Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
And their possessions and habitations were, Bethel and the towns thereof, and eastward Naaran, and westward Gezer, with the towns thereof; Shechem also and the towns thereof, unto Gaza and the towns thereof:
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
And their possessions H272 and habitations H4186 were, Bethel H1008 and the towns H1323 thereof, and eastward H4217 Naaran H5295, and westward H4628 Gezer H1507, with the towns H1323 thereof; Shechem H7927 also and the towns H1323 thereof, unto Gaza H5804 and the towns H1323 thereof:
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
Their possessions and settlements were Beit-El with its towns; Na'aran to the east; and to the west, Gezer with its towns; also Sh'khem with its towns, as far as 'Ayah and its towns;
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
Their holdings and settlements included Bethel and its villages, Naaran to the east, Gezer and its villages to the west, and Shechem and its villages as far as Ayyah and its villages.
Ask
American Standard Version
And their possessions and habitations were Beth-el and the towns thereof, and eastward Naaran, and westward Gezer, with the towns thereof; Shechem also and the towns thereof, unto Azzah and the towns thereof;
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
Their possessions and habitations were Bethel and its towns, and eastward Naaran, and westward Gezer, with its towns; Shechem also and its towns, to Azzah and its towns;
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
And their possessions and their habitations were Beth-el, and the villages thereof, and Eastward Naaran, and Westwarde Gezer with the villages thereof, Shechem also and the villages thereof, vnto Azzah, and the villages thereof,
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
And their possession and their dwellings are Beth-El and its small towns, and to the east Naaran, and to the west Gezer and its small towns, and Shechem and its small towns, unto Gaza and its small towns;
Ask

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

1 Chronicles 7:28 meticulously details the geographical scope of the tribe of Ephraim's inheritance within the Promised Land, listing significant cities and their surrounding towns. This verse, embedded within the extensive genealogies of Chronicles, serves as a tangible record of God's faithfulness in fulfilling His covenant promises of land to the descendants of Joseph, underscoring the established presence and territorial claims of one of Israel's most prominent tribes.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: This verse is situated within the lengthy and foundational genealogical sections of 1 Chronicles (chapters 1-9), which trace the lineage of Israel from Adam through the various tribal divisions. Specifically, 1 Chronicles 7 focuses on the tribes of Issachar, Benjamin, Naphtali, Manasseh, Ephraim, and Asher. Verse 28 provides a detailed territorial description for the tribe of Ephraim, one of the two tribes descended from Joseph. The Chronicler's meticulous inclusion of such geographical details highlights the fulfillment of God's promise of land, demonstrating the tangible reality of their inheritance and establishing a clear connection between the post-exilic community and their ancestral roots. This detailed record reinforced the legitimacy of their claim to the land upon their return from exile, offering assurance of God's enduring covenant.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: For ancient Israel, land ownership was inextricably linked to tribal identity, social structure, and covenant blessings. The distribution of land, as initially detailed in the book of Joshua, was a foundational act demonstrating God's faithfulness and the establishment of Israel as a nation in their promised territory. The Chronicler, writing centuries later (likely during or after the Babylonian exile, c. 450-400 BC), compiled these genealogies to remind the returning exiles of their identity as God's covenant people, their rightful inheritance in the land, and the continuity of God's redemptive plan despite the intervening exile. The mention of specific cities like Bethel, Shechem, and Gezer underscores the historical reality of their occupation and the fulfillment of ancient prophecies, providing a vital link to their pre-exilic heritage.
  • Key Themes: 1 Chronicles 7:28 contributes significantly to several overarching themes within the book. Firstly, it powerfully illustrates the theme of Divine Faithfulness and Inheritance, serving as concrete evidence of God's unwavering commitment to His covenant promise to Abraham to give his descendants the land of Canaan (e.g., Genesis 12:7). The detailed list of cities like Bethel, Shechem, and Gezer underscores the tangible nature of God's provision. Secondly, it reinforces Tribal Identity and Boundaries, as these geographical markers precisely define Ephraim's sphere of influence, distinguishing them from neighboring tribes and peoples, reflecting the ordered and specific way the land was distributed among the tribes, as outlined in Joshua 16. Lastly, the verse emphasizes the Historical Record and Continuity of Israel, demonstrating the Chronicler's commitment to preserving a vital historical document that confirms the lineage and territorial claims of the post-exilic community, connecting them directly to their ancestral roots and the original distribution of the land.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • Possessions (Hebrew, ʼăchuzzâh', H272): From a root meaning "to seize" or "to grasp," this term refers to something acquired or taken hold of, specifically a landed possession or inherited property. Its use here emphasizes that the listed territories were not merely occupied but were legitimate, divinely granted, and securely held inheritances of the Ephraimite tribe, underscoring the legal and covenantal basis of their claim.
  • Habitations (Hebrew, môwshâb', H4186): This word denotes a dwelling place, a settled abode, or a place of permanent residence. It signifies more than temporary encampments; it speaks of established communities, homes, and a secure, long-term presence. In the context of Ephraim, it highlights the stability and permanence of their settlement within the Promised Land, a fulfillment of God's promise to provide a resting place for His people.
  • Bethel (Hebrew, _Bêyth-_ʼÊl'__, H1008): Meaning "House of God," Bethel was a site of profound spiritual and historical significance in Israel's narrative, notably where Jacob encountered God and received covenant promises (Genesis 28:10-22). Its inclusion in Ephraim's territory emphasizes not just a geographical marker but a place deeply embedded in Israel's sacred history and identity, reinforcing the theological weight of their land inheritance as divinely appointed.

Verse Breakdown

  • "And their possessions and habitations [were], Bethel and the towns thereof": This clause establishes the core and foundational part of Ephraim's inherited territory. Bethel, a city of immense historical and spiritual importance, served as a key anchor for their tribal lands, signifying a well-established and divinely sanctioned presence. The phrase "and the towns thereof" indicates that the Ephraimite control extended beyond the main city to its surrounding villages, agricultural lands, and satellite communities, forming a comprehensive territorial unit.
  • "and eastward Naaran, and westward Gezer, with the towns thereof": This part of the verse delineates the east-west expansion of Ephraim's territory. Naaran (likely modern Na'aran or near Jericho) marked their eastern boundary, while Gezer (a strategically important city often contested between Israel and other powers, located on the border of the Philistine plain) defined their western reach. The repeated "with the towns thereof" reinforces the idea of a consolidated and extensive territorial claim, encompassing not just isolated cities but their entire regional spheres of influence.
  • "Shechem also and the towns thereof, unto Gaza and the towns thereof": This final clause further elaborates on the extent of Ephraim's land. Shechem, another city of great historical and covenantal significance (where Joshua gathered Israel for a covenant renewal in Joshua 24 and where Jacob settled), signifies a key northern or central possession. The concluding "unto Gaza and the towns thereof" indicates the furthest southern or southwestern reach of their claim, extending towards the coastal plain and the Philistine territories. This comprehensive listing paints a picture of a vast and significant tribal inheritance, emphasizing the full breadth of their promised land.

Literary Devices

The Chronicler employs Cataloging and Geographical Listing as primary literary devices in 1 Chronicles 7:28. This meticulous enumeration of cities and their associated towns serves to provide a precise and verifiable record of Ephraim's territorial inheritance. The cumulative effect of listing specific place names creates a sense of historical authenticity and concrete fulfillment of divine promises. Furthermore, the use of Merism can be observed in the east-west directional markers ("eastward Naaran, and westward Gezer") and the implied north-south span from Shechem to Gaza, effectively encompassing the entire breadth of Ephraim's territory. This detailed geographical description is not merely a dry list but a powerful affirmation of God's faithfulness and the tangible reality of Israel's promised land.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

1 Chronicles 7:28, though a seemingly simple list of place names, is profoundly theological. It stands as a testament to the unwavering faithfulness of God in fulfilling His ancient covenant promises to Abraham and his descendants regarding the gift of the land. This meticulous detailing of Ephraim's inheritance underscores that God's word is not abstract but concretely realized in history and geography. For the post-exilic community, this record would have served as a powerful reminder of their identity, their divine heritage, and the certainty of God's restorative purposes, even after periods of judgment and displacement. It affirmed their right to the land and provided a foundation for hope in God's continued provision and the re-establishment of His people.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

The detailed geographical record of 1 Chronicles 7:28, while seemingly remote, offers profound insights for contemporary believers. It reminds us that God's promises are not vague spiritual platitudes but have tangible, historical reality. Just as He faithfully provided a physical inheritance for Ephraim, He continues to fulfill His promises to us, whether in the daily provisions of life or the ultimate spiritual blessings in Christ. This verse encourages us to trust in the detailed and precise nature of God's providence, recognizing that even the "mundane" details of Scripture affirm His meticulous care and the certainty of His plans. It invites us to reflect on our own spiritual inheritance in Christ, which is far more enduring and glorious than any earthly territory, yet equally secure and guaranteed by God's faithfulness. It calls us to live with confidence in the God who keeps His word, even when circumstances seem to contradict His promises.

Questions for Reflection

  • How does the meticulous detail of this geographical list deepen your understanding of God's faithfulness to His promises?
  • In what ways do you see God's "possessions and habitations" for you, both spiritually and practically, being fulfilled in your life today?
  • How can the historical certainty of Israel's land inheritance encourage your trust in God's future promises for your life and for His church?

FAQ

Why does the Chronicler include such detailed geographical lists in a book primarily focused on genealogies?

Answer: The Chronicler's inclusion of detailed geographical lists, like that in 1 Chronicles 7:28, serves several crucial purposes for his post-exilic audience. Firstly, it provides concrete evidence of God's faithfulness in fulfilling His covenant promise to give the land of Canaan to Abraham's descendants (e.g., Genesis 12:7). The lists demonstrate that the promise was indeed realized in history. Secondly, for a people returning from exile, these lists affirmed their legitimate claim to the land and their tribal identity. Land ownership was fundamental to Israel's national and religious identity, and these records connected the returning exiles to their ancestral heritage and specific territorial rights. Thirdly, it underscored the continuity of God's plan and the enduring nature of His covenant with Israel, even after the disruption of the exile. It was a reminder that God's purposes for His people and their land remained steadfast, offering hope for restoration and re-establishment.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

While 1 Chronicles 7:28 details a physical inheritance in the land for the tribe of Ephraim, its ultimate theological trajectory points towards the spiritual inheritance found in Christ. The land of promise, with its specific boundaries and cities, was a tangible foretaste of God's ultimate provision and dwelling place for His people. In the New Testament, Jesus Christ is presented as the true and ultimate "inheritance" for believers (e.g., Colossians 1:12 and Ephesians 1:11). He is the one who secures for us an "inheritance that is imperishable, undefiled, and unfading, kept in heaven" (1 Peter 1:4). Just as Ephraim's territory was a gift of God's faithfulness, so too is our spiritual adoption and eternal dwelling with God in the new heavens and new earth, a reality secured by Christ's atoning work and resurrection (Revelation 21:1-4). The specific physical boundaries of Ephraim's land ultimately find their boundless fulfillment in the universal spiritual domain of Christ's kingdom, where all who are in Him are co-heirs with Him (Romans 8:17) and possess an eternal dwelling "not made with hands" (2 Corinthians 5:1). This spiritual inheritance is not limited by geography but extends to all who believe, transcending earthly boundaries and promising an eternal, secure dwelling with God Himself.

Copy as

Commentary on 1 Chronicles 7 verses 20–40

We have here an account,

I. Of the tribe of Ephraim. Great things we read of that tribe when it came to maturity. Here we have an account of the disasters of its infancy, while it was in Egypt as it should seem; for Ephraim himself was alive when those things were done, which yet is hard to imagine if it were, as is here computed, seven generations off. Therefore I am apt to think that either it was another Ephraim or that those who were slain were the immediate sons of that Ephraim that was the son of Joseph. In this passage, which is related here only, we have, 1. The great breach that was made upon the family of Ephraim. The men of Gath, Philistines, giants, slew many of the sons of that family, because they came down to take away their cattle, Ch1 7:21. It is uncertain who were the aggressors here. Some make the men of Gath the aggressors, men born in the land of Egypt, but now resident in Gath, supposing that they came down into the land of Goshen, to drive away the Ephraimites' cattle, and slew the owners, because they stood up in the defence of them. Many a man's life has been exposed and betrayed by his wealth; so far is it from being a strong city. Others think that the Ephraimites made a descent upon the men of Gath to plunder them, presuming that the time had come when they should be put in possession of Canaan; but they paid dearly for their rashness and precipitation. Those that will not wait God's time cannot expect God's blessing. I rather think that the men of Gath came down upon the Ephraimites, because the Israelites in Egypt were shepherds, not soldiers, abounded in cattle of their own, and therefore were not likely to venture their lives for their neighbours' cattle: and the words may be read, The men of Gath slew them, for they came down to take away their cattle. Zabad the son of Ephraim, and Shuthelah, and Ezer, and Elead (his grandchildren), were, as Dr. Lightfoot thinks, the men that were slain. Jacob had foretold that the seed of Ephraim should become a multitude of nations (Gen 48:19), and yet that plant is thus nipped in the bud. God's providences often seem to contradict his promises; but, when they do so, they really magnify the promise, and make the performance of it, notwithstanding, so much more illustrious. The Ephraimites were the posterity of Joseph, and yet his power could not protect them, though some think he was yet living. The sword devours one as well as another. 2. The great grief which oppressed the father of the family hereupon: Ephraim mourned many days. Nothing brings the aged to the grave with more sorrow than their following the young that descend from them to the grave first, especially if in blood. It is often the burden of those that live to be old that they see those go before them of whom they said, These same shall comfort us. It was a brotherly friendly office which his brethren did, when they came to comfort him under this great affliction, to express their sympathy with him and concern for him, and to suggest that to him which would support and quiet him under this sad providence. Probably they reminded him of the promise of increase which Jacob had blessed him when he laid his right hand upon his head. Although his house was not so with God as he hoped, but a house of mourning, a shattered family, yet that promise was sure, Sa2 23:5. 3. The repair of this breach, in some measure, by addition of another son to his family in his old age (Ch1 7:23), like Seth, another seed instead of that of Abel whom Cain slew, Gen 4:25. When God thus restores comfort to his mourners, makes glad according to the days wherein he afflicted, setting the mercies over against the crosses, we ought therein to take notice of the kindness and tenderness of divine Providence; it is as if it repented God concerning his servants, Psa 90:13, Psa 90:15. Yet joy that a man was born into his family could not make him forget his grief; for he gives a melancholy name to his son, Beriah - in trouble, for he was born when the family was in mourning, when it went evil with his house. It is good to have in remembrance the affliction and the misery, the wormwood and the gall, that our souls may be humbled within us, Lam 3:19, Lam 3:20. What name more proper for man that is born of a woman than Beriah, because born into a troublesome world? It is added, as a further honour to the house of Ephraim, (1.) That a daughter of that tribe, Sherah by name, at the time of Israel's setting in Canaan, built some cities, either at her own charge or by her own care; one of them bore her name, Uzzen-sherah, Ch1 7:24. A virtuous woman may be as great an honour and blessing to a family as a mighty man. (2.) That a son of that tribe was employed in the conquest of Canaan, Joshua the son of Nun, Ch1 7:27. In this also the breach made on Ephraim's family was further repaired; and perhaps the resentment of this injury formerly done by the Canaanites to the Ephraimites might make him more vigorous in the war.

II. Of the tribe of Asher. Some men of note of that tribe are here named. Their militia was not numerous in comparison with some other tribes, only 26,000 men in all; but their princes were choice and mighty men of valour, chief of the princes (Ch1 7:40), and perhaps it was their wisdom that they coveted not to make their trained bands numerous, but rather to have a few, and those apt to the war and serviceable men.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 20–40. Public domain.
Copy as
Theodoret of CyrusAD 458
QUESTIONS ON FIRST CHRONICLES, PROLOGUE
The Chronicles also speak about the tabernacle because a temple of the Lord had not yet been built by either Samuel or David. The text also adds that that the holy services were held in the tabernacle. Worship was observed at that time according to the number of the days of the week. For it also says, “and their kindred who were in their villages were obliged to come in every seven days, in turn, to be with them.” With regard to the holy utensils it says, “Some of them had charge of the utensils of service, for they were required to count them when they were brought in and taken out. Others of them were appointed over the furniture, and over all the holy utensils, also over the choice flour, the wine, the oil, the incense and the spices.” And about the priests it says, “Others, of the sons of the priests, prepared the mixing of the spices.” With regard to the tomb of Saul the Chronicles gives us much information, and in the Book of Kings itself we read that his bones were gathered and buried in the land of Jabesh.
Theodoret of CyrusAD 458
QUESTIONS ON 1 CHRONICLES, PROLOGUE
There is abundant information in the books of Chronicles which were written to continue the books of the Kings and to preserve the memory of such important events. The first book begins with a genealogy that sets out to demonstrate how the human race came from a single man. Since it focuses only on the single kingdom of Judah, it can tell us about its cities and the villages, and from where they took their names. Here we come to know Nathan, from whom the blessed Luke constructed the beginning of his genealogy of our Lord and Savior, Son of David and Solomon’s brother4 on his mother’s side: “The following children were born to him in Jerusalem: Shimeah, Shobab, Nathan and Solomon, that is, the four children he fathered with Bersabea, daughter of Ammiel.” And Rechab6 herself, who is mentioned in many books of Scripture, is said to have come from the tribe of Judah.It also clearly explains why Reuben lost his birthright and Joseph gained it and also, finally, the reason why the tribe of Judah obtained the highest honor: “The sons of Reuben the firstborn of Israel. He was the firstborn, but because he defiled his father’s bed his birthright was given to the sons of Joseph son of Israel, so that he is not enrolled in the genealogy according to the birthright; though Judah became prominent among his brothers and a ruler came from him, yet the birthright belonged to Joseph.” It also explains the reason why such a great honor was conceded to Joseph. By the will of God Judah had the dignity of receiving the Lord who was born from him according to the flesh. This is the sense tacitly expressed with the words “a leader from him.” Indeed the passage seems to assert that not only the kings of the earth derived from Judah, but also the eternal king himself who had no beginning and will never end.
It also describes the situation of the tribes beyond the Jordan, those of Reuben and Gad, and even the tribes of Manasseh which later were received into those of the Hagarites and the Itureans, and talks about the tribes of the Naphiseans, and all those peoples who entered into conflict with them. In addition the text relates how they fought and won, and made the Hagarites flee. And it also reports the reason for the victory: “When they received help against them, the Hagarites and all who were with them were given into their hands, for they cried to God in the battle, and he granted their entreaty because they trusted in him.” It also describes the amount of the spoils of war: “They captured their livestock: 50, of their camels, 250, sheep, 2, donkeys and 100, captives. Many were slain because the war was from God. And they lived in their territory until the exile.”
Theodoret of CyrusAD 458
QUESTIONS ON 1 CHRONICLES, PROLOGUE
The genealogy of the priests and the Levites comes after this. It relates that Zadok, who was high priest at the time of David, had been the eleventh from Aaron; that Azariah, nephew of Zadok, had been the first to receive the priestly anointing in the temple built by Solomon. Among them there was also Jehozadak, who was brought to Babylon as a war prisoner. Jesus9 was his son, a high priest as well, who delivered the people from bondage together with Zerubbabel, and built a temple for the Lord. Here we also learn that Korah, who revolted against the great Moses, was a nephew of Isaar, son of Caath and brother of Amram, Aaron’s and Moses’ father. According to this lineage he was related to the first legislator. But he himself paid in the desert for his errors, although his children did not share the punishment of their father. From here Samuel13 came and then Aeman, who intoned Psalms and was a nephew of the prophet Samuel. In fact he was the son of Joel, son of Samuel. On the other hand, Asaph, one of the singers, came from the lineage of Gerson, son of Levi and brother of Caath. Aetham, who also belonged to the group of the singers, had Merari, the third son of Levi, as great-grandfather.The text also explains the difference between the priests and the Levites. It relates that the Levites were initiated into all the ministries of the holy altar of God: “But Aaron and his sons made offerings on the altar of burnt offering and on the altar of incense, doing all the work of the most holy place, to make atonement for Israel, according to all that Moses the servant of God had commanded.” It seems to me, in fact, that this book was written after the return from Babylon. For this reason it also talks about the bondage and explains its cause: “So all Israel was enrolled by genealogies; and these are written in the book of the Kings of Israel. And Judah was taken into exile in Babylon because of their unfaithfulness. Now the first to live again in their possessions in their towns were Israelites, priests, Levites, and temple servants.” These accounts show that the book was begun after the captivity. Indeed no historian ever relates facts that happened afterwards, but what happened before or during his times. And actually only the prophets have the power to foretell the future. In addition it says that also those who had inhabited that land before them had been enslaved. And actually many of them still live with them: the Canaanites, Chettites, Jebusites, who had been their companions in such a misfortune. Also the priests and the Levites were brought into captivity with the Israelites. I believe that those who were called “the saints’ servants” were then called Nathinim. Many of them, in fact, consecrated themselves to the ministries of the priests and the Levites. There were among them also those who were entrusted with the carrying of the water, the gathering of wood and other necessary duties. Indeed, if it was imposed to the Gabaonites, who were foreigners, to follow Joshua in the praises and to perform some works as porters or carpenters, this task was even more the duty of the Israelites. As a proof of this I have found in the interpretation of Hebrew names that this name means “house of Iaō,” that is, “of the God who is.” The text, in fact, mentions the children of Israel and among them Judah and Benjamin, and Ephraim18 and Manasseh. It also mentions the priests and the Levites, who inhabited those cities. About the Korēnites it says that they derived from Korah. It also says that among them there had been the guardians of the temple of God as well, and it seems that this custom had been introduced by Samuel and David. “All these, who were chosen as gatekeepers at the thresholds, were two hundred twelve. They were enrolled by genealogies in their villages. David and the prophet Samuel established them in their office of trust. So they and their descendants were in charge of the gates of the house of the Lord, that is, the house of the tent, as guards. The gatekeepers were on the four sides, east, west, north, and south.”
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying 1 Chronicles 7:28 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.