remonstrance was published against him. How did he take it?

1.He fell on his face (Num 16:4), as before, Num 14:5. Thus he showed how willing he would have been to yield to them, and how gladly he would have resigned his government, if it would have consisted with his duty to God and his fidelity to the trust reposed in him. Thus also he applied to God, by prayer, for direction what to say and to do upon this sad occasion. He would not speak to them till he had thus humbled and composed his own spirit (which could not but begin to be heated), and had received instruction from God. The heart of the wise in such a case studies to answer, and asks counsel at God's mouth.

2.He agrees to refer the case to God, and leave it to him to decide it, as one well assured of the goodness of his title, and yet well content to resign, if God thought fit, to gratify this discontented people with another nomination. An honest cause fears not a speedy trial; even tomorrow let it be brought on, Num 16:5-7. Let Korah and his partisans bring their censers, and offer incense before the Lord, and, if he testify his acceptance of them, well and good; Moses is now as willing that all the Lord's people should be priests, if God so pleased, as before that they should all be prophets, Num 11:29. But if God, upon an appeal to him, determine (as no doubt he would) for Aaron, they would find it highly dangerous to make the experiment: and therefore he puts it off till tomorrow, to try whether, when they had slept upon it, they would desist, and let fall their pretensions.

3.He argues the case fairly with them, to still the mutiny with fair reasoning, if possible, before the appeal came to God's tribunal, for then he knew it would end in the confusion of the complainants.

(1.)He calls them the sons of Levi, Num 16:7, and again Num 16:8. They were of his own tribe, nay, they were of God's tribe; it was therefore the worse in them thus to mutiny both against God and against him. It was not long since the sons of Levi had bravely appeared on God's side, in the matter of the golden calf, and got immortal honour by it; and shall those that were then the only innocents now be the leading criminals, and lose all the honour they had won? Could there be such chaff on God's floor? Levites, and yet rebels?

(2.)He retorts their charge upon themselves. They had unjustly charged Moses and Aaron with taking too much upon them, though they had done no more than what God put upon them; nay, says Moses, You take too much upon you, you sons of Levi. Note, Those that take upon them to control and contradict God's appointment take too much upon them. It is enough for us to submit; it is too much to prescribe.

(3.)He shows them the privilege they had as Levites, which was sufficient for them, they needed not to aspire to the honour of the priesthood, Num 16:9, Num 16:10. He reminds them how great the honour was to which they were preferred, as Levites. [1.] They were separated from the congregation of Israel, distinguished from them, dignified above them; instead of complaining that Aaron's family was advanced above theirs, they ought to have been thankful that their tribe was advanced above the rest of the tribes, though they had been in all respects upon the level with them. Note, It will help to keep us from envying those that are above us duly to consider how many there are below us. Instead of fretting that any are preferred before us in honour, power, estate, or interest, in gifts, graces, or usefulness, we have reason to bless God if we, who are less than the least, are not put among the very last. Many perhaps who deserve better are not preferred so well. [2.] They were separated to very great and valuable honours, First, To draw near to God, nearer than the common Israelites, though they also were a people near unto him; the nearer any are to God the greater is their honour. Secondly, To do the service of the tabernacle. It is honour enough to bear the vessels of the sanctuary, and to be employed in any part of the service of the tabernacle. God's service is not only perfect freedom, but high preferment. Thirdly, To stand before the congregation to minister unto them. Note, Those are truly great that serve the public, and it is the honour of God's ministers to be the church's ministers; nay, which adds to the dignity put upon them, [3.] It was the God of Israel himself that separated them. It was his act and deed to put them into their place, and therefore they ought not to have been discontented: and he it was likewise that put Aaron into his place, and therefore they ought not to have envied him.

(4.)He convicts them of the sin of undervaluing those privileges: Seemeth it a small thing unto you? As if he had said, "It ill becomes you of all men to grudge Aaron the priesthood, when at the same time that he was advanced to that honour you were designed for another honour dependent upon it, and shine with rays borrowed from him." Note, [1.] The privilege of drawing near to the God of Israel is not a small thing in itself, and therefore must not appear small to us. To those who neglect opportunities of drawing near to God, who are careless and formal in it, to whom it is a task and not a pleasure, we may properly put this question: "Seemeth it a small thing to you that God has made you a people near unto him?" [2.] Those who aspire after and usurp the honours forbidden them put a great contempt upon the honours allowed them. We have each of us as good a share of reputation as God sees fit for us, and sees us fit for, and much better than we deserve; and we ought to rest satisfied with it, and not, as these, exercise ourselves in things too high for us: Seek you the priesthood also? They would not own that they sought it, but Moses saw that they had this in their eye; the law had provided very well for those that served at the altar, and therefore they would put in for the office.

(5.)He interprets their mutiny to be a rebellion against God (Num 16:11); while they pretended to assert the holiness and liberty of the Israel of God, they really took up arms against the God of Israel: You are gathered together against the Lord. Note, Those that strive against God's ordinances and providences, whatever they pretend, and whether they are aware of it or no, do indeed strive with their Maker. Those resist the prince who resist those that are commissioned by him: for, alas! says Moses, What is Aaron, that you murmur against him? If murmurers and complainers would consider that the instruments they quarrel with are but instruments whom God employs, and that they are but what he makes them, and neither more nor less, better nor worse, they would not be so bold and free in their censures and reproaches as they are. Those that found the priesthood, as it was settled, a blessing, must give all the praise to God; but if any found it a burden they must not therefore quarrel with Aaron, who is but what he is made, and does but as he is bidden. Thus he interested God in the cause, and so might be sure of speeding well in his appeal.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 1–11. Public domain.
Copy as
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Numbers 16:1 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.