TRV
See on the biblical-era map
Study This Verse
Commentary on Ezra 10 verses 15–44
The method of proceeding in this matter being concluded on, and the congregation dismissed, that each in his respective place might gain and give intelligence to facilitate the matter, we are here told, 1. Who were the persons that undertook to manage the matter and bring the causes regularly before the commissioners - Jonathan and Jahaziah, two active men, whether of the priests or of the people does not appear; probably they were the men that made that proposal (Ezr 10:13, Ezr 10:14) and were therefore the fittest to see it pursued; two honest Levites were joined with them, and helped them, Ezr 10:15. Dr. Lightfoot gives a contrary sense of this: only (or nevertheless) Jonathan and Jahaziah stood against this matter (which reading the original will very well bear), and these two Levites helped them in opposing it, either the thing itself or this method of proceeding. It was strange if a work of this kind was carried on and met with no opposition. 2. Who were the commissioners that sat upon this matter. Ezra was president, and with him certain chief men of the fathers who were qualified with wisdom and zeal above others for this service, Ezr 10:16. It was happy for them that they had such a man as Ezra to head them; they could not have done it well without his direction, yet he would not do it without their concurrence. 3. How long they were about it. They began the first day of the tenth month to examine the matter (Ezr 10:16), which was but ten days after this method was proposed (Ezr 10:9), and they finished in three months, Ezr 10:17. They sat closely and minded their business, otherwise they could not have despatched so many causes as they had before them in so little time; for we may suppose that all who were impeached were fairly asked what cause they could show why they should not be parted, and, if we may judge by other cases, provided the wife were proselyted to the Jewish religion she was not to be put away, the trial of which would require great care. 4. Who the persons were that were found guilty of this crime. Their names are here recorded to their perpetual reproach; many of the priests, nay, of the family of Jeshua, the high priest, were found guilty (Ezr 10:18), though the law had particularly provided, for the preserving of their honour in their marriages, that being holy themselves they should not marry such as were profane, Lev 21:7. Those that should have taught others the law broke it themselves and by their example emboldened others to do likewise. But, having lost their innocency in this matter, they did well to recant and give an example of repentance; for they promised under their hand to put away their strange wives (some think that they made oath to do so with their hands lifted up), and they took the appointed way of obtaining pardon, bringing the ram which was appointed by the law for a trespass offering (Lev 6:6), so owning their guilt and the desert of it, and humbly suing for forgiveness. About 113 in all are here named who had married strange wives, and some of them, it is said (Ezr 10:44), had children by them, which implies that not many of them had, God not crowning those marriages with the blessing of increase. Whether the children were turned off with the mothers, as Shechaniah proposed, does not appear; it should seem not: however it is probable that the wives which were put away were well provided for, according to their rank. One would think this grievance was now thoroughly redressed, yet we meet with it again (Neh 13:23 and Mal 2:11), for such corruptions are easily and insensibly brought in, but not without great difficulty purged out again. The best reformers can but do their endeavour, but, when the Redeemer himself shall come to Sion, he shall effectually turn away ungodliness from Jacob.
Continue studying Ezra 10:22 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
SefariaThe Hebrew text with Rashi and centuries of Jewish commentary.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
SUMMARY
Ezra 10:22 meticulously lists six individuals from the priestly family of Pashur—Elioenai, Maaseiah, Ishmael, Nethaneel, Jozabad, and Elasah—who had taken foreign wives in violation of God's law. This verse is part of a comprehensive register documenting the men who participated in the painful but necessary spiritual reform initiated by Ezra, highlighting both the widespread nature of the sin of intermarriage among the returned exiles, including the priestly class, and their communal commitment to repentance and covenant fidelity.
CONTEXT
Literary Context: Ezra 10:22 is situated within the final chapter of the book of Ezra, which details the practical implementation of the covenant made in response to the widespread sin of intermarriage. Following Ezra's profound prayer of confession and lament in Ezra 9, the people, led by Shecaniah, confessed their sin and proposed a covenant to put away their foreign wives and children (Ezra 10:1-5). Chapter 10 then describes the assembly convened to address the issue, the formation of a commission to investigate each case, and ultimately, the detailed lists of those who had committed this sin and agreed to the separation. This verse, like others in the latter half of the chapter, serves as a solemn record, underscoring the gravity of the offense and the thoroughness of the communal repentance, providing concrete evidence of the reform's painful yet necessary execution.
Historical & Cultural Context: The events of Ezra 10 unfold in Jerusalem during the post-exilic period, roughly in the mid-5th century BC, after the return of the Jewish exiles from Babylon. The community was striving to re-establish itself as a holy nation, distinct from the surrounding pagan peoples. A central tenet of their covenant with God, reiterated throughout the Mosaic Law (e.g., Deuteronomy 7:3-4), was the prohibition against intermarriage with foreign nations. This was not a matter of racial prejudice but a crucial safeguard against idolatry and the dilution of their unique spiritual identity as God's chosen people. The intermarriage threatened the very purity and purpose of their restoration, potentially leading them back into the spiritual apostasy that had caused the Babylonian exile. The family of Pashur, mentioned in this verse, was a prominent priestly lineage (Nehemiah 11:12), making their involvement in this sin particularly egregious and their subsequent repentance a powerful example for the entire community, demonstrating that even spiritual leaders were not exempt from accountability.
Key Themes: This verse, and indeed the entire chapter, powerfully illustrates several key themes central to the post-exilic community's identity and mission. The most prominent is Radical Obedience, as the decision to separate from foreign wives and children was an incredibly painful and socially disruptive act, yet it demonstrated a profound commitment to God's commandments, highlighting that true repentance often demands costly actions. This act was driven by the pursuit of Spiritual Purity, as intermarriage was seen as a direct threat to Israel's unique covenant relationship with Yahweh and a gateway to idolatry, thus jeopardizing the very purpose of their return from exile. The detailed listing of names, including those in Ezra 10:22, emphasizes Accountability and Confession, showcasing both individual and communal responsibility for sin and the public nature of their repentance. Finally, the involvement of prominent priestly families like Pashur's underscores the theme of Leadership by Example, demonstrating that spiritual leaders were not exempt from the sin and were required to model adherence to God's law and repentance. Ezra's initial distress (Ezra 9:3) and the subsequent covenant (Ezra 10:3) set the stage for this painful but necessary reform.
EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS
Key Word Analysis
Verse Breakdown
Literary Devices
The primary literary device employed in Ezra 10:22, and indeed throughout much of Ezra 10, is the List or Register. This meticulous cataloging of names serves several crucial purposes: it provides a historical record, emphasizing the factual nature and thoroughness of the reform; it underscores the widespread nature of the problem, demonstrating that many individuals, even from prominent families, were involved; and crucially, it highlights individual Accountability. Each name represents a person who had violated the covenant and was now participating in the painful act of repentance. The Repetition of such lists throughout the chapter reinforces the pervasive nature of the sin and the comprehensive scope of the purification process. While not a direct literary device, the act of naming also carries a powerful Symbolism, representing the painful but necessary act of cutting off that which compromises spiritual purity, a theme that resonates throughout the book and underscores the cost of true covenant renewal.
THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS
Ezra 10:22, though a simple list of names, is deeply significant for its theological implications regarding covenant fidelity, holiness, and the nature of true repentance. The intermarriage with foreign peoples was not merely a social transgression but a direct violation of God's covenant commands, which were designed to preserve Israel's distinct identity as a holy people set apart for Yahweh. The painful decision to put away foreign wives and children underscores that obedience to God sometimes requires radical, costly, and personally agonizing choices. This act was a communal confession of sin and a collective commitment to restore spiritual purity, recognizing that compromise with pagan practices threatened the very existence and purpose of the restored community. It teaches us that genuine repentance involves not just sorrow for sin, but concrete actions to rectify wrong and re-align one's life with divine will, even when those actions are profoundly difficult and carry immense personal cost.
REFLECTION AND APPLICATION
The stark reality presented in Ezra 10:22, where individuals from esteemed families are named for their sin and their costly act of repentance, offers profound lessons for contemporary believers. While the specific cultural and covenantal context of intermarriage with foreign nations is unique to ancient Israel, the underlying principles are timeless. We are called to a radical obedience that prioritizes God's will above personal comfort, social norms, or even deeply cherished relationships that might compromise our spiritual walk. This often involves making difficult choices to separate from influences, relationships, or practices that compromise our spiritual integrity or dilute our commitment to Christ. True repentance is not passive; it demands active steps to turn away from sin and align our lives with God's Word, acknowledging that personal sin impacts the purity and witness of the entire community of faith. The naming of individuals in Ezra reminds us that our faith journey is both deeply personal and communally accountable, requiring each of us to guard our hearts and lives against anything that would draw us away from our covenant relationship with God.
Questions for Reflection
FAQ
Why was intermarriage considered such a severe sin in ancient Israel?
Answer: Intermarriage was not condemned for racial reasons, but for spiritual and theological ones. God had chosen Israel to be a distinct, holy people, a "kingdom of priests and a holy nation" (Exodus 19:6). The primary danger of intermarriage with the surrounding pagan nations was the inevitable assimilation of their idolatrous practices and the dilution of Israel's unique covenant relationship with Yahweh. As explicitly stated in Deuteronomy 7:3-4, the concern was that foreign spouses would "turn your sons away from following me to serve other gods." This compromise threatened the very spiritual identity and purity of the nation, jeopardizing their purpose as God's witness to the world and risking a return to the very apostasy that led to their exile.
Does Ezra 10:22 imply that God condones divorce, or that divorce is always the solution to spiritual compromise?
Answer: This passage must be understood within its specific historical and covenantal context. The "putting away" of foreign wives was a unique, drastic measure taken in a specific post-exilic situation to rectify a widespread, systemic violation of the Mosaic covenant that threatened the very spiritual survival of the community. It was an act of corporate repentance and a re-establishment of covenant purity, not a general endorsement of divorce. The Law itself provided for divorce, but it was never God's ideal (Malachi 2:16). In the New Testament, Jesus clarifies God's original intent for marriage (Matthew 19:6) and sets a higher standard for believers, emphasizing the sanctity and permanence of the marriage bond. The principle for Christians today, as seen in 2 Corinthians 6:14, is to avoid being "unequally yoked" with unbelievers, which implies that believers should marry other believers to ensure spiritual unity and support in their walk with Christ, not necessarily to dissolve existing marriages. The Ezra account is an exceptional case of corporate covenant renewal under specific circumstances.
CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT
The painful but necessary purification described in Ezra 10:22, where the people of Israel separated themselves from defiling foreign influences to restore their covenant purity, powerfully foreshadows the ultimate work of purification accomplished by Jesus Christ. Just as Ezra led Israel to cleanse itself from spiritual compromise, Christ, our great High Priest and perfect "Ezra," came to cleanse His people from the far deeper defilement of sin itself. The separation from foreign wives symbolized the cutting off of anything that would compromise God's relationship with His chosen people. In the New Covenant, Christ achieves this spiritual purity for His bride, the Church, not through a painful physical separation from human relationships, but through His atoning sacrifice on the cross. He "loved the church and gave himself up for her, that he might sanctify her, having cleansed her by the washing of water with the word, so that he might present the church to himself in splendor, without spot or wrinkle or any such thing, that she might be holy and blameless" (Ephesians 5:25-27). The blood of Christ cleanses our consciences from dead works to serve the living God (Hebrews 9:14). Through faith in Him, we are made a "chosen race, a royal priesthood, a holy nation, a people for his own possession" (1 Peter 2:9-10), fulfilling the very purpose of Israel's separation and purity in a spiritual and eternal way, establishing a new covenant where true holiness is found in union with Him.