Skip to content

Job 15:16

“The Frailty of Human Wisdom”Job 15:7–16

King James Version
How much more abominable and filthy is man, which drinketh iniquity like water?

Bible text: King James Version (1769 Blayney text) · Public domain

KJV (with Strong's)
How much more abominable H8581 and filthy H444 is man H376, which drinketh H8354 iniquity H5766 H5766 like water H4325?

Bible text: King James Version with Strong's numbers · Public domain

Berean Standard Bible
how much less man, who is vile and corrupt, who drinks injustice like water?

Bible text: Berean Standard Bible · Public domain

American Standard Version
How much less one that is abominable and corrupt, A man that drinketh iniquity like water!

Bible text: American Standard Version (1901) · Public domain

World English Bible Messianic
how much less one who is abominable and corrupt, a man who drinks iniquity like water!

Bible text: World English Bible, Messianic edition · Public domain

Geneva Bible (1599)
How much more is man abominable, and filthie, which drinketh iniquitie like water?

Bible text: Geneva Bible (1599) · Public domain

Young's Literal Translation
Also--surely abominable and filthy Is man drinking as water perverseness.

Bible text: Young's Literal Translation · Public domain

King James Version — Interlinear
8 Hebrew words
  1. אַף'afindeed?H637PrtParticle Interjection
  2. כִּיkiforH3588PrtParticle Conditional
  3. נִתְעָבnit·'Av[one who] is abhorrentH8581V-Niphal-Prtcpl-msVerb Niphal Participle Singular Masculine Absolute
  4. וְנֶאֱלָחve·ne·'e·Lachand [one who] is corruptH444Conj-w ¦ V-Niphal-Prtcpl-msVerb Niphal Participle Singular Masculine Absoluteוְandנֶאֱלָח[one who] is corrupt
  5. אִישׁ'isha personH376N-msNoun Singular Masculine Absolute
  6. שֹׁתֶהsho·Teh[who] drinksH8354V-Qal-Prtcpl-msVerb Qal Participle Singular Masculine Absolute
  7. כַמַּיִםkha·Ma·yimlike [the] waterH4325Prep-k ¦ N-mpNoun Plural Masculine Absoluteכַlike [the]מַּיִםwater
  8. עַוְלָה'av·LahunrighteousnessH5766N-fsNoun Singular Feminine Absolute
English is a literal word-by-word gloss of the Hebrew, not the KJV's wording. Why?

This is the original text the KJV's translators worked from — each Hebrew word with its own literal English meaning in this verse, prepared by scholars at Tyndale House, Cambridge. The KJV translates whole sentences, not word by word, so its wording differs: one Hebrew word can become several English words, and the KJV may choose “the LORD” where the gloss reads “Yahweh”. Both are faithful — they answer different questions. For the KJV's own rendering, switch to the KJV text.

Words in [ ] are added by the English.

Translation
Details
See on the biblical-era map
In the KJVVerse 13,220 of 31,102 · 42.5%

Study this verse

Written with AI assistance. Always check it against Scripture.

This verse

If the heavens are unclean before God, man is far more abominable and filthy, taking in iniquity as freely as a thirsty man drinks water.

“How much more abominable and filthy is man,”

The step from the heavens to man: if they are unclean, man is far worse, detestable and corrupt.

“which drinketh iniquity like water?”

Sin taken in as freely and as often as water. Christ answers that thirst with living water.

Passage studyJob 15:7–16

The Frailty of Human Wisdom

7Art thou the first man that was born? or wast thou made before the hills? 8Hast thou heard the secret of God? and dost thou restrain wisdom to thyself? 9What knowest thou, that we know not? what understandest thou, which is not in us? 10With us are both the grayheaded and very aged men, much elder than thy father. 11Are the consolations of God small with thee? is there any secret thing with thee? 12Why doth thine heart carry thee away? and what do thy eyes wink at, 13That thou turnest thy spirit against God, and lettest such words go out of thy mouth? 14What is man, that he should be clean? and he which is born of a woman, that he should be righteous? 15Behold, he putteth no trust in his saints; yea, the heavens are not clean in his sight. 16How much more abominable and filthy is man, which drinketh iniquity like water?

Summary

In his second speech, Eliphaz the Temanite answers Job with a run of sharp questions. Was Job the first man born, or made before the hills? Has he listened in on the secret counsel of God? What does he know that the friends and their grayheaded elders have missed? Eliphaz then charges Job with making light of God’s comfort, with a heart that carries him away, and with turning his spirit against God. He closes with a picture of man before a holy God: if God puts no trust in his saints and the heavens are unclean in his sight, how much more filthy is man, “which drinketh iniquity like water?”

Much of what Eliphaz says about God’s wisdom and man’s sin is true, and the rest of Scripture says it too. His mistake lies in aiming it at Job as proof of a hidden sin, and God later tells him, “ye have not spoken of me the thing that is right, as my servant Job hath” (Job 42:7). These verses show how far all human wisdom falls below God’s, how deep our need of cleansing runs, and how true words can wound when they are spoken without love.

Who is speaking, and what has gone before

Job 15 is Eliphaz’s second speech, and it opens the second round of the friends’ speeches. His first (Job 4–5) was gentler. Since then he has heard Job’s long reply in Job 12–14, where Job held to his integrity, asked God to show him the cause of his suffering, and in Job 14 lamented the shortness of life and longed for death. Eliphaz has already dismissed Job’s words as windy knowledge and accused him of undermining piety (Job 15:2–6), and now his questions grow sharper.

Eliphaz and his friends hold that God always rewards the righteous with blessing and punishes the wicked with suffering in this life. On that view Job’s losses can only mean a great sin, and when Job keeps protesting his innocence, his complaints look to them like pride and rebellion. The book’s opening chapters (Job 1) tell us that Job’s suffering is a trial whose cause was hidden from Eliphaz. The rest of this speech describes the end of the wicked man, painting Job in those colours, and Job answers him in Job 16.

Was Job the first man that was born?

Eliphaz asks this to mock Job, charging him with talking as though his wisdom reached back to the first day of mankind. “Art thou the first man that was born? or wast thou made before the hills?” Both questions expect the answer no, and they work by deliberate exaggeration. The word for man, ʼâdâm, is the ordinary word for a human being or for mankind, and “the first man” points back to Adam, whom God formed of the dust of the ground (Genesis 2:7). The verb yâlad, in the form used here, means “be born”. Job came into the world by birth like everyone else, so his knowledge, like ours, began when his life began.

Made before the hills

The second question reaches further back than the first man, to the making of the earth itself. The word gibʻâh means a hill. In Scripture the hills and mountains stand for great age and lasting stability, so to be “made before the hills” would be to have been present when God formed the world. Wisdom speaks in just these terms in the passage where she describes being with God at creation: “Before the mountains were settled, before the hills was I brought forth” (Proverbs 8:22–31). Eliphaz means that only someone who stood beside God at the beginning could speak with the authority Job is taking.

God himself later puts questions of the same kind to Job: “Where wast thou when I laid the foundations of the earth?” (Job 38:4–7). What Eliphaz says in scorn, God says in truth, and when the LORD speaks out of the whirlwind (Job 38), it is to humble Job before his majesty while at the same time vindicating him against his friends.

People ask whether Eliphaz is accusing Job of claiming to be God. He is charging Job with acting as if he had God’s own wisdom, enough to sit in judgment on God’s ways, and the next verse makes that plain when he asks whether Job has heard the secret of God. The charge is pride, and Eliphaz lays it at the wrong door. The truth beneath his words still stands: God’s wisdom is eternal, and ours is as young as we are. “God resisteth the proud, but giveth grace unto the humble” (James 4:6).

Has Job heard the secret of God?

With this question Eliphaz accuses Job of speaking as though he had been admitted to God’s private council. The word for “secret”, çôwd (also written sod), means a council or company of people deliberating closely together, and the counsel they share. It comes from yâçad, to set or found, and in its reflexive sense to sit down together and consult. Scripture pictures the LORD in his heavenly council. Micaiah said, “I saw the LORD sitting on his throne, and all the host of heaven standing by him on his right hand and on his left” (1 Kings 22:19), and Jeremiah asks, “For who hath stood in the counsel of the LORD, and hath perceived and heard his word?” (Jeremiah 23:18). To claim a hearing in that council is to claim a place that belongs to God’s own servants of his choosing.

The word for God in this verse is ʼĕlôwahh, a singular noun meaning God (or, of other nations, a god), which Strong’s calls probably a lengthened form of ʼêl.

“Dost thou restrain wisdom to thyself?” The verb gâraʻ comes from a root meaning to scrape off, to diminish or to withhold, and here it means to keep something back for oneself. Eliphaz pictures Job hoarding wisdom, as though truth were his alone and the wisdom of the elders counted for little. Bildad had already urged Job to ask of the former age and learn from the fathers (Job 8:8–10).

The irony is plain. Eliphaz accuses Job of claiming to know God’s secrets, and in the same breath he presumes to know why Job is suffering, which was exactly the thing God had kept hidden from all of them. Some things God keeps to himself: “The secret things belong unto the LORD our God: but those things which are revealed belong unto us and to our children for ever” (Deuteronomy 29:29). Isaiah asks, “Who hath directed the Spirit of the LORD, or being his counsellor hath taught him?” (Isaiah 40:13–14), and Paul breaks into praise: “O the depth of the riches both of the wisdom and knowledge of God! how unsearchable are his judgments, and his ways past finding out!” (Romans 11:33–36). Job, for his part, longed to find God and lay his case before him (Job 23:3–5), the cry of a man who knew he lacked the answer.

What knowest thou, that we know not?

Eliphaz now sets the friends’ knowledge beside Job’s and finds Job’s wanting. He uses two verbs. Yâdaʻ is the common verb to know, and it covers knowledge gained by experience and close acquaintance. Bîyn means to understand or discern, to tell things apart and make sense of them. The second line says the first again in other words, as Hebrew poetry often does, and the repetition presses the point home: whatever Job knows, they knew first. With it Eliphaz waves away Job’s experience, his questions and his claim of innocence.

The end of the book shows how partial their understanding was, and how much Job, for all his struggles, came to see of God’s majesty. God’s ways stand far above every human scheme: “For my thoughts are not your thoughts, neither are your ways my ways, saith the LORD” (Isaiah 55:8–9). Proverbs gives the right posture: “Trust in the LORD with all thine heart; and lean not unto thine own understanding” (Proverbs 3:5–6), for “the LORD giveth wisdom: out of his mouth cometh knowledge and understanding” (Proverbs 2:6). Paul says that “the foolishness of God is wiser than men” (1 Corinthians 1:20–25).

Eliphaz came to comfort a grieving friend and stayed to judge him. Scripture asks something gentler of us: “weep with them that weep” (Romans 12:15).

Do gray hairs settle the argument?

Eliphaz leans on the honour Scripture gives to age, and uses it to silence Job. “With us are both the grayheaded and very aged men, much elder than thy father.” Sîyb, grayheaded, comes from a root meaning to become aged and describes hair turned gray or white. Yâshîysh means an old man, one who is very old. “Much elder” is built from kabbîyr, much, and yôwm, day, so these men are older by many days. The comparison with Job’s father, ʼâb, makes Job a younger man by a whole generation, and in a culture that honoured parents and elders that was meant to end the debate. Eliphaz, himself an elder, may count himself among these men.

Scripture does honour age. The law says, “Thou shalt rise up before the hoary head, and honour the face of the old man” (Leviticus 19:32). Proverbs calls gray hair a glory: “The hoary head is a crown of glory, if it be found in the way of righteousness” (Proverbs 16:31), and “the beauty of old men is the grey head” (Proverbs 20:29). The condition in the first of those proverbs matters. Later in this very book the young man Elihu answers the friends: “Great men are not always wise: neither do the aged understand judgment” (Job 32:9). Wisdom comes from God and begins with fearing him: “Behold, the fear of the Lord, that is wisdom; and to depart from evil is understanding” (Job 28:28), and “The fear of the LORD is the beginning of wisdom” (Proverbs 9:10). That fear can be found at any age, and it is the counsel of the old that carries it which deserves our honour.

The consolations of God and the secret thing

“Are the consolations of God small with thee?” The word tanchûwm comes from nâcham and means compassion, solace and comfort. The name of God here is ʼêl, which means God and is also given the sense of strength and might. Eliphaz means that God has offered Job comfort and Job treats it as a small thing. He most likely counts the friends’ own counsel among God’s consolations, and perhaps the discipline of suffering itself, which he expects to bring Job to repentance.

There is a sad irony in this. Eliphaz speaks of God’s comfort while handing Job accusation. The comfort God truly gives comes from his own heart: he is “the Father of mercies, and the God of all comfort; who comforteth us in all our tribulation” (2 Corinthians 1:3–4). The psalmist says, “In the multitude of my thoughts within me thy comforts delight my soul” (Psalm 94:19), and in the valley of the shadow of death, “thy rod and thy staff they comfort me” (Psalm 23:4). God’s comfort reaches into suffering and works through it, as tribulation works patience, experience and hope (Romans 5:3–5), and the God of all grace, after his people “have suffered a while”, will “make you perfect, stablish, strengthen, settle you” (1 Peter 5:10).

“Is there any secret thing with thee?” The word behind “secret”, ʼaṭ, comes from a root that may mean to move softly. Elsewhere it is used as an adverb, gently or softly, and once for necromancers, named for their soft muttering. In the KJV’s reading the line speaks of something kept hidden, and in Eliphaz’s mouth it hints at a concealed sin. His reasoning is simple: Job suffers greatly, and he denies any open wrongdoing, so the sin must be a secret one. Job’s answer runs through the whole dialogue: “My righteousness I hold fast, and will not let it go” (Job 27:6).

A heart carried away and eyes that wink

“Why doth thine heart carry thee away? and what do thy eyes wink at,” Eliphaz now turns from Job’s words to Job’s inner life. The heart, lêb (also written lev), is the whole inner person in Hebrew: thought, will, conscience and choice as well as feeling. The verb lâqach means to take, seize or carry away, so Eliphaz pictures Job’s heart sweeping him off, overcome by pride or bitterness. The verb râzam means to wink or to flash, of the eyes, and Eliphaz reads the look in Job’s eyes as contempt for the friends’ counsel and defiance toward God. Proverbs describes the wicked man in similar terms: “He winketh with his eyes” (Proverbs 6:12–13).

Scripture does teach that the heart drives everything else: “Keep thy heart with all diligence; for out of it are the issues of life” (Proverbs 4:23), and Jesus says that what comes out of the mouth comes from the heart (Matthew 15:18–19). Eliphaz has explained suffering by a man’s own doings since his first speech, where he said that “man is born unto trouble, as the sparks fly upward” (Job 5:7).

People ask whether Eliphaz had any ground at all for this charge. Job was wrestling hard, and some of his words were bold, as when he said, “Surely I would speak to the Almighty, and I desire to reason with God” (Job 13:3). What Eliphaz got wrong was the cause. He read anguish and a longing to be vindicated as pride, and God’s verdict at the end shows whose reading was right (Job 42:7). Only God sees the depths of a human heart.

That thou turnest thy spirit against God

Verse 12 ends with a comma in the KJV and runs straight into this charge: “That thou turnest thy spirit against God, and lettest such words go out of thy mouth?” The verb shûwb means to turn back or return, and it is also used of things that pass or subside, so the word itself leaves the question of purpose open. Eliphaz uses it to say that Job has set his spirit against God. Rûwach means wind, breath or spirit, and here it is Job’s inner disposition, his attitude toward God.

“Such words” are all Job’s laments and arguments. The word millâh means a word, or collectively a discourse, or a topic, and comes from mâlal, to speak. “Lettest … go out” is yâtsâʼ, to go or come out, and “mouth” is peh. Eliphaz sees an inner rebellion and the words that pour out of it.

He has forgotten how Job first met his losses: “In all this Job sinned not, nor charged God foolishly” (Job 1:22). And when his wife urged him to curse God, “In all this did not Job sin with his lips” (Job 2:10). Words do matter greatly, for “Death and life are in the power of the tongue” (Proverbs 18:21), but Eliphaz has mistaken a broken spirit for a rebellious one.

Is it wrong to question God when we suffer?

Scripture gives God’s people room to pour out their pain and confusion before him. The psalms of lament do exactly that: “How long wilt thou forget me, O LORD? for ever? how long wilt thou hide thy face from me?” (Psalm 13:1–6), and the cry of Psalm 22 opens with the words “My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me?” God affirmed Job at the end of the book, bold words and all. The line falls between lament that brings its complaint to God and goes on trusting him, and defiance that wants to throw off his rule. Eliphaz could only see the second.

Jesus himself cried on the cross, “My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me?” (Matthew 27:46), taking up the words of Psalm 22:1. That cry was full of anguish and free of rebellion, as his prayer in the garden had been: “nevertheless not my will, but thine, be done” (Luke 22:42).

What is man, that he should be clean?

Eliphaz asks this to say that every human being falls short of the purity God requires. “What is man, that he should be clean? and he which is born of a woman, that he should be righteous?” The word for man here, ʼĕnôwsh, is a noun meaning man, men, mortal or people. “Born of a woman” is a common biblical way of speaking of the human condition, with its mortality and frailty, shared by everyone who has ever been born.

Zâkâh, to be clean, means to be translucent, and figuratively to be innocent. It covers both ritual purity, being fit to come before God in worship, and moral blamelessness. Tsâdaq, to be righteous, means to be right in a moral or legal sense, to be just, upright or in right standing. The two lines ask the same question from two sides: can a mortal be pure, and can he be in the right before God?

Here Eliphaz says what the rest of Scripture says. “They are all gone aside, they are all together become filthy: there is none that doeth good, no, not one” (Psalm 14:3). Paul quotes the same truth: “There is none righteous, no, not one” (Romans 3:10–12), and he sums it up, “For all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God” (Romans 3:23). “By one man sin entered into the world” (Romans 5:12), and every child of Adam shares it. So the cleansing we need must come from God: “For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God: Not of works, lest any man should boast” (Ephesians 2:8–9).

Even the heavens are unclean in his sight

“Behold, he putteth no trust in his saints; yea, the heavens are not clean in his sight.” Eliphaz means that God measures even his holy ones by his own purity, and by that measure their holiness is something they have received from him. The verb ʼâman is the word behind trusting and believing, and in its simplest form it means to support or foster. Here it speaks of what God relies on, and he relies on nothing in creation as though it were pure in itself.

The word for saints, qâdôwsh, means holy, sacred, set apart. “Clean” in this verse translates zâkak, to be transparent or clean, free of stain, which is a different Hebrew word from the zâkâh of verse 14 though the KJV gives both the English “clean”. The heavens were to Israel the highest and brightest part of creation, yet before God’s eye, ʻayin, “in his sight”, they fall short of his purity. Isaiah heard the cry, “Holy, holy, holy, is the LORD of hosts: the whole earth is full of his glory” (Isaiah 6:3).

Who are the saints in this verse?

The saints here are heavenly beings, the angels. Eliphaz said the same thing in his first speech in almost the same words: “Behold, he put no trust in his servants; and his angels he charged with folly” (Job 4:18). Setting the two verses side by side shows that “his saints” and “his angels” are the same company. People ask whether this means God doubts his angels’ loyalty. The verse is about purity: God’s holiness is his own, and theirs is given to them, so beside him even the highest creatures are seen to be creatures.

How much more abominable is man?

“How much more abominable and filthy is man, which drinketh iniquity like water?” Here the argument of verse 15 lands. If the holy angels and the heavens fall short of God’s purity, how much further does man fall? Tāʿēḇ, abominable, means to loathe or detest, and it describes what is abhorrent. Its family of words runs through Leviticus and Deuteronomy for practices God abhors, such as idolatry, sexual perversion and dishonest dealing. ʼÂlach, filthy, means to muddle, and so to become morally corrupt, foul and tainted.

The verb shâthâh means to drink, literally or in a figure. To drink iniquity like water is to take in sin as readily and as often as a thirsty man drinks, with as little thought as he gives to a cup of water. Eliphaz puts it as strongly as language allows, and the picture is of an appetite. The Bible says the same of the heart: “The heart is deceitful above all things, and desperately wicked: who can know it?” (Jeremiah 17:9). Psalm 14:3, quoted above, uses the English word “filthy” for the whole race as well. The story runs back to the fall in Genesis 3, and Romans 3 declares that all have sinned.

Jesus turns the picture of thirst the other way: “Blessed are they which do hunger and thirst after righteousness: for they shall be filled” (Matthew 5:6).

True words aimed at the wrong man

Eliphaz was right about man and wrong about Job. What he says in verses 14 to 16 agrees with the whole Bible: all have sinned, and no one can make himself clean before God. His error lay in the use he made of it. He turned a truth about every human being into proof that Job’s suffering must be the punishment of some particular, hidden sin, and he presumed to know the reason for a trial God had kept to himself. God’s verdict on the friends at the end of the book (Job 42:7) shows that sound doctrine, aimed in the wrong direction and spoken without compassion, can misrepresent God and wound the person it was meant to help.

Christ, the wisdom of God who makes us clean

Every claim Eliphaz denies to Job is true of Jesus Christ. Eliphaz asks scornfully whether Job was made before the hills. Of the Son John says, “In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God,” and “All things were made by him” (John 1:1–3). The Son was before the hills because he made them. He is also the last Adam, head of a new humanity: “The first man Adam was made a living soul; the last Adam was made a quickening spirit” (1 Corinthians 15:45). Paul calls him “the power of God, and the wisdom of God” (1 Corinthians 1:24), the wisdom that Proverbs pictures beside God at creation, and he says that in Christ “are hid all the treasures of wisdom and knowledge” (Colossians 2:3).

Eliphaz mocks the idea that Job has heard the secret of God. In Christ the secret has been opened. Paul speaks of “the mystery of God, and of the Father, and of Christ” (Colossians 2:2), and Jesus says, “neither knoweth any man the Father, save the Son, and he to whomsoever the Son will reveal him” (Matthew 11:27). The Son is “the brightness of his glory, and the express image of his person” (Hebrews 1:3), and he “of God is made unto us wisdom” (1 Corinthians 1:30). The wisdom Eliphaz accuses Job of hoarding, God gives freely in Christ: “If any of you lack wisdom, let him ask of God, that giveth to all men liberally” (James 1:5).

Eliphaz appealed to gray hairs, and when Jesus taught, the people found that “he taught them as one having authority, and not as the scribes” (Matthew 7:29). Eliphaz claimed to understand suffering from a distance. Christ understands it from within, as “a man of sorrows, and acquainted with grief” (Isaiah 53:3), and he brings the consolations of God in his own person: “Surely he hath borne our griefs, and carried our sorrows” (Isaiah 53:4). Nothing hidden can part those who trust in him from the love of God (Romans 8:38–39).

Eliphaz charged Job with a heart carried away and eyes full of scorn. Jesus’ heart was wholly given to his Father’s will: “For I came down from heaven, not to do mine own will, but the will of him that sent me” (John 6:38). His eyes looked on the crowds with pity: “when he saw the multitudes, he was moved with compassion on them” (Matthew 9:36), and with holy zeal when he drove the traders out of his Father’s house (John 2:15–16). Yet he too was misjudged and accused, and the high priest cried, “He hath spoken blasphemy” (Matthew 26:65–66). He “did no sin, neither was guile found in his mouth” (1 Peter 2:22).

Eliphaz asks how one born of a woman could be clean. Christ is the one man “made of a woman” (Galatians 4:4) who was tempted in all points as we are, “yet without sin” (Hebrews 4:15). He is “the Lamb of God, which taketh away the sin of the world” (John 1:29), and “he hath made him to be sin for us, who knew no sin; that we might be made the righteousness of God in him” (2 Corinthians 5:21). To the one who believes, God counts faith for righteousness (Romans 4:5), and he presents his people “holy and unblameable and unreproveable in his sight” (Colossians 1:22), the very sight before which Eliphaz said the heavens are unclean. Man drinks iniquity like water, and Christ offers living water in its place (John 4:10): “If any man thirst, let him come unto me, and drink” (John 7:37–38).

Wisdom from above and comfort that heals

These verses set our wisdom in its place. We were born yesterday and made long after the hills, and God’s counsel belongs to him. The friends’ failure shows that age, tradition and sound doctrine all fall short when they are used to explain away another person’s pain. The wisdom that pleases God begins in the fear of the LORD and stays humble before what he has kept hidden.

The verses also tell the truth about us. Every one of us is born of a woman, and none of us can make himself clean. Eliphaz used that truth as a weapon, and God uses it to bring us to Christ, in whom the unclean are washed and made righteous in his sight.

And they show us God’s own comfort, which is far greater than the friends’ consolations. He hears the lament of a suffering servant, he vindicated Job, and in his Son he has come close to every sorrow. When we sit beside someone who is suffering, the gentlest thing we can bring is that same patience and love.

Last revised

Public-domain commentary

Matthew Henry

From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry wrote on whole passages, and this entry covers Job 15:1–16. He set out his notes in a three-level outline, kept here as he numbered it.

1662–1714 · 16 verses
Passage under commentJob 15:1–16
I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points(1.) (2.) Details

Eliphaz here falls very foul upon Job, because he contradicted what he and his colleagues had said, and did not acquiesce in it and applaud it, as they expected. Proud people are apt thus to take it very much amiss if they may not have leave to dictate and give law to all about them, and to censure those as ignorant and obstinate, and all that is naught, who cannot in every thing say as they say. Several great crimes Eliphaz here charges Job with, only because he would not own himself a hypocrite.

I.He charges him with folly and absurdity (Job 15:2, Job 15:3), that, whereas he had been reputed a wise man, he had now quite forfeited his reputation; any one would say that his wisdom had departed from him, he talked so extravagantly and so little to the purpose. Bildad began thus (Job 8:2), and Zophar, Job 11:2, Job 11:3. It is common for angry disputants thus to represent one another's reasonings as impertinent and ridiculous more than there is cause, forgetting the doom of him that calls his brother Raca, and Thou fool. It is true,

1.That there is in the world a great deal of vain knowledge, science falsely so called, that is useless, and therefore worthless.

2.That this is the knowledge that puffs up, with which men swell in a fond conceit of their own accomplishments.

3.That, whatever vain knowledge a man may have in his head, if he would be thought a wise man he must not utter it, but let it die with himself as it deserves.

4.Unprofitable talk is evil talk. We must give an account in the great day not only for wicked words, but for idle words. Speeches therefore which do no good, which do no service either to God or our neighbour, or no justice to ourselves, which are no way to the use of edifying, were better unspoken. Those words which are as wind, light and empty, especially which are as the east wind, hurtful and pernicious, it will be pernicious to fill either ourselves or others with, for they will pass very ill in the account.

5.Vain knowledge or unprofitable talk ought to be reproved and checked, especially in a wise man, whom it worst becomes and who does most hurt by the bad example of it.

II.He charges him with impiety and irreligion (Job 15:4):

"Thou castest off fear," that is, "the fear of God, and that regard to him which thou shouldst have; and then thou restrainest prayer." See what religion is summed up in, fearing God and praying to him, the former the most needful principle, the latter the most needful practice. Where no fear of God is no good is to be expected; and those who live without prayer certainly live without God in the world. Those who restrain prayer do thereby give evidence that they cast off fear. Surely those have no reverence of God's majesty, no dread of his wrath, and are in no care about their souls and eternity, who make no applications to God for his grace. Those who are prayerless are fearless and graceless. When the fear of God is cast off all sin is let in and a door opened to all manner of profaneness. It is especially bad with those who have had some fear of God, but have now cast it off - have been frequent in prayer, but now restrain it. How have they fallen! How is their first love lost! It denotes a kind of force put upon themselves. The fear of God would cleave to them, but they throw it off; prayer would be uttered, but they restrain it; and, in both, they baffle their convictions. Those who either omit prayer or straiten and abridge themselves in it, quenching the spirit of adoption and denying themselves the liberty they might take in the duty, restrain prayer. This is bad enough, but it is worse to restrain others from prayer, to prohibit and discourage prayer, as Darius, Daniel 6:7. Now,

1.Eliphaz charges this upon Job, either,

(1.)As that which was his own practice. He thought that Job talked of God with such liberty as if he had been his equal, and that he charged him so vehemently with hard usage of him, and challenged him so often to a fair trial, that he had quite thrown off all religious regard to him. This charge was utterly false, and yet wanted not some colour. We ought not only to take care that we keep up prayer and the fear of God, but that we never drop any unwary expressions which may give occasion to those who seek occasion to question our sincerity and constancy in religion. Or,

(2.)As that which others would infer from the doctrine he maintained. "If this be true" (thinks Eliphaz) "which Job says, that a man may be thus sorely afflicted and yet be a good man, then farewell all religion, farewell prayer and the fear of God. If all things come alike to all, and the best men may have the worst treatment in this world, every one will be ready to say, It is vain to serve God; and what profit is it to keep his ordinances? Malachi 3:14. Verily I have cleansed my hands in vain, Psalm 73:13, Psalm 73:14. Who will be honest if the tabernacles of robbers prosper? Job 12:6. If there be no forgiveness with God (Job 7:21), who will fear him? Psalm 130:4. If he laugh at the trial of the innocent (Job 9:23), if he be so difficult of access (Job 9:32), who will pray to him?" Note, It is a piece of injustice which even wise and good men are too often guilty of, in the heat of disputation, to charge upon their adversaries those consequences of their opinions which are not fairly drawn from them and which really they abhor. This is not doing as we would be done by.

2.Upon this strained innuendo Eliphaz grounds that high charge of impiety (Job 15:5): Thy mouth utters thy iniquity - teaches it, so the word is. "Thou teachest others to have the same hard thoughts of God and religion that thou thyself hast." It is bad to break even the least of the commandments, but worse to teach men so, Matthew 5:19. If we ever thought evil, let us lay our hand upon our mouth to suppress the evil thought (Proverbs 30:32), and let us by no means utter it; that is putting an imprimatur to it, publishing it with allowance, to the dishonour of God and the damage of others. Observe, When men have cast off fear and prayer their mouths utter iniquity. Those that cease to do good soon learn to do evil. What can we expect but all manner of iniquity from those that arm not themselves with the grace of God against it? But thou choosest the tongue of the crafty, that is, "Thou utterest thy iniquity with some show and pretence of piety, mixing some good words with the bad, as tradesmen do with their wares to help them off." The mouth of iniquity could not do so much mischief as it does without the tongue of the crafty. The serpent beguiled Eve through his subtlety. See Romans 16:18. The tongue of the crafty speaks with design and deliberation; and therefore those that use it may be said to choose it, as that which will serve their purpose better than the tongue of the upright: but it will be found, at last, that honesty is the best policy. Eliphaz, in his first discourse, had proceeded against Job upon mere surmise (Job 4:6, Job 4:7), but now he has got proof against him from his own discourses (Job 15:6): Thy own mouth condemns thee, and not I. But he should have considered that he and his fellows had provoked him to say that which now they took advantage of; and that was not fair. Those are most effectually condemned that are condemned by themselves, Titus 3:11; Luke 19:22. Many a man needs no more to sink him than for his own tongue to fall upon him.

III.He charges him with intolerable arrogancy and self-conceitedness.

It was a just, and reasonable, and modest demand that Job had made (Job 12:3), Allow that I have understanding as well as you; but see how they seek occasion against him: that is misconstrued, as if he pretended to be wiser than any man. Because he will not grant to them the monopoly of wisdom, they will have it thought that he claims it to himself, Job 15:7-9. As if he thought he had the advantage of all mankind,

1.In length of acquaintance with the world, which furnishes men with so much the more experience: "Art thou the first man that was born; and, consequently, senior to us, and better able to give the sense of antiquity and the judgment of the first and earliest, the wisest and purest, ages? Art thou prior to Adam?" So it may be read. "Did not he suffer for sin; and yet wilt not thou, who art so great a sufferer, own thyself a sinner? Wast thou made before the hills, as Wisdom herself was? Proverbs 8:23, etc. Must God's counsels, which are as the great mountains (Psalm 36:6), and immovable as the everlasting hills, be subject to thy notions and bow to them? Dost thou know more of the world than any of us do? No, thou art but of yesterday even as we are," Job 8:9. Or,

2.In intimacy of acquaintance with God (Job 15:8): "Hast thou heard the secret of God? Dost thou pretend to be of the cabinet-council of heaven, that thou canst give better reasons than others can for God's proceedings?" There are secret things of God, which belong not to us, and which therefore we must not pretend to account for. Those are daringly presumptuous who do. He also represents him,

(1.)As assuming to himself such knowledge as none else had: "Dost thou restrain wisdom to thyself, as if none were wise besides?" Job had said (Job 13:2), What you know, the same do I know also; and now they return upon him, according to the usage of eager disputants, who think they have a privilege to commend themselves: What knowest thou that we know not? How natural are such replies as these in the heat of argument! But how simple do they look afterwards, upon the review!

(2.)As opposing the stream of antiquity, a venerable name, under the shade of which all contending parties strive to shelter themselves: "With us are the gray-headed and very aged men, Job 15:10. We have the fathers on our side; all the ancient doctors of the church are of our opinion." A thing soon said, but not so soon proved; and, when proved, truth is not so soon discovered and proved by it as most people imagine. David preferred right scripture-knowledge before that of antiquity (Psalm 119:100): I understand more than the ancients, because I keep thy precepts. Or perhaps one or more, if not all three, of these friends of Job, were older than he (Job 32:6), and therefore they thought he was bound to acknowledge them to be in the right. This also serves contenders to make a noise with to very little purpose. If they are older than their adversaries, and can say they knew such a thing before their opponents were born, this will not serve to justify them in being arrogant and overbearing; for the oldest are not always the wisest, Job 32:9.

IV.He charges him with a contempt of the counsels and comforts that were given him by his friends (Job 15:11): Are the consolations of God small with thee?

1.Eliphaz takes it ill that Job did not value the comforts which he and his friends administered to him more than it seems he did, and did not welcome every word they said as true and important. It is true they had said some very good things, but, in their application to Job, they were miserable comforters. Note, We are apt to think that great and considerable which we ourselves say, when others perhaps with good reason think it small and trifling. Paul found that those who seemed to be somewhat, yet, in conference, added nothing to him, Galatians 2:6.

2.He represents this as a slight put upon divine consolations in general, as if they were of small account with him, whereas really they were not. If he had not highly valued them, he could not have borne up as he did under his sufferings. Note,

(1.)The consolations of God are not in themselves small. Divine comforts are great things, that is, the comfort which is from God, especially the comfort which is in God.

(2.)The consolations of God not being small in themselves, it is very lamentable if they be small with us. It is a great affront to God, and an evidence of a degenerate depraved mind, to disesteem and undervalue spiritual delights and despise the pleasant land. "What!" (says Eliphaz) "is there any secret thing with thee? Hast thou some cordial to support thyself with, that is a proprium, an arcanum, that nobody else can pretend to, or knows any thing of?" Or, "Is there some secret sin harboured and indulged in thy bosom, which hinders the operation of divine comforts?" None disesteem divine comforts but those that secretly affect the world and the flesh.

V.He charges him with opposition to God himself and to religion (Job 15:12, Job 15:13):

"Why doth thy heart carry thee away into such indecent irreligious expressions?" Note, Every man is tempted when he is drawn away of his own lust, James 1:14. if we fly off from God and our duty, or fly out into anything amiss, it is our own heart that carries us away. If thou scornest, thou alone shalt bear it. There is a violence, an ungovernable impetus, in the turnings of the soul; the corrupt heart carries men away, as it were, by force, against their convictions. "What is it that thy eyes wink at? Why so careless and mindless of what is said to thee, hearing it as if thou wert half asleep? Why so scornful, disdaining what we say, as if it were below thee to take notice of it? What have we said that deserves to be thus slighted - nay, that thou turnest thy spirit against God?" It was bad that his heart was carried away from God, but much worse that it was turned against God. But those that forsake God will soon break out in open enmity to him. But how did this appear? Why, "Thou lettest such words go out of thy mouth, reflecting on God, and his justice and goodness." It is the character of the wicked that they set their mouth against the heavens (Psalm 73:9), which is a certain indication that the spirit is turned against God. He thought Job's spirit was soured against God, and so turned from what it had been, and exasperated at his dealings with him. Eliphaz wanted candour and charity, else he would not have put such a harsh construction upon the speeches of one that had such a settled reputation for piety and was now in temptation. This was, in effect, to give the cause on Satan's side, and to own that Job had done as Satan said he would, had cursed God to his face.

VI.He charges him with justifying himself to such a degree as even to deny his share in the common corruption and pollution of the human nature (Job 15:14): What is man, that he should be clean? that is, that he should pretend to be so, or that any should expect to find him so. What is he that is born of a woman, a sinful woman, that he should be righteous? Note,

1.Righteousness is cleanness; it makes us acceptable to God and easy to ourselves, Psalm 18:24.

2.Man, in his fallen state, cannot pretend to be clean and righteous before God, either to acquit himself to God's justice or recommend himself to his favour.

3.He is to be adjudged unclean and unrighteous because born of a woman, from whom he derives a corrupt nature, which is both his guilt and his pollution. With these plain truths Eliphaz thinks to convince Job, whereas he had just now said the same (Job 14:4): Who can bring a clean thing out of an unclean? But does it therefore follow that Job is a hypocrite, and a wicked man, which is all that he denied? By no means. Though man, as born of a woman, is not clean, yet, as born again of the Spirit, he is clean.

4.Further to evince this he here shows,

(1.)That the brightest creatures are imperfect and impure before God, Job 15:15. God places no confidence in saints and angels; he employs both, but trusts neither with his service, without giving them fresh supplies of strength and wisdom for it, as knowing they are not sufficient of themselves, neither more nor better than his grace makes them. He takes no complacency in the heavens themselves. How pure soever they seem to us, in his eye they have many a speck and many a flaw: The heavens are not clean in his sight. If the stars (says Mr. Caryl) have no light in the sight of the sun, what light has the sun in the sight of God! See Isaiah 24:23.

(2.)That man is much more so (Job 15:16): How much more abominable and filthy is man! If saints are not to be trusted, much less sinners. If the heavens are not pure, which are as God made them, much less man, who is degenerated. Nay, he is abominable and filthy in the sight of God, and if ever he repent he is so in his own sight, and therefore he abhors himself. Sin is an odious thing, it makes men hateful. The body of sin is so, and is therefore called a dead body, a loathsome thing. Is it not a filthy thing, and enough to make any one sick, to see a man eating swine's food or drinking some nauseous and offensive stuff? Such is the filthiness of man that he drinks iniquity (that abominable thing which the Lord hates) as greedily, and with as much pleasure, as a man drinks water when he is thirsty. It is his constant drink; it is natural to sinners to commit iniquity. It gratifies, but does not satisfy, the appetites of the old man. It is like water to a man in a dropsy. The more men sin the more they would sin.

Historical interpretation

Three Centuries of Reception

3 surviving comments on this verse. Each one is dated, so this reads as a timeline rather than a list.

3 quotes · AD 600–850
Post-NiceneEarly Medieval
600700800

Select a marker to jump to its quote. Markers stagger vertically where authors wrote within a few decades of each other.

d. AD 600Olympiodorus of AlexandriaPost-NiceneSourceCOMMENTARY ON JOB 15:14-16
“Who is the person,” Eliphaz asks, “who can be blameless or can proclaim, I am righteous?” If, in fact, those who are very holy, both men and angels, and the purity itself of heaven before the judgment of the most pure God appear to be unclean, what should we say about the damnable and impure human being who drinks iniquity like a draught? He has said this because humans commit sin deliberately. The words “as he does not trust his saints” may also be interpreted in this manner, since the angels themselves can become different in their nature, and actually some of them slipped away from their own former position. Heaven is not pure because of this, and it is also often obscured by clouds.
d. AD 604Gregory the DialogistEarly Medieval
39. He who first said it was impossible that man should of himself be clean from sin, and righteous, calls him ‘abominable’ and ‘useless;’ ‘abominable’ on account of the uncleanness of his stain, but ‘useless’ on account of the unrighteousness of an imperfect life; who however may be understood as ‘abominable and useless’ in another sense. For often a bad man seems to do some things rightly, but by those things which are wrong, even those which are right belonging to him are brought to nought; and because the evil ones are very displeasing to God, neither are those pleasing which seem to be good. And so he, that is ‘abominable’ before God in his evil things, is ‘useless’ in the good; in that whilst he shows himself an object of execration to God by wicked deeds, neither is that which seems right proceeding from him well-pleasing. And it is well said, Which drinketh iniquity like water. For what is eaten is swallowed not without delay, seeing that it is chewed in order to be swallowed; but what is drunk has no hindrance to be swallowed, in proportion as it hath again no need to be chewed. And so because sin is committed by the foolish man without any drawing back, iniquity is drunk like water. For because he does unlawful things without fear, he swallows the draught of iniquity without let or hindrance.
d. AD 850Ishodad of MervEarly MedievalSourceCOMMENTARY ON JOB 15:16
“He will drink iniquity like water.” The author says these words in order to show that [human beings] enjoy uttering blasphemies.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.

Continue studying Job 15:16 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.

Related study articles8