TRV
See on the biblical-era map
Study This Verse
Public-domain commentary
Matthew Henry
From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry comments on passages, not single verses — this entry covers Ezra 10:15–44.
The method of proceeding in this matter being concluded on, and the congregation dismissed, that each in his respective place might gain and give intelligence to facilitate the matter, we are here told, 1. Who were the persons that undertook to manage the matter and bring the causes regularly before the commissioners - Jonathan and Jahaziah, two active men, whether of the priests or of the people does not appear; probably they were the men that made that proposal (Ezr 10:13, Ezr 10:14) and were therefore the fittest to see it pursued; two honest Levites were joined with them, and helped them, Ezr 10:15. Dr. Lightfoot gives a contrary sense of this: only (or nevertheless) Jonathan and Jahaziah stood against this matter (which reading the original will very well bear), and these two Levites helped them in opposing it, either the thing itself or this method of proceeding. It was strange if a work of this kind was carried on and met with no opposition. 2. Who were the commissioners that sat upon this matter. Ezra was president, and with him certain chief men of the fathers who were qualified with wisdom and zeal above others for this service, Ezr 10:16. It was happy for them that they had such a man as Ezra to head them; they could not have done it well without his direction, yet he would not do it without their concurrence. 3. How long they were about it. They began the first day of the tenth month to examine the matter (Ezr 10:16), which was but ten days after this method was proposed (Ezr 10:9), and they finished in three months, Ezr 10:17. They sat closely and minded their business, otherwise they could not have despatched so many causes as they had before them in so little time; for we may suppose that all who were impeached were fairly asked what cause they could show why they should not be parted, and, if we may judge by other cases, provided the wife were proselyted to the Jewish religion she was not to be put away, the trial of which would require great care. 4. Who the persons were that were found guilty of this crime. Their names are here recorded to their perpetual reproach; many of the priests, nay, of the family of Jeshua, the high priest, were found guilty (Ezr 10:18), though the law had particularly provided, for the preserving of their honour in their marriages, that being holy themselves they should not marry such as were profane, Lev 21:7. Those that should have taught others the law broke it themselves and by their example emboldened others to do likewise. But, having lost their innocency in this matter, they did well to recant and give an example of repentance; for they promised under their hand to put away their strange wives (some think that they made oath to do so with their hands lifted up), and they took the appointed way of obtaining pardon, bringing the ram which was appointed by the law for a trespass offering (Lev 6:6), so owning their guilt and the desert of it, and humbly suing for forgiveness. About 113 in all are here named who had married strange wives, and some of them, it is said (Ezr 10:44), had children by them, which implies that not many of them had, God not crowning those marriages with the blessing of increase. Whether the children were turned off with the mothers, as Shechaniah proposed, does not appear; it should seem not: however it is probable that the wives which were put away were well provided for, according to their rank. One would think this grievance was now thoroughly redressed, yet we meet with it again (Neh 13:23 and Mal 2:11), for such corruptions are easily and insensibly brought in, but not without great difficulty purged out again. The best reformers can but do their endeavour, but, when the Redeemer himself shall come to Sion, he shall effectually turn away ungodliness from Jacob.
Continue studying Ezra 10:21 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
SefariaThe Hebrew text with Rashi and centuries of Jewish commentary.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
Summary
Ezra 10:21 meticulously lists five individuals from the "sons of Harim" who participated in a solemn covenant to divorce their foreign wives and children. This verse is a precise entry within a comprehensive register of men who, under Ezra's leadership, committed to a radical act of corporate repentance and spiritual purification. It underscores the personal accountability and the communal commitment required to restore covenant fidelity with God after the Babylonian exile, highlighting the pervasive nature of the sin of intermarriage and the painful but necessary steps taken to address it.
Context
Literary Context
Ezra 10:21 is situated within the climactic tenth chapter of the book of Ezra, which chronicles the community's decisive response to the widespread sin of intermarriage with foreign women. This chapter immediately follows Ezra's profound prayer of confession and lament in Ezra 9, which deeply moved the people. Prompted by Shecaniah's proposal, the assembly resolves to make a covenant to put away their foreign wives and children, a resolution solidified by an oath (Ezra 10:1-5). Ezra then convenes all the returned exiles in Jerusalem, where they agree to this difficult measure after a period of deliberation (Ezra 10:6-15). The remainder of the chapter, from Ezra 10:18-44, provides a meticulous and sobering list of the heads of families and individuals who had committed this sin and complied with the decree. Verse 21 specifically identifies five men from the lineage of Harim, demonstrating the meticulous record-keeping and the pervasive nature of the sin, reaching even into prominent families and clans.
Historical & Cultural Context
The events of Ezra 10 unfold in post-exilic Judah, likely around 458 BC, following the second wave of Jewish returnees from Babylon led by the priest-scribe Ezra. The returned exiles faced the immense task of rebuilding their nation, both physically (the temple had been rebuilt, but Jerusalem's walls were still in disrepair) and spiritually, in a land surrounded by pagan peoples. The Mosaic Law, particularly as articulated in Deuteronomy 7:1-4, strictly prohibited intermarriage with the surrounding nations. This prohibition was not based on racial prejudice but on the spiritual danger posed by such unions, as foreign wives would invariably introduce their gods and customs, leading to syncretism and idolatry. This spiritual corruption had historically been a primary cause of Israel's apostasy and the subsequent Babylonian exile. The severe measures taken in Ezra 10 reflect a desperate recognition that the nation's spiritual survival, its distinctiveness as God's chosen people, and its covenant fidelity depended on radical obedience to this foundational command, preventing a repeat of the idolatry that had led to their initial judgment.
Key Themes
The passage powerfully articulates several core themes central to Israel's post-exilic identity and relationship with God. Firstly, Radical Obedience and Repentance is paramount; the act of putting away wives and children, though agonizingly difficult, demonstrated a profound commitment to God's law above personal comfort or social ties, highlighting the seriousness of their repentance. This act underscored that genuine repentance often demands costly, decisive action. Secondly, Corporate Responsibility and Purification is evident; the sin of individuals impacted the entire community, necessitating a collective response to purify the nation and restore its covenant relationship with God. The detailed listing of names, including those in Ezra 10:21, underscores this shared accountability and the communal effort required for spiritual cleansing. Thirdly, the Cost of Disobedience is starkly portrayed; the severe measures taken reveal the grave consequences of violating God's commands, particularly those designed to maintain Israel's distinctiveness and holiness. Finally, the narrative champions the Centrality of God's Law (Torah) as the indispensable foundation for the community's life, identity, and spiritual well-being, emphasizing that adherence to it was not merely ceremonial but deeply impacted their social, moral, and spiritual fabric, as also seen in Nehemiah 8.
Exposition and Analysis
Key Word Analysis
This term, H1121, denotes a male offspring, but in a broader sense, it can refer to a descendant, a member of a family or clan, or even one who embodies a particular quality or condition (e.g., "sons of Belial"). In this context, "sons of Harim" indicates a specific lineage or family group within the returned exiles, highlighting that the intermarriage problem was not confined to isolated individuals but had permeated established family structures.
Meaning "snub-nosed," refers to a specific priestly family or clan that had returned from exile (Ezra 2:39). The inclusion of individuals from this lineage underscores that the sin of intermarriage was widespread, affecting even those from prominent or religious backgrounds. It highlights that no segment of the community, even those with a sacred calling, was immune from the spiritual compromise that had infiltrated the returned exiles.
Meaning "work of Jah" or "deed of Yahweh." This name, common in the Old Testament, carries a poignant irony in this context. While the name itself points to divine activity, the individual bearing it was engaged in an act contrary to God's will. His inclusion in the list of those who repented signifies that even those whose names proclaimed God's work had strayed, yet through their painful act of repentance, they participated in God's work of purification and restoration.
Verse Breakdown
"And of the sons of Harim;"
This introductory phrase precisely identifies the specific family or clan from which the following individuals originated. The "sons of Harim" were a significant group among the returned exiles, and their presence in this list indicates the pervasive nature of the intermarriage problem, affecting various segments of the community, including those of priestly descent. This detail emphasizes that the sin was not confined to a few isolated cases but was a widespread issue requiring a comprehensive and systematic response.
"Maaseiah, and Elijah, and Shemaiah, and Jehiel, and Uzziah."
This precise enumeration of five individuals serves several critical functions within the narrative. Firstly, it highlights personal accountability; each man was individually named and held responsible for his actions, demonstrating that repentance was a personal as well as corporate commitment. Secondly, it underscores the meticulous record-keeping of Ezra's reforms, lending credibility, transparency, and solemnity to the entire process of purification. Thirdly, the very act of listing names publicly would have served as a powerful deterrent for future generations and a public declaration of the community's unwavering commitment to covenant purity. The names themselves, many of which carry theological meanings (e.g., Elijah, "My God is Yahweh"; Shemaiah, "Jah has heard"; Jehiel, "God will live"; Uzziah, "strength of Jah"), add a layer of theological depth, perhaps serving as a silent testimony to the God they had momentarily forsaken but now sought to honor through their difficult act of repentance and obedience.
Literary Devices
The primary literary device at play in Ezra 10:21, and indeed throughout the entire section of Ezra 10:18-44, is List. The meticulous enumeration of names, family by family, serves to emphasize the sheer scope and depth of the problem of intermarriage, demonstrating that it permeated all levels of society. This detailed List provides concrete evidence of the corporate repentance and the personal accountability of those involved, lending a sense of historical veracity and solemnity to the narrative. Furthermore, the Repetition of the phrase "of the sons of..." followed by specific names creates a rhythmic, almost liturgical effect, reinforcing the gravity and systematic nature of the covenant renewal. The act of publicly naming individuals also functions as a form of Symbolism, representing the painful but necessary surgical removal of spiritual impurities from the body of Israel, ensuring its distinctiveness, holiness, and fidelity to God. This detailed record highlights the thoroughness of the purification process and the serious commitment of the community to uphold God's law.
Theological and Thematic Connections
Ezra 10:21, as an integral part of the broader narrative of purification, deeply intersects with the Old Testament's emphasis on covenant fidelity, holiness, and the severe consequences of spiritual compromise. The radical action taken by the community under Ezra's leadership underscores the profound seriousness of maintaining a distinct identity as God's people, separated from the idolatrous practices of surrounding nations. This separation was not merely ethnic but fundamentally spiritual, designed to preserve the purity of worship and the integrity of the covenant relationship with Yahweh. The narrative serves as a powerful reminder that true repentance often demands costly, decisive action to remove anything that hinders one's relationship with God and compromises the community's witness. It highlights that God's standards for His people are unyielding, and disobedience, particularly in matters of spiritual purity and allegiance, carries severe consequences for both individuals and the collective.
Reflection and Application
The difficult and decisive actions recorded in Ezra 10, including the naming of individuals in verse 21, present a challenging but vital lesson for believers today. While the specific command to put away foreign wives was tied to ancient Israel's unique covenantal and historical context, the underlying principles of radical obedience, the pursuit of purity, and the cost of compromise remain profoundly relevant. This passage calls us to a rigorous self-examination, prompting us to identify any "foreign influences" or "unequal yokes" in our lives—be they relationships, habits, aspirations, or ideologies—that compromise our devotion to Christ or hinder our spiritual growth. True repentance often requires a willingness to make painful breaks with cherished things that stand between us and God's perfect will. It compels us to prioritize God's standards above personal comfort, social acceptance, or emotional attachments, recognizing that our ultimate allegiance must be to Him alone. The corporate nature of the sin and repentance in Ezra also reminds us of our accountability within the faith community and the importance of fostering an environment where purity and faithfulness are upheld, supporting one another in the often-difficult journey of obedience and sanctification.
Questions for Reflection
FAQ
Why was intermarriage considered such a serious sin in ancient Israel?
Intermarriage was considered a grave sin because it directly violated God's covenant commands, particularly as outlined in Deuteronomy 7:3-4. The primary concern was not racial purity, but spiritual purity and the preservation of Israel's unique identity as God's chosen people. Marrying outside the covenant community invariably led to the introduction of foreign gods and idolatrous practices, which corrupted Israel's worship of Yahweh and undermined their distinctiveness. This spiritual assimilation was seen as a direct threat to the nation's covenant relationship with God and was historically a major cause of their apostasy, ultimately leading to their exile. The drastic measures in Ezra reflect a deep understanding of this historical pattern and a desperate desire to prevent a recurrence of such spiritual compromise and divine judgment.
Was it truly necessary for the men to put away their wives and children? Wasn't this overly harsh?
From a modern perspective, this action appears incredibly harsh, causing immense personal suffering and social disruption. However, within the specific covenantal context of ancient Israel, it was deemed a necessary, albeit painful, act of corporate repentance and purification. The Mosaic Law explicitly prohibited such unions due to their profound spiritual danger and the historical precedent of idolatry stemming from them. The people and Ezra understood that the very survival of their distinct identity as God's people and the integrity of their covenant with Yahweh were at stake. This was not merely a social or personal issue but a profound theological crisis that threatened the nation's future. The severity of the remedy underscored the gravity of the sin and the absolute necessity of restoring covenant fidelity to prevent further divine judgment and ensure the nation's spiritual future. It was a radical surgical procedure, painful but deemed essential to save the life of the community and preserve its unique relationship with God.
Christ-Centered Fulfillment
The radical act of separation and purification in Ezra 10, exemplified by the listing of individuals like those in Ezra 10:21, foreshadows the ultimate and perfect purification accomplished through Jesus Christ. While Ezra's reforms involved external separation and a painful breaking of human ties to restore covenant purity, Christ establishes a new covenant that achieves an internal, spiritual cleansing. The Old Testament law, through its demands for purity and separation, continually pointed to humanity's inability to perfectly fulfill God's righteous standards and the need for a deeper, more profound redemption. Jesus, as the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world, offers Himself as the ultimate sacrifice, cleansing us not through the putting away of human relationships, but through the washing away of sin by His blood (Hebrews 9:22). In Him, believers are made new creations (2 Corinthians 5:17), set apart not by ethnic or social distinctions, but by the indwelling Holy Spirit, becoming a holy temple for God (1 Corinthians 6:19-20). The painful separation in Ezra highlights the cost of sin and the necessity of purity, ultimately directing our gaze to Christ, who perfectly fulfills the law's demands, provides the means for true, lasting purity, and brings us into an eternal, unbreakable covenant relationship with God (Hebrews 8:6-13).