Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
Now when all the princes, and all the people, which had entered into the covenant, heard that every one should let his manservant, and every one his maidservant, go free, that none should serve themselves of them any more, then they obeyed, and let them go.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
Now when all the princes H8269, and all the people H5971, which had entered H935 into the covenant H1285, heard H8085 that every one H376 should let his manservant H5650, and every one H376 his maidservant H8198, go H7971 free H2670, that none should serve H5647 themselves of them any more, then they obeyed H8085, and let them go H7971.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
All the leaders and all the people listened who had entered into the covenant, wherein everyone was to free his male and female slaves and not keep them in bondage any longer. They listened, and they let them go.
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
So all the officials and all the people who entered into this covenant agreed that they would free their menservants and maidservants and no longer hold them in bondage. They obeyed and released them,
Ask
American Standard Version
And all the princes and all the people obeyed, that had entered into the covenant, that every one should let his man-servant, and every one his maid-servant, go free, that none should make bondmen of them any more; they obeyed, and let them go:
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
All the princes and all the people obeyed, who had entered into the covenant, that everyone should let his male servant, and everyone his female servant, go free, that no one should make bondservants of them any more; they obeyed, and let them go:
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
Now when all the princes, and all the people which had agreed to the couenant, heard that euery one should let his seruant go free, and euery one his handmaide, and that none should serue them selues of them any more, they obeyed and let them go.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
and hearken do all the heads, and all the people who have come in to the covenant to send forth each his man-servant and each his maid-servant free, so as not to lay service on them any more, yea, they hearken, and send them away;
Ask

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

Jeremiah 34:10 captures a fleeting moment of national obedience in Judah during the Babylonian siege of Jerusalem. In response to a solemn covenant initiated by King Zedekiah, the princes and all the people, who had entered into this agreement, heard and subsequently complied with the decree to release their Hebrew manservants and maidservants. This act temporarily fulfilled the long-neglected Mosaic law concerning the liberation of fellow Israelites from servitude, demonstrating a brief, crisis-driven alignment with divine justice before their subsequent, tragic reversal.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: This verse is strategically placed within Jeremiah's prophetic messages concerning Judah's impending judgment and the Babylonian siege of Jerusalem (c. 588-587 BC). Immediately preceding it, Jeremiah 34:8-9 details King Zedekiah's initiative to form a covenant with the people of Jerusalem, proclaiming liberty for their Hebrew servants. This desperate measure was likely an attempt to appease God and avert the catastrophic outcome of the siege. Jeremiah 34:10 then records the immediate, positive response to this covenant, where the people indeed released their servants. However, the very next verse, Jeremiah 34:11, starkly reveals their swift and hypocritical reversal of this decision, showcasing the superficiality of their obedience and setting the stage for God's severe condemnation in the subsequent verses of the chapter.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: The events of Jeremiah 34 unfold during the final, tumultuous years of the Kingdom of Judah, specifically when Jerusalem was under siege by Nebuchadnezzar's Babylonian army. The covenant mentioned in this passage represents a belated and desperate attempt to comply with ancient Mosaic laws regarding the release of Hebrew servants after six years of service, as stipulated in Exodus 21:2 and Deuteronomy 15:12. This legislation was designed to prevent perpetual servitude among Israelites, ensuring that no fellow Hebrew would be enslaved indefinitely. The dire circumstances of the siege, with the city on the brink of collapse, likely prompted this act of "repentance," as the people and their leaders hoped that fulfilling this long-neglected command would prompt divine intervention and lift the siege. The cultural backdrop reveals a society where economic pressures often led to the exploitation of the poor and vulnerable, and where adherence to divine law was frequently selective, particularly when it conflicted with personal gain.
  • Key Themes: Jeremiah 34:10 contributes significantly to several overarching themes present in the book of Jeremiah and the broader prophetic tradition. The theme of covenant faithfulness is central, as the verse depicts an initial, albeit temporary, adherence to a solemn oath made before God. This highlights the divine expectation of obedience to God's commands, especially those pertaining to justice and compassion. The theme of liberty and social justice is also prominent, as the covenant's core purpose was to free those unlawfully enslaved, reflecting God's profound concern for the oppressed and vulnerable, a principle echoed throughout the Torah and the Prophets (e.g., Isaiah 58:6). Finally, the verse subtly introduces the theme of hypocrisy and superficial repentance, which becomes glaringly evident in the subsequent verses. While this verse records an act of obedience, it serves as a crucial setup for the profound failure of the people to maintain their commitment, illustrating the conditional nature of their repentance and the ultimate futility of outward acts without inward transformation.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • covenant (Hebrew, bᵉrîyth', H1285): From a root suggesting "cutting," this term refers to a compact or agreement, often made by passing between pieces of flesh, symbolizing the solemnity and binding nature of the oath. In this context, it signifies a formal, sacred agreement between King Zedekiah and the people, made before God, to release their Hebrew servants. The "cutting" imagery underscores the gravity of the oath and the severe consequences for breaking it. This was a solemn league.
  • go free (Hebrew, chophshîy', H2670): This word denotes being exempt from bondage, tax, or care; it means to be truly free or at liberty. Its use here emphasizes that the servants were not merely being transferred but were to be genuinely liberated from their state of servitude, aligning with the Mosaic law's intention for Hebrew servants. This was a proclamation of true, unburdened liberty.
  • obeyed (Hebrew, shâmaʻ', H8085): A primitive root meaning "to hear intelligently," often with the implication of attention, obedience, or consent. In this verse, it indicates that the princes and people not only heard the terms of the covenant but acted upon them. This initial "hearing and doing" stands in stark contrast to their later actions, highlighting the transient nature of their compliance rather than a deep-seated commitment.

Verse Breakdown

  • "Now when all the princes, and all the people, which had entered into the covenant, heard that every one should let his manservant, and every one his maidservant, go free": This opening clause establishes the collective subjects of the action – the nation's leadership ("princes") and the general populace ("people") – who had formally bound themselves to the covenant. It specifies the core demand of this sacred agreement: the unconditional release of both male and female Hebrew servants. The emphatic repetition of "every one" underscores the comprehensive and universal nature of the command, implying no exceptions in its application across all households.
  • "that none should serve themselves of them any more": This phrase further clarifies the profound intent and desired permanence of the release. It was not intended to be a temporary furlough, a mere change of masters, or a conditional arrangement, but a complete and lasting cessation of their forced labor and exploitation. The servants were to be truly liberated, no longer subject to the will or service of their former owners, reflecting the spirit of the Mosaic law.
  • "then they obeyed, and let [them] go.": This concluding clause describes the immediate, positive, and seemingly compliant response to the covenant. The verb "obeyed" (Hebrew: shâmaʻ) signifies that they not only heard the terms but acted upon them, demonstrating an initial adherence to their solemn agreement. The phrase "and let them go" confirms the physical act of releasing the servants from their bondage. This moment represents a brief, yet significant, window of national adherence to divine law, driven primarily by the immediate and existential threat of judgment.

Literary Devices

The verse primarily employs Narrative Progression to advance the unfolding story of Judah's final days, specifically focusing on a pivotal, albeit temporary, act of obedience. It utilizes Direct Statement to clearly articulate the actions of the princes and people, leaving no ambiguity about their initial compliance with the covenant. The repetition of "every one" functions as a form of Emphasis, underscoring the universal and comprehensive application of the covenant's demand for freedom across all households in Judah. Furthermore, the stark contrast between the initial obedience described here and the subsequent, tragic reversal in Jeremiah 34:11 creates a powerful sense of Irony and serves as a Foreshadowing of the nation's ultimate failure to genuinely repent and maintain their commitment to God's righteous standards.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

Jeremiah 34:10 powerfully illustrates the Old Testament emphasis on covenant fidelity and social justice. The Mosaic Law consistently mandated the release of Hebrew servants, reflecting God's profound heart for liberty and His opposition to perpetual servitude among His people. The act of entering into a covenant and then initially obeying it underscores the solemnity of promises made before God and the divine expectation that such commitments would be honored. However, the fleeting nature of this obedience, as revealed in the subsequent verses, highlights a deeper theological truth: true repentance and obedience must stem from a transformed heart, not merely from a desire to escape immediate consequences. God desires genuine, sustained righteousness that impacts all areas of life, not just outward conformity under duress.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

Jeremiah 34:10 serves as a poignant reminder that outward acts of obedience, however commendable in themselves, are insufficient if they do not spring from a heart truly committed to God's will. The people's initial release of their servants was, in itself, a good and righteous act, aligning with divine law. Yet, its temporary nature exposed a deeper spiritual malaise—a lack of genuine, transformative repentance and a persistent propensity to revert to self-serving behavior once the immediate pressure subsided. For us today, this challenges us to critically examine the motivations behind our own obedience. Are we merely performing religious duties or ethical acts to gain favor, avoid negative consequences, or maintain a good appearance before others? Or is our obedience a consistent and heartfelt outflow of a transformed character, deeply committed to God's justice, mercy, and faithfulness, even when it demands personal sacrifice or goes against the tide of convenience and self-interest? This verse calls us to cultivate integrity in all our commitments, especially those made before God, and to pursue a holistic righteousness that impacts every area of our lives, particularly how we treat the vulnerable and uphold principles of justice.

Questions for Reflection

  • What truly motivates my acts of obedience to God's commands? Is it genuine devotion, or a desire to escape negative consequences or gain personal advantage?
  • In what areas of my life might I be tempted to make commitments to God or others that I do not intend to keep long-term, especially when circumstances change?
  • How does my treatment of those in vulnerable or dependent positions reflect (or fail to reflect) God's heart for justice, liberty, and compassion?

FAQ

Why did the people initially obey the covenant, only to reverse their decision later?

Answer: The initial obedience described in Jeremiah 34:10 was primarily driven by the immediate and severe pressure of the Babylonian siege on Jerusalem. Facing imminent destruction and a desperate situation, King Zedekiah and the people likely hoped that by belatedly complying with a long-neglected Mosaic law concerning the release of Hebrew servants (see Exodus 21:2 and Deuteronomy 15:12), God would intervene and deliver them from their predicament. This was a pragmatic, crisis-driven response rather than a deep, heart-felt repentance rooted in genuine love for God's law or compassion for their fellow Israelites. As soon as the Babylonians temporarily lifted the siege (perhaps to confront an approaching Egyptian army, as hinted in Jeremiah 37:5), the immediate external pressure was relieved. With the threat seemingly diminished, the people quickly reverted to their old, self-serving ways, re-enslaving those they had just freed (Jeremiah 34:11). This demonstrated their profound hypocrisy and the superficiality of their "obedience," which was conditional on their circumstances rather than on a transformed heart.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

Jeremiah 34:10, though depicting a profound failure of human covenant-keeping, powerfully foreshadows the ultimate and perfect covenant fulfilled in Jesus Christ. The temporary release of servants, an act of justice that quickly dissolved due to human fickleness, highlights humanity's inherent inability to consistently uphold God's righteous standards and maintain true covenant fidelity. This broken covenant in Judah points directly to the indispensable need for a new and better covenant, one not dependent on fickle human obedience but on divine faithfulness and power. Jesus Christ is the divinely appointed mediator of this new covenant, established not by animal sacrifices or human promises, but by His perfect life, atoning death, and glorious resurrection. Where the people of Judah failed to grant lasting freedom, Christ offers true and eternal liberty from the pervasive bondage of sin and death (John 8:36). His sacrifice on the cross is the ultimate act of "letting go free," releasing all who believe from spiritual servitude and the dominion of darkness. The fleeting and conditional obedience witnessed in Jeremiah 34:10 contrasts sharply with Christ's unwavering and perfect obedience to the Father, even to the point of death on a cross (Philippians 2:8). Furthermore, the Old Testament call for justice and liberation for the oppressed, exemplified by the law concerning Hebrew servants, finds its ultimate embodiment and fulfillment in Christ's kingdom, where true righteousness and freedom will prevail for all who are in Him (Galatians 5:1).

Copy as

Commentary on Jeremiah 34 verses 8–22

I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points

We have here another prophecy upon a particular occasion, the history of which we must take notice of, as necessary to give light to the prophecy.

I. When Jerusalem was closely besieged by the Chaldean army the princes and people agreed upon a reformation in one instance, and that was concerning their servants.

1.The law of God was very express, that those of their own nation should not be held in servitude above seven years, but, after they had served one apprenticeship, they should be discharged and have their liberty; yea, though they had sold themselves into servitude for the payment of their debts, or though they were sold by the judges for the punishment of their crimes. This difference was put between their brethren and strangers, that those of other nations taken in war, or bought with money, might be held in perpetual slavery, they and theirs; but their brethren must serve but for seven years at the longest. This God calls the covenant that he had made with them when he brought them out of the land of Egypt, Jer 34:13, Jer 34:14. This was the first of the judicial laws which God gave them (Exo 21:2), and there was good reason for this law. (1.) God had put honour upon that nation, and he would have them thus to preserve the honour of it themselves and to put a difference between it and other nations. (2.) God had brought them out of slavery in Egypt, and he would have them thus to express their grateful sense of that favour, by letting those go to whom their houses were houses of bondage, as Egypt had been to their forefathers. That deliverance is therefore mentioned here (Jer 34:13) as the ground of that law. Note, God's compassions towards us should engage our compassions towards our brethren; we must release as we are released, forgive as we are forgiven, and relieve as we are relieved. And this is called a covenant; for our performance of the duty required is the condition of the continuance of the favours God has bestowed.

2.This law they and their fathers had broken. Their worldly profit swayed more with them than God's command or covenant. When their servants had lived seven years with them they understood their business, and how to apply themselves to it, better than they did when they first came to them, and therefore they would then by no means part with them, though God himself by his law had made them free: Your fathers hearkened not to me in this matter (Jer 34:14), so that from the days of their fathers they had been in this trespass; and they thought they might do it because their fathers did it, and their servants had by disuse lost the benefit of the provision God made for them; whereas against an express law, especially against an express law of God, no custom, usage, nor prescription, is to be admitted in plea. For this sin of theirs, and their fathers, God now brought them into servitude, and justly.

3.When they were besieged, and closely shut in, by the army of the Chaldeans, they, being told of their fault in this matter, immediately reformed, and let go all their servants that were entitled to their freedom by the law of God, as Pharaoh, who, when the plague was upon him, consented to let the people go, and bound themselves in a covenant to do so. (1.) The prophets faithfully admonished them concerning their sin. From them they heard that they should let their Hebrew servants go free, Jer 34:10. They might have read it themselves in the book of the law, but did not, or did not heed it, therefore the prophets told them what the law was. See what need there is of the preaching of the word; people must hear the word preached because they will not make the use they ought to make of the word written. (2.) All orders and degrees of men concurred in this reformation. The king, and the princes, and all the people, agreed to let go their servants, whatever loss or damage they might sustain by so doing. When the king and princes led in this good work the people could not for shame but follow. The example and influence of great men would go very far towards extirpating the most inveterate corruptions. (3.) They bound themselves by a solemn oath and covenant that they would do this, whereby they engaged themselves to God and one another. Note, What God has bound us to by his precept, it is good for us to bind ourselves to by our promise. This covenant was very solemn: it was made in a sacred place, made before me, in the house which is called by my name (Jer 34:15), in the special presence of God, the tokens of which, in the temple, ought to strike an awe upon them and make them very sincere in their appeals to him. It was ratified by a significant sign; they cut a calf in two, and passed between the parts thereof (Jer 34:18, Jer 34:19) with this dreadful imprecation, "Let us be in like manner cut asunder if we do not perform what we now promise." This calf was probably offered up in sacrifice to God, who was thereby made a party to the covenant. When God covenanted with Abraham, for the ratification of it, a smoking furnace and a burning lamp passed between the pieces of the sacrifice, in allusion to this federal rite, Gen 15:17. Note, In order that we may effectually oblige ourselves to our duty, it is good to alarm ourselves with the apprehensions of the terror of the wrath and curse to which we expose ourselves if we live in the contempt of it, that wrath which will cut sinners asunder (Mat 24:51), and sensible signs may be of use to make the impressions of it deep and durable, as here. (4.) They conformed themselves herein to the command of God and their covenant with him; they did let their servants go, though at this time, when the city was besieged, they could very ill spare them. Thus they did right in God's sight, Jer 34:15. Though it was their trouble that drove them to it, yet he was well pleased with it; and if they had persevered in this act of mercy to the poor, to their poor servants, it might have been a lengthening of their tranquillity, Dan 4:27.

II. When there was some hope that the siege was raised and the danger over they repented of their repentance, undid the good they had done, and forced the servants they had released into their respective services again. 1. The king of Babylon's army had now gone up from them, Jer 34:21. Pharaoh was bringing an army of Egyptians to oppose the progress of the king of Babylon's victories, upon the tidings of which the Chaldeans raised the siege for a time, as we find, Jer 37:5. They departed from Jerusalem. See how ready God was to put a stop to his judgments, upon the first instance of reformation, so slow is he to anger and so swift to show mercy. As soon as ever they let their servants go free God let them go free. 2. When they began to think themselves safe from the besiegers they made their servants come back into subjection to them, Jer 34:11, and again Jer 34:16. This was a great abuse to their servants, to whom servitude would be more irksome, after they had had some taste of the pleasures of liberty. It was a great shame to themselves that they could not keep in a good mind when they were in it. But it was especially an affront to God; in doing this they polluted his name, Jer 34:16. It was a contempt of the command he had given them, as if that were of no force at all, but they might either keep it or break it as they thought fit. It was a contempt of the covenant they had made with him, and of that wrath which they had imprecated upon themselves in case they should break that covenant. It was jesting with God almighty, as if he could be imposed upon by fallacious promises, which, when they had gained their point, they would look upon themselves no longer obliged by. it was lying to God with their mouths and flattering him with their tongues. It was likewise a contempt of the judgments of God and setting them at defiance; as if, when once the course of them was stopped a little and interrupted, they would never proceed again and the judgment would never be revived; whereas reprieves are so far from being pardons that if they be abused thus, and sinners take encouragement from them to return to sin, they are but preparatives for heavier strokes of divine vengeance.

III. For this treacherous dealing with God they are here severely threatened. Be not deceived; God is not mocked. Those that think to put a cheat upon God by a dissembled repentance, a fallacious covenant, and a partial temporary reformation, will prove in the end to have put the greatest cheat upon their own souls; for the Lord, whose name is Jealous, is a jealous God. it is here threatened, with an observable air of displeasure against them, 1. That, since they had not given liberty to their servants to go where they pleased, God would give all his judgments liberty to take their course against them without control (Jer 34:17): You have not proclaimed liberty to your servants. Though they had done it (Jer 34:10), yet they might truly be said not to have done it, because they did not stand to it, but undid it again; and factum non dicitur quod non perseverat - that is not said to be done which does not last. The righteousness that is forsaken and turned away from shall be forgotten, and not mentioned any more than if it had never been, Eze 18:24. "Therefore I will proclaim a liberty for you; I will discharge you from my service, and put you out of my protection, which those forfeit that withdraw from their allegiance. You shall have liberty to choose which of these judgments you will be cut off by, sword, famine, or pestilence;" such a liberty as was offered to David, which put him into a great strait, Sa2 24:14. Note, Those that will not be in subjection to the law of God put themselves into subjection to the wrath and curse of God. But this shows what liberty to sin really - it is but a liberty to the sorest judgments. 2. That, since they had brought their servants back into confinement in their houses, God would make them to be removed into all the kingdoms of the earth, where they should live in servitude, and, being strangers, could not expect the privileges of free-born subjects. 3. That, since they had broken the covenant which they ratified by a solemn imprecation, God would bring on them the evil which they imprecated upon themselves in case they should break it. out of their own mouth will he judge them, and so shall their doom be; the penalty of their bond shall be recovered, because they have not performed the condition; for so some read Jer 34:18, "I will make the men which have transgressed my covenant as the calf which they cut in twain; I will divide them asunder as they divided it asunder." 4. That, since they would not let go their servants out of the hands, God would deliver them into the hands of those that hated them, even the princes and nobles both of Judah and Jerusalem (of the country and of the city), the eunuchs (chamberlains, or great officers of the court), the priests, and all the people, Jer 34:19. They had all dealt treacherously with God, and therefore shall all be involved in the common ruin without exception. They shall all be given unto the hand of their enemies, that seek, not their wealth only, or their service, but their life, and they shall have what they seek; but neither shall that content them: when they have their lives they shall leave their dead bodies unburied, a loathsome spectacle to all mankind and an easy prey to the fowls and beasts, a lasting mark of ignominy being hereby fastened on them, Jer 34:20. 5. That, since they had emboldened themselves in returning to their sin, contrary to their covenant, by the retreat of the Chaldean army from them, God would therefore bring it upon them again: "They have now gone up from you, and your fright is over for the present, but I will command them to face about as they were; they shall return to this city, and take it and burn it," Jer 34:22. Note, (1.) As confidence in God is a hopeful presage of approaching deliverance, so security in sin is a sad omen of approaching destruction. (2.) When judgments are removed from a people before they have done their work, leave them, but leave them unhumbled and unreformed, it is cum animo revertendi - with a design to return; they do but retreat to come on again with so much the greater force; for when God judges he will overcome. (3.) It is just with God to disappoint those expectations of mercy which his providence had given cause for when we disappoint those expectations of duty which our professions, pretensions, and fair promises, had given cause for. If we repent of the good we had purposed, God will repent of the good he had purposed. With the froward thou will show thyself froward.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 8–22. Public domain.
Copy as
JeromeAD 420
St. Jerome, Commentary on Daniel, CHAPTER SEVEN
[Daniel 7:1] "In the first year of Belshazzar, King of Babylon, Daniel beheld a dream. And a vision of his head upon his bed. And when he wrote the dream down, he comprehended it in a few words and gave a brief summary of it, saying..." This section which we now undertake to explain, and also the subsequent section which we are going to discuss, is historically prior to the two previous sections. For this present section and that which follows it are recorded to have taken place in the first and third years of the reign of King Belshazzar (Jeremiah 39) [Jerome's citation of Jeremiah 39 seems quite pointless in this connection]. But the section which we read previously to the one just preceding this, is recorded to have taken place in the last year, indeed on the final day, of Belshaz-zar's reign. And we meet this phenomenon not only in Daniel but also in Jeremiah [cf. Jeremiah 35 and Jeremiah 34] and Ezekiel (Ezekiel 17), as we shall be able to show, if life spares us that long. But in the earlier portion of the book, the historical order has been followed, namely the events which occurred in the time of Nebuchadnezzar, and Belshazzar, and Darius or Cyrus. But in the passages now before us an account is given of various visions which were beheld on particular occasions and of which only the prophet himself was aware, and which therefore lacked any importance as signs or revelations so far as the barbarian nations were concerned. But they were written down only that a record of the things beheld might be preserved for posterity.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Jeremiah 34:10 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.