Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
And the children of Gad dwelt over against them, in the land of Bashan unto Salchah:
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
And the children H1121 of Gad H1410 dwelt H3427 over against them, in the land H776 of Bashan H1316 unto Salchah H5548:
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
The descendants of Gad lived across from them, in the territory from Bashan to Salkhah:
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
The descendants of Gad lived next to the Reubenites in the land of Bashan, as far as Salecah:
Ask
American Standard Version
And the sons of Gad dwelt over against them, in the land of Bashan unto Salecah:
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
The sons of Gad lived over against them, in the land of Bashan to Salecah:
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
And the children of Gad dwelt ouer against them in the land of Bashan, vnto Salchah.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
And the sons of Gad, over-against them have dwelt in the land of Bashan unto Salcah,
Ask

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

1 Chronicles 5:11 meticulously records the geographical settlement of the tribe of Gad in the Transjordan region, specifying their dwelling "over against" other tribes in the fertile land of Bashan, extending eastward to the strategic town of Salchah. This precise delineation is a vital component of the Chronicler's extensive genealogical and territorial accounts, serving to underscore God's unwavering faithfulness in fulfilling His covenant promises regarding the land inheritance for the tribes of Israel, particularly those who chose to reside east of the Jordan River, thereby reaffirming the divine order and historical legitimacy of their claims for a post-exilic audience.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: 1 Chronicles 5:11 is embedded within the extensive genealogical records of 1 Chronicles (chapters 1-9), which systematically trace the lineage of Israel from Adam through its various tribal divisions. Specifically, chapter 5 focuses on the Transjordanian tribes: Reuben (vv. 1-10), Gad (vv. 11-17), and the half-tribe of Manasseh (vv. 18-26). This verse provides the precise geographical boundaries for the tribe of Gad, immediately following the description of Reuben's settlement and preceding the account of Manasseh's territory and the collective military prowess of these eastern tribes. The Chronicler's meticulous enumeration of these tribes and their land holdings serves a crucial purpose for his post-exilic audience: to emphasize the tangible fulfillment of God's promises, establish the legitimate claim of these tribes to their inheritance, and provide a sense of continuity and hope despite the intervening exile.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: The historical setting for this verse is the period following the conquest of Canaan, when the Israelite tribes settled into their divinely allotted territories. The Transjordan region, east of the Jordan River, was geographically distinct from Cisjordan (west of the Jordan). Bashan was a highly fertile plateau, renowned for its rich pastures, strong cattle, and stately oak trees, making it an ideal settlement for tribes like Gad, whose economy was largely pastoral. This land was originally conquered by Moses from Og, the king of Bashan, a significant victory recorded in Deuteronomy 3:1-13. Salchah, mentioned as the eastern boundary, was a town on the eastern edge of Bashan, near the Syrian desert, indicating the full extent of Gad's dominion. The Chronicler, writing centuries later (likely after the Babylonian exile), meticulously recounts these details to reaffirm Israel's historical identity, their divine right to the land, and God's enduring faithfulness despite their past failures and the trauma of exile.
  • Key Themes: The meticulous detailing of Gad's territory in 1 Chronicles 5:11 contributes to several overarching themes in the book of Chronicles. First, it powerfully underscores the theme of Territorial Inheritance and God's covenant faithfulness. The land was a central component of God's promise to Abraham (Genesis 12:7), and its precise allocation to each tribe demonstrates the tangible fulfillment of this divine pledge. Second, the verse reinforces the importance of Historical Record and Genealogies as a foundation for Israel's identity. The Chronicler's emphasis on lineage and geography served to connect the post-exilic community to their rich heritage and God's continuous work throughout their history, providing hope and continuity. Finally, it subtly highlights God's Provision, as the fertile land of Bashan was perfectly suited to the Gadites' needs, reflecting divine care for His people's specific livelihoods, as seen in their initial request for this land in Numbers 32:1-5.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • Gad (Hebrew, Gâd', H1410): This refers to Gad, a son of Jacob, encompassing his tribe and its designated territory. The tribe of Gad was known for its martial prowess and its preference for a pastoral lifestyle, leading them to settle in the fertile Transjordan region, east of the Jordan River, due to its abundant pastures suitable for their large herds, a decision detailed in Numbers 32.
  • Bashan (Hebrew, Bâshân', H1316): This denotes a highly fertile and strategically important plateau region located east of the Sea of Galilee and north of the Yarmuk River. It was renowned in ancient times for its rich pastures, strong cattle (often mentioned in prophetic literature, e.g., Amos 4:1), and dense forests of stately oak trees. Its possession by the Gadites (and half-Manasseh) represented a significant and valuable portion of their tribal inheritance due to its agricultural and pastoral wealth.
  • Salchah (Hebrew, Çalkâh', H5548): This refers to an ancient city located on the eastern edge of the Bashan plateau, near the border of the Syrian desert. Its inclusion in the description of Gad's territory serves as a specific geographical marker, defining the easternmost extent of their land. This detail underscores the meticulous nature of the Chronicler's record-keeping, providing a clear and precise boundary for the tribal inheritance and emphasizing the complete fulfillment of the land promise.

Verse Breakdown

  • "And the children of Gad dwelt over against them,": This opening clause introduces the primary subject – the tribe of Gad – and immediately establishes their spatial relationship to the tribes previously mentioned in the chapter, namely Reuben (1 Chronicles 5:1-10) and the half-tribe of Manasseh (whose territory is further described in 1 Chronicles 5:18-26). The phrase "dwelt" (Hebrew, yâshab' from H3427) implies a settled, permanent residence, emphasizing their legitimate claim to the land. "Over against them" indicates that their settlement was adjacent or opposite to the territories of these other Transjordan tribes, forming a contiguous block of Israelite land east of the Jordan.
  • "in the land of Bashan": This phrase specifies the primary geographical region of Gad's settlement. Bashan (Hebrew, Bâshân' from H1316, and "land" from ʼerets' H776) was a well-known, highly productive agricultural and pastoral area, famed for its fertility. Its inclusion here highlights the richness and suitability of the inheritance God provided for the Gadites, aligning with their initial request for land that could sustain their large herds (Numbers 32:1-5). This detail underscores God's precise and abundant provision.
  • "unto Salchah:": This final phrase provides a precise eastern boundary marker for the Gadite territory. Salchah (Hebrew, Çalkâh' from H5548) was a recognizable landmark at the edge of the settled land, extending towards the desert. This detail emphasizes the definitive and complete nature of their land allocation, leaving no ambiguity about the full extent of their inheritance within the promised land. It powerfully demonstrates God's meticulous fulfillment of His promises, ensuring every boundary was known and every claim legitimate.

Literary Devices

The Chronicler employs Geographical Specificity and Enumeration in 1 Chronicles 5:11. The precise naming of "Bashan" and "Salchah" provides a detailed geographical context, anchoring the abstract concept of tribal inheritance in concrete, identifiable locations. This specificity serves to validate the historical claims of the tribes and demonstrate the tangible fulfillment of God's promises, particularly for a post-exilic community seeking to re-establish its identity and claim to the land. Furthermore, this verse is part of a larger Enumeration of genealogies and territorial allotments that characterizes the early chapters of Chronicles. This meticulous cataloging not only preserves Israel's heritage but also underscores the divine order and faithfulness in distributing the land to each tribe according to their lineage, reinforcing the idea of a divinely ordained national identity and a divinely ordered society.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

1 Chronicles 5:11, though seemingly a simple geographical detail, powerfully reinforces the overarching biblical theme of God's covenant faithfulness and His meticulous provision for His people. The precise demarcation of Gad's territory in the fertile land of Bashan, extending to Salchah, serves as a tangible testament to God's unwavering commitment to the promises made to the patriarchs regarding the land of Canaan. This fulfillment of promises, even for tribes who chose to settle outside the main body of Israel west of the Jordan, underscores the comprehensive nature of God's care and His sovereign hand in orchestrating the details of His people's lives and inheritance. It reminds us that God's promises are not vague generalities but specific, detailed commitments that He faithfully brings to pass, even across generations and through various circumstances. This divine precision provides a foundation for trust in God's continuing work in the lives of His people.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

While 1 Chronicles 5:11 might initially appear as a dry historical record, it carries profound implications for our spiritual lives today. Just as God meticulously planned and provided a specific, fertile inheritance for the tribe of Gad, He continues to work with precision and purpose in our lives. This verse invites us to reflect on the unwavering faithfulness of God in fulfilling His promises, reminding us that His character is steadfast and His provisions are precise, even when we cannot fully discern the path. It encourages us to trust in His sovereign plan for our "inheritance" in Christ, which is far greater than any earthly territory. Furthermore, understanding the detailed nature of God's provision for the tribes should inspire us to be diligent stewards of the resources, talents, and opportunities He has entrusted to us, recognizing that every good gift comes from His hand. Our spiritual heritage, meticulously recorded in Scripture, serves as a foundational source for our faith, reminding us that we are part of a grand narrative of God's faithfulness across generations, providing stability and hope in an ever-changing world.

Questions for Reflection

  • How does the detailed description of Gad's inheritance in Bashan encourage your trust in God's specific provision for your life today?
  • In what ways can you better steward the "inheritance" (gifts, resources, relationships) God has given you, recognizing His faithfulness in providing them?
  • How does reflecting on God's historical faithfulness to Israel strengthen your hope and identity as part of His people, the church?

FAQ

Why did the tribes of Reuben, Gad, and half-Manasseh settle east of the Jordan River?

Answer: These tribes chose to settle east of the Jordan River primarily because the land was exceptionally well-suited for their large herds of livestock. As recorded in Numbers 32:1-5, they observed that the land of Jazer and Gilead (which included Bashan) was excellent for grazing and requested it from Moses. Moses granted their request on the condition that their fighting men would cross the Jordan with the other tribes and help conquer Canaan before returning to their inheritance. This arrangement is detailed further in Joshua 13, where their specific territorial allotments are described.

What was the significance of Bashan as a territory?

Answer: Bashan was a highly significant territory due to its exceptional fertility and strategic location. It was renowned for its rich pastures, which supported large herds of cattle (often referred to as "bulls of Bashan" or "cows of Bashan" in prophetic literature, e.g., Psalm 22:12), and its dense oak forests. Conquering Bashan from Og, its powerful king, was a major military victory for Israel (as described in Deuteronomy 3:1-7). Its possession represented a substantial and valuable part of the tribal inheritance, providing economic prosperity and a strong defensive position for the Transjordanian tribes, demonstrating God's abundant provision.

How does the Chronicler's emphasis on genealogies and land relate to the original audience?

Answer: The Chronicler, writing likely after the Babylonian exile, addressed a community that had returned to Judah and was seeking to re-establish its identity and connection to its past. The meticulous genealogies and land descriptions, like that in 1 Chronicles 5:11, served several crucial purposes for this audience. They reaffirmed the continuity of God's covenant with Israel despite the exile, demonstrated God's faithfulness in fulfilling His promises of land, and established the legitimate claims of the returning exiles to their ancestral heritage. This provided a sense of hope, stability, and divine purpose, reminding them that they were still God's chosen people with a divinely appointed place in the land, and that God's promises endure through all generations.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

While 1 Chronicles 5:11 describes an earthly inheritance of land for an ancient tribe, it subtly points forward to the ultimate and spiritual inheritance found in Jesus Christ. The meticulous detail with which God provided and demarcated the land for Gad foreshadows the precision, certainty, and abundance of the spiritual blessings and eternal inheritance secured for believers in Christ. Just as the land of Bashan was a rich provision for the Gadites, Christ is the true and ultimate provision, the "good land" in whom all the promises of God find their "Yes" and "Amen" (2 Corinthians 1:20). We, the New Testament church, are the true Israel of God, not defined by earthly boundaries or physical descent, but by our union with Christ (Galatians 3:29). Our inheritance is not a physical territory but "an inheritance that is imperishable, undefiled, and unfading, kept in heaven for you" (1 Peter 1:4). Christ Himself is our portion and our dwelling place, fulfilling the longing for security, provision, and belonging that the land represented for ancient Israel (Psalm 16:5; Ephesians 1:11). Through His atoning work, He has opened the way for us to enter into true rest and abundant life, far surpassing any earthly territory, leading us to the heavenly city, the New Jerusalem, where God Himself will dwell with His people forever (Hebrews 4:9-10; Revelation 21:1-4).

Copy as

Commentary on 1 Chronicles 5 verses 1–17

I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points

We have here an extract out of the genealogies,

I. Of the tribe of Reuben, where we have,

1.The reason why this tribe is thus postponed. It is confessed that Reuben was the first-born of Israel, and, upon that account, might challenge the precedency; but he forfeited his birthright by defiling his father's concubine, and was, for that, sentenced not to excel, Gen 49:4. Sin lessens men, thrusts them down from their excellency. Seventh-commandment sins especially leave an indelible stain upon men's names and families, a reproach which time will not wipe away. Reuben's seed, to the last, bear the disgrace of Reuben's sin. Yet, though that tribe was degraded, it was not discarded or disinherited. The sullying of the honour of an Israelite is not the losing of his happiness. Reuben loses his birthright, yet it does not devolve upon Simeon the next in order; for it was typical, and therefore must attend, not the course of nature, but the choice of grace. The advantages of the birthright were dominion and a double portion. Reuben having forfeited these, it was thought too much that both should be transferred to any one, and therefore they were divided. (1.) Joseph had the double portion; for two tribes descended from him, Ephraim and Manasseh, each of whom had a child's part (for so Jacob by faith blessed them, Heb 11:21; Gen 48:15, Gen 48:22), and each of those tribes was as considerable, and made as good a figure, as any one of the twelve, except Judah. But, (2.) Judah had the dominion; on him the dying patriarch entailed the sceptre, Gen 49:10 Of him came the chief ruler, David first, and, in the fulness of time, Messiah the Prince, Mic 5:2. This honour was secured to Judah, though the birthright was Joseph's; and, having this, he needed not envy Joseph the double portion.

2.The genealogy of the princes of this tribe, the chief family of it (many, no doubt, being omitted), to Beerah, who was head of this clan when the king of Assyria carried them captive, Ch1 5:4-6. Perhaps he is mentioned as prince of the Reubenites at that time because he did not do his part to prevent the captivity.

3.The enlargement of the coasts of this tribe. They increasing, and their cattle being multiplied, they crowded out their neighbours the Hagarites, and extended their conquests, though not to the river Euphrates, yet to the wilderness which abutted upon that river, Ch1 5:9, Ch1 5:10. Thus God did for his people as he promised them: he cast out the enemy from before them by little and little, and gave them their land as they had occasion for it, Exo 23:30.

II. Of the tribe of Gad. Some great families of that tribe are here named (Ch1 5:12), seven that were the children of Abihail, whose pedigree is carried upwards from the son to the father (Ch1 5:14, Ch1 5:15), as that Ch1 5:4, Ch1 5:5, is brought downwards from father to son. These genealogies were perfected in the days of Jotham king of Judah, but were begun some years before, in the reign of Jeroboam II, king of Israel. What particular reason there was for taking these accounts then does not appear; but it was just before they were carried away captive by the Assyrians, as appears Kg2 15:29, Kg2 15:31. When the judgments of God were ready to break out against them for their wretched degeneracy and apostasy then were they priding themselves in their genealogies, that they were the children of the covenant; as the Jews, in our Saviour's time, who, when they were ripe for ruin, boasted, We have Abraham to our father. Or there might be a special providence in it, and a favourable intimation that though they were, for the present, cast out, they were not cast off for ever. What we design to call for hereafter we keep an inventory of.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 1–17. Public domain.
Copy as
Theodoret of CyrusAD 458
QUESTIONS ON FIRST CHRONICLES, PROLOGUE
The Chronicles also speak about the tabernacle because a temple of the Lord had not yet been built by either Samuel or David. The text also adds that that the holy services were held in the tabernacle. Worship was observed at that time according to the number of the days of the week. For it also says, “and their kindred who were in their villages were obliged to come in every seven days, in turn, to be with them.” With regard to the holy utensils it says, “Some of them had charge of the utensils of service, for they were required to count them when they were brought in and taken out. Others of them were appointed over the furniture, and over all the holy utensils, also over the choice flour, the wine, the oil, the incense and the spices.” And about the priests it says, “Others, of the sons of the priests, prepared the mixing of the spices.” With regard to the tomb of Saul the Chronicles gives us much information, and in the Book of Kings itself we read that his bones were gathered and buried in the land of Jabesh.
Theodoret of CyrusAD 458
QUESTIONS ON 1 CHRONICLES, PROLOGUE
There is abundant information in the books of Chronicles which were written to continue the books of the Kings and to preserve the memory of such important events. The first book begins with a genealogy that sets out to demonstrate how the human race came from a single man. Since it focuses only on the single kingdom of Judah, it can tell us about its cities and the villages, and from where they took their names. Here we come to know Nathan, from whom the blessed Luke constructed the beginning of his genealogy of our Lord and Savior, Son of David and Solomon’s brother4 on his mother’s side: “The following children were born to him in Jerusalem: Shimeah, Shobab, Nathan and Solomon, that is, the four children he fathered with Bersabea, daughter of Ammiel.” And Rechab6 herself, who is mentioned in many books of Scripture, is said to have come from the tribe of Judah.It also clearly explains why Reuben lost his birthright and Joseph gained it and also, finally, the reason why the tribe of Judah obtained the highest honor: “The sons of Reuben the firstborn of Israel. He was the firstborn, but because he defiled his father’s bed his birthright was given to the sons of Joseph son of Israel, so that he is not enrolled in the genealogy according to the birthright; though Judah became prominent among his brothers and a ruler came from him, yet the birthright belonged to Joseph.” It also explains the reason why such a great honor was conceded to Joseph. By the will of God Judah had the dignity of receiving the Lord who was born from him according to the flesh. This is the sense tacitly expressed with the words “a leader from him.” Indeed the passage seems to assert that not only the kings of the earth derived from Judah, but also the eternal king himself who had no beginning and will never end.
It also describes the situation of the tribes beyond the Jordan, those of Reuben and Gad, and even the tribes of Manasseh which later were received into those of the Hagarites and the Itureans, and talks about the tribes of the Naphiseans, and all those peoples who entered into conflict with them. In addition the text relates how they fought and won, and made the Hagarites flee. And it also reports the reason for the victory: “When they received help against them, the Hagarites and all who were with them were given into their hands, for they cried to God in the battle, and he granted their entreaty because they trusted in him.” It also describes the amount of the spoils of war: “They captured their livestock: 50, of their camels, 250, sheep, 2, donkeys and 100, captives. Many were slain because the war was from God. And they lived in their territory until the exile.”
Theodoret of CyrusAD 458
QUESTIONS ON 1 CHRONICLES, PROLOGUE
The genealogy of the priests and the Levites comes after this. It relates that Zadok, who was high priest at the time of David, had been the eleventh from Aaron; that Azariah, nephew of Zadok, had been the first to receive the priestly anointing in the temple built by Solomon. Among them there was also Jehozadak, who was brought to Babylon as a war prisoner. Jesus9 was his son, a high priest as well, who delivered the people from bondage together with Zerubbabel, and built a temple for the Lord. Here we also learn that Korah, who revolted against the great Moses, was a nephew of Isaar, son of Caath and brother of Amram, Aaron’s and Moses’ father. According to this lineage he was related to the first legislator. But he himself paid in the desert for his errors, although his children did not share the punishment of their father. From here Samuel13 came and then Aeman, who intoned Psalms and was a nephew of the prophet Samuel. In fact he was the son of Joel, son of Samuel. On the other hand, Asaph, one of the singers, came from the lineage of Gerson, son of Levi and brother of Caath. Aetham, who also belonged to the group of the singers, had Merari, the third son of Levi, as great-grandfather.The text also explains the difference between the priests and the Levites. It relates that the Levites were initiated into all the ministries of the holy altar of God: “But Aaron and his sons made offerings on the altar of burnt offering and on the altar of incense, doing all the work of the most holy place, to make atonement for Israel, according to all that Moses the servant of God had commanded.” It seems to me, in fact, that this book was written after the return from Babylon. For this reason it also talks about the bondage and explains its cause: “So all Israel was enrolled by genealogies; and these are written in the book of the Kings of Israel. And Judah was taken into exile in Babylon because of their unfaithfulness. Now the first to live again in their possessions in their towns were Israelites, priests, Levites, and temple servants.” These accounts show that the book was begun after the captivity. Indeed no historian ever relates facts that happened afterwards, but what happened before or during his times. And actually only the prophets have the power to foretell the future. In addition it says that also those who had inhabited that land before them had been enslaved. And actually many of them still live with them: the Canaanites, Chettites, Jebusites, who had been their companions in such a misfortune. Also the priests and the Levites were brought into captivity with the Israelites. I believe that those who were called “the saints’ servants” were then called Nathinim. Many of them, in fact, consecrated themselves to the ministries of the priests and the Levites. There were among them also those who were entrusted with the carrying of the water, the gathering of wood and other necessary duties. Indeed, if it was imposed to the Gabaonites, who were foreigners, to follow Joshua in the praises and to perform some works as porters or carpenters, this task was even more the duty of the Israelites. As a proof of this I have found in the interpretation of Hebrew names that this name means “house of Iaō,” that is, “of the God who is.” The text, in fact, mentions the children of Israel and among them Judah and Benjamin, and Ephraim18 and Manasseh. It also mentions the priests and the Levites, who inhabited those cities. About the Korēnites it says that they derived from Korah. It also says that among them there had been the guardians of the temple of God as well, and it seems that this custom had been introduced by Samuel and David. “All these, who were chosen as gatekeepers at the thresholds, were two hundred twelve. They were enrolled by genealogies in their villages. David and the prophet Samuel established them in their office of trust. So they and their descendants were in charge of the gates of the house of the Lord, that is, the house of the tent, as guards. The gatekeepers were on the four sides, east, west, north, and south.”
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying 1 Chronicles 5:11 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.