TRV
Study This Verse
Commentary on Numbers 5 verses 11–31
We have here the law concerning the solemn trial of a wife whose husband was jealous of her. Observe,
I. What was the case supposed: That a man had some reason to suspect his wife to have committed adultery, Num 5:12-14. Here, 1. The sin of adultery is justly represented as an exceedingly sinful sin; it is going aside from God and virtue, and the good way, Pro 2:17. It is committing a trespass against the husband, robbing him of his honour, alienating his right, introducing a spurious breed into his family to share with his children in his estate, and violating her covenant with him. It is being defiled; for nothing pollutes the mind and conscience more than this sin does. 2. It is supposed to be a sin which great care is taken by the sinners to conceal, which there is no witness of. The eye of the adulterer waits for the twilight, Job 24:15. And the adulteress takes her opportunity when the good man is not at home, Pro 7:19. It would not covet to be secret if it were not shameful; and the devil who draws sinners to this sin teaches them how to cover it. 3. The spirit of jealousy is supposed to come upon the husband, of which Solomon says, It is the rage of a man (Pro 6:34), and that it is cruel as the grave, Sol 8:6. 4. "Yet" (say the Jewish writers) "he must make it appear that he has some just cause for the suspicion." The rule they give is, "If the husband have said unto his wife before witnesses, 'Be not thou in secret with such a man;' and, notwithstanding that admonition, it is afterwards proved that she was in secret with that man, though her father or her brother, then he may compel her to drink the bitter water." But the law here does not tie him to that particular method of proving the just cause of his suspicion; it might be otherwise proved. In case it could be proved that she had committed adultery, she was to be put to death (Lev 20:10); but, if it was uncertain, then this law took place. Hence, (1.) Let all wives be admonished not to give any the least occasion for the suspicion of their chastity; it is not enough that they abstain from the evil of uncleanness, but they must abstain from all appearance of it, from every thing that looks like it, or leads to it, or may give the least umbrage to jealousy; for how great a matter may a little fire kindle! (2.) Let all husbands be admonished not to entertain any causeless or unjust suspicions of their wives. If charity in general, much more conjugal affection, teaches to think no evil, Co1 13:5. It is the happiness of the virtuous woman that the heart of her husband does safely trust in her, Pro 31:11.
II. What was the course prescribed in this case, that, if the suspected wife was innocent, she might not continue under the reproach and uneasiness of her husband's jealousy, and, if guilty, her sin might find her out, and others might hear, and fear, and take warning.
1.The process of the trial must be thus: - (1.) Her husband must bring her to the priest, with the witnesses that could prove the ground of his suspicion, and desire that she might be put upon her trial. The Jews say that the priest was first to endeavour to persuade her to confess the truth, saying to this purport, "Dear daughter, perhaps thou wast overtaken by drinking wine, or wast carried away by the heat of youth or the examples of bad neighbours; come, confess the truth, for the sake of his great name which is described in the most sacred ceremony, and do not let it be blotted out with the bitter water." If she confessed, saying, "I am defiled," she was not put to death, but was divorced and lost her dowry; if she said, "I am pure," then they proceeded. (2.) He must bring a coarse offering of barley-meal, without oil or frankincense, agreeably to the present afflicted state of his family; for a great affliction it was either to have cause to be jealous or to be jealous without cause. It is an offering of memorial, to signify that what was to be done was intended as a religious appeal to the omniscience and justice of God. (3.) The priest was to prepare the water of jealousy, the holy water out of the laver at which the priests were to wash when they ministered; this must be brought in an earthen vessel, containing (they say) about a pint; and it must be an earthen vessel, because the coarser and plainer every thing was the more agreeable it was to the occasion. Dust must be put into the water, to signify the reproach she lay under, and the shame she ought to take to herself, putting her mouth in the dust; but dust from the floor of the tabernacle, to put an honour upon every thing that pertained to the place God had chosen to put his name there, and to keep up in the people a reverence for it; see Joh 8:6. (4.) The woman was to be set before the Lord, at the east gate of the temple-court (say the Jews), and her head was to be uncovered, in token of her sorrowful condition; and there she stood for a spectacle to the world, that other women might learn not to do after her lewdness, Eze 23:48. Only the Jews say, "Her own servants were not to be present, that she might not seem vile in their sight, who were to give honour to her; her husband also must be dismissed." (5.) The priest was to adjure her to tell the truth, and to denounce the curse of God against her if she were guilty, and to declare what would be the effect of her drinking the water of jealousy, Num 5:19-22. He must assure her that, if she were innocent, the water would do her no harm, Num 5:19. None need fear the curse of the law if they have not broken the commands of the law. But, if she were guilty, this water would be poison to her, it would make her belly to swell and her thigh to rot, and she should be a curse or abomination among her people, Num 5:21, Num 5:22. To this she must say, Amen, as Israel must do to the curses pronounced on mount Ebal, Deu 27:15-26. Some think the Amen, being doubled, respects both parts of the adjuration, both that which freed her if innocent and that which condemned her if guilty. No woman, if she were guilty, could say Amen to this adjuration, and drink the water upon it, unless she disbelieved the truth of God or defied his justice, and had come to such a pitch of impudence and hard-heartedness in sin as to challenge God Almighty to do his worst, and choose rather to venture upon his curse than to give him glory by making confession; thus has whoredom taken away the heart. (6.) The priest was to write this curse in a scrip or scroll o parchment, verbatim - word for word, as he had expressed it, and then to wipe or scrape out what he had written into the water (Num 5:23), to signify that it was that curse which impregnated the water, and gave it its strength to effect what was intended. It signified that, if she were innocent, the curse should be blotted out and never appear against her, as it is written, Isa 43:25, I am he that blotteth out thy transgression, and Psa 51:9, Blot out my iniquities; but that, if she were guilty, the curse, as it was written, being infused into the water, would enter into her bowels with the water, even like oil into her bones (Psa 109:18), as we read of a curse entering into a house, Zac 5:4. (7.) The woman must then drink the water (Num 5:24); it is called the bitter water, some think because they put wormwood in it to make it bitter, or rather because it caused the curse. Thus sin is called an evil thing and a bitter for the same reason, because it causeth the curse, Jer 2:19. If she had been guilty (and otherwise it did not cause the curse), she was made to know that though her stolen waters had been sweet, and her bread eaten in secret pleasant, yet the end was bitter as wormwood, Pro 9:17, and Pro 5:4. Let all that meddle with forbidden pleasures know that they will be bitterness in the latter end. The Jews say that if, upon denouncing the curse, the woman was so terrified that she durst not drink the water, but confessed she was defiled, the priest flung down the water, and cast her offering among the ashes, and she was divorced without dowry: if she confessed not, and yet would not drink, they forced her to it; and, if she was ready to throw it up again, they hastened her away, that she might not pollute the holy place. (8.) Before she drank the water, the jealousy-offering was waved and offered upon the altar (Num 5:25, Num 5:26); a handful of it was burnt for a memorial, and the remainder of it eaten by the priest, unless the husband was a priest, and then it was scattered among the ashes. This offering in the midst of the transaction signified that the whole was an appeal to God, as a God that knows all things, and from whom no secret is hid. (9.) All things being thus performed according to the law, they were to wait the issue. The water, with a little dust put into it, and the scrapings of a written parchment, had no natural tendency at all to do either good or hurt; but if God was thus appealed to in the way of an instituted ordinance, though otherwise the innocent might have continued under suspicion and the guilty undiscovered, yet God would so far own his own institution as that in a little time, by the miraculous operation of Providence, the innocency of the innocent should be cleared, and the sin of the guilty should find them out. [1.] If the suspected woman was really guilty, the water she drank would be poison to her (Num 5:27), her belly would swell and her thigh rot by a vile disease for vile deserts, and she would mourn at the last when her flesh and body were consumed, Pro 5:11. Bishop Patrick says, from some of the Jewish writers, that the effect of these waters appeared immediately, she grew pale, and her eyes ready to start out of her head. Dr. Lightfoot says that sometimes it appeared not for two or three years, but she bore no children, was sickly, languished, and rotted at last; it is probable that some indications appeared immediately. The rabbin say that the adulterer also died in the same day and hour that the adulteress did, and in the same manner too, that he belly swelled, and his secret parts rotted: a disease perhaps not much unlike that which in these latter ages the avenging hand of a righteous God has made the scourge of uncleanness, and with which whores and whoremongers infect, and plague, and ruin one another, since they escape punishment from men. The Jewish doctors add that the waters had this effect upon the adulteress only in case the husband had never offended in the same kind; but that, if he had at any time defiled the marriage-bed, God did not thus right him against his injurious wife; and that therefore in the latter and degenerate ages of the Jewish church, when uncleanness did abound, this way of trial was generally disused and laid aside; men, knowing their own crimes, were content not to know their wives' crimes. And to this perhaps may refer the threatening (Hos 4:14), I will not punish your spouses when they commit adultery, for you yourselves are separated with whores. [2.] If she were innocent, the water she drank would be physic to her: She shall be free, and shall conceive seed, Num 5:28. The Jewish writers magnify the good effects of this water to the innocent woman, that, to recompense her for the wrong done to her by the suspicion, she should, after the drinking of these waters, be stronger and look better than ever; if she was sickly, she should become healthful, should bear a man-child, and have easy labour.
2.From the whole we may learn, (1.) That secret sins are known to God, and sometimes are strangely brought to light in this life; however, there is a day coming when God will, by Jesus Christ, as here by the priest, judge the secrets of men according to the gospel, Rom 2:16. (2.) That, in particular, Whoremongers and adulterers God will judge. The violation of conjugal faith and chastity is highly provoking to the God of heaven, and sooner or later it will be reckoned for. Though we have not now the waters of jealousy to be a sensible terror to the unclean, yet we have a word from God which ought to be as great a terror, that if any man defile the temple of God, him shall God destroy, Co1 3:17. (3.) That God will find out some way or other to clear the innocency of the innocent, and to bring forth their righteousness as the light. (4.) That to the pure all things are pure, but to the defiled nothing is so, Tit 1:15. The same word is to some a savour of life unto life, to others a savour of death unto death, like those waters of jealousy, according as they receive it; the same providence is for good to some and for hurt to others, Jer 24:5, Jer 24:8, Jer 24:9. And, whatsoever it is intended for, it shall not return void.
Continue studying Numbers 5:13 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
SefariaThe Hebrew text with Rashi and centuries of Jewish commentary.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
SUMMARY
Numbers 5:13 meticulously details the precise conditions that necessitate the "Law of Jealousy" or "Ordeal of the Bitter Water," a unique divine judicial mechanism within the Mosaic Law. This verse describes a scenario where a husband suspects his wife of adultery, but the alleged act is entirely concealed from human observation, with no witnesses or direct evidence to confirm her defilement, thereby creating an impasse that only God's direct intervention can resolve to reveal the truth and uphold justice within the Israelite community.
CONTEXT
Literary Context: Numbers 5:13 functions as the critical trigger for the "Law of Jealousy," comprehensively outlined in Numbers 5:11-31. This specific legal procedure is situated within a broader section of Numbers (chapters 1-10) that establishes the order, purity, and structure of the Israelite camp as they prepare for their journey through the wilderness. Preceding the Law of Jealousy are regulations concerning the removal of unclean persons from the camp (Numbers 5:1-4) and the restitution for wrongs committed, particularly against the Lord (Numbers 5:5-10). This placement underscores the overarching theme of maintaining holiness and moral integrity within God's covenant people. The Law of Jealousy itself is a divine test by ordeal, specifically designed for ambiguous cases of suspected marital infidelity where conventional human legal processes, which typically require two or three witnesses, are insufficient to determine guilt or innocence. Verse 13 precisely articulates these conditions, highlighting the need for extraordinary divine intervention when human justice reaches its limits.
Historical & Cultural Context: In ancient Israelite society, as in the broader ancient Near East, marital fidelity was paramount, serving as the foundational pillar for family structure, lineage integrity, and communal purity. Adultery was not merely a social transgression but a grave sin against God's covenant, often punishable by death under the Mosaic Law (Leviticus 20:10; Deuteronomy 22:22). However, a significant legal and social challenge arose when adultery was suspected but lacked direct evidence or witnesses, leaving a husband in agonizing uncertainty and the community without clear grounds for judgment. In a patriarchal society where a woman's honor, her husband's reputation, and the legitimacy of offspring were critically important, unresolved suspicions could lead to profound domestic strife, social instability, and even wrongful accusations. The "Ordeal of the Bitter Water" provided a unique, divinely sanctioned mechanism to resolve such ambiguous cases, ensuring that justice, whether vindicating the innocent or exposing the guilty, could be rendered by God Himself. This law demonstrates God's meticulous concern for both individual righteousness and the moral well-being of the entire community, even in the most private and hidden aspects of life, thereby upholding the sanctity of marriage and maintaining order within His holy nation.
Key Themes: Numbers 5:13, as the preamble to the Ordeal of the Bitter Water, contributes significantly to several key themes pervasive throughout the book of Numbers and the Pentateuch. Firstly, it powerfully reinforces the theme of Divine Omniscience and Immanence. The law is necessitated precisely because human eyes cannot see the hidden sin, emphasizing that no secret act escapes God's knowledge (Proverbs 15:3). Secondly, it highlights God's unwavering commitment to Justice and Truth. Even when human legal systems are inadequate, God provides a means for truth to be revealed and justice to be served, demonstrating His active governance over His people's moral and social order. This aligns with the broader theme of God as the ultimate Judge, as seen in passages like Genesis 18:25. Thirdly, the passage underscores the Sanctity of Marriage and the Seriousness of Defilement. Adultery is treated not merely as a social breach but as a profound spiritual defilement that renders a person "unclean" and requires divine intervention for resolution, reflecting the high value God places on covenant fidelity. Finally, it speaks to the theme of Purity and Order within the Holy Community, a recurring motif in Numbers, where the camp's physical and moral purity is essential for God's presence among His people (Numbers 5:3).
EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS
Key Word Analysis
Verse Breakdown
Literary Devices
Numbers 5:13 masterfully employs several potent literary devices that amplify its meaning and underscore the gravity of the situation it addresses. Repetition is prominently featured in the dual emphasis on concealment: "hid from the eyes of her husband" and "kept close." This reiteration powerfully highlights the core dilemma—the hidden nature of the suspected sin—and sets the stage for the divine intervention necessary to reveal what is otherwise invisible to human perception. The verse also utilizes precise Legal Language, outlining the specific, stringent conditions that must be met for the ordeal to be invoked ("no witness against her," "neither she be taken with the manner"). This precision underscores the Mosaic Law's meticulous attention to justice and due process, even when human means are exhausted. Furthermore, the entire scenario presents a profound Contrast between human limitation and divine omniscience. Humans are unable to discern the truth due to the hidden nature of the act and the lack of witnesses, but God is presented as the ultimate, all-seeing judge who can penetrate all secrecy. This contrast implicitly Foreshadows the broader biblical theme that "nothing is hidden from God" and that ultimately, all hidden things, whether for judgment or vindication, will be brought to light.
THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS
Numbers 5:13, as the catalyst for the Law of Jealousy, profoundly underscores several core theological truths. Firstly, it highlights God's absolute omniscience; no sin, no matter how carefully hidden from human eyes, remains concealed from Him. This truth serves as a powerful deterrent to secret wrongdoing and a comfort to those who feel wronged without recourse. Secondly, the passage affirms God's unwavering commitment to justice and truth, especially in matters of moral purity and the sanctity of covenants. Even when human legal systems are insufficient, God provides a mechanism to ensure that truth prevails and defilement is addressed. Finally, it emphasizes the profound seriousness with which God views marital fidelity, treating adultery not merely as a social breach but as a spiritual defilement that demands divine attention and resolution, reflecting His holy character and His desire for a pure people.
REFLECTION AND APPLICATION
The stark reality presented in Numbers 5:13—that sin can be hidden from human eyes but never from God—carries profound implications for our lives today. It serves as a potent reminder of God's perfect knowledge and unwavering justice, urging us to live with unwavering integrity, not just in public but in the deepest recesses of our hearts and minds. This passage challenges the modern tendency to compartmentalize life, believing that private actions have no public or spiritual consequence. For believers, it calls for a radical transparency before God, acknowledging that true purity begins inwardly, where thoughts and intentions reside. It also powerfully reinforces the sanctity of marital vows, reminding us that fidelity is a sacred trust, honored not merely out of fear of discovery but out of reverence for God and profound respect for our spouse. When we recognize that God sees all, our motivation for righteousness shifts from external accountability to an internal desire to please Him, fostering a life of genuine holiness, integrity, and trust in His ultimate, all-revealing justice.
Questions for Reflection
FAQ
Why was the "Ordeal of the Bitter Water" necessary if God is omniscient?
Answer: The ordeal was necessary not because God needed a mechanism to discover the truth, for He is omniscient, but because human society did. In ancient Israel, legal verdicts typically required the testimony of witnesses. When a husband suspected his wife of adultery but had no witnesses or direct proof, there was no human legal recourse to resolve the dispute. This ambiguity could lead to ongoing marital strife, false accusations, or unpunished sin, thereby undermining the community's moral and social fabric. The ordeal provided a divinely sanctioned means for God Himself to act as the ultimate judge, revealing the truth—either vindicating the innocent or exposing the guilty—thereby bringing closure and upholding justice where human means failed. It was a concession to human limitation, demonstrating God's meticulous care for order and purity within His people, and serving as a powerful deterrent against secret sin.
Is the Law of Jealousy, including the ordeal, still applicable to believers today?
Answer: No, the specific ritual of the "Ordeal of the Bitter Water" is part of the Old Covenant's ceremonial and judicial law, which has been fulfilled and superseded by the New Covenant in Christ. Believers today are not bound by these specific ritualistic practices. However, the underlying principles remain timeless: God's omniscience, His commitment to truth and justice, the seriousness with which He views sin (especially adultery), and the sanctity of marriage. While the method of resolving suspected infidelity has changed (e.g., through church discipline, legal processes, and personal repentance), the divine standards for purity and fidelity endure. The New Testament church operates under the guidance of the Holy Spirit and the principles of grace and truth revealed in Christ, rather than judicial ordeals, recognizing that Christ's sacrifice provides a perfect cleansing for sin (Hebrews 9:14).
What does "neither she be taken [with the manner]" mean in this verse?
Answer: The phrase "neither she be taken [with the manner]" means that the woman was not caught in the very act of committing adultery. It emphasizes the complete lack of direct, irrefutable evidence. If she had been "taken with the manner," i.e., apprehended during the act, then the standard legal penalties for adultery would have applied, and the ordeal would not have been necessary. This clause highlights that the Law of Jealousy was specifically for cases of suspicion without proof, where the alleged sin was entirely hidden from human observation, necessitating a divine means of revelation.
CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT
Numbers 5:13, with its profound focus on hidden sin and the divine revelation of truth, finds its ultimate fulfillment in the person and work of Jesus Christ. The Law of Jealousy, in its attempt to expose hidden defilement and bring justice where human means failed, points directly to Christ as the one who perfectly embodies and administers divine justice and truth. He is the light that exposes all darkness, revealing the secrets of hearts that are "kept close" from human eyes (John 3:20-21). Unlike the temporary and ritualistic nature of the bitter water ordeal, Christ offers a definitive and eternal solution to the problem of defilement through His atoning sacrifice. His blood cleanses from all sin, both hidden and manifest, providing a true and lasting purity that the Law's rituals could only foreshadow (Hebrews 9:14; 1 John 1:7). Moreover, Jesus upholds the sanctity of marriage not through an ordeal, but through His teaching on its divine institution and indissolubility (Matthew 19:4-6), and He addresses the root of defilement by emphasizing the purity of the heart, where lust and adultery truly begin (Matthew 5:28). In Christ, the need for an external, physical ordeal is superseded by an internal transformation and the perfect, omniscient judgment of God, who has committed all judgment to the Son (John 5:22), ensuring that all truth will ultimately be revealed through Him.