Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
¶ And they went and came to Moses, and to Aaron, and to all the congregation of the children of Israel, unto the wilderness of Paran, to Kadesh; and brought back word unto them, and unto all the congregation, and shewed them the fruit of the land.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
And they went H3212 and came H935 to Moses H4872, and to Aaron H175, and to all the congregation H5712 of the children H1121 of Israel H3478, unto the wilderness H4057 of Paran H6290, to Kadesh H6946; and brought back H7725 word H1697 unto them, and unto all the congregation H5712, and shewed H7200 them the fruit H6529 of the land H776.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
and went to Moshe, Aharon and the entire community of the people of Isra'el at Kadesh in the Pa'ran Desert, where they brought back word to them and to the entire community and showed them the fruit of the land.
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
and they went back to Moses, Aaron, and the whole congregation of Israel in the Wilderness of Paran at Kadesh. They brought back a report for the whole congregation and showed them the fruit of the land.
Ask
American Standard Version
And they went and came to Moses, and to Aaron, and to all the congregation of the children of Israel, unto the wilderness of Paran, to Kadesh; and brought back word unto them, and unto all the congregation, and showed them the fruit of the land.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
They went and came to Moses, to Aaron, and to all the congregation of the children of Israel, to the wilderness of Paran, to Kadesh; and brought back word to them and to all the congregation. They showed them the fruit of the land.
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
Then after fourtie dayes, they turned againe from searching of the land.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
And they go and come in unto Moses, and unto Aaron, and unto all the company of the sons of Israel, unto the wilderness of Paran, to Kadesh; and they bring them and all the company back word, and shew them the fruit of the land.
Ask
See on the biblical-era map
From Mt. Sinai to Kadesh Barnea
From Mt. Sinai to Kadesh Barnea View full PDF
Journey of the Spies to Canaan
Journey of the Spies to Canaan View full PDF

Map © Biblica Open Bible Maps · CC BY-SA 4.0

In the KJVVerse 4,102 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

Numbers 13:26 chronicles the momentous return of the twelve Israelite spies, concluding their forty-day reconnaissance mission into the promised land of Canaan. Arriving back at Kadesh in the wilderness of Paran, they present their comprehensive report to Moses, Aaron, and the entire gathered congregation of Israel. This pivotal moment is underscored by the tangible display of the land's extraordinary produce, serving as irrefutable evidence of its fertility. The scene is set for a critical national decision, one that would profoundly test the nation's faith, obedience, and commitment to God's covenant promises, ultimately determining their immediate destiny.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: This verse is strategically positioned within the Book of Numbers, serving as the dramatic culmination of the reconnaissance mission and the immediate prelude to Israel's profound crisis of faith. The preceding verses Numbers 13:1-25 detail God's command to send one leader from each tribe to scout Canaan, their forty-day journey, and their initial observations. Numbers 13:26 marks the spies' arrival at the assembly, transitioning the narrative from the mission's execution to the delivery of the report. This report, and the subsequent conflicting interpretations, will provoke the people's response, which tragically leads to their prolonged wilderness wandering, as detailed in Numbers 14. The narrative emphasizes that Israel stands literally on the threshold of their divinely promised inheritance, making this moment of reporting a critical pivot point for their national destiny.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: In the ancient Near East, sending out scouts or spies was a standard military and strategic practice before any significant invasion or settlement. Such missions gathered vital intelligence on terrain, resources, and enemy strength. For the Israelites, recently liberated from Egypt and journeying through a harsh wilderness under divine guidance, this mission carried immense theological and practical weight. Kadesh-barnea, located in the wilderness of Paran, was a crucial oasis and a major encampment site for the Israelites, serving as a strategic staging ground for their intended entry into Canaan. The act of presenting the "fruit of the land" was a customary and highly effective way to demonstrate the land's fertility and potential to a gathered assembly. This concrete evidence was intended to inform and persuade the collective, who would then decide their next move. This collective decision-making process, though tragically flawed by unbelief, reflects the tribal social structure and the nascent stages of Israel's national identity.
  • Key Themes:
    • Accountability and Communal Decision-Making: The spies' immediate and direct report to Moses, Aaron, and the entire congregation underscores the importance of transparent leadership and the communal nature of decision-making within early Israel. The information gathered was not for an elite few but for the whole assembly, highlighting the shared responsibility and the collective consequences that would follow. This communal aspect is vital, as the people's subsequent response, rather than just the leaders', determines their fate.
    • Tangible Evidence of God's Promise: The "fruit of the land"—specifically described in Numbers 13:23 as a massive cluster of grapes, pomegranates, and figs—served as undeniable, physical proof of Canaan's astonishing fertility and abundance. This visual display was meant to confirm God's repeated description of the land as one "flowing with milk and honey," thereby bolstering the faith of the Israelites in God's ability and faithfulness to fulfill His covenant promises. It was a divine provision, a foretaste of the blessings awaiting them.
    • A Pivotal Moment and Test of Faith: This verse marks the conclusion of the reconnaissance phase and the onset of the critical decision-making period. The stage is perfectly set for the people to respond to the report, which would ultimately reveal the depth (or lack thereof) of their faith and obedience to God. Their reaction would determine the immediate trajectory of their journey, leading either to immediate entry into the Promised Land or to prolonged wilderness wandering, making this a defining moment in Israel's history.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • Paran (Hebrew, Pa'ran', H6290): Meaning "ornamental." This refers to the "wilderness of Paran," a vast, desolate desert region south of Canaan and west of the Arabah. Its mention here emphasizes the stark contrast between the harsh environment the Israelites had endured and the lush bounty of the land from which the spies returned. This geographical detail highlights the miraculous nature of God's provision and the profound choice confronting Israel: to trust God for entry into abundance or to remain in the barrenness of unbelief.
  • Kadesh (Hebrew, Qa'desh', H6946): Meaning "sanctuary" or "holy." This location, often referred to as Kadesh-barnea, was a crucial oasis and a major encampment for Israel, serving as the gateway to the Promised Land. The name itself, signifying holiness, carries a tragic irony, as this "holy" place would tragically become the site of Israel's greatest act of unbelief and rebellion, leading directly to their forty-year wilderness wandering and the forfeiture of their immediate inheritance.
  • Fruit (Hebrew, pᵉrîy', H6529): Meaning "fruit (literally or figuratively); bough, (first-)fruit(-ful), reward." In this context, "the fruit of the land" carries immense symbolic and theological weight. It is not merely agricultural yield but tangible, irrefutable evidence of God's promised blessing and the land's inherent goodness. The sheer size and abundance of the fruit (as described in Numbers 13:23) were meant to inspire faith and confirm the divine promise, making the subsequent unbelief and rejection of the land all the more egregious and inexcusable.

Verse Breakdown

  • "And they went and came to Moses, and to Aaron, and to all the congregation of the children of Israel,": This opening clause emphasizes the immediate and direct nature of the spies' return from their mission. Their prompt appearance before the highest leadership (Moses and Aaron) and, crucially, before the entire assembly, underscores the public and communal nature of the report. This highlights that the decision and its far-reaching consequences would affect every Israelite, emphasizing shared responsibility and collective destiny.
  • "unto the wilderness of Paran, to Kadesh;": This phrase precisely specifies the geographical location of the gathering. Kadesh-barnea, situated within the wilderness of Paran, served as the final staging point before the intended entry into Canaan. Its mention firmly grounds the narrative in a specific, known location, emphasizing the nation's proximity to the Promised Land and the critical juncture at which they stood, poised on the brink of their inheritance.
  • "and brought back word unto them, and unto all the congregation,": This reiterates the dual audience—the leaders and the people—and signifies the formal delivery of their intelligence. The phrase "brought back word" (Hebrew: shuv davar, from H7725 and H1697) implies an official, comprehensive report, not just casual conversation. It marks the completion of their reconnaissance and the initiation of the next crucial phase: the national response to the intelligence gathered, which would determine their immediate future.
  • "and shewed them the fruit of the land.": This climactic action provides the tangible, visual evidence of their mission's success in surveying the land's bounty. The "fruit" (H6529) serves as irrefutable proof of Canaan's extraordinary fertility and richness, confirming God's description of it as a land flowing with milk and honey. This physical demonstration was intended to build confidence and faith in God's promise, making the subsequent fear-driven rejection of the land and God's faithfulness all the more tragic and culpable.

Literary Devices

Numbers 13:26 masterfully employs several literary devices to amplify its significance and foreshadow the unfolding drama. The most prominent is Symbolism, where "the fruit of the land" transcends mere agricultural produce to become a powerful symbol of God's abundant provision, His faithfulness to His covenant promises, and the tangible reality of the blessings awaiting Israel. Its public display is designed to evoke awe and confirm divine truth. There is also a palpable sense of Narrative Tension building in this verse; it represents the calm before the storm, the moment of presentation before the conflicting reports of the spies and the ensuing national crisis of faith. The specific mention of "Kadesh" introduces a poignant Irony, as this place, whose name means "holy" or "sanctuary," will tragically become synonymous with Israel's unholy rebellion and the site of their forty-year sentence in the wilderness. Finally, the verse functions as powerful Foreshadowing, subtly hinting at the impending test of faith and the devastating consequences of unbelief that will immediately unfold following the delivery of this momentous report.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

Numbers 13:26 stands as a profound theological moment, representing the culmination of God's preparatory work and the imminent, decisive test of Israel's faith. The presentation of the fruit of the land is a divine invitation to trust in God's promises, even when faced with daunting challenges. It vividly highlights the tension between God's unwavering faithfulness and humanity's propensity for unbelief. The visible abundance of the land underscores God's boundless generosity and His fervent desire to bless His people. Yet, this tangible evidence, rather than solidifying their faith, becomes a stark backdrop against which their fear, doubt, and ultimately, rebellion, are tragically revealed. The narrative emphasizes that true faith is not merely intellectual assent to God's power, but active, courageous trust in His word and a willingness to act upon it, even when circumstances seem overwhelming. This episode serves as a foundational Old Testament example of the devastating consequences of disbelief in God's promises, a lesson frequently revisited throughout the broader biblical narrative.

  • Numbers 13:27-33 - Provides the immediate context, detailing the contrasting reports of the spies and the people's fearful, faithless reaction.
  • Numbers 14:1-10 - Describes the congregation's outright rebellion against God and Moses, contrasted with the faithful appeal of Caleb and Joshua.
  • Psalm 106:24-25 - Reflects on Israel's unbelief at this very moment, lamenting their contempt for the "pleasant land" and their refusal to trust God's word.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

Numbers 13:26 offers a powerful and enduring reminder of the critical junctures we often face when God's glorious promises intersect with the formidable reality of perceived obstacles. Just as the Israelites were presented with both the undeniable evidence of God's goodness (the abundant fruit) and the daunting reality of the challenges ahead (the fortified cities and giants in the land), we too encounter situations where God's promises seem glorious and certain, yet the path to their fulfillment appears overwhelming or fraught with danger. This verse challenges us to profoundly examine our own hearts and responses when confronted with such moments. Do we allow the tangible evidence of God's past faithfulness and the richness of His promises to anchor our hope and propel us forward, or do we permit the "giants" of our fears, perceived limitations, or external threats to dominate our perspective and paralyze our faith? Our response to these challenges reveals the true depth of our trust in God's character and His unwavering ability to fulfill His word, even when circumstances seem impossible. Furthermore, the collective nature of the report reminds us that our individual responses to God's truth can profoundly influence the faith and direction of those around us, calling us to be agents of hope, courage, and encouragement rather than doubt and despair.

Questions for Reflection

  • What "fruit" or tangible evidence of God's goodness and faithfulness have you recently witnessed in your life or in the world around you? How does this evidence encourage your faith to press forward?
  • What "giants" or overwhelming obstacles are currently standing between you and a promise or calling you believe God has given you? How are you responding to them?
  • How does your immediate reaction to challenges (fear, doubt, or faith, courage) reflect your true trust in God's power and His unwavering faithfulness to His word?
  • In what ways might your "report" or attitude—your words and actions—influence the faith of others in your family, community, or church? Are you spreading hope and confidence in God, or doubt and fear?

FAQ

Why did Moses send spies if God had already promised the land to Israel?

Answer: While God had indeed promised the land to Israel as an unconditional covenant, the decision to send spies was not an explicit divine command given as a prerequisite for entry. Deuteronomy 1:22 indicates that the idea originated with the people themselves, who approached Moses saying, "Let us send men before us to search out the land and bring us back word concerning the way by which we should go up and the cities into which we shall come." Moses, deeming the idea good, then sought and received God's approval (Numbers 13:1-2). This suggests that the mission was an accommodation to the people's desire for reassurance and strategic information, rather than a lack of faith on God's part. It was a test of their willingness to trust God even with foreknowledge of the challenges, and tragically, they failed this test, demonstrating their underlying unbelief despite God's clear promises.

What was the significance of "the fruit of the land" that the spies brought back?

Answer: The "fruit of the land," specifically a massive cluster of grapes, pomegranates, and figs (as detailed in Numbers 13:23), served as irrefutable, tangible proof of Canaan's extraordinary fertility and abundance. It visually and physically confirmed God's repeated description of the land as one "flowing with milk and honey" (Exodus 3:8). This physical evidence was meant to inspire deep faith and confidence in the Israelites, showing them that God's promise was not an empty word but a glorious, tangible reality awaiting their possession. Its impressive nature made their subsequent fear, grumbling, and unbelief all the more inexcusable, as they rejected the very evidence of God's blessing.

Why was Kadesh-barnea such an important location in this narrative?

Answer: Kadesh-barnea was a crucial oasis and a highly significant encampment site for the Israelites, serving as their final staging ground before their intended entry into the Promised Land. Its strategic location at the very edge of the wilderness and the border of Canaan made it the natural and logical place for the spies to return and deliver their report to the entire congregation. However, its importance is tragically amplified by the pivotal events that unfolded there: it became the place where Israel's profound lack of faith led to their outright rebellion against God, resulting in the divine judgment of forty years of wilderness wandering before they could finally enter the land (Numbers 14:34). Thus, Kadesh-barnea symbolizes both the threshold of divine promise and the bitter, long-lasting consequences of human unbelief and disobedience.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

Numbers 13:26, with its depiction of the spies returning with the abundant fruit of the Promised Land, powerfully foreshadows the greater reality of Christ and the spiritual inheritance He secures for His people. The physical fruit from Canaan, though impressive, was merely a type, a shadow of the ultimate spiritual blessings found in Christ. Just as the land was God's promised inheritance to Israel, so too is the heavenly inheritance, a "better country," promised to believers through Christ (Hebrews 11:16). Jesus Himself is the ultimate "fruit" of God's promise, the fulfillment of all covenant blessings. He is the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world, opening the way to true spiritual rest, unlike the physical rest in Canaan that Israel largely forfeited due to unbelief. The narrative of Israel's failure at Kadesh, highlighted in Hebrews 3 and Hebrews 4, serves as a stark warning against unbelief, urging us to enter God's rest through faith in Christ. He is the true and faithful leader, unlike the fearful spies, who has already conquered the "giants" of sin, death, and the world, securing our eternal inheritance and guaranteeing our entry into His glorious kingdom. Our faith is not in a land, but in the living Christ, who is the substance and "Yes" to all God's promises (2 Corinthians 1:20).

Copy as

Commentary on Numbers 13 verses 26–33

I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points

It is a wonder how the people of Israel had patience to stay forty days for the return of their spies, when they were just ready to enter Canaan, under all the assurances of success they could have from the divine power, and a constant series of miracles that had hitherto attended them; but they distrusted God's power and promise, and were willing to be held in suspense by their own counsels, rather than be brought to a certainty by God's covenant. How much do we stand in our own light by our unbelief! Well, at length the messengers return, but they agree not in their report.

I. The major part discourage the people from going forward to Canaan; and justly are the Israelites left to this temptation, for putting so much confidence in the judgment of men, when they had the word of God to trust to. It is a righteous thing with God to give those up to strong delusions who will not receive his truth in the love of it.

1.Observe their report. (1.) They could not deny but that the land of Canaan was a very fruitful land; the bunch of grapes they brought with them was an ocular demonstration of it, Num 13:27. God had promised them a land flowing with milk and honey, and the evil spies themselves own that it is such a land. Thus even out of the mouth of adversaries will God be glorified and the truth of his promise attested. And yet afterwards they contradict themselves, when they say (Num 13:32), It is a land that eateth up the inhabitants thereof; as if, though it had milk, and honey, and grapes, yet it wanted other necessary provision; some think that there was a great plague in the country at the time they surveyed it, which they ought to have imputed to the wisdom of the divine Providence, which thus lessened the numbers of their enemies, to facilitate their conquests; but they invidiously imputed it to the unwholesomeness of the air, and thence took occasion to disparage the country. For this unreasonable fear of a plague in Canaan, they were justly cut off immediately by a plague in the wilderness, Num 14:37. But, (2.) They represented the conquest of it as altogether impracticable, and that it was to no purpose to attempt it. The people are strong (Num 13:28), men of a great stature (Num 13:32), stronger than we, Num 13:31. The cities are represented as impregnable fortresses: they are walled and very great, Num 13:28. But nothing served their ill purpose more than a description of the giants, on whom they lay a great stress: We saw the children of Anak there (Num 13:28), and again, we saw the giants, those men of a prodigious size, the sons of Anak, who come of the giants, Num 13:33. They spoke as if they were ready to tremble at the mention of them, as they had done at the sight of them. "O these tremendous giants! when we were near them, we were in our own sight as grasshoppers, not only little and weak, but trembling and daunted." Compare Job 39:20, Canst thou make him afraid as a grasshopper? "Nay, and so we were in their sight; they looked upon us with as much scorn and disdain as we did upon them with fear and trembling." So that upon the whole matter they gave it in as their judgment, We are not able to go up against them (Num 13:31), and therefore must think of taking some other course.

2.Now, even if they had been to judge only by human probabilities, they could not have been excused from the imputation of cowardice. Were not the hosts of Israel very numerous? 600,000 effective men, well marshalled and modelled, closely embodied, and entirely united in interest and affection, constituted as formidable an army as perhaps was ever brought into the field; many a less has done more than perhaps the conquering of Canaan was, witness Alexander's army. Moses, their commander-in-chief, was wise and brave; and if the people had put on resolution, and behaved themselves valiantly, what could have stood before them? It is true the Canaanites were strong, but they were dispersed (Num 13:29): Some dwell in the south and others in the mountains; so that by reason of their distance they could not soon get together, and by reason of their divided interests they could not long keep together, to oppose Israel. The country being plentiful would subsist an army, and, though the cities were walled, if they could beat them in the field the strong-holds would fall of course into their hands. And, lastly, as for the giants, their overgrown stature would but make them the better mark, and the bulkiest men have not always the best mettle.

3.But, though they deserved to be posted for cowards, this was not the worst, the scripture brands them for unbelievers. It was not any human probabilities they were required to depend upon, but, (1.) They had the manifest and sensible tokens of God's presence with them, and the engagement of his power for them. The Canaanites were stronger than Israel; suppose they were, but were they stronger than the God of Israel? We are not able to deal with them, but is not God Almighty able? Have we not him in the midst of us? Does not he go before us? And is any thing too hard for him? Were we as grasshoppers before the giants, and are not they less than grasshoppers before God? Their cities are walled against us, but can they be walled against heaven? Besides this, (2.) They had had very great experience of the length and strength of God's arm, lifted up and made bare on their behalf. Were not the Egyptians as much stronger than they as the Canaanites were? And yet, without a sword drawn by Israel or a stroke struck, the chariots and horsemen of Egypt were quite routed and ruined; the Amalekites took them at great disadvantages, and yet they were discomfited. Miracles were at this time their daily bread; were there nothing else, an army so well victualled as theirs was, so constantly, so plentifully, and all on free cost, would have a might advantage against any other force. Nay, (3.) They had particular promises made them of victory and success in their wars against the Canaanites. God had given Abraham all possible assurances that he would put his seed into possession of that land, Gen 15:18; Gen 17:8. He had expressly promised them by Moses that he would drive out the Canaanites from before them (Exo 33:2), and that he would do it by little and little, Exo 23:30. And, after all this, for them to say, We are not able to go up against them, was in effect to say, "God himself is not able to make his words good." It was in effect to give him the lie, and to tell him he had undertaken more than he could perform. We have a short account of their sin, with which they infected the whole congregation, Psa 106:24. They despised the land, they believed not his word. Though, upon search, they had found it as good as he had said, a land flowing with milk and honey, yet they would not believe it as sure as he had said, but despaired of having it, though eternal truth itself had engaged it to them. And now this is the representation of the evil spies.

II. Caleb encouraged them to go forward, though he was seconded by Joshua only (Num 13:30): Caleb stilled the people, whom he saw already put into a ferment even before Moses himself, whose shining face could not daunt them, when they began to grow unruly. Caleb signifies all heart, and he answered his name, was hearty himself, and would have made the people so if they would have hearkened to him. If Joshua had begun to stem the tide, he would have been suspected of partiality to Moses, whose minister he was; and therefore he prudently left it to Caleb's management at first, who was of the tribe of Judah, the leading tribe, and therefore the fittest to be heard. Caleb had seen and observed the strength of the inhabitants as much as his fellows, and upon the whole matter, 1. He speaks very confidently of success: We are well able to overcome them, as strong as they are. 2. He animates the people to go on, and, his lot lying in the van, he speaks as one resolved to lead them on with bravery: "Let us go up at once, one bold step, one bold stroke more, will do our business; it is all our own if we have but courage to make it so: Let us go up and possess it." He does not say, "Let us go up and conquer it;" he looks upon that to be as good as done already; but, "Let us go up and possess it; there is nothing to be done but to enter, and take the possession which God our great Lord is ready to give us." Note, The righteous are bold as a lion. Difficulties that lie in the way of salvation dwindle and vanish before a lively active faith in the power and promise of God. All things are possible, if they be but promised, to him that believes.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 26–33. Public domain.
Copy as
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Numbers 13:26 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.