Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
That every man should let his manservant, and every man his maidservant, being an Hebrew or an Hebrewess, go free; that none should serve himself of them, to wit, of a Jew his brother.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
That every man H376 should let his manservant H5650, and every man H376 his maidservant H8198, being an Hebrew H5680 or an Hebrewess H5680, go H7971 free H2670; that none should serve H5647 himself of them, to wit, of a Jew H3064 his brother H251.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
Everyone who had a male or female slave who was Hebrew was to let him go free; none was to keep as his slave a fellow Jew.
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
that each man should free his Hebrew slaves, both male and female, and no one should hold his fellow Jew in bondage.
Ask
American Standard Version
that every man should let his man-servant, and every man his maid-servant, that is a Hebrew or a Hebrewess, go free; that none should make bondmen of them, to wit, of a Jew his brother.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
that every man should let his male servant, and every man his female servant, who is a Hebrew or a Hebrewess, go free; that no one should make bondservants of them, of a Jew his brother.
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
That euery man should let his seruant go free, and euery man his handmayde, which was an Ebrue or an Ebruesse, and that none should serue himselfe of them, to wit, of a Iewe his brother.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
to send out each his man-servant, and each his maid-servant--the Hebrew and the Hebrewess--free, so as not to lay service on them, any on a Jew his brother;
Ask

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

Jeremiah 34:9 records a pivotal divine command issued during the Babylonian siege of Jerusalem: King Zedekiah and the people of Judah were to release their Hebrew manservants and maidservants. This mandate was a desperate, albeit temporary, attempt to align with the long-neglected Mosaic Law, which stipulated the freeing of Hebrew servants after six years. The verse profoundly underscores God's unwavering demand for justice, compassion, and obedience to His covenant principles, especially concerning the vulnerable within the community, highlighting the unique kinship and covenantal responsibility among Israelites.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: Jeremiah 34 is strategically placed within the latter part of the book of Jeremiah, which details the impending fall of Jerusalem and the subsequent exile. Specifically, it immediately follows a direct prophetic word from the Lord to King Zedekiah, announcing the city's inevitable destruction by fire and Zedekiah's capture and exile to Babylon (Jeremiah 34:1-7). Our verse, Jeremiah 34:9, is part of an account detailing a solemn covenant made by Zedekiah and the people to free their Hebrew slaves, a desperate measure enacted when the Babylonian army temporarily withdrew from Jerusalem (Jeremiah 34:10-11). The narrative that follows tragically reveals the superficiality of their repentance, as the people soon re-enslaved those they had freed, leading to a severe divine judgment pronounced by Jeremiah (Jeremiah 34:12-22). This sequence starkly illustrates Judah's persistent rebellion and their profound disregard for God's righteous demands.

  • Historical & Cultural Context: The events of Jeremiah 34 unfold during the critical period of Jerusalem's final siege by Nebuchadnezzar's Babylonian forces, likely between 588 and 586 BCE. King Zedekiah, Judah's last king, faced an increasingly desperate situation as the siege intensified. In a moment of crisis, the people, including Zedekiah, entered into a solemn covenant before the Lord to release their Hebrew slaves. This act was a direct, albeit belated, attempt to comply with ancient Mosaic laws regarding Hebrew servitude, primarily outlined in Exodus 21:2-6 and Deuteronomy 15:12-18. These laws stipulated that a Hebrew servant, after six years of service, was to be set free, preventing perpetual bondage among fellow Israelites and serving as a perpetual reminder of God's liberating act in delivering Israel from Egyptian slavery. The widespread violation of these laws by Judah's elite and common people demonstrated a profound disregard for God's covenant and the well-being of their own kin, contributing significantly to the nation's moral decay and impending judgment.

  • Key Themes: Jeremiah 34:9 powerfully encapsulates several central themes prevalent in the book of Jeremiah and the broader prophetic tradition. First, it underscores the primacy of obedience to divine law, particularly those aspects pertaining to justice and human dignity. The command to free servants was not merely a suggestion but a fundamental requirement of the covenant, highlighting that true worship involves ethical conduct. Second, it reveals God's profound concern for justice and compassion towards the oppressed and vulnerable. The Mosaic Law aimed to protect the less fortunate, and Judah's failure to uphold it demonstrated a severe lack of both justice and love, a theme echoed throughout the prophets, such as in Isaiah 1:17. Third, the phrase "of a Jew his brother" emphasizes the crucial theme of brotherly responsibility and kinship within the covenant community. Exploiting a fellow Israelite was an egregious violation of the unique bond shared by God's chosen people, a bond rooted in their shared liberation from Egypt and their covenant relationship with Yahweh, as seen in Leviticus 25:42. Finally, the narrative surrounding this verse highlights the theme of covenant faithfulness and its consequences. The people's initial, albeit temporary, act of freeing the slaves was a symbolic return to covenant obligations, but their subsequent reversal demonstrated their deep-seated unfaithfulness, leading directly to the severe judgment pronounced by God in Jeremiah 34:17.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • man (Hebrew, ʼîysh', H376): This term (H376) appears twice in the verse, "every man should let his manservant, and every man his maidservant," emphasizing the individual responsibility of each Israelite household head. It signifies a male person or individual, often used to denote "each" or "every one," underscoring the universal application of the command within the community. The repetition reinforces that this was not a collective, abstract duty, but a personal obligation for every master.
  • free (Hebrew, chophshîy', H2670): Derived from the root H2670, meaning "to be exempt," this word signifies liberation from bondage, tax, or care. In this context, it specifically means to be set at liberty from servitude. It points to the desired state of the Hebrew servants—a state of freedom and exemption from further service. This term directly contrasts with the state of "serving" (H5647, ʻâbad) and highlights the core demand of the Mosaic Law to prevent perpetual slavery among Israelites.
  • brother (Hebrew, ʼâch', H251): This primitive word (H251) refers to a brother in the widest sense, encompassing literal kinship, metaphorical affinity, or resemblance. The phrase "of a Jew his brother" is profoundly significant, emphasizing the shared ethnic and covenantal identity. It underscores that the exploitation of a fellow Israelite, a "brother," was a particularly egregious offense, violating the sacred bond and mutual responsibility inherent in their relationship as God's people.

Verse Breakdown

  • "That every man should let his manservant, and every man his maidservant,": This opening clause establishes the universal scope of the command, addressing every male head of household in Judah. The repetition of "every man" stresses individual accountability for the treatment of their domestic servants, both male and female, indicating a widespread societal practice that needed immediate correction.
  • "[being] an Hebrew or an Hebrewess, go free;": This specifies the identity of the servants to be released: those who are fellow Israelites, regardless of gender. The phrase "go free" (combining the verb shâlach H7971, "to send away," with the adjective chophshîy H2670, "free") indicates a complete and unconditional liberation from their servitude. This was the specific requirement of the Mosaic Law for fellow Hebrews after six years of service, a law that had been systematically ignored.
  • "that none should serve himself of them,": This negative injunction clarifies the intent of the release: no one should continue to exploit or hold these freed individuals in any form of bondage or compelled service. The verb "serve" (H5647, ʻâbad) here implies forced labor or continued subjugation, highlighting the prohibition against re-enslavement or continued exploitation under different pretexts.
  • "[to wit], of a Jew his brother.": This concluding phrase powerfully reiterates and emphasizes the moral and covenantal gravity of the command. By identifying the servant as "a Jew his brother," the verse underscores the unique kinship and mutual responsibility that bound Israelites together. Exploiting a fellow member of the covenant community was not merely a legal transgression but a profound betrayal of familial and spiritual bonds, making the sin particularly heinous in God's eyes.

Literary Devices

Jeremiah 34:9 employs several potent literary devices to convey its message with authoritative force and moral weight. The most prominent is Legal Language, as the verse directly quotes or paraphrases a divine decree, reflecting the covenantal stipulations found in the Torah. This gives the command an authoritative and non-negotiable tone, underscoring its basis in God's established law. The Repetition of "every man" (Hebrew ʼîysh) at the beginning of the verse serves as a powerful Emphasis, highlighting the universal and individual responsibility of all slave owners within Judah to comply with God's law. This repetition ensures no one could claim exemption from the command. Furthermore, the phrase "of a Jew his brother" is a profound use of Kinship Language, which functions as a form of Ethos or moral appeal. It evokes the shared identity and mutual obligation within the covenant community, making the exploitation of a fellow Israelite a profound betrayal of family and faith, a violation of the very fabric of their chosen peoplehood. There is also an underlying Irony in the broader historical context: the people's act of freeing slaves was a desperate, last-minute attempt at repentance under duress, rather than a genuine, sustained commitment to justice, which ultimately led to their re-enslavement and further, more severe judgment.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

Jeremiah 34:9 stands as a stark reminder of God's unchanging character as a God of justice, liberation, and covenant faithfulness. It reveals that true piety is not merely ritualistic but deeply ethical, demanding compassion and equitable treatment for all, especially the vulnerable. The command to free Hebrew servants underscores the principle that human dignity is inherent and divinely endowed, not contingent on social status or economic utility. God's law sought to prevent the very exploitation that Judah practiced, demonstrating His heart for the oppressed and His desire for His people to reflect His righteousness in their societal structures. The breaking of this specific law was symptomatic of a broader spiritual malaise—a deep-seated disregard for the covenant that defined their relationship with Yahweh, leading to severe consequences. This passage highlights that God's covenant demands not only worship but also righteous living and social justice.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

The ancient command in Jeremiah 34:9, though rooted in a specific historical context of Hebrew servitude, carries timeless principles profoundly relevant for contemporary believers and society. It challenges us to examine our own lives and communities for any form of exploitation, injustice, or disregard for human dignity. This verse calls us to uphold justice in all our dealings, whether in the workplace, within our families, or in the broader societal sphere. It compels us to advocate for the marginalized, to speak out against modern forms of slavery and human trafficking, and to ensure fair labor practices. Furthermore, it reminds us that genuine faith is demonstrated not just by religious observance, but by active compassion and ethical conduct towards others, especially those under our authority or in positions of vulnerability. Our integrity and obedience to God are tested by how we treat our "neighbor" or "brother," reflecting God's own heart for justice and liberation and calling us to embody His righteousness in our daily lives.

Questions for Reflection

  • In what ways might I, or my community, be neglecting principles of justice and compassion in our daily interactions or societal structures, perhaps unknowingly?
  • How does the concept of "brotherly responsibility" (or "sisterly responsibility") within the faith community challenge me to care for fellow believers who are vulnerable or in need, extending beyond mere charity to systemic justice?
  • What specific actions can I take to advocate for justice and human dignity in my sphere of influence, reflecting God's heart for the oppressed and marginalized in today's world?
  • How does the short-lived repentance of Judah in this passage serve as a warning against superficial obedience or conditional acts of righteousness, prompting me to examine the sincerity of my own obedience to God?

FAQ

What was the Mosaic Law regarding Hebrew servants that Judah violated?

Answer: The Mosaic Law, as detailed in passages like Exodus 21:2-6 and Deuteronomy 15:12-18, stipulated that a Hebrew servant was to be set free after six years of service. If they desired to remain, they could, but otherwise, they were to be released with provisions. This law was unique to Hebrew servants, distinguishing them from foreign slaves, and was designed to prevent perpetual bondage among fellow Israelites, reflecting God's act of liberating Israel from slavery in Egypt. Judah's violation lay in their systemic failure to release their Hebrew servants after the prescribed period, holding them in perpetual servitude despite the clear divine command.

Why did the people of Judah free their servants only to re-enslave them later?

Answer: The people of Judah, including King Zedekiah, initially freed their servants as a desperate act of repentance and a last-ditch effort to appease God during the intense Babylonian siege of Jerusalem. They believed that by finally obeying this long-neglected law, God would intervene and lift the siege. Indeed, the Babylonian army temporarily withdrew, possibly to confront an Egyptian relief force. However, as soon as the immediate threat seemed to subside, their "repentance" proved superficial and self-serving. Driven by greed and a profound lack of genuine commitment to God's law, they broke their solemn covenant and re-enslaved those they had just freed, as recorded in Jeremiah 34:10-11. This act of profound covenant unfaithfulness provoked God's severe judgment, leading to the return of the Babylonians and Jerusalem's ultimate destruction.

How does Jeremiah 34:9 apply to Christians today, given that we don't have Hebrew servants?

Answer: While the specific context of Hebrew servitude is ancient, the underlying principles of Jeremiah 34:9 are timeless and universally applicable. It speaks to God's unchanging demand for justice, compassion, and ethical conduct towards all people, especially the vulnerable and marginalized. For Christians today, this verse calls us to uphold human dignity, oppose all forms of exploitation (such as modern slavery, human trafficking, and unfair labor practices), and treat those under our authority—whether employees, subordinates, or even family members—with respect and fairness. It reminds us that true faith is not merely a matter of ritual or belief, but must be demonstrated through practical acts of love, justice, and obedience to God's moral law in all spheres of life. It challenges us to live out the spirit of the law, which prioritizes the well-being and freedom of others, particularly "our brother" in the broadest sense of fellow human beings, reflecting the love of Christ.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

Jeremiah 34:9, with its emphasis on liberation, justice, and the sanctity of covenant relationships, finds profound Christ-centered fulfillment. While the Old Covenant commanded the release of physical slaves every seven years, Jesus Christ inaugurates a new and greater liberation. He is the ultimate Liberator who sets us free from the spiritual bondage of sin and death, declaring, "If the Son therefore shall make you free, ye shall be free indeed" (John 8:36). The failure of Judah to uphold the law concerning Hebrew servants underscored their inability to truly live by God's righteous standards, highlighting humanity's inherent sinfulness and desperate need for a perfect deliverer. Jesus perfectly fulfilled the law's demands (Matthew 5:17), not only by His sinless life but also by His sacrificial death, which established a new covenant of grace. In this new covenant, the distinctions of slave and free, Jew and Gentile, are transcended in Christ (Galatians 3:28), as all are called into a spiritual freedom and a new identity as children of God. Furthermore, Jesus' teachings consistently emphasized love for neighbor (Mark 12:31) and radical compassion for the oppressed and marginalized, identifying Himself with "the least of these" (Matthew 25:40). Thus, the justice and liberation demanded in Jeremiah 34:9 are not merely legalistic requirements but find their ultimate and spiritual fulfillment in the person and work of Christ, who liberates us to live in true freedom and to extend His liberating love and justice to others, embodying the very heart of God.

Copy as

Commentary on Jeremiah 34 verses 8–22

I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points

We have here another prophecy upon a particular occasion, the history of which we must take notice of, as necessary to give light to the prophecy.

I. When Jerusalem was closely besieged by the Chaldean army the princes and people agreed upon a reformation in one instance, and that was concerning their servants.

1.The law of God was very express, that those of their own nation should not be held in servitude above seven years, but, after they had served one apprenticeship, they should be discharged and have their liberty; yea, though they had sold themselves into servitude for the payment of their debts, or though they were sold by the judges for the punishment of their crimes. This difference was put between their brethren and strangers, that those of other nations taken in war, or bought with money, might be held in perpetual slavery, they and theirs; but their brethren must serve but for seven years at the longest. This God calls the covenant that he had made with them when he brought them out of the land of Egypt, Jer 34:13, Jer 34:14. This was the first of the judicial laws which God gave them (Exo 21:2), and there was good reason for this law. (1.) God had put honour upon that nation, and he would have them thus to preserve the honour of it themselves and to put a difference between it and other nations. (2.) God had brought them out of slavery in Egypt, and he would have them thus to express their grateful sense of that favour, by letting those go to whom their houses were houses of bondage, as Egypt had been to their forefathers. That deliverance is therefore mentioned here (Jer 34:13) as the ground of that law. Note, God's compassions towards us should engage our compassions towards our brethren; we must release as we are released, forgive as we are forgiven, and relieve as we are relieved. And this is called a covenant; for our performance of the duty required is the condition of the continuance of the favours God has bestowed.

2.This law they and their fathers had broken. Their worldly profit swayed more with them than God's command or covenant. When their servants had lived seven years with them they understood their business, and how to apply themselves to it, better than they did when they first came to them, and therefore they would then by no means part with them, though God himself by his law had made them free: Your fathers hearkened not to me in this matter (Jer 34:14), so that from the days of their fathers they had been in this trespass; and they thought they might do it because their fathers did it, and their servants had by disuse lost the benefit of the provision God made for them; whereas against an express law, especially against an express law of God, no custom, usage, nor prescription, is to be admitted in plea. For this sin of theirs, and their fathers, God now brought them into servitude, and justly.

3.When they were besieged, and closely shut in, by the army of the Chaldeans, they, being told of their fault in this matter, immediately reformed, and let go all their servants that were entitled to their freedom by the law of God, as Pharaoh, who, when the plague was upon him, consented to let the people go, and bound themselves in a covenant to do so. (1.) The prophets faithfully admonished them concerning their sin. From them they heard that they should let their Hebrew servants go free, Jer 34:10. They might have read it themselves in the book of the law, but did not, or did not heed it, therefore the prophets told them what the law was. See what need there is of the preaching of the word; people must hear the word preached because they will not make the use they ought to make of the word written. (2.) All orders and degrees of men concurred in this reformation. The king, and the princes, and all the people, agreed to let go their servants, whatever loss or damage they might sustain by so doing. When the king and princes led in this good work the people could not for shame but follow. The example and influence of great men would go very far towards extirpating the most inveterate corruptions. (3.) They bound themselves by a solemn oath and covenant that they would do this, whereby they engaged themselves to God and one another. Note, What God has bound us to by his precept, it is good for us to bind ourselves to by our promise. This covenant was very solemn: it was made in a sacred place, made before me, in the house which is called by my name (Jer 34:15), in the special presence of God, the tokens of which, in the temple, ought to strike an awe upon them and make them very sincere in their appeals to him. It was ratified by a significant sign; they cut a calf in two, and passed between the parts thereof (Jer 34:18, Jer 34:19) with this dreadful imprecation, "Let us be in like manner cut asunder if we do not perform what we now promise." This calf was probably offered up in sacrifice to God, who was thereby made a party to the covenant. When God covenanted with Abraham, for the ratification of it, a smoking furnace and a burning lamp passed between the pieces of the sacrifice, in allusion to this federal rite, Gen 15:17. Note, In order that we may effectually oblige ourselves to our duty, it is good to alarm ourselves with the apprehensions of the terror of the wrath and curse to which we expose ourselves if we live in the contempt of it, that wrath which will cut sinners asunder (Mat 24:51), and sensible signs may be of use to make the impressions of it deep and durable, as here. (4.) They conformed themselves herein to the command of God and their covenant with him; they did let their servants go, though at this time, when the city was besieged, they could very ill spare them. Thus they did right in God's sight, Jer 34:15. Though it was their trouble that drove them to it, yet he was well pleased with it; and if they had persevered in this act of mercy to the poor, to their poor servants, it might have been a lengthening of their tranquillity, Dan 4:27.

II. When there was some hope that the siege was raised and the danger over they repented of their repentance, undid the good they had done, and forced the servants they had released into their respective services again. 1. The king of Babylon's army had now gone up from them, Jer 34:21. Pharaoh was bringing an army of Egyptians to oppose the progress of the king of Babylon's victories, upon the tidings of which the Chaldeans raised the siege for a time, as we find, Jer 37:5. They departed from Jerusalem. See how ready God was to put a stop to his judgments, upon the first instance of reformation, so slow is he to anger and so swift to show mercy. As soon as ever they let their servants go free God let them go free. 2. When they began to think themselves safe from the besiegers they made their servants come back into subjection to them, Jer 34:11, and again Jer 34:16. This was a great abuse to their servants, to whom servitude would be more irksome, after they had had some taste of the pleasures of liberty. It was a great shame to themselves that they could not keep in a good mind when they were in it. But it was especially an affront to God; in doing this they polluted his name, Jer 34:16. It was a contempt of the command he had given them, as if that were of no force at all, but they might either keep it or break it as they thought fit. It was a contempt of the covenant they had made with him, and of that wrath which they had imprecated upon themselves in case they should break that covenant. It was jesting with God almighty, as if he could be imposed upon by fallacious promises, which, when they had gained their point, they would look upon themselves no longer obliged by. it was lying to God with their mouths and flattering him with their tongues. It was likewise a contempt of the judgments of God and setting them at defiance; as if, when once the course of them was stopped a little and interrupted, they would never proceed again and the judgment would never be revived; whereas reprieves are so far from being pardons that if they be abused thus, and sinners take encouragement from them to return to sin, they are but preparatives for heavier strokes of divine vengeance.

III. For this treacherous dealing with God they are here severely threatened. Be not deceived; God is not mocked. Those that think to put a cheat upon God by a dissembled repentance, a fallacious covenant, and a partial temporary reformation, will prove in the end to have put the greatest cheat upon their own souls; for the Lord, whose name is Jealous, is a jealous God. it is here threatened, with an observable air of displeasure against them, 1. That, since they had not given liberty to their servants to go where they pleased, God would give all his judgments liberty to take their course against them without control (Jer 34:17): You have not proclaimed liberty to your servants. Though they had done it (Jer 34:10), yet they might truly be said not to have done it, because they did not stand to it, but undid it again; and factum non dicitur quod non perseverat - that is not said to be done which does not last. The righteousness that is forsaken and turned away from shall be forgotten, and not mentioned any more than if it had never been, Eze 18:24. "Therefore I will proclaim a liberty for you; I will discharge you from my service, and put you out of my protection, which those forfeit that withdraw from their allegiance. You shall have liberty to choose which of these judgments you will be cut off by, sword, famine, or pestilence;" such a liberty as was offered to David, which put him into a great strait, Sa2 24:14. Note, Those that will not be in subjection to the law of God put themselves into subjection to the wrath and curse of God. But this shows what liberty to sin really - it is but a liberty to the sorest judgments. 2. That, since they had brought their servants back into confinement in their houses, God would make them to be removed into all the kingdoms of the earth, where they should live in servitude, and, being strangers, could not expect the privileges of free-born subjects. 3. That, since they had broken the covenant which they ratified by a solemn imprecation, God would bring on them the evil which they imprecated upon themselves in case they should break it. out of their own mouth will he judge them, and so shall their doom be; the penalty of their bond shall be recovered, because they have not performed the condition; for so some read Jer 34:18, "I will make the men which have transgressed my covenant as the calf which they cut in twain; I will divide them asunder as they divided it asunder." 4. That, since they would not let go their servants out of the hands, God would deliver them into the hands of those that hated them, even the princes and nobles both of Judah and Jerusalem (of the country and of the city), the eunuchs (chamberlains, or great officers of the court), the priests, and all the people, Jer 34:19. They had all dealt treacherously with God, and therefore shall all be involved in the common ruin without exception. They shall all be given unto the hand of their enemies, that seek, not their wealth only, or their service, but their life, and they shall have what they seek; but neither shall that content them: when they have their lives they shall leave their dead bodies unburied, a loathsome spectacle to all mankind and an easy prey to the fowls and beasts, a lasting mark of ignominy being hereby fastened on them, Jer 34:20. 5. That, since they had emboldened themselves in returning to their sin, contrary to their covenant, by the retreat of the Chaldean army from them, God would therefore bring it upon them again: "They have now gone up from you, and your fright is over for the present, but I will command them to face about as they were; they shall return to this city, and take it and burn it," Jer 34:22. Note, (1.) As confidence in God is a hopeful presage of approaching deliverance, so security in sin is a sad omen of approaching destruction. (2.) When judgments are removed from a people before they have done their work, leave them, but leave them unhumbled and unreformed, it is cum animo revertendi - with a design to return; they do but retreat to come on again with so much the greater force; for when God judges he will overcome. (3.) It is just with God to disappoint those expectations of mercy which his providence had given cause for when we disappoint those expectations of duty which our professions, pretensions, and fair promises, had given cause for. If we repent of the good we had purposed, God will repent of the good he had purposed. With the froward thou will show thyself froward.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 8–22. Public domain.
Copy as
JeromeAD 420
St. Jerome, Commentary on Daniel, CHAPTER SEVEN
[Daniel 7:1] "In the first year of Belshazzar, King of Babylon, Daniel beheld a dream. And a vision of his head upon his bed. And when he wrote the dream down, he comprehended it in a few words and gave a brief summary of it, saying..." This section which we now undertake to explain, and also the subsequent section which we are going to discuss, is historically prior to the two previous sections. For this present section and that which follows it are recorded to have taken place in the first and third years of the reign of King Belshazzar (Jeremiah 39) [Jerome's citation of Jeremiah 39 seems quite pointless in this connection]. But the section which we read previously to the one just preceding this, is recorded to have taken place in the last year, indeed on the final day, of Belshaz-zar's reign. And we meet this phenomenon not only in Daniel but also in Jeremiah [cf. Jeremiah 35 and Jeremiah 34] and Ezekiel (Ezekiel 17), as we shall be able to show, if life spares us that long. But in the earlier portion of the book, the historical order has been followed, namely the events which occurred in the time of Nebuchadnezzar, and Belshazzar, and Darius or Cyrus. But in the passages now before us an account is given of various visions which were beheld on particular occasions and of which only the prophet himself was aware, and which therefore lacked any importance as signs or revelations so far as the barbarian nations were concerned. But they were written down only that a record of the things beheld might be preserved for posterity.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Jeremiah 34:9 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.