TRV
See on the biblical-era map
Study This Verse
Public-domain commentary
Matthew Henry
From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry comments on passages, not single verses — this entry covers Ezra 10:15–44.
The method of proceeding in this matter being concluded on, and the congregation dismissed, that each in his respective place might gain and give intelligence to facilitate the matter, we are here told, 1. Who were the persons that undertook to manage the matter and bring the causes regularly before the commissioners - Jonathan and Jahaziah, two active men, whether of the priests or of the people does not appear; probably they were the men that made that proposal (Ezr 10:13, Ezr 10:14) and were therefore the fittest to see it pursued; two honest Levites were joined with them, and helped them, Ezr 10:15. Dr. Lightfoot gives a contrary sense of this: only (or nevertheless) Jonathan and Jahaziah stood against this matter (which reading the original will very well bear), and these two Levites helped them in opposing it, either the thing itself or this method of proceeding. It was strange if a work of this kind was carried on and met with no opposition. 2. Who were the commissioners that sat upon this matter. Ezra was president, and with him certain chief men of the fathers who were qualified with wisdom and zeal above others for this service, Ezr 10:16. It was happy for them that they had such a man as Ezra to head them; they could not have done it well without his direction, yet he would not do it without their concurrence. 3. How long they were about it. They began the first day of the tenth month to examine the matter (Ezr 10:16), which was but ten days after this method was proposed (Ezr 10:9), and they finished in three months, Ezr 10:17. They sat closely and minded their business, otherwise they could not have despatched so many causes as they had before them in so little time; for we may suppose that all who were impeached were fairly asked what cause they could show why they should not be parted, and, if we may judge by other cases, provided the wife were proselyted to the Jewish religion she was not to be put away, the trial of which would require great care. 4. Who the persons were that were found guilty of this crime. Their names are here recorded to their perpetual reproach; many of the priests, nay, of the family of Jeshua, the high priest, were found guilty (Ezr 10:18), though the law had particularly provided, for the preserving of their honour in their marriages, that being holy themselves they should not marry such as were profane, Lev 21:7. Those that should have taught others the law broke it themselves and by their example emboldened others to do likewise. But, having lost their innocency in this matter, they did well to recant and give an example of repentance; for they promised under their hand to put away their strange wives (some think that they made oath to do so with their hands lifted up), and they took the appointed way of obtaining pardon, bringing the ram which was appointed by the law for a trespass offering (Lev 6:6), so owning their guilt and the desert of it, and humbly suing for forgiveness. About 113 in all are here named who had married strange wives, and some of them, it is said (Ezr 10:44), had children by them, which implies that not many of them had, God not crowning those marriages with the blessing of increase. Whether the children were turned off with the mothers, as Shechaniah proposed, does not appear; it should seem not: however it is probable that the wives which were put away were well provided for, according to their rank. One would think this grievance was now thoroughly redressed, yet we meet with it again (Neh 13:23 and Mal 2:11), for such corruptions are easily and insensibly brought in, but not without great difficulty purged out again. The best reformers can but do their endeavour, but, when the Redeemer himself shall come to Sion, he shall effectually turn away ungodliness from Jacob.
Continue studying Ezra 10:23 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
SefariaThe Hebrew text with Rashi and centuries of Jewish commentary.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
Summary
Ezra 10:23 is a concise but significant entry within a comprehensive list in Ezra chapter 10, detailing the names of Jewish men, specifically six Levites, who had taken foreign wives in violation of God's law. This verse, therefore, serves as a specific record of individuals from the priestly tribe who were implicated in the widespread sin of intermarriage and subsequently committed to the painful but necessary act of putting away their foreign spouses as part of a national covenant renewal and spiritual reformation.
Context
Literary Context
Ezra 10:23 is situated within the latter half of the book of Ezra, which chronicles the return of the Jewish exiles from Babylonian captivity and their efforts to re-establish their community in Jerusalem. Chapters 9 and 10 pivot from the rebuilding of the temple and the restoration of worship to a profound spiritual crisis: the pervasive intermarriage between the returned exiles and the pagan peoples of the land. This practice directly violated the Mosaic Law, particularly the prohibitions found in Deuteronomy 7:3-4, which were designed to preserve Israel's covenant purity and prevent apostasy. Ezra's deep distress over this sin, detailed in Ezra 9:3-5, leads to a national assembly and a solemn agreement to address the issue (Ezra 10:1-5). The subsequent list in Ezra 10:18-44 meticulously records the names of those who complied with the difficult decree to separate from their foreign wives, with verse 23 specifically identifying members of the Levite tribe.
Historical & Cultural Context
The post-exilic period was a critical juncture for the Jewish people. Having suffered the Babylonian exile as a consequence of their idolatry and disobedience, the returned remnant was acutely aware of the need to maintain their distinct identity and covenant fidelity. Intermarriage with the surrounding pagan nations posed an existential threat to this identity, risking assimilation and a return to the very idolatry that led to their previous downfall. The Levites, as assistants to the priests and guardians of the Law, held a position of spiritual leadership and responsibility within the community. Their involvement in the sin of intermarriage underscored the depth and pervasiveness of the spiritual compromise that had infiltrated even the most devout segments of society. The drastic measure of putting away wives and children, while seemingly harsh by modern standards, was understood within the Old Covenant framework as a necessary act of corporate repentance and purification to preserve the spiritual integrity and future of the covenant community.
Key Themes
The verse, within its broader context, powerfully reinforces several key themes central to Ezra's narrative and the post-exilic experience. First, the Purity and Holiness of the Covenant Community is paramount. The prohibition against intermarriage was not merely ethnic but theological, aimed at preventing spiritual defilement and idolatry (Exodus 34:15-16). Second, the theme of Obedience and Accountability is highlighted, particularly by the inclusion of Levites. Their spiritual office did not exempt them from the requirements of the Law; rather, it underscored the universal call to obedience and the necessity for leaders to model repentance. This demonstrates that sin affects all levels of society and requires a comprehensive response. Finally, the narrative emphasizes Repentance and Reformation. The listing of names signifies a painful but tangible commitment to national repentance, moving beyond mere confession to concrete, sacrificial action. This corporate act of obedience was crucial for restoring the community to a right standing with God and ensuring their spiritual survival and distinctiveness in the land (Nehemiah 9:2).
Exposition and Analysis
Key Word Analysis
The specific mention "of the Levites" is highly significant. According to the Strong's data, a Levite is a "descendant of Levi." The Levites were the tribe set apart by God for service in the tabernacle and later the temple, assisting the priests in their duties, teaching the Law, and maintaining the purity of worship (Numbers 3:6-9). Their inclusion in this list of those who had sinned through intermarriage underscores the pervasive nature of the transgression, indicating that even those entrusted with the spiritual well-being of the nation had compromised God's commands. It highlights that no one, regardless of spiritual office or standing, was immune to the pervasive sin, thus emphasizing the depth of the national crisis and the universal need for repentance.
From the Strong's data, Kelaiah means "insignificance." The inclusion of this name, along with its parenthetical clarification, points to the meticulous record-keeping of the chronicler.
Directly following Kelaiah, the parenthetical note "(the same [is] Kelita)" provides a unique insight into ancient naming conventions. According to the Strong's data, Kelita means "maiming." This suggests that Kelaiah was also known by the name Kelita, which could be a variant, a nickname, or a second name. The inclusion of this parenthetical note ensures clarity for the record, confirming the identity of the individual despite the dual naming, and perhaps subtly hinting at the personal cost or "maiming" involved in the necessary act of repentance.
Verse Breakdown
"Also of the Levites"
This opening phrase immediately draws attention to the specific group being identified. By beginning with "Also," it links these Levites to the previously mentioned groups (priests, sons of Jeshua, etc.), indicating that the sin of intermarriage was not confined to a single segment of society but had permeated even the spiritual leadership. The mention of "Levites" is particularly poignant, as their role was to uphold the Law and guide the people in righteousness, making their transgression a more serious breach of covenant fidelity.
"Jozabad, and Shimei, and Kelaiah, (the same [is] Kelita,) Pethahiah, Judah, and Eliezer"
This segment lists six specific individuals by name. The act of naming each person publicly serves as a formal record of their involvement in the sin and their subsequent participation in the act of repentance. In ancient Near Eastern culture, being named in such a list carried significant weight, signifying accountability and public acknowledgment of one's actions. The inclusion of these names underscores the personal nature of the corporate sin and the individual commitment required for national restoration. The parenthetical note for Kelaiah/Kelita further emphasizes the meticulous record-keeping, ensuring the accuracy and verifiable nature of the list for future generations.
Literary Devices
Ezra 10:23 primarily employs the literary device of List/Register. The entire chapter, particularly verses 18-44, functions as a formal register, meticulously documenting the names of those who had taken foreign wives and agreed to put them away. This device serves to provide an authoritative and verifiable record of the community's compliance with the covenant renewal. It lends historical weight and authenticity to the narrative, demonstrating that the repentance was not merely a general sentiment but involved specific individuals taking concrete action. Furthermore, the verse utilizes a Parenthetical Note with "(the same [is] Kelita)," which is a clarifying interjection. This device ensures precision in identification, indicating that the chronicler was aware of alternative names for individuals and sought to avoid confusion. Finally, there is an Implicit Contrast at play. By explicitly naming Levites, there is an unspoken contrast between their sacred office and their participation in a sin that threatened the spiritual purity of the nation. This contrast highlights the pervasive nature of the sin and underscores the universal need for repentance, even among those expected to be exemplary in their adherence to God's Law.
Theological and Thematic Connections
Ezra 10:23, while a simple list of names, is deeply embedded in the theological narrative of covenant fidelity and the consequences of disobedience. It underscores God's unwavering commitment to the holiness of His people and their separation from the idolatrous practices of the surrounding nations. The painful act of putting away foreign wives was not an arbitrary command but a severe, yet necessary, measure to prevent the spiritual assimilation that had historically led Israel into idolatry and exile. This incident highlights that true repentance involves not only sorrow for sin but also concrete, often costly, actions to rectify the wrong and restore a right relationship with God. It serves as a stark reminder that compromise with the world can lead to spiritual corruption, even among those dedicated to God's service, necessitating radical obedience for the preservation of the covenant community.
Reflection and Application
Ezra 10:23, though set in a specific historical and cultural context, offers enduring principles for the contemporary believer. It powerfully illustrates the importance of purity and distinction in the life of God's people. Just as ancient Israel was called to be distinct to preserve their covenant identity, Christians are called to live a life set apart from the world's values and practices (Romans 12:2). This verse reminds us that sin, particularly spiritual compromise, can infiltrate even the most dedicated members of the community, including leaders, necessitating vigilant self-examination and decisive action. True repentance, as exemplified here, is not merely an emotional experience but a commitment to tangible change, even when such change is painful and costly. It challenges us to consider what "foreign wives" or "unequal yokes" might exist in our own lives—relationships, habits, or allegiances—that compromise our fidelity to Christ and hinder our spiritual growth. The call to holiness is a call to radical obedience, trusting that God's ways, however difficult, ultimately lead to restoration and flourishing.
Questions for Reflection
FAQ
Why was intermarriage with foreign women considered such a severe sin in Ezra's time, necessitating such drastic measures?
In Ezra's time, the prohibition against intermarriage was not primarily based on ethnicity but on theology and covenant preservation. God had commanded Israel not to intermarry with the surrounding nations (e.g., Deuteronomy 7:3-4), because these nations worshipped other gods. The concern was that foreign spouses would lead the Israelites into idolatry and spiritual apostasy, corrupting their unique identity as God's covenant people. This had happened repeatedly throughout Israel's history, leading to severe consequences, including the Babylonian exile from which they had just returned. For the returned remnant, maintaining their spiritual purity and distinctness was paramount to their very survival and their ability to fulfill their role as God's chosen nation. The drastic measures, though painful, were seen as essential for corporate repentance and to prevent a relapse into the very sins that had brought about their prior judgment.
Christ-Centered Fulfillment
Ezra 10:23, with its focus on the purification of the covenant community, foreshadows the ultimate and perfect purification accomplished through Jesus Christ. The Old Covenant's emphasis on external separation and ritual purity, exemplified by the painful putting away of foreign wives, highlighted humanity's inability to achieve true holiness through human effort alone and the deep need for a radical transformation. In Christ, this deep need is met. He is the true Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world, offering a definitive sacrifice that cleanses us from all unrighteousness, not merely from external defilement. Through His atoning work, believers are made new creations (2 Corinthians 5:17), spiritually separated from the dominion of sin and the world's corrupting influences. The church, as the new covenant community, is called to a spiritual purity that transcends ethnic or marital boundaries, rooted in our union with Christ. We are to be a people set apart, a holy nation, not by putting away spouses, but by putting off the old self and putting on Christ (Ephesians 4:22-24), living in obedience to the Spirit and anticipating the day when Christ will present His church to Himself "without spot or wrinkle or any such thing, but holy and blameless" (Ephesians 5:27). Thus, the painful reformation in Ezra points to the glorious, complete, and grace-filled transformation available only through faith in Jesus.