TRV
Study This Verse
Public-domain commentary
Matthew Henry
From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry comments on passages, not single verses — this entry covers Leviticus 27:1–13. His two-level outline is real structure in the source text, so it is rendered as structure.
This is part of the law concerning singular vows, extraordinary ones, which though God did not expressly insist on, yet, if they were consistent with and conformable to the general precepts, he would be well pleased with. Note, We should not only ask, What must we do, but, What may we do, for the glory and honour of God? As the liberal devises liberal things (Isa 32:8), so the pious devises pious things, and the enlarged heart would willingly do something extraordinary in the service of so good a Master as God is. When we receive or expect some singular mercy it is good to honour God with some singular vow.
I.The case is here put of persons vowed to God by a singular vow, Lev 27:2.
If a man consecrated himself, or a child, to the service of the tabernacle, to be employed there in some inferior office, as sweeping the floor, carrying out ashes, running of errands, or the like, the person so consecrated shall be for the Lord, that is, "God will graciously accept the good-will." Thou didst well that it was in thy heart, Ch2 6:8. But forasmuch as he had no occasion to use their service about the tabernacle, a whole tribe being appropriated to the use of it, those that were thus vowed were to be redeemed, and the money paid for their redemption was employed for the repair of the sanctuary, or other uses of it, as appears by Kg2 12:14, where it is called, in the margin, the money of the souls of his estimation. A book of rates is accordingly provided, by which the priests were to go in their estimation. Here is,
1.The rate of the middle-aged, between twenty and threescore, these were valued highest, because most serviceable; a male fifty shekels, and a female thirty, Lev 27:3, Lev 27:4. The females were then less esteemed, but not so in Christ; for in Christ Jesus there is neither male nor female, Gal 3:28. Note, Those that are in the prime of their time must look upon themselves as obliged to do more in the service of God and their generation than can be expected either from minors, that have not yet arrived to their usefulness, or from the aged, that have survived it.
2.The rate of the youth between five years old and twenty was less, because they were then less capable of doing service, Lev 27:5.
3.Infants under five years old were capable of being vowed to God by their parents, even before they were born, as Samuel was, but not to be presented and redeemed till a month old, that, as one sabbath passed over them before they were circumcised, so one new moon might pass over them before they were estimated; and their valuation was but small, Lev 27:6. Samuel, who was thus vowed to God, was not redeemed, because he was a Levite, and a particular favourite, and therefore was employed in his childhood in the service of the tabernacle.
4.The aged are valued less than youth, but more than children, Lev 27:7. And the Hebrews observe that the rate of an aged woman is two parts of three to that of an aged man, so that in that age the female came nearest to the value of the male, which occasioned (as bishop Patrick quotes it here) this saying among them, That an old woman in a house is a treasure in a house. Paul sets a great value upon the aged women, when he makes them teachers of good things, Tit 2:3.
5.The poor shall be valued according to their ability, Lev 27:8. Something they must pay, that they might learn not to be rash in vowing to God, for he hath no pleasure in fools, Ecc 5:4. Yet not more than their ability, but secundum tenementum - according to their possessions, that they might not ruin themselves and their families by their zeal. Note, God expects and requires from men according to what they have, and not according to what they have not, Luk 21:4.
II.The case is put of beasts vowed to God,
1.If it was a clean beast, such as was offered in sacrifice, it must not be redeemed, nor any equivalent given for it: It shall be holy, Lev 27:9, Lev 27:10. After it was vowed, it was not to be put to any common use, nor changed upon second thoughts; but it must be either offered upon the altar, or, if through any blemish it was not meet to be offered, he that vowed it should not take advantage of that, but the priests should have it for their own use (for they were God's receivers), or it should be sold for the service of the sanctuary. This teaches caution in making vows and constancy in keeping them when they are made; for it is a snare to a man to devour that which is holy, and after vows to make enquiry, Pro 20:25. And to this that rule of charity seems to allude (Co2 9:7), Every man, according as he purposeth in his heart, so let him give.
2.If it was an unclean beast, it should go to the use of the priest at such a value; but he that vowed it, upon paying that value in money, and adding a fifth part more to it, might redeem it if he pleased, Lev 27:11-13. It was fit that men should smart for their inconstancy. God has let us know his mind concerning his service, and he is not pleased if we do not know our own. God expects that those that deal with him should be at a point, and way what they will stand to.
Continue studying Leviticus 27:11 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
SefariaThe Hebrew text with Rashi and centuries of Jewish commentary.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
Summary
Leviticus 27:11 outlines the specific procedure for a vow involving an animal deemed ritually unclean, and therefore unsuitable for direct sacrificial offering to the Lord. This divine directive mandates that such an animal, despite its impurity, must still be presented before the priest. The priest's role is then to assess its monetary value, ensuring that the vow made to God is honored through an equivalent payment rather than a direct offering, thereby meticulously upholding both the sanctity of the vow and God's immutable purity standards for worship.
Context
Literary Context
Leviticus 27 serves as the concluding chapter of the book, transitioning from the detailed sacrificial laws and purity codes of the preceding chapters to regulations concerning vows and dedications. Following the comprehensive instructions on various offerings (such as those detailed in Leviticus 1-7) and purity laws (Leviticus 11-15), chapter 27 addresses how individuals could consecrate persons, animals, houses, or fields to the Lord through a vow. Verses 9-10 specifically deal with clean animals, asserting their inherent holiness and prohibiting their redemption or exchange once vowed. Leviticus 27:11-13 then provides the distinct protocol for an "unclean beast," which, unlike a clean animal, could not be offered on the altar but still required a divinely sanctioned method for its value to be consecrated to God, highlighting the meticulousness of the Law even for non-sacrificial items within a vow.
Historical & Cultural Context
In ancient Israel, vows were solemn, binding commitments made to God, often undertaken in moments of distress, thanksgiving, or deep devotion. They were considered legally and spiritually weighty, as emphasized in passages like Deuteronomy 23:21-23. The fundamental distinction between clean and unclean animals was central to Israelite religious life, profoundly influencing their dietary practices and, more significantly, their sacrificial system, as meticulously detailed in Leviticus 11. Animals designated as "unclean" were strictly prohibited for consumption and, crucially, for presentation on the altar as offerings to the Lord because they did not meet God's stringent standards of purity required for communion with a holy God. This verse, therefore, provides a practical and divinely ordained solution for a situation where a vow involved an object that, by its very nature, could not participate in the central act of Israelite worship, yet the vow itself remained sacred and necessitated fulfillment through an alternative, prescribed means.
Key Themes
Leviticus 27:11 contributes to several overarching themes within the Pentateuch. It underscores the paramount importance of Holiness and Purity in all interactions with God, reinforcing the idea that God's presence demands a separation from anything defiled. The inability to offer an unclean animal on the altar vividly illustrates God's unyielding standard for acceptable worship, where only the unblemished and pure are fitting. Furthermore, the verse highlights the theme of Integrity of Vows, demonstrating God's provision for His people to honor their commitments even when the dedicated item is unsuitable for direct sacred use. The role of the Priestly Mediation is also central, as the priest acts as the divinely appointed authority to assess value and facilitate the redemption process, ensuring that God's honor is upheld and the vow is properly discharged within the framework of the Law. This system of valuation and redemption points to God's desire for His people to honor their word while maintaining the distinct boundaries between the sacred and the common, the clean and the unclean, foundational principles throughout the Mosaic Law (Leviticus 10:10).
Exposition and Analysis
Key Word Analysis
This term (H2931) signifies something "foul in a religious sense," denoting defilement, pollution, or ritual impurity. In the context of Leviticus, an "unclean" animal was inherently unsuitable for sacred purposes, particularly for presentation as a sacrifice to the Lord, due to its categorization under the purity laws. Its state rendered it antithetical to the holiness required for divine interaction.
Derived from the primitive root (H7126) meaning "to approach" or "to bring near," this verb specifically refers to the act of presenting an offering or sacrifice to God, typically at the altar. The negative phrasing in the verse, "do not offer a sacrifice," emphasizes the absolute prohibition against bringing an unclean animal near the sacred altar in this manner, thereby reinforcing the strict boundaries of the sacrificial system and God's demand for purity in worship.
As an active participle (H3548) meaning "one officiating," a "priest" was a divinely appointed mediator and administrator of the Law in Israel. In this verse, the priest's role is crucial as the authoritative figure before whom the unclean beast must be presented. He serves as God's representative, tasked with assessing the animal's value and facilitating the fulfillment of the vow through an alternative, non-sacrificial means, ensuring the integrity of the commitment to the Lord.
Verse Breakdown
"And if [it be] any unclean beast,"
This opening clause sets the specific condition for the subsequent regulation. It immediately distinguishes the subject of the vow from the "clean" animals discussed previously, signaling that a different set of procedures will apply due to the animal's ritually impure status.
"of which they do not offer a sacrifice unto the LORD,"
This explanatory clause provides the theological rationale for the special protocol. It explicitly states the fundamental prohibition: such animals are absolutely forbidden from being presented as burnt offerings or sacrifices on the altar, underscoring the non-negotiable sanctity and purity requirements of the Israelite sacrificial system.
"then he shall present the beast before the priest:"
This final clause delivers the divine instruction for handling such a situation. Despite its unsuitability for direct sacrifice, the vowed animal is not simply dismissed. Instead, it is commanded to be brought into the presence of the priest, who, as God's appointed arbiter and representative, will determine its monetary value for redemption, ensuring that the integrity of the vow is maintained and God's honor is upheld through an alternative, divinely sanctioned means.
Literary Devices
Leviticus 27:11 primarily functions as a Legal Stipulation, providing a precise directive within the broader framework of Israelite law concerning vows. It employs Casuistic Law, presenting a specific hypothetical case ("And if [it be] any unclean beast...") and then prescribing the required action ("...then he shall present the beast before the priest"). There is an implicit Contrast established between the treatment of clean animals (Leviticus 27:9-10), which are irrevocably dedicated and cannot be redeemed, and unclean animals, which require a distinct process of valuation and redemption. This highlights the meticulousness of the Mosaic Law in addressing various contingencies while upholding the overarching principles of holiness and the sanctity of vows. The verse also demonstrates Prescription, clearly dictating the necessary behavior in a given scenario to ensure adherence to divine standards.
Theological and Thematic Connections
Leviticus 27:11 profoundly underscores several enduring theological themes. It reinforces the absolute necessity of Holiness and Purity in all matters pertaining to God, extending even to objects of vows. The inherent inability to sacrifice an "unclean beast" vividly highlights God's unyielding standard for acceptable worship, where only the pure and unblemished can approach Him. Yet, this verse also beautifully demonstrates God's provision for the Integrity of Vows, revealing a divine mechanism for fulfilling commitments even when the dedicated item is imperfect or unsuitable for direct sacred use. The Priestly Mediation is central, as the priest acts as the divinely appointed authority to assess value and facilitate the redemption, ensuring that God's honor is upheld and the vow is properly discharged. This system of valuation and redemption points to God's desire for His people to honor their commitments while maintaining the distinct boundaries between the sacred and the common, the clean and the unclean, a principle vital for Israel's covenant relationship with Yahweh.
Reflection and Application
Leviticus 27:11, though seemingly rooted in ancient ritual law, offers profound and timeless principles for our contemporary walk with God. It reveals God's meticulous attention to detail and His unwavering expectation that commitments made to Him are taken with utmost seriousness, even when the circumstances are less than ideal or the "offering" is inherently imperfect. Just as the unclean beast could not be directly sacrificed but still had to be presented and valued, so too are there aspects of our lives, our past, or our resources that may not feel "clean" or perfectly suited for direct spiritual service. Yet, God calls us to bring all of ourselves and our possessions before Him. This verse challenges us to deeply consider how we handle our vows—our promises, dedications, and commitments—to God. Are we seeking to fulfill them with integrity, even when it requires alternative means or the humble submission to spiritual guidance? It powerfully reminds us that while God demands purity in worship, He also graciously provides a way for our imperfect offerings to be brought into His divine economy, not always through direct, flawless presentation, but through a process of valuation, redemption, and faithful obedience that honors both His absolute holiness and our sincere desire to keep our word to Him.
Questions for Reflection
FAQ
What is an "unclean beast" in the context of Leviticus?
In Leviticus, an "unclean beast" refers to any animal that was ritually impure according to God's detailed laws, primarily found in Leviticus 11. These animals were strictly forbidden for consumption by Israelites and, crucially, could not be offered as sacrifices to the LORD because they did not meet the divine standards of purity required for worship and communion with a holy God. Examples include pigs, camels, rabbits, and certain birds and creeping things.
Why couldn't an unclean beast be offered as a sacrifice?
An unclean beast could not be offered as a sacrifice because the sacrificial system was designed to facilitate communion between a holy God and His covenant people. Only that which was pure, unblemished, and ritually clean was acceptable for presentation on the altar. The impurity of an unclean animal would defile the sacred space and the altar itself, violating God's holiness. The purpose of the sacrifice was to atone for sin, express devotion, or secure fellowship, and an impure offering would contradict the very essence of drawing near to a pure and holy God. This is why passages like Leviticus 22:19-20 emphasize the absolute necessity for animals to be "without blemish" for offerings.
What was the priest's role concerning the unclean beast in a vow?
The priest's role was absolutely vital. Since the unclean beast could not be offered as a sacrifice, the priest's task was to assess its monetary value, as specifically detailed in Leviticus 27:12. This valuation allowed the person who made the vow to redeem the animal by paying its assessed worth to the sanctuary treasury, often with an additional 20% surcharge if they wished to keep the animal. This ensured that the vow was honored, and its value was consecrated to the LORD, even if the dedicated item itself was unsuitable for direct altar service, thereby upholding the integrity of the vow and God's holiness.
Christ-Centered Fulfillment
Leviticus 27:11, with its stark distinction between clean and unclean animals and the absolute inability of the latter to be offered as a sacrifice, serves as a powerful foreshadowing of the singular, perfect sacrifice of Jesus Christ. The "unclean beast" that could not be presented on the altar highlights the inherent inadequacy of any earthly, imperfect offering to truly atone for sin or fully satisfy God's holy demands. Humanity, in its fallen and sinful state, is inherently "unclean" and utterly incapable of presenting an acceptable sacrifice to God on its own behalf. However, Jesus, the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world, was the spotless and blameless offering, perfectly "clean" and without blemish, fulfilling all the stringent requirements of the Law. Unlike the unclean beast whose value had to be assessed and paid to redeem it, Christ's sacrifice was not a monetary valuation but a complete, once-for-all atonement for sin, freely given through His own blood. He is our Great High Priest, not merely assessing value, but presenting Himself and, by extension, us, as perfectly acceptable before God, having purified us by His own precious blood (Hebrews 10:10-14). Thus, the limitations and provisions of the Old Covenant system, exemplified by the unclean beast, ultimately point to the boundless efficacy and perfection of Christ's redemptive work, which cleanses us from all uncleanness and enables us to draw near to a holy God.