Skip to content

Numbers 16:2

“Korah's Rebellion against Moses and Aaron”· Numbers 16:1–11Read in context
King James Version
And they rose up before Moses, with certain of the children of Israel, two hundred and fifty princes of the assembly, famous in the congregation, men of renown:
KJV (with Strong's)
And they rose up H6965 before H6440 Moses H4872, with certain H582 of the children H1121 of Israel H3478, two hundred H3967 and fifty H2572 princes H5387 of the assembly H5712, famous H7148 in the congregation H4150, men H582 of renown H8034:
Complete Jewish Bible
rebelled against Moshe. Siding with them were 250 men of Isra'el, leaders of the community, key members of the council, men of reputation.
Berean Standard Bible
a rebellion against Moses, along with 250 men of Israel renowned as leaders of the congregation and representatives in the assembly.
American Standard Version
and they rose up before Moses, with certain of the children of Israel, two hundred and fifty princes of the congregation, called to the assembly, men of renown;
World English Bible Messianic
They rose up before Moses, with some of the children of Israel, two hundred fifty princes of the congregation, called to the assembly, men of renown.
Geneva Bible (1599)
And they rose vp against Moses, with certaine of the children of Israel, two hundreth and fiftie captaines of the assemblie, famous in the Congregation, and men of renoume,
Young's Literal Translation
and they rise up before Moses, with men of the sons of Israel, two hundred and fifty, princes of the company, called of the convention, men of name,
Translation
See on the biblical-era map
In the KJVVerse 4,197 of 31,102 · 13.5%

Study this verse

Summary

Numbers 16:2 introduces the formidable scope of the rebellion against Moses and Aaron, detailing the involvement of "two hundred and fifty princes of the assembly, famous in the congregation, men of renown." This verse immediately follows the identification of Korah, Dathan, and Abiram as the primary instigators, emphasizing that the challenge to divinely appointed leadership was not merely from a few disgruntled individuals but was a widespread, organized, and highly influential uprising from within Israel's respected leadership class, signaling a profound crisis of authority and faith that threatened the very fabric of the nascent nation.

Context

Literary Context

This verse immediately builds upon Numbers 16:1, which names Korah, Dathan, and Abiram as the key figures initiating the rebellion. Verse 2 then dramatically broadens the scope, revealing the significant number and high status of their co-conspirators. It sets the stage for one of the most severe and direct challenges to Moses' and Aaron's divinely ordained authority during Israel's wilderness journey, culminating in swift and dramatic divine judgment. This incident stands in stark contrast to earlier murmuring and challenges, such as those faced by Moses at Rephidim or the complaints of the people in Numbers 11, because it involves established leaders directly questioning God's chosen leadership structure and the very foundations of the theocratic order. The inclusion of the 250 princes elevates the conflict from a personal grievance to a full-blown crisis of national leadership.

Historical & Cultural Context

In ancient Israelite society, "princes of the assembly" (נְשִׂיאֵי עֵדָה, nesi'ei edah) referred to tribal chiefs, heads of families, or prominent elders who held significant social, political, and even judicial standing. These were not common folk but individuals who represented their clans or tribes and participated in crucial communal decisions, often summoned to the "appointed meeting" (מוֹעֵד, mo'ed). Their "fame" and "renown" indicated a high degree of public respect and influence, suggesting they were men of considerable experience and wisdom within their respective spheres. The rebellion, therefore, was not a grassroots uprising but a challenge from within the established elite, who likely felt their traditional authority was being overshadowed by Moses' unique prophetic and Aaron's exclusive priestly roles. This context underscores the gravity of the threat, as such prominent figures could sway large segments of the population and destabilize the entire community.

Key Themes

Numbers 16:2 introduces and reinforces several critical themes that permeate the chapter and the broader book of Numbers. Central among these is the theme of rebellion against divine authority, specifically challenging God's chosen leaders, Moses and Aaron, who served as His direct representatives. The verse highlights the dangers of ambition and envy, as these influential men sought to usurp positions not granted to them by God, echoing the desire for power seen in other biblical narratives. It also underscores the misuse of influence, demonstrating how respected individuals can lead others astray and sow discord within the community. Furthermore, the incident powerfully illustrates the destructive nature of internal strife and disunity within the community of God's people, serving as a cautionary tale against questioning God's established order and the severe consequences of such actions, a theme later referenced in the New Testament, for instance, in Jude 1:11.

Exposition and Analysis

Key Word Analysis

Princes nâsîyʼ' H5387

This word properly means "an exalted one," referring to a king, sheik, or chief. In this context, it designates individuals holding positions of significant leadership and representation within the Israelite community, such as tribal heads or prominent elders. Their involvement signifies that the rebellion was a challenge from the very top echelons of Israelite society, not merely from disgruntled commoners, lending it considerable weight and danger.

Assembly ʻêdâh' H5712

This term refers to a "stated assemblage," specifically a "concourse" or "congregation." It denotes the organized body of the Israelite community, often gathered for specific purposes. The phrase "princes of the assembly" therefore highlights their formal and recognized role within the collective body of Israel, underscoring their official capacity and the representative nature of their rebellion against Moses.

Famous qârîyʼ' H7148

Meaning "called" or "select." This word emphasizes that these 250 individuals were not obscure figures but were well-known and highly regarded within the community. They were "called" or "summoned" to important meetings (referring to H4150, môwʻêd, "appointed meeting" or "congregation"), indicating their status as recognized participants in significant communal decisions. Their public profile made their defection particularly impactful and dangerous.

Renown shêm' H8034

Meaning "an appellation" or "name," by implication, "honor, authority, character." This term, used in the phrase "men of renown" (H582, ʼĕnôwsh, "men" or "mortals"), further underscores the high standing, influence, and public recognition of these individuals. Their "name" carried weight, signifying their reputation and the respect they commanded among the people. The cumulative description of their status emphasizes the severity and widespread nature of the opposition.

Verse Breakdown

"And they rose up before Moses"

This phrase denotes an act of open defiance, a direct and public confrontation with Moses' authority. It signifies a deliberate and organized rebellion, not a private grievance, indicating a challenge to his leadership in full view of the community. The act of "rising up" implies a posture of opposition and an attempt to usurp power.

"with certain of the children of Israel"

This clause clarifies that the rebellion was not limited to Korah, Dathan, and Abiram, nor was it a universal uprising of the entire nation. It highlights that a specific, significant group within the broader Israelite community joined the instigators, emphasizing the selective yet substantial nature of the opposition and indicating a factional division.

"two hundred and fifty princes of the assembly"

This precise numerical detail is crucial, emphasizing the sheer scale, organizational aspect, and formidable nature of the rebellion. Two hundred and fifty is a large, round number, suggesting a representative group of influential leaders, possibly from various tribes or families. Their status as "princes" underscores that this was a challenge from within the established leadership, not merely from common people, making it a profound threat to the existing order.

"famous in the congregation, men of renown"

These descriptive phrases further elaborate on the high status, public recognition, and widespread influence of the 250 individuals. They were not obscure figures but well-known, respected, and influential members of the community. Their participation lent considerable weight and perceived legitimacy to Korah's cause in the eyes of many Israelites, making the rebellion particularly dangerous and widespread due to their ability to sway public opinion.

Literary Devices

Numbers 16:2 employs several literary devices to underscore the gravity and formidable nature of the rebellion. Repetition and emphasis are powerfully evident in the successive descriptions of the 250 individuals: "princes of the assembly," "famous in the congregation," and "men of renown." This cumulative description functions as a form of climax, building the picture of their high status, extensive influence, and the serious threat they posed to Moses' leadership. The sheer number, "two hundred and fifty," functions as a form of numerical emphasis, highlighting the magnitude of the opposition and the widespread nature of the disaffection among the leadership. The verse also serves as a potent form of foreshadowing, hinting at the severe divine judgment that will inevitably follow such a direct and high-level challenge to God's appointed authority. The implicit contrast between the divinely ordained, humble leadership of Moses and the ambitious, self-aggrandizing motives of the rebels sets the stage for the profound theological lessons to follow regarding true authority and submission.

Theological and Thematic Connections

Numbers 16:2 serves as a profound theological statement on the nature of authority, rebellion, and divine judgment. The involvement of such prominent figures underscores that sin and rebellion are not confined to the marginalized but can corrupt even those in positions of power and influence. Theologically, this event highlights the absolute nature of God's sovereignty in appointing leadership and the severe consequences of challenging His divine order. It teaches that true authority flows from God, not from human popularity, status, or ambition. The rebellion of Korah and his company is a stark warning against pride, envy, and the desire for power that is not divinely granted, demonstrating how quickly internal strife, especially when fueled by influential individuals, can undermine a community, even one guided by God.

Reflection and Application

The account of Korah's rebellion, particularly the involvement of "princes of the assembly" and "men of renown," offers timeless lessons for believers and communities today. It serves as a powerful reminder that influence, status, and reputation, while often seen as positive attributes, can be dangerously misused when coupled with ambition, envy, or a lack of submission to God-ordained authority. This passage challenges us to examine our own hearts: do we genuinely respect the leadership God has placed over us, whether in the church, our families, or society, or do we harbor a critical spirit, secretly desiring their position or questioning their legitimacy? It calls for humility in leadership and in followership, recognizing that true authority comes from God and is often expressed through humble service and obedience. The unity of the body of Christ is paramount, and this narrative starkly illustrates the devastating consequences of division, especially when fueled by pride and a challenge to established order. We are called to be builders of unity, not sowers of discord, always seeking to honor God's design for leadership and community, remembering that God resists the proud but gives grace to the humble.

Questions for Reflection

  1. How do I respond to authority, especially spiritual authority, in my life? Do I tend to question, submit, or seek to usurp, and what motivates my posture?
  2. In what ways might ambition, envy, or a desire for recognition subtly influence my interactions within my community or church, particularly concerning leadership roles or perceived slights?
  3. What specific role do I play in fostering unity or disunity within the body of Christ, and how can I better support, pray for, and humbly serve alongside my leaders?

FAQ

Why were these "princes" so influential, and why did they join Korah?

These "princes of the assembly" were influential because they held significant positions as tribal chiefs, heads of families, or respected elders within the Israelite community. Their "fame" and "renown" meant they had a public profile and commanded respect, making their involvement a serious threat to Moses' authority. They likely joined Korah for a combination of reasons: a desire for greater power or recognition, feeling that their traditional authority was being diminished by Moses' unique prophetic and Aaron's exclusive priestly roles, or perhaps genuine but misguided belief in Korah's assertion that "all the congregation are holy" and therefore everyone should have equal access to priestly functions (Numbers 16:3). Their status provided a veneer of legitimacy to Korah's rebellion, drawing in many others who might have otherwise hesitated to challenge God's appointed leaders.

What was the significance of the number 250?

The number 250 is significant because it represents a substantial, organized, and formidable group of leaders. It's not just a handful of individuals but a large contingent, possibly symbolizing a representative group of leaders from various tribes or families who joined the rebellion. This large number emphasizes the widespread nature of the disaffection and the gravity of the challenge posed to Moses and Aaron. It underscores that this was a well-supported, high-level conspiracy, not merely a spontaneous outburst from a few disgruntled people. This large group of prominent individuals made the rebellion a significant threat to the stability and order of the entire Israelite camp, necessitating a dramatic divine intervention to re-establish the authority of God's chosen servants.

Christ-Centered Fulfillment

The rebellion of Korah and the 250 princes, a direct challenge to God's divinely appointed leadership and priestly order, finds its ultimate fulfillment and contrast in the person and work of Jesus Christ. While Korah and his company sought to seize authority for themselves, driven by ambition and envy, Christ, though being in very nature God, "did not consider equality with God something to be used to his own advantage; rather, he made himself nothing by taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness" (Philippians 2:6-7). He is the true and ultimate High Priest, not appointed by human lineage or ambition, but "after the order of Melchizedek" (Hebrews 7:17), having offered a perfect, once-for-all sacrifice for sin that truly grants access to God, unlike the temporary and insufficient sacrifices offered by the Levitical priesthood. The judgment that fell upon Korah and his followers foreshadows the ultimate judgment awaiting those who reject God's chosen King and His authority. Conversely, Christ, the true Son of God, was "given all authority in heaven and on earth" (Matthew 28:18) not through rebellion or self-exaltation, but through perfect obedience, even to death on a cross (Hebrews 5:8-9). He alone holds the keys to life and death, and through Him, believers are granted access to God, becoming a "royal priesthood" (1 Peter 2:9), a privilege Korah sought to usurp through rebellion, but which is freely given in Christ through grace.

Copy as

Public-domain commentary

Matthew Henry

From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry comments on passages, not single verses — this entry covers Numbers 16:1–11. His four-level outline is real structure in the source text, so it is rendered as structure.

1662–1714 · 11 verses
Passage under commentNumbers 16:1–11
I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points(1.) (2.) Details[1.] [2.] Fine details

Here is, I. An account of the rebels, who and what they were, not, as formerly, the mixed multitude and the dregs of the people, who are therefore never named, but men of distinction and quality, that made a figure. Korah was the ring-leader: he formed and headed the faction; therefore it is called the gainsaying of Korah, Jde 1:11. He was cousin-german to Moses, they were brothers' children, yet the nearness of the relation could not restrain him from being insolent and rude to Moses. Think it not strange if a man's foes be those of his own house. With him joined Dathan and Abiram, chief men of the tribe of Reuben, the eldest son of Jacob. Probably Korah was disgusted both at the preferment of Aaron to the priesthood and the constituting of Elizaphan to the head of the Kohathites (Num 3:30); and perhaps the Reubenites were angry that the tribe of Judah had the first post of honour in the camp. On is mentioned (Num 16:1) as one of the heads of the faction, but never after in the whole story, either because, as some think, he repented and left them, or because he did not make himself so remarkable as Dathan and Abiram did. The Kohathites encamped on the same side of the tabernacle that the Reubenites did, which perhaps gave Korah an opportunity of drawing them in, whence the Jews say, Woe to the wicked man, and woe to his neighbour, who is in danger of being infected by him. And, these being themselves men of renown, they seduced into the conspiracy two hundred and fifty princes of the assembly (Num 16:2); probably they were first-born, or at least heads of families, who, before the elevation of Aaron, had themselves ministered in holy things. Note, The pride, ambition, and emulation, of great men, have always been the occasion of a great deal of mischief both in churches and states. God by his grace make great men humble, and so give peace in our time, O Lord! Famous men, and men of renown, as these are described to be, were the great sinners of the old world, Gen 6:4. The fame and renown which they had did not content them; they were high, but would be higher, and thus the famous men became infamous.

II.The rebels' remonstrance, Num 16:3.

That which they quarrel with is the settlement of the priesthood upon Aaron and his family, which they think an honour too great for Moses to give and Aaron to accept, and so they are both charged with usurpation: You take too much upon you; or, "Let it suffice you to have domineered thus long, and now think of resigning your places to those who have as good a title to them and are as well able to manage them." 1. They proudly boast of the holiness of the congregation, and the presence of God in it. "They are holy, every one of them, and as fit to be employed in offering sacrifice as Aaron is, and as masters of families formerly were, and the Lord is among them, to direct and own them." Small reason they had to boast of the people's purity, or of God's favour, as the people had been so frequently and so lately polluted with sin, and were now under the marks of God's displeasure, which should have made them thankful for priests to mediate between them and God; but, instead of that, they envy them. 2. They unjustly charge Moses and Aaron with taking the honour they had to themselves, whereas it was evident, beyond contradiction, that they were called of God to it, Heb 5:4. So that they would either have no priests at all, nor any government, none to preside either in civil or sacred things, none over the congregation, none above it, or they would not acquiesce in that constitution of the government which God had appointed. See here, (1.) What spirit levellers are of, and those that despise dominions, and resist the powers that God has set over them; they are proud, envious, ambitious, turbulent, wicked, and unreasonable men. (2.) What usage even the best and most useful men may expect, even from those they have been serviceable to. If those be represented as usurpers that have the best titles, and those as tyrants that govern best, let them recollect that Moses and Aaron were thus abused.

III.Moses's conduct when their remonstrance was published against him. How did he take it?

1.He fell on his face (Num 16:4), as before, Num 14:5. Thus he showed how willing he would have been to yield to them, and how gladly he would have resigned his government, if it would have consisted with his duty to God and his fidelity to the trust reposed in him. Thus also he applied to God, by prayer, for direction what to say and to do upon this sad occasion. He would not speak to them till he had thus humbled and composed his own spirit (which could not but begin to be heated), and had received instruction from God. The heart of the wise in such a case studies to answer, and asks counsel at God's mouth.

2.He agrees to refer the case to God, and leave it to him to decide it, as one well assured of the goodness of his title, and yet well content to resign, if God thought fit, to gratify this discontented people with another nomination. An honest cause fears not a speedy trial; even tomorrow let it be brought on, Num 16:5-7. Let Korah and his partisans bring their censers, and offer incense before the Lord, and, if he testify his acceptance of them, well and good; Moses is now as willing that all the Lord's people should be priests, if God so pleased, as before that they should all be prophets, Num 11:29. But if God, upon an appeal to him, determine (as no doubt he would) for Aaron, they would find it highly dangerous to make the experiment: and therefore he puts it off till tomorrow, to try whether, when they had slept upon it, they would desist, and let fall their pretensions.

3.He argues the case fairly with them, to still the mutiny with fair reasoning, if possible, before the appeal came to God's tribunal, for then he knew it would end in the confusion of the complainants.

(1.)He calls them the sons of Levi, Num 16:7, and again Num 16:8. They were of his own tribe, nay, they were of God's tribe; it was therefore the worse in them thus to mutiny both against God and against him. It was not long since the sons of Levi had bravely appeared on God's side, in the matter of the golden calf, and got immortal honour by it; and shall those that were then the only innocents now be the leading criminals, and lose all the honour they had won? Could there be such chaff on God's floor? Levites, and yet rebels?

(2.)He retorts their charge upon themselves. They had unjustly charged Moses and Aaron with taking too much upon them, though they had done no more than what God put upon them; nay, says Moses, You take too much upon you, you sons of Levi. Note, Those that take upon them to control and contradict God's appointment take too much upon them. It is enough for us to submit; it is too much to prescribe.

(3.)He shows them the privilege they had as Levites, which was sufficient for them, they needed not to aspire to the honour of the priesthood, Num 16:9, Num 16:10. He reminds them how great the honour was to which they were preferred, as Levites.

[1.]They were separated from the congregation of Israel, distinguished from them, dignified above them; instead of complaining that Aaron's family was advanced above theirs, they ought to have been thankful that their tribe was advanced above the rest of the tribes, though they had been in all respects upon the level with them. Note, It will help to keep us from envying those that are above us duly to consider how many there are below us. Instead of fretting that any are preferred before us in honour, power, estate, or interest, in gifts, graces, or usefulness, we have reason to bless God if we, who are less than the least, are not put among the very last. Many perhaps who deserve better are not preferred so well.

[2.]They were separated to very great and valuable honours, First, To draw near to God, nearer than the common Israelites, though they also were a people near unto him; the nearer any are to God the greater is their honour. Secondly, To do the service of the tabernacle. It is honour enough to bear the vessels of the sanctuary, and to be employed in any part of the service of the tabernacle. God's service is not only perfect freedom, but high preferment. Thirdly, To stand before the congregation to minister unto them. Note, Those are truly great that serve the public, and it is the honour of God's ministers to be the church's ministers; nay, which adds to the dignity put upon them,

[3.]It was the God of Israel himself that separated them. It was his act and deed to put them into their place, and therefore they ought not to have been discontented: and he it was likewise that put Aaron into his place, and therefore they ought not to have envied him.

(4.)He convicts them of the sin of undervaluing those privileges: Seemeth it a small thing unto you? As if he had said, "It ill becomes you of all men to grudge Aaron the priesthood, when at the same time that he was advanced to that honour you were designed for another honour dependent upon it, and shine with rays borrowed from him." Note, [1.] The privilege of drawing near to the God of Israel is not a small thing in itself, and therefore must not appear small to us. To those who neglect opportunities of drawing near to God, who are careless and formal in it, to whom it is a task and not a pleasure, we may properly put this question: "Seemeth it a small thing to you that God has made you a people near unto him?" [2.] Those who aspire after and usurp the honours forbidden them put a great contempt upon the honours allowed them. We have each of us as good a share of reputation as God sees fit for us, and sees us fit for, and much better than we deserve; and we ought to rest satisfied with it, and not, as these, exercise ourselves in things too high for us: Seek you the priesthood also? They would not own that they sought it, but Moses saw that they had this in their eye; the law had provided very well for those that served at the altar, and therefore they would put in for the office.

(5.)He interprets their mutiny to be a rebellion against God (Num 16:11); while they pretended to assert the holiness and liberty of the Israel of God, they really took up arms against the God of Israel: You are gathered together against the Lord. Note, Those that strive against God's ordinances and providences, whatever they pretend, and whether they are aware of it or no, do indeed strive with their Maker. Those resist the prince who resist those that are commissioned by him: for, alas! says Moses, What is Aaron, that you murmur against him? If murmurers and complainers would consider that the instruments they quarrel with are but instruments whom God employs, and that they are but what he makes them, and neither more nor less, better nor worse, they would not be so bold and free in their censures and reproaches as they are. Those that found the priesthood, as it was settled, a blessing, must give all the praise to God; but if any found it a burden they must not therefore quarrel with Aaron, who is but what he is made, and does but as he is bidden. Thus he interested God in the cause, and so might be sure of speeding well in his appeal.

Copy as

Historical interpretation

Twelve Centuries of Reception

2 surviving comments on this verse. Each one is dated, so this reads as a timeline rather than a list.

2 quotes · AD 585–1781
Post-NiceneEarly MedievalMedieval
600700800900100011001200130014001500160017001800

Select a marker to jump to its quote. Markers stagger vertically where authors wrote within a few decades of each other.

AD 585CassiodorusPost-NiceneSourceEXPOSITION OF THE PSALMS 105:16-17
Their bellies’ fullness was followed by rebellion, which often rouses occasions of destructive danger. We say that a person is provoked when roused to anger by wicked deeds or very harsh words of others. The verse points to the incident when Dathan and Abiram roused strife and sought distinction for themselves. So their punishment ensued; for they provoked the holy men, which led to their own destruction, for they spoke through jealousy, and this is acknowledged to have displeased the Lord. This is aptly mentioned among the Lord’s praises because he is seen to have avenged his servants.As Numbers attests, it is clear that this befell the men who with the poisonous teeth of envy sought the heavenly favor bestowed on Aaron and Moses. Thus Dathan and Abiram wantonly seized for themselves the distinction which had been bestowed by the Lord’s kindness on Aaron and Moses. A similar end came on both of them because their motive in causing division was the same. They were swallowed up by the earth because they were steeped in earthly things, so that the nature of their punishment itself witnesses to their criminal deeds.
AD 1781Richard ChallonerMedieval
Rose up: The crime of these men, which was punished in so remarkable a manner, was that of schism, and of rebellion against the authority established by God in the church; and their pretending to the priesthood without being lawfully called and sent: the same is the case of all modern sectaries.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Numbers 16:2 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.

Related study articles8