Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
Then asked we those elders, and said unto them thus, Who commanded you to build this house, and to make up these walls?
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
Then H116 asked H7593 we those H479 elders H7868, and said H560 unto them thus H3660, Who H4479 commanded H7761 H2942 you to build H1124 this H1836 house H1005, and to make up H3635 these H1836 walls H846?
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
of their leaders. We asked them, 'Who gave you permission to rebuild this house and finish this wall?'
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
So we questioned the elders and asked, “Who authorized you to rebuild this temple and restore this structure?”
Ask
American Standard Version
Then asked we those elders, and said unto them thus, Who gave you a decree to build this house, and to finish this wall?
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
Then we asked those elders, and said to them thus, “Who gave you a decree to build this house, and to finish this wall?”
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
Then asked we those Elders, and sayd vnto them thus, Who hath giuen you commandement to buylde this house, and to lay the foundation of these walles?
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
Then we have asked of these elders, thus we have said to them, Who hath made for you a decree this house to build, and this wall to finish?
Ask
See on the biblical-era map
In the KJVVerse 12,144 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

Ezra 5:9 records the pivotal moment when Tatnai, the Persian governor of Trans-Euphrates, and his accompanying officials formally interrogate the Jewish elders in Jerusalem regarding the resumed construction of the Second Temple. This direct inquiry challenges the very foundation of the building project, demanding to know the specific authority and command under which the work proceeds, particularly concerning the reconstruction of the temple structure and its protective walls. This confrontation sets the stage for a critical bureaucratic and theological test for the returning exiles, necessitating a defense of their actions before imperial power.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: Ezra 5:9 is situated within the broader narrative of the post-exilic return and the rebuilding of the Second Temple, a central theme in the book of Ezra. The initial phase of rebuilding, detailed in Ezra 3, saw the foundation laid, but subsequent opposition from local adversaries (as described in Ezra 4:1-5) led to a significant cessation of work, which lasted for approximately sixteen years, until the second year of Darius I (Ezra 4:24). The narrative of Ezra 5 marks a crucial turning point, as the prophetic ministries of Haggai and Zechariah (Ezra 5:1-2) stir the people and their leaders, Zerubbabel and Jeshua, to resume construction. Verse 9 specifically captures the moment when this renewed activity draws the attention of the Persian imperial administration, leading to a formal investigation by Governor Tatnai and his colleagues. This interrogation is not merely a disruption but a catalyst that ultimately leads to the rediscovery and reaffirmation of Cyrus's original decree, thereby validating the project.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: The events of Ezra 5:9 unfold during the reign of Darius I Hystaspes (522-486 BC), a period of vast imperial administration for the Persian Empire. The empire was meticulously organized, with provinces like "Trans-Euphrates" (Abar-Nahara in Aramaic), which encompassed Judah, governed by satraps or high-ranking officials such as Tatnai. These governors were charged with maintaining peace, collecting tribute, and ensuring strict adherence to imperial decrees. Any large-scale public works, especially those involving significant resources or with potential political implications, like the rebuilding of a national temple, would necessitate official sanction from the central government. The Jewish community, recently returned exiles, existed as a vassal people under Persian dominion. Their actions were subject to imperial oversight, and any perceived unauthorized construction could be interpreted as an act of defiance or a move towards greater autonomy, thereby warranting a thorough and immediate investigation by the Persian authorities. The temple, beyond its religious significance, was a symbol of national identity and sovereignty, making its reconstruction a matter of imperial concern.
  • Key Themes: Ezra 5:9 contributes significantly to several profound themes within the post-exilic narrative. Firstly, it underscores the theme of Divine Providence Amidst Human Opposition. The Jewish elders are acting on what they believe is God's command, yet they are confronted by a powerful human authority demanding justification. This tension highlights God's sovereign hand working not around, but often through, the complexities of human governance and opposition to achieve His purposes. Secondly, the verse emphasizes Perseverance in Faith. The rebuilding project had already faced significant resistance and a prolonged halt. Tatnai's inquiry represents a new, high-stakes bureaucratic and political hurdle. The Jews' steadfastness in continuing the work, even under the threat of imperial displeasure, exemplifies their unwavering faith and commitment to God's call. Lastly, the verse brings to the forefront the theme of Legitimacy and Official Sanction. Tatnai's pointed question, "Who commanded you?", implicitly demands proof of authorization, setting in motion the crucial process that will lead to the rediscovery and reaffirmation of Cyrus's original decree. This demonstrates the importance of both divine promises and human legal frameworks in the outworking of God's redemptive plan, ultimately leading to the project's completion under renewed imperial protection, as seen in Ezra 6:1-12.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • Commanded (Aramaic, ṭᵉʻêm', H2942): This Aramaic term (H2942) refers to an authoritative decree, judgment, or command. In the context of Persian administration, it signifies a formal, binding edict issued by a king or high-ranking official. Tatnai's question is not seeking a mere suggestion or request, but a legitimate, official order that grants the authority to undertake such a significant and costly project. It implies a search for a formal imperial edict that would render the building legal under Persian law, highlighting the bureaucratic precision of the empire.
  • House (Aramaic, bayith', H1005): While literally meaning "house" (H1005), in this specific context, it unequivocally refers to the Temple in Jerusalem. This term is consistently used throughout Ezra to denote the sacred dwelling place of God, the central edifice of worship for the Jewish people. The inquiry concerning "this house" specifically targets the religious sanctuary, acknowledging its profound significance and the sheer magnitude of its reconstruction, which would naturally draw imperial attention.
  • Walls (Aramaic, ʼushsharnâʼ', H846): This Aramaic word (H846) denotes the "walls" or the complete, upright structure of a building. In this verse, it specifically implies the finished and enclosing elements of the temple edifice. The KJV's "make up these walls" captures the sense of completing the entire structure, not merely laying the foundation. This suggests that the building was visibly progressing beyond just the initial stages, with the walls rising, thereby prompting the governor's immediate and formal inquiry into the project's legitimacy.

Verse Breakdown

  • "Then asked we those elders, and said unto them thus": This opening clause establishes the formal and official nature of the encounter. "We" refers to Tatnai, the Persian governor of Trans-Euphrates, and his accompanying officials, acting as authorized representatives of the imperial government. The "elders" are the Jewish leaders, including Zerubbabel and Jeshua, who are directly responsible for overseeing the temple rebuilding. The phrase "said unto them thus" indicates a direct, formal interrogation, setting a serious and demanding tone for the interaction, emphasizing the authority of the questioners.
  • "Who commanded you to build this house": This is the central and most critical part of Tatnai's inquiry. He is directly demanding to know the ultimate source of authority for the temple construction. This question probes the legitimacy of the entire project from the perspective of Persian imperial law. Was there a royal decree, a formal edict from the king? Or was it an internal Jewish decision made without imperial sanction? The answer to this question would determine whether the project was considered legal or an act of unauthorized construction, potentially even rebellion.
  • "and to make up these walls?": This second part of the question specifically references the completion of the temple structure, including its enclosing and protective walls. The inclusion of "walls" emphasizes that the work was visibly advanced beyond the foundation stage, indicating a substantial and progressing construction project that had become impossible to ignore. This detail also hints at the potential political sensitivity of rebuilding any defensive or enclosing structures, even those associated with a religious site, which could be misconstrued as an attempt to fortify the city.

Literary Devices

Ezra 5:9 primarily employs Interrogation as its key literary device, framing the interaction as a direct challenge and demand for accountability from the Persian authorities. The questions posed by Tatnai and his associates are not rhetorical but genuine inquiries designed to elicit specific information regarding the authorization behind the rebuilding project. This interrogation serves to heighten the Dramatic Tension in the narrative, placing the Jewish leaders in a precarious position where they must articulate their divine and historical mandate to a powerful secular authority. Furthermore, the use of Direct Speech ("Who commanded you...?") lends immediacy and authenticity to the encounter, allowing the reader to experience the precise nature of the challenge faced by the exiles. The focus on "this house" and "these walls" also subtly employs Synecdoche, where the parts (the temple structure and its walls) represent the whole project of rebuilding Jerusalem and its central sanctuary, thereby implying the broader political and religious implications of the work for the Persian Empire.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

Ezra 5:9 encapsulates the recurring biblical theme of God's people facing scrutiny and opposition from secular powers when pursuing divine mandates. It highlights the inherent tension between earthly authority and heavenly commission, demonstrating that God's work often proceeds not in isolation, but within the complex and often challenging realities of political landscapes. Yet, it also subtly foreshadows God's providential hand working through these very challenges, as Tatnai's inquiry ultimately serves as the catalyst for the rediscovery of Cyrus's decree, which validates the Jews' work and ensures its completion under renewed imperial protection. This verse underscores the importance of legitimate authority, whether divine or humanly sanctioned, for large-scale endeavors, and the necessity for God's people to be prepared to articulate their purpose and source of power with wisdom and integrity.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

Ezra 5:9 serves as a profound reminder that undertaking God's work often involves navigating external scrutiny, bureaucratic hurdles, and even direct opposition from those in authority. Just as the Jewish elders were questioned about their authority and purpose for rebuilding the temple, believers today may encounter similar challenges when pursuing kingdom initiatives in various spheres of life, be it ministry, business, or social action. This verse calls us to be prepared to articulate the "why" and "by whose authority" we serve, grounding our actions firmly in God's divine mandate and, where appropriate, in lawful human processes. It encourages unwavering perseverance in the face of opposition, knowing that God's ultimate plan will prevail, even when it seems to be under threat from external forces. Furthermore, it underscores the importance of clear, accountable leadership within spiritual endeavors, providing steadfast direction and a reliable point of contact for both internal community members and external stakeholders. Our response to such challenges should be marked by wisdom, integrity, and a steadfast reliance on God's sovereign hand, trusting that He uses even the inquiries of adversaries to advance His eternal purposes and bring about His desired outcomes.

Questions for Reflection

  • In what areas of your life or ministry are you currently facing scrutiny or opposition for doing what you believe God has called you to do?
  • How prepared are you to articulate the "who" and "why" behind your spiritual endeavors to those who question you, whether they are authorities, colleagues, or family?
  • What lessons can you draw from the Jewish elders' situation about persevering in God's work despite external pressures and bureaucratic challenges?

FAQ

Why was Tatnai, the governor, asking these questions?

Answer: Tatnai, as the Persian governor of the province of Trans-Euphrates (which included Judah), was responsible for maintaining order, collecting taxes, and ensuring that all activities within his jurisdiction complied with imperial law. Large-scale construction projects, especially those like the temple which could be perceived as having political implications (e.g., a move towards greater autonomy or a fortified city), would naturally draw the attention of the authorities. His questions in Ezra 5:9 were an official inquiry to determine if the temple rebuilding had proper authorization from the Persian king, or if it was an unauthorized act that needed to be halted. This was standard bureaucratic procedure within the vast and meticulously organized Persian Empire, ensuring central control and preventing potential rebellion.

Was the temple rebuilding project truly unauthorized?

Answer: No, the temple rebuilding was not unauthorized. It had been explicitly sanctioned by a decree from King Cyrus the Great, issued at the very beginning of the post-exilic period, as recorded in Ezra 1:1-4. However, this decree had been issued many years prior (around 538 BC), and the work had been halted for a significant period (until 520 BC) due to local opposition, as mentioned in Ezra 4:24. When the work resumed, spurred by the prophets Haggai and Zechariah (Ezra 5:1-2), the current Persian officials, like Tatnai, were likely unaware of the original decree or needed to verify its validity for their records. The inquiry in Ezra 5:9 ultimately led to a search of the royal archives, where Cyrus's decree was indeed found and reaffirmed by King Darius I, ensuring the project's completion under imperial protection (Ezra 6:1-12).

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

Ezra 5:9, with its emphasis on authority and the building of God's "house" and "walls," finds profound Christ-centered fulfillment in the person and redemptive work of Jesus Christ. The earthly temple, whose rebuilding was questioned, was a type and shadow of Christ Himself, who boldly declared, "Destroy this temple, and in three days I will raise it up," referring to the temple of His body (John 2:19-21). Jesus is the ultimate "house" of God, the true dwelling place of God among humanity, as the Word who became flesh and "dwelt among us" (John 1:14). Furthermore, the question "Who commanded you...?" profoundly resonates with the repeated challenges to Jesus's authority by the religious leaders of His day, who frequently demanded, "By what authority are you doing these things, and who gave you this authority?" (Matthew 21:23). Unlike the Jewish elders who had to appeal to an earthly king's decree, Jesus's authority was inherently divine, directly from the Father, as He testified, "The Son can do nothing of his own accord, but only what he sees the Father doing" (John 5:19). He is not merely building a physical structure but establishing His spiritual temple, the Church, which He promised to build and against which "the gates of hell shall not prevail" (Matthew 16:18). Believers, as living stones, are being built into this spiritual house, with Christ Himself as the chief cornerstone, forming a "holy priesthood" for God's dwelling (1 Peter 2:5 and Ephesians 2:20-22). Thus, the inquiry in Ezra 5:9, initially a challenge to an earthly building project, ultimately points to the supreme and unquestionable authority of Christ in establishing His eternal, spiritual dwelling place, the Church.

Copy as

Commentary on Ezra 5 verses 3–17

I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points

We have here, I. The cognizance which their neighbours soon took of the reviving of this good work. A jealous eye, it seems, they had upon them, and no sooner did the Spirit of God stir up the friends of the temple to appear for it than the evil spirit stirred up its enemies to appear against it. While the people built and ceiled their own houses their enemies gave them no molestation (Hag 1:4), though the king's order was to put a stop to the building of the city (Ezr 4:21); but when they fell to work again at the temple then the alarm was taken, and all heads were at work to hinder them, Ezr 5:3, Ezr 5:4. The adversaries are here named: Tatnai and Shethar-boznai. The governors we read of (ch. 4) were, it is probable, displaced at the beginning of this reign, as is usual. It is the policy of princes often to change their deputies, proconsuls, and rulers of provinces. These, though real enemies to the building of the temple, were men of better temper than the other, and made some conscience of telling truth. If all men have not faith (Th2 3:2), it is well some have, and a sense of honour. The church's enemies are not all equally wicked and unreasonable. The historian begins to relate what passed between the builders and those inquisitors (Ezr 5:3, Ezr 5:4), but breaks off his account, and refers to the ensuing copy of the letter they sent to the king, where the same appears more fully and at large, which he began to abridge (Ezr 5:4), or make an extract out of, though, upon second thoughts, he inserted the whole.

II. The care which the divine Providence took of this good work (Ezr 5:5): The eye of their God was upon the elders of the Jews, who were active in the work, so that their enemies could not cause them to cease, as they would have done, till the matter came to Darius. They desired they would only cease till they had instructions from the king about it. But they would not so much as yield them that, for the eye of God was upon them, even their God. And, 1. That baffled their enemies, infatuated and enfeebled them, and protected the builders from their malicious designs. While we are employed in God's work we are taken under his special protection; his eye is upon us for good, seven eyes upon one stone in his temple; see Zac 3:9; Zac 4:10. 2. That quickened them. The elders of the Jews saw the eye of God upon them, to observe what they did and own them in what they did well, and then they had courage enough to face their enemies and to go on vigorously with their work, notwithstanding all the opposition they met with. our eye upon God, observing his eye upon us, will keep us to our duty and encourage us in it when the difficulties are ever so discouraging.

III. The account they sent to the king of this matter, in which we may observe,

1.How fully the elders of the Jews gave the Samaritans an account of their proceedings. They, finding them both busy and prosperous, that all hands were at work to run up this building and that it went on rapidly, put these questions to them: - "By what authority do you do these things, and who gave you that authority? Who set you to work? Have you that which will bear you out?" To this they answered that they had sufficient warrant to do what they did; for, (1.) "We are the servants of the God of heaven and earth. The God we worship is not a local deity, and therefore we cannot be charged with making a faction, or setting up a sect, in building this temple to his honour: but we pay our homage to a God on whom the whole creation depends, and therefore ought to be protected and assisted by all and hindered by none." It is the wisdom as well as duty of kings to countenance the servants of the God of heaven. (2.) "We have a prescription to this house; it was built for the honour of our God by Solomon many ages ago. It is no novel invention of our own; we are but raising the foundations of many generations," Isa 58:12. (3.) "It was to punish us for our sins that we were, for a time, put out of the possession of this house; not because the gods of the nations had prevailed against our God, but because we had provoked him (Ezr 5:12), for which he delivered us and our temple into the hands of the king of Babylon, but never intended thereby to put a final period to our religion. We were only suspended for a time, not deprived for ever." (4.) "We have the royal decree of Cyrus to justify us and bear us out in what we do. He not only permitted and allowed us, but charged and commanded us to build this house (Ezr 5:13), and to build it in its place (Ezr 5:15), the same place where it had stood before." He ordered this, not only in compassion to the Jews, but in veneration of their God, saying, He is the God. He also delivered the vessels of the temple to one whom he entrusted to see them restored to their ancient place and use, Ezr 5:14. And they had these to show in confirmation of what they alleged. (5.) "The building was begun according to this order as soon as ever we had returned, so that we have not forfeited the benefit of the order for want of pursuing it in time; still it has been in building, but, because we have met with opposition, it is not finished." But, observe, they mention not the falsehood and malice of the former governors, nor make any complaint of them, though they had cause enough, to teach us not to render bitterness for bitterness, nor the most just reproach for that which is most unjust, but to think it enough if we can obtain fair treatment for the future, without an invidious reference to former injuries, Ezr 5:16. This is the account they give of their proceedings, not asking what authority they had to examine them, nor upbraiding them with their idolatry, and superstitions, and medley religion. Let us learn hence with meekness and fear to give a reason of the hope that is in us (Pe1 3:15), rightly to understand, and then readily to declare, what we do in God's service and why we do it.

2.How fairly the Samaritans represented this to the king. (1.) They called the temple at Jerusalem the house of the great God (Ezr 5:8); for though the Samaritans, as it should seem, had yet gods many and lords many, they owned the God of Israel to be the great God, who is above all gods. "It is the house of the great God, and therefore we dare not oppose the building of it without orders from thee." (2.) They told him truly what was done, not stating, as their predecessors did, that they were fortifying the city as if they intended war, but only that they were rearing the temple as those that intended worship, Ezr 5:8. (3.) They fully represented their plea, told him what they had to say for themselves, and were willing that the cause should be set in a true light. (4.) They left it to the king to consult the records whether Cyrus had indeed made such a decree, and then to give directions as he should think fit, Ezr 5:17. We have reason to think that if Artaxerxes, in the foregoing chapter, had had the Jews' cause as fairly represented to him as it was here to Darius, he would not have ordered the work to be hindered. God's people could not be persecuted if they were not belied, could not be baited if they were not dressed up in bears' skins. Let but the cause of God and truth be fairly stated, and fairly heard, and it will keep its ground.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 3–17. Public domain.
Copy as
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Ezra 5:9 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.