Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
Non his son, Jehoshua his son.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
Non H5126 his son H1121, Jehoshua H3091 his son H1121.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
his son Nun and his son Y'hoshua.
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
Nun his son, and Joshua his son.
Ask
American Standard Version
Nun his son, Joshua his son.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
Nun his son, Joshua his son.
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
Non his sonne, Iehoshua his sonne.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
Non his son, Jehoshua his son.
Ask

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

1 Chronicles 7:27 is a concise yet profoundly significant entry within the extensive genealogies of the tribe of Ephraim, stating, "Non his son, Jehoshua his son." This verse serves as a critical link in the ancestral line of Joshua, the divinely appointed successor to Moses who led Israel into the Promised Land. Its inclusion underscores the meticulous record-keeping vital for establishing tribal identity and inheritance in post-exilic Israel, while subtly highlighting God's sovereign hand in preparing and preserving the lineage of key figures in salvation history.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: 1 Chronicles 7:27 is embedded within a lengthy genealogical section spanning chapters 1-9, which meticulously traces the lineages of Israel from Adam through the various tribes. Specifically, chapter 7 focuses on the descendants of Issachar, Benjamin, Naphtali, Manasseh, Ephraim, and Asher. The verses immediately preceding 1 Chronicles 7:27 (1 Chronicles 7:20-26) detail the lineage of Ephraim, including a poignant mention of the death of some of Ephraim's sons and the subsequent birth of Beriah. Following this, the lineage continues, with verse 27 serving as a direct and crucial link in the line leading to Joshua. This precise placement within the Ephraimite genealogy emphasizes the importance of this particular line, even amidst hundreds of other names, demonstrating the Chronicler's intent to highlight significant figures and divine continuity.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: The Book of 1 Chronicles was likely compiled and edited after the Babylonian exile, during a period when the returning exiles were seeking to re-establish their identity, heritage, and claims to land and tribal affiliations in the land of Israel. Genealogies were not mere lists; they were foundational legal and social documents. They validated land ownership, determined priestly and Levitical service, established tribal boundaries, and confirmed individual and communal identity. The meticulous detail, even for seemingly minor figures, reflects the cultural imperative to maintain clear distinctions and connections to the past, ensuring the continuity of God's covenant people. This post-exilic context explains the emphasis on lineage as a means of reaffirming God's faithfulness to His promises despite national upheaval and the loss of the Davidic monarchy.
  • Key Themes: This brief verse contributes significantly to several overarching themes in Chronicles. Firstly, it powerfully illustrates Genealogical Continuity and Divine Preservation, showing God's unwavering commitment to His covenant people by meticulously preserving their tribal lines, even through periods of dispersion and exile. Secondly, it highlights God's Meticulous Providence, demonstrating that every individual and every generation plays a part in God's overarching plan. The inclusion of such a concise yet pivotal ancestral link for a figure like Joshua underscores that God orchestrates human history with precision, preparing individuals over generations for specific roles. This is consistent with the broader Chronicler's emphasis on God's sovereignty over Israel's history, from the initial covenant with Abraham to the establishment of the Davidic kingdom, as seen in the extensive genealogies of 1 Chronicles 1-9. The verse also implicitly points to the theme of Preparation for Leadership, as it establishes the direct paternal line for the man chosen by God to succeed Moses and lead Israel into the Promised Land, a role detailed extensively in the book of Joshua.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • Non (Hebrew, Nûwn, H5126): This name (H5126), meaning "perpetuity," is primarily significant as the father of Joshua. While the KJV uses "Non" here, the more common and accurate transliteration is "Nun." His primary role in Scripture is to be the progenitor of one of Israel's most pivotal leaders, highlighting that even those whose lives are not extensively detailed play a crucial part in God's grand design. The name itself, "perpetuity," might subtly hint at the enduring legacy of his son and the continuity of God's plan through generations.
  • son (Hebrew, bên, H1121): This common Hebrew term (H1121) literally means "a son (as a builder of the family name)." In its widest sense, it encompasses various literal and figurative relationships, including grandson, subject, nation, or even a quality or condition. In this context, it precisely defines the direct paternal relationship, emphasizing the lineage's continuity and the direct descent that was crucial for establishing tribal identity and inheritance in ancient Israel. The repetition of "his son" underscores the direct and unbroken line.
  • Jehoshua (Hebrew, Yᵉhôwshûwaʻ, H3091): This profound name (H3091) means "Jehovah-saved" or "The Lord saves." It is a compound name derived from "Jehovah" (YHWH, the LORD) and "yasha" (to save, deliver). This is the original Hebrew name for the leader who succeeded Moses and led Israel into the Promised Land. Its theological weight is immense, as it directly foreshadows the saving work of God through human instrumentality. Furthermore, "Jehoshua" is the Hebrew equivalent of the Greek name "Iesous" (Ἰησοῦς), from which the English name "Jesus" is derived, establishing a direct linguistic and theological link between Joshua and Jesus Christ.

Verse Breakdown

  • "Non his son": This phrase establishes the direct paternal relationship. It identifies "Non" (Nun) as the father in this specific lineage, linking the subsequent name directly to him. In a genealogical context, this is a standard and essential connector, ensuring precision in tracing the family tree. The brevity here belies the profound significance of the individual it introduces, serving as the immediate predecessor to one of Israel's most iconic leaders.
  • "Jehoshua his son": This clause completes the direct paternal link, identifying "Jehoshua" (Joshua) as the son of Nun. The primary importance of this entire verse rests on the identity of "Jehoshua." In the vast sea of names within the Chronicler's genealogies, the inclusion of this specific link to Joshua is not accidental. It serves to firmly root one of Israel's greatest deliverers and leaders within the established tribal framework, confirming his legitimate heritage and divine appointment within the covenant community. This simple statement carries the weight of future national leadership and divine deliverance.

Literary Devices

The primary literary device at play in 1 Chronicles 7:27 is Genealogy. This is the overarching structure of the early chapters of Chronicles, serving not merely as a historical record but as a profound theological statement. Genealogies in the Bible emphasize continuity, divine faithfulness in preserving a chosen people, and the legitimate succession of leadership and inheritance, particularly crucial for the post-exilic community. The extreme Conciseness of this particular verse, stating only two names and their relationship, highlights the Chronicler's focus on what is essential. In a book filled with detailed lists, the brevity here draws attention to the significance of the individual mentioned, implicitly signaling his future importance. Furthermore, the name "Jehoshua" itself functions as a form of Prophetic Naming or Symbolism, as its meaning ("Yahweh is salvation") inherently points to the salvific role Joshua would play, and more profoundly, foreshadows the ultimate Savior, Jesus, whose name carries the same meaning.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

1 Chronicles 7:27, though brief, powerfully encapsulates God's meticulous involvement in human history and His faithfulness to His redemptive plan. It reminds us that God works through specific individuals and their lineages, preparing them over generations for His purposes. The inclusion of Joshua's direct paternal line among countless other names underscores that no detail is too small for God's sovereign attention, and that even seemingly ordinary family records are part of His grand narrative. This verse affirms God's commitment to preserving His people and raising up leaders for them, demonstrating His providential care in ensuring the right person is in the right place at the right time to advance His kingdom.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

The seemingly dry genealogical entry of 1 Chronicles 7:27 offers profound spiritual insights for contemporary believers. It teaches us that God is a God of intricate detail, who meticulously records and orchestrates the lives of individuals within the vast tapestry of human history. If He cares enough to preserve the lineage of a leader like Joshua, He certainly cares about the seemingly small details of our own lives, our heritage, and our place in His unfolding story. This verse encourages us to recognize that our lives, our families, and our spiritual heritage are not random but are part of God's intentional design. It calls us to consider how God has prepared us, through our unique backgrounds and experiences, for the specific purposes He has for us in His kingdom, even if those purposes feel small or unseen in the grand scheme. It fosters a sense of gratitude for our spiritual lineage, connecting us to a long line of faithful individuals through whom God has worked, and inspires us to live in a way that honors that heritage and contributes to the ongoing narrative of God's redemptive work in the world.

Questions for Reflection

  • How does understanding God's meticulous record-keeping in Scripture impact your view of His care for the details of your own life?
  • In what ways do you see your own heritage (familial, spiritual, cultural) as part of God's larger narrative and purpose?
  • How does the preparation of Joshua's lineage encourage you about God's long-term plans for His people and for individuals He calls to serve Him?

FAQ

Why are genealogies so important in the Bible, especially in Chronicles?

Answer: Genealogies in the Bible, particularly in Chronicles, serve multiple crucial purposes beyond mere historical record. They establish tribal identity and land claims for the returning exiles, confirming their legitimate place in the covenant community. They validate priestly and Levitical lines, ensuring proper worship. Theologically, they demonstrate God's faithfulness in preserving His chosen people and His promises across generations, especially the Davidic line leading to the Messiah. They show God's sovereign hand in history, meticulously orchestrating events and individuals to fulfill His redemptive plan, as seen in the detailed list of names found in 1 Chronicles 1-9.

What is the significance of the name "Jehoshua" (Joshua)?

Answer: The name "Jehoshua" (or Joshua) is highly significant because it means "Yahweh is salvation" or "The Lord saves." This name is a prophetic declaration of the role Joshua would play as the one chosen by God to lead Israel into the Promised Land, delivering them from their wilderness wandering and establishing them in their inheritance. More profoundly, "Jehoshua" is the Hebrew equivalent of the Greek name "Iesous," which is translated as "Jesus." This linguistic connection highlights Joshua as a type of Christ, foreshadowing the ultimate Savior whose very name, Jesus, means "He saves his people from their sins".

How does this brief verse contribute to the overall message of 1 Chronicles?

Answer: Despite its brevity, 1 Chronicles 7:27 contributes significantly to the overall message of Chronicles by reinforcing the themes of divine continuity and God's sovereign plan. The Chronicler's primary aim was to encourage the post-exilic community by reminding them of their rich heritage and God's unwavering faithfulness. By meticulously recording the lineage of a pivotal figure like Joshua, the verse subtly assures the readers that God is still at work, preserving His people and preparing leaders, just as He did in the past. It underscores that even seemingly small details in God's grand narrative are important, contributing to the larger story of His redemptive purposes for Israel and, ultimately, for all humanity.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

1 Chronicles 7:27, by meticulously preserving the lineage of Joshua, subtly points forward to Jesus Christ, the ultimate fulfillment of all God's promises and the true "Joshua" who leads His people into their eternal inheritance. Joshua, whose name means "Yahweh is salvation," serves as a powerful type of Christ. Just as Joshua led Israel out of the wilderness and into the physical Promised Land, Jesus, whose Greek name is derived directly from "Jehoshua," leads believers out of the wilderness of sin and into the spiritual Promised Land of salvation and eternal rest. The book of Hebrews explicitly draws this parallel, noting that Joshua did not give them the ultimate rest, implying a greater rest yet to come through Christ. Jesus is the greater Joshua, the one truly filled with the Spirit of wisdom and understanding, who accomplishes a far greater salvation than merely conquering earthly territory. His lineage, meticulously recorded in Matthew 1:1-17, confirms His rightful place as the Son of David, the promised Messiah, and the one whose very name proclaims that He will save His people from their sins. Thus, this brief genealogical entry in Chronicles ultimately directs our gaze to the Lamb of God, who takes away the sin of the world, our true and final deliverer, Jesus Christ.

Copy as

Commentary on 1 Chronicles 7 verses 20–40

We have here an account,

I. Of the tribe of Ephraim. Great things we read of that tribe when it came to maturity. Here we have an account of the disasters of its infancy, while it was in Egypt as it should seem; for Ephraim himself was alive when those things were done, which yet is hard to imagine if it were, as is here computed, seven generations off. Therefore I am apt to think that either it was another Ephraim or that those who were slain were the immediate sons of that Ephraim that was the son of Joseph. In this passage, which is related here only, we have, 1. The great breach that was made upon the family of Ephraim. The men of Gath, Philistines, giants, slew many of the sons of that family, because they came down to take away their cattle, Ch1 7:21. It is uncertain who were the aggressors here. Some make the men of Gath the aggressors, men born in the land of Egypt, but now resident in Gath, supposing that they came down into the land of Goshen, to drive away the Ephraimites' cattle, and slew the owners, because they stood up in the defence of them. Many a man's life has been exposed and betrayed by his wealth; so far is it from being a strong city. Others think that the Ephraimites made a descent upon the men of Gath to plunder them, presuming that the time had come when they should be put in possession of Canaan; but they paid dearly for their rashness and precipitation. Those that will not wait God's time cannot expect God's blessing. I rather think that the men of Gath came down upon the Ephraimites, because the Israelites in Egypt were shepherds, not soldiers, abounded in cattle of their own, and therefore were not likely to venture their lives for their neighbours' cattle: and the words may be read, The men of Gath slew them, for they came down to take away their cattle. Zabad the son of Ephraim, and Shuthelah, and Ezer, and Elead (his grandchildren), were, as Dr. Lightfoot thinks, the men that were slain. Jacob had foretold that the seed of Ephraim should become a multitude of nations (Gen 48:19), and yet that plant is thus nipped in the bud. God's providences often seem to contradict his promises; but, when they do so, they really magnify the promise, and make the performance of it, notwithstanding, so much more illustrious. The Ephraimites were the posterity of Joseph, and yet his power could not protect them, though some think he was yet living. The sword devours one as well as another. 2. The great grief which oppressed the father of the family hereupon: Ephraim mourned many days. Nothing brings the aged to the grave with more sorrow than their following the young that descend from them to the grave first, especially if in blood. It is often the burden of those that live to be old that they see those go before them of whom they said, These same shall comfort us. It was a brotherly friendly office which his brethren did, when they came to comfort him under this great affliction, to express their sympathy with him and concern for him, and to suggest that to him which would support and quiet him under this sad providence. Probably they reminded him of the promise of increase which Jacob had blessed him when he laid his right hand upon his head. Although his house was not so with God as he hoped, but a house of mourning, a shattered family, yet that promise was sure, Sa2 23:5. 3. The repair of this breach, in some measure, by addition of another son to his family in his old age (Ch1 7:23), like Seth, another seed instead of that of Abel whom Cain slew, Gen 4:25. When God thus restores comfort to his mourners, makes glad according to the days wherein he afflicted, setting the mercies over against the crosses, we ought therein to take notice of the kindness and tenderness of divine Providence; it is as if it repented God concerning his servants, Psa 90:13, Psa 90:15. Yet joy that a man was born into his family could not make him forget his grief; for he gives a melancholy name to his son, Beriah - in trouble, for he was born when the family was in mourning, when it went evil with his house. It is good to have in remembrance the affliction and the misery, the wormwood and the gall, that our souls may be humbled within us, Lam 3:19, Lam 3:20. What name more proper for man that is born of a woman than Beriah, because born into a troublesome world? It is added, as a further honour to the house of Ephraim, (1.) That a daughter of that tribe, Sherah by name, at the time of Israel's setting in Canaan, built some cities, either at her own charge or by her own care; one of them bore her name, Uzzen-sherah, Ch1 7:24. A virtuous woman may be as great an honour and blessing to a family as a mighty man. (2.) That a son of that tribe was employed in the conquest of Canaan, Joshua the son of Nun, Ch1 7:27. In this also the breach made on Ephraim's family was further repaired; and perhaps the resentment of this injury formerly done by the Canaanites to the Ephraimites might make him more vigorous in the war.

II. Of the tribe of Asher. Some men of note of that tribe are here named. Their militia was not numerous in comparison with some other tribes, only 26,000 men in all; but their princes were choice and mighty men of valour, chief of the princes (Ch1 7:40), and perhaps it was their wisdom that they coveted not to make their trained bands numerous, but rather to have a few, and those apt to the war and serviceable men.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 20–40. Public domain.
Copy as
Theodoret of CyrusAD 458
QUESTIONS ON FIRST CHRONICLES, PROLOGUE
The Chronicles also speak about the tabernacle because a temple of the Lord had not yet been built by either Samuel or David. The text also adds that that the holy services were held in the tabernacle. Worship was observed at that time according to the number of the days of the week. For it also says, “and their kindred who were in their villages were obliged to come in every seven days, in turn, to be with them.” With regard to the holy utensils it says, “Some of them had charge of the utensils of service, for they were required to count them when they were brought in and taken out. Others of them were appointed over the furniture, and over all the holy utensils, also over the choice flour, the wine, the oil, the incense and the spices.” And about the priests it says, “Others, of the sons of the priests, prepared the mixing of the spices.” With regard to the tomb of Saul the Chronicles gives us much information, and in the Book of Kings itself we read that his bones were gathered and buried in the land of Jabesh.
Theodoret of CyrusAD 458
QUESTIONS ON 1 CHRONICLES, PROLOGUE
There is abundant information in the books of Chronicles which were written to continue the books of the Kings and to preserve the memory of such important events. The first book begins with a genealogy that sets out to demonstrate how the human race came from a single man. Since it focuses only on the single kingdom of Judah, it can tell us about its cities and the villages, and from where they took their names. Here we come to know Nathan, from whom the blessed Luke constructed the beginning of his genealogy of our Lord and Savior, Son of David and Solomon’s brother4 on his mother’s side: “The following children were born to him in Jerusalem: Shimeah, Shobab, Nathan and Solomon, that is, the four children he fathered with Bersabea, daughter of Ammiel.” And Rechab6 herself, who is mentioned in many books of Scripture, is said to have come from the tribe of Judah.It also clearly explains why Reuben lost his birthright and Joseph gained it and also, finally, the reason why the tribe of Judah obtained the highest honor: “The sons of Reuben the firstborn of Israel. He was the firstborn, but because he defiled his father’s bed his birthright was given to the sons of Joseph son of Israel, so that he is not enrolled in the genealogy according to the birthright; though Judah became prominent among his brothers and a ruler came from him, yet the birthright belonged to Joseph.” It also explains the reason why such a great honor was conceded to Joseph. By the will of God Judah had the dignity of receiving the Lord who was born from him according to the flesh. This is the sense tacitly expressed with the words “a leader from him.” Indeed the passage seems to assert that not only the kings of the earth derived from Judah, but also the eternal king himself who had no beginning and will never end.
It also describes the situation of the tribes beyond the Jordan, those of Reuben and Gad, and even the tribes of Manasseh which later were received into those of the Hagarites and the Itureans, and talks about the tribes of the Naphiseans, and all those peoples who entered into conflict with them. In addition the text relates how they fought and won, and made the Hagarites flee. And it also reports the reason for the victory: “When they received help against them, the Hagarites and all who were with them were given into their hands, for they cried to God in the battle, and he granted their entreaty because they trusted in him.” It also describes the amount of the spoils of war: “They captured their livestock: 50, of their camels, 250, sheep, 2, donkeys and 100, captives. Many were slain because the war was from God. And they lived in their territory until the exile.”
Theodoret of CyrusAD 458
QUESTIONS ON 1 CHRONICLES, PROLOGUE
The genealogy of the priests and the Levites comes after this. It relates that Zadok, who was high priest at the time of David, had been the eleventh from Aaron; that Azariah, nephew of Zadok, had been the first to receive the priestly anointing in the temple built by Solomon. Among them there was also Jehozadak, who was brought to Babylon as a war prisoner. Jesus9 was his son, a high priest as well, who delivered the people from bondage together with Zerubbabel, and built a temple for the Lord. Here we also learn that Korah, who revolted against the great Moses, was a nephew of Isaar, son of Caath and brother of Amram, Aaron’s and Moses’ father. According to this lineage he was related to the first legislator. But he himself paid in the desert for his errors, although his children did not share the punishment of their father. From here Samuel13 came and then Aeman, who intoned Psalms and was a nephew of the prophet Samuel. In fact he was the son of Joel, son of Samuel. On the other hand, Asaph, one of the singers, came from the lineage of Gerson, son of Levi and brother of Caath. Aetham, who also belonged to the group of the singers, had Merari, the third son of Levi, as great-grandfather.The text also explains the difference between the priests and the Levites. It relates that the Levites were initiated into all the ministries of the holy altar of God: “But Aaron and his sons made offerings on the altar of burnt offering and on the altar of incense, doing all the work of the most holy place, to make atonement for Israel, according to all that Moses the servant of God had commanded.” It seems to me, in fact, that this book was written after the return from Babylon. For this reason it also talks about the bondage and explains its cause: “So all Israel was enrolled by genealogies; and these are written in the book of the Kings of Israel. And Judah was taken into exile in Babylon because of their unfaithfulness. Now the first to live again in their possessions in their towns were Israelites, priests, Levites, and temple servants.” These accounts show that the book was begun after the captivity. Indeed no historian ever relates facts that happened afterwards, but what happened before or during his times. And actually only the prophets have the power to foretell the future. In addition it says that also those who had inhabited that land before them had been enslaved. And actually many of them still live with them: the Canaanites, Chettites, Jebusites, who had been their companions in such a misfortune. Also the priests and the Levites were brought into captivity with the Israelites. I believe that those who were called “the saints’ servants” were then called Nathinim. Many of them, in fact, consecrated themselves to the ministries of the priests and the Levites. There were among them also those who were entrusted with the carrying of the water, the gathering of wood and other necessary duties. Indeed, if it was imposed to the Gabaonites, who were foreigners, to follow Joshua in the praises and to perform some works as porters or carpenters, this task was even more the duty of the Israelites. As a proof of this I have found in the interpretation of Hebrew names that this name means “house of Iaō,” that is, “of the God who is.” The text, in fact, mentions the children of Israel and among them Judah and Benjamin, and Ephraim18 and Manasseh. It also mentions the priests and the Levites, who inhabited those cities. About the Korēnites it says that they derived from Korah. It also says that among them there had been the guardians of the temple of God as well, and it seems that this custom had been introduced by Samuel and David. “All these, who were chosen as gatekeepers at the thresholds, were two hundred twelve. They were enrolled by genealogies in their villages. David and the prophet Samuel established them in their office of trust. So they and their descendants were in charge of the gates of the house of the Lord, that is, the house of the tent, as guards. The gatekeepers were on the four sides, east, west, north, and south.”
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying 1 Chronicles 7:27 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.