Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
And the spirit of jealousy come upon him, and he be jealous of his wife, and she be defiled: or if the spirit of jealousy come upon him, and he be jealous of his wife, and she be not defiled:
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
And the spirit H7307 of jealousy H7068 come H5674 upon him, and he be jealous H7065 of his wife H802, and she be defiled H2930: or if the spirit H7307 of jealousy H7068 come H5674 upon him, and he be jealous H7065 of his wife H802, and she be not defiled H2930:
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
then, if a spirit of jealousy comes over him, and he is jealous of his wife, and she has become impure - or, for that matter, if the spirit of jealousy comes over him, and he is jealous of his wife, and she has not become impure -
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
and if a feeling of jealousy comes over her husband and he suspects his wife who has defiled herself—or if a feeling of jealousy comes over him and he suspects her even though she has not defiled herself—
Ask
American Standard Version
and the spirit of jealousy come upon him, and he be jealous of his wife, and she be defiled: or if the spirit of jealousy come upon him, and he be jealous of his wife, and she be not defiled:
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
and the spirit of jealousy comes on him, and he is jealous of his wife, and she is defiled: or if the spirit of jealousy comes on him, and he is jealous of his wife, and she isn’t defiled:
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
If he be moued with a ielous minde, so that he is ielous ouer his wife, which is defiled, or if he haue a ielous minde, so that he is ielous ouer his wife, which is not defiled,
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
and a spirit of jealousy hath passed over him, and he hath been jealous of his wife, and she hath been defiled; --or, a spirit of jealousy hath passed over him, and he hath been jealous of his wife, and she hath not been defiled--
Ask

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

Numbers 5:14 introduces the emotional catalyst for the "Ordeal of the Bitter Water," a unique divinely prescribed ritual in ancient Israel designed to resolve cases of suspected marital infidelity where concrete evidence was lacking. It highlights the husband's intense "spirit of jealousy" as the initiating factor, whether his wife was actually defiled or not, underscoring the serious nature of unproven suspicion and the community's reliance on divine intervention to ascertain truth and maintain justice within the sanctity of marriage.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: Numbers 5:14 is strategically placed within a broader legal and ceremonial section of the book of Numbers, specifically following laws concerning ritual purity and restitution. The "Ordeal of the Bitter Water" itself, detailed in Numbers 5:11-31, is initiated by the internal state described in this verse. Preceding this passage are instructions regarding the removal of the ritually unclean from the Israelite camp (Numbers 5:1-4) and laws concerning restitution for wrongs committed, particularly against God or one's neighbor (Numbers 5:5-10). The progression from general purity and justice to the highly sensitive and private matter of marital fidelity emphasizes that even hidden sins within the most intimate relationships are subject to divine scrutiny and judgment, highlighting God's comprehensive concern for holiness and order within His covenant community.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: In ancient Israel, as in many ancient Near Eastern societies, marital fidelity was paramount, forming the bedrock of family, lineage, and tribal structures. Adultery was considered a grave offense, often punishable by death, as stipulated in laws like Leviticus 20:10 and Deuteronomy 22:22. However, the private nature of such an act often meant a lack of witnesses, creating a dilemma for justice. The "Ordeal of the Bitter Water" provided a unique legal and theological mechanism, functioning as a "divine lie detector" to address situations of unproven suspicion. This ritual served as a crucial safeguard against both unpunished infidelity and baseless slander, preventing vigilante justice or arbitrary accusations by placing the ultimate judgment squarely in God's hands. It reflects a societal understanding where divine law permeated all aspects of life, even the most ambiguous and emotionally charged domestic disputes.
  • Key Themes: This verse, and the broader ordeal it introduces, contributes to several key themes within Numbers and the Pentateuch. It powerfully underscores the theme of Divine Justice and Omniscience, demonstrating God's ability to discern hidden truths and administer perfect justice where human evidence is insufficient. It highlights the Sanctity of Marriage as a foundational covenant within Israelite society, emphasizing its protection by divine law. Furthermore, it speaks to the theme of Purity and Defilement, not just in a ritual sense, but in a moral one, showing that moral defilement within the most intimate relationships has spiritual consequences that require divine intervention. Finally, it reinforces the theme of God's Presence and Active Involvement in the daily lives and disputes of His people, providing a structured means for resolving conflict and maintaining order.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • Spirit (Hebrew, rûwach', H7307): In this context, rûwach refers not to a demonic entity, but to an intense internal disposition, a powerful emotional impulse or inclination that "comes upon" a person. It signifies a profound, overwhelming feeling of suspicion and jealousy that grips the husband, compelling him to seek divine intervention. This usage aligns with other biblical instances where rûwach describes a strong human emotion or attitude, such as a "spirit of slumber" or a "spirit of deep sleep."
  • Jealousy (Hebrew, qinʼâh', H7068): This term is central to the verse. Qinʼâh carries a dual semantic range in Scripture. It can denote righteous zeal or fervent passion, as seen in God's holy jealousy for His covenant people. However, in Numbers 5:14, it unequivocally refers to a negative, destructive, and often unfounded suspicion or envy regarding another's fidelity or possession. It describes a possessive and troubled emotional state that drives the husband to public accusation, even without concrete proof.
  • Defiled (Hebrew, ṭâmêʼ', H2930): Derived from a primitive root meaning "to be foul," ṭâmêʼ here refers specifically to ceremonial or moral contamination. In the context of marital fidelity, it signifies the moral and spiritual impurity resulting from adultery. The term underscores the grave nature of infidelity, which not only breaks a covenant but also renders one "unclean" in the eyes of God and the community, requiring divine judgment or purification.

Verse Breakdown

  • "And the spirit of jealousy come upon him,": This phrase establishes the internal, emotional trigger for the entire ordeal. It signifies an overwhelming and compelling sense of suspicion that grips the husband, an unshakeable conviction that his wife may have been unfaithful, even in the absence of tangible evidence. This internal state is the sole prerequisite for initiating the divine test.
  • "and he be jealous of his wife,": This clause reiterates and clarifies the nature of the "spirit" mentioned previously. It emphasizes the direct object of his suspicion: his own wife. The repetition underscores the intensity and focus of his emotional state, highlighting the personal and relational nature of the conflict and the possessive aspect of his jealousy.
  • "and she be defiled:": This presents the first scenario: the husband's jealousy is warranted because his wife has indeed committed adultery. This possibility is explicitly stated, acknowledging that the suspicion may be accurate, and thus the ritual serves to confirm actual guilt and bring about the prescribed consequences.
  • "or if the spirit of jealousy come upon him, and he be jealous of his wife,": This introduces the second, contrasting scenario, repeating the initial trigger for emphasis. The repetition highlights that the the same intense internal emotional state can exist regardless of the wife's actual guilt or innocence, making the divine test absolutely necessary to distinguish truth from mere suspicion.
  • "and she be not defiled:": This presents the crucial alternative: the husband's intense jealousy is unfounded, and his wife is innocent. This scenario is equally important, as the ritual is designed not only to expose guilt but also to vindate the innocent, protecting them from false accusations, public shame, and the destructive power of unproven suspicion.

Literary Devices

Numbers 5:14 employs several key literary devices that underscore its legal and theological significance. The most prominent is Repetition, particularly the phrase "the spirit of jealousy come upon him, and he be jealous of his wife." This reiteration serves to emphasize the driving force behind the ordeal, highlighting that the husband's internal state, rather than external evidence, is the initiating factor. This repetition also sets up a clear Parallelism or Antithesis, contrasting the two possible outcomes: "she be defiled" versus "she be not defiled." This structural choice clearly presents the two mutually exclusive possibilities that the ordeal is designed to resolve. Furthermore, the verse functions as a Conditional Statement within a larger legal framework, outlining the specific circumstances ("if the spirit of jealousy come upon him...") that necessitate the prescribed divine judgment. The precise and formulaic language reflects the legalistic nature of the passage, typical of Mosaic law, ensuring clarity and strict adherence to the divine protocol.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

Numbers 5:14, as part of the Ordeal of the Bitter Water, powerfully illustrates God's profound concern for truth, justice, and the sanctity of the marital covenant within the community of Israel. It reveals a God who is not distant from the intimate and often hidden struggles of His people, but actively intervenes to expose hidden sin and vindicate the innocent. This passage underscores the destructive nature of unaddressed suspicion and the need for divine arbitration when human evidence is insufficient, demonstrating that no sin, whether open or concealed, escapes God's notice. It ultimately points to the divine attribute of omniscience, a God who "sees all things" and whose judgment is perfectly just, ensuring that even the most private transgressions or false accusations are brought to light.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

While the specific ritual of the bitter water is no longer practiced, Numbers 5:14 offers timeless principles for contemporary life. It serves as a stark reminder of the profound value God places on marital fidelity and the devastating impact of infidelity and unresolved suspicion on relationships. In a world where trust is often fragile and accusations can run rampant, this passage calls us to a higher standard of truthfulness and integrity, both in our actions and in our hearts. It challenges us to confront the destructive power of jealousy and suspicion, urging us to seek resolution through honest communication, wise counsel, and ultimately, by entrusting our deepest relational challenges to God, who alone knows the full truth of every situation. It also implicitly warns against hasty judgment based solely on suspicion, emphasizing the importance of seeking clarity and truth, and extending grace when possible, rather than allowing corrosive doubt to fester.

Questions for Reflection

  • How does the "spirit of jealousy" described in this verse relate to or differ from jealousy we experience today, and how should we manage such emotions?
  • What does God's provision of such a ritual reveal about His character and His concern for justice and truth in human relationships?
  • In what ways can we, as believers, apply the underlying principles of seeking truth, promoting justice, and protecting the sanctity of relationships in our daily lives, even without a specific ritual?

FAQ

Was the "spirit of jealousy" in Numbers 5:14 a demonic influence?

Answer: No, the "spirit of jealousy" (ruach qin'ah in Hebrew) in Numbers 5:14 does not refer to a demonic influence or an evil spirit. Instead, it describes an intense, overwhelming human emotion or disposition—a profound and compelling sense of suspicion and possessiveness that grips the husband. The Hebrew word ruach can refer to a spiritual entity, but it also commonly denotes a "wind," "breath," or an internal "spirit" or "disposition" of a person, such as a "spirit of anger" or a "spirit of humility." In this context, it signifies an internal conviction or emotional state so strong that it compels the husband to bring his wife before the priest for a divine investigation, even in the absence of concrete evidence. This interpretation is consistent with other biblical uses of ruach to describe human emotional states, such as a "spirit of deep sleep" (Isaiah 29:10) or a "spirit of harlotry" (Hosea 4:12). The ritual itself was designed to ascertain truth divinely, not to cast out a demon.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

The Ordeal of the Bitter Water, initiated by the "spirit of jealousy" in Numbers 5:14, finds its ultimate fulfillment and profound theological resonance in the person and work of Jesus Christ. This ancient ritual, designed to expose hidden sin and vindicate the innocent through divine intervention, foreshadows Christ as the perfect Judge who discerns the secrets of the heart, for "nothing in all creation is hidden from God's sight" (Hebrews 4:12-13). While the old covenant ritual relied on a physical test and a Levitical priest, Jesus Himself is the ultimate High Priest (Hebrews 4:14-16) who perfectly reveals truth and brings justice. Furthermore, the ordeal's concern for purity and the consequences of defilement point to Christ's work in providing true purification from sin. Unlike the bitter waters that brought a curse upon the guilty, Jesus, the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world, became the curse for us on the cross (Galatians 3:13), taking away the defilement of sin and offering genuine righteousness to those who believe (2 Corinthians 5:21). In Christ, the need for a ritualistic test for hidden sin is superseded by His perfect knowledge and His atoning sacrifice, which cleanses us from all unrighteousness (1 John 1:9), offering not a curse for the guilty, but grace, forgiveness, and new life to all who trust in Him.

Copy as

Commentary on Numbers 5 verses 11–31

I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points

We have here the law concerning the solemn trial of a wife whose husband was jealous of her. Observe,

I. What was the case supposed: That a man had some reason to suspect his wife to have committed adultery, Num 5:12-14. Here, 1. The sin of adultery is justly represented as an exceedingly sinful sin; it is going aside from God and virtue, and the good way, Pro 2:17. It is committing a trespass against the husband, robbing him of his honour, alienating his right, introducing a spurious breed into his family to share with his children in his estate, and violating her covenant with him. It is being defiled; for nothing pollutes the mind and conscience more than this sin does. 2. It is supposed to be a sin which great care is taken by the sinners to conceal, which there is no witness of. The eye of the adulterer waits for the twilight, Job 24:15. And the adulteress takes her opportunity when the good man is not at home, Pro 7:19. It would not covet to be secret if it were not shameful; and the devil who draws sinners to this sin teaches them how to cover it. 3. The spirit of jealousy is supposed to come upon the husband, of which Solomon says, It is the rage of a man (Pro 6:34), and that it is cruel as the grave, Sol 8:6. 4. "Yet" (say the Jewish writers) "he must make it appear that he has some just cause for the suspicion." The rule they give is, "If the husband have said unto his wife before witnesses, 'Be not thou in secret with such a man;' and, notwithstanding that admonition, it is afterwards proved that she was in secret with that man, though her father or her brother, then he may compel her to drink the bitter water." But the law here does not tie him to that particular method of proving the just cause of his suspicion; it might be otherwise proved. In case it could be proved that she had committed adultery, she was to be put to death (Lev 20:10); but, if it was uncertain, then this law took place. Hence, (1.) Let all wives be admonished not to give any the least occasion for the suspicion of their chastity; it is not enough that they abstain from the evil of uncleanness, but they must abstain from all appearance of it, from every thing that looks like it, or leads to it, or may give the least umbrage to jealousy; for how great a matter may a little fire kindle! (2.) Let all husbands be admonished not to entertain any causeless or unjust suspicions of their wives. If charity in general, much more conjugal affection, teaches to think no evil, Co1 13:5. It is the happiness of the virtuous woman that the heart of her husband does safely trust in her, Pro 31:11.

II. What was the course prescribed in this case, that, if the suspected wife was innocent, she might not continue under the reproach and uneasiness of her husband's jealousy, and, if guilty, her sin might find her out, and others might hear, and fear, and take warning.

1.The process of the trial must be thus: - (1.) Her husband must bring her to the priest, with the witnesses that could prove the ground of his suspicion, and desire that she might be put upon her trial. The Jews say that the priest was first to endeavour to persuade her to confess the truth, saying to this purport, "Dear daughter, perhaps thou wast overtaken by drinking wine, or wast carried away by the heat of youth or the examples of bad neighbours; come, confess the truth, for the sake of his great name which is described in the most sacred ceremony, and do not let it be blotted out with the bitter water." If she confessed, saying, "I am defiled," she was not put to death, but was divorced and lost her dowry; if she said, "I am pure," then they proceeded. (2.) He must bring a coarse offering of barley-meal, without oil or frankincense, agreeably to the present afflicted state of his family; for a great affliction it was either to have cause to be jealous or to be jealous without cause. It is an offering of memorial, to signify that what was to be done was intended as a religious appeal to the omniscience and justice of God. (3.) The priest was to prepare the water of jealousy, the holy water out of the laver at which the priests were to wash when they ministered; this must be brought in an earthen vessel, containing (they say) about a pint; and it must be an earthen vessel, because the coarser and plainer every thing was the more agreeable it was to the occasion. Dust must be put into the water, to signify the reproach she lay under, and the shame she ought to take to herself, putting her mouth in the dust; but dust from the floor of the tabernacle, to put an honour upon every thing that pertained to the place God had chosen to put his name there, and to keep up in the people a reverence for it; see Joh 8:6. (4.) The woman was to be set before the Lord, at the east gate of the temple-court (say the Jews), and her head was to be uncovered, in token of her sorrowful condition; and there she stood for a spectacle to the world, that other women might learn not to do after her lewdness, Eze 23:48. Only the Jews say, "Her own servants were not to be present, that she might not seem vile in their sight, who were to give honour to her; her husband also must be dismissed." (5.) The priest was to adjure her to tell the truth, and to denounce the curse of God against her if she were guilty, and to declare what would be the effect of her drinking the water of jealousy, Num 5:19-22. He must assure her that, if she were innocent, the water would do her no harm, Num 5:19. None need fear the curse of the law if they have not broken the commands of the law. But, if she were guilty, this water would be poison to her, it would make her belly to swell and her thigh to rot, and she should be a curse or abomination among her people, Num 5:21, Num 5:22. To this she must say, Amen, as Israel must do to the curses pronounced on mount Ebal, Deu 27:15-26. Some think the Amen, being doubled, respects both parts of the adjuration, both that which freed her if innocent and that which condemned her if guilty. No woman, if she were guilty, could say Amen to this adjuration, and drink the water upon it, unless she disbelieved the truth of God or defied his justice, and had come to such a pitch of impudence and hard-heartedness in sin as to challenge God Almighty to do his worst, and choose rather to venture upon his curse than to give him glory by making confession; thus has whoredom taken away the heart. (6.) The priest was to write this curse in a scrip or scroll o parchment, verbatim - word for word, as he had expressed it, and then to wipe or scrape out what he had written into the water (Num 5:23), to signify that it was that curse which impregnated the water, and gave it its strength to effect what was intended. It signified that, if she were innocent, the curse should be blotted out and never appear against her, as it is written, Isa 43:25, I am he that blotteth out thy transgression, and Psa 51:9, Blot out my iniquities; but that, if she were guilty, the curse, as it was written, being infused into the water, would enter into her bowels with the water, even like oil into her bones (Psa 109:18), as we read of a curse entering into a house, Zac 5:4. (7.) The woman must then drink the water (Num 5:24); it is called the bitter water, some think because they put wormwood in it to make it bitter, or rather because it caused the curse. Thus sin is called an evil thing and a bitter for the same reason, because it causeth the curse, Jer 2:19. If she had been guilty (and otherwise it did not cause the curse), she was made to know that though her stolen waters had been sweet, and her bread eaten in secret pleasant, yet the end was bitter as wormwood, Pro 9:17, and Pro 5:4. Let all that meddle with forbidden pleasures know that they will be bitterness in the latter end. The Jews say that if, upon denouncing the curse, the woman was so terrified that she durst not drink the water, but confessed she was defiled, the priest flung down the water, and cast her offering among the ashes, and she was divorced without dowry: if she confessed not, and yet would not drink, they forced her to it; and, if she was ready to throw it up again, they hastened her away, that she might not pollute the holy place. (8.) Before she drank the water, the jealousy-offering was waved and offered upon the altar (Num 5:25, Num 5:26); a handful of it was burnt for a memorial, and the remainder of it eaten by the priest, unless the husband was a priest, and then it was scattered among the ashes. This offering in the midst of the transaction signified that the whole was an appeal to God, as a God that knows all things, and from whom no secret is hid. (9.) All things being thus performed according to the law, they were to wait the issue. The water, with a little dust put into it, and the scrapings of a written parchment, had no natural tendency at all to do either good or hurt; but if God was thus appealed to in the way of an instituted ordinance, though otherwise the innocent might have continued under suspicion and the guilty undiscovered, yet God would so far own his own institution as that in a little time, by the miraculous operation of Providence, the innocency of the innocent should be cleared, and the sin of the guilty should find them out. [1.] If the suspected woman was really guilty, the water she drank would be poison to her (Num 5:27), her belly would swell and her thigh rot by a vile disease for vile deserts, and she would mourn at the last when her flesh and body were consumed, Pro 5:11. Bishop Patrick says, from some of the Jewish writers, that the effect of these waters appeared immediately, she grew pale, and her eyes ready to start out of her head. Dr. Lightfoot says that sometimes it appeared not for two or three years, but she bore no children, was sickly, languished, and rotted at last; it is probable that some indications appeared immediately. The rabbin say that the adulterer also died in the same day and hour that the adulteress did, and in the same manner too, that he belly swelled, and his secret parts rotted: a disease perhaps not much unlike that which in these latter ages the avenging hand of a righteous God has made the scourge of uncleanness, and with which whores and whoremongers infect, and plague, and ruin one another, since they escape punishment from men. The Jewish doctors add that the waters had this effect upon the adulteress only in case the husband had never offended in the same kind; but that, if he had at any time defiled the marriage-bed, God did not thus right him against his injurious wife; and that therefore in the latter and degenerate ages of the Jewish church, when uncleanness did abound, this way of trial was generally disused and laid aside; men, knowing their own crimes, were content not to know their wives' crimes. And to this perhaps may refer the threatening (Hos 4:14), I will not punish your spouses when they commit adultery, for you yourselves are separated with whores. [2.] If she were innocent, the water she drank would be physic to her: She shall be free, and shall conceive seed, Num 5:28. The Jewish writers magnify the good effects of this water to the innocent woman, that, to recompense her for the wrong done to her by the suspicion, she should, after the drinking of these waters, be stronger and look better than ever; if she was sickly, she should become healthful, should bear a man-child, and have easy labour.

2.From the whole we may learn, (1.) That secret sins are known to God, and sometimes are strangely brought to light in this life; however, there is a day coming when God will, by Jesus Christ, as here by the priest, judge the secrets of men according to the gospel, Rom 2:16. (2.) That, in particular, Whoremongers and adulterers God will judge. The violation of conjugal faith and chastity is highly provoking to the God of heaven, and sooner or later it will be reckoned for. Though we have not now the waters of jealousy to be a sensible terror to the unclean, yet we have a word from God which ought to be as great a terror, that if any man defile the temple of God, him shall God destroy, Co1 3:17. (3.) That God will find out some way or other to clear the innocency of the innocent, and to bring forth their righteousness as the light. (4.) That to the pure all things are pure, but to the defiled nothing is so, Tit 1:15. The same word is to some a savour of life unto life, to others a savour of death unto death, like those waters of jealousy, according as they receive it; the same providence is for good to some and for hurt to others, Jer 24:5, Jer 24:8, Jer 24:9. And, whatsoever it is intended for, it shall not return void.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 11–31. Public domain.
Copy as
Richard ChallonerAD 1781
The spirit of jealousy: This ordinance was designed to clear the innocent, and to prevent jealous husbands from doing mischief to their wives: as likewise to give all a horror of adultery, by punishing it in so remarkable a manner.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Numbers 5:14 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.