Skip to content

Daniel 1:8

“Daniel's Resolve”Daniel 1:8–16

King James Version
But Daniel purposed in his heart that he would not defile himself with the portion of the king's meat, nor with the wine which he drank: therefore he requested of the prince of the eunuchs that he might not defile himself.

Bible text: King James Version (1769 Blayney text) · Public domain

KJV (with Strong's)
But Daniel H1840 purposed H7760 in his heart H3820 that he would not defile H1351 himself with the portion H6598 of the king's H4428 meat H6598, nor with the wine H3196 which he drank H4960: therefore he requested H1245 of the prince H8269 of the eunuchs H5631 that he might not defile H1351 himself.

Bible text: King James Version with Strong's numbers · Public domain

Berean Standard Bible
But Daniel made up his mind that he would not defile himself with the king’s food or wine. So he asked the chief official for permission not to defile himself.

Bible text: Berean Standard Bible · Public domain

American Standard Version
But Daniel purposed in his heart that he would not defile himself with the king’s dainties, nor with the wine which he drank: therefore he requested of the prince of the eunuchs that he might not defile himself.

Bible text: American Standard Version (1901) · Public domain

World English Bible Messianic
But Daniel purposed in his heart that he would not defile himself with the king’s dainties, nor with the wine which he drank: therefore he requested of the prince of the eunuchs that he might not defile himself.

Bible text: World English Bible, Messianic edition · Public domain

Geneva Bible (1599)
But Daniel had determined in his heart, that hee woulde not defile him selfe with the portion of the Kings meate, nor with the wine which he dranke: therefore he required the chiefe of the Eunuches that he might not defile himselfe.

Bible text: Geneva Bible (1599) · Public domain

Young's Literal Translation
And Daniel purposeth in his heart that he will not pollute himself with the king's portion of food, and with the wine of his drinking, and he seeketh of the chief of the eunuchs that he may not pollute himself.

Bible text: Young's Literal Translation · Public domain

King James Version — Interlinear
17 Hebrew words
  1. וַיָּשֶׂםvai·Ya·semand he setH7760Conj-w ¦ V-Qal-ConsecImperf-3msVerb Qal Consecutive Imperfect 3rd Singular Masculineוַandיָּשֶׂםhe set
  2. דָּנִיֵּאלda·ni·yeLDanielH1840N-proper-mNoun Proper Masculine
  3. עַל'alonH5921PrepPreposition
  4. לִבּוֹli·Bohis heartH3820N-msc ¦ 3msNoun Singular Masculine Construct with suffixלִבּheartוֹhis
  5. אֲשֶׁר'a·SherthatH834RelParticle Relative
  6. לֹאlo'notH3808NegParticle Negative
  7. יִתְגָּאַלyit·ga·'Alhe defiled himselfH1351V-Hithpael-Imperf-3msVerb Hithpael Imperfect 3rd Singular Masculine
  8. בְּפַתְבַּגbe·fat·Bagwith [the] delicaci[es] ofH6598Prep-b ¦ N-mscNoun Singular Masculine Constructבְּwithפַתְבַּג[the] delicaci[es] of
  9. הַמֶּלֶךְha·Me·lekhthe kingH4428Art ¦ N-msNoun Singular Masculine Absoluteהַtheמֶּלֶךְking
  10. וּבְיֵיןu·ve·Yeinand with [the] wine ofH3196Conj-w ¦ Prep-b ¦ N-mscNoun Singular Masculine Constructוּandבְwithיֵין[the] wine of
  11. מִשְׁתָּיוmish·Tavhis drinkH4960N-msc ¦ 3msNoun Singular Masculine Construct with suffixמִשְׁתָּיdrinkוhis
  12. וַיְבַקֵּשׁvay·va·Keshand he requestedH1245Conj-w ¦ V-Piel-ConsecImperf-3msVerb Piel Consecutive Imperfect 3rd Singular Masculineוַandיְבַקֵּשׁhe requested
  13. מִשַּׂרmi·Sarfrom [the] chief ofH8269Prep-m ¦ N-mscNoun Singular Masculine Constructמִfromשַּׂר[the] chief of
  14. הַסָּרִיסִיםha·sa·ri·Simthe officialsH5631Art ¦ N-mpNoun Plural Masculine Absoluteהַtheסָּרִיסִיםofficials
  15. אֲשֶׁר'a·SherthatH834RelParticle Relative
  16. לֹאlo'notH3808NegParticle Negative
  17. יִתְגָּאָלyit·ga·'Alhe will defile himselfH1351V-Hithpael-Imperf-3msVerb Hithpael Imperfect 3rd Singular Masculine
English is a literal word-by-word gloss of the Hebrew, not the KJV's wording. Why?

This is the original text the KJV's translators worked from — each Hebrew word with its own literal English meaning in this verse, prepared by scholars at Tyndale House, Cambridge. The KJV translates whole sentences, not word by word, so its wording differs: one Hebrew word can become several English words, and the KJV may choose “the LORD” where the gloss reads “Yahweh”. Both are faithful — they answer different questions. For the KJV's own rendering, switch to the KJV text.

Words in [ ] are added by the English.

Translation
Details
See on the biblical-era map
In the KJVVerse 21,746 of 31,102 · 69.9%

Study this verse

Written with AI assistance. Always check it against Scripture.

This verse

Daniel settles it in his heart to keep himself from defilement by the king’s food and wine, and he asks the chief official to let him do so.

“But Daniel purposed in his heart”

The “But” sets Daniel’s choice against the king’s plan for the young men in verses 3–5. The decision was made inwardly first, with his will settled before anything was said.

“that he would not defile himself with the portion of the king’s meat,”

The pathbag was the choice food sent from the royal kitchen to the trainees, likely unclean under the law or dedicated to idols.

“nor with the wine which he drank:”

The wine came from the king’s own table, and Daniel refuses it together with the food.

“therefore he requested of the prince of the eunuchs”

His resolve leads to a request. He goes to the official responsible for him and asks his leave.

“that he might not defile himself.”

The purpose is stated again at the end, so the whole verse is framed by it.

Passage studyDaniel 1:8–16

Daniel’s Resolve in Babylon

8But Daniel purposed in his heart that he would not defile himself with the portion of the king’s meat, nor with the wine which he drank: therefore he requested of the prince of the eunuchs that he might not defile himself. 9Now God had brought Daniel into favour and tender love with the prince of the eunuchs. 10And the prince of the eunuchs said unto Daniel, I fear my lord the king, who hath appointed your meat and your drink: for why should he see your faces worse liking than the children which are of your sort? then shall ye make me endanger my head to the king. 11Then said Daniel to Melzar, whom the prince of the eunuchs had set over Daniel, Hananiah, Mishael, and Azariah, 12Prove thy servants, I beseech thee, ten days; and let them give us pulse to eat, and water to drink. 13Then let our countenances be looked upon before thee, and the countenance of the children that eat of the portion of the king’s meat: and as thou seest, deal with thy servants. 14So he consented to them in this matter, and proved them ten days. 15And at the end of ten days their countenances appeared fairer and fatter in flesh than all the children which did eat the portion of the king’s meat. 16Thus Melzar took away the portion of their meat, and the wine that they should drink; and gave them pulse.

Summary

Daniel is a young captive from Judah, chosen with others to be trained for the service of Nebuchadnezzar, king of Babylon, and fed from the king’s own table. He settles it in his heart “that he would not defile himself” with the king’s food and wine, and he asks the official in charge of him for another way. God has already given Daniel favour with that official, who is still afraid of the king. So Daniel proposes a ten-day test of pulse and water, and at the end of it he and his three friends look healthier than all the young men who ate the king’s food. From then on the steward gives them pulse. The passage joins a firm heart to a respectful request, and it shows a God who rules in the court of a foreign king and honours those who honour him.

Daniel purposed in his heart

Daniel, Hananiah, Mishael and Azariah are among the young men of Judah carried to Babylon after Nebuchadnezzar took Jerusalem and plundered the temple (Daniel 1:1–2), around 605 BC. They were chosen for their intelligence, their appearance and their promise, to be taught the language and learning of the Chaldeans for three years, with a daily portion of the king’s food and wine (Daniel 1:3–5). Training of this kind was how the empire drew the brightest young people of conquered nations into its own service and loosened their ties to their own people. The king’s table was part of the plan, because food from the king’s hand bound the captives to him and to his court.

Verse 8 opens with “But”, and Daniel’s resolve stands against all of that. “Purposed in his heart” is in Hebrew literally “set upon his heart” (yāśīm ʿal-libbō). The verb sûwm means to put or set, and lêb, the heart, takes in the will and the mind as well as the feelings. Daniel settles the matter within himself, as a firm decision of the whole person, before the pressure of the moment and before he says a word to anyone.

The verb gâʼal, “defile”, means to soil or stain, and here it is uncleanness before God. The words “defile himself” come twice in verse 8, once in his resolve and once in his request, so we hear plainly what drives everything he does. The food he refuses is the king’s pathbag, a word of Persian origin meaning a dainty or a portion of provision, the choice food sent out from the royal kitchen. With it goes “the wine which he drank”. The word for wine is yayin, and the word behind “drank”, mishteh, means drinking and can also mean a banquet or feast.

Daniel’s name, Dânîyêʼl, is formed from the word for a judge and the word for God, and Strong’s gives its meaning as “judge of God”. In this verse he makes a careful judgment of his own, by the law of his God.

Why would the king’s food defile him?

The verse records Daniel’s resolve and leaves his reasons unstated. Two reasons are likely, and they stand together. First, the king’s kitchen would have served animals that the law of Moses calls unclean, and meat from animals slaughtered without the care the law required (Leviticus 11, Deuteronomy 14). Second, in the royal courts of the nations, food and drink were commonly dedicated to the gods before they were served. To eat at the king’s table could then mean taking part in his idolatry, which broke the covenant Israel had with the LORD, who warned his people against covenants with the peoples of the land and their gods (Exodus 34:15).

Behind both lies the question of allegiance. Eating the king’s provision was a sign of belonging to his court and his system. By keeping himself apart at the table, Daniel keeps his identity as one of God’s covenant people in a land that was working to remake him as a Babylonian. Paul calls believers to present their bodies to God as a living sacrifice, holy and acceptable, and to be transformed by God, free of the world’s mould (Romans 12:1–2). Daniel answered that same call long before, in Babylon.

A firm resolve and a respectful request

Daniel “requested of the prince of the eunuchs”. The verb bâqash means to seek or to ask, and it shows his manner. He goes to the official responsible for the young men, named Ashpenaz earlier in the chapter, and asks his permission. Daniel’s purpose is fixed, and his request is courteous. He seeks a way to honour God that also respects the man set over him and avoids needless conflict.

People ask whether this was civil disobedience. Daniel’s way was open, respectful and patient: he asked, he took the official’s fear seriously, and he proposed a test that left the decision with the steward. When the apostles later had to choose between God’s command and a ruler’s, they said they must obey God rather than men (Acts 5:29), and Peter also teaches believers to submit to human authority for the Lord’s sake (1 Peter 2:13–17). Daniel holds both together here. Jesus sent his disciples out to be “wise as serpents, and harmless as doves” (Matthew 10:16), and Daniel’s request is a picture of that wisdom.

God brought Daniel into favour

Verse 9 tells us why Daniel’s request found a hearing: “Now God had brought Daniel into favour and tender love with the prince of the eunuchs.” The name used for God, ʼĕlôhîym, is plural in form, and when it names the true God it is a plural of majesty, usually with a singular verb, as here. The verb nâthan is the ordinary word “to give”, used very widely for put, set and make, and the Hebrew says that God gave Daniel favour. Daniel’s own courtesy and wisdom are real, and the verse places the source of the official’s goodwill in God.

Two words describe that goodwill. Cheçed, “favour”, is kindness or goodwill, the word that so often describes God’s own faithful love for his people. Racham, “tender love”, is compassion, and by extension the same word means the womb, so it carries the warmth of deep feeling. Together they say that the official had real kindness and affection for this young captive.

He is the sar of the çârîyç, the chief over the eunuchs. Sar names a head person or official of any rank, and çârîyç is a eunuch, a trusted officer of the court. Eunuchs often held positions of great trust and power in the royal courts of that day, partly because their condition kept them from founding a dynasty of their own. Their chief had charge of the king’s young trainees and their daily provision, so his goodwill mattered greatly to a captive who meant to ask for something the king had ordered otherwise.

God has done this for his servants before and since. He gave Joseph favour with the keeper of the prison in Egypt (Genesis 39:21), and Esther found favour with the king of Persia (Esther 2:17). Proverbs says that when a man’s ways please the LORD, he makes even his enemies to be at peace with him (Proverbs 16:7), and it speaks of finding favour in the sight of God and man (Proverbs 3:4). Verse 9 comes right after Daniel’s resolve, and it shows God at work in the heart of a pagan official in a foreign palace, on behalf of the young man who had set his heart to honour him.

Will God always give favour to the faithful?

God’s favour to Daniel shows his power to open a way for his servants, and Scripture also tells of faithful people who suffered persecution, imprisonment and death (Hebrews 11:36–38). Daniel’s own friends would one day be thrown into the furnace (Daniel 3), and God’s help came to them in the fire. God works all things for the good of those who love him. That good may come as favour now, as strength to endure for his glory, or as reward in eternity, and he decides which in his wisdom.

The prince of the eunuchs fears the king

The official’s goodwill is real, and so is his fear. “I fear my lord the king,” he says. Yârêʼ is the adjective “fearing”, said of someone who is afraid, and in a moral sense of one who is reverent. He fears his ʼâdôwn, his lord or master, a word for one who rules. The king “hath appointed” the young men’s food and drink, and the verb mânâh means to weigh out, allot or appoint. Their ration was the king’s own order.

His worry is what the king will see. “Worse liking” translates zâʻaph, which properly means to boil up, and figuratively to be fretful or sad. Here it describes faces that look worse, drawn and poorly. “The children which are of your sort” are the other young men in training, and the word behind “sort” means a circuit of time, an age, so he means youths of their own age. If the four look worse than those, he says, “then shall ye make me endanger my head to the king.” Chûwb means perhaps to tie, and so to owe or become liable, and rôʼsh is the head. His head would be forfeit, and his life would be at stake.

In a court where the king’s word was absolute, that fear was realistic, and it shows the cost of Daniel’s request to others as well as to himself. The official fears the king, while Daniel’s resolve rests on the fear of God. Proverbs warns of the fear of man (Proverbs 29:25), and a psalm answers it: “The LORD is on my side; I will not fear: what can man do unto me?” (Psalm 118:6). Daniel treats the official’s fear as genuine and looks for a way through it, and God uses even the official’s anxiety to bring about the test that follows.

A ten-day test of pulse and water

Daniel next speaks to Melzar, “whom the prince of the eunuchs had set over Daniel, Hananiah, Mishael, and Azariah”. Meltsâr is of Persian derivation and names a butler or other officer of the Babylonian court, so it is probably a title, such as steward or overseer, more than a personal name. “Had set” is the same verb, mânâh, that described the king appointing their food in verse 10. The steward had been appointed to this charge, and he answered for the four young men’s daily care.

The friends’ names carry Israel’s faith into Babylon. Hananiah means “Jah has favoured”, Mishael “who is what God is?”, and Azariah “Jah has helped”. Verse 11 names all four because Daniel speaks for them all, and they will share the test and its result. The verb behind “said”, ʼâmar, is the everyday word to say, tell or command, and the courage of the moment lies in what Daniel goes on to say.

He asks, “Prove thy servants, I beseech thee, ten days.” The verb nâçâh means to test or try. He calls the four “thy servants”, using ʻebed, the ordinary word for a servant or bondman, and with “I beseech thee” he speaks humbly to the steward. He asks for zêrôaʻ, “pulse”, which means something sown, a vegetable eaten as food, and for mayim, water, to drink (shâthâh). The verb ʼâkal, “to eat”, is the plain word for eating. Daniel asks for plain food from the field and plain water in place of the dainties and wine of the king.

Then he names the measure: “Then let our countenances be looked upon before thee.” Marʼeh, “countenance”, is a view or an appearance, the way a person looks, from the face to the whole bearing. The steward will compare them with the young men “that eat of the portion of the king’s meat”, and “as thou seest, deal with thy servants”. The verb for “deal” is the broad word to do or make. Daniel leaves the judgment in Melzar’s hands and trusts God with the outcome.

“So he consented to them in this matter.” The verb shâmaʻ means to hear with understanding, often with the sense of heeding, so the steward listened and agreed. Dâbâr, “matter”, means a word and also a matter or thing, here the proposal itself. “And proved them ten days” uses nâçâh, the same verb as Daniel’s “Prove” in verse 12, and the steward does just what Daniel asked.

Why ten days, and why a test?

Ten days (yôwm, day) were long enough for a change in their faces to show, and short enough to keep the steward’s risk small. Had the four looked poorly, the test could have ended before any harm reached him. The plan met the official’s fear on its own terms, since his whole worry was how the young men would look, and it let the steward see the answer with his own eyes. It honoured God, it protected the man over them, and it left room for God to show his hand.

The matter was small, a question of food and drink, and Jesus teaches that faithfulness in little things goes with faithfulness in much (Luke 16:10). Daniel’s quiet stand at the table prepares for greater tests later in the book.

Fairer and fatter in flesh

“And at the end of ten days their countenances appeared fairer and fatter in flesh than all the children which did eat the portion of the king’s meat.” Ṭôwb, “fairer”, is the broad word for good, and of a person’s looks it means healthy and pleasing to see. Bârîyʼ, “fatter”, means fatted or plump, well fed and firm, and bâsâr is flesh. In that day a full face and body were a sign of health and good living. The official’s fear in verse 10 is answered exactly, because the four look better than every young man at the king’s table.

The change came in only ten days, after the plain food that was expected to weaken them, and coming after verse 9 we rightly see in it God’s blessing on their faithfulness. His care reached their bodies as well as their standing at court, and the simple food from the field outdid the king’s table. God honours those who honour him (1 Samuel 2:30).

“Thus Melzar took away the portion of their meat, and the wine that they should drink; and gave them pulse.” Nâsâʼ means to lift or carry away. The steward removes the king’s food and wine from their allowance and gives them pulse, and the test becomes their way of life from then on. The verb “gave” is nâthan, the same verb used in verse 9 for God bringing Daniel into favour and in verse 12 for “let them give us pulse”. God gave the favour, and so the steward gave the food Daniel had asked for.

The chapter goes on to say that God gave the four knowledge and wisdom, and that the king found them ten times better than all his wise men (Daniel 1:17–20). Scripture speaks often of this faithfulness of God: “Trust in the LORD with all thine heart; and lean not unto thine own understanding. In all thy ways acknowledge him, and he shall direct thy paths” (Proverbs 3:5–6). “Trust in the LORD, and do good; so shalt thou dwell in the land, and verily thou shalt be fed. Delight thyself also in the LORD; and he shall give thee the desires of thine heart” (Psalm 37:3–4). “The steps of a good man are ordered by the LORD” (Psalm 37:23), and Jesus promises that those who seek first the kingdom of God and his righteousness will have all these things added to them (Matthew 6:33).

Does this passage command a vegetable diet?

The issue for Daniel was the king’s food itself, unclean or tied to idols, and the lesson of the passage is God’s blessing on the obedience of his servants. Pulse was the faithful choice in that place, and Daniel gives it to us as an example of faithfulness, with no rule about meat for every believer. Believers in Christ are free regarding food, so long as what they eat brings no spiritual harm and causes no one to stumble, and Paul tells the church to receive one another without judging each other over what they eat (Romans 14:1–4).

A small matter and the trials to come

What Daniel did over food prepares the way for everything that follows in Daniel 1 and in the book. The same wisdom shows when he interprets Nebuchadnezzar’s dream (Daniel 2), the same faithfulness when his friends refuse to bow to the king’s image and are thrown into the fiery furnace (Daniel 3), and the same steadfast heart when Daniel himself keeps praying and is cast into the lions’ den (Daniel 6). In each place God honours his servants and shows his power over the empires of men. The courage of those later chapters began at a table in Babylon, with a young man who had settled the matter in his heart.

Christ, the pure and faithful Servant

Daniel’s resolve points us to Jesus, who kept himself pure in every way. He was tempted in every way as we are, yet without sin (Hebrews 4:15). In the wilderness the devil tempted him to turn stones into bread and offered him the kingdoms of the world, and Jesus answered, “Man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word that proceedeth out of the mouth of God” (Matthew 4:1–11). He was obedient to his Father even to death on the cross (Philippians 2:8), and he is the Holy One of God (Mark 1:24).

Daniel kept himself from defilement, and Christ, who knew no sin, was made sin for us, so that we might become the righteousness of God in him (2 Corinthians 5:21). He loved the church and gave himself for it, to cleanse it and present it to himself without spot or wrinkle (Ephesians 5:25–27), and in him God chose us to be holy and blameless before him (Ephesians 1:4).

The favour God gave Daniel with a Babylonian official points to the favour that rests on the Son, in whom the Father is well pleased (Matthew 3:17). In him we are accepted in the beloved (Ephesians 1:6), we have access by faith into God’s grace (Romans 5:2), and we are made children of God (John 1:12). Daniel was sustained by pulse and water, and Jesus is the bread of life (John 6:35) who gives living water (John 4:10–14). The fear that gripped the chief official is answered in Christ, who delivers his people from the fear of death (Hebrews 2:14–15) and rescues us from the wrath to come (1 Thessalonians 1:10), for our life is hid with Christ in God (Colossians 3:3).

Faithful in a foreign court

This passage gives us a young man far from home who decided what he would do before the pressure came, and who carried out that decision with courtesy toward the people over him. It shows a God who is as present in Babylon as in Jerusalem, who gives kindness and tender love in the heart of a foreign official, and who honours those who honour him. The faithfulness asked of Daniel was in an ordinary matter of food and drink, and God was pleased to meet him there and to make his obedience plain to everyone who looked at his face. Daniel’s way of a settled heart and a gracious request is open to every believer whose faithfulness sets them at odds with the world around them, and the God who saw Daniel through is the same God today.

Last revised

Public-domain commentary

Matthew Henry

From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry wrote on whole passages, and this entry covers Daniel 1:8–16. He set out his notes in a two-level outline, kept here as he numbered it.

1662–1714 · 9 verses
Passage under commentDaniel 1:8–16
I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points

We observe here, very much to our satisfaction,

I.That Daniel was a favourite with the prince of the eunuchs (Daniel 1:9), as Joseph was with the keeper of the prison; he had a tender love for him. No doubt Daniel deserved it, and recommended himself by his ingenuity and sweetness of temper (he was greatly beloved, Daniel 9:23); and yet it is said here that it was God that brought him into favour with the prince of the eunuchs, for every one does not meet with acceptance according to his merits. Note, The interest which we think we make for ourselves we must acknowledge to be God's gift, and must ascribe to him the glory of it. Whoever are in favour, it is God that has brought them into favour; and it is by him that they find good understanding. Herein was again verified That work (Psalm 106:46), He made them to be pitied of all those that carried them captives. Let young ones know that the way to be acceptable is to be tractable and dutiful.

II.That Daniel was still firm to his religion.

They had changed his name, but they could not change his nature. Whatever they pleased to call him, he still retained the spirit of an Israelite indeed. He would apply his mind as closely as any of them to his books, and took pains to make himself master of the learning and tongue of the Chaldeans, but he was resolved that he would not defile himself with the portion of the king's meat, he would not meddle with it, nor with the wine which he drank, Daniel 1:8. And having communicated his purpose, with the reasons of it, to his fellows, they concurred in the same resolution, as appears, Daniel 1:11. This was not out of sullenness, or peevishness, or a spirit of contradiction, but from a principle of conscience. Perhaps it was not in itself unlawful for them to eat of the king's meat or to drink of his wine. But,

1.They were scrupulous concerning the meat, lest it should be sinful. Sometimes such meat would be set before them as was expressly forbidden by their law, as swine's flesh; or they were afraid lest it should have been offered in sacrifice to an idol, or blessed in the name of an idol. The Jews were distinguished from other nations very much by their meats (Leviticus 11:45, Leviticus 11:46), and these pious young men, being in a strange country, thought themselves obliged to keep up the honour of their being a peculiar people. Though they could not keep up their dignity as princes, they would not lose it as Israelites; for on that they most valued themselves. Note, When God's people are in Babylon they have need to take special care that they partake not in her sins. Providence seemed to lay this meat before them; being captives they must eat what they could get and must not disoblige their masters; yet, if the command be against it, they must abide by that. Though Providence says, Kill and eat, conscience says, Not so, Lord, for nothing common or unclean has come into my mouth.

2.They were jealous over themselves, lest, though it should not be sinful in itself, it should be an occasion of sin to them, lest, by indulging their appetites with these dainties, they should grow sinful, voluptuous, and in love with the pleasures of Babylon. They had learned David's prayer, Let me not eat of their dainties (Psalm 141:4), and Solomon's precept, Be not desirous of dainties, for they are deceitful meat (Proverbs 23:3), and accordingly they form their resolution. Note, It is very much the praise of all, and especially of young people, to be dead to the delights of sense, not to covet them, not to relish them, but to look upon them with indifference. Those that would excel in wisdom and piety must learn betimes to keep under the body and bring it into subjection.

3.However, they thought it unseasonable now, when Jerusalem was in distress, and they themselves were in captivity. They had no heart to drink wine in bowls, so much were they grieved for the affliction of Joseph. Though they had royal blood in their veins, yet they did not think it proper to have royal dainties in their mouths when they were thus brought low. Note, It becomes us to be humble under humbling providences. Call me not Naomi; call me Marah. See the benefit of affliction; by the account Jeremiah gives of the princes and great men now at Jerusalem it appears that they were very corrupt and wicked, and defiled themselves with things offered to idols, while these young gentlemen that were in captivity would not defile themselves, no, not with their portion of the king's meat. How much better is it with those that retain their integrity in the depths of affliction than with those that retain their iniquity in the heights of prosperity! Observe, The great thing that Daniel avoided was defiling himself with the pollutions of sin; that is the thing we should be more afraid of than of any outward trouble. Daniel, having taken up this resolution, requested of the prince of the eunuchs that he might not defile himself, not only that he might not be compelled to do it, but that he might not be tempted to do it, that the bait might not be laid before him, that he might not see the portion appointed him of the king's meat, nor look upon the wine when it was red. It will be easier to keep the temptation at a distance than to suffer it to come near and then be forced to put a knife to our throat. Note, We cannot better improve our interest in any with whom we have found favour than by making use of them to keep us from sin.

III.That God wonderfully owned him herein.

When Daniel requested that he might have none of the king's meat or wine set before him the prince of the eunuchs objected that, if he and his fellows were not found in as good case as any of their companions, he should be in danger of having anger and of losing his head, Daniel 1:10. Daniel, to satisfy him that there would be no danger of any bad consequence, desires the matter might be put to a trial. He applies himself further to the under-officer, Melzar, or the steward: "Prove us for ten days; during that time let us have nothing but pulse to eat, nothing but herbs and fruits, or parched peas or lentils, and nothing but water to drink, and see how we can live upon that, and proceed accordingly," Daniel 1:13. People will not believe the benefit of abstemiousness and a spare diet, nor how much it contributes to the health of the body, unless they try it. Trial was accordingly made. Daniel and his fellows lived for ten days upon pulse and water, hard fare for young men of genteel extraction and education, and which one would rather expect they should have indented against than petitioned for; but at the end of the ten days they were compared with the other children, and were found fairer and fatter in flesh, of a more healthful look and better complexion, than all those who did eat the portion of the king's meat, Daniel 1:15. This was in part a natural effect of their temperance, but it must be ascribed to the special blessing of God, which will make a little to go a great way, a dinner of herbs better than a stalled ox. By this it appears that man lives not by bread alone; pulse and water shall be the most nourishing food if God speak the word. See what it is to keep ourselves pure from the pollutions of sin; it is the way to have that comfort and satisfaction which will be health to the navel and marrow to the bones, while the pleasures of sin are rottenness to the bones.

IV.That his master countenanced him.

The steward did not force them to eat against their consciences, but, as they desired, gave them pulse and water (Daniel 1:16), the pleasures of which they enjoyed, and we have reason to think were not envied the enjoyment. Here is a great example of temperance and contentment with mean things; and (as Epicurus said) "he that lives according to nature will never be poor, but he that lives according to opinion will never be rich." This wonderful abstemiousness of these young men in the days of their youth contributed to the fitting of them,

1.For their eminent services. Hereby they kept their minds clear and unclouded, and fit for contemplation, and saved for the best employments a great deal both of time and thought; and thus they prevented those diseases which indispose men for the business of age that owe their rise to the intemperances of youth.

2.For their eminent sufferings. Those that had thus inured themselves to hardship, and lived a life of self-denial and mortification, could the more easily venture upon the fiery furnace and the den of lions, rather than sin against God.

Historical interpretation

Two Centuries of Reception

3 surviving comments on this verse. Each one is dated, so this reads as a timeline rather than a list.

3 quotes · AD 235–458
Ante-NicenePost-Nicene
300400

Select a marker to jump to its quote. Markers stagger vertically where authors wrote within a few decades of each other.

"And Daniel purposed in his heart." Oh, blessed are they who thus kept the covenant of the fathers, and transgressed not the law given by Moses, but feared the God proclaimed by him. These, though captives in a strange land, were not seduced by delicate meats, nor were they slaves to the pleasures of wine, nor were they caught by the bait of princely glory. But they kept their mouth holy and pure, that pure speech might proceed from pure mouths, and praise with such (mouths) the heavenly Father.
Verse 8. "Daniel, however, purposed in his heart that he would not be defiled by food from the king's table, nor by the wine which he drank, and he asked the chief of the eunuchs that he might not be polluted." He who would not eat or drink of the king's food or wine lest he be denied (especially if he should be aware that the wisdom and teaching of the Babylonians is mistaken), would never consent to utter what was wrong. On the contrary they speak it forth, not that they may follow it themselves, but in order to pass judgment upon it and refute it. Just as anyone would expose himself to ridicule if he being untrained in mathematics should desire to write in confutation of mathematicians, or, being ignorant of the teachings of philosophers should desire to write in opposition to philosophers. Hence they study the teaching of the Chaldeans with the same intention as Moses studied the wisdom of the Egyptians.
d. AD 458Theodoret of CyrusPost-NiceneSourceCOMMENTARY ON DANIEL 1:8
For those who love God do not seek after the God of all in just one place, but even in the midst of this misfortune they worshiped as if in the house of the Creator. In that place there are many wondrous moments to be found. For having been reared on the teachings of the Jews and having learned the customary service to God, they now were dwelling in a foreign land and were being forced into slavery exactly at the prime of their life. They were forced to abide under the foreign customs. But having seen the Babylonians offer defiled meat to the idols and the polluted libations at the temple, they took heed and, neglecting their own safety, rejected the king’s banquet, beseeching the chief eunuch to allow them to be excused from partaking of the king’s food.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.

Continue studying Daniel 1:8 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.

Related study articles8