Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
Behold, he putteth no trust in his saints; yea, the heavens are not clean in his sight.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
Behold, he putteth no trust H539 in his saints H6918; yea, the heavens H8064 are not clean H2141 in his sight H5869.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
God doesn't trust even his holy ones; no, even the heavens are not innocent in his view.
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
If God puts no trust in His holy ones, if even the heavens are not pure in His eyes,
Ask
American Standard Version
Behold, he putteth no trust in his holy ones; Yea, the heavens are not clean in his sight:
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
Behold, he puts no trust in his holy ones. Yes, the heavens are not clean in his sight;
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
Beholde, he founde no stedfastnesse in his Saintes: yea, the heauens are not cleane in his sight.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
Lo, in His holy ones He putteth no credence, And the heavens have not been pure in His eyes.
Ask
See on the biblical-era map
In the KJVVerse 13,219 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

Job 15:15, a pronouncement from Eliphaz the Temanite, asserts God's absolute and transcendent holiness by declaring that He places no inherent reliance or confidence in the intrinsic purity of His "saints"—understood as celestial beings or angels—and that even the vast, seemingly pristine heavens are not perfectly pure in His sight. This profound statement underscores the infinite chasm between the Creator's flawless perfection and the relative imperfection of all created things, thereby establishing an impossibly high standard against which all beings, especially humanity, inevitably fall short.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: This verse is situated within Eliphaz's second discourse to Job, forming a critical part of Job 15. Following Job's fervent expressions of despair and his continued assertion of innocence in Job 14, Eliphaz responds with increased severity, reiterating his core theological premise: suffering is a direct consequence of sin. Eliphaz's argument in Job 15:15 functions to humble Job by emphasizing God's transcendent purity and the inherent imperfection of all creation, thereby implicitly accusing Job of unconfessed sin. This echoes and intensifies his earlier assertion in Job 4:18, where he similarly claimed God "putteth no trust in his servants; and his angels he charged with folly." The current statement extends this idea to the very heavens, broadening the scope of creation's imperfection.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: The book of Job is a masterpiece of ancient Near Eastern wisdom literature, which often grappled with the complexities of divine justice and human suffering. The prevailing theological framework among Job's friends, including Eliphaz, was retribution theology—the belief that God unfailingly rewards the righteous and punishes the wicked. Their understanding of God's character, while acknowledging His omnipotence and holiness, was constrained by this rigid framework, leading them to misinterpret Job's blameless suffering. The reference to "saints" (celestial beings) and "heavens" reflects ancient cosmological views where the celestial realm and its inhabitants were considered exalted and powerful, yet still subordinate to the supreme deity. The disputational format is characteristic of wisdom traditions, serving as a vehicle to explore profound existential and theological questions about God's nature, human righteousness, and the problem of evil.
  • Key Themes: Job 15:15 significantly contributes to several overarching themes within the book of Job and broader biblical theology. Firstly, it powerfully asserts God's absolute holiness and transcendence, highlighting His infinite purity and His distinct separation from all creation, even the most exalted beings. Secondly, it underscores the inherent imperfection of all creation, suggesting that nothing, not even celestial beings or the physical heavens, can meet God's flawless standard of purity. This theme is crucial for understanding the universal frailty and sinfulness of humanity by extension. While Eliphaz misapplies this truth to Job's specific circumstances, the underlying theological principle of God's unblemished purity and the universal need for grace is profoundly biblical, laying foundational groundwork for later revelations concerning redemption and righteousness through divine intervention, as seen in passages like Romans 3, which declares all have sinned and fall short of God's glory.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • trust (Hebrew, ʼâman', H539): This primitive root signifies to build up or support, to be firm or faithful, and figuratively, to trust or believe. In this context, when Eliphaz states God "putteth no trust" in His saints, it does not imply a lack of confidence in their loyalty or obedience. Rather, it conveys that God does not rely on their inherent purity or intrinsic faithfulness as a standard of righteousness, because His own purity is absolute and unapproachable. Their holiness is derived and relative, not intrinsic and absolute like God's.
  • saints (Hebrew, qâdôwsh', H6918): Derived from a root meaning "to be sacred," this term denotes something set apart as holy, ceremonially or morally. In the context of Job, particularly when paralleled with Job 4:18, it refers to celestial beings or angels. These are beings set apart for God's service and are holy by divine appointment, yet even these exalted creatures are not inherently pure enough to meet God's absolute, uncreated standard.
  • clean (Hebrew, zâkak', H2141): This root signifies to be transparent or clean, physically or morally. It implies absolute purity, brightness, and freedom from blemish, stain, or guilt. The use of this term emphasizes the stark contrast between God's flawless, unblemished nature and the relative impurity of everything else in creation, even the seemingly pristine heavens. It speaks to an unadulterated perfection that only God possesses.

Verse Breakdown

  • "Behold, he putteth no trust in his saints": This opening clause introduces Eliphaz's argument by asserting God's absolute self-sufficiency and His non-reliance on the inherent purity or righteousness of even His highest created beings. The "saints" here are best understood as angels or heavenly hosts, who, despite their exalted status and holiness, are still finite and created. Their holiness is a reflection of God's, not an intrinsic, unblemished quality that God could "trust" in as a source of ultimate purity. This highlights God's unique, incomparable perfection and His sovereign independence from all creation.
  • "yea, the heavens are not clean in his sight": This second clause functions as a parallel intensification of the first, employing a rhetorical "how much more" argument. If even the "heavens"—often seen as the epitome of purity, vastness, and majesty in ancient cosmology, representing the highest and most pristine part of creation—are considered "not clean" (i.e., imperfect, stained, or relatively impure) when viewed by God's absolute standard, then what hope is there for any other created thing, especially frail humanity? The phrase "in his sight" (Hebrew, ʻayin') emphasizes God's penetrating, all-seeing gaze that discerns even the slightest imperfection.

Literary Devices

Eliphaz masterfully employs several literary devices to underscore his point about God's absolute purity and creation's inherent imperfection. The most prominent is Hyperbole, as he exaggerates the imperfection of even the heavens and angels to emphasize God's absolute, incomparable purity. This overstatement serves to humble Job and reinforce Eliphaz's argument about universal sinfulness. There is also clear Synthetic Parallelism between the two clauses: "he putteth no trust in his saints" and "yea, the heavens are not clean in his sight." Both phrases convey the same core idea of universal imperfection relative to God's holiness, with the second clause intensifying and expanding upon the first. Finally, Anthropomorphism is present in the idea of God "putting trust" or having things "in his sight," which attributes human-like actions or perceptions to God to make His transcendent nature more comprehensible, albeit still conveying a profound theological truth about His absolute standards and discerning gaze.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

Job 15:15, despite being spoken by a character whose application of theology is flawed in the broader narrative, conveys a profound and enduring truth about God's nature: His absolute, unapproachable holiness and the inherent imperfection of all creation. This verse serves as a stark reminder that no created being, no matter how exalted or seemingly pure, can stand perfectly righteous before the infinitely holy God. This theological reality sets the stage for understanding the universal need for divine grace and a righteousness that comes from outside of ourselves, as human efforts to attain purity will always fall short of God's perfect standard. It underscores the vast chasm between the Creator and creation, highlighting the necessity of a divine intervention to bridge this gap and provide a means for reconciliation.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

Job 15:15 calls us to profound humility and a deep appreciation for the unblemished holiness of God. It challenges any notion of self-righteousness or the idea that our good deeds, spiritual disciplines, or moral efforts could ever make us truly "clean" in God's sight. If even the most exalted heavenly beings and the vast heavens themselves are deemed imperfect by God's absolute standard, how much more are we, frail humanity, inherently flawed and stained by sin, in desperate need of His grace? This verse should lead us not to despair, but to a deeper understanding of our utter dependence on God's mercy and His sovereign provision for our cleansing. It highlights that salvation is not about what we achieve or earn, but about what God, in His infinite love and justice, has done for us. Recognizing our inherent uncleanness before God's perfect standard should cultivate a spirit of profound gratitude for the divine solution to our sin problem, fostering a posture of humble reliance on Him alone.

Questions for Reflection

  • How does understanding God's absolute holiness, as described in this verse, impact my view of myself and my own perceived righteousness?
  • In what ways might I be tempted to trust in my own "goodness" or spiritual achievements rather than solely in God's transformative grace?
  • How does the concept of even "the heavens" being unclean in God's sight deepen my appreciation for the perfection of Christ and the complete cleansing He offers?

FAQ

Who are the "saints" referred to in this verse?

Answer: In the context of Job 15:15, the term "saints" (Hebrew qâdôwsh) most likely refers to celestial beings or angels, rather than righteous human beings. This interpretation is strongly supported by Eliphaz's own words in an earlier speech, Job 4:18, where he states, "Behold, he put no trust in his servants; and his angels he charged with folly." The parallelism suggests that "saints" in Job 15:15 are synonymous with "angels" or other heavenly beings. The core point is that even these exalted, holy creatures are not pure enough to meet God's absolute standard of perfection.

Does this verse mean God doesn't trust His angels at all?

Answer: No, it does not mean God lacks trust in His angels' loyalty or their ability to faithfully carry out His commands. Rather, the "trust" (Hebrew ʼâman') here refers to God's reliance on their inherent purity or righteousness as a standard for Himself. The verse emphasizes that God's own holiness is so absolute and unblemished that no created being, not even the most exalted angels, possesses an intrinsic purity that God would need to "trust" in or rely upon as a benchmark. Their holiness is derived from God, not inherent in themselves. Therefore, when compared to God's infinite perfection, even the purest created beings are deemed "not clean" or relatively imperfect in His discerning sight.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

Job 15:15, though spoken by Eliphaz with a flawed application to Job's suffering, powerfully sets the stage for the absolute necessity of Christ. If even the "saints" (angels) and the very "heavens" are not clean in God's sight, then humanity, inherently fallen and sinful, is utterly incapable of achieving righteousness or purity on its own. This verse highlights the profound problem of sin and the insurmountable barrier between a holy God and an unclean creation. The solution to this universal dilemma is found uniquely and perfectly in Jesus Christ. He is the only one who truly stood perfectly "clean" and without blemish before God, the spotless Lamb of God, who takes away the sin of the world!. Through His perfect life of obedience, His atoning death on the cross, and His glorious resurrection, Christ provides the righteousness that we utterly lack. His perfect purity is imputed to us, making us "clean" in God's sight, not by our own merit or effort, but by His grace alone, as 2 Corinthians 5:21 profoundly declares: "For he hath made him to be sin for us, who knew no sin; that we might be made the righteousness of God in him." He is the ultimate fulfillment of the need for a perfect cleanser, making us holy and blameless before God, as promised in Colossians 1:22, presenting us "holy and unblameable and unreproveable in his sight."

Copy as

Commentary on Job 15 verses 1–16

I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points

Eliphaz here falls very foul upon Job, because he contradicted what he and his colleagues had said, and did not acquiesce in it and applaud it, as they expected. Proud people are apt thus to take it very much amiss if they may not have leave to dictate and give law to all about them, and to censure those as ignorant and obstinate, and all that is naught, who cannot in every thing say as they say. Several great crimes Eliphaz here charges Job with, only because he would not own himself a hypocrite.

I. He charges him with folly and absurdity (Job 15:2, Job 15:3), that, whereas he had been reputed a wise man, he had now quite forfeited his reputation; any one would say that his wisdom had departed from him, he talked so extravagantly and so little to the purpose. Bildad began thus (Job 8:2), and Zophar, Job 11:2, Job 11:3. It is common for angry disputants thus to represent one another's reasonings as impertinent and ridiculous more than there is cause, forgetting the doom of him that calls his brother Raca, and Thou fool. It is true, 1. That there is in the world a great deal of vain knowledge, science falsely so called, that is useless, and therefore worthless. 2. That this is the knowledge that puffs up, with which men swell in a fond conceit of their own accomplishments. 3. That, whatever vain knowledge a man may have in his head, if he would be thought a wise man he must not utter it, but let it die with himself as it deserves. 4. Unprofitable talk is evil talk. We must give an account in the great day not only for wicked words, but for idle words. Speeches therefore which do no good, which do no service either to God or our neighbour, or no justice to ourselves, which are no way to the use of edifying, were better unspoken. Those words which are as wind, light and empty, especially which are as the east wind, hurtful and pernicious, it will be pernicious to fill either ourselves or others with, for they will pass very ill in the account. 5. Vain knowledge or unprofitable talk ought to be reproved and checked, especially in a wise man, whom it worst becomes and who does most hurt by the bad example of it.

II. He charges him with impiety and irreligion (Job 15:4): "Thou castest off fear," that is, "the fear of God, and that regard to him which thou shouldst have; and then thou restrainest prayer." See what religion is summed up in, fearing God and praying to him, the former the most needful principle, the latter the most needful practice. Where no fear of God is no good is to be expected; and those who live without prayer certainly live without God in the world. Those who restrain prayer do thereby give evidence that they cast off fear. Surely those have no reverence of God's majesty, no dread of his wrath, and are in no care about their souls and eternity, who make no applications to God for his grace. Those who are prayerless are fearless and graceless. When the fear of God is cast off all sin is let in and a door opened to all manner of profaneness. It is especially bad with those who have had some fear of God, but have now cast it off - have been frequent in prayer, but now restrain it. How have they fallen! How is their first love lost! It denotes a kind of force put upon themselves. The fear of God would cleave to them, but they throw it off; prayer would be uttered, but they restrain it; and, in both, they baffle their convictions. Those who either omit prayer or straiten and abridge themselves in it, quenching the spirit of adoption and denying themselves the liberty they might take in the duty, restrain prayer. This is bad enough, but it is worse to restrain others from prayer, to prohibit and discourage prayer, as Darius, Dan 6:7. Now,

1.Eliphaz charges this upon Job, either, (1.) As that which was his own practice. He thought that Job talked of God with such liberty as if he had been his equal, and that he charged him so vehemently with hard usage of him, and challenged him so often to a fair trial, that he had quite thrown off all religious regard to him. This charge was utterly false, and yet wanted not some colour. We ought not only to take care that we keep up prayer and the fear of God, but that we never drop any unwary expressions which may give occasion to those who seek occasion to question our sincerity and constancy in religion. Or, (2.) As that which others would infer from the doctrine he maintained. "If this be true" (thinks Eliphaz) "which Job says, that a man may be thus sorely afflicted and yet be a good man, then farewell all religion, farewell prayer and the fear of God. If all things come alike to all, and the best men may have the worst treatment in this world, every one will be ready to say, It is vain to serve God; and what profit is it to keep his ordinances? Mal 3:14. Verily I have cleansed my hands in vain, Psa 73:13, Psa 73:14. Who will be honest if the tabernacles of robbers prosper? Job 12:6. If there be no forgiveness with God (Job 7:21), who will fear him? Psa 130:4. If he laugh at the trial of the innocent (Job 9:23), if he be so difficult of access (Job 9:32), who will pray to him?" Note, It is a piece of injustice which even wise and good men are too often guilty of, in the heat of disputation, to charge upon their adversaries those consequences of their opinions which are not fairly drawn from them and which really they abhor. This is not doing as we would be done by.

2.Upon this strained innuendo Eliphaz grounds that high charge of impiety (Job 15:5): Thy mouth utters thy iniquity - teaches it, so the word is. "Thou teachest others to have the same hard thoughts of God and religion that thou thyself hast." It is bad to break even the least of the commandments, but worse to teach men so, Mat 5:19. If we ever thought evil, let us lay our hand upon our mouth to suppress the evil thought (Pro 30:32), and let us by no means utter it; that is putting an imprimatur to it, publishing it with allowance, to the dishonour of God and the damage of others. Observe, When men have cast off fear and prayer their mouths utter iniquity. Those that cease to do good soon learn to do evil. What can we expect but all manner of iniquity from those that arm not themselves with the grace of God against it? But thou choosest the tongue of the crafty, that is, "Thou utterest thy iniquity with some show and pretence of piety, mixing some good words with the bad, as tradesmen do with their wares to help them off." The mouth of iniquity could not do so much mischief as it does without the tongue of the crafty. The serpent beguiled Eve through his subtlety. See Rom 16:18. The tongue of the crafty speaks with design and deliberation; and therefore those that use it may be said to choose it, as that which will serve their purpose better than the tongue of the upright: but it will be found, at last, that honesty is the best policy. Eliphaz, in his first discourse, had proceeded against Job upon mere surmise (Job 4:6, Job 4:7), but now he has got proof against him from his own discourses (Job 15:6): Thy own mouth condemns thee, and not I. But he should have considered that he and his fellows had provoked him to say that which now they took advantage of; and that was not fair. Those are most effectually condemned that are condemned by themselves, Tit 3:11; Luk 19:22. Many a man needs no more to sink him than for his own tongue to fall upon him.

III. He charges him with intolerable arrogancy and self-conceitedness. It was a just, and reasonable, and modest demand that Job had made (Job 12:3), Allow that I have understanding as well as you; but see how they seek occasion against him: that is misconstrued, as if he pretended to be wiser than any man. Because he will not grant to them the monopoly of wisdom, they will have it thought that he claims it to himself, Job 15:7-9. As if he thought he had the advantage of all mankind, 1. In length of acquaintance with the world, which furnishes men with so much the more experience: "Art thou the first man that was born; and, consequently, senior to us, and better able to give the sense of antiquity and the judgment of the first and earliest, the wisest and purest, ages? Art thou prior to Adam?" So it may be read. "Did not he suffer for sin; and yet wilt not thou, who art so great a sufferer, own thyself a sinner? Wast thou made before the hills, as Wisdom herself was? Pro 8:23, etc. Must God's counsels, which are as the great mountains (Psa 36:6), and immovable as the everlasting hills, be subject to thy notions and bow to them? Dost thou know more of the world than any of us do? No, thou art but of yesterday even as we are," Job 8:9. Or, 2. In intimacy of acquaintance with God (Job 15:8): "Hast thou heard the secret of God? Dost thou pretend to be of the cabinet-council of heaven, that thou canst give better reasons than others can for God's proceedings?" There are secret things of God, which belong not to us, and which therefore we must not pretend to account for. Those are daringly presumptuous who do. He also represents him, (1.) As assuming to himself such knowledge as none else had: "Dost thou restrain wisdom to thyself, as if none were wise besides?" Job had said (Job 13:2), What you know, the same do I know also; and now they return upon him, according to the usage of eager disputants, who think they have a privilege to commend themselves: What knowest thou that we know not? How natural are such replies as these in the heat of argument! But how simple do they look afterwards, upon the review! (2.) As opposing the stream of antiquity, a venerable name, under the shade of which all contending parties strive to shelter themselves: "With us are the gray-headed and very aged men, Job 15:10. We have the fathers on our side; all the ancient doctors of the church are of our opinion." A thing soon said, but not so soon proved; and, when proved, truth is not so soon discovered and proved by it as most people imagine. David preferred right scripture-knowledge before that of antiquity (Psa 119:100): I understand more than the ancients, because I keep thy precepts. Or perhaps one or more, if not all three, of these friends of Job, were older than he (Job 32:6), and therefore they thought he was bound to acknowledge them to be in the right. This also serves contenders to make a noise with to very little purpose. If they are older than their adversaries, and can say they knew such a thing before their opponents were born, this will not serve to justify them in being arrogant and overbearing; for the oldest are not always the wisest, Job 32:9.

IV. He charges him with a contempt of the counsels and comforts that were given him by his friends (Job 15:11): Are the consolations of God small with thee? 1. Eliphaz takes it ill that Job did not value the comforts which he and his friends administered to him more than it seems he did, and did not welcome every word they said as true and important. It is true they had said some very good things, but, in their application to Job, they were miserable comforters. Note, We are apt to think that great and considerable which we ourselves say, when others perhaps with good reason think it small and trifling. Paul found that those who seemed to be somewhat, yet, in conference, added nothing to him, Gal 2:6. 2. He represents this as a slight put upon divine consolations in general, as if they were of small account with him, whereas really they were not. If he had not highly valued them, he could not have borne up as he did under his sufferings. Note, (1.) The consolations of God are not in themselves small. Divine comforts are great things, that is, the comfort which is from God, especially the comfort which is in God. (2.) The consolations of God not being small in themselves, it is very lamentable if they be small with us. It is a great affront to God, and an evidence of a degenerate depraved mind, to disesteem and undervalue spiritual delights and despise the pleasant land. "What!" (says Eliphaz) "is there any secret thing with thee? Hast thou some cordial to support thyself with, that is a proprium, an arcanum, that nobody else can pretend to, or knows any thing of?" Or, "Is there some secret sin harboured and indulged in thy bosom, which hinders the operation of divine comforts?" None disesteem divine comforts but those that secretly affect the world and the flesh.

V. He charges him with opposition to God himself and to religion (Job 15:12, Job 15:13): "Why doth thy heart carry thee away into such indecent irreligious expressions?" Note, Every man is tempted when he is drawn away of his own lust, Jam 1:14. if we fly off from God and our duty, or fly out into anything amiss, it is our own heart that carries us away. If thou scornest, thou alone shalt bear it. There is a violence, an ungovernable impetus, in the turnings of the soul; the corrupt heart carries men away, as it were, by force, against their convictions. "What is it that thy eyes wink at? Why so careless and mindless of what is said to thee, hearing it as if thou wert half asleep? Why so scornful, disdaining what we say, as if it were below thee to take notice of it? What have we said that deserves to be thus slighted - nay, that thou turnest thy spirit against God?" It was bad that his heart was carried away from God, but much worse that it was turned against God. But those that forsake God will soon break out in open enmity to him. But how did this appear? Why, "Thou lettest such words go out of thy mouth, reflecting on God, and his justice and goodness." It is the character of the wicked that they set their mouth against the heavens (Psa 73:9), which is a certain indication that the spirit is turned against God. He thought Job's spirit was soured against God, and so turned from what it had been, and exasperated at his dealings with him. Eliphaz wanted candour and charity, else he would not have put such a harsh construction upon the speeches of one that had such a settled reputation for piety and was now in temptation. This was, in effect, to give the cause on Satan's side, and to own that Job had done as Satan said he would, had cursed God to his face.

VI. He charges him with justifying himself to such a degree as even to deny his share in the common corruption and pollution of the human nature (Job 15:14): What is man, that he should be clean? that is, that he should pretend to be so, or that any should expect to find him so. What is he that is born of a woman, a sinful woman, that he should be righteous? Note, 1. Righteousness is cleanness; it makes us acceptable to God and easy to ourselves, Psa 18:24. 2. Man, in his fallen state, cannot pretend to be clean and righteous before God, either to acquit himself to God's justice or recommend himself to his favour. 3. He is to be adjudged unclean and unrighteous because born of a woman, from whom he derives a corrupt nature, which is both his guilt and his pollution. With these plain truths Eliphaz thinks to convince Job, whereas he had just now said the same (Job 14:4): Who can bring a clean thing out of an unclean? But does it therefore follow that Job is a hypocrite, and a wicked man, which is all that he denied? By no means. Though man, as born of a woman, is not clean, yet, as born again of the Spirit, he is clean. 4. Further to evince this he here shows, (1.) That the brightest creatures are imperfect and impure before God, Job 15:15. God places no confidence in saints and angels; he employs both, but trusts neither with his service, without giving them fresh supplies of strength and wisdom for it, as knowing they are not sufficient of themselves, neither more nor better than his grace makes them. He takes no complacency in the heavens themselves. How pure soever they seem to us, in his eye they have many a speck and many a flaw: The heavens are not clean in his sight. If the stars (says Mr. Caryl) have no light in the sight of the sun, what light has the sun in the sight of God! See Isa 24:23. (2.) That man is much more so (Job 15:16): How much more abominable and filthy is man! If saints are not to be trusted, much less sinners. If the heavens are not pure, which are as God made them, much less man, who is degenerated. Nay, he is abominable and filthy in the sight of God, and if ever he repent he is so in his own sight, and therefore he abhors himself. Sin is an odious thing, it makes men hateful. The body of sin is so, and is therefore called a dead body, a loathsome thing. Is it not a filthy thing, and enough to make any one sick, to see a man eating swine's food or drinking some nauseous and offensive stuff? Such is the filthiness of man that he drinks iniquity (that abominable thing which the Lord hates) as greedily, and with as much pleasure, as a man drinks water when he is thirsty. It is his constant drink; it is natural to sinners to commit iniquity. It gratifies, but does not satisfy, the appetites of the old man. It is like water to a man in a dropsy. The more men sin the more they would sin.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 1–16. Public domain.
Copy as
Olympiodorus of AlexandriaAD 600
COMMENTARY ON JOB 15:14-16
“Who is the person,” Eliphaz asks, “who can be blameless or can proclaim, I am righteous?” If, in fact, those who are very holy, both men and angels, and the purity itself of heaven before the judgment of the most pure God appear to be unclean, what should we say about the damnable and impure human being who drinks iniquity like a draught? He has said this because humans commit sin deliberately. The words “as he does not trust his saints” may also be interpreted in this manner, since the angels themselves can become different in their nature, and actually some of them slipped away from their own former position. Heaven is not pure because of this, and it is also often obscured by clouds.
Gregory the DialogistAD 604
38. He repeated that with the title of ‘the heavens,’ which he before denoted by the appellation of the ‘Saints.’ For it is written concerning those very Saints; The heavens are telling the glory of God [Ps. 19, 1]; all of whom have by nature in themselves changeableness proper to them, but while they earnestly desire to attach themselves always to the unchangeable ‘Truth,’ in attaching themselves they bring it to pass that they become unchangeable; and whilst they keep themselves fixed thereto with a full affection, they one day obtain that being carried above themselves, they get the better of this, that in themselves they were changeable. For what is changeableness but a kind of death? which while it changes one thing into another, as it were kills that which was, that that should begin to be which was not. And it is written concerning the Author of all things, Who only hath unchangeableness [1 Tim. 6, 16], in that He only is unchangeable in Himself. Concerning whom it is written by James; With Whom is no variableness, neither shadow of changing [Jam. 1, 17]. For changeableness itself is a shadow, which if it altered the light by any changes, would as it were obscure it. But because in God changeableness entereth not, ‘no shadow of changing’ intercepts His Light. Now it is well said, the heavens are not clean in His sight, in that by themselves before the strict cognizance of God not even they can be clean to perfection, who are preachers of cleanness, as John testifies, who saith, If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves. [1 John 1, 8] If then ‘among His Saints there is no one unchangeable, and the heavens are not clean in His sight,’ who may presume in himself upon the practice of righteousness?
Ishodad of MervAD 850
COMMENTARY ON JOB 15:16
“He will drink iniquity like water.” The author says these words in order to show that [human beings] enjoy uttering blasphemies.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Job 15:15 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.