Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
Laadan his son, Ammihud his son, Elishama his son,
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
Laadan H3936 his son H1121, Ammihud H5989 his son H1121, Elishama H476 his son H1121,
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
his son La'dan, his son 'Ammihud, his son Elishama,
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
Ladan his son, Ammihud his son, Elishama his son,
Ask
American Standard Version
Ladan his son, Ammihud his son, Elishama his son,
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
Ladan his son, Ammihud his son, Elishama his son,
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
Laadan his sonne, Ammihud his sonne, Elishama his sonne,
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
Laadan his son, Ammihud his son, Elishama his son,
Ask
In the KJVVerse 10,562 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

1 Chronicles 7:26 is a concise yet profoundly significant verse embedded within the detailed genealogical record of the tribe of Ephraim, one of Joseph's sons. It meticulously traces three successive generations—Laadan, his son Ammihud, and Ammihud's son Elishama—serving a crucial role in preserving tribal identity, land rights, and national heritage for the post-exilic Israelite community. More profoundly, this verse highlights God's sovereign hand in history, meticulously preserving specific lineages through which key figures, such as Elishama's grandson Joshua, would emerge to fulfill His divine purposes in salvation history.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: This verse is situated within the broader genealogical sections of 1 Chronicles (chapters 1-9), which meticulously detail the lineages of the twelve tribes of Israel. Specifically, 1 Chronicles 7 focuses on the descendants of Issachar, Benjamin, Naphtali, Manasseh, and Ephraim. The section concerning Ephraim's lineage begins around 1 Chronicles 7:20, providing a foundational record of this prominent tribe. The repetitive "his son" structure is characteristic of biblical genealogies, emphasizing direct paternal descent and the unbroken chain of generations. These lists are not merely dry records but serve as a theological statement about God's faithfulness in preserving His people and preparing the way for His redemptive plan, often subtly foreshadowing future events or key individuals through the inclusion of specific names.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: The books of Chronicles were compiled after the Babylonian exile, a period of profound national and spiritual crisis for Israel. The returned exiles faced the daunting task of rebuilding their nation, re-establishing their identity, and reaffirming their covenant relationship with God. In this context, genealogies were indispensable. They provided concrete evidence of tribal affiliation, which was crucial for reclaiming ancestral land inheritances, determining eligibility for priestly service, and reinforcing a sense of continuity with their pre-exilic past. Knowing one's lineage connected individuals to the covenant promises made to Abraham and David, offering assurance that God had not abandoned His people despite their exile. The meticulous nature of these records underscores their vital role in the social, religious, and political fabric of ancient Israel.
  • Key Themes: The primary theme evident in 1 Chronicles 7:26 and the surrounding genealogies is Continuity and Lineage. God's meticulous preservation of family lines underscores His unwavering commitment to His covenant people, demonstrating that His promises endure through successive generations. This continuity is not random but speaks to Divine Providence in History, highlighting God's active and sovereign hand in guiding the course of human events. Even in seemingly ordinary lists of names, God is at work, orchestrating the emergence of individuals who will play pivotal roles in His grand narrative. The inclusion of Elishama, specifically, points to the future leadership of his grandson, Joshua, who would lead Israel into the Promised Land, as detailed in Numbers 13:16 and Joshua 1:1. This demonstrates God's Covenant Faithfulness, as He patiently and precisely fulfills His promises across centuries, preparing the way for His ultimate redemptive purposes.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • Laadan (Hebrew, Laʻdân', H3936): Derived from a root suggesting "for adornment" or "for a witness," Laadan here functions as the initial name in this specific three-generation sequence within the Ephraimite lineage. While the name itself carries potential meaning, its primary significance in this context is its role in establishing the direct line of descent leading to Ammihud.
  • son (Hebrew, bên', H1121): This common Hebrew term, meaning "son," is derived from a root indicating "to build." It signifies not merely a male offspring but also one who "builds" or continues the family name and lineage. In genealogies like this, "son" emphasizes the direct, paternal succession, ensuring the unbroken transmission of tribal identity, rights, and heritage through generations.
  • Ammihud (Hebrew, ʻAmmîyhûwd', H5989): This name, meaning "people of splendor" or "my people are glory," serves as the crucial intermediate link in the sequence. As with many biblical names, it likely conveyed a hopeful or theological statement by the parents. In 1 Chronicles 7:26, Ammihud's role is to bridge the connection between Laadan and Elishama, maintaining the integrity of the genealogical record.
  • Elishama (Hebrew, ʼĔlîyshâmâʻ', H476): Meaning "God of hearing" or "my God has heard," this name is particularly significant. Elishama is identified elsewhere in Scripture as the father of Nun and thus the grandfather of Joshua, the great leader who succeeded Moses and led Israel into the Promised Land. His inclusion in this verse, though brief, serves as a vital anchor point, connecting this Ephraimite lineage to one of Israel's most pivotal figures in the conquest and settlement of Canaan.

Verse Breakdown

  • "Laadan his son": This phrase establishes Laadan as the immediate descendant of the unnamed individual preceding him in the Ephraimite genealogy (likely Shuthelah, as per 1 Chronicles 7:20-21). It initiates the specific chain of paternal descent that the Chronicler wishes to record, demonstrating the meticulous tracking of tribal lines and the continuity of the Ephraimite family.
  • "Ammihud his son": This clause continues the direct lineage, identifying Ammihud as the son of Laadan. The repetitive "his son" structure is a hallmark of biblical genealogies, emphasizing the direct, unbroken transmission of identity, heritage, and tribal rights from father to son across generations, reinforcing the legitimacy and historical accuracy of the record.
  • "Elishama his son": This final clause in the verse names Elishama as the son of Ammihud. While seemingly just another name in a list, Elishama's presence is profoundly significant. As the grandfather of Joshua, his inclusion here subtly foreshadows the future leadership and divine intervention that will come through this very lineage, underscoring God's long-term plan for His people and His sovereign hand in raising up pivotal figures.

Literary Devices

The primary literary device at play in 1 Chronicles 7:26 is Genealogy itself, which functions as a structural and thematic framework throughout the early chapters of Chronicles. The Repetition of the phrase "his son" creates a rhythmic, almost chant-like quality, reinforcing the unbroken chain of paternal descent and the meticulous nature of the record. This repetitive structure serves to emphasize the continuity of God's covenant people through time and the divine faithfulness in preserving specific lines. Furthermore, the inclusion of Elishama, whose grandson Joshua is a monumental figure in Israelite history, employs a subtle form of Foreshadowing. By merely listing his name, the Chronicler implicitly points to the future significance that will emerge from this seemingly ordinary lineage, highlighting God's purposeful work through generations and His orchestration of key individuals for His redemptive plan.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

1 Chronicles 7:26, though a brief genealogical entry, profoundly illustrates God's meticulous attention to detail and His sovereign orchestration of history. It reminds us that even seemingly minor individuals within a long line contribute to God's overarching plan. The preservation of these names underscores the divine commitment to maintaining a people through whom His promises would be fulfilled, culminating in the advent of the Messiah. These genealogies are not merely historical records; they are theological statements about God's faithfulness, His covenant keeping, and His patient work across generations to bring about His redemptive purposes. They affirm that every life, however obscure, has a place in God's grand narrative.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

While a list of names from ancient history might initially seem detached from modern life, 1 Chronicles 7:26 offers profound lessons for contemporary believers. It serves as a powerful reminder of God's unwavering faithfulness across generations. Just as He meticulously preserved the lineage of Ephraim, ensuring the emergence of leaders like Joshua, so too does He work through the seemingly ordinary details of our lives and the lives of those who came before us. This verse encourages us to appreciate our own heritage, whether familial or spiritual, recognizing that we are part of a larger story, a continuous thread woven by God's providence. It challenges us to consider how our "ordinary" lives contribute to God's ongoing work in the world, reminding us that every individual, every family, and every generation plays a vital role in His grand design. Our existence is not accidental but part of a divine tapestry, calling us to live with purpose and trust in the God who orchestrates all things for His glory and our good.

Questions for Reflection

  • How does understanding God's faithfulness in preserving ancient lineages impact my trust in His plans for my own life and future, even when circumstances seem uncertain?
  • In what ways can I recognize and appreciate the "ordinary" contributions of those who have come before me, both in my family and in my spiritual heritage, and how can I honor their legacy?
  • How does the idea that every life, however seemingly minor, plays a part in God's grand design, encourage or challenge me to live with greater intentionality and purpose today?

FAQ

Why are genealogies so important in the Bible, especially in books like 1 Chronicles?

Answer: Genealogies are crucial in the Bible for several reasons. First, they establish identity and belonging, connecting individuals and tribes to their historical roots and to the covenant people of God. For the post-exilic community of Chronicles, this was vital for re-establishing national and tribal identity after displacement. Second, they determine inheritance and land rights, ensuring that land promised by God (e.g., in Numbers 26) remained within designated tribal families. Third, they validate religious offices, particularly for the priesthood, which required proof of descent from Aaron (e.g., Ezra 2:61-63). Finally, and most significantly, genealogies serve a theological purpose, demonstrating God's faithfulness in preserving specific lines through which His promises would be fulfilled, ultimately leading to the Messiah (e.g., Matthew 1).

What is the specific significance of Elishama in 1 Chronicles 7:26?

Answer: Elishama's significance in 1 Chronicles 7:26 lies primarily in his progeny. While the verse itself is brief, Elishama is identified in other biblical passages (such as Numbers 1:10) as the father of Nun and, consequently, the grandfather of Joshua. Joshua was the pivotal leader who succeeded Moses and led the Israelites in the conquest and settlement of the Promised Land, as recounted in the book of Joshua. Therefore, Elishama's inclusion in this genealogy, though seemingly minor, connects this Ephraimite lineage directly to a major figure in Israel's salvation history, underscoring God's meticulous plan and His sovereign hand in raising up leaders for His people.

How does 1 Chronicles 7:26 relate to the broader message of the book of 1 Chronicles?

Answer: 1 Chronicles 7:26, as part of the extensive genealogies in the book, is integral to the Chronicler's overarching message to the returned exiles. The book aims to remind them of their rich heritage, their covenant relationship with God, and the continuity of God's promises despite their exile. By meticulously listing these lineages, the Chronicler emphasizes that God has been faithful across generations, preserving His people and their tribal identities. This particular verse, highlighting a line that produced Joshua, reinforces the theme of God's active involvement in history, raising up leaders and fulfilling His purposes. It offers hope and reassurance that the same God who faithfully led their ancestors would continue to guide and restore them, affirming their place in God's ongoing plan for Israel and the world.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

The meticulous preservation of lineages, as seen in 1 Chronicles 7:26 and throughout the Old Testament genealogies, finds its ultimate and most profound fulfillment in the person of Jesus Christ. The very purpose of these detailed records, often spanning centuries, was to demonstrate God's unwavering faithfulness in maintaining a chosen line through which His redemptive plan would unfold. While 1 Chronicles 7:26 highlights the lineage leading to Joshua, a deliverer who brought Israel into the physical Promised Land, this foreshadows the greater Deliverer, Jesus, who brings His people into the spiritual and eternal promised land of salvation. The genealogies of Jesus in Matthew 1:1-17 and Luke 3:23-38 meticulously trace His descent, proving His rightful claim as the Messiah, the Son of David, and the Son of Abraham, in whom all God's promises find their "Yes" and "Amen" (2 Corinthians 1:20). Thus, every name in every Old Testament genealogy, including Laadan, Ammihud, and Elishama, contributes to the grand narrative of God's patient and precise work to bring forth the Lamb of God, who takes away the sin of the world (John 1:29), establishing a new and eternal covenant through His blood (Hebrews 9:15).

Copy as

Commentary on 1 Chronicles 7 verses 20–40

We have here an account,

I. Of the tribe of Ephraim. Great things we read of that tribe when it came to maturity. Here we have an account of the disasters of its infancy, while it was in Egypt as it should seem; for Ephraim himself was alive when those things were done, which yet is hard to imagine if it were, as is here computed, seven generations off. Therefore I am apt to think that either it was another Ephraim or that those who were slain were the immediate sons of that Ephraim that was the son of Joseph. In this passage, which is related here only, we have, 1. The great breach that was made upon the family of Ephraim. The men of Gath, Philistines, giants, slew many of the sons of that family, because they came down to take away their cattle, Ch1 7:21. It is uncertain who were the aggressors here. Some make the men of Gath the aggressors, men born in the land of Egypt, but now resident in Gath, supposing that they came down into the land of Goshen, to drive away the Ephraimites' cattle, and slew the owners, because they stood up in the defence of them. Many a man's life has been exposed and betrayed by his wealth; so far is it from being a strong city. Others think that the Ephraimites made a descent upon the men of Gath to plunder them, presuming that the time had come when they should be put in possession of Canaan; but they paid dearly for their rashness and precipitation. Those that will not wait God's time cannot expect God's blessing. I rather think that the men of Gath came down upon the Ephraimites, because the Israelites in Egypt were shepherds, not soldiers, abounded in cattle of their own, and therefore were not likely to venture their lives for their neighbours' cattle: and the words may be read, The men of Gath slew them, for they came down to take away their cattle. Zabad the son of Ephraim, and Shuthelah, and Ezer, and Elead (his grandchildren), were, as Dr. Lightfoot thinks, the men that were slain. Jacob had foretold that the seed of Ephraim should become a multitude of nations (Gen 48:19), and yet that plant is thus nipped in the bud. God's providences often seem to contradict his promises; but, when they do so, they really magnify the promise, and make the performance of it, notwithstanding, so much more illustrious. The Ephraimites were the posterity of Joseph, and yet his power could not protect them, though some think he was yet living. The sword devours one as well as another. 2. The great grief which oppressed the father of the family hereupon: Ephraim mourned many days. Nothing brings the aged to the grave with more sorrow than their following the young that descend from them to the grave first, especially if in blood. It is often the burden of those that live to be old that they see those go before them of whom they said, These same shall comfort us. It was a brotherly friendly office which his brethren did, when they came to comfort him under this great affliction, to express their sympathy with him and concern for him, and to suggest that to him which would support and quiet him under this sad providence. Probably they reminded him of the promise of increase which Jacob had blessed him when he laid his right hand upon his head. Although his house was not so with God as he hoped, but a house of mourning, a shattered family, yet that promise was sure, Sa2 23:5. 3. The repair of this breach, in some measure, by addition of another son to his family in his old age (Ch1 7:23), like Seth, another seed instead of that of Abel whom Cain slew, Gen 4:25. When God thus restores comfort to his mourners, makes glad according to the days wherein he afflicted, setting the mercies over against the crosses, we ought therein to take notice of the kindness and tenderness of divine Providence; it is as if it repented God concerning his servants, Psa 90:13, Psa 90:15. Yet joy that a man was born into his family could not make him forget his grief; for he gives a melancholy name to his son, Beriah - in trouble, for he was born when the family was in mourning, when it went evil with his house. It is good to have in remembrance the affliction and the misery, the wormwood and the gall, that our souls may be humbled within us, Lam 3:19, Lam 3:20. What name more proper for man that is born of a woman than Beriah, because born into a troublesome world? It is added, as a further honour to the house of Ephraim, (1.) That a daughter of that tribe, Sherah by name, at the time of Israel's setting in Canaan, built some cities, either at her own charge or by her own care; one of them bore her name, Uzzen-sherah, Ch1 7:24. A virtuous woman may be as great an honour and blessing to a family as a mighty man. (2.) That a son of that tribe was employed in the conquest of Canaan, Joshua the son of Nun, Ch1 7:27. In this also the breach made on Ephraim's family was further repaired; and perhaps the resentment of this injury formerly done by the Canaanites to the Ephraimites might make him more vigorous in the war.

II. Of the tribe of Asher. Some men of note of that tribe are here named. Their militia was not numerous in comparison with some other tribes, only 26,000 men in all; but their princes were choice and mighty men of valour, chief of the princes (Ch1 7:40), and perhaps it was their wisdom that they coveted not to make their trained bands numerous, but rather to have a few, and those apt to the war and serviceable men.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 20–40. Public domain.
Copy as
Theodoret of CyrusAD 458
QUESTIONS ON FIRST CHRONICLES, PROLOGUE
The Chronicles also speak about the tabernacle because a temple of the Lord had not yet been built by either Samuel or David. The text also adds that that the holy services were held in the tabernacle. Worship was observed at that time according to the number of the days of the week. For it also says, “and their kindred who were in their villages were obliged to come in every seven days, in turn, to be with them.” With regard to the holy utensils it says, “Some of them had charge of the utensils of service, for they were required to count them when they were brought in and taken out. Others of them were appointed over the furniture, and over all the holy utensils, also over the choice flour, the wine, the oil, the incense and the spices.” And about the priests it says, “Others, of the sons of the priests, prepared the mixing of the spices.” With regard to the tomb of Saul the Chronicles gives us much information, and in the Book of Kings itself we read that his bones were gathered and buried in the land of Jabesh.
Theodoret of CyrusAD 458
QUESTIONS ON 1 CHRONICLES, PROLOGUE
There is abundant information in the books of Chronicles which were written to continue the books of the Kings and to preserve the memory of such important events. The first book begins with a genealogy that sets out to demonstrate how the human race came from a single man. Since it focuses only on the single kingdom of Judah, it can tell us about its cities and the villages, and from where they took their names. Here we come to know Nathan, from whom the blessed Luke constructed the beginning of his genealogy of our Lord and Savior, Son of David and Solomon’s brother4 on his mother’s side: “The following children were born to him in Jerusalem: Shimeah, Shobab, Nathan and Solomon, that is, the four children he fathered with Bersabea, daughter of Ammiel.” And Rechab6 herself, who is mentioned in many books of Scripture, is said to have come from the tribe of Judah.It also clearly explains why Reuben lost his birthright and Joseph gained it and also, finally, the reason why the tribe of Judah obtained the highest honor: “The sons of Reuben the firstborn of Israel. He was the firstborn, but because he defiled his father’s bed his birthright was given to the sons of Joseph son of Israel, so that he is not enrolled in the genealogy according to the birthright; though Judah became prominent among his brothers and a ruler came from him, yet the birthright belonged to Joseph.” It also explains the reason why such a great honor was conceded to Joseph. By the will of God Judah had the dignity of receiving the Lord who was born from him according to the flesh. This is the sense tacitly expressed with the words “a leader from him.” Indeed the passage seems to assert that not only the kings of the earth derived from Judah, but also the eternal king himself who had no beginning and will never end.
It also describes the situation of the tribes beyond the Jordan, those of Reuben and Gad, and even the tribes of Manasseh which later were received into those of the Hagarites and the Itureans, and talks about the tribes of the Naphiseans, and all those peoples who entered into conflict with them. In addition the text relates how they fought and won, and made the Hagarites flee. And it also reports the reason for the victory: “When they received help against them, the Hagarites and all who were with them were given into their hands, for they cried to God in the battle, and he granted their entreaty because they trusted in him.” It also describes the amount of the spoils of war: “They captured their livestock: 50, of their camels, 250, sheep, 2, donkeys and 100, captives. Many were slain because the war was from God. And they lived in their territory until the exile.”
Theodoret of CyrusAD 458
QUESTIONS ON 1 CHRONICLES, PROLOGUE
The genealogy of the priests and the Levites comes after this. It relates that Zadok, who was high priest at the time of David, had been the eleventh from Aaron; that Azariah, nephew of Zadok, had been the first to receive the priestly anointing in the temple built by Solomon. Among them there was also Jehozadak, who was brought to Babylon as a war prisoner. Jesus9 was his son, a high priest as well, who delivered the people from bondage together with Zerubbabel, and built a temple for the Lord. Here we also learn that Korah, who revolted against the great Moses, was a nephew of Isaar, son of Caath and brother of Amram, Aaron’s and Moses’ father. According to this lineage he was related to the first legislator. But he himself paid in the desert for his errors, although his children did not share the punishment of their father. From here Samuel13 came and then Aeman, who intoned Psalms and was a nephew of the prophet Samuel. In fact he was the son of Joel, son of Samuel. On the other hand, Asaph, one of the singers, came from the lineage of Gerson, son of Levi and brother of Caath. Aetham, who also belonged to the group of the singers, had Merari, the third son of Levi, as great-grandfather.The text also explains the difference between the priests and the Levites. It relates that the Levites were initiated into all the ministries of the holy altar of God: “But Aaron and his sons made offerings on the altar of burnt offering and on the altar of incense, doing all the work of the most holy place, to make atonement for Israel, according to all that Moses the servant of God had commanded.” It seems to me, in fact, that this book was written after the return from Babylon. For this reason it also talks about the bondage and explains its cause: “So all Israel was enrolled by genealogies; and these are written in the book of the Kings of Israel. And Judah was taken into exile in Babylon because of their unfaithfulness. Now the first to live again in their possessions in their towns were Israelites, priests, Levites, and temple servants.” These accounts show that the book was begun after the captivity. Indeed no historian ever relates facts that happened afterwards, but what happened before or during his times. And actually only the prophets have the power to foretell the future. In addition it says that also those who had inhabited that land before them had been enslaved. And actually many of them still live with them: the Canaanites, Chettites, Jebusites, who had been their companions in such a misfortune. Also the priests and the Levites were brought into captivity with the Israelites. I believe that those who were called “the saints’ servants” were then called Nathinim. Many of them, in fact, consecrated themselves to the ministries of the priests and the Levites. There were among them also those who were entrusted with the carrying of the water, the gathering of wood and other necessary duties. Indeed, if it was imposed to the Gabaonites, who were foreigners, to follow Joshua in the praises and to perform some works as porters or carpenters, this task was even more the duty of the Israelites. As a proof of this I have found in the interpretation of Hebrew names that this name means “house of Iaō,” that is, “of the God who is.” The text, in fact, mentions the children of Israel and among them Judah and Benjamin, and Ephraim18 and Manasseh. It also mentions the priests and the Levites, who inhabited those cities. About the Korēnites it says that they derived from Korah. It also says that among them there had been the guardians of the temple of God as well, and it seems that this custom had been introduced by Samuel and David. “All these, who were chosen as gatekeepers at the thresholds, were two hundred twelve. They were enrolled by genealogies in their villages. David and the prophet Samuel established them in their office of trust. So they and their descendants were in charge of the gates of the house of the Lord, that is, the house of the tent, as guards. The gatekeepers were on the four sides, east, west, north, and south.”
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying 1 Chronicles 7:26 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.