Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
And in the days of Saul they made war with the Hagarites, who fell by their hand: and they dwelt in their tents throughout all the east land of Gilead.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
And in the days H3117 of Saul H7586 they made H6213 war H4421 with the Hagarites H1905, who fell H5307 by their hand H3027: and they dwelt H3427 in their tents H168 throughout H6440 all the east H4217 land of Gilead H1568.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
In the time of Sha'ul they went to war with the Hagri'im; after defeating them they occupied their tents throughout all the territory east of Gil'ad.
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
During the days of Saul they waged war against the Hagrites, who were defeated at their hands, and they occupied the homes of the Hagrites throughout the region east of Gilead.
Ask
American Standard Version
And in the days of Saul, they made war with the Hagrites, who fell by their hand; and they dwelt in their tents throughout all the land east of Gilead.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
In the days of Saul, they made war with the Hagrites, who fell by their hand; and they lived in their tents throughout all the land east of Gilead.
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
And in the dayes of Saul they warred with the Hagarims, which fell by their hands: and they dwelt in their tentes in all the East partes of Gilead.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
And in the days of Saul they have made war with the Hagarites, who fall by their hand, and they dwell in their tents over all the face of the east of Gilead.
Ask

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

1 Chronicles 5:10 provides a concise yet profound historical snapshot within the extensive genealogies of Israel's Transjordanian tribes—Reuben, Gad, and the half-tribe of Manasseh. It records a decisive military victory achieved by these tribes over the Hagarites during the early monarchy under King Saul, which resulted in the significant expansion and secure establishment of their dwelling places across the fertile eastern region of Gilead. This brief account underscores God's active hand in granting success and securing the promised inheritance for His people, even amidst periods of national transition and ongoing tribal conflicts.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: This verse is strategically placed within the opening genealogical sections of 1 Chronicles (chapters 1-9), which serve as the Chronicler's foundational narrative. Unlike the books of Samuel and Kings, which focus on the monarchy, the Chronicler emphasizes the continuity of Israel's identity through its tribal lineages and God's unwavering covenant faithfulness. 1 Chronicles 5 specifically details the tribes of Reuben, Gad, and the half-tribe of Manasseh, who had settled east of the Jordan River. Following the account of Reuben's loss of primogeniture in 1 Chronicles 5:1-2, the chapter proceeds to list their descendants, territorial possessions, and, significantly, their military exploits. Verse 10 functions as a crucial historical interjection within this primarily genealogical framework. It highlights the active role and divine blessing experienced by these eastern tribes, thereby reinforcing their integral place within the broader narrative of Israel's history and God's ongoing work among His people, demonstrating that God's hand was at work beyond the central monarchy.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: The precise dating "in the days of Saul" anchors this event to the formative period of the Israelite monarchy, roughly the late 11th to early 10th century BCE. This era was characterized by Israel's transition from a loose tribal confederacy to a more unified kingdom, though significant tribal autonomy, particularly for those east of the Jordan, persisted. The "Hagarites" (also known as Hagrites or Hagarenes) were a prominent Arabian nomadic people, likely a confederation of desert tribes, often hostile to Israel and renowned for their wealth in livestock. Their defeat by the Transjordanian tribes was a substantial military achievement, critical for securing vital pasturelands and trade routes. "Gilead" designates a fertile, strategically important region east of the Jordan River, celebrated for its rich grazing lands. The conflict described in 1 Chronicles 5:10 reflects the perpetual struggle for land and security in ancient Israel, where the divine promise of territory (Deuteronomy 1:8) often necessitated military action. The ability of these tribes to expand their territory and dwell "in their tents" (suggesting a pastoral, semi-nomadic lifestyle even within settled areas) underscores their successful adaptation to the region's resources and the favor granted by divine intervention.
  • Key Themes: The central themes embedded within 1 Chronicles 5:10 are Divine Providence and Military Success. The victory over the Hagarites, explicitly stating they "fell by their hand," is presented not merely as a result of human strength but implicitly as God's enablement. This aligns perfectly with the Chronicler's overarching theological perspective, where success and prosperity are consistently linked to divine favor and obedience (2 Chronicles 14:11). This military triumph directly leads to Territorial Expansion and Secure Inheritance. The phrase "they dwelt in their tents throughout all the east [land] of Gilead" emphasizes the tangible outcome: the tribes secured and expanded their dwelling places, thereby fulfilling aspects of the land promise given to Israel. This highlights the critical importance of land as both an inheritance and a visible sign of God's blessing in ancient Israel. Finally, the strategic inclusion of this specific historical event within a genealogical list underscores the Chronicler's Theological History. It demonstrates that even during the reign of Saul, a period often marked by his own struggles and God's judgment, God was actively working through other parts of Israel to establish their inheritance and demonstrate His unwavering faithfulness to the covenant, thereby providing a continuous narrative of God's interaction with His people.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • Hagarites (Hebrew, Hagrîy', H1905): This term refers to an Arabian people, likely a confederation of nomadic tribes, possibly descended from or associated with Hagar, Abraham's concubine. They inhabited the desert regions to the east of Gilead. Their defeat by the Transjordanian tribes represents a significant military achievement, as these were formidable and often hostile adversaries, whose presence challenged Israelite control over eastern pasturelands.
  • Gilead (Hebrew, Gilʻâd', H1568): This designates a prominent and highly fertile geographical region located east of the Jordan River. It was particularly valued for its rich pasturelands, making it an ideal and desirable territory for the pastoral tribes of Reuben, Gad, and the half-tribe of Manasseh. The expansion "throughout all the east [land] of Gilead" indicates a substantial increase in their territorial control and settlement within this economically vital area.
  • hand (Hebrew, yâd', H3027): In the phrase "fell by their hand," the Hebrew word yâd (hand) is used idiomatically to signify power, means, or effective action. Here, it denotes the decisive military might and successful execution of the battle by the Transjordanian tribes. In biblical contexts, when success is attributed to "their hand," it often carries the implicit understanding of divine enablement and blessing, suggesting that God empowered the tribes to achieve this victory.

Verse Breakdown

  • "And in the days of Saul": This opening clause functions as a precise chronological marker, situating the military engagement firmly within the reign of Saul, Israel's first king. This historical anchor places the event in the early period of the united monarchy, a time characterized by significant national development and ongoing conflicts with surrounding peoples for land and security.
  • "they made war with the Hagarites": "They" refers collectively to the Transjordanian tribes—Reuben, Gad, and the half-tribe of Manasseh—whose genealogies and initial settlements are detailed in the preceding verses of 1 Chronicles 5:1-9. This indicates an active and deliberate military campaign initiated by these tribes against the nomadic Hagarites, primarily driven by the need to secure and expand their vital pasturelands and resources.
  • "who fell by their hand": This phrase unequivocally declares a decisive and overwhelming victory for the Israelite tribes. The Hagarites were utterly defeated, succumbing to the military prowess and divine enablement of the Transjordanian forces. In biblical narrative, such a phrase often implies not just human strength but God's active involvement and favor, suggesting that the Lord granted success to His people in this conflict.
  • "and they dwelt in their tents throughout all the east [land] of Gilead": This concluding clause articulates the immediate and lasting consequence of their victory. "They dwelt in their tents" signifies a secure, established, and expanded presence, indicating either permanent or semi-permanent settlement. The phrase "throughout all the east [land] of Gilead" emphasizes a significant territorial gain, allowing these tribes to expand their grazing lands and consolidate their control over a vast and fertile region, thereby securing and enlarging their promised inheritance.

Literary Devices

1 Chronicles 5:10 is a masterclass in conveying significant historical and theological information with remarkable Conciseness and Brevity. The entire account of a major military engagement—its participants, outcome, and far-reaching consequences—is distilled into a single, compact sentence. The opening phrase "in the days of Saul" functions as a crucial Historical Marker, immediately orienting the reader to the specific chronological context within the early monarchy, even though the surrounding text is primarily genealogical. The expression "fell by their hand" employs Metonymy or Synecdoche, where "hand" represents the collective power, military might, and successful action of the Transjordanian tribes, subtly hinting at divine empowerment. The verse also serves as a potent Narrative Summary, encapsulating a complex historical event—a war, a decisive victory, and subsequent territorial expansion—into a succinct statement. Underlying these devices is a clear Theological Implication: the success of the tribes is presented as a testament to God's ongoing providence and faithfulness to His covenant promises, even when not explicitly stated, aligning perfectly with the Chronicler's broader theological agenda of highlighting God's active hand in Israel's history.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

1 Chronicles 5:10, though a brief historical note, resonates with profound theological themes central to Israel's identity and God's character. It powerfully illustrates God's active involvement in the history of His people, particularly in securing their promised inheritance. The victory over the Hagarites is not merely a testament to the military prowess of the Transjordanian tribes but a clear demonstration of divine enablement and faithfulness. In a period of transition and nascent monarchy, God continued to fulfill His ancient promises of land and security, showing that His covenant commitments transcend specific leadership or political structures. This event underscores the principle that God empowers His people to overcome obstacles and claim what He has destined for them, whether it be physical territory in the Old Testament or spiritual inheritance in the New. It reinforces the Chronicler's overarching message that success and blessing are intrinsically linked to God's favor and His ongoing work in the lives of those who belong to Him.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

The brief account in 1 Chronicles 5:10 offers profound insights for contemporary believers, reminding us that even within detailed historical records or seemingly mundane genealogies, God's active hand is perpetually at work, orchestrating events for the good of His people and the fulfillment of His promises. Just as the Transjordanian tribes secured their physical inheritance and expanded their territory through divine empowerment, we too are called to trust in God's sovereign ability to provide, protect, and prosper us in our spiritual inheritance. This verse encourages us to recognize that our "battles"—whether against spiritual opposition, personal struggles, or societal challenges—are not fought in our own strength but through God's enabling power. It speaks profoundly to the faithfulness of God to His covenant, assuring us that He remains committed to His promises for His church and for individual believers. Our task is to remain faithful, to engage with the "Hagarites" in our lives with courage and strategic wisdom, knowing that the ultimate victory belongs to the Lord, and that our "dwelling places" (our lives, our ministries, our families) can be expanded and secured by His grace and for His glory.

Questions for Reflection

  • How does recognizing God's active hand in historical events, like the victory over the Hagarites, strengthen our faith in His providence and sovereign control over our lives today?
  • In what areas of your life are you seeking "territorial expansion" or the securing of an "inheritance" (e.g., spiritual growth, ministry impact, relational healing), and how can you trust God's empowerment in those endeavors?
  • What "Hagarites" (significant challenges, persistent opposition, or spiritual strongholds) might you be facing currently, and how does the example of the Transjordanian tribes encourage you to rely on divine strength rather than solely your own?

FAQ

Who were the Hagarites, and why were they significant in this context?

Answer: The Hagarites (or Hagrites) were an Arabian nomadic people, likely a confederation of tribes associated with the lineage of Hagar, Abraham's concubine. They inhabited the desert regions east of Gilead and were known for their wealth in livestock and their frequent conflicts with settled peoples, including the Israelites. Their significance in 1 Chronicles 5:10 lies in their decisive defeat, which represents a major military achievement for the Transjordanian tribes. This victory not only secured their borders but also allowed them to expand into valuable pasturelands, demonstrating God's provision and enablement for His people to claim their promised inheritance.

Why does the Chronicler include such a specific historical detail within a genealogical section?

Answer: The Chronicler's inclusion of this specific historical detail within a genealogy serves several important purposes. Firstly, it validates the tribal claims and territorial possessions of Reuben, Gad, and the half-tribe of Manasseh, showing their active role in Israel's history and their right to the land. Secondly, it highlights God's ongoing faithfulness to His covenant promises, particularly the promise of land and victory, even in the early monarchy under Saul. The Chronicler often emphasizes divine providence and the blessings that come from obedience and reliance on God. This brief narrative interlude demonstrates that God was actively working through these tribes, securing their inheritance, even as the central monarchy was developing. It transforms a mere list of names into a dynamic record of God's interaction with His people.

What is the significance of the phrase "in the days of Saul"?

Answer: The phrase "in the days of Saul" provides a crucial historical anchor for the event, placing it within the early period of the Israelite monarchy (late 11th to early 10th century BCE). This is significant because it shows that even as Israel transitioned to a centralized kingdom, tribal autonomy and localized warfare continued, especially for the tribes east of the Jordan. While Saul's reign was often marked by his own struggles and conflicts, this verse indicates that God's favor and military success were still evident among other parts of Israel. It subtly contrasts with Saul's own often-troubled leadership, highlighting that God's work of securing the land and blessing His people was not solely dependent on the king in Jerusalem but extended to all the tribes of Israel, demonstrating a broader scope of divine activity and faithfulness to the entire covenant community.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

The victory of the Transjordanian tribes over the Hagarites and their subsequent territorial expansion, as recounted in 1 Chronicles 5:10, finds its ultimate and glorious fulfillment in Jesus Christ. The physical land and inheritance secured by the tribes foreshadow the spiritual inheritance that believers receive in Christ, which is imperishable, undefiled, and unfading, reserved in heaven (1 Peter 1:4). The military success and divine enablement granted to the tribes powerfully point to Christ's decisive victory over all the spiritual "Hagarites"—sin, death, and the powers of darkness—achieved through His sacrificial death on the cross and triumphant resurrection (Colossians 2:15, Hebrews 2:14). Just as the tribes expanded their dwelling places and secured their territory, so too does Christ empower His church, not through physical conquest but through the spiritual expansion of His eternal kingdom across the globe, as commanded in the Great Commission (Matthew 28:18-20). Believers, as part of Christ's body, are given authority and power by the Holy Spirit to be His witnesses and to see His dominion extend, securing a spiritual inheritance that far surpasses any earthly territory (Acts 1:8). Ultimately, Christ is the true King who secures our eternal dwelling place and ensures our ultimate triumph, establishing a kingdom that will never end (Daniel 7:14).

Copy as

Commentary on 1 Chronicles 5 verses 1–17

I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points

We have here an extract out of the genealogies,

I. Of the tribe of Reuben, where we have,

1.The reason why this tribe is thus postponed. It is confessed that Reuben was the first-born of Israel, and, upon that account, might challenge the precedency; but he forfeited his birthright by defiling his father's concubine, and was, for that, sentenced not to excel, Gen 49:4. Sin lessens men, thrusts them down from their excellency. Seventh-commandment sins especially leave an indelible stain upon men's names and families, a reproach which time will not wipe away. Reuben's seed, to the last, bear the disgrace of Reuben's sin. Yet, though that tribe was degraded, it was not discarded or disinherited. The sullying of the honour of an Israelite is not the losing of his happiness. Reuben loses his birthright, yet it does not devolve upon Simeon the next in order; for it was typical, and therefore must attend, not the course of nature, but the choice of grace. The advantages of the birthright were dominion and a double portion. Reuben having forfeited these, it was thought too much that both should be transferred to any one, and therefore they were divided. (1.) Joseph had the double portion; for two tribes descended from him, Ephraim and Manasseh, each of whom had a child's part (for so Jacob by faith blessed them, Heb 11:21; Gen 48:15, Gen 48:22), and each of those tribes was as considerable, and made as good a figure, as any one of the twelve, except Judah. But, (2.) Judah had the dominion; on him the dying patriarch entailed the sceptre, Gen 49:10 Of him came the chief ruler, David first, and, in the fulness of time, Messiah the Prince, Mic 5:2. This honour was secured to Judah, though the birthright was Joseph's; and, having this, he needed not envy Joseph the double portion.

2.The genealogy of the princes of this tribe, the chief family of it (many, no doubt, being omitted), to Beerah, who was head of this clan when the king of Assyria carried them captive, Ch1 5:4-6. Perhaps he is mentioned as prince of the Reubenites at that time because he did not do his part to prevent the captivity.

3.The enlargement of the coasts of this tribe. They increasing, and their cattle being multiplied, they crowded out their neighbours the Hagarites, and extended their conquests, though not to the river Euphrates, yet to the wilderness which abutted upon that river, Ch1 5:9, Ch1 5:10. Thus God did for his people as he promised them: he cast out the enemy from before them by little and little, and gave them their land as they had occasion for it, Exo 23:30.

II. Of the tribe of Gad. Some great families of that tribe are here named (Ch1 5:12), seven that were the children of Abihail, whose pedigree is carried upwards from the son to the father (Ch1 5:14, Ch1 5:15), as that Ch1 5:4, Ch1 5:5, is brought downwards from father to son. These genealogies were perfected in the days of Jotham king of Judah, but were begun some years before, in the reign of Jeroboam II, king of Israel. What particular reason there was for taking these accounts then does not appear; but it was just before they were carried away captive by the Assyrians, as appears Kg2 15:29, Kg2 15:31. When the judgments of God were ready to break out against them for their wretched degeneracy and apostasy then were they priding themselves in their genealogies, that they were the children of the covenant; as the Jews, in our Saviour's time, who, when they were ripe for ruin, boasted, We have Abraham to our father. Or there might be a special providence in it, and a favourable intimation that though they were, for the present, cast out, they were not cast off for ever. What we design to call for hereafter we keep an inventory of.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 1–17. Public domain.
Copy as
Theodoret of CyrusAD 458
QUESTIONS ON FIRST CHRONICLES, PROLOGUE
The Chronicles also speak about the tabernacle because a temple of the Lord had not yet been built by either Samuel or David. The text also adds that that the holy services were held in the tabernacle. Worship was observed at that time according to the number of the days of the week. For it also says, “and their kindred who were in their villages were obliged to come in every seven days, in turn, to be with them.” With regard to the holy utensils it says, “Some of them had charge of the utensils of service, for they were required to count them when they were brought in and taken out. Others of them were appointed over the furniture, and over all the holy utensils, also over the choice flour, the wine, the oil, the incense and the spices.” And about the priests it says, “Others, of the sons of the priests, prepared the mixing of the spices.” With regard to the tomb of Saul the Chronicles gives us much information, and in the Book of Kings itself we read that his bones were gathered and buried in the land of Jabesh.
Theodoret of CyrusAD 458
QUESTIONS ON 1 CHRONICLES, PROLOGUE
There is abundant information in the books of Chronicles which were written to continue the books of the Kings and to preserve the memory of such important events. The first book begins with a genealogy that sets out to demonstrate how the human race came from a single man. Since it focuses only on the single kingdom of Judah, it can tell us about its cities and the villages, and from where they took their names. Here we come to know Nathan, from whom the blessed Luke constructed the beginning of his genealogy of our Lord and Savior, Son of David and Solomon’s brother4 on his mother’s side: “The following children were born to him in Jerusalem: Shimeah, Shobab, Nathan and Solomon, that is, the four children he fathered with Bersabea, daughter of Ammiel.” And Rechab6 herself, who is mentioned in many books of Scripture, is said to have come from the tribe of Judah.It also clearly explains why Reuben lost his birthright and Joseph gained it and also, finally, the reason why the tribe of Judah obtained the highest honor: “The sons of Reuben the firstborn of Israel. He was the firstborn, but because he defiled his father’s bed his birthright was given to the sons of Joseph son of Israel, so that he is not enrolled in the genealogy according to the birthright; though Judah became prominent among his brothers and a ruler came from him, yet the birthright belonged to Joseph.” It also explains the reason why such a great honor was conceded to Joseph. By the will of God Judah had the dignity of receiving the Lord who was born from him according to the flesh. This is the sense tacitly expressed with the words “a leader from him.” Indeed the passage seems to assert that not only the kings of the earth derived from Judah, but also the eternal king himself who had no beginning and will never end.
It also describes the situation of the tribes beyond the Jordan, those of Reuben and Gad, and even the tribes of Manasseh which later were received into those of the Hagarites and the Itureans, and talks about the tribes of the Naphiseans, and all those peoples who entered into conflict with them. In addition the text relates how they fought and won, and made the Hagarites flee. And it also reports the reason for the victory: “When they received help against them, the Hagarites and all who were with them were given into their hands, for they cried to God in the battle, and he granted their entreaty because they trusted in him.” It also describes the amount of the spoils of war: “They captured their livestock: 50, of their camels, 250, sheep, 2, donkeys and 100, captives. Many were slain because the war was from God. And they lived in their territory until the exile.”
Theodoret of CyrusAD 458
QUESTIONS ON 1 CHRONICLES, PROLOGUE
The genealogy of the priests and the Levites comes after this. It relates that Zadok, who was high priest at the time of David, had been the eleventh from Aaron; that Azariah, nephew of Zadok, had been the first to receive the priestly anointing in the temple built by Solomon. Among them there was also Jehozadak, who was brought to Babylon as a war prisoner. Jesus9 was his son, a high priest as well, who delivered the people from bondage together with Zerubbabel, and built a temple for the Lord. Here we also learn that Korah, who revolted against the great Moses, was a nephew of Isaar, son of Caath and brother of Amram, Aaron’s and Moses’ father. According to this lineage he was related to the first legislator. But he himself paid in the desert for his errors, although his children did not share the punishment of their father. From here Samuel13 came and then Aeman, who intoned Psalms and was a nephew of the prophet Samuel. In fact he was the son of Joel, son of Samuel. On the other hand, Asaph, one of the singers, came from the lineage of Gerson, son of Levi and brother of Caath. Aetham, who also belonged to the group of the singers, had Merari, the third son of Levi, as great-grandfather.The text also explains the difference between the priests and the Levites. It relates that the Levites were initiated into all the ministries of the holy altar of God: “But Aaron and his sons made offerings on the altar of burnt offering and on the altar of incense, doing all the work of the most holy place, to make atonement for Israel, according to all that Moses the servant of God had commanded.” It seems to me, in fact, that this book was written after the return from Babylon. For this reason it also talks about the bondage and explains its cause: “So all Israel was enrolled by genealogies; and these are written in the book of the Kings of Israel. And Judah was taken into exile in Babylon because of their unfaithfulness. Now the first to live again in their possessions in their towns were Israelites, priests, Levites, and temple servants.” These accounts show that the book was begun after the captivity. Indeed no historian ever relates facts that happened afterwards, but what happened before or during his times. And actually only the prophets have the power to foretell the future. In addition it says that also those who had inhabited that land before them had been enslaved. And actually many of them still live with them: the Canaanites, Chettites, Jebusites, who had been their companions in such a misfortune. Also the priests and the Levites were brought into captivity with the Israelites. I believe that those who were called “the saints’ servants” were then called Nathinim. Many of them, in fact, consecrated themselves to the ministries of the priests and the Levites. There were among them also those who were entrusted with the carrying of the water, the gathering of wood and other necessary duties. Indeed, if it was imposed to the Gabaonites, who were foreigners, to follow Joshua in the praises and to perform some works as porters or carpenters, this task was even more the duty of the Israelites. As a proof of this I have found in the interpretation of Hebrew names that this name means “house of Iaō,” that is, “of the God who is.” The text, in fact, mentions the children of Israel and among them Judah and Benjamin, and Ephraim18 and Manasseh. It also mentions the priests and the Levites, who inhabited those cities. About the Korēnites it says that they derived from Korah. It also says that among them there had been the guardians of the temple of God as well, and it seems that this custom had been introduced by Samuel and David. “All these, who were chosen as gatekeepers at the thresholds, were two hundred twelve. They were enrolled by genealogies in their villages. David and the prophet Samuel established them in their office of trust. So they and their descendants were in charge of the gates of the house of the Lord, that is, the house of the tent, as guards. The gatekeepers were on the four sides, east, west, north, and south.”
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying 1 Chronicles 5:10 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.