Ezra 10:20

Translation
King James Version
And of the sons of Immer; Hanani, and Zebadiah.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
And of the sons H1121 of Immer H564; Hanani H2607, and Zebadiah H2069.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
Of the sons of Immer: Hanani and Z'vadyah;
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
From the descendants of Immer: Hanani and Zebadiah.
Ask
American Standard Version
And of the sons of Immer: Hanani and Zebadiah.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
Of the sons of Immer: Hanani and Zebadiah.
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
And of the sonnes of Immer, Honani, and Zebadiah.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
And of the sons of Immer: Hanani and Zebadiah;
Ask
See also
Ezra 2:371 Chronicles 24:14Nehemiah 7:40
See on the biblical-era map
Ezra’s Mission to Jerusalem
Ezra’s Mission to Jerusalem View full PDF

Map © Biblica Open Bible Maps · CC BY-SA 4.0

In the KJVVerse 12,273 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

Ezra 10:20 serves as a succinct but profoundly significant entry within the exhaustive roster of individuals in post-exilic Israel who had transgressed God's covenant by marrying foreign wives. Specifically identifying Hanani and Zebadiah from the prominent priestly family of Immer, this verse underscores the pervasive nature of this spiritual compromise, reaching even into the sacred ranks of the priesthood. It highlights the meticulous, painful, yet divinely mandated process undertaken to restore the community's spiritual integrity and unwavering faithfulness to their covenant relationship with Yahweh.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: Ezra 10:20 is situated within the climactic section of the book of Ezra, specifically within the detailed register of men who had taken foreign wives, which spans from Ezra 10:18 to 10:44. This comprehensive list represents the tangible outcome of the national repentance ignited by Ezra's profound intercession and lament in Ezra 9. Following Ezra's public display of grief, the people, under the leadership of Shecaniah, confessed their collective sin and solemnly resolved to enter into a covenant to separate from their foreign wives and children, acknowledging the severity of their disobedience (Ezra 10:1-5). Subsequently, a general assembly was convened in Jerusalem, and a special committee was appointed to meticulously investigate each case of intermarriage (Ezra 10:6-17). Verse 20, by naming specific individuals from the "sons of Immer," is part of the official, painful record of those who were found culpable and subsequently complied with the necessary act of separation, thereby demonstrating the thoroughness and solemnity of this profound spiritual reform. The prominent placement of priestly families at the beginning of this list (Ezra 10:18-22) emphatically highlights the gravity of the sin, as even those entrusted with spiritual leadership had compromised the purity of the covenant community.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: The events described in Ezra 10 unfold in the post-exilic period, approximately 458 BC, following the return of a remnant of the Jewish community from seventy years of Babylonian captivity. This return was a miraculous act of divine restoration, intended to re-establish Israel as God's holy nation in the Promised Land. A foundational aspect of their identity and covenant relationship with Yahweh was their strict separation from the idolatrous and pagan practices of the surrounding nations. The Mosaic Law explicitly forbade intermarriage with non-Israelites, not based on racial prejudice, but to prevent spiritual apostasy and the corruption of Israel's unique monotheistic faith (Deuteronomy 7:3-4). The widespread intermarriage revealed in Ezra's time indicated a profound failure to learn from the very sins of idolatry and syncretism that had directly led to the Babylonian exile. The "sons of Immer" represented a distinguished priestly family, whose lineage traced back to the divisions established by King David for temple service (1-chronicles/24-14). Their involvement in this widespread sin tragically underscores the depth of spiritual compromise within the community, demonstrating that no segment of society, not even the religious elite, was immune to the pervasive threat of assimilation.
  • Key Themes: Ezra 10:20 significantly contributes to several overarching theological and narrative themes central to the book of Ezra and the broader post-exilic historical narrative. Firstly, it powerfully exemplifies the theme of the Purity of the Covenant Community. The radical measures undertaken to address the issue of intermarriage were not driven by ethnic animosity but by a divine imperative to preserve the spiritual distinctiveness of Israel as God's chosen people, safeguarding them from the insidious influences of idolatry and cultural assimilation. This commitment to purity was essential for their role as a holy nation. Secondly, the verse highlights the severe Consequences of Disobedience and the absolute necessity of Radical Repentance. The meticulous listing of names, including Hanani and Zebadiah, serves as a public and painful record of sin and the tangible, costly steps required for both national and individual restoration. This act of "putting away" was a severe but indispensable demonstration of a renewed commitment to uphold God's law and restore the integrity of the community, reflecting the profound depth of their desire to be rightly related to God (Ezra 10:3). Thirdly, Ezra 10:20 underscores the crucial importance of Accountability and Leadership Integrity. The fact that even members of a prominent priestly family like Immer were implicated emphasizes that spiritual leaders are not exempt from God's holy standards and that communal accountability is absolutely vital for genuine spiritual health and faithfulness.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • Immer (Hebrew, ʾImmêr', H564): From the root meaning "talkative," this name identifies a specific priestly family or division. The family of Immer was a prominent priestly course established during King David's reign (1-chronicles/24-14) and is listed among those who returned from Babylonian exile (Ezra 2:37). The inclusion of individuals from this esteemed lineage is highly significant because priests were divinely appointed to uphold the highest standards of holiness and strict adherence to the Law, serving as the primary spiritual examples and instructors to the people. Their compromise through intermarriage highlights the pervasive nature of the sin, reaching even into the most sacred echelons of Israelite society.
  • Hanani (Hebrew, Ḥănânîy', H2607): Derived from the verb "to be gracious," this name means "gracious" or "Yahweh has favored." While the name itself carries a positive theological connotation of divine favor and grace, its bearer in this context is listed among those who had committed a serious sin against God's covenant. This creates a poignant and powerful contrast between the inherent meaning of the name—a declaration of God's benevolent character—and the reality of the individual's actions, underscoring the profound personal responsibility even for those whose names speak of divine blessing.
  • Zebadiah (Hebrew, Zᵉbadyâh', H2069): From the roots meaning "to bestow" and "Yahweh," this name signifies "Yahweh has given" or "Yahweh is my gift." Like Hanani, this name reflects a profound theological statement about God's provision or generosity. Its presence in this list similarly highlights the stark irony of individuals, whose very names declare divine blessing and gifting, engaging in actions that directly provoked divine displeasure and violated the sacred covenant. Both Hanani and Zebadiah were common names, and their inclusion here makes the account deeply personal and concretely illustrates the individual accountability within the corporate sin and subsequent repentance.

Verse Breakdown

  • "And of the sons of Immer;": This initial clause precisely identifies the specific lineage or family group to which the individuals belonged. The "sons of Immer" were a well-established and highly respected priestly family, a detail that profoundly emphasizes that the sin of intermarriage was not merely confined to the general populace but had alarmingly infiltrated even the priestly class, who bore the sacred responsibility of teaching and upholding God's law. This specific detail underscores both the gravity and the widespread nature of the spiritual compromise that had afflicted the returned community.
  • "Hanani, and Zebadiah.": This concluding clause explicitly names the two specific individuals from the Immer family who were found to have married foreign wives. Their explicit mention, along with the numerous other names in the broader list (Ezra 10:18-44), serves as a public and indelible record of their sin and, crucially, their subsequent participation in the national act of repentance and painful separation. The inclusion of these specific names makes the account deeply personal, highlighting the individual accountability that was demanded and demonstrated within the context of the corporate sin and the subsequent, difficult process of national repentance.

Literary Devices

Ezra 10:20, as an integral part of a larger, comprehensive list, primarily employs Catalogue or Enumeration as its foremost literary device. This meticulous and exhaustive listing of names serves to powerfully underscore the thoroughness of the investigation into covenant violations and the profound gravity of the sin of intermarriage. It moves beyond a generalized statement, presenting instead a precise, verifiable record of specific individuals who had directly violated the sacred covenant. The very act of naming, especially those from prominent and respected families like the Immerites, emphasizes the pervasive nature of the problem and the comprehensive scope of the painful solution. Furthermore, the names themselves, Hanani ("gracious") and Zebadiah ("Yahweh has bestowed"), introduce a subtle yet poignant Irony. While these names inherently reflect positive theological affirmations about God's character and His generous gifts, the individuals bearing them are found in a state of profound disobedience, highlighting the stark contrast between divine favor and human failure. This serves as a quiet yet powerful commentary on the persistent human tendency to stray from God's path, even when abundantly blessed by Him.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

Ezra 10:20, though remarkably brief, powerfully encapsulates the critical theological principle of covenant fidelity and the absolute necessity of holiness for God's people. The divine prohibition against intermarriage was never a matter of racial prejudice but a sacred command meticulously designed to preserve Israel's spiritual purity and prevent the insidious creep of syncretism, thereby ensuring they remained a distinct people wholly devoted to Yahweh. Their failure to uphold this command directly threatened their unique identity as the covenant nation and gravely jeopardized their divine mission to be a light to the Gentiles. The drastic measures undertaken, including the profoundly painful separation from foreign wives and children, underscore that genuine repentance often demands costly and tangible actions to align one's life, both individually and corporately, with God's revealed will. This unwavering commitment to purity reflects a deep and abiding understanding that God's people must be set apart for His holy purposes, actively avoiding defilement from the surrounding world and its corrupting influences.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

The specific command regarding intermarriage in Ezra's historical context was uniquely tied to ancient Israel's Mosaic covenant with God, meticulously designed to preserve their distinct national and spiritual identity and prevent devastating spiritual apostasy. However, the profound underlying principles illuminated by Ezra 10:20 remain powerfully relevant for believers in every age. This verse issues a compelling call to a radical commitment to spiritual purity and an uncompromising loyalty to God in a world that relentlessly pressures us to conform to its values. Just as ancient Israel was divinely called to be distinct, the Church today is called to be set apart, vigilantly guarding against influences that could compromise our faith, dilute our witness, and draw us away from our devotion to Christ. True repentance is far more than mere sorrow for sin; it necessitates concrete, often painful, steps to decisively turn away from ungodly practices and align our lives fully with God's perfect will. This might manifest as severing unholy alliances, renouncing harmful habits, or making difficult choices that unequivocally prioritize God's kingdom and His righteousness over personal comfort, worldly acceptance, or fleeting desires. The public nature of both the sin and the subsequent repentance in Ezra's narrative also serves as a potent reminder of the vital importance of corporate accountability within the body of Christ, where we are called to lovingly support one another in pursuing holiness and courageously addressing sin for the spiritual health and flourishing of the entire community.

Questions for Reflection

  • In what specific areas of my life might I be subtly compromising my spiritual purity or distinctness as a devoted follower of Christ?
  • What "foreign wives" – that is, unholy alliances, harmful habits, or worldly influences – might God be calling me to decisively "put away" in order to fully align with His perfect will?
  • Am I truly willing to take costly and potentially painful steps of repentance when confronted with sin, trusting implicitly that God's way, though difficult, ultimately leads to profound and lasting restoration?
  • How can I actively contribute to fostering a vibrant culture of accountability, spiritual integrity, and genuine holiness within my own faith community?

FAQ

Was the command against intermarriage in Ezra about racism or ethnic purity?

Answer: The biblical prohibition against intermarriage, as powerfully illustrated in Ezra and other Old Testament books, was fundamentally theological and spiritual in its intent, not racial or ethnocentric. God's paramount concern was the meticulous preservation of Israel's unique and sacred covenant relationship with Him and the prevention of idolatry, which was an ever-present threat. Marrying into pagan nations inevitably led to the adoption of their gods, their corrupt customs, and their immoral practices, thereby profoundly corrupting Israel's distinctive monotheistic faith and undermining their divinely appointed role as God's chosen people. The ultimate goal was to meticulously maintain the purity of their worship and their distinct identity as the people exclusively devoted to Yahweh, not to promote racial segregation. This spiritual rationale is explicitly articulated in passages like Deuteronomy 7:3-4, which unequivocally states the reason for the prohibition: "for they will turn your sons away from following Me to serve other gods."

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

The radical and profoundly painful measures undertaken in Ezra 10, including the forced separation from foreign wives, vividly highlight humanity's deep-seated need for purity and underscore the severe consequences of sin that compromises God's sacred covenant. While this Old Testament command was specific to Israel's national identity and the Mosaic covenant, it ultimately serves as a powerful pointer to the ultimate fulfillment found exclusively in Jesus Christ. The external, legalistic separation enforced in Ezra's time foreshadows the far more profound internal, spiritual transformation offered through Christ. No longer are God's people defined by ethnic lineage or outward adherence to a national law, but by a living faith in Jesus, who perfectly cleanses us from all sin and seamlessly incorporates us into a glorious new covenant community—the Church. Through His unparalleled atoning sacrifice, Jesus became the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world, thereby perfectly fulfilling the need for a spotless sacrifice that the Old Testament sacrificial system could only imperfectly foreshadow. He calls His followers to a spiritual separation from the world's corrupt systems and values, not through physical divorce, but through a radical renewal of the mind and a profound transformation of the heart (Romans 12:2). As the Church, we are called to be the spotless bride of Christ, set apart by His immeasurable grace and empowered by His Holy Spirit to live lives of unwavering holiness and devoted obedience, thereby reflecting the true purity that Ezra's reforms could only imperfectly achieve. Our spiritual union with Christ, rather than our physical separation from certain people, is the ultimate and eternal source of our distinct identity and our unshakeable spiritual integrity (2-corinthians/5-17).

Copy as

Commentary on Ezra 10 verses 15–44

The method of proceeding in this matter being concluded on, and the congregation dismissed, that each in his respective place might gain and give intelligence to facilitate the matter, we are here told, 1. Who were the persons that undertook to manage the matter and bring the causes regularly before the commissioners - Jonathan and Jahaziah, two active men, whether of the priests or of the people does not appear; probably they were the men that made that proposal (Ezr 10:13, Ezr 10:14) and were therefore the fittest to see it pursued; two honest Levites were joined with them, and helped them, Ezr 10:15. Dr. Lightfoot gives a contrary sense of this: only (or nevertheless) Jonathan and Jahaziah stood against this matter (which reading the original will very well bear), and these two Levites helped them in opposing it, either the thing itself or this method of proceeding. It was strange if a work of this kind was carried on and met with no opposition. 2. Who were the commissioners that sat upon this matter. Ezra was president, and with him certain chief men of the fathers who were qualified with wisdom and zeal above others for this service, Ezr 10:16. It was happy for them that they had such a man as Ezra to head them; they could not have done it well without his direction, yet he would not do it without their concurrence. 3. How long they were about it. They began the first day of the tenth month to examine the matter (Ezr 10:16), which was but ten days after this method was proposed (Ezr 10:9), and they finished in three months, Ezr 10:17. They sat closely and minded their business, otherwise they could not have despatched so many causes as they had before them in so little time; for we may suppose that all who were impeached were fairly asked what cause they could show why they should not be parted, and, if we may judge by other cases, provided the wife were proselyted to the Jewish religion she was not to be put away, the trial of which would require great care. 4. Who the persons were that were found guilty of this crime. Their names are here recorded to their perpetual reproach; many of the priests, nay, of the family of Jeshua, the high priest, were found guilty (Ezr 10:18), though the law had particularly provided, for the preserving of their honour in their marriages, that being holy themselves they should not marry such as were profane, Lev 21:7. Those that should have taught others the law broke it themselves and by their example emboldened others to do likewise. But, having lost their innocency in this matter, they did well to recant and give an example of repentance; for they promised under their hand to put away their strange wives (some think that they made oath to do so with their hands lifted up), and they took the appointed way of obtaining pardon, bringing the ram which was appointed by the law for a trespass offering (Lev 6:6), so owning their guilt and the desert of it, and humbly suing for forgiveness. About 113 in all are here named who had married strange wives, and some of them, it is said (Ezr 10:44), had children by them, which implies that not many of them had, God not crowning those marriages with the blessing of increase. Whether the children were turned off with the mothers, as Shechaniah proposed, does not appear; it should seem not: however it is probable that the wives which were put away were well provided for, according to their rank. One would think this grievance was now thoroughly redressed, yet we meet with it again (Neh 13:23 and Mal 2:11), for such corruptions are easily and insensibly brought in, but not without great difficulty purged out again. The best reformers can but do their endeavour, but, when the Redeemer himself shall come to Sion, he shall effectually turn away ungodliness from Jacob.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 15–44. Public domain.
Copy as
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Ezra 10:20 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

Read & Compare

Commentaries

Original Language & Research

Sermons, Hymns & Audio

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.