TRV
Study This Verse
Public-domain commentary
Matthew Henry
From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry comments on passages, not single verses — this entry covers Deuteronomy 24:5–13. His two-level outline is real structure in the source text, so it is rendered as structure.
Here is, I. Provision made for the preservation and confirmation of love between new-married people, Deu 24:5. This fitly follows upon the laws concerning divorce, which would be prevented if their affection to each other were well settled at first. If the husband were much abroad from his wife the first year, his love to her would be in danger of cooling, and of being drawn aside to others whom he would meet with abroad; therefore his service to his country in war, embassies, or other public business that would call him from home, shall be dispensed with, that he may cheer up the wife that he has taken. Note, 1. It is of great consequence that love be kept up between husband and wife, and that every thing be very carefully avoided which might make them strange one to another, especially at first; for in that relation, where there is not the love that should be, there is an inlet ready to abundance of guilt and grief. 2. One of the duties of that relation is to cheer up one another under the cares and crosses that happen, as helpers of each other's joy; for a cheerful heart does good like a medicine.
II.A law against man-stealing, Deu 24:7.
It was not death by the law of Moses to steal cattle or goods; but to steal a child, or a weak and simple man, or one that a man had in his power, and to make merchandize of him, this was a capital crime, and could not be expiated, as other thefts, by restitution - so much is a man better than a sheep, Mat 12:12. It was a very heinous offence, for,
1.It was robbing the public of one of its members.
2.It was taking away a man's liberty, the liberty of a free-born Israelite, which was next in value to his life.
3.It was driving a man out from the inheritance of the land, to the privileges of which he was entitled, and bidding him go serve other gods, as David complains against Saul, Sa1 26:19.
III.A memorandum concerning the leprosy, Deu 24:8, Deu 24:9.
1.The laws concerning it must be carefully observed. The laws concerning it we had, Lev 13:14. They are here said to be commanded to the priests and Levites, and therefore are not repeated in a discourse to the people; but the people are here charged, in case of leprosy, to apply to the priest according to the law, and to abide by his judgment, so far as it agreed with the law and the plain matter of fact. The plague of leprosy being usually a particular mark of God's displeasure for sin, he in whom the signs of it did appear ought not to conceal it, nor cut out the signs of it, nor apply to the physician for relief; but he must go to the priest, and follow his directions. Thus those that feel their consciences under guilt and wrath must not cover it, nor endeavour to shake off their convictions, but by repentance, and prayer, and humble confession, take the appointed way to peace and pardon.
2.The particular case of Miriam, who was smitten with leprosy for quarrelling with Moses, must not be forgotten. It was an explication of the law concerning the leprosy. Remember that, and, (1.) "Take heed of sinning after the similitude of her transgression, by despising dominions and speaking evil of dignities, lest you thereby bring upon yourselves the same judgment." (2.) "If any of you be smitten with a leprosy, expect not that the law should be dispensed with, nor think it hard to be shut out of the camp and so made a spectacle; there is no remedy: Miriam herself, though a prophetess and the sister of Moses, was not exempted, but was forced to submit to this severe discipline when she was under this divine rebuke." Thus David, Hezekiah, Peter, and other great men, when they had sinned, humbled themselves, and took to themselves shame and grief; let us not expect to be reconciled upon easier terms.
IV.Some necessary orders given about pledges for the security of money lent.
They are not forbidden to take such securities as would save the lender from loss, and oblige the borrower to be honest; but,
1.They must not take the millstone for a pledge (Deu 24:6), for with that they ground the corn that was to be bread for their families, or, if it were a public mill, with it the miller got his livelihood; and so it forbids the taking of any thing for a pledge by the want of which a man was in danger of being undone. Consonant to this is the ancient common law of England, which provides that no man be distrained of the utensils or instruments of his trade or profession, as the axe of a carpenter, or the books of a scholar, or beasts belonging to the plough, as long as there are other beasts of which distress may be made (Coke, 1 Inst. fol. 47). This teaches us to consult the comfort and subsistence of others as much as our own advantage. That creditor who cares not though his debtor and his family starve, nor is at all concerned what become of them, so he may but get his money or secure it, goes contrary, not only to the law of Christ, but even to the law of Moses too.
2.They must not go into the borrower's house to fetch the pledge, but must stand without, and he must bring it, Deu 24:10, Deu 24:11. The borrower (says Solomon) is servant to the lender; therefore lest the lender should abuse the advantage he has against him, and improve it for his own interest, it is provided that he shall take not what he pleases, but what the borrower can best spare. A man's house is his castle, even the poor man's house is so, and is here taken under the protection of the law.
3.That a poor man's bed-clothes should never be taken for a pledge, Deu 24:12, Deu 24:13. This we had before, Exo 22:26, Exo 22:27. If they were taken in the morning, they must be brought back again at night, which is in effect to say that they must not be taken at all. "Let the poor debtor sleep in his own raiment, and bless thee," that is, "pray for thee, and praise God for thy kindness to him." Note, Poor debtors ought to be sensible (more sensible than commonly they are) of the goodness of those creditors that do not take all the advantage of the law against them, and to repay their kindnesses by their prayers for them, when they are not in a capacity to repay it in any other way. "Nay, thou shalt not only have the prayers and good wishes of thy poor brother, but it shall be righteousness to thee before the Lord thy God," that is, "It shall be accepted and rewarded as an act of mercy to thy brother and obedience to thy God, and an evidence of thy sincere conformity to the law. Though it may be looked upon by men as an act of weakness to deliver up the securities thou hast for thy debt, yet it shall be looked upon by thy God as an act of goodness, which shall in no wise lose its reward."
Continue studying Deuteronomy 24:10 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
SefariaThe Hebrew text with Rashi and centuries of Jewish commentary.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
Summary
Deuteronomy 24:10 presents a specific legal instruction within the Deuteronomic Code, prohibiting a lender from entering a borrower's house to collect a pledge. This command underscores the divine imperative for compassion and justice in financial dealings, particularly concerning the vulnerable. It safeguards the borrower's dignity, privacy, and the sanctity of their home, ensuring that even in matters of debt, the manner of collection reflects God's character and the communal ethos of mutual respect among Israelites.
Context
Literary Context
Deuteronomy 24:10 is situated within a broader section of the Deuteronomic Code (chapters 23-25) that outlines a diverse array of social, ethical, and humanitarian laws governing the daily life of the Israelite community. These laws are presented as expressions of God's covenant relationship with Israel, designed to distinguish them from surrounding nations by fostering a society rooted in justice, mercy, and holiness. Specifically, this verse belongs to a cluster of regulations concerning lending and pledges, which include prohibitions against taking a millstone as a pledge (a vital tool for daily sustenance, as seen in Deuteronomy 24:6) and the requirement to return a poor person's garment pledge by sunset (a life-sustaining necessity, as detailed in Deuteronomy 24:12-13 and Exodus 22:26-27). These interconnected statutes collectively aim to protect the most vulnerable members of society—the poor, the sojourner, the widow, and the orphan—from exploitation and maintain communal harmony and dignity. The immediate verses following this one continue to emphasize the protection of the vulnerable, particularly regarding wages and the treatment of the needy.
Historical & Cultural Context
In the ancient Near East, lending and the taking of pledges (collateral) were common economic practices. However, these often led to abuses of power by creditors, with the poor frequently falling into debt servitude or being subjected to harsh collection methods. Israelite law, as revealed in Deuteronomy, stands in stark contrast to many contemporary legal codes by prioritizing the well-being and dignity of the debtor over the absolute rights of the creditor. The "house" (Hebrew: בַּיִת, bayith) in ancient Israel was more than just a dwelling; it was a private sanctuary, a symbol of personal security, family life, and honor. Uninvited entry, especially by a creditor for the purpose of seizing goods, would have been a profound invasion of privacy, a public humiliation, and a potential source of conflict. The law ensures that even when a pledge is due, the collection process respects the borrower's personal space and preserves their honor within the community, reflecting a unique divine concern for human dignity.
Key Themes
This verse powerfully contributes to several overarching themes in Deuteronomy. Firstly, it emphasizes Respect for Privacy and Dignity, highlighting the sanctity of an individual's home and personal space, even when they are in a vulnerable financial position. The prohibition against intrusive entry ensures that the borrower's honor is maintained. Secondly, it underscores Compassion and Justice as foundational principles of Israelite society. God's law actively intervenes to mitigate the potential for oppression inherent in power imbalances, commanding a merciful approach to those in debt. This aligns with the broader Deuteronomic call for Israel to reflect God's character of righteousness and care for the needy, as seen in laws concerning the poor (e.g., Deuteronomy 15:7-11) and the stranger (e.g., Deuteronomy 10:18-19). Thirdly, it promotes Ethical Business Practices, setting a high standard for conduct in financial transactions. It teaches that legal rights must be exercised with moral consideration, preventing lenders from leveraging their position to humiliate or exploit borrowers, thereby fostering a community built on mutual trust and respect, where all are considered "brothers" within the covenant.
Exposition and Analysis
Key Word Analysis
"to lend or (by reciprocity) borrow on security or interest." This word establishes the context of a financial transaction involving a loan, highlighting the role of the creditor. The law here regulates the conduct of the lender, not the legitimacy of the lending practice itself.
"a house (in the greatest variation of applications, especially family, etc.)." This term signifies the private dwelling, a place of personal security, family life, and dignity. The prohibition against entering the "house" emphasizes the inviolability of this private sphere, protecting the borrower from intrusion and public shame.
"a pawn; pledge." This refers to an item given as security for a loan. While taking a pledge was a legitimate part of ancient lending, this law focuses on the manner of its collection, ensuring that the process does not violate the borrower's dignity or privacy.
Verse Breakdown
"When thou dost lend thy brother any thing"
This opening clause sets the scene, identifying the parties involved as "brother" (implying a fellow Israelite, a member of the covenant community) and the nature of the transaction as a loan of "any thing" (referring to a loan of goods or money). It acknowledges the legitimate practice of lending within the community but immediately signals that ethical parameters will follow.
"thou shalt not go into his house"
This is the core, absolute prohibition. The direct, apodictic command ("thou shalt not") underscores the non-negotiable nature of this injunction. It explicitly forbids the lender from physically entering the borrower's private dwelling, emphasizing the sanctity of the home and the protection of the borrower's personal space.
"to fetch his pledge"
This final phrase clarifies the specific purpose for which entry is forbidden. It is not a general prohibition against entering a brother's house, but specifically against entering it to forcibly or intrusively retrieve the collateral. This implies that the borrower was expected to bring the pledge out to the lender, thus maintaining their dignity and preventing the lender from overstepping their bounds.
Literary Devices
Deuteronomy 24:10 employs several significant literary devices. The primary device is Legal Formulation, specifically an Apodictic Law presented in a direct, unconditional negative command ("thou shalt not go"). This contrasts with casuistic law ("If... then..."), emphasizing the absolute and non-negotiable nature of this ethical principle. There is also a strong element of Emphasis through the direct prohibition, drawing attention to the sanctity of the borrower's home and dignity. The law also functions as a form of Symbolism, where the "house" symbolizes the individual's personal space, privacy, and inherent worth, which must be respected even in a situation of debt. The phrase "thy brother" is an example of Covenantal Language, underscoring the communal and familial bond within Israel, elevating financial transactions beyond mere contractual agreements to interactions governed by mutual respect and shared identity. The very act of forbidding entry for a pledge collection subtly Foreshadows a society where compassion tempers justice, and human dignity is prioritized over creditors' absolute rights, setting a moral standard for communal interactions.
Theological and Thematic Connections
This seemingly simple law reveals profound theological truths about God's character and His expectations for His covenant people. It demonstrates that God's justice is not merely retributive but restorative and compassionate, deeply concerned with the dignity and well-being of every individual, especially the vulnerable. The command to respect the borrower's privacy and dignity in the collection of a pledge reflects the divine attribute of hesed (loyal love/mercy) and mishpat (justice), showing that true righteousness involves not just adherence to rules but also the cultivation of empathy and consideration for others. God desires a society where economic interactions are tempered by love for neighbor, preventing exploitation and fostering a community that genuinely reflects His own merciful nature. This law, therefore, serves as a practical outworking of the Great Commandment to love one's neighbor as oneself, demonstrating how that love should manifest even in challenging financial circumstances.
Reflection and Application
Deuteronomy 24:10 offers timeless principles that extend far beyond ancient lending practices. It calls us to cultivate a profound respect for the dignity and privacy of others, especially when we hold a position of power or advantage. In all our interactions, whether financial, professional, or personal, this verse challenges us to consider not just our rights or entitlements, but how we exercise them. Are we acting with empathy and compassion, or are we inadvertently causing humiliation or distress? This law encourages a posture of humility and consideration, reminding us that true ethical conduct is characterized by a concern for the other's well-being, even when they are in a vulnerable state. It prompts us to reflect on our own attitudes towards those who owe us something—be it money, an apology, or a favor—and to ensure that our pursuit of what is due does not violate their inherent worth or personal boundaries. It's a call to embody the Golden Rule in our daily lives, treating others as we would wish to be treated, particularly when power dynamics are at play, fostering environments of respect and trust rather than fear or shame.
Questions for Reflection
FAQ
Why was the lender forbidden from entering the borrower's house to collect the pledge?
The prohibition was primarily to protect the borrower's dignity and privacy. In ancient Israel, the home was considered a private and sacred space, a sanctuary for the family. A lender entering the house to seize a pledge would have been a humiliating and intrusive act, potentially leading to public shame or even conflict. This law ensured that even in a situation of debt, the borrower's personal space and honor were respected. The expectation was that the borrower would bring the pledge out of the house to the lender, maintaining their dignity and preventing the lender from overstepping their bounds. This reflects God's deep concern for the vulnerable and His desire for a just and compassionate society, as seen throughout the Deuteronomic laws (e.g., Deuteronomy 15:7-11).
What was the alternative way for the lender to collect the pledge?
The law implies that the borrower was to bring the pledge out of their house to the lender. The lender was to wait outside the house for the borrower to present the collateral. This method allowed the borrower to retain control over their private space and avoid the humiliation of a forced entry or public seizure of their belongings. It shifted the responsibility of presenting the pledge to the borrower, while strictly limiting the intrusive power of the lender. This aligns with other laws that protect the poor, such as the requirement to return a poor man's garment pledge by sunset (as found in Deuteronomy 24:12-13).
Does this specific law apply to Christians today?
While the literal application of collecting pledges in ancient Israelite society is no longer directly binding for Christians today, the underlying ethical and theological principles are timeless and highly relevant. The law embodies principles of compassion, respect for human dignity, ethical conduct in financial dealings, and the avoidance of exploiting or humiliating the vulnerable. Christians are called to live by a higher standard of love and justice, as taught by Jesus in the Sermon on the Mount (e.g., Matthew 5:7) and the Golden Rule (e.g., Matthew 7:12). Therefore, while we may not be collecting physical pledges, we are to apply the spirit of this law in all our interactions, especially in business and financial matters, ensuring we treat others with grace, fairness, and respect for their boundaries and dignity.
Christ-Centered Fulfillment
Deuteronomy 24:10, with its emphasis on compassion, dignity, and justice for the vulnerable, finds its ultimate and most profound fulfillment in the person and work of Jesus Christ. While the Old Testament law provided a shadow of God's perfect righteousness and love, Christ embodies and perfectly fulfills these attributes. Jesus consistently championed the cause of the poor, the marginalized, and the indebted, not merely through legal proscriptions but through radical acts of love and self-sacrifice. His teachings elevate the spirit of the law, moving beyond mere outward compliance to an internal transformation of the heart. The command to respect a borrower's dignity foreshadows Christ's own radical empathy and His call for His followers to love their neighbors as themselves (Matthew 22:39). Jesus teaches us to "do to others what you would have them do to you" (Matthew 7:12), a principle that far exceeds the Deuteronomic law by making compassion and self-giving the standard for all relationships, including those involving financial obligations. Furthermore, Christ himself became the ultimate "pledge" for humanity's debt of sin, offering His life to secure our redemption, yet doing so not through force or humiliation, but through humble self-giving on the cross (Philippians 2:5-8). He invites us into a covenant of grace where our debt is not merely managed with dignity, but completely paid, demonstrating God's ultimate mercy and justice, which the Old Testament laws could only hint at. In Christ, the principles of Deuteronomy 24:10 are not just upheld, but infinitely surpassed and perfectly realized in a new covenant of grace and truth (John 1:17).