Jeremiah 3:11
“Judah’s Failure to Learn from Israel”Jeremiah 3:6–11
Bible text: King James Version (1769 Blayney text) · Public domain
Bible text: King James Version with Strong's numbers · Public domain
Bible text: Berean Standard Bible · Public domain
Bible text: American Standard Version (1901) · Public domain
Bible text: World English Bible, Messianic edition · Public domain
Bible text: Geneva Bible (1599) · Public domain
Bible text: Young's Literal Translation · Public domain
- וַיֹּאמֶרvai·Yo·merand he saidH559Conj-w ¦ V-Qal-ConsecImperf-3msVerb Qal Consecutive Imperfect 3rd Singular Masculineוַandיֹּאמֶרhe said
- יְהוָהYah·wehYahwehH3068N-properNoun Proper Title
- אֵלַי'e·Laito meH413Prep ¦ 1csPreposition Definiteאֵלַtoיme
- צִדְּקָהtzi·de·Kahshe has made appear righteousH6663V-Piel-Perf-3fsVerb Piel Perfect 3rd Singular Feminine
- נַפְשָׁהּnaf·Shahher selfH5315N-fsc ¦ 3fsNoun Singular Feminine Construct with suffixנַפְשָׁselfהּher
- מְשֻׁבָהme·shu·Vah[the] apostate oneH4878N-fsNoun Singular Feminine Absolute
- יִשְׂרָאֵלYis·ra·'ElIsraelH3478N-properNoun Proper Location
- מִבֹּגֵדָהmi·bo·ge·Dahmore than [the] treacherous [one]H898Prep-m ¦ V-Qal-Prtcpl-fsVerb Qal Participle Singular Feminine Absoluteמִmore thanבֹּגֵדָה[the] treacherous [one]
- יְהוּדָהye·hu·DahJudahH3063N-properNoun Proper Location
English is a literal word-by-word gloss of the Hebrew, not the KJV's wording. Why?
This is the original text the KJV's translators worked from — each Hebrew word with its own literal English meaning in this verse, prepared by scholars at Tyndale House, Cambridge. The KJV translates whole sentences, not word by word, so its wording differs: one Hebrew word can become several English words, and the KJV may choose “the LORD” where the gloss reads “Yahweh”. Both are faithful — they answer different questions. For the KJV's own rendering, switch to the KJV text.
Words in [ ] are added by the English.
- justified (KJV) / more righteous (BSB) צָדַק
Details
Study this verse
Public-domain commentary
Matthew Henry
From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry wrote on whole passages, and this entry covers Jeremiah 3:6–11. He set out his notes in a two-level outline, kept here as he numbered it.
The date of this sermon must be observed, in order to the right understanding of it; it was in the days of Josiah, who set on foot a blessed work of reformation, in which he was hearty, but the people were not sincere in their compliance with it; to reprove them for that, and warn them of the consequences of their hypocrisy, is the scope of that which God here said to the prophet, and which he delivered to them. The case of the two kingdoms of Israel and Judah is here compared, the ten tribes that revolted from the throne of David and the temple of Jerusalem and the two tribes that adhered to both. The distinct history of those two kingdoms we have in the two books of the Kings, and here we have an abstract of both, as far as relates to this matter.
I.Here is a short account of Israel, the ten tribes.
Perhaps the prophet had been just reading the history of that kingdom when God came to him, and said, Hast thou seen what backsliding Israel has done? Jeremiah 3:6. For he could not see it otherwise than in history, they having been carried into captivity long before he was born. But what we read in the histories of scripture should instruct us and affect us, as if we ourselves had been eye-witnesses of it. She is called backsliding Israel because that kingdom was first founded in an apostasy from the divine institutions, both in church and state. Now he had seen concerning them,
1.That they were wretchedly addicted to idolatry. They had played the harlot upon every high mountain and under every green tree (Jeremiah 3:6), that is, they had worshipped other gods in their high places and groves; and no marvel, when from the first they had worshipped God by the images of the golden calves at Dan and Bethel. The way of idolatry is down-hill: those that are in love with images, and will have them, soon become in love with other gods, and will have them too; for how should those stick at the breach of the first commandment who make no conscience of the second?
2.That God by his prophets had invited and encouraged them to repent and reform (Jeremiah 3:7): "After she had done all these things, for which she might justly have been abandoned, yet I said unto her, Turn thou unto me and I will receive thee." Though they had forsaken both the house of David and the house of Aaron, who both had their authority jure divino - from God, without dispute, yet God sent his prophets among them, to call them to return to him, to the worship of him only, not insisting so much as one would have expected upon their return to the house of David, but pressing their return to the house of Aaron. We read not that Elijah, that great reformer, ever mentioned their return to the house of David, while he was anxious for their return to the faithful service of the true God according as they had it among them. It is serious piety that God stands upon more than even his own rituals.
3.That, notwithstanding this, they had persisted in their idolatries: But she returned not, and God saw it; he took notice of it, and was much displeased with it, Jeremiah 3:7, Jeremiah 3:8. Note, God keeps account, whether we do or no, how often he has called to us to turn to him and we have refused.
4.That he had therefore cast them off, and given them up into the hands of their enemies (Jeremiah 3:8): When I saw (so it may be read) that for all the actions wherein she had committed adultery I must dismiss her, I gave her a bill of divorce. God divorced them when he threw them out of his protection and left them an easy prey to any that would lay hands on them, when he scattered all their synagogues and the schools of the prophets and excluded them from laying any further claim to the covenant made with their fathers. Note, Those will justly be divorced from God that join themselves to such as are rivals with him. For proof of this go and see what God did to Israel.
II.Let us now see what was the case of Judah, the kingdom of the two tribes.
She is called treacherous sister Judah, a sister because descended from the same common stock, Abraham and Jacob; but, as Israel had the character of a backslider, So Judah is called treacherous, because, though she professed to keep close to God when Israel had backslidden (she adhered to the kings and priests that were of God's own appointing, and did not withdraw from her allegiance, so that it was expected she should deal faithfully), yet she proved treacherous, and false, and unfaithful to her professions and promises. Note, The treachery of those who pretend to cleave to God will be reckoned for, as well as the apostasy of those who openly revolt from him. Judah saw what Israel did, and what came of it, and should have taken warning. Israel's captivity was intended for Judah's admonition; but it had not the designed effect. Judah feared not, but thought herself safe because she had Levites to be her priests and sons of David to be her kings. Note, It is an evidence of great stupidity and security when we are not awakened to a holy fear by the judgments of God upon others. It is here charged on Judah,
1.That when they had a wicked king that debauched them they heartily concurred with him in his debaucheries. Judah was forward enough to play the harlot, to worship any idol that was introduced among them and to join in any idolatrous usage; so that through the lightness (or, as some read it, the vileness and baseness) of her whoredom, or (as the margin reads it) by the fame and report of her whoredom, her notorious whoredom, for which she had become infamous, she defiled the land, and made it an abomination to God; for she committed adultery with stones and stocks, with the basest idols, those made of wood and stone. In the reigns of Manasseh and Amon, when they were disposed to idolatry, the people were so too, and all the country was corrupted with it, and none feared the ruin which Israel by this means had brought upon themselves.
2.That when they had a good king, that reformed them, they did not heartily concur with him in the reformation. This was the present case. God tried whether they would be good in a good reign, but the evil disposition was still the same: They returned not to me with their whole heart, but feignedly, Jeremiah 3:10. Josiah went further in destroying idolatry than the best of his predecessors had done, and for his own part he turned to the Lord with all his heart and with all his soul; so it is said of him, 2 Kings 23:25. The people were forced to an external compliance with him, and joined with him in keeping a very solemn passover and in renewing their covenants with God (2 Chronicles 34:32, 2 Chronicles 35:17); but they were not sincere in it, nor were their hearts right with God. For this reason God at that very time said, I will remove Judah out of my sight, as I removed Israel (2 Kings 23:27), because Judah was not removed from their sin by the sight of Israel's removal from their land. Hypocritical and ineffectual reformations bode ill to a people. We deceive ourselves if we think to deceive God by a feigned return to him. I know no religion without sincerity.
III.The case of these sister kingdoms is compared, and judgment given upon the comparison, that of the two Judah was the worse (Jeremiah 3:11):
Israel has justified herself more than Judah, that is, she is not so bad as Judah is. This comparative justification will stand Israel in little stead; what will it avail us to say, We are not so bad as others, when yet we are not really good ourselves? But it will serve as an aggravation of the sin of Judah, which was in two respects worse than that of Israel: - 1. More was expected from Judah than from Israel; so that Judah dealt treacherously, they vilified a more sacred profession, and falsified a more solemn promise, than Israel did. 2. Judah might have taken warning by the ruin of Israel for their idolatry, and would not. God's judgments upon others, if they be not means of our reformation, will help to aggravate our destruction. The prophet Ezekiel (Ezekiel 23:11) makes the same comparison between Jerusalem and Samaria that this prophet here makes between Judah and Israel, nay, and (Ezekiel 16:48) between Jerusalem and Sodom, and Jerusalem is made the worst of the three.
Historical interpretation
Historical reception
1 surviving comment on this verse from the historical church.
(Verse 11.) And the Lord said to me: He has justified his soul, the one who turned away from Israel, by the comparison of the one who acted treacherously in Judah. Israel is more just, he said, in comparison to Judah: because she perished immediately in the beginning, while the other could be corrected by her sufferings. Let us observe that the new heresy is compared to the old, in which Israel is said to be justified in comparison to Judah. And it is not surprising that the name of justice is attributed to one sister of a nation, when even Sodom receives the name of justice in comparison to Jerusalem, as the Lord says through Ezekiel: Sodom has been justified by you (Ezek. 16:55): and the tax collector becomes just by comparison to the Pharisee (Luke 18).
Continue studying Jeremiah 3:11 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
- BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
- Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
- ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
- NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
- STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
- BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
- USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
- BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
- StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
- BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
- Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
- Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
- Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
- SefariaThe Hebrew text with Rashi and centuries of Jewish commentary.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
Written with AI assistance. Always check it against Scripture.
This verse
The LORD’s verdict is that backsliding Israel is less guilty than treacherous Judah, because Judah sinned with her sister’s judgment in full view.
“And the LORD said unto me,”
The verdict that follows is revealed by God, and Jeremiah delivers it as his messenger.
“The backsliding Israel hath justified herself more than”
Tsâdaq, to be in the right, said in comparison and with irony. Israel is guilty, and Judah’s guilt is heavier.
“treacherous Judah.”
Here the word is the verb bâgad, to deal treacherously. Judah still stood in Jeremiah’s day, with her own judgment drawing near.
Passage studyJeremiah 3:6–11
Judah Saw Israel’s Fall and Did Not Turn
Summary
The LORD speaks to Jeremiah in the days of King Josiah and sets two sisters side by side. The northern kingdom of Israel went after idols on every hill, refused God’s call to turn back, and was sent away with a bill of divorce. Judah watched all of it, took up the same idolatry, and then came back to God only in pretence. So the LORD gives a startling verdict: backsliding Israel is the less guilty of the two. These six verses teach that God calls even the worst offender to return, that he weighs what we have seen and known, and that he wants the whole heart.
What Israel did on every high mountain
This word came to Jeremiah “in the days of Josiah the king”, who reigned from 640 to 609 BC. Josiah’s reign was a time of earnest and wide religious reform in Judah (2 Kings 22–23), so the message arrives while the nation looks as if it is coming back to God. The one who speaks is the LORD, the covenant God of Israel, who made himself known to Moses as I AM (Exodus 3:14).
He begins by pointing Jeremiah to the past. The northern kingdom of Israel, often called Ephraim, had been conquered and carried into exile by Assyria in 722 BC. “Hast thou seen that which backsliding Israel hath done?” is a question asked to set plain facts before Jeremiah and, through him, before Judah. There is grief in it as well as accusation, the grief of a God whose people have kept turning from him.
“Backsliding” is the Hebrew mᵉshûwbâh, a turning away, an apostasy. It comes from the root that means to turn back, and in Jeremiah it describes a settled pattern, a people who turn from God again and again and refuse his calls to return. God uses it here almost as Israel’s name, in verses 6, 8 and 11.
Israel “is gone up upon every high mountain and under every green tree”. The word for high, gâbôahh, is the ordinary word for something tall or lofty, and here it describes the hills themselves. Elsewhere it can describe a proud person, which suits people who set their own will above God. Hills and leafy trees were the usual sites of Canaanite fertility worship. High ground was thought to be nearer the gods, so altars to Baal were built there, and green trees and groves were tied to Asherah, a Canaanite goddess of fertility, whose poles stood beside the altars. The law had told Israel to destroy every such place (Deuteronomy 12:2–4). The word “every” is said of the mountains and of the trees alike, and it shows idolatry carried on openly across the whole land.
Why idolatry is called playing the harlot
The verb is zânâh, to commit fornication or play the harlot, and the prophets use it again and again for the worship of other gods. The picture rests on the covenant God made with Israel at Sinai (Exodus 20), which Scripture describes as a marriage. The LORD is the faithful husband who chose and redeemed his people, and Israel owed him the exclusive loyalty a wife owes her husband. To worship Baal or Asherah was therefore adultery against him, a personal betrayal of the one who loved her, and a far graver thing than a mistake in ritual.
Other prophets speak the same way. Hosea describes Israel as a wife running after her lovers (Hosea 2:5), and God told Hosea to marry a harlot so that his own marriage would be a living parable of Israel’s unfaithfulness (Hosea 1:2). Ezekiel portrays Jerusalem as a wife who turned the gifts of her husband into the means of her harlotry (Ezekiel 16:15–19) and calls her an adulterous wife (Ezekiel 16:32). The law had warned Israel beforehand against making a covenant with the inhabitants of the land (Exodus 34:15–16). The image was all the sharper because the rites at these hill shrines often included prostitution.
“Turn thou unto me”: the call Israel refused
Verse 7 looks back to the years before the Assyrian exile. “After she had done all these things”, God said to Israel, “Turn thou unto me.” He made the offer when the idolatry was already complete, which shows how patient he is and how much he prefers reconciliation to judgment. He takes no pleasure in the death of the wicked and wants them to turn and live (Ezekiel 33:11), and through Hosea he shows how unwilling he was to give Israel up (Hosea 11:8).
The verb is shûwb, to turn back or return. It is the Old Testament’s great word for repentance, a turning from sin back to God, and the same verb stands behind both “Turn” and “returned” in this verse. God said “Turn”, and the answer is given in the short clause “But she returned not.” The name “backsliding” comes from this same root, so Israel is the nation that turned away and refused to turn back.
The call is the more striking after the verses just before it. Jeremiah 3:1–5 recalls the law under which a divorced wife who had gone to another man could never go back to her first husband (Deuteronomy 24:1–4). God, the wronged husband, calls his unfaithful people back all the same.
The bill of divorce God gave Israel
“And I saw”, God says in verse 8. He had watched everything Israel did, and his judgment answered it. He put her away “for all the causes whereby backsliding Israel committed adultery”. The word for causes, ʼôwdôwth, comes from a root that suggests turnings, and it means the occasions or reasons for a thing. Israel’s exile came as the result of many acts of unfaithfulness added together, so the sentence was fully earned.
The “bill of divorce” (kᵉrîythûwth) was a legal document every Israelite knew. Under the law a husband who put away his wife gave her this written bill, and the marriage was ended (Deuteronomy 24:1–4). God uses the practice to describe what he did to the northern kingdom. After Solomon, around 931 BC, the nation had split in two, and the northern kingdom lived through generations of idolatry and unstable rule until Assyria conquered it in 722 BC. That conquest and exile was the putting away. Israel lost her place in the promised land and was scattered among the nations, and it showed that even God’s chosen people answer for breaking his covenant.
The sister who watched it happen
From the end of verse 7 the passage turns to Judah, the southern kingdom, which was still standing in Jeremiah’s day. She is Israel’s “sister”, ʼâchôwth, the ordinary Hebrew word for a sister. The two kingdoms were descended from Jacob and stood in the same covenant with the LORD.
Judah is given a name of her own, “treacherous”. The Hebrew bâgôwd comes from the verb bâgad, to deal treacherously or faithlessly, and it speaks of a breach of trust inside a close bond. The phrase “her treacherous sister Judah” stands in verses 7, 8 and 10, and verse 11 calls her “treacherous Judah”.
“And her treacherous sister Judah saw it.” The verb râʼâh is the common word for seeing, and it also covers perceiving and taking heed. Judah had Israel’s idolatry and Israel’s exile in front of her as a plain lesson, so she sinned with knowledge. Verse 8 gives her response: she “feared not, but went and played the harlot also.” The reverent fear of God that her sister’s fate should have produced was missing, and the verb for her harlotry is the same zânâh used of Israel in verse 6.
What “the lightness of her whoredom” means
Verse 9 describes the manner of Judah’s sin. The word translated “lightness” is qôwl, which ordinarily means a voice or sound, and here it carries the sense of something done easily and treated as trivial. “Whoredom” is zᵉnûwth, from the root for fornication, the prophets’ word for idolatry as unfaithfulness to God. Together they describe a people who betrayed their God casually and openly and felt little shame about it. Jeremiah laments the same shamelessness in Jeremiah 6:15.
Stones and stocks
Judah “committed adultery with stones and with stocks”, that is, with idols of stone and wood. The words point to the stone pillars and wooden poles set up for Baal and Asherah on the high places, and naming the idols by their materials shows how lifeless they were. Judah left the living God for objects cut from a quarry and a tree. Paul describes the same exchange when he writes of people who gave up the glory of God for images (Romans 1:22–23). The worship of these gods often brought with it ritual prostitution and the sacrifice of children, which the law of Moses forbade.
How sin defiles a land
“She defiled the land.” The verb chânêph means to soil, especially in a moral sense, and so to pollute or profane. The land of Canaan was God’s gift to his people and the place of his presence, and Scripture teaches that idolatry, bloodshed and sexual sin make it unclean. A defiled land vomits out its inhabitants (Leviticus 18:25), blood pollutes the land where it is shed (Numbers 35:33–34), and a psalm confesses that Israel defiled the land with blood offered to idols (Psalm 106:38–39). Judah’s sin therefore reached beyond her own heart to the ground she lived on, and it prepared the way for her exile to Babylon.
A return that was only pretence
Verse 10 brings the heaviest charge. “And yet for all this”, after the divorce of Israel and all that Judah had watched, “her treacherous sister Judah hath not turned unto me with her whole heart, but feignedly.” The verb is again shûwb. Judah did make a show of returning, and God says what that show was worth.
The heart, lêb, is the inner person in Hebrew thought: the seat of thinking, feeling and willing, and of moral character. A “whole heart” is complete and undivided devotion. “Feignedly” translates sheqer, a falsehood, a lie, a sham. Judah’s turning was a lie. In Josiah’s days there was reform in public, and yet the nation kept the temple services going while it held on to its idols, some of them inside the temple courts. The words “saith the LORD” close the verse. They are nᵉʼum Yᵉhôvâh, the utterance or declaration of the LORD, so this is God’s own finding about Judah, given by the one who sees the heart.
Scripture says the same in many places. God complains through Isaiah of a people who honour him with their lips while their heart is far from him (Isaiah 29:13), and Jesus applies those words to his own generation (Matthew 15:8). Joel calls the people to rend their hearts and not their garments (Joel 2:13). Moses promised that God would circumcise the heart of his people (Deuteronomy 30:6), and David confesses that God desires truth in the inward parts (Psalm 51:6). Jesus pronounced woes on religious leaders who looked righteous outwardly and were corrupt within (Matthew 23:27–28).
How could Israel be more just than Judah?
Israel comes out as the less guilty of two guilty sisters, and that is all the comparison means. “Justified” is tsâdaq, to be right or righteous in a moral or legal sense, and it is used here with irony. Israel had sinned so badly that God sent her away, and she was far from innocent. Beside Judah, though, her guilt was the smaller.
The reason is what each sister had seen. Israel sinned before the judgment fell. Judah sinned after it, with her sister’s exile in full view, and then added a pretended repentance. The two names carry the difference: “backsliding” describes a people who turn away and keep relapsing, while “treacherous” describes a betrayal carried out with open eyes.
So God’s judgment takes account of knowledge and opportunity. Jesus teaches that much is required of the one to whom much is given (Luke 12:48). Paul writes of the righteous judgment of God that falls on those who know better (Romans 2:1–3), and Hebrews warns against wilful sin (Hebrews 10:26–29). Israel’s history was written down as a warning to us (1 Corinthians 10:11), as Israel’s fall was a warning to Judah. Every sin offends God’s holiness, and light that has been refused makes the guilt heavier.
Christ, the faithful husband
Both sisters failed, and their failure shows that the trouble lies in the human heart, which reform and law could never mend. The passage therefore points forward to what God himself would do. He promised a new covenant in which his law would be written on the heart and sins forgiven (Jeremiah 31:31–34), and he promised a new heart and a new spirit (Ezekiel 36:26–27). Hebrews declares that this better covenant has come in Christ (Hebrews 8:6–13), and Paul says the Spirit now writes on the tables of the heart where the old law was written on stone (2 Corinthians 3:3).
Jesus is the faithful one where Israel and Judah were faithless. He came to fulfil the law and the prophets (Matthew 5:17), and he came to save the world and not to condemn it (John 3:17). He is the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world (John 1:29), and on the cross he was made a curse for us (Galatians 3:13), bearing the judgment that unfaithfulness deserves. God showed his love in this, that Christ died for us while we were still sinners (Romans 5:8).
Because of him the sinner who could never justify himself is justified freely by grace (Romans 3:23–24). God was in Christ reconciling the world to himself (2 Corinthians 5:19–21), and Christ is the way by which we come back to the Father (John 14:6). His blood cleanses us from the defilement of sin (1 John 1:7), so that we worship the living God in spirit and in truth (John 4:24). Christ loved the church as a husband and gave himself for her, to present her to himself as a pure and spotless bride (Ephesians 5:25–27). The whole-hearted return that Judah failed to make is what he gives his people by his Spirit.
The whole heart God asks for
This passage shows us a God who says “Turn thou unto me” after every wrong has already been done. His patience toward Israel was real, and the verses that follow renew the call and promise restoration to all who return (Jeremiah 3:12–18). Anyone who has wandered far can take courage from the order of verse 7, where the invitation comes after “all these things”.
It also shows that God looks past what can be seen. Judah’s public reform was impressive, and he called it a lie because her heart stayed where it was. Idols today are seldom made of stone or wood, yet a career, money, comfort or the approval of others can hold the place in the heart that belongs to God. He is as undeceived by our appearances as he was by Judah’s, and he is as ready to receive an honest return.
Judah’s story leaves us with the weight of what we know. We have Israel’s history and Judah’s, and the whole of Scripture besides, so we have seen even more than she did. The warnings we have been given are a mercy, and the God who gave them is the same God who promises a new heart to those who come to him in Christ.
Jeremiah 3:6
“The LORD said also unto me in the days of Josiah the king,”
The message is God’s own, given to Jeremiah during the reign of the reforming king (640–609 BC). It opens a new word within the early chapters of the book.
“Hast thou seen that which backsliding Israel hath done?”
God draws Jeremiah’s eye to the northern kingdom, already in exile. Mᵉshûwbâh, “backsliding”, is a turning away that has become a habit.
“she is gone up upon every high mountain and under every green tree,”
These were the places of Baal’s altars and Asherah’s poles, which the law ordered destroyed. Gâbôahh is the plain word for a high place.
“and there hath played the harlot.”
Zânâh pictures idolatry as a wife’s unfaithfulness to the husband who chose and redeemed her.
Jeremiah 3:7
“And I said after she had done all these things, Turn thou unto me.”
God’s call came late, after the full record of idolatry, and it was a call to come back to him in person: “unto me”.
“But she returned not.”
Shûwb again, now refused. Israel’s hardness led on to her exile.
“And her treacherous sister Judah saw it.”
Judah enters the passage as a witness. Râʼâh means she saw and understood, and bâgôwd names her as one who breaks faith.
Jeremiah 3:8
“And I saw,”
God is the first witness of all that both sisters did.
“when for all the causes whereby backsliding Israel committed adultery”
ʼÔwdôwth, the occasions or reasons. The judgment rested on a long record of offences.
“I had put her away, and given her a bill of divorce;”
The Assyrian exile of 722 BC, described in the language of the divorce law of Deuteronomy 24.
“yet her treacherous sister Judah feared not,”
The exile of her sister should have taught Judah reverence for God’s holiness and justice, and it left her unmoved.
“but went and played the harlot also.”
“Also” places Judah’s idolatry beside Israel’s. She copied the sins that had brought her sister down.
Jeremiah 3:9
“And it came to pass through the lightness of her whoredom,”
Qôwl and zᵉnûwth: Judah treated her betrayal of God as a small matter and carried it on in the open.
“that she defiled the land,”
Chânêph, to pollute or profane. The sin of a people stains the place where they live.
“and committed adultery with stones and with stocks.”
Idols named by what they are made of, stone and wood, which shows their powerlessness beside the living God.
Jeremiah 3:10
“And yet for all this”
These words tie Judah’s response to everything she had witnessed in verses 6 to 9.
“her treacherous sister Judah hath not turned unto me with her whole heart,”
God asks for a return that involves the whole inner person, the lêb: mind, feeling and will together.
“but feignedly,”
Sheqer, a falsehood or sham. Judah’s outward return had no truth behind it.
“saith the LORD.”
Nᵉʼum Yᵉhôvâh, the declaration of the LORD. The finding is God’s, and it carries his authority.
Jeremiah 3:11 This verse
“And the LORD said unto me,”
The verdict that follows is revealed by God, and Jeremiah delivers it as his messenger.
“The backsliding Israel hath justified herself more than”
Tsâdaq, to be in the right, said in comparison and with irony. Israel is guilty, and Judah’s guilt is heavier.
“treacherous Judah.”
Here the word is the verb bâgad, to deal treacherously. Judah still stood in Jeremiah’s day, with her own judgment drawing near.
Last revised