Numbers 26:20

Translation
King James Version
And the sons of Judah after their families were; of Shelah, the family of the Shelanites: of Pharez, the family of the Pharzites: of Zerah, the family of the Zarhites.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
And the sons H1121 of Judah H3063 after their families H4940 were; of Shelah H7956, the family H4940 of the Shelanites H8024: of Pharez H6557, the family H4940 of the Pharzites H6558: of Zerah H2226, the family H4940 of the Zarhites H2227.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
The sons of Y'hudah who had descendants were: of Shelah, the family of the Shelani; of Peretz, the family of the Partzi; and of Zerach, the family of the Zarchi.
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
These were the descendants of Judah by their clans: The Shelanite clan from Shelah, the Perezite clan from Perez, and the Zerahite clan from Zerah.
Ask
American Standard Version
And the sons of Judah after their families were: of Shelah, the family of the Shelanites; of Perez, the family of the Perezites; of Zerah, the family of the Zerahites.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
The sons of Judah after their families were: of Shelah, the family of the Shelanites; of Perez, the family of the Perezites; of Zerah, the family of the Zerahites.
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
So were the sonnes of Iudah after their families: of Shelah came the familie of ye Shelanites: of Pharez, the familie of the Pharzites, of Zerah, the familie of the Zarhites.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
And sons of Judah, by their families, are: of Shelah the family of the Shelanite; of Pharez the family of the Pharzite; of Zerah the family of the Zarhite;
Ask
See also
Nehemiah 11:24Genesis 46:12Genesis 38:26Genesis 38:30Genesis 38:11Genesis 38:14Luke 3:33
In the KJVVerse 4,510 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

Numbers 26:20 meticulously records the three primary family lines descending from Judah—Shelah, Pharez, and Zerah—as part of Israel's second census in the plains of Moab. This detailed enumeration serves not merely as a demographic record but as a profound theological statement, underscoring God's unwavering faithfulness in preserving and multiplying His covenant people despite their wilderness failures. It highlights the divine preparation of a new generation for the inheritance of the Promised Land and reaffirms the enduring prominence of the tribe of Judah, from which the promised Messiah would ultimately emerge, demonstrating God's sovereign hand in orchestrating redemptive history through specific lineages.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: Numbers 26:20 is situated within the pivotal second census of Israel, conducted approximately 38 years after the initial census detailed in Numbers 1. This chapter immediately follows the devastating plague resulting from the Baal of Peor apostasy in Numbers 25, which had decimated the rebellious older generation. The census in Numbers 26 therefore functions as a divine re-establishment and reorganization of the nation, preparing a new, obedient generation for the impending conquest and division of the Promised Land. The specific instructions for land distribution are given immediately after the census in Numbers 26:52-56. Verse 20 focuses exclusively on the tribe of Judah, detailing its familial subdivisions, thereby emphasizing its enduring significance and numerical strength within the twelve tribes, a theme consistent with Judah's prominence throughout the Pentateuch.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: The setting for this census is the plains of Moab, on the eastern border of Canaan, signifying Israel's imminent entry into the Promised Land after forty years of wilderness wandering. The generation that had rebelled against God and was condemned to die in the wilderness had largely passed away, as prophesied in Numbers 14:29-35. This new census was thus crucial for practical and theological reasons: it provided an updated military roster for the conquest and a basis for the equitable distribution of land. Culturally, detailed genealogical records were vital in ancient Israel for establishing tribal and family identities, confirming inheritance rights, and organizing societal structures. The use of patronymic names (e.g., "Shelanites" from "Shelah") was a common ancient Near Eastern practice to delineate family lines and ensure continuity. Historically, the tribe of Judah had consistently been recognized for its numerical strength, having the largest population in both the first and second censuses, which underscored its destined leadership role among the tribes, as prophesied by Jacob in Genesis 49:8-12.
  • Key Themes: The meticulous record in Numbers 26:20, as part of the broader census, contributes to several overarching themes in the Book of Numbers and the Pentateuch. Firstly, it powerfully demonstrates Divine Faithfulness and Preservation: despite the previous generation's disobedience and the severity of God's judgment, He remained true to His covenant promises to Abraham to multiply his descendants and give them the land, as seen in Genesis 12:2. Secondly, it highlights Generational Continuity: the detailed listing of families like the Shelanites, Pharzites, and Zarhites underscores the unbroken lineage and the fulfillment of God's promise to maintain His people through successive generations, ensuring the continuity of the covenant. Thirdly, the census emphasizes God's commitment to Order and Organization: His plan for His people is characterized by structure, careful record-keeping, and a systematic approach to their societal, military, and spiritual well-being. Finally, this enumeration serves as a direct Preparation for Inheritance, ensuring that each family knew its tribal affiliation and its potential share in the land, thus linking the present generation to the future fulfillment of God's promises in Canaan.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • sons (Hebrew, בֵּן, bên, H1121): Literally meaning "son," this term extends broadly to encompass descendants, children, or members of a particular group. In the context of Numbers 26:20, "sons of Judah" refers to the direct male descendants who established the primary family lines within the tribe. This usage emphasizes the patriarchal structure of Israelite society and the importance of male lineage for tribal identity, inheritance, and the continuation of the family name, reflecting the foundational role of the individual in building the collective "family name."
  • Judah (Hebrew, יְהוּדָה, Yᵉhûwdâh, H3063): Derived from the root meaning "to praise" or "to give thanks," Judah was the fourth son of Jacob and Leah. He became the progenitor of the tribe that would eventually hold preeminence among the twelve tribes, from which both the Davidic kingship and, ultimately, the Messiah would emerge. His prominence in this census, as one of the largest tribes, foreshadows the significant leadership and royal destiny prophesied for his descendants in Genesis 49:8-12. The detailed enumeration of Judah's families here underscores the divine focus on this particular lineage within God's redemptive plan.
  • families (Hebrew, מִשְׁפָּחָה, mishpâchâh, H4940): This term refers to a "family" in the sense of a clan or subdivision within a larger tribe, typically based on patriarchal descent. Figuratively, it can also denote a class of persons or a species. The meticulous listing of these "families" in the census highlights the highly organized, hierarchical structure of Israelite society. This organization was crucial not only for military purposes and the equitable distribution of land but also for maintaining distinct tribal and familial identities, preserving genealogical records, and ensuring proper inheritance rights. It reflects God's attention to detail and His desire for order within His covenant community.
  • Pharez (Hebrew, פֶּרֶץ, Perets, H6557): Meaning "breach" or "bursting forth," Pharez was a son of Judah by Tamar, born with a unique narrative where he "burst forth" ahead of his twin brother Zerah (see Genesis 38:29). His inclusion here is profoundly significant, as Pharez is explicitly named in the messianic lineage of Jesus Christ in the New Testament genealogies (e.g., Matthew 1:3). His presence in this census, alongside his brothers, anchors this seemingly mundane demographic record firmly within the overarching narrative of God's sovereign plan to bring forth the Savior.

Verse Breakdown

  • "And the sons of Judah after their families were;": This introductory clause establishes the specific focus of the verse on the tribe of Judah, one of the most numerically significant and historically prominent tribes in Israel. The phrase "after their families" emphasizes the patriarchal and clan-based organization that was fundamental to Israelite society and the census's purpose, indicating that the following enumeration will detail the specific subdivisions within Judah's lineage, highlighting the meticulous nature of the divine record.
  • "of Shelah, the family of the Shelanites:": Shelah was the third son of Judah by the daughter of Shua (Genesis 38:5). His family, the Shelanites, represents one of the three major branches of Judah's descendants being counted in this census. Their inclusion signifies the continued existence and contribution of this lineage to the overall strength and composition of the tribe of Judah, ensuring that all established lines are accounted for in the preparation for the land inheritance.
  • "of Pharez, the family of the Pharzites:": Pharez, born to Judah through Tamar, is a pivotal figure due to his unique birth narrative and his crucial place in the lineage that would eventually lead to King David and Jesus Christ. The enumeration of the Pharzites highlights the divine preservation of this specific line, even amidst the larger tribal count, demonstrating God's sovereign hand in maintaining the ancestral path of the Messiah. This seemingly ordinary listing carries extraordinary redemptive weight, anchoring the census in the broader narrative of salvation history.
  • "of Zerah, the family of the Zarhites.": Zerah was the twin brother of Pharez, also born to Judah through Tamar (Genesis 38:30). The Zarhites represent the other significant branch from Judah's union with Tamar. Their inclusion completes the immediate familial breakdown of Judah's descendants relevant to this census, underscoring the comprehensive and meticulous nature of the record, ensuring all significant lines are accounted for and affirming the breadth of Judah's progeny.

Literary Devices

The primary literary device at play in Numbers 26:20, and indeed throughout the entire chapter, is Enumeration or Catalog. This meticulous listing of families and their progenitors serves to establish a comprehensive and official record of the Israelite population, vital for military organization and land distribution. The Repetition of the phrase "the family of the [name]ites" across the verse and the chapter reinforces the systematic and official nature of the census, emphasizing divine order and oversight in the re-establishment of the nation. Furthermore, the verse functions as a Genealogy within the broader census, tracing the specific lines of Judah's descendants. This genealogical aspect is crucial, as it connects the current generation in the plains of Moab back to their patriarchal roots, affirming continuity and God's faithfulness to His covenant promises, especially in preserving the lineage through which the Messiah would come. The seemingly dry list is thus imbued with profound theological significance due to its direct role in the unfolding of redemptive history.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

The meticulous detailing of Judah's families in Numbers 26:20 transcends mere demographic data; it is a profound testament to God's unwavering faithfulness and sovereign preservation of His covenant people. Despite the rebellion and demise of the previous generation in the wilderness, God ensures the continuity of Israel, demonstrating that His plans are not thwarted by human failure. This census, particularly the focus on specific family lines, underscores the divine commitment to the Abrahamic covenant to multiply Abraham's descendants and give them the land. It also highlights God's orderliness and attentiveness to detail, revealing a God who meticulously orchestrates history, even down to individual family units, for His overarching redemptive purposes. The inclusion of Pharez's line is particularly significant, subtly pointing towards the future leadership and messianic roles destined for Judah, affirming the divine foresight embedded in seemingly mundane records.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

Numbers 26:20, though seemingly a dry list of names, offers rich spiritual nourishment for the contemporary believer. It invites us to marvel at God's incredible patience and long-suffering with His people, as He faithfully raises up a new generation even after the failures of the old. This verse reminds us that God's purposes are generational; His plans extend far beyond our individual lives, weaving through families and communities across centuries. We are part of a larger story, a grand narrative of redemption that God is meticulously unfolding. It encourages us to trust in His sovereign oversight even in the mundane details of life, knowing that He is working all things together for His glory and our good. Just as He preserved and prepared the families of Judah for their inheritance, He is also preparing us, His spiritual Israel, for our eternal inheritance in Christ. This should inspire us to live faithfully in our own generation, contributing to the ongoing story of God's redemptive work, understanding that our seemingly small contributions are part of His grand design.

Questions for Reflection

  • How does the meticulous nature of this census, particularly the focus on family lines, deepen your understanding of God's character and His involvement in human history?
  • In what ways does the concept of "generational continuity" in God's plan encourage or challenge your perspective on your own legacy and the spiritual heritage you are building?
  • How can recognizing God's faithfulness to ancient Israel, despite their failures, strengthen your trust in His faithfulness to you in your current circumstances?

FAQ

Why is a census so important in the Book of Numbers?

Answer: The censuses in the Book of Numbers serve multiple crucial purposes. Firstly, they provide an accurate demographic count of the Israelite population, particularly those aged twenty years and upward who were able to go to war, as seen in Numbers 1:3. This was essential for military organization and readiness for conquest. Secondly, they were vital for the equitable division of the Promised Land, as the size of each tribe and family determined the extent of their inheritance, as explicitly stated in Numbers 26:52-56. Thirdly, the censuses, especially the second one in Numbers 26, demonstrate God's faithfulness in preserving and multiplying His people despite their rebellion and the judgment on the previous generation. It shows that God's covenant promises, such as those made to Abraham in Genesis 12:2, remained steadfast. Finally, they underscore the divine order and organization within the Israelite community, reflecting God's meticulous care for His people and His strategic preparation for their future.

What is the particular significance of Judah's prominence in this census?

Answer: The tribe of Judah holds a uniquely prominent position throughout Israel's history, and its detailed enumeration in Numbers 26:20 reflects this. From the very first census in Numbers 1, Judah was the largest tribe, a status it largely maintained in the second census. This numerical strength foreshadowed its future leadership role among the tribes. Jacob's prophetic blessing in Genesis 49:8-12 clearly designates Judah as the royal tribe, from which kings would emerge and ultimately the Messiah. The meticulous listing of Judah's families here, including the line of Pharez, reinforces the divine preservation of this specific lineage, ensuring the continuity of the promise that the "scepter shall not depart from Judah" (Genesis 49:10). Thus, Judah's prominence in the census is not merely demographic but deeply theological, pointing towards its central role in God's unfolding redemptive plan for humanity.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

Numbers 26:20, with its dry enumeration of Judah's families—Shelah, Pharez, and Zerah—serves as a crucial, albeit subtle, thread in the grand tapestry of God's redemptive plan, ultimately pointing to Jesus Christ. The meticulous preservation of the lineage of Judah, particularly through Pharez, is foundational to the unfolding of the messianic promise. It is through Pharez that the line of King David would emerge, as explicitly stated in the genealogies of Jesus found in Matthew 1:3 and Luke 3:33. This seemingly mundane census entry thus becomes a testament to God's unwavering faithfulness to His covenant promises, demonstrating His sovereign hand in orchestrating history, even down to individual family lines, to bring forth the promised Savior. Jesus, as the ultimate "Son of David" and "Lion of the tribe of Judah" (Revelation 5:5), fulfills the ancient prophecies and the very purpose of Judah's prominence. He is the true inheritor of all things, the one who brings His people into their ultimate spiritual inheritance, far surpassing the earthly land promised in Numbers. The meticulous record of this earthly lineage underscores the real, historical embodiment of God's eternal Son, who entered human history to redeem humanity and establish His eternal kingdom, fulfilling the very purpose for which Israel was preserved and counted. He is the true "breach" (Pharez) who broke through sin and death to secure eternal life for His people, leading them into the true promised land of His presence.

Copy as

Commentary on Numbers 26 verses 5–51

This is the register of the tribes as they were now enrolled, in the same order that they were numbered in ch. 1. Observe,

I. The account that is here kept of the families of each tribe, which must not be understood of such as we call families, those that live in a house together, but such as were the descendants of the several sons of the patriarchs, by whose names, in honour of them, their posterity distinguished themselves and one another. The families of the twelve tribes are thus numbered: - Of Dan but one, for Dan had but one son, and yet that tribe was the most numerous of all except Judah, Num 26:42, Num 26:43. Its beginning was small, but its latter end greatly increased. Zebulun was divided into three families, Ephraim into four, Issachar into four, Naphtali into four, and Reuben into four; Judah, Simeon, and Asher, had five families apiece, Gad and Benjamin seven apiece, and Manasseh eight. Benjamin brought ten sons into Egypt (Gen 46:21), but three of them, it seems either died childless or their families were extinct, for here we find seven only of those names preserved, and that whole tribe none of the most numerous; for Providence, in the building up of families and nations, does not tie itself to probabilities. The barren hath borne seven, and she that hath many children has waxed feeble, Sa1 2:5.

II. The numbers of each tribe. And here our best entertainment will be to compare these numbers with those when they were numbered at Mount Sinai. The sum total was nearly the same; they were now 1820 fewer than they were then; yet seven of the tribes had increased in number. Judah had increased 1900, Issachar 9900, Zebulun 3100, Manasseh 20,500, Benjamin 10,200, Dan 1700, and Asher 11,900. But the other five had decreased more than to balance that increase. Reuben had decreased 2770, Simeon 37,100, Gad 5150, Ephraim 8000, and Naphtali 8000. In this account we may observe, 1. that all the three tribes that were encamped under the standard of Judah, who was the ancestor of Christ, had increased, for his church shall be edified and multiplied. 2. That none of the tribes had increased so much as that of Manasseh, which in the former account was the smallest of all the tribes, only 32,200, while here it is one of the most considerable; and that of his brother Ephraim, which there was numerous, is here one of the least. Jacob had crossed hands upon their heads, and had preferred Ephraim before Manasseh, which perhaps the Ephraimites had prided themselves too much in, and had trampled upon their brethren the Manassites; but, when the Lord saw that Manasseh was despised, he thus multiplied him exceedingly, for it is his glory to help the weakest, and raise up those that are cast down. 3. That none of the tribes decreased so much as Simeon did; from 59,300, it such to 22,200, little more than a third part of what it was. One whole family of that tribe (namely Ohad, mentioned Exo 6:15) was extinct in the wilderness. Hence Simeon is not mentioned in Moses's blessing (Deu. 33), and the lot of that tribe in Canaan was inconsiderable, only a canton out of Judah's lot, Jos 19:9. Some conjecture that most of those 24,000 who were cut off by the plague for the iniquity of Peor were of that tribe; for Zimri, who was a ringleader in that iniquity, was a prince of that tribe, many of whom therefore were influenced by his example to follow his pernicious ways.

III. In the account of the tribe of Reuben mention is made of the rebellion of Dathan and Abiram, who were of that tribe, in confederacy with Korah a Levite, Num 26:9-11. Though the story had been largely related but a few chapters before, yet here it comes in again, as fit to be had in remembrance and thought of by posterity, whenever they looked into their pedigree and pleased themselves with the antiquity of their families and the glory of their ancestors, that they might call themselves a seed of evil doers. Two things are here said of them: - 1. That they had been famous in the congregation, Num 26:9. Probably they were remarkable for their ingenuity, activity, and fitness for business: - That Dathan and Abiram that might have been advanced in due time under God and Moses; but their ambitious spirits put them upon striving against God and Moses, and when they quarrelled with the one they quarrelled with the other. And what was the issue? 2. Those that might have been famous were made infamous: they became a sign, Num 26:10. They were made monuments of divine justice; God, in their ruin, showed himself glorious in holiness, and so they were set up for a warning to all others, in all ages, to take heed of treading in the steps of their pride and rebellion. Notice is here taken of the preservation of the children of Korah (Num 26:11); they died not, as the children of Dathan and Abiram did, doubtless because they kept themselves pure from the infection, and would not join, no, not with their own father, in rebellion. If we partake not of the sins of sinners, we shall not partake of their plagues. These sons of Korah were afterwards, in their posterity, eminently serviceable to the church, being employed by David as singers in the house of the Lord; hence many psalms are said to be for the sons of Korah: and perhaps they were made to bear his name so long after, rather than the name of any other of their ancestors, for warning to themselves, and as an instance of the power of God, which brought those choice fruits even out of that bitter root. The children of families that have been stigmatized should endeavour, by their eminent virtues, to roll away the reproach of their fathers.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 5–51. Public domain.
Copy as
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Numbers 26:20 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

Read & Compare

Commentaries

Original Language & Research

Sermons, Hymns & Audio

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.