TRV
See on the biblical-era map
Study This Verse
Commentary on 2 Samuel 3 verses 22–39
We have here an account of the murder of Abner by Joab, and David's deep resentment of it.
I. Joab very insolently fell foul upon David for treating with Abner. He happened to be abroad upon service when Abner was with David, pursuing a troop, either of Philistines or of Saul's party; but, upon his return, he was informed that Abner was just gone (Sa2 3:22, Sa2 3:23), and that a great many kind things had passed between David and him. He had all the reason in the world to be satisfied of David's prudence and to acquiesce in the measures he took, knowing him to be a wise and good man himself and under a divine conduct in all his affairs; and yet, as if he had the same sway in David's cause that Abner had in Ish-bosheth's, he chides David, and reproaches him to his face as impolitic (Sa2 3:24, Sa2 3:25): What hast thou done? As if David were accountable to him for what he did: "Why hast thou sent him away, when thou mightest have made him a prisoner? He came as a spy, and will certainly betray thee." I know not whether to wonder more that Joab had impudence enough to give such an affront to his prince or that David had patience enough to take it. He does, in effect, call David a fool when he tells him he knew Abner came to deceive him and yet he trusted him. We find no answer that David gave him, not because he feared him, as Ish-bosheth did Abner (Sa2 3:11), but because he despised him, or because Joab had not so much good manners as to stay for an answer.
II. He very treacherously sent for Abner back, and, under colour of a private conference with him, barbarously killed him with his own hand. That he made use of David's name, under pretence of giving him some further instructions, is intimated in that, but David knew it not, Sa2 3:26. Abner, designing no harm, feared none, but very innocently returned to Hebron, and, when he found Joab waiting for him at the gate, turned aside with him to speak with him privately, forgetting what he himself had said when he slew Asahel, How shall I hold up my face to Joab thy brother? (Sa2 2:22), and there Joab murdered him (Sa2 3:27), and it is intimated (Sa2 3:30) that Abishai was privy to the design, and was aiding and abetting, and would have come in to his brother's assistance if there had been occasion; he is therefore charged as an accessary: Joab and Abishai slew Abner, though perhaps he only knew it who is privy to the thoughts and intents of men's hearts. Now in this, 1. It is certain that the Lord was righteous. Abner had maliciously, and against the convictions of his conscience, opposed David. He had now basely deserted Ish-bosheth, and betrayed him, under pretence of regard to God and Israel, but really from a principle of pride, and revenge, and impatience of control. God will not therefore use so bad a man, though David might, in so good a work as the uniting of Israel. Judgments are prepared for such scorners as Abner was. But, 2. It is as certain that Joab was unrighteous, and, in what he did, did wickedly. David was a man after God's own heart, but could not have those about him, no, not in places of the greatest trust, after his own heart. Many a good prince, and a good master, has been forced to employ bad men. (1.) Even the pretence for doing this was very unjust. Abner had indeed slain his brother Asahel, and Joab and Abishai pretended herein to be the avengers of his blood (Sa2 3:27, Sa2 3:30); but Abner slew Asahel in an open war, wherein Abner indeed had given the challenge, but Joab himself had accepted it and had slain many of Abner's friends. He did it likewise in his own defence, and not till he had given him fair warning (which he would not take), and he did it with reluctancy; but Joab here shed the blood of war in peace, Kg1 2:5. (2.) That which we have reason to think was at the bottom of Joab's enmity to Abner made it much worse. Joab was now general of David's forces; but, if Abner should come into his interest, he would possibly be preferred before him, being a senior officer, and more experienced in the art of war. This Joab was jealous of, and could better bear the guilt of blood than the thoughts of a rival. (3.) He did it treacherously, and under pretence of speaking peaceably to him, Deu 27:24. Had he challenged him, he would have done like a soldier; but to assassinate him was done villainously and like a coward. His words were softer than oil, yet were they drawn swords, Psa 55:21. Thus he basely slew Amasa, Sa2 20:9, Sa2 20:10. (4.) The doing of it was a great affront and injury to David, who was now in treaty with Abner, as Joab knew. Abner was now actually in his master's service, so that, through his side, he struck at David himself. (5.) It was a great aggravation of the murder that he did it in the gate, openly and avowedly, as one that was not ashamed, nor could blush. The gate was the place of judgment and the place of concourse, to that he did it in defiance of justice, both the just sentence of the magistrates and the just resentment of the crowd, as one that neither feared God nor regarded men, but thought himself above all control: and Hebron was a Levites' city and a city of refuge.
III. David laid deeply to heart and in many ways expressed his detestation of this execrable villany.
1.He washed his hands from the guilt of Abner's blood. Lest any should suspect that Joab had some secret intimation from David to do as he did (and the rather because he went so long unpunished), he here solemnly appeals to God concerning his innocency: I and my kingdom are guiltless (and my kingdom is so because I am so) before the Lord for ever, Sa2 3:28. It is a comfort to be able to say, when any bad thing is done, that we had no hand in it. We have not shed this blood, Deu 21:7. However we may be censured or suspected, our hearts shall not reproach us.
2.He entailed the curse for it upon Joab and his family (Sa2 3:29): "Let it rest on the head of Joab. Let the blood cry against him, and let divine vengeance follow him. Let the iniquity be visited upon his children and children's children, in some hereditary disease or other. The longer the punishment is delayed, the longer let it last when it shall come. Let his posterity be stigmatized, blemished with an issue or a leprosy, which will shut them out from society; let them be beggars, or cripples, or come to some untimely end, that it may be said, He is one of Joab's race." This intimates that the guilt of blood brings a curse upon families; if men do not avenge it, God will, and will lay up the iniquity for the children. But methinks a resolute punishment of the murderer himself would better have become David than this passionate imprecation of God's judgments upon his posterity.
3.He called upon all about him, even Joab himself, to lament the death of Abner (Sa2 3:31): Rend your clothes and mourn before Abner, that is, before the hearse of Abner, as Abraham is said to mourn before his dead (Gen 23:2, Gen 23:3), and he gives a reason why they should attend his funeral with sincere and solemn mourning (Sa2 3:38), because there is a prince and a great man fallen this day in Israel. His alliance to Saul, his place as general, his interest, and the great services he had formerly done, were enough to denominate him a prince and a great man. When he could not call him a saint or a good man, he said nothing of that, but what was true he gave him the praise of, though he had been his enemy, that he was a prince and a great man. "Such a man has fallen in Israel, and fallen this day, just when he was doing the best deed he ever did in his life, this day, when he was likely to be so serviceable to the public peace and welfare and could so ill be spared." (1.) Let them all lament it. The humbling change death puts all men under is to be lamented, especially as affecting princes and great men. Alas! alas! (see Rev 18:10) how mean, how little, are those made by death who made themselves the terror of the mighty in the land of the living! But we are especially obliged to lament the fall of useful men in the midst of their usefulness and when there is most need of them. A public loss must be every man's grief, for every man shares in it. Thus David took care that honour should be done to the memory of a man of merit, to animate others. (2.) Let Joab, in a particular manner, lament it, which he has less heart but more reason to do than any of them. If he could be brought to do it sincerely, it would be an expression of repentance for his sin in slaying him. If he did it in show only, as it is likely he did, yet it was a sort of penance imposed upon him, and a present commutation of the punishment. If he do not as yet expiate the murder with his blood, let him do something towards it with tears. This, perhaps, Joab submitted to with no great reluctancy, now he had gained his point. Now that he is on the bier, no matter in what pomp he lies. Sit divus, modo non sit vivus - Let him be canonized, so that he be but killed.
4.David himself followed the corpse as chief mourner, and made a funeral oration at the grave. He attended the bier (Sa2 3:31) and wept at the grave, Sa2 3:32. Though Abner had been his enemy, and might possibly have proved no very firm friend, yet because he had been a man of bravery in the field, and might have done great service in the public counsels at this critical juncture, all former quarrels are forgotten and David is a true mourner for his fall. What he said over the grave fetched fresh floods of tears from the eyes of all that were present, when they thought they had already paid the debt in full (Sa2 3:33, Sa2 3:34): Died Abner as a fool dieth? (1.) He speaks as one vexed that Abner was fooled out of his life, that so great a man as he, so famed for conduct and courage, should be imposed upon by a colour of friendship, slain by surprise, and so die as a fool dies. The wisest and stoutest of men have no fence against treachery. To see Abner, who thought himself the main hinge on which the great affairs of Israel turned, so considerable as himself to be able to turn the scale of a trembling government, his head full of great projects and great prospects, to see him made a fool of by a base rival, and falling on a sudden a sacrifice to his ambition and jealousy - this stains the pride of all glory, and should put one out of conceit with worldly grandeur. Put not your trust in princes, Psa 146:3, Psa 146:4. And let us therefore make that sure which we cannot be fooled out of. A man may have his life, and all that is dear to him, taken from him, and not be able to prevent it with all his wisdom, care, and integrity; but there is that which no thief can break through to steal. See here how much more we are beholden to God's providence than to our own prudence for the continuance of our lives and comforts. Were it not for the hold God has of the consciences of bad men, how soon would the weak and innocent become an easy prey to the strong and merciless and the wisest die as fools! Or, (2.) He speaks as one boasting that Abner did not fool himself out of his life: "Died Abner as a fool dies? No, he did not, not as a criminal, a traitor or felon, that forfeits his life into the hands of public justice; his hands were not pinioned, nor his feet fettered, as those of malefactors are: Abner falls not before just men, by a judicial sentence; but as a man, an innocent man, falleth before wicked men, thieves and robbers, so fellest thou." Died Abner as Nabal died? so the Septuagint reads it. Nabal died as he lived, like himself, like a sot; but Abner's fate was such as might have been the fate of the wisest and best man in the world. Abner did not throw away his life as Asahel did, who wilfully ran upon the spear, after fair warning, but he was struck by surprise. Note, It is a sad thing to die like a fool, as those do that in any way shorten their own days, and much more those that make no provision for another world.
5.He fasted all that day, and would by no means be persuaded to eat any thing till night, Sa2 3:35. It was then the custom of great mourners to refrain for the time from bodily refreshments, as Sa2 1:12; Sa1 31:13. How incongruous is it then to turn the house of mourning into a house of feasting! This respect which David paid to Abner was very pleasing to the people and satisfied them that he was not, in the least, accessory to the murder (Sa2 3:36, Sa2 3:37), of which he was solicitous to avoid the suspicion, lest Joab's villany should make him odious, as that of Simeon and Levi did Jacob, Gen 34:30. On this occasion it is said, Whatever the king did pleased all the people. This intimates, (1.) His good affection to them. He studied to please them in every thing and carefully avoided what might be disobliging. (2.) Their good opinion of him. They thought every thing he did well done. Such a mutual willingness to please, and easiness to be pleased, will make every relation comfortable.
6.He bewailed it that he could not with safety do justice on the murderers, Sa2 3:30. He was weak, his kingdom was newly planted, and a little shake would overthrow it. Joab's family had a great interest, were bold and daring, and to make them his enemies now might be of bad consequence. These sons of Zeruiah were too hard for him, too big for the law to take hold of; and therefore, though by man, by the magistrate, the blood of a murderer should be shed (Gen 9:6), David bears the sword in vain, and contents himself, as a private person, to leave them to the judgment of God: The Lord shall reward the doer of evil according to his wickedness. Now this is a diminution, (1.) To David's greatness. He is anointed king, and yet is kept in awe by his own subjects, and some of them are too hard for him. Who would be fond of power when a man may have the name of it, and must be accountable for it, and yet be hampered in the use of it? (2.) To David's goodness. He ought to have done his duty, and trusted God with the issue. Fiat justitia, ruat coelum - Let justice be done, though the heavens should fall asunder. If the law had had its course against Joab, perhaps the murder of Ishbosheth, Amnon, and others, would have been prevented. It was carnal policy and cruel pity that spared Joab. Righteousness supports the throne and will never shake it. Yet it was only a reprieve that David gave to Joab; on his death-bed he left it to Solomon (who could the better wield the sword of justice because he had no occasion to draw the sword of war) to avenge the blood of Abner. Evil pursues sinners, and will overtake them at last. David preferred Abner's son Jaasiel, Ch1 27:21.
Continue studying 2 Samuel 3:27 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
SefariaThe Hebrew text with Rashi and centuries of Jewish commentary.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
SUMMARY
Second Samuel 3:27 meticulously details the treacherous assassination of Abner by Joab at the city gate of Hebron. This pivotal and tragic event, ostensibly carried out by Joab to avenge the death of his brother Asahel, profoundly underscores the volatile political landscape during the consolidation of David's kingdom. It exposes the deep-seated personal grievances, ruthless power struggles, and unchecked ambition that plagued the nascent monarchy, highlighting the destructive consequences of deceit and vengeance in a period of transition and instability.
CONTEXT
EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS
Key Word Analysis
Verse Breakdown
Literary Devices
The narrative of Abner's murder is profoundly rich with Irony. Joab, David's fiercely loyal commander, betrays David's carefully orchestrated peace initiative by murdering Abner. This act is ostensibly for loyalty to his slain brother, but it is deeply intertwined with, and arguably driven by, Joab's personal ambition and desire to eliminate a rival. The chosen setting at the city gate, traditionally a place of public justice, legal proceedings, and covenant, becomes the clandestine site of a private, treacherous murder. This creates a stark and unsettling contrast between societal expectation and the brutal reality of the event. This act also serves as significant Foreshadowing, hinting at Joab's continued ruthlessness, his propensity for taking matters into his own hands, and David's recurring struggle to control his powerful and unyielding general. This conflict persists throughout David's reign and culminates in David's deathbed instructions regarding Joab, as recorded in 1 Kings 2:5-6. The narrative skillfully evokes Pathos through the tragic demise of Abner, a figure who had just committed to uniting all Israel under David, only to be cut down by deceitful violence. The "quiet" conversation leading to a violent and public death is a powerful form of Juxtaposition, underscoring the shocking and perfidious nature of Joab's betrayal.
THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS
The murder of Abner by Joab stands as a stark theological commentary on the profound complexities of establishing God's kingdom amidst human sin, ambition, and the lingering effects of a fallen world. While God had sovereignly chosen David to be king, the process of consolidating his reign was far from pristine, marked by acts of violence and treachery that frequently ran counter to divine justice and righteousness. Joab's act, driven by a potent mixture of personal vengeance and cold political expediency, highlights the inherent danger of individuals taking justice into their own hands, thereby usurping God's exclusive prerogative to avenge and judge. It underscores the constant tension between fallen human will and divine purpose, demonstrating how even those ostensibly serving God's anointed can act in ways that profoundly defy righteous principles and undermine the very peace they are meant to establish. This episode serves as a powerful and enduring reminder that true peace, unity, and the advancement of God's kingdom cannot be forged through deceit, bloodshed, or human manipulation, but rather require adherence to foundational principles of justice, reconciliation, and, ultimately, a humble reliance on God's perfect timing and methods.
REFLECTION AND APPLICATION
The tragic account of Abner's murder by Joab offers profound and enduring lessons for contemporary believers, confronting us with the destructive power of unchecked personal grievances and the insidious nature of ambition that often masquerades as loyalty or even justice. Joab's calculated act serves as a sobering reminder that even within communities dedicated to God's purposes, sin can fester, leading to betrayal, violence, and profound disunity. For us, this narrative calls for a deep and honest introspection into our own hearts: Do we harbor grudges, nurturing desires for personal retribution rather than seeking divine justice or reconciliation? Are we ever tempted to use noble pretexts or seemingly righteous causes to justify self-serving actions or to eliminate perceived rivals? The story challenges us to actively pursue forgiveness, to consciously lay down our desire for vengeance, and to humbly trust God's sovereign hand in righting wrongs and bringing about ultimate justice. It also highlights the immense responsibility of leadership, both spiritual and secular, to confront sin decisively and courageously, even when it emanates from those closest to us, and to diligently cultivate an environment of peace, integrity, and righteousness rather than allowing cycles of violence and ungodly ambition to perpetuate.
Questions for Reflection
FAQ
Why did Joab kill Abner, especially since Abner had killed Asahel in self-defense?
Answer: While Abner killed Asahel in battle, the narrative explicitly states it was in self-defense after Abner had repeatedly warned Asahel to cease his relentless pursuit (2 Samuel 2:22-23). Joab's act was likely driven by a complex interplay of motives. Firstly, the cultural expectation of "blood vengeance" (go'el haddam) for a slain family member was a powerful societal norm, even if the killing was unintentional. Secondly, and arguably more significantly, Abner's recent defection to David and his promise to unite all Israel under David's rule (2 Samuel 3:12-21) posed a direct and formidable political threat to Joab's established position as David's chief commander. Abner was a highly respected and formidable military leader, and his presence could have significantly diminished Joab's influence and authority within David's burgeoning kingdom. Thus, the "blood of Asahel" served as a convenient and culturally acceptable justification for what was likely a politically motivated assassination aimed at eliminating a powerful rival.
Did David approve of Abner's death?
Answer: No, David explicitly condemned Joab's actions and was deeply grieved and appalled by Abner's murder. 2 Samuel 3:28-30 records David's immediate public disassociation from the act, stating unequivocally that he and his kingdom were "guiltless before the Lord forever from the blood of Abner the son of Ner." David publicly mourned Abner, ordering his people to weep and even fasting himself as a sign of profound sorrow (2 Samuel 3:31-35). He lamented Abner's death as the tragic fall of a "prince and a great man in Israel" (2 Samuel 3:38) and openly expressed his frustration and helplessness over his inability to control the ruthless "sons of Zeruiah" (Joab and Abishai), acknowledging that they were "too hard for me" (2 Samuel 3:39). This public display of grief, condemnation, and moral outrage underscored David's innocence in the matter and his profound moral opposition to Joab's treachery.
CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT
The tragic narrative of Abner's murder, driven by human vengeance and political ambition, stands in stark and illuminating contrast to the nature of the true King, Jesus Christ, and the establishment of His eternal kingdom. While earthly kings like David struggled to control ruthless commanders and were often entangled in cycles of violence and compromise, Christ's reign is fundamentally founded upon principles of peace, perfect justice, and ultimate self-sacrifice. Joab's act of taking vengeance "for the blood of Asahel" highlights the Old Testament principle of "an eye for an eye," yet Christ teaches a higher, transformative law of love for enemies and turning the other cheek (Matthew 5:38-48). Unlike Joab, who shed innocent blood for personal gain and power, Jesus, the Lamb of God, willingly shed His own precious blood, not for vengeance, but for the ultimate reconciliation of all humanity to God (Colossians 1:19-20). He is the true "go'el," the kinsman-redeemer, who takes away the guilt of sin by absorbing the righteous wrath of God on the cross, thereby breaking the cycle of bloodshed and offering true atonement. His kingdom is not advanced through the sword, treachery, or political maneuvering (John 18:36), but through the transformative power of the Holy Spirit and the life-giving message of grace. Thus, Abner's death serves as a poignant reminder of the brokenness and inherent limitations of human kingdoms and powerfully points us to the perfect, peace-bringing reign of the Prince of Peace, Jesus Christ, whose ultimate sacrifice brings true justice, everlasting reconciliation, and an eternal kingdom of righteousness.