Jeremiah 26:10

Translation
King James Version
When the princes of Judah heard these things, then they came up from the king's house unto the house of the LORD, and sat down in the entry of the new gate of the LORD'S house.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
When the princes H8269 of Judah H3063 heard H8085 these things H1697, then they came up H5927 from the king's H4428 house H1004 unto the house H1004 of the LORD H3068, and sat down H3427 in the entry H6607 of the new H2319 gate H8179 of the LORD'S H3068 house.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
When the officials of Y'hudah heard about it, they came up from the king's palace to ADONAI's house and sat at the entrance to the New Gate of ADONAI's house.
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
When the officials of Judah heard these things, they went up from the king’s palace to the house of the LORD and sat there at the entrance of the New Gate.
Ask
American Standard Version
And when the princes of Judah heard these things, they came up from the king’s house unto the house of Jehovah; and they sat in the entry of the new gate of Jehovah’s house.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
When the princes of Judah heard these things, they came up from the king’s house to the LORD’s house; and they sat in the entry of the new gate of the LORD’s house.
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
And when the princes of Iudah heard of these things, they came vp from the Kings house into the House of the Lord, and sate downe in the entrie of the new gate of the Lords House.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
And the heads of Judah hear these things, and they go up from the house of the king to the house of Jehovah, and sit in the opening of the new gate of Jehovah.
Ask
See also
Jeremiah 36:10Jeremiah 26:16Jeremiah 26:17Jeremiah 37:14Jeremiah 37:16Ezekiel 22:6Jeremiah 36:25
See on the biblical-era map
Persecution of Prophets
Persecution of Prophets View full PDF

Map © Biblica Open Bible Maps · CC BY-SA 4.0

In the KJVVerse 19,583 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

Jeremiah 26:10 captures a pivotal moment in Jeremiah's prophetic ministry, detailing the formal and authoritative response of Judah's governmental leadership to his controversial Temple prophecy. This verse unveils the intricate political and religious landscape of Jerusalem during the tumultuous reign of King Jehoiakim, as the "princes of Judah" — high-ranking officials — convened a formal assembly at the prominent New Gate of the Temple. Their deliberate ascent from the royal palace to the sacred Temple precincts signifies a critical transition from public outcry to a structured, quasi-judicial proceeding, setting the stage for the prophet's defense and illuminating the dramatic confrontation between divine truth and human authority.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: Jeremiah 26:1-9 provides the immediate narrative backdrop for this verse, detailing Jeremiah's audacious prophecy at the Temple. Under divine command, Jeremiah stands in the Temple court and delivers a stark warning: unless the people repent and obey the Lord, the Jerusalem Temple, which they sacrilegiously trusted as an inviolable charm, will be destroyed and become like Shiloh, a former sanctuary God had abandoned due to Israel's profound unfaithfulness, as previously warned in Jeremiah 7:12. This challenging message, directly confronting the people's false security, immediately incites a furious reaction from the priests, false prophets, and the general populace, who seize Jeremiah and demand his execution. Verse 10 introduces a new, powerful contingent into this volatile scene: the "princes of Judah." Upon hearing the commotion and the substance of Jeremiah's pronouncements, they arrive from the king's palace to intervene, establishing a formal hearing. This intervention shifts the narrative from a potential mob lynching to a more official, albeit still fraught, judicial process, underscoring the gravity of Jeremiah's message and its perceived implications for national security and religious order.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: This event unfolds during the precarious reign of King Jehoiakim (609-598 BC), a period characterized by profound political instability, spiritual apostasy, and the escalating threat of Babylonian imperial expansion. Judah found itself precariously positioned between the declining power of Egypt and the ascendant might of Babylon, often compelled to pay tribute to one or the other. Culturally, the Temple in Jerusalem was far more than a mere place of worship; it stood as the quintessential symbol of national identity, divine presence, and perceived invincibility, despite widespread idolatry, social injustice, and covenant disobedience. The "princes of Judah" (Hebrew: sarim) were high-ranking governmental officials, nobles, or royal advisors, wielding substantial judicial, administrative, and political authority. Their deliberate movement from the "king's house" (the royal palace, the seat of secular power) to the "house of the LORD" (the Temple complex, the spiritual and judicial center) vividly illustrates the profound intertwining of religious and political spheres in ancient Judah. Matters of national security, public order, and divine pronouncements were frequently adjudicated by these same authorities. The "new gate" likely refers to a prominent, possibly recently constructed or renovated, entrance to the Temple precincts, serving as a well-known public forum ideally suited for official gatherings or legal proceedings, lending an air of formality to the impending trial.
  • Key Themes: The arrival of the princes and their subsequent actions in this chapter profoundly contribute to several major themes woven throughout Jeremiah and the broader prophetic literature. Firstly, the scene powerfully highlights the clash between prophetic truth and human authority, demonstrating how God's uncomfortable and often counter-cultural message invariably meets resistance from established religious and political powers, a dynamic consistently observed in Jeremiah's ongoing confrontations with kings, priests, and false prophets (e.g., Jeremiah 20). Secondly, this dramatic encounter underscores the pervasive theme of false security in religious institutions, as the people's misplaced trust in the physical Temple, rather than in their covenant relationship and obedient walk with God, is directly challenged by Jeremiah's prophecy of its impending destruction, echoing the profound warnings articulated in Jeremiah 7. Finally, the intervention of the princes introduces the crucial theme of divine providence amidst human opposition, as their decision to hold a formal hearing, rather than allowing Jeremiah to be summarily executed by the enraged mob, ultimately leads to the prophet's preservation (as detailed in Jeremiah 26:16), thereby illustrating God's sovereign hand in protecting and upholding His chosen messengers, even in the face of overwhelming human hostility.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • princes (Hebrew, sar', H8269): Meaning "a head person (of any rank or class); captain, chief, general, governor, lord, prince, ruler, steward." This term denotes high-ranking officials or nobles within the Judaean government, signifying individuals of considerable authority and influence. Their presence elevates the situation from a mere public disturbance to a formal, governmental inquiry, reflecting the profound gravity with which Jeremiah's prophecy was perceived by the ruling elite.
  • heard (Hebrew, shâmaʻ', H8085): A primitive root meaning "to hear intelligently (often with implication of attention, obedience, etc.); causatively, to tell." This word implies not merely the physical act of perceiving sounds, but an attentive listening, a perception, and an understanding of the message. In this context, it suggests that the princes were not just aware of the commotion but had grasped the substance of Jeremiah's controversial "things" (H1697, dâbâr, meaning "word" or "matter"), prompting their swift and official response.
  • new (Hebrew, châdâsh', H2319): Meaning "new; fresh, new thing." This adjective describes the specific gate where the princes convened. While seemingly a simple descriptive detail, it suggests a recently constructed or renovated entrance to the Temple complex, possibly a prominent architectural feature. Its "newness" might imply it was a well-known, perhaps even celebrated, public space, making it a fitting and conspicuous location for a significant public hearing or judicial proceeding, lending an air of official gravitas to the assembly.

Verse Breakdown

  • "When the princes of Judah heard these things": This opening clause immediately establishes the key actors—the high-ranking officials of the kingdom of Judah—and their initial reaction. The "things" they heard refer to Jeremiah's radical and incendiary prophecy concerning the impending destruction of the Temple and Jerusalem, which had already incited a furious and potentially lethal reaction from the priests, false prophets, and the general populace. Their attentive hearing of these matters signifies that Jeremiah's message had resonated beyond the immediate Temple crowd, reaching the highest echelons of governmental power and demanding an official response.
  • "then they came up from the king's house unto the house of the LORD": This phrase meticulously describes the physical movement of the princes, underscoring its deliberate and formal nature. Their departure from the royal palace, the very seat of secular power and administration, and their ascent to the Temple complex, which served as both the spiritual and a significant judicial center, denotes a formal and intentional intervention. This deliberate journey highlights the profound intertwining of political and religious authority in ancient Judah and the recognition by the government that Jeremiah's prophecy was not merely a religious dispute but a matter of paramount national importance requiring official attention and adjudication.
  • "and sat down in the entry of the new gate of the LORD'S [house]": This final clause details the princes' posture and their specific location within the Temple precincts. The phrase "sat down" (Hebrew: yâshab) often carries the connotation of taking a seat of authority, particularly for the purpose of judgment, deliberation, or official assembly. The "entry of the new gate" signifies a prominent, public, and accessible location within the Temple complex, ideally suited for a formal assembly or a judicial hearing. This specific setting underscores the public nature of Jeremiah's impending trial and the authoritative context in which the prophet's fate and the validity of God's prophetic word would be formally considered.

Literary Devices

Jeremiah 26:10 employs several potent literary devices to heighten the drama and underscore the profound significance of the scene. The Setting is meticulously crafted, contrasting the "king's house" (the epicenter of political power) with the "house of the LORD" (the spiritual and religious hub). This deliberate spatial movement emphasizes the convergence of secular and sacred authority in response to Jeremiah's divinely inspired, yet politically charged, message, highlighting the holistic nature of God's covenant with Judah. The specific mention of the "new gate" adds a layer of Symbolism; while literally a physical entrance, it can metaphorically represent a new, critical phase in the unfolding crisis, a threshold where a momentous decision for Judah's future and Jeremiah's life will be made. There is a profound sense of Dramatic Irony in the princes convening and sitting in judgment at the very Temple whose imminent destruction Jeremiah has just prophesied. They are deliberating within the very institution that, according to God's word, is about to be rendered desolate due to the nation's pervasive unfaithfulness. This irony starkly underscores the spiritual blindness and misplaced confidence of the leadership and the people. Finally, the verse serves as powerful Foreshadowing, meticulously setting the stage for the formal trial of Jeremiah that will unfold in the subsequent verses, where his life hangs precariously in the balance and the fate of God's prophetic word will be determined by human decision, yet ultimately guided by divine providence.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

Jeremiah 26:10 provides a vivid and enduring illustration of the perennial confrontation between divine truth and entrenched human authority, a recurring and central theme throughout biblical history. The princes, representing the highest echelons of Judahite society and government, are compelled to respond to a prophet whose message fundamentally challenges the very foundations of their national security, religious complacency, and institutional pride. Their deliberate act of "sitting down" in judgment at the Temple's gate underscores the profound responsibility incumbent upon leadership to discern truth, especially when that truth is unpopular, inconvenient, or threatens established norms and power structures. Theologically, this scene highlights God's persistent and unwavering attempt to call His people to genuine repentance through His faithful prophets, even when His messengers face severe opposition, persecution, and the threat of death. It also subtly but powerfully reveals the inherent precariousness of human institutions, even sacred ones like the Temple, when they become objects of idolatry and misplaced trust rather than instruments of true worship, obedience, and righteousness.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

Jeremiah 26:10 offers profound and timeless lessons for believers today, particularly concerning the reception of challenging truths and the solemn responsibilities of leadership within both sacred and secular spheres. In a world often resistant to uncomfortable messages that expose sin or demand change, this verse serves as a potent reminder that genuine faith necessitates a willingness to hear, discern, and embrace God's word, even when it exposes our flaws, threatens our perceived securities, or disrupts our comfortable routines. Like the princes, we are called to weigh spiritual claims carefully and justly, not dismissing them simply because they are unpopular, demand difficult changes, or originate from unexpected sources. For those in positions of authority, whether in the church, community, or home, the scene underscores the solemn duty to seek justice and truth above all else, prioritizing divine wisdom and righteous principles over popular opinion, self-interest, or the undue pressure of factions. It challenges all believers to cultivate courage, enabling us to speak and live out God's truth with conviction, even when it invites opposition, trusting that God's ultimate purposes will prevail, just as Jeremiah's life was providentially preserved amidst the fury of his accusers.

Questions for Reflection

  • How do we respond personally and corporately when God's truth, delivered through His word or His faithful people, challenges our comfortable assumptions, institutional loyalties, or deeply held traditions?
  • What is our responsibility as individuals and as a community to discern truth, especially when it comes from unexpected or unpopular sources, and how can we cultivate a spirit of humility and open-mindedness to divine correction?
  • In what specific ways are we called to exercise courage in proclaiming or upholding God's word in our contemporary context, even when it leads to opposition, misunderstanding, or requires us to stand against the tide of popular opinion?
  • How can leaders today, within both religious and secular spheres, ensure they are truly seeking justice and truth, rather than yielding to popular pressure, personal self-interest, or the undue influence of powerful factions?

FAQ

What was the "new gate of the LORD'S house"?

Answer: The "new gate of the LORD'S house" (H2319, châdâsh, "new"; H8179, shaʻar, "gate"; H3068, Yᵉhôvâh, "LORD"; H1004, bayith, "house") was likely a recently constructed or significantly renovated entrance to the Temple complex in Jerusalem. While its precise historical and archaeological identification remains a subject of scholarly debate, it was undoubtedly a prominent and well-known public space within the Temple precincts. Some commentators suggest it might be identified with the "Upper Gate" mentioned in Jeremiah 20:2, which was famously built by King Jotham (2 Kings 15:35). Its significance in Jeremiah 26:10 lies in its function as a suitable and public venue for official gatherings, legal proceedings, or public pronouncements, making it an ideal and conspicuous location for the princes to convene their formal hearing regarding Jeremiah's controversial and inflammatory prophecy.

Why did the princes come from the "king's house" to the "house of the LORD"?

Answer: This deliberate movement signifies a critical shift in the locus of authority and the nature of the proceedings concerning Jeremiah. The "king's house" (H4428, melek, "king"; H1004, bayith, "house") represents the royal palace, which served as the undisputed center of secular governmental power, administration, and judicial authority in Judah. The "house of the LORD" (H1004, bayith, "house"; H3068, Yᵉhôvâh, "LORD") refers to the Temple complex, which was not only the spiritual and religious heart of the nation but also functioned as a significant public and judicial forum where important matters were often deliberated. The princes, as high-ranking officials and judges, were responding to the immense public outcry and the fervent demand for Jeremiah's death (as seen in Jeremiah 26:8). Their presence at the Temple indicated a formal inquiry or trial, acknowledging the profound gravity of the prophet's message and the public uproar it had caused. This action vividly highlights the deep intertwining of religious and political authority in ancient Judah, where matters of national security, public order, and divine pronouncements often necessitated the direct intervention and adjudication of both spheres.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

Jeremiah 26:10, with its vivid depiction of a prophet facing judgment before the highest authorities at the very gates of the Temple, finds profound and resonant Christ-centered fulfillment in the life, ministry, and ultimate sacrifice of Jesus Christ. Like Jeremiah, Jesus was a prophet who fearlessly spoke uncomfortable truths, challenging the entrenched religious and political establishments of His day. He, too, boldly prophesied the destruction of the Temple (Matthew 24:1-2), a message that directly threatened the false security and institutional pride of His contemporaries, mirroring the outrage Jeremiah provoked. Just as the princes of Judah "came up from the king's house unto the house of the LORD" to sit in judgment over Jeremiah, so too did the religious and Roman authorities convene to judge Jesus, moving between the Temple precincts, the Sanhedrin's chambers, and Pilate's praetorium (John 18:28-32). Both prophets faced accusations of sedition and blasphemy for their unwavering faithfulness to God's word. However, while Jeremiah was ultimately spared by the princes through divine providence, Jesus, the ultimate Prophet and the Lamb of God, willingly submitted to the unjust judgment, allowing Himself to be condemned and crucified for the sins of the world (Isaiah 53:7). His subsequent "sitting down" at the right hand of the Father after His resurrection and ascension (Hebrews 1:3) signifies His ultimate authority and triumph, not as one judged, but as the supreme Judge of all, establishing a new covenant not based on a physical temple but on His own resurrected body and the indwelling Spirit (John 2:19-21). Thus, Jeremiah's trial serves as a powerful foreshadowing of the greater trial of the one who would truly fulfill all prophecy, bringing eternal salvation through His suffering, death, and glorious exaltation.

Copy as

Commentary on Jeremiah 26 verses 7–15

One would have hoped that such a sermon as that in the foregoing verses, so plain and practical, so rational and pathetic, and delivered in God's name, would work upon even this people, especially meeting them now at their devotions, and would prevail with them to repent and reform; but, instead of awakening their convictions, it did but exasperate their corruptions, as appears by this account of the effect of it.

I. Jeremiah is charged with it as a crime that he had preached such a sermon, and is apprehended for it as a criminal. The priests, and false prophets, and people, heard him speak these words, Jer 26:7. They had patience, it seems, to hear him out, did not disturb him when he was preaching, nor give him any interruption till he had made an end of speaking all that the Lord commanded him to speak, Jer 26:8. So far they dealt more fairly with him than some of the persecutors of God's ministers have done; they let him say all he had to say, and yet perhaps with a bad design, in hopes to have something worse yet to lay to his charge; but, having no worse, this shall suffice to ground an indictment upon: He hath said, This house shall be like Shiloh, Jer 26:9. See how unfair they are in representing his words. He had said, in God's name, If you will not hearken to me, then will I make this house like Shiloh; but they leave out God's hand in the desolation (I will make it so) and their own hand in it in not hearkening to the voice of God, and charge it upon him that he blasphemed this holy place, the crime charged both on our Lord Jesus and on Stephen: He said, This house shall be like Shiloh. Well might he complain, as David does (Psa 56:5), Every day they wrest my words; and we must not think it strange if we, and what we say and do, be thus misrepresented. When the accusation was so weakly grounded, no marvel that the sentence passed upon it was unjust: Thou shalt surely die. What he had said agreed with what God had said when he took possession of the temple (Kg1 9:6-8), If you shall at all turn from following after me, then this house shall be abandoned; and yet he is condemned to die for saying it. It is not out of any concern for the honour of the temple that they appear thus warm, but because they are resolved not to part with their sins, in which they flatter themselves with a conceit that the temple of the Lord will protect them; therefore, right or wrong, Thou shalt surely die. This outcry of the priests and prophets raised the mob, and all the people were gathered together against Jeremiah in a popular tumult, ready to pull him to pieces, were gathered about him (so some read it); they flocked together, some crying one thing and some another. The people that were at first present were hot against him (v. 8), but their clamours drew more together, only to see what the matter was.

II. He is arraigned and indicted for it before the highest court of judicature they had. Here, 1. The princes of Judah were his judges, Jer 26:10. Those that filled the thrones of judgment, the thrones of the house of David, the elders of Israel, they, hearing of this tumult in the temple, came up from the king's house, where they usually sat near the court, to the house of the Lord, to enquire into this matter, and to see that nothing was done disorderly. They sat down in the entry of the new gate of the Lord's house, and held a court, as it were, by a special commission of Oyer and Terminer. 2. The priests and prophets were his prosecutors and accusers, and were violently set against him. They appealed to the princes, and to all the people, to the court and the jury, whether this man were not worthy to die, Jer 26:11. The corrupt priests and counterfeit prophets have always been the most bitter enemies of the prophets of the Lord; they had ends of their own to serve, which they thought such preaching as this would be an obstruction to. When Jeremiah prophesied in the house of the king concerning the fall of the royal family (Jer 22:1, etc.), the court, though very corrupt, bore it patiently, and we do not find that they persecuted him for it; but when he comes into the house of the Lord, and touches the copyhold of the priests, and contradicts the lies and flatteries of the false prophets, then he is adjudged worthy to die. For the prophets prophesied falsely, and the priests bore rule by their means, Jer 5:31. Observe, When Jeremiah is indicted before the princes the stress of his accusation is laid upon what he said concerning the city, because they thought the princes would be most concerned about that. But concerning the words spoken they appeal to the people, "You have heard what he hath said; let it be given in evidence."

III. Jeremiah makes his defence before the princes and the people. He does not go about to deny the words, nor to diminish aught from them; what he has said he will stand to, though it cost him his life; he owns that he had prophesied against this house and this city, but, 1. He asserts that he did this by good authority, not maliciously nor seditiously, not out of any ill-will to his country nor any disaffection to the government in church or state, but, The Lord sent me to prophesy thus: so he begins his apology (Jer 26:12), and so he concludes it, for this is that which he resolves to abide by as sufficient to bear him out (Jer 26:15): Of a truth the Lord hath sent me unto you, to speak all these words. As long as ministers keep closely to the instructions they have from heaven they need not fear the opposition they may meet with from hell or earth. He pleads that he is but a messenger, and, if he faithfully deliver his message, he must bear no blame; but he is a messenger from the Lord, to whom they were accountable as well as he, and therefore might demand regard. If he speak but what God appointed him to speak, he is under the divine protection, and whatever affront they offer to the ambassador will be resented by the Prince that sent him. 2. He shows them that he did it with a good design, and that it was their fault if they did not make a good use of it. It was said, not by way of fatal sentence, but of fair warning; if they would take the warning, they might prevent the execution of the sentence, Jer 26:13. Shall I take it ill of a man that tells me of my danger, while I have an opportunity of avoiding it, and not rather return him thanks for it, as the greatest kindness he could do me? "I have indeed (says Jeremiah) prophesied against this city; but, if you will now amend your ways and your doings, the threatened ruin shall be prevented, which was the thing I aimed at in giving you the warning." Those are very unjust who complain of ministers for preaching hell and damnation, when it is only to keep them from that place of torment and to bring them to heaven and salvation. 3. He therefore warns them of their danger if they proceed against him (Jer 26:14): "As for me, the matter is not great what become of me; behold, I am in your hand; you know I am; I neither have any power, nor can make any interest, to oppose you, nor is it so much my concern to save my own life: do with me as seems meet unto you; if I be led to the slaughter, it shall be as a lamb." Note, It becomes God's ministers, that are warm in preaching, to be calm in suffering and to behave submissively to the powers that are over them, though they be persecuting powers. But, for themselves, he tells them that it is at their peril if they put him to death: You shall surely bring innocent blood upon yourselves, Jer 26:15. They might think that killing the prophet would help to defeat the prophecy, but they would prove wretchedly deceived; it would but add to their guilt and aggravate their ruin. Their own consciences could not but tell them that, if Jeremiah was (as certainly he was) sent of God to bring them this message, it was at their utmost peril if they treated him for it as a malefactor. Those that persecute God's ministers hurt not them so much as themselves.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 7–15. Public domain.
Copy as
JeromeAD 420
Commentary on Jeremiah
(Verse 10) And all the people gathered against Jeremiah in the house of the Lord, and the leaders of Judah heard these words and came from the king's house to the house of the Lord, and sat at the entrance of the Lord's gate (Vulgate: house of the Lord) new. Jeremiah was prophesying in the temple of the Lord, and he had said: I will make this house like Shiloh, and I will make this city a curse to all the nations of the earth. And immediately, a sedition arose among the priests and prophets and the people, and the entire crowd gathered against the Prophet in the Temple, where the Prophet and the priests and prophets and the people were held by force. When the leaders of the city, who were staying in the royal house, heard this, they crossed over or went up from the king's house to the house of the Lord. And it should be noted that going to the house of the Lord was always an ascent. And they sat at the entrance of the new gate of the Lord. For it was the duty of the princes to sit at the gate of the house of the Lord, and there to discern the truth of matters and seditions. And the gate was called new because those who sat in it and presided over judgment resisted the slander of the priests and false prophets.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Jeremiah 26:10 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

Read & Compare

Commentaries

Original Language & Research

Sermons, Hymns & Audio

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.