1 Chronicles 27:33

Translation
King James Version
And Ahithophel was the king's counsellor: and Hushai the Archite was the king's companion:
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
And Ahithophel H302 was the king's H4428 counsellor H3289: and Hushai H2365 the Archite H757 was the king's H4428 companion H7453:
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
Achitofel was an adviser to the king. Hushai the Archi was the king's confidant;
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
Ahithophel was the king’s counselor. Hushai the Archite was the king’s friend.
Ask
American Standard Version
and Ahithophel was the king’s counsellor: and Hushai the Archite was the king’s friend:
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
Ahithophel was the king’s counselor: and Hushai the Archite was the king’s friend:
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
And Ahitophel was the Kings counseller, and Hushai the Archite the Kings friend.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
and Ahithophel is counsellor to the king; and Hushai the Archite is the friend of the king;
Ask
See also
2 Samuel 15:372 Samuel 15:122 Samuel 15:322 Samuel 16:162 Samuel 16:17Psalms 55:132 Samuel 17:23
In the KJVVerse 11,143 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

1 Chronicles 27:33 succinctly highlights two pivotal figures in King David's administration: Ahithophel, the esteemed royal counselor, and Hushai the Archite, the king's trusted companion. This verse, embedded within a comprehensive catalog of David's governmental and military officials, serves as a concise historical record of their significant roles during the established and organized period of David's reign, subtly setting the stage for their later, dramatically contrasting roles in the unfolding narrative of David's life.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: Chapter 27 of 1 Chronicles provides an exhaustive and highly organized account of King David's administrative and military structure. Following the detailed listing of the twelve monthly military divisions (verses 1-15) and various tribal leaders (verses 16-22), the chapter transitions to an enumeration of key royal officials responsible for the kingdom's treasury, agriculture, and other vital functions (verses 25-31). Verses 32-34 specifically focus on David's inner circle of personal advisors and close associates, underscoring the critical importance of counsel and companionship in the effective governance of the monarchy. Within this meticulously ordered inventory, 1 Chronicles 27:33 precisely places Ahithophel and Hushai as central figures in David's court, reflecting the Chronicler's emphasis on the stability and well-ordered nature of David's kingdom.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: King David's reign, particularly after the consolidation of his kingdom, was characterized by a sophisticated administrative system, a hallmark of successful ancient Near Eastern monarchies. Kings relied heavily on a network of advisors to manage state affairs, provide strategic counsel, and maintain internal stability. The distinction between a "counselor" (Ahithophel) and a "companion" (Hushai) reflects the nuanced roles within the royal court: the former offered official, strategic advice, often with significant authority, while the latter provided personal support, loyalty, and intimate counsel, acting as a confidant. The mention of "the Archite" for Hushai grounds him geographically, likely referring to a native of Archi, a region near Bethel in Ephraimite territory, indicating his known origin and status within the kingdom.
  • Key Themes: This verse, within its broader chapter, contributes to several significant themes. Firstly, it underscores David's Organized Kingdom, showcasing the meticulous planning and delegation that characterized his successful reign and the importance of a well-structured government for effective leadership. Secondly, it highlights The Dual Role of Counsel and Companionship, distinguishing between strategic advisors and intimate friends, both vital for a king's governance and personal well-being. Finally, for readers familiar with the broader biblical narrative, the mention of Ahithophel and Hushai carries a profound sense of Foreshadowing of Future Events. While 1 Chronicles generally presents a more idealized view of David's reign, omitting many of his personal failings and the full extent of Absalom's rebellion, the inclusion of these two names subtly anticipates the dramatic crisis where Ahithophel, famed for his shrewd counsel, would betray David by joining Absalom, while Hushai would remain fiercely loyal, acting as a double agent to thwart Ahithophel's counsel and save David. This quiet anticipation underscores the theme of God's sovereignty working through human loyalties and betrayals.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • Counsellor (Hebrew, yâʻats', H3289): Derived from the primitive root H3289, meaning "to advise," "consult," or "give counsel." This term denotes someone who provides strategic guidance, particularly in matters of state, military, or judicial decisions. Ahithophel was renowned for his exceptional wisdom, so much so that his counsel was considered "as if one had inquired at the oracle of God" (2 Samuel 16:23). His role was one of profound influence and intellectual authority within the kingdom.
  • Companion (Hebrew, rêaʻ', H7453): This word signifies an intimate associate, a close friend, or someone with whom one shares a bond of personal trust. Unlike the formal, strategic role of a counselor, a companion implies a relationship built on loyalty, shared experiences, and personal confidence. Hushai's designation as David's companion highlights not just an official position but a deep, personal connection to the king, emphasizing his role as a confidant and trusted ally.

Verse Breakdown

  • "And Ahithophel [was] the king's counsellor:": This clause establishes Ahithophel's official and highly respected position within David's court. He was not merely an advisor but "the king's counsellor," indicating a primary and perhaps unparalleled role in providing strategic and political guidance. His reputation for wisdom made his counsel almost infallible in the eyes of his contemporaries, setting the stage for the dramatic impact of his later defection.
  • "and Hushai the Archite [was] the king's companion:": This clause identifies Hushai by name and by his geographical origin ("the Archite"), immediately distinguishing him from Ahithophel by his role. As the "king's companion," Hushai held a position of personal intimacy and trust, suggesting a relationship built on loyalty and friendship rather than purely strategic advice. This personal bond would prove crucial in the time of crisis, highlighting the value of genuine loyalty over mere competence.

Literary Devices

The verse employs several subtle yet powerful literary devices. Juxtaposition is evident in the immediate pairing of Ahithophel and Hushai. By placing these two figures side-by-side, the Chronicler implicitly invites the reader to consider their contrasting natures and fates, especially for those familiar with the fuller narrative in 2 Samuel. This leads to a strong element of Foreshadowing. While 1 Chronicles itself does not detail Absalom's rebellion, the mere mention of these two names together serves as a potent reminder of the pivotal, opposing roles they would later play. Ahithophel, the wise counselor who betrays, and Hushai, the loyal companion who thwarts, create a dramatic tension that echoes through the historical record. Furthermore, there is a subtle Irony in Ahithophel's designation. He is introduced as the epitome of wise counsel, yet his ultimate act is one of profound folly and betrayal, leading to his own demise. Conversely, Hushai, the "companion," proves to be the true strategic genius in the moment of crisis, demonstrating that loyalty can be a more powerful force than mere intellectual prowess.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

This seemingly simple verse offers profound theological insights into the nature of leadership, wisdom, and loyalty within God's sovereign plan. It underscores the biblical principle that wise counsel is essential for effective governance and personal well-being, yet it also cautions that even the most brilliant human wisdom can be corrupted by disloyalty or self-interest. The contrasting fates of Ahithophel and Hushai highlight the critical difference between competence and character, reminding us that true wisdom is often rooted in faithfulness to God and to those He has placed in authority. Ultimately, the narrative of these two men, especially as understood through the broader biblical story, serves as a powerful testament to God's ability to overrule human plans, even the most cunning, to accomplish His divine purposes, often through unexpected means or seemingly weaker vessels.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

1 Chronicles 27:33, though brief, offers enduring lessons for navigating relationships and leadership in our own lives. It compels us to consider the quality of counsel we seek and the nature of the companions we choose. Just as David relied on both strategic advisors and trusted friends, we too need a diverse network of support—those who offer objective wisdom and those who provide unwavering loyalty. This verse challenges us to discern between true wisdom, which aligns with God's will and is coupled with integrity, and mere cleverness that can be easily swayed by personal ambition or disloyalty. It reminds us that while competence is valuable, character and faithfulness are paramount, especially in times of adversity. We are called to be both wise in seeking counsel and steadfast in our own loyalty, recognizing that God often works through our relationships to guide, protect, and fulfill His purposes.

Questions for Reflection

  • How do you discern between wise counsel and self-serving advice in your life, particularly from those in positions of influence?
  • What qualities do you prioritize in those you consider close "companions" or trusted advisors, beyond their skills or intelligence?
  • In what ways does this verse challenge you to cultivate both wisdom in your decisions and unwavering loyalty in your relationships, especially when faced with difficult choices?

FAQ

Why does 1 Chronicles mention these two men together, given their later conflict?

Answer: The Chronicler's primary purpose in 1 Chronicles is to present a positive and idealized account of David's reign, emphasizing the legitimate lineage of the kings of Judah and the proper worship of God. Chapter 27 specifically details the well-ordered and comprehensive administrative structure of David's kingdom. The inclusion of Ahithophel and Hushai in 1 Chronicles 27:33 is a factual record of their prominent and legitimate roles within this established administration before the dramatic events of Absalom's rebellion. For the original audience, who would have been familiar with the fuller narrative in 2 Samuel, their joint mention here serves as a subtle, yet powerful, piece of foreshadowing. It highlights the stark contrast between their initial, respected positions and their later, opposing actions, underscoring that even in a divinely sanctioned kingdom, human loyalty can be tested and found wanting, and God's sovereignty can turn even the most cunning counsel into foolishness (2 Samuel 17:14).

What is the significance of "the Archite" for Hushai?

Answer: "The Archite" identifies Hushai's tribal or geographical origin, indicating he was a native of Archi, a region likely located near Bethel, within the territory of Ephraim. This detail is significant for several reasons. Firstly, it grounds Hushai historically and geographically, adding to the veracity and specificity of the Chronicler's record. Unlike Ahithophel, whose fame was tied to his wisdom, Hushai is identified by his place of origin, suggesting he was a known figure from a particular lineage or locality. Secondly, in a culture where tribal and geographical identity were crucial, this designation would have immediately placed Hushai within the social and political landscape of David's kingdom. It underscores that David's court drew its personnel from various parts of Israel, reflecting the king's broad reach and the unified nature of his reign.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

The contrasting figures of Ahithophel and Hushai, representing the epitome of human wisdom corrupted by betrayal versus steadfast loyalty, find their ultimate fulfillment and resolution in the person of Jesus Christ. While Ahithophel's counsel was esteemed as divine, it ultimately led to his own destruction through his disloyalty; in stark contrast, Christ is the true Wonderful Counselor, whose wisdom is not merely human but divine, perfect, and eternally faithful. Unlike Ahithophel, whose counsel was turned to foolishness, Jesus' counsel is always true, always leads to life, and can never be thwarted. Furthermore, the dynamic between a "counselor" and a "companion" points to Christ's multifaceted relationship with humanity. He is not only our perfect wisdom and guide, but also our ultimate "companion," who calls us friends, laying down His life for us. The betrayal David experienced from Ahithophel, a trusted advisor, foreshadows the ultimate betrayal of Christ by Judas, one of His own companions (Matthew 26:47-50). Yet, unlike David, who relied on Hushai's human loyalty, Christ's victory over betrayal and death was secured by His own divine power and unwavering faithfulness to the Father's counsel. He is the Lamb of God whose ultimate sacrifice, the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world, perfectly fulfills God's eternal counsel for humanity's redemption, establishing a kingdom built on perfect wisdom and absolute, unwavering loyalty.

Copy as

Commentary on 1 Chronicles 27 verses 16–34

We have here an account,

I. Of the princes of the tribes. Something of the ancient order instituted by Moses in the wilderness was still kept up, that every tribe should have its prince or chief. It is probable that it was kept up all along, either by election or by succession, in the same family; and those are here named who were found in that office when this account was taken. Elihu, or Eliab, who was prince of Judah, was the eldest son of Jesse, and descended in a right line from Nahshon and Salmon, the princes of this tribe in Moses's time. Whether these princes were of the nature of lord-lieutenants that guided them in their military affairs, or chief-justices that presided in their courts of judgment, does not appear. Their power, we may suppose, was much less now that all the tribes were united under one king than it had been when, for the most part, they acted separately. Our religion obliges us to be subject, not only to the king as supreme, but unto governors under him (Pe1 2:13, Pe1 2:14), the princes that decree justice. Of Benjamin was Jaaziel the son of Abner, Ch1 27:21. Though Abner was David's enemy, and opposed his coming to the throne, yet David would not oppose the preferment of his son, but perhaps nominated him to this post of honour, which teaches us to render good for evil.

II. Of the numbering of the people, Ch1 27:23, Ch1 27:24. It is here said, 1. That when David ordered the people to be numbered he forbade the numbering of those under twenty years old, thinking thereby to save the reflection which what he did might otherwise cast upon the promise that they should be innumerable; yet it was but a poor salvo, for it had never been customary to number those under twenty, and the promise of their numbers chiefly respected the effective men. 2. That the account which David took of the people, in the pride of his heart, turned to no good account; for it was never perfected, nor done with exactness, nor was it ever recorded as an authentic account. Joab was disgusted with it, and did it by halves; David was ashamed of it, and willing it should be forgotten, because there fell wrath for it against Israel. A good man cannot, in the reflection, please himself with that which he knows God is displeased with, cannot make use of that, nor take comfort in that, which is obtained by sin.

III. Of the officers of the court. 1. The rulers of the king's substance (as they are called, Ch1 27:31), such as had the oversight and charge of the king's tillage, his vineyards, his olive-yards, his herds, his camels, his asses, his flocks. Here are no officers for state, none for sport, no master of the wardrobe, no master of the ceremonies, no master of the horse, no master of the hounds, but all for service, agreeable to the simplicity and plainness of those times. David was a great soldier, a great scholar, and a great prince, and yet a great husband of his estate, kept a great deal of ground in his own hand, and stocked it, not for pleasure, but for profit; for the king himself is served of the field, Ecc 5:9. Those magistrates that would have their subjects industrious must themselves be examples of industry and application to business. We find, however, that afterwards the poor of the land were thought good enough to be vine-dressers and husbandmen, Kg2 25:12. Now David put his great men to preside in these employments. 2. The attendants on the king's person. They were such as were eminent for wisdom, being designed for conversation. His uncle, who was a wise man and a scribe, not only well skilled in politics, but well read in the scriptures, was his counsellor, Ch1 27:32. Another, who no doubt excelled in learning and prudence, was tutor to his children. Ahithophel, a very cunning man, was his counsellor: but Hushai, an honest man, was his companion and confidant. It does not appear that he had many counsellors; but those he had were men of great abilities. Much of the wisdom of princes is seen in the choice of their ministry. But David, though he had all these trusty and well-beloved cousins and counsellors about him, preferred his Bible before them all. Psa 119:24, Thy testimonies are my delight and my counsellors.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 16–34. Public domain.
Copy as
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying 1 Chronicles 27:33 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

Read & Compare

Commentaries

Original Language & Research

Sermons, Hymns & Audio

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.