Isaiah 7:15
“The Sign of Immanuel Promised”Isaiah 7:10–16
Bible text: King James Version (1769 Blayney text) · Public domain
Bible text: Berean Standard Bible · Public domain
Bible text: American Standard Version (1901) · Public domain
Bible text: World English Bible, Messianic edition · Public domain
Bible text: Geneva Bible (1599) · Public domain
Bible text: Young's Literal Translation · Public domain
- חֶמְאָהchem·'Ahcurd[s]H2529N-fsNoun Singular Feminine Absolute
- וּדְבַשׁu·de·Vashand honeyH1706Conj-w ¦ N-msNoun Singular Masculine Absoluteוּandדְבַשׁhoney
- יֹאכֵלyo·Khelhe will eatH398V-Qal-Imperf-3msVerb Qal Imperfect 3rd Singular Masculine
- לְדַעְתּוֹle·da'·Toto knowing hisH3045Prep-l ¦ V-Qal-Inf ¦ 3msVerb Qal Infinitive Constructלְtoדַעְתּknowingוֹhis
- מָאוֹסma·'osto rejectH3988V-Qal-InfAbsVerb Qal Infinitive Absolute
- בָּרָעba·Ra'[in] the evilH7451Prep-b ¦ Adj-msAdjective Singular Masculine Absoluteבָּ[in] theרָעevil
- וּבָחוֹרu·va·Chorand to chooseH977Conj-w ¦ V-Qal-InfAbsVerb Qal Infinitive Absoluteוּandבָחוֹרto choose
- בַּטּוֹבba·Tov[in] the goodH2896Prep-b ¦ Adj-msAdjective Singular Masculine Absoluteבַּ[in] theטּוֹבgood
English is a literal word-by-word gloss of the Hebrew, not the KJV's wording. Why?
This is the original text the KJV's translators worked from — each Hebrew word with its own literal English meaning in this verse, prepared by scholars at Tyndale House, Cambridge. The KJV translates whole sentences, not word by word, so its wording differs: one Hebrew word can become several English words, and the KJV may choose “the LORD” where the gloss reads “Yahweh”. Both are faithful — they answer different questions. For the KJV's own rendering, switch to the KJV text.
Words in [ ] are added by the English.
- Butter (KJV) / curds (BSB) חֶמְאָה
Details
See on the biblical-era map

Study this verse
Public-domain commentary
Matthew Henry
From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry wrote on whole passages, and this entry covers Isaiah 7:10–16. He set out his notes in a two-level outline, kept here as he numbered it.
Here, I. God, by the prophet, makes a gracious offer to Ahaz, to confirm the foregoing predictions, and his faith in them, by such sign or miracle as he should choose (Isaiah 7:10, Isaiah 7:11): Ask thee a sign of the Lord thy God; See here the divine faithfulness and veracity. God tells us nothing but what he is able and ready to prove. See his wonderful condescension to the children of men, in that he is so willing to show to the heirs of promise the immutability of his counsel, Hebrews 6:17. He considers our frame, and that, living in a world of sense, we are apt to require sensible proofs, which therefore he has favoured us with in sacramental signs and seals. Ahaz was a bad man, yet God is called the Lord his God, because he was a child of Abraham and David, and of the covenants made with them. See how gracious God is even to the evil and unthankful; Ahaz is bidden to choose his sign, as Gideon about the fleece (Judges 6:37); let him ask for a sign in the air, or earth, or water, for God's power is the same in all.
II.Ahaz rudely refuses this gracious offer, and (which is not mannerly towards any superior) kicks at the courtesy, and puts a slight upon it (Isaiah 7:12): I will not ask. The true reason why he would not ask for a sign was because, having a dependence upon the Assyrians, their forces, and their gods, for help, he would not thus far be beholden to the God of Israel, or lay himself under obligations to him. He would not ask a sign for the confirming of his faith because he resolved to persist in his unbelief, and would indulge his doubts and distrusts; yet he pretends a pious reason: I will not tempt the Lord; as if it would be a tempting of God to do that which God himself invited and directed him to do. Note, A secret disaffection to God is often disguised with the specious colours of respect to him; and those who are resolved that they will not trust God yet pretend that they will not tempt him.
III.The prophet reproves him and his court, him and the house of David, the whole royal family, for their contempt of prophecy, and the little value they had for divine revelation (Isaiah 7:13) "Is it a small thing for you to weary men by your oppression and tyranny, with which you make yourselves burdensome and odious to all mankind? But will you weary my God also with the affronts you put upon him?" As the unjust judge that neither feared God nor regarded man, Luke 18:2. You have wearied the Lord with your words, Malachi 2:17. Nothing is more grievous to the God of heaven than to be distrusted. "Will you weary my God? Will you suppose him to be tired and unable to help you, or to be weary of doing you good? Whereas the youths may faint and be weary, you may have tired all your friends, the Creator of the ends of the earth faints not, neither is weary." Isaiah 40:28-31. Or this: "In affronting the prophets, you think you put a slight only upon men like yourselves, and consider not that you affront God himself, whose messengers they are, and put a slight upon him, who will resent it accordingly." The prophet here calls God his God with a great deal of pleasure: Ahaz would not say, He is my God, though the prophet had invited him to say so (Isaiah 7:11): The Lord thy God; but Isaiah will say, "He is mine." Note, Whatever others do, we must avouch the Lord for ours and abide by him.
IV.The prophet, in God's name, gives them a sign:
"You will not ask a sign, but the unbelief of man shall not make the promise of God of no effect: The Lord himself shall give you a sign (Isaiah 7:14), a double sign."
1."A sign in general of his good-will to Israel and to the house of David. You may conclude it that he has mercy in store for you, and that you are not forsaken of your God, how great soever your present distress and danger are; for of your nation, of your family, the Messiah is to be born, and you cannot be destroyed while that blessing is in you, which shall be introduced," (1.) "In a glorious manner; for, whereas you have been often told that he should be born among you, I am now further to tell you that he shall be born of a virgin, which will signify both the divine power and the divine purity with which he shall be brought into the world, - that he shall be a extraordinary person, for he shall not be born by ordinary generation, - and that he shall be a holy thing, not stained with the common pollutions of the human nature, therefore incontestably fit to have the throne of his father David given him." Now this, though it was to be accomplished above 500 years after, was a most encouraging sign to the house of David (and to them, under that title, this prophecy is directed, Isaiah 7:13) and an assurance that God would not cast them off. Ephraim did indeed envy Judah (Isaiah 11:13) and sought the ruin of that kingdom, but could not prevail; for the sceptre should never depart from Judah till the coming of Shiloh, Genesis 49:10. Those whom God designs for the great salvation may take that for a sign to them that they shall not be swallowed up by any trouble they meet with in the way. (2.) The Messiah shall be introduced on a glorious errand, wrapped up in his glorious name: They shall call his name Immanuel - God with us, God in our nature, God at peace with us, in covenant with us. This was fulfilled in their calling him Jesus - a Saviour (Matthew 1:21-25), for, if he had not been Immanuel - God with us, he could not have been Jesus - a Saviour. Now this was a further sign of God's favour to the house of David and the tribe of Judah; for he that intended to work this great salvation among them no doubt would work out for them all those other salvations which were to be the types and figures of this, and as it were preludes to this. "Here is a sign for you, not in the depth nor in the height, but in the prophecy, in the promise, in the covenant made with David, which you are no strangers to. The promised seed shall be Immanuel, God with us; let that word comfort you (Isaiah 8:10), that God is with us, and (v. 8) that your land is Immanuel's land. Let not the heart of the house of David be moved thus (Isaiah 7:2), nor let Judah fear the setting up of the son of Tabeal (Isaiah 7:6), for nothing can cut off the entail on the Son of David that shall be Immanuel." Note, The strongest consolations, in time of trouble, are those which are borrowed from Christ, our relation to him, our interest in him, and our expectations of him and from him. Of this child it is further foretold (Isaiah 7:15) that though he shall not be born like other children, but of a virgin, yet he shall be really and truly man, and shall be nursed and brought up like other children: Butter and honey shall he eat, as other children do, particularly the children of that land which flowed with milk and honey. Though he be conceived by the power of the Holy Ghost, yet he shall not therefore be fed with angels' food, but, as it becomes him, shall be in all things made like unto his brethren, Hebrews 2:17. Nor shall he, though born thus by extraordinary generation, be a man immediately, but, as other children, shall advance gradually through the several states of infancy, childhood, and youth, to that of manhood, and growing in wisdom and stature, shall at length wax strong in spirit, and come to maturity, so as to know how to refuse the evil and choose the good. See Luke 2:40, Luke 2:52. Note, Children are fed when they are little that they may be taught and instructed when they have grown up; they have their maintenance in order to their education.
2.Here is another sign in particular of the speedy destruction of these potent princes that were now a terror to Judah, Isaiah 7:16. "Before this child (so it should be read), this child which I have now in my arms" (he means not Immanuel, but Shear-jashub his own son, whom he was ordered to take with him for a sign, Isaiah 7:3), "before this child shall know how to refuse the evil and choose the good" (and those who saw what his present stature and forwardness were would easily conjecture how long that would be), "before this child be three or four years older, the land that thou abhorrest, these confederate forces of Israelites and Syrians, which thou hast such an enmity to and standest in such dread of, shall be forsaken of both their kings, both Pekah and Rezin," who were in so close an alliance that they seemed as if they were the kings of but one kingdom. This was fully accomplished; for within two or three years after this, Hoshea conspired against Pekah, and slew him (2 Kings 15:30), and, before that, the king of Assyria took Damascus, and slew Rezin, 2 Kings 16:9. Nay, there was a present event, which happened immediately, and when this child carried the prediction of in his name, which was a pledge and earnest of this future event. Shear-jashub signifies The remnant shall return, which doubtless points at the wonderful return of those 200,000 captives whom Pekah and Rezin had carried away, who were brought back, not by might or power, but by the Spirit of the Lord of hosts. Read the story, 2 Chronicles 28:8-15. The prophetical naming of this child having thus had its accomplishment, no doubt this, which was further added concerning him, should have its accomplishment likewise, that Syria and Israel should be deprived of both their kings. One mercy from God encourages us to hope for another, if it engages us to prepare for another.
Historical interpretation
Five Centuries of Reception
4 surviving comments on this verse. Each one is dated, so this reads as a timeline rather than a list.
Select a marker to jump to its quote. Markers stagger vertically where authors wrote within a few decades of each other.
For the one and the same Spirit of God, who proclaimed by the prophets what and of what sort the advent of the Lord should be, did by these elders give a just interpretation of what had been truly prophesied; and He did Himself, by the apostles, announce that the fullness of the times of the adoption had arrived, that the kingdom of heaven had drawn near, and that He was dwelling within those that believe in Him who was born Emmanuel of the Virgin. To this effect they testify, [saying,] that before Joseph had come together with Mary, while she therefore remained in virginity, "she was found with child of the Holy Ghost;" [Matthew 1:18] and that the angel Gabriel said to her, "The Holy Ghost shall come upon you, and the power of the Highest shall overshadow you; therefore also that holy thing which shall be born of you shall be called the Son of God;" [Luke 1:35] and that the angel said to Joseph in a dream, "Now this was done, that it might be fulfilled which was spoken by Isaiah the prophet, Behold, a virgin shall be with child." [Matthew 1:23] But the elders have thus interpreted what Esaias said: "And the Lord, moreover, said to Ahaz, Ask for yourself a sign from the Lord your God out of the depth below, or from the height above. And Ahaz said, I will not ask, and I will not tempt the Lord. And he said, It is not a small thing for you to weary men; and how does the Lord weary them? Therefore the Lord himself shall give you a sign; Behold, a virgin shall conceive, and bear a son; and you shall call His name Emmanuel. Butter and honey shall He eat: before He knows or chooses out things that are evil, He shall exchange them for what is good; for before the child knows good or evil, He shall not consent to evil, that He may choose that which is good." [Isaiah 7:10-17] Carefully, then, has the Holy Ghost pointed out, by what has been said, His birth from a virgin, and His essence, that He is God (for the name Emmanuel indicates this). And He shows that He is a man, when He says, "Butter and honey shall He eat;" and in that He terms Him a child also, [in saying,] "before He knows good and evil;" for these are all the tokens of a human infant. But that He "will not consent to evil, that He may choose that which is good,"— this is proper to God; that by the fact, that He shall eat butter and honey, we should not understand that He is a mere man only, nor, on the other hand, from the name Emmanuel, should suspect Him to be God without flesh.
This is said [“The child grew in wisdom and in age before God and men”] in order to establish the truth of his human body. Nevertheless, wrapped in swaddling clothes and fed with curds and honey, he will have the judgment to distinguish between good and evil, that rejecting evil he might choose the good. It does not say that he will in fact reject and choose but that he would learn to reject and to choose, so that we might know through such words that this pertains to the infant’s human body, not to divine wisdom. Finally, it must be believed that the angels who announced to shepherds the news of the infant lying in a manger and the magi who came from the east to worship him were chosen. Herod, the scribes and the Pharisees, on the other hand, were condemned because they slaughtered thousands of children for the sake of one infant.
(Verse 15) He shall eat butter and honey, so that he may know how to refuse the evil and choose the good. For before he knows to refuse the evil and choose the good, the land that you dread will be forsaken by both her kings. The Lord will bring the king of Assyria upon you and your people and your father's house—days that have not come since the day that Ephraim departed from Judah. And it shall come to pass in that day, that the Lord shall hiss for the fly that is in the uttermost part of the rivers of Egypt, and for the bee that is in the land of Assyria. And they shall come, and shall rest all of them in the desolate valleys, and in the holes of the rocks, and upon all thorns, and upon all bushes. I will say something even more amazing, so that you do not think that he is born in a fantasy, he will use foods of infancy, he will eat butter and milk. And although many centuries later the Evangelist testifies about him: But the child grew in wisdom and age and grace before God and men (Luke 2:52): and this is said to confirm the truth of the human body: yet still wrapped in swaddling clothes, and fed with butter and honey, he will have the ability to judge between good and evil, so that he may reject evil and choose good. Not because he did or disapproved or chose this, but because he knew how to disapprove and choose, so that through these words we may know that the infancy of the human body did not hinder divine wisdom. Lastly, the Angels announce to the shepherds the laying in the manger: The Magi adore coming from the East, whom it is to be believed were certainly chosen. And on the other hand, Herod, the scribes, and the Pharisees are disapproved, (Matthew 2), because they killed many thousands of infants for the sake of one child.
Now, since the Lord was not a mere man but was also God and knew all things, he stood in no need of reflection, inquiry, counsel or judgment. He also had a natural affinity for good and antipathy for evil. Thus it is in this sense that the prophet Isaiah, too, says, “Before the child shall know to refuse the evil, he will choose the good. For before the child knows to refuse the evil and to choose the good, he will reject the evil by choosing the good.” The “before” shows that he made no inquiry or investigation in a human manner but that since he was God and divinely subsisted in the flesh—that is to say, was personally united to the flesh—by the fact of his very being and his knowing all things he naturally possessed the good.
Continue studying Isaiah 7:15 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
- BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
- Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
- ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
- NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
- STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
- BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
- USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
- BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
- StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
- BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
- Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
- Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
- Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
- SefariaThe Hebrew text with Rashi and centuries of Jewish commentary.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
Written with AI assistance. Always check it against Scripture.
This verse
The promised child will eat curds and honey, the food of a land laid waste, until he is old enough to refuse evil and choose good.
“Butter and honey shall he eat,”
Curds and wild honey, the food of herds and wild places in a land laid waste by war.
“that he may know to refuse the evil, and choose the good.”
The age of moral discernment, the clock by which verse 16 measures God’s deliverance.
Passage studyIsaiah 7:10–16
The Lord Gives the Sign of Immanuel
Summary
Judah is at war, and King Ahaz is afraid. The LORD has already promised him that the attack of Syria and Israel will fail, and now he speaks to him again and offers him any sign he cares to ask for, from the depths below to the heights above. Ahaz refuses and covers his unbelief with pious words, so Isaiah rebukes the house of David for wearying God. Then the Lord himself gives the sign: a virgin shall conceive and bear a son, and his name shall be Immanuel, God with us. Before that child is old enough to refuse the evil and choose the good, the two kings Ahaz dreads will be gone. Matthew tells us that this promise was fulfilled when Jesus was born of the virgin Mary, so the sign a fearful king turned away is the sign God gives to us in his Son.
Why the LORD spoke to Ahaz again
These verses fall in the Syro-Ephraimite War, about 735 to 732 BC. Rezin king of Syria (Aram) and Pekah king of Israel (Ephraim) had formed an alliance against the growing power of Assyria and wanted Judah to join them. When Ahaz held back, they marched on Jerusalem to depose him and put a ruler of their own on David’s throne, the son of Tabeel (Isaiah 7:6). The chapter opens with that threat (Isaiah 7:1), and “his heart was moved, and the heart of his people, as the trees of the wood are moved with the wind” (Isaiah 7:2). Here begins the part of Isaiah often called the Book of Immanuel, which runs from chapter 7 to the song of salvation in Isaiah 12.
God had already sent Isaiah to meet Ahaz with a clear word: “be quiet, fear not, neither be fainthearted” (Isaiah 7:4). Of the two kings’ plan he said, “It shall not stand, neither shall it come to pass” (Isaiah 7:7–9), and he called Ahaz to believe, to stand firm on that word, so that he would be established. That whole first message is in Isaiah 7:1–9.
Ahaz remained afraid and unpersuaded. His mind was already turning to Assyria, the empire whose help he would soon buy with tribute (2 Kings 16:7–9). For a king of Judah, whose kingdom rested on the LORD’s covenant, that was a crisis of trust, because it put a foreign power where God should have been.
“Moreover the LORD spake again unto Ahaz.” The name is Yᵉhôvâh, the self-existent and eternal God, the God of Israel’s covenant who makes promises and keeps them in history. The verb dâbar is a root whose first sense is to arrange, and it is used for speaking, here for a deliberate word from God that carries his authority. “Again” is yâçaph, to add or to go on doing a thing, and the Hebrew phrase vayyoseph Yᵉhôvâh dabber says that the LORD continued to speak. “Moreover” ties this to all that came before. God had spoken once and been met with fear, and he comes back to the same frightened king with a further word and an offer.
That is his way with his people. Through Jeremiah he reminded Judah how he had sent his servants the prophets to them again and again in their disobedience (Jeremiah 7:25). Peter says that the Lord is longsuffering, “not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance” (2 Peter 3:9). God’s patience with Ahaz is that same patience.
A sign from the depth or from the height
“Ask thee a sign of the LORD thy God.” God speaks of himself as the LORD thy God, Ahaz’s own God, which reminds the son of David of the covenant and of the faithfulness shown to his family through the generations. The verb shâʼal means to inquire or request, and it can go as far as to demand. It comes twice, “ask thee… ask it”, and both times it is God’s own invitation, freely given to a frightened king who had done nothing to earn it.
A sign, ʼôwth, comes probably from a root meaning to appear. It is a signal, a mark or a token, often a miracle, something that can be seen and that confirms a message or a promise. In Israel signs often went with a prophet’s word to confirm it. God gave Moses signs to confirm his word (Exodus 4:1–9), and Gideon, though he hesitated, humbly asked for the sign of the fleece and received it (Judges 6:36–40). The sign offered here was meant to strengthen Ahaz’s faltering faith and to give him proof that God would protect Judah.
What makes the offer remarkable is its size. “In the depth” uses ʻâmaq, to be deep, for the lowest place there is: the deepest parts of the earth, and the grave, Sheol, the realm of the dead. “In the height above” joins gâbahh, height, to maʻal, above, and reaches to the highest heavens. Naming two extremes in this way, a figure called a merism, takes in everything between them. Ahaz might have asked for a wonder in the sky or a wonder from under the earth. Either was his for the asking, because everything from the lowest depth to the highest heaven belongs to God and answers to his power.
Why Ahaz’s refusal was unbelief
“But Ahaz said, I will not ask, neither will I tempt the LORD.” His name, ʼÂchâz, means possessor, and the answer is his own, given in person to God’s offer. He refuses the very thing God told him to do, shâʼal, ask. And he gives a reason that sounds devout. The verb nâçâh means to test or prove, to try something out, and God had commanded Israel against tempting him as they had done at Massah, when they quarrelled with Moses in the wilderness (Exodus 17:2, Deuteronomy 6:16).
That command forbids testing God out of doubt or rebellion, demanding that he prove himself when he has already shown his power and faithfulness. Ahaz’s case was the opposite, because God himself had offered the test. Accepting a sign that God offers is simple obedience, and refusing it meant refusing the trust he was asking for. Ahaz took a true principle and used it as cover for a decision he had already made, to rely on Assyria. His words were reverent while his heart was set against God’s way, and so this verse warns us against unbelief that speaks the language of piety.
Jesus used the same command rightly. When Satan tempted him in the wilderness to presume on God for a miracle, Jesus answered with these words from Deuteronomy (Matthew 4:7). His refusal to tempt the Lord came from perfect trust in his Father, and Ahaz’s came from unbelief, though the words were the same.
Ahaz went his own way. He appealed to the king of Assyria and paid him tribute (2 Kings 16:7–9, 2 Chronicles 28:16–21). The record of his reign in 2 Kings 16 and 2 Chronicles 28 tells how he adopted idolatrous practices and even sacrificed his own son, and how the help he bought from Assyria brought Judah great distress. Jeremiah would later declare a curse on the one who trusts in man and a blessing on the one who trusts in the LORD (Jeremiah 17:5–8), and Isaiah himself returned to the same warning when Judah looked again to human strength (Isaiah 30).
Is it wrong to ask God for a sign?
It depends on whose idea the sign is. Demanding that God prove himself, out of doubt, is the sin of Massah, and Jesus answered those who demanded a sign of him by calling theirs an evil generation and pointing them to the sign of Jonah (Matthew 12:38–39). When God himself offers a sign, as he did to Ahaz, asking for it is simply taking him at his word, and refusing it is the real failure of faith.
The house of David wearies God
“And he said, Hear ye now, O house of David.” The speaker is Isaiah, bringing God’s word, and “hear ye now” demands the full attention of the king and his court. The address widens from Ahaz to his whole line. The word for house, bayith, comes from a root meaning to build, and here it means the royal family, David’s dynasty, and through it the kingdom of Judah. God had promised David that his house, his kingdom and his throne would be established for ever (2 Samuel 7:16), in the covenant set out in 2 Samuel 7. The heirs of that promise were meant to lead the people in trusting the God who made it, and Ahaz, a son of David, was betraying that trust.
The rebuke comes as two questions. “Is it a small thing for you to weary men” points to what Ahaz had already done. The verb lâʼâh means to be tired out, exhausted, even disgusted, and his fearful policies and political scheming had already worn out the people around him, his advisers and his subjects alike. “But will ye weary my God also?” lifts the charge as high as it can go. If wearing out men is serious, wearing out God while he is offering help is far worse. The word for God is ʼĕlôhîym, plural in form and used with a singular verb, the supreme God and Creator, and Isaiah calls him “my God”.
The almighty God has strength without limit, so “weary” is said of him in human terms. It means that persistent unbelief, in the face of his plain offers of help, grieves him and tries his patience, the way a loving parent is grieved when a child he is trying to help keeps turning him away. God cares how his people answer him. Psalm 78 remembers how often Israel grieved him in the wilderness and tested him (Psalm 78:40–41), the letter to the Hebrews warns us against hardening our hearts as they did (Hebrews 3:7–11), and Paul writes that “whatsoever is not of faith is sin” (Romans 14:23). Unbelief is an offence against God’s character, because it treats his word as unreliable.
The Lord himself gives the sign
“Therefore the Lord himself shall give you a sign.” Because Ahaz refused to ask, God gives a sign of his own choosing. Here the word for Lord is ʼĂdônây, an emphatic form of ʼâdôn, master, used as a name for God that stresses his sovereign authority. “The Lord himself” makes it plain that this sign comes from the supreme God, acting on his own initiative against a king’s resistance. The sign, ʼôwth, is the same word as in verse 11, and it carries both a promise of deliverance for Judah and a rebuke for Ahaz’s lack of faith. God’s own sign proves greater than anything Ahaz could have asked.
“Behold” (hinnēh) calls for attention. “A virgin shall conceive, and bear a son” uses hâreh, to conceive, yâlad, to bear, and bên, a son. A child with a meaningful name was a familiar way for a prophet to give a sign, since the name could carry a message and the child’s age could mark a length of time, and verses 15 and 16 use this child’s age in just that way.
Virgin or young woman?
The Hebrew word is ʻalmâh. Strong’s defines it as “a lass (as veiled or private); damsel, maid, virgin”, and it refers to a young woman of marriageable age. In a society that expected chastity before marriage it carried the sense of virginity, though the word on its own is broader than that. When the Old Testament was translated into Greek, in the version called the Septuagint, centuries before Christ was born, the translators rendered ʻalmâh in this verse by parthenos, the Greek word for a virgin.
Matthew quotes Isaiah in that form. After telling how Mary conceived by the Holy Spirit and how Joseph was troubled when he learned she was with child, he says that all this happened to fulfil what the Lord had spoken by the prophet, and he gives the name with its meaning, God with us (Matthew 1:22–23). Luke records Mary asking the angel how this could be, and Gabriel’s answer that the child would be conceived by the Holy Spirit’s power, apart from any man (Luke 1:34–35). So the word Isaiah was given, and the way Scripture itself reads it, both point to a birth only God could bring about: a virgin conceiving a son.
Was there also a child in Ahaz’s day?
Believers who agree that Jesus is the Immanuel of this verse differ on whether God also gave Ahaz a child in his own time. Some hold that the promise had a near fulfilment as well as its full one. A young woman known to Ahaz, perhaps Isaiah’s own wife, would bear a son, and before he was old enough to tell good from evil the threat from Syria and Israel would be gone. Isaiah’s son Maher-shalal-hash-baz, whose birth in the next chapter comes with a similar timetable for the fall of the two kingdoms (Isaiah 8:3–4), is the child most often named. On this view the near fulfilment confirmed God’s word to Ahaz’s generation and pointed ahead to a far greater one. Others read the verse as a prophecy of Christ alone, and take the child of verses 15 and 16 as the same child. Both agree that Matthew gives the full meaning of the verse, and that the son born of a virgin is Jesus.
Immanuel, God with us
ʻImmânûwʼêl joins ʻim, with, to ʼêl, God, and means “God with us”. The name is a promise in itself. To a frightened kingdom it said that God was present among them in the middle of their danger, to protect them and to deliver them, whatever their king had done. In Jesus the name came true in the fullest sense. The Word was made flesh and dwelt among us (John 1:14), so that God was with us in our own nature, and his given name, Jesus, means that the LORD saves (Matthew 1:21–23). The promise of a son who would save goes back to God’s first promise of a Redeemer in Eden (Genesis 3:15), and the risen Christ closes Matthew’s Gospel with the same promise of his presence: “lo, I am with you alway, even unto the end of the world” (Matthew 28:20).
Butter and honey until he can choose
“Butter and honey shall he eat.” The word for butter, chemʼâh, from a root suggesting something thick, means curdled milk, curds or cheese, and so butter. Honey, dᵉbash, from a root meaning to be gummy, is honey. These are foods from the herds and from the wild, the food people could still find when war had stopped the farming of the fields. Elsewhere milk and honey stand for plenty, as in the promise of “a land flowing with milk and honey” (Exodus 3:8). In the setting of Isaiah 7, where the coming Assyrian invasion will leave Judah itself desolate, they point to a land gone back to a simple life of herding and gathering. So the diet speaks of hardship and provision together. Even in a ruined land God would keep his people fed, and the old words about milk and honey hold out a hope of restoration beyond the judgment.
“That he may know to refuse the evil, and choose the good.” The verb yâdaʻ, to know, at root means to ascertain by seeing, and it covers experience and recognition as well as understanding. The phrase is a Hebrew idiom for reaching the age of moral discernment, when a child can tell right from wrong and make his own choices. Moses spoke of the little children of Israel in the same terms, as too young yet to know good from evil (Deuteronomy 1:39). The point of the clause is the time it marks, as the next verse makes clear.
Scripture values that growth in discernment. Proverbs promises that wisdom brings understanding of righteousness, judgment and equity (Proverbs 2:9), and Hebrews says that the mature, by long practice, are trained to discern both good and evil (Hebrews 5:14). Growing in faith means learning to refuse evil and choose good in the choices of daily life, with the help of God’s Spirit and his word.
The verse also points to Christ, the true Immanuel, in his humble beginnings and his true humanity. He was born and laid in a manger (Luke 2:7), and as a boy he grew in wisdom and stature (Luke 2:52). He was tempted as we are, yet without sin (Hebrews 4:15), and his whole life was a choosing of the good, most of all in Gethsemane, where he chose his Father’s will over his own in the face of terrible suffering (Matthew 26:39).
Both kings gone before the child is grown
“For before the child shall know to refuse the evil, and choose the good.” The word for child, naʻar, means a boy anywhere from infancy to youth, and it can also mean a servant. Here it is a young child, and the measure is short. The age when a child first tells good from bad comes at around two to five years old, so Ahaz is being told that the danger will be over within a few years. A child’s growth was an everyday measure that anyone in his generation could watch.
“The land that thou abhorrest shall be forsaken of both her kings.” The word for land, ʼădâmâh, often means soil or ground, and here it means a country or territory. The land Ahaz dreaded is Syria and Israel, the home of the two kings who had come against him, and “forsaken of both her kings” means that both thrones would be emptied and their power broken.
It happened as God said. Tiglath-pileser III, king of Assyria, took Damascus, the capital of Syria, and killed Rezin around 732 BC (2 Kings 16:9). Assyria took cities of Israel and carried many Israelites away captive (2 Kings 15:29), and Pekah was killed in a conspiracy at about the same time (2 Kings 15:29–30). Isaiah sets the same kind of timetable at the birth of his own son, before the Assyrian conquest (Isaiah 8:3–4). A near promise kept so exactly was meant to build trust, because the God who foretold events a few years off would surely keep his far greater promise of Immanuel.
Christ, the true Immanuel, triumphs over enemies far greater than Rezin and Pekah, which are sin, death and the devil. He is the King of whom the angel said, “of his kingdom there shall be no end” (Luke 1:33).
Christ, the sign Ahaz refused
The God who spoke again to Ahaz has spoken his fullest word in his Son. Hebrews says that God, who spoke in times past to the fathers by the prophets, has in these last days spoken to us by his Son (Hebrews 1:1–2), and John calls Jesus the Word who was with God and was God (John 1:1), the Word made flesh (John 1:14).
The offer of a sign as deep as the grave or as high as heaven finds its answer in him. Paul writes that Christ descended into the lower parts of the earth and ascended far above all heavens (Ephesians 4:9–10). He went down into death and the grave, and he was raised and exalted to the right hand of the Father, so that God’s saving power reaches from the lowest depth to the highest height.
Where Ahaz, a son of David, wearied God, Jesus, the true Son of David, could say that he always does what pleases the Father (John 8:29). He is the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world (John 1:29). God gave the sign of Immanuel to an unbelieving king, and he gives his Son to sinners: “God commendeth his love toward us, in that, while we were yet sinners, Christ died for us” (Romans 5:8). Through Christ we are called to enter God’s rest by faith, where Israel in the wilderness hardened their hearts and fell short of it (Hebrews 4:1–11). The call of the gospel is simple: “Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and thou shalt be saved” (Acts 16:31).
Taking God at his word
Ahaz’s story comes close to home for anyone who has been afraid. He had God’s promise, and when God offered to confirm it he chose the help he could see and arrange for himself, and he said so in religious words. We can do the same, calling our caution humility when it is really distrust. The LORD’s patience with Ahaz shows that he speaks again to people who are slow to trust him, and today he speaks to us in his written word.
We also have the sign. Ahaz was offered any wonder from the depth to the height, and we have been given more than he could have asked: God himself with us in his Son, born of a virgin, crucified, risen and reigning. When the threats around you shake you like trees in the wind, you can rest on the word Ahaz was given, “be quiet, fear not”, because the Lord who promised Immanuel kept that promise, and he keeps his promise to be with his people always.
Isaiah 7:10
“Moreover the LORD spake again”
The KJV marks a new paragraph here. This is a second meeting with the same king, after the first message of verses 1 to 9 had been met with fear, and the initiative is God’s alone.
“unto Ahaz, saying,”
The word is addressed personally to the king who answered for Judah’s course, and “saying” opens the offer that follows.
Isaiah 7:11
“Ask thee a sign”
Ahaz may name the sign himself. God leaves the choice of wonder to the king.
“of the LORD thy God;”
The covenant name, with “thy”, makes the offer personal. The God who offers is the God of David’s house.
“ask it either in the depth,”
The depths of the earth and the grave, the lowest and most hidden place there is.
“or in the height above.”
The sky and the heavens. With “the depth” it takes in all creation, so any sign at all was on offer.
Isaiah 7:12
“But Ahaz said,”
“But” sets the king’s reply against God’s offer, a turning point for Ahaz and for Judah.
“I will not ask,”
A flat refusal of what God told him to do, and with it a refusal of the assurance God was holding out.
“neither will I tempt the LORD.”
The excuse echoes Deuteronomy 6:16, but God himself had invited the test, so the words hide unbelief.
Isaiah 7:13
“And he said,”
Isaiah speaks, as God’s messenger.
“Hear ye now, O house of David;”
“Ye” is plural. The rebuke reaches past Ahaz to the court and the royal line that held God’s promise to David.
“Is it a small thing for you to weary men,”
A question with an obvious answer. Ahaz’s fearful rule had already worn out his people.
“but will ye weary my God also?”
The second question raises the offence from men to God, whose offered help Ahaz has just refused.
Isaiah 7:14
“Therefore the Lord himself shall give you a sign;”
“Therefore” ties the sign to Ahaz’s refusal. The title here is ʼĂdônây, the sovereign Master, who acts without waiting to be asked.
“Behold, a virgin shall conceive,”
“Behold” calls the house of David to look. The word is ʻalmâh, rendered parthenos, virgin, in the Greek and in Matthew 1:23.
“and bear a son,”
The sign is a birth, a son whose coming carries God’s message.
“and shall call his name Immanuel.”
The mother names the child, and the name is the message: God with us.
Isaiah 7:15 This verse
“Butter and honey shall he eat,”
Curds and wild honey, the food of herds and wild places in a land laid waste by war.
“that he may know to refuse the evil, and choose the good.”
The age of moral discernment, the clock by which verse 16 measures God’s deliverance.
Isaiah 7:16
“For before the child shall know to refuse the evil, and choose the good,”
“For” explains why the child’s age matters. Within a few years of early childhood the danger will be over.
“the land that thou abhorrest”
One “land” stands for both hostile kingdoms, Syria and Israel, the source of Ahaz’s fear.
“shall be forsaken of both her kings.”
Rezin and Pekah were both dead within a few years, as 2 Kings 16:9 and 2 Kings 15:29–30 record.
Last revised