Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
But afterward they turned, and caused the servants and the handmaids, whom they had let go free, to return, and brought them into subjection for servants and for handmaids.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
But afterward H310 they turned H7725, and caused the servants H5650 and the handmaids H8198, whom they had let go H7971 free H2670, to return H7725, and brought them into subjection H3533 H3533 for servants H5650 and for handmaids H8198.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
But afterwards, they changed their minds; they made the male and female slaves, whom they had freed, return; and they brought them back into subjection as slaves.
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
but later they changed their minds and took back the menservants and maidservants they had freed, and they forced them to become slaves again.
Ask
American Standard Version
but afterwards they turned, and caused the servants and the handmaids, whom they had let go free, to return, and brought them into subjection for servants and for handmaids.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
but afterwards they turned, and caused the servants and the handmaids, whom they had let go free, to return, and brought them into subjection for servants and for handmaids.
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
But afterwarde they repented and caused the seruants and the handmayds, whom they had let go free, to returne, and helde them in subiection as seruants and handmayds.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
and they turn afterwards, and cause the men-servants and the maid-servants to return, whom they had sent forth free, and they subdue them for men-servants and for maid-servants.
Ask

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

Jeremiah 34:11 vividly exposes the profound moral failure and blatant hypocrisy of Judah's leaders and people during the Babylonian siege of Jerusalem. After making a solemn covenant before God to free their Hebrew servants and handmaids—an act likely driven by desperation and a fleeting hope for divine favor—they swiftly and callously reneged on their promise. This verse chronicles their immediate reversal, detailing how they forcibly compelled those they had just liberated back into the harsh realities of servitude, revealing a deep-seated spiritual malaise and a profound disregard for both divine law and human dignity.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: Jeremiah 34:11 is situated within a critical prophetic indictment against Judah, specifically addressing their covenant breaking and disobedience during the final days of Jerusalem's siege by Nebuchadnezzar. The preceding verses, Jeremiah 34:8-10, describe King Zedekiah and the people entering into a solemn covenant to free all Hebrew slaves, male and female, in accordance with the Mosaic Law, particularly as outlined in Deuteronomy 15:12-18. This significant act was performed in the temple, signifying its sacred and binding nature before God. Verse 11 then immediately details the tragic and swift reversal of this covenant, setting the stage for God's severe judgment pronounced in the subsequent verses, Jeremiah 34:17-22, highlighting the direct cause-and-effect relationship between their profound sin and impending doom.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: The events of Jeremiah 34 unfold during the final siege of Jerusalem by the Babylonian army (circa 588-586 BC), a period of immense national crisis and existential threat. The practice of temporary servitude for debt or poverty was common in ancient Israel, but the Mosaic Law provided specific protections and mandates for the release of Hebrew servants after six years, as seen in Exodus 21:2, and certainly during the Jubilee year. The covenant to free slaves was likely a desperate attempt by Zedekiah and the people to appease God and perhaps to free up manpower for the war effort, as implied by the temporary withdrawal of the Babylonian forces, possibly due to an Egyptian intervention, as referenced in Jeremiah 37:5. The swift re-enslavement of these individuals demonstrates a profound opportunism and a deep-seated disregard for the spirit of the law, revealing a society where self-interest superseded divine command and basic human compassion.
  • Key Themes: Jeremiah 34:11 powerfully illustrates several pervasive themes within the book of Jeremiah and the broader prophetic literature. Central among these is the theme of Broken Covenant and Disobedience, where Israel's repeated failure to uphold their covenant obligations with Yahweh leads to devastating consequences. This verse specifically highlights their Hypocrisy and Superficial Repentance, as their "repentance" was merely a pragmatic response to immediate danger, lacking any genuine change of heart. Their actions are a direct violation of the Mosaic Law's principles of Justice and Compassion, particularly concerning the treatment of the vulnerable and the poor, echoing the prophetic call for social justice found throughout the Old Testament, such as in Isaiah 1:17. Ultimately, this act of unfaithfulness serves as a pivotal moment demonstrating the nation's spiritual bankruptcy, justifying the impending Divine Judgment that Jeremiah consistently warns about throughout his prophetic ministry, as seen in Jeremiah 25:8-11.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • afterward (Hebrew, ʼachar', H310): This adverb signifies a temporal sequence, indicating that the turning away happened "after" the initial act of freeing the servants. It highlights the immediate and deliberate nature of their reversal, emphasizing that their change of heart was not a slow decay but a swift, conscious decision once the perceived threat diminished. It underscores the opportunistic and insincere nature of their initial "repentance."
  • turned (Hebrew, shûwb', H7725): This primitive root means "to turn back," "retreat," or "return." In this context, it signifies a moral and ethical turning away from the covenant they had just made. It's a reversal of their righteous act, illustrating their unfaithfulness and the ephemeral nature of their commitment to God's law and their fellow human beings. This "turning" is a deliberate act of apostasy from their sworn oath.
  • free (Hebrew, chophshîy', H2670): This word denotes being "exempt" or "at liberty," specifically from bondage, tax, or care. Its use here underscores the profound injustice of their actions: those who had been genuinely set free, experiencing a taste of liberty as mandated by God's law, were then cruelly stripped of that freedom and forced back into subjugation. The word highlights the preciousness of the liberty they briefly possessed and then lost.
  • subjection (Hebrew, kâbash', H3533): This root means "to tread down," "conquer," "subjugate," or "bring into bondage." Its application here powerfully conveys the forceful, oppressive, and unjust nature of their actions. It highlights the masters' exercise of arbitrary power, reducing the liberated individuals back to a state of forced servitude, starkly contrasting with the freedom they had briefly enjoyed and the dignity they were due.

Verse Breakdown

  • "But afterward they turned,": This opening phrase immediately signals a dramatic and negative shift in behavior. The "afterward" (H310, ʼachar) emphasizes the swiftness of their reversal, occurring very soon after the covenant to free the slaves was made. The "turning" (H7725, shûwb) indicates a deliberate moral and ethical U-turn, a departure from the righteous path they had momentarily embraced. It highlights their lack of genuine conviction and their opportunistic nature, revealing that their initial act was not born of true repentance but of expediency.
  • "and caused the servants and the handmaids, whom they had let go free, to return,": This clause details the specific action of their turning. The masters actively "caused" or compelled their former servants and handmaids (H5650, ʻebed and H8198, shiphchâh) to "return" (H7725, shûwb) to their previous state of bondage. The parenthetical phrase "whom they had let go free" (H7971, shâlach and H2670, chophshîy) serves as a stark reminder of the recent, publicly enacted liberation, intensifying the betrayal and hypocrisy inherent in their actions. It underscores the deliberate revocation of a granted liberty.
  • "and brought them into subjection for servants and for handmaids.": This final clause clarifies the ultimate outcome of their reversal: the re-enslavement of those who had been freed. The phrase "brought them into subjection" (H3533, kâbash) conveys the forceful and oppressive nature of this act, signifying that they were not merely returned to service but forcibly subjugated, stripped of their recently granted liberty and dignity, and reduced once again to the status of mere property. The repetition of "for servants and for handmaids" emphasizes the full restoration of their former, unjust status.

Literary Devices

Jeremiah 34:11 employs several powerful literary devices to convey its message of betrayal and injustice. The most prominent is Irony, as the very people who had just made a solemn covenant to free their slaves, ostensibly to gain divine favor during a siege, immediately re-enslave them once the immediate threat subsides. This stark contrast between their declared intent and their actual behavior highlights their profound hypocrisy and the superficiality of their piety. The use of Repetition in "servants and handmaids" at both the beginning and end of the clause emphasizes the specific group affected by this injustice, underscoring the completeness of their reversal of fortune and the comprehensive nature of their broken promise. Furthermore, the verse functions as a form of Prophetic Indictment, serving not just as a historical record but as a divine accusation against the people's unfaithfulness, justifying the severe judgment that follows. The Juxtaposition of "let go free" and "brought them into subjection" creates a powerful rhetorical effect, emphasizing the abrupt and cruel reversal of their status and the masters' callous disregard for their well-being and God's law.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

Jeremiah 34:11 stands as a profound theological statement on the nature of true repentance, the sanctity of covenants, and God's unwavering commitment to justice. It reveals that God is not fooled by superficial acts of piety or conditional obedience. The people's actions demonstrate a fundamental misunderstanding of their relationship with Yahweh, viewing Him as a deity to be manipulated for immediate relief rather than a holy God demanding genuine faithfulness and righteousness. This episode underscores that external rituals or temporary acts of obedience, disconnected from a transformed heart, are an abomination to God and will incur His righteous judgment. It foreshadows the ultimate judgment that will befall Jerusalem precisely because of such deep-seated spiritual corruption and a consistent pattern of covenant breaking, emphasizing that God's character demands integrity and adherence to His moral standards.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

Jeremiah 34:11 serves as a timeless mirror reflecting the human tendency towards self-interest, conditional obedience, and spiritual hypocrisy. It challenges us to examine the authenticity of our own faith and commitments. Are our acts of devotion and obedience rooted in a genuine love for God and His commands, or are they merely pragmatic responses to difficult circumstances, to be abandoned once the pressure subsides? This passage calls us to cultivate integrity, ensuring that our words and actions align, especially when it is costly or inconvenient. It reminds us that true repentance involves not just a temporary change in behavior but a fundamental transformation of the heart that leads to consistent righteousness and compassion, particularly towards the vulnerable and marginalized. Our commitment to justice and freedom for others is a tangible expression of our love for God and our neighbor, reflecting the very character of God Himself.

Questions for Reflection

  • In what areas of my life might my obedience to God be conditional or opportunistic, rather than rooted in genuine conviction?
  • How does this passage challenge my understanding of true repentance and its implications for my actions towards others?
  • Am I upholding my promises and commitments, especially when circumstances change or when it becomes difficult?
  • How can I actively demonstrate God's concern for justice and compassion in my own sphere of influence, particularly towards those who are vulnerable or oppressed?

FAQ

What was the specific covenant mentioned in Jeremiah 34 that the people broke?

Answer: The covenant mentioned in Jeremiah 34:8 was a solemn agreement made by King Zedekiah and all the people of Jerusalem to free their Hebrew servants and handmaids. This act was in accordance with the Mosaic Law, specifically the statutes found in Deuteronomy 15:12-18 and Exodus 21:2-6, which mandated that Hebrew servants be set free after six years of service. They entered into this covenant during the Babylonian siege, likely hoping to gain divine favor and perhaps free up manpower for their defense.

Why did the people re-enslave their servants after setting them free?

Answer: The re-enslavement occurred because the Babylonian army temporarily withdrew from Jerusalem, possibly to confront an Egyptian relief force, as suggested in Jeremiah 37:5. Once the immediate threat seemed to subside, the people and their leaders, driven by self-interest and a lack of genuine repentance or faith, immediately reneged on their sacred promise. Their "obedience" was conditional, motivated by fear and pragmatism rather than a true change of heart or commitment to God's law. They quickly reverted to their old ways, demonstrating a profound spiritual hypocrisy and a disregard for both human dignity and divine command.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

Jeremiah 34:11, with its stark portrayal of broken covenants and human unfaithfulness, powerfully illuminates the necessity of God's ultimate and unshakeable faithfulness, perfectly embodied in Jesus Christ. The people's failure to uphold their word, even after a solemn oath, underscores humanity's inherent inability to perfectly fulfill the Law and maintain covenant with God. This brokenness points to the desperate need for a New Covenant, one not dependent on fickle human will but established by divine grace. Jesus Christ is the mediator of this New Covenant, established through His perfect obedience and sacrificial death on the cross (Hebrews 9:15). Unlike the people of Judah who re-enslaved those they had freed, Christ offers true and lasting freedom from the bondage of sin and death (John 8:36). He is the faithful Servant who perfectly fulfilled God's will, even to the point of death (Philippians 2:8), ensuring that His promises of salvation and eternal life are never rescinded. The hypocrisy and opportunism of Judah's leaders contrast sharply with Christ's unwavering integrity and self-giving love, demonstrating that true liberation comes not from human effort or fleeting promises, but from the enduring, perfect work of the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world.

Copy as

Commentary on Jeremiah 34 verses 8–22

I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points

We have here another prophecy upon a particular occasion, the history of which we must take notice of, as necessary to give light to the prophecy.

I. When Jerusalem was closely besieged by the Chaldean army the princes and people agreed upon a reformation in one instance, and that was concerning their servants.

1.The law of God was very express, that those of their own nation should not be held in servitude above seven years, but, after they had served one apprenticeship, they should be discharged and have their liberty; yea, though they had sold themselves into servitude for the payment of their debts, or though they were sold by the judges for the punishment of their crimes. This difference was put between their brethren and strangers, that those of other nations taken in war, or bought with money, might be held in perpetual slavery, they and theirs; but their brethren must serve but for seven years at the longest. This God calls the covenant that he had made with them when he brought them out of the land of Egypt, Jer 34:13, Jer 34:14. This was the first of the judicial laws which God gave them (Exo 21:2), and there was good reason for this law. (1.) God had put honour upon that nation, and he would have them thus to preserve the honour of it themselves and to put a difference between it and other nations. (2.) God had brought them out of slavery in Egypt, and he would have them thus to express their grateful sense of that favour, by letting those go to whom their houses were houses of bondage, as Egypt had been to their forefathers. That deliverance is therefore mentioned here (Jer 34:13) as the ground of that law. Note, God's compassions towards us should engage our compassions towards our brethren; we must release as we are released, forgive as we are forgiven, and relieve as we are relieved. And this is called a covenant; for our performance of the duty required is the condition of the continuance of the favours God has bestowed.

2.This law they and their fathers had broken. Their worldly profit swayed more with them than God's command or covenant. When their servants had lived seven years with them they understood their business, and how to apply themselves to it, better than they did when they first came to them, and therefore they would then by no means part with them, though God himself by his law had made them free: Your fathers hearkened not to me in this matter (Jer 34:14), so that from the days of their fathers they had been in this trespass; and they thought they might do it because their fathers did it, and their servants had by disuse lost the benefit of the provision God made for them; whereas against an express law, especially against an express law of God, no custom, usage, nor prescription, is to be admitted in plea. For this sin of theirs, and their fathers, God now brought them into servitude, and justly.

3.When they were besieged, and closely shut in, by the army of the Chaldeans, they, being told of their fault in this matter, immediately reformed, and let go all their servants that were entitled to their freedom by the law of God, as Pharaoh, who, when the plague was upon him, consented to let the people go, and bound themselves in a covenant to do so. (1.) The prophets faithfully admonished them concerning their sin. From them they heard that they should let their Hebrew servants go free, Jer 34:10. They might have read it themselves in the book of the law, but did not, or did not heed it, therefore the prophets told them what the law was. See what need there is of the preaching of the word; people must hear the word preached because they will not make the use they ought to make of the word written. (2.) All orders and degrees of men concurred in this reformation. The king, and the princes, and all the people, agreed to let go their servants, whatever loss or damage they might sustain by so doing. When the king and princes led in this good work the people could not for shame but follow. The example and influence of great men would go very far towards extirpating the most inveterate corruptions. (3.) They bound themselves by a solemn oath and covenant that they would do this, whereby they engaged themselves to God and one another. Note, What God has bound us to by his precept, it is good for us to bind ourselves to by our promise. This covenant was very solemn: it was made in a sacred place, made before me, in the house which is called by my name (Jer 34:15), in the special presence of God, the tokens of which, in the temple, ought to strike an awe upon them and make them very sincere in their appeals to him. It was ratified by a significant sign; they cut a calf in two, and passed between the parts thereof (Jer 34:18, Jer 34:19) with this dreadful imprecation, "Let us be in like manner cut asunder if we do not perform what we now promise." This calf was probably offered up in sacrifice to God, who was thereby made a party to the covenant. When God covenanted with Abraham, for the ratification of it, a smoking furnace and a burning lamp passed between the pieces of the sacrifice, in allusion to this federal rite, Gen 15:17. Note, In order that we may effectually oblige ourselves to our duty, it is good to alarm ourselves with the apprehensions of the terror of the wrath and curse to which we expose ourselves if we live in the contempt of it, that wrath which will cut sinners asunder (Mat 24:51), and sensible signs may be of use to make the impressions of it deep and durable, as here. (4.) They conformed themselves herein to the command of God and their covenant with him; they did let their servants go, though at this time, when the city was besieged, they could very ill spare them. Thus they did right in God's sight, Jer 34:15. Though it was their trouble that drove them to it, yet he was well pleased with it; and if they had persevered in this act of mercy to the poor, to their poor servants, it might have been a lengthening of their tranquillity, Dan 4:27.

II. When there was some hope that the siege was raised and the danger over they repented of their repentance, undid the good they had done, and forced the servants they had released into their respective services again. 1. The king of Babylon's army had now gone up from them, Jer 34:21. Pharaoh was bringing an army of Egyptians to oppose the progress of the king of Babylon's victories, upon the tidings of which the Chaldeans raised the siege for a time, as we find, Jer 37:5. They departed from Jerusalem. See how ready God was to put a stop to his judgments, upon the first instance of reformation, so slow is he to anger and so swift to show mercy. As soon as ever they let their servants go free God let them go free. 2. When they began to think themselves safe from the besiegers they made their servants come back into subjection to them, Jer 34:11, and again Jer 34:16. This was a great abuse to their servants, to whom servitude would be more irksome, after they had had some taste of the pleasures of liberty. It was a great shame to themselves that they could not keep in a good mind when they were in it. But it was especially an affront to God; in doing this they polluted his name, Jer 34:16. It was a contempt of the command he had given them, as if that were of no force at all, but they might either keep it or break it as they thought fit. It was a contempt of the covenant they had made with him, and of that wrath which they had imprecated upon themselves in case they should break that covenant. It was jesting with God almighty, as if he could be imposed upon by fallacious promises, which, when they had gained their point, they would look upon themselves no longer obliged by. it was lying to God with their mouths and flattering him with their tongues. It was likewise a contempt of the judgments of God and setting them at defiance; as if, when once the course of them was stopped a little and interrupted, they would never proceed again and the judgment would never be revived; whereas reprieves are so far from being pardons that if they be abused thus, and sinners take encouragement from them to return to sin, they are but preparatives for heavier strokes of divine vengeance.

III. For this treacherous dealing with God they are here severely threatened. Be not deceived; God is not mocked. Those that think to put a cheat upon God by a dissembled repentance, a fallacious covenant, and a partial temporary reformation, will prove in the end to have put the greatest cheat upon their own souls; for the Lord, whose name is Jealous, is a jealous God. it is here threatened, with an observable air of displeasure against them, 1. That, since they had not given liberty to their servants to go where they pleased, God would give all his judgments liberty to take their course against them without control (Jer 34:17): You have not proclaimed liberty to your servants. Though they had done it (Jer 34:10), yet they might truly be said not to have done it, because they did not stand to it, but undid it again; and factum non dicitur quod non perseverat - that is not said to be done which does not last. The righteousness that is forsaken and turned away from shall be forgotten, and not mentioned any more than if it had never been, Eze 18:24. "Therefore I will proclaim a liberty for you; I will discharge you from my service, and put you out of my protection, which those forfeit that withdraw from their allegiance. You shall have liberty to choose which of these judgments you will be cut off by, sword, famine, or pestilence;" such a liberty as was offered to David, which put him into a great strait, Sa2 24:14. Note, Those that will not be in subjection to the law of God put themselves into subjection to the wrath and curse of God. But this shows what liberty to sin really - it is but a liberty to the sorest judgments. 2. That, since they had brought their servants back into confinement in their houses, God would make them to be removed into all the kingdoms of the earth, where they should live in servitude, and, being strangers, could not expect the privileges of free-born subjects. 3. That, since they had broken the covenant which they ratified by a solemn imprecation, God would bring on them the evil which they imprecated upon themselves in case they should break it. out of their own mouth will he judge them, and so shall their doom be; the penalty of their bond shall be recovered, because they have not performed the condition; for so some read Jer 34:18, "I will make the men which have transgressed my covenant as the calf which they cut in twain; I will divide them asunder as they divided it asunder." 4. That, since they would not let go their servants out of the hands, God would deliver them into the hands of those that hated them, even the princes and nobles both of Judah and Jerusalem (of the country and of the city), the eunuchs (chamberlains, or great officers of the court), the priests, and all the people, Jer 34:19. They had all dealt treacherously with God, and therefore shall all be involved in the common ruin without exception. They shall all be given unto the hand of their enemies, that seek, not their wealth only, or their service, but their life, and they shall have what they seek; but neither shall that content them: when they have their lives they shall leave their dead bodies unburied, a loathsome spectacle to all mankind and an easy prey to the fowls and beasts, a lasting mark of ignominy being hereby fastened on them, Jer 34:20. 5. That, since they had emboldened themselves in returning to their sin, contrary to their covenant, by the retreat of the Chaldean army from them, God would therefore bring it upon them again: "They have now gone up from you, and your fright is over for the present, but I will command them to face about as they were; they shall return to this city, and take it and burn it," Jer 34:22. Note, (1.) As confidence in God is a hopeful presage of approaching deliverance, so security in sin is a sad omen of approaching destruction. (2.) When judgments are removed from a people before they have done their work, leave them, but leave them unhumbled and unreformed, it is cum animo revertendi - with a design to return; they do but retreat to come on again with so much the greater force; for when God judges he will overcome. (3.) It is just with God to disappoint those expectations of mercy which his providence had given cause for when we disappoint those expectations of duty which our professions, pretensions, and fair promises, had given cause for. If we repent of the good we had purposed, God will repent of the good he had purposed. With the froward thou will show thyself froward.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 8–22. Public domain.
Copy as
JeromeAD 420
St. Jerome, Commentary on Daniel, CHAPTER SEVEN
[Daniel 7:1] "In the first year of Belshazzar, King of Babylon, Daniel beheld a dream. And a vision of his head upon his bed. And when he wrote the dream down, he comprehended it in a few words and gave a brief summary of it, saying..." This section which we now undertake to explain, and also the subsequent section which we are going to discuss, is historically prior to the two previous sections. For this present section and that which follows it are recorded to have taken place in the first and third years of the reign of King Belshazzar (Jeremiah 39) [Jerome's citation of Jeremiah 39 seems quite pointless in this connection]. But the section which we read previously to the one just preceding this, is recorded to have taken place in the last year, indeed on the final day, of Belshaz-zar's reign. And we meet this phenomenon not only in Daniel but also in Jeremiah [cf. Jeremiah 35 and Jeremiah 34] and Ezekiel (Ezekiel 17), as we shall be able to show, if life spares us that long. But in the earlier portion of the book, the historical order has been followed, namely the events which occurred in the time of Nebuchadnezzar, and Belshazzar, and Darius or Cyrus. But in the passages now before us an account is given of various visions which were beheld on particular occasions and of which only the prophet himself was aware, and which therefore lacked any importance as signs or revelations so far as the barbarian nations were concerned. But they were written down only that a record of the things beheld might be preserved for posterity.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Jeremiah 34:11 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.