Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
That we also may be like all the nations; and that our king may judge us, and go out before us, and fight our battles.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
That we also may be like all the nations H1471; and that our king H4428 may judge H8199 us, and go out H3318 before H6440 us, and fight H3898 our battles H4421.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
so that we can be like all the nations, with our king to judge us, lead us and fight our battles."
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
Then we will be like all the other nations, with a king to judge us, to go out before us, and to fight our battles.”
Ask
American Standard Version
that we also may be like all the nations, and that our king may judge us, and go out before us, and fight our battles.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
that we also may be like all the nations, and that our king may judge us, and go out before us, and fight our battles.”
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
And we also will be like all other nations, and our King shall iudge vs, and goe out before vs, and fight our battels.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
and we have been, even we, like all the nations; and our king hath judged us, and gone out before us, and fought our battles.'
Ask

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

First Samuel 8:20 encapsulates the Israelites' unwavering demand for a human monarch, expressing their fervent desire to emulate the surrounding nations rather than maintaining their unique identity under God's direct rule. This pivotal declaration marks a profound and irreversible turning point in Israel's history, transitioning from a divinely ordained theocracy to a human-led monarchy, driven by a longing for perceived stability, military prowess, and conformity to the world's standards.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: This verse serves as the emphatic climax of a deeply significant and contentious exchange between the elders of Israel and the prophet Samuel, as detailed throughout 1 Samuel 8. The chapter opens with the elders approaching an aging Samuel, citing the corruption of his sons as judges and demanding a king "to judge us like all the nations" (1 Samuel 8:5). The Lord, however, reveals to Samuel that this request is not merely a rejection of Samuel's leadership but a profound and direct rejection of God Himself as their rightful King (1 Samuel 8:7). Despite Samuel's solemn and detailed warnings about the oppressive nature and burdensome "rights" of a human king—detailing the king's appropriation of their sons, daughters, fields, and servants (1 Samuel 8:11-18)—the people remain stubbornly resolute. Verse 20 represents their final, decisive insistence, demonstrating their preference for a visible, earthly ruler over their invisible, divine Sovereign, despite the clear warnings of the dire consequences.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: At this critical juncture, Israel was transitioning from a tribal confederacy, loosely united under the charismatic leadership of judges, to a centralized monarchy. Surrounding nations such as Egypt, Philistia, Moab, and Ammon were well-established monarchies, typically characterized by powerful, visible kings who commanded armies, administered justice, and provided a clear national identity. Israel, by contrast, had been governed by a unique theocratic system, where God raised up judges to deliver and rule His people. While divinely ordained, this system often lacked the outward pomp, unified military command, and dynastic succession common to their neighbors. The persistent and significant Philistine threat, vividly illustrated in earlier chapters of 1 Samuel, undoubtedly fueled the people's desire for a strong, centralized military leader, mirroring the perceived strength and stability of the nations around them. Their plea reflects a deep-seated desire for political and military parity, seeking security and status in the eyes of the world rather than relying on God's unique provision and protection.
  • Key Themes: The demand articulated in 1 Samuel 8:20 powerfully encapsulates several core themes within 1 Samuel and the broader Old Testament narrative. Foremost is the Rejection of Divine Rule and the Desire for Human Authority. The people's insistence on being "like all the nations" directly contravenes Israel's unique covenant identity as a people set apart by God, governed directly by Him (as seen in Exodus 19:5-6). This choice highlights a profound lack of faith in God's ability to protect and lead them, preferring a tangible human leader to fight their battles, despite God's consistent deliverance in the past (e.g., the Exodus, the victories under the Judges). Another critical theme is the Consequences of Conformity. While God graciously grants their request, this decision initiates a long and often troubled history of kingship in Israel, many of whom led the nation into idolatry and disobedience, ultimately contributing to the division of the kingdom and the exiles. It serves as a cautionary tale about prioritizing worldly acceptance and perceived security over divine wisdom and unique calling, echoing warnings found in Deuteronomy 17:14-20.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • Nations (Hebrew, gôwy', H1471): This term (H1471) refers to foreign peoples, often carrying a connotation of those outside of God's covenant and distinct from Israel. By explicitly desiring to be "like all the nations," Israel was not merely seeking a political structure but was expressing a profound desire to shed their unique, divinely-ordained identity as God's chosen, set-apart people. This phrase signifies a turning away from their sacred covenant relationship with Yahweh, who had delivered them from slavery and established them as His own.
  • King (Hebrew, melek', H4428): The Hebrew word for king (H4428) denotes a sovereign ruler. In this context, the people's demand for a "king" represents a fundamental shift from a theocratic system, where God was the ultimate, invisible King, to an anthropocentric one, where a visible, human leader would hold supreme authority. This desire for a human king to "judge us, and go out before us, and fight our battles" reveals a preference for tangible human strength and strategy over reliance on divine guidance and protection.
  • Fight (Hebrew, lâcham', H3898): The verb (H3898) means "to feed on; figuratively, to consume; by implication, to battle (as destruction)." The people's insistence that their king "fight our battles" (using the related noun H4421, milchâmâh, "battle") underscores their primary concern for military security and prowess. They desired a visible leader who would lead their armies into combat, rather than trusting in the Lord, who had historically fought for Israel (e.g., Exodus 14:14). This reveals a fundamental misunderstanding or distrust of God's role as their ultimate protector and deliverer.

Verse Breakdown

  • "That we also may be like all the nations;": This initial clause reveals the core motivation behind Israel's demand for a king: a profound desire for conformity and assimilation. They wished to shed their unique, divinely-ordained identity as a people set apart by God and instead adopt the political and social structures of the surrounding Gentile nations. This was a direct rejection of their distinct covenant relationship with Yahweh, who had called them to be a "kingdom of priests and a holy nation" (Exodus 19:6). Their aspiration was to blend in, rather than stand out as God's peculiar treasure.
  • "and that our king may judge us,": Here, the people articulate a specific, internal function they expect from their desired king. They wanted a visible, human authority figure to administer justice, resolve disputes, and govern their internal affairs, much like the judges had done, but now under a centralized, monarchical system. This desire for a king to "judge" them suggests a longing for stable and consistent leadership, perhaps in contrast to the perceived inconsistency or corruption of Samuel's sons, yet it overlooked God as the ultimate and perfect Judge.
  • "and go out before us,": This phrase signifies the king's role as a visible, active leader in daily life and public affairs, particularly in military and ceremonial contexts. It implies a leader who would lead them in processions, represent them publicly, and generally be a visible presence at the forefront of their national life. It speaks to a desire for a tangible figurehead who would embody their national identity and lead them in all aspects of their collective existence, providing a sense of order and direction.
  • "and fight our battles.": This final clause highlights the most pressing and pragmatic reason for their demand: military leadership and protection. Faced with ongoing threats from neighboring peoples, particularly the Philistines, the Israelites sought a king who would lead their armies into battle, providing a unified command structure and a visible symbol of national strength. This reveals a profound reliance on human military might and strategy rather than trusting in God as their ultimate warrior and deliverer, who had consistently fought for them throughout their history.

Literary Devices

The verse employs several powerful literary devices to convey its profound significance. Repetition and Parallelism are evident in the repeated "and that our king may..." structure, emphasizing the multiple roles the people expect from their human monarch (judge, go out, fight). This cumulative effect underscores their comprehensive desire for a human leader to replace divine rule. Irony is a central theme, as Israel's fervent desire to be "like all the nations" directly contradicts their unique calling to be a holy nation, set apart by God. This ironic plea highlights their spiritual blindness and their rejection of the very identity that made them special. Furthermore, the verse establishes a stark Contrast between the people's longing for a visible, earthly king and God's invisible, yet omnipresent and omnipotent, kingship. This contrast underscores the tension between human desire for control and reliance on divine sovereignty, a tension that permeates the entire narrative of 1 Samuel and the broader Old Testament.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

The Israelites' demand in 1 Samuel 8:20 for a king "like all the nations" is a profound theological statement, revealing a deep-seated spiritual malaise. It represents a rejection of God's unique covenant relationship with Israel, where He Himself was their direct sovereign, and a preference for human conformity and perceived security over divine guidance. This decision highlights the perennial human temptation to rely on visible, tangible solutions and leaders rather than trusting in the unseen, yet all-powerful, hand of God. It underscores the dangers of prioritizing worldly acceptance and political expediency over spiritual distinctiveness and faithfulness to God's unique calling. While God graciously granted their request, the narrative of Israel's monarchy, replete with both righteous and wicked kings, demonstrates the often-tragic consequences of choosing human wisdom over divine wisdom.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

The Israelites' plea in 1 Samuel 8:20 serves as a timeless mirror for believers today, challenging us to examine the inclinations of our own hearts. Their desire to be "like all the nations" is a potent warning against the subtle, yet pervasive, pressure to conform to worldly standards, values, and systems, rather than embracing our distinct identity as God's chosen people. Do we, like Israel, sometimes prioritize human solutions, visible leadership, or societal acceptance over radical trust in God's unseen hand and unconventional ways? Are we willing to be peculiar, set apart by our faith and obedience, even when it means standing against the tide of popular opinion or perceived wisdom? This passage calls us to a deeper faith, reminding us that true security and flourishing come not from blending in with the world, but from being distinctly devoted to God, allowing Him to be our ultimate King, Judge, and Defender in all areas of life. It compels us to consider whether our pursuit of comfort, popularity, or earthly success subtly undermines our unique calling to reflect Christ in a fallen world.

Questions for Reflection

  • In what areas of my life or in the church do I feel the pressure to conform to "the nations" (worldly standards or practices) rather than embracing God's distinct call?
  • What "battles" am I trying to fight in my own strength or seeking human leaders to fight for me, instead of trusting God as my ultimate deliverer?
  • How does my desire for visible leadership, tangible solutions, or immediate gratification sometimes overshadow my trust in God's invisible, sovereign rule?
  • What are the potential consequences of prioritizing worldly acceptance over spiritual distinctiveness in my personal life or in my community of faith?

FAQ

Why did God allow Israel to have a king if He was displeased with their request?

Answer: God, in His sovereignty, often grants human requests even when they stem from flawed motives or a lack of faith, demonstrating both His patience and His willingness to work within human choices. While God expressed His profound displeasure, stating that Israel had rejected Him as their king (1 Samuel 8:7), He also knew that a monarchy was part of His long-term redemptive plan for Israel, as hinted in earlier prophecies (e.g., Deuteronomy 17:14-20). By allowing them a king, God exposed the true nature of their hearts and allowed them to experience the consequences of their choice, which ultimately set the stage for the coming of the true, perfect King, Jesus Christ. It was a concession that served a greater redemptive purpose, revealing the inherent limitations of human kingship and the ultimate need for a divine, perfect King.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

The Israelites' demand for a king "like all the nations" in 1 Samuel 8:20 starkly contrasts with the ultimate King, Jesus Christ, who perfectly fulfills and transcends the concept of kingship. While Israel desired a king to "fight our battles" in a physical sense, Jesus is the King who fights and wins the ultimate spiritual battle against sin, death, and the powers of darkness, triumphing over them on the cross (Colossians 2:15). Unlike the kings of the nations who often ruled with oppression and self-interest, Jesus's kingship is characterized by humble service (Mark 10:45), righteous judgment (Isaiah 11:3-4), and sacrificial love, as He laid down His life for His people (John 10:11). The Israelites sought a visible king to "go out before us," but Christ is the unseen, yet ever-present, King of kings and Lord of lords, whose kingdom is not of this world (John 18:36), yet extends over all creation and all authority (Ephesians 1:20-23). He is the true King who perfectly judges, leads, and fights for His people, offering not just temporal security but eternal salvation and an everlasting kingdom that will never end (Revelation 11:15).

Copy as

Commentary on 1 Samuel 8 verses 4–22

I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points(1.) (2.) Details

We have here the starting of a matter perfectly new and surprising, which was the setting up of kingly government in Israel. Perhaps the thing had been often talked of among them by those that were given to change and affected that which looked great. But we do not find that it was ever till now publicly proposed and debated. Abimelech was little better than a titular king, though he is said to reign over Israel (Jdg 9:22), and perhaps his fall had for a great while rendered the title of king odious in Israel, as that of Tarquinius did among the Romans; but, if it had, by this time the odium was worn off, and some bold steps are here taken towards so great a revolution as that amounted to. Here is,

I. The address of the elders to Samuel in this matter (Sa1 8:4, Sa1 8:5): They gathered themselves together, by common consent; and not in a riotous tumultuous manner, but with the respect due to his character, they came to him to his house as Ramah with their address, which contained,

1.A remonstrance of their grievances: in short, Thou art old, and thy sons walk not in thy ways. Many a fairer occasion that people had had to ask a king, when they were oppressed by their neighbours or embroiled at home for want of a king in Israel, but a small thing will serve factious spirits for a colour to desire a change. (1.) It was true that Samuel was old; but if that made him less able to ride the circuit, and sit long on the bench, yet it made him the more wise and experienced, and, upon that account, the fitter to rule. If he was old, had he not grown old in their service? And it was very unkind, ungrateful, nay, and unjust, to cast him off when he was old, who had spent his days in doing them good. God had saved his youth from being despicable (Sa1 3:20), yet they make his old age so, which should have been counted worthy of double honour. If old people be upbraided with their infirmities, and laid aside for them, let them not think it strange; Samuel himself was so. (2.) It was true that his sons did not walk in his ways; the more was his grief, but they could not say it was his fault: he had not, like Eli, indulged them in their badness, but was ready to receive complaints against them. And, if that had been the thing desired, we may well suppose, upon the making out of the charge of bribery against them he would have superseded their commissions and punished them. But this would not content the elders of Israel; they had another project in their head.

2.A petition for the redress of these grievances, by setting a king over them: Make us a king to judge us like all the nations. Thus far it was well, that they did not rise up in rebellion against Samuel and set up a king for themselves, vi et armis - by force; but they applied to Samuel, God's prophet, and humbly begged of him to do it. But it appears by what follows that it was an evil proposal and ill made, and was displeasing to God. God designed them a king, a man after his own heart, when Samuel was dead; but they would anticipate God's counsel, and would have one now that Samuel was old. They had a prophet to judge them, that had immediate correspondence with heaven, and therein they were great and happy above any nation, none having God so nigh unto them as they had, Deu 4:7. But this would not serve; they must have a king to judge them with external pomp and power, like all the nations. A poor prophet in a mantle, though conversant in the visions of the Almighty, looked mean in the eyes of those who judged by outward appearance; but a king in a purple robe, with his guards and officers of state, would look great: and such a one they must have. They knew it was in vain to court Samuel to take upon him the title and dignity of a king, but he must appoint them one. They do not say, "Give us a king that is wise and good, and will judge better than thy sons do," but, "Give us a king," any body that will but make a figure. Thus foolishly did they forsake their own mercies, and, under pretence of advancing the dignity of their nation to that of their neighbours, did really thrust themselves down from their own excellency, and profane their crown by casting it to the ground.

II. Samuel's resentment of this address, Sa1 8:6. Let us see how he took it. 1. It cut him to the heart. Probably it was a surprise to him, and he had not any intimation before of their design, which made it the more grievous. The thing displeased Samuel; not when they upbraided him with his own infirmities and his children's irregularities (he could patiently bear what reflected on himself and his own family), but it displeased him when they said, Give us a king to judge us, because that reflected upon God and his honour. 2. It drove him to his knees; he gave them no answer for the present, but took time to consider of what they proposed, and prayed unto the Lord for direction what to do, spreading the case before him and leaving it with him, and so making himself easy. Samuel was a man much in prayer, and we are encouraged in every thing to make our requests known to God, Phi 4:6. When any thing disturbs us, it is our interest, as well as our duty, to show before God our trouble, and he gives us leave to be humbly free with him.

III. The instruction God gave him concerning this matter. Those that in straits seek to God shall find him nigh unto them, and ready to direct them. He tells him,

1.That which would be an allay to his displeasure. Samuel was much disturbed at the proposal: it troubled him greatly to see his prophetic office thus slighted, and all the good turns he had done to Israel thus ungratefully returned; but God tells him he must not think it either hard or strange. (1.) He must not think it hard that they had put this slight upon him, for they had herein put a slight upon God himself: "They have not rejected thee only, but they have rejected me. I share with thee in the affront," Sa1 8:7. Note, If God interest himself in the indignities that are done us, and the contempts that are put upon us, we may well afford to bear them patiently; nor need we think the worse of ourselves if for his sake we bear reproach (Psa 69:7), but rather rejoice and count it an honour, Col 1:24. Samuel must not complain that they were weary of his government, though just and gentle, for really they were weary of God's government; this was what they disliked: They have rejected me, that I should not reign over them. God reigns over the heathen (Psa 47:8), over all the world, but the government of Israel had hitherto been, in a more peculiar manner than ever any government was, a Theocracy, a divine government; their judges had their call and commission immediately from God; the affairs of their nation were under his peculiar direction. As the constitution, so the administration of their government, was by Thus saith the Lord; this method they were weary of, though it was their honour and safety, above any thing, so long as they kept in with God. They were indeed so much the more exposed to calamities if they provoked God to anger by sin, and found they could not transgress at so cheap a rate as other nations could, which perhaps was the true reason why they desired to stand upon the same terms with God that other nations did. (2.) He must not think it strange, nor marvel at the matter, for they do as they always have done: According to all the works which they have done, since the day that I brought them out of Egypt, so do they unto thee, Sa1 8:8; They had at first been so very respectful and obsequious to Samuel that he began to hope they were cured of their old stubborn disposition; but now he found himself deceived in them, and must not be surprised at it. They had always been rude to their governors, witness Moses and Aaron; nay, They have forsaken me and served other gods; the greatness of their crime, in affecting new gods, may make this crime of affecting new governors seem little. Samuel might expect they would deal treacherously, for they were called transgressors from the womb, Isa 48:8. This had been their manner from their youth up, Jer 22:21.

2.He tells him that which would be an answer to their demand. Samuel would not have known what to say if God had not instructed him. Should he oppose the motion, it would bespeak a greater fondness of power and dominion than did become a prophet, and an indulgence of his sons. Should he yield to the motion, it would look like the betraying of his trust, and he would become accessory to all the bad consequences of a change. Aaron sinned in gratifying the people when they said, Make us gods; Samuel dares not therefore comply with them when they say, Make us a king, but he gives them, with assurance, the answer God sent them.

(1.)He must tell them that they shall have a king. Hearken to the voice of the people, Sa1 8:7, and again, Sa1 8:9. Not that God was pleased with their request, but, as sometimes he crosses us in love, so at other times he gratifies us in wrath; he did so here. When they said, Give us a king and princes he gave them a king in his anger (see Hos 13:10, Hos 13:11), as he gave them quails, Psa 106:15; Psa 78:29. God bade Samuel humour them in this matter, [1.] That they might be beaten with their own rod, and might feel, to their cost, the difference between his government and the government of a king; see Ch2 12:8. It soon appeared how much worse their condition was, in all respects, under Saul, than it had been under Samuel. [2.] To prevent something worse. If they were not gratified, they would either rise in rebellion against Samuel or universally revolt from their religion and admit the gods of the nations, that they might have kings like them. Rather than so, let them have a king. [3.] God knows how to bring glory to himself out of it, and to serve his own wise purposes even by their foolish counsels.

(2.)But he must tell them, withal, that when they have a king they will soon have enough of him, and will, when it is too late, repent of their choice. This he must protest solemnly to them (Sa1 8:9), that, if they would have a king to rule them, as the eastern kings ruled their subjects, they would find the yoke exceedingly heavy. They looked only at the pomp or magnificence of a king, and thought that would make their nation great and considerable among its neighbours, and would strike a terror upon their enemies; but he must bid them consider how they would like to bear the charges of that pomp, and how they would endure that arbitrary power which the neighbouring kings assumed. Note, Those that set their hearts inordinately upon any thing in this world ought, for the moderating of their desires, to consider the inconveniences as well as the conveniences that will attend it, and to set the one over against the other in their thoughts. Those that submit to the government of the world and the flesh are told plainly what hard masters they are, and what a tyranny the dominion of sin is; and yet they will exchange God's government for it.

IV. Samuel's faithful delivery of God's mind to them, Sa1 8:10. He told them all the words of the Lord, how ill he resented it, that he construed it a rejecting of him, and compared it with their serving other gods, - that he would grant their request if they insisted on it, but withal had ordered him to represent to them the certain consequences of their choice, that they would be such that if they had any reason left them, and would allow themselves to consult their own interest, they would withdraw their petition, and beg to continue as they were. Accordingly he lays before them, very particularly, what would be, not the right of a king in general, but the manner of the king that should reign over them, according to the pattern of the nations, Sa1 8:11. Samuel does not speak (as bishop Patrick expounds it) of a just and honest right of a king to do these things, for his right is quite otherwise described in that part of Moses's law which concerns the king's duty, but such a right as the kings of the nations had then acquired. This shall be the manner of the king, that is, "thus he must support his dignity at the expense of that which is dearest to you, and thus he will abuse his power, as those that have power are apt to do; and, having the militia in his hand, you will be under a necessity of submitting to him."

1.If they will have such a king as the nations have, let them consider, (1.) That king must have a great retinue, abundance of servants to wait on him, grooms to look after his chariots and horses, gentlemen to ride about with him, and footmen to run before his chariots. This is the chief grandeur of princes, and the imaginary glory of great men, to have a multitude of attendants. And whence must he have these? "Why, he will take your sons, who are free-born, have a liberal education, and whom you now have at your own disposal, and will appoint them for himself," Sa1 8:11. They must wait upon him, and be at his beck; those that used to work for their parents and themselves must work for him, ear his ground, and reap his harvest (Sa1 8:12), and count it their preferment too, Sa1 8:16. This would be a great change. (2.) He must keep a great table; he will not be content to dine with his neighbours upon a sacrifice, as Samuel used to do (Sa1 9:13); but he must have a variety of dainty dishes, forced meats, and sweet-meats, and delicate sauces; and who must prepare him these? "Why, he will take your daughters, the most ingenious and handy of them, whom you hoped to prefer to houses and tables of their own; and, whether you be willing or no, they must be his confectioners, and cooks, and bakers, and the like." (3.) "He must needs have a standing army, for guards and garrisons; and your sons, instead of being elders of your cities, and living in quiet and honour at home, must be captains over thousands and captains over fifties, and must be disposed of at the pleasure of the sovereign." (4.) "You may expect that he will have great favourites, whom, having dignified and ennobled, he must enrich, and give them estates suitable to their honour; and which way can he do that, but out of your inheritances? Sa1 8:14. He will take your fields and vineyards, which descended to you from your ancestors, and which you hoped to leave to your posterity after you, even the best of them; and will not only take them to himself (you could bear that better), but he will give them to his servants, who will be your masters, and bear rule over that for which you have laboured, How will you like that?" (5.) "He must have great revenues to maintain his grandeur and power with; and whence must he have them but from you? He will take the tenth of the fruits of your ground (Sa1 8:15), and your cattle, Sa1 8:17. You think the tenths, the double tenths, which the law of God has appointed for the support of the church, grievous enough, and grudge the payment of them; but, if you have a king, there must issue another tenth out of your estates, which will be levied with more rigour, for the support of the royal dignity. Consider the expense with the magnificence, and whether it will quit cost."

2.These would be their grievances, and, (1.) They would have none but God to complain to. Once they complained to the prince himself, and were answered, according to the manner of the king, Your yoke is heavy, and I will add to it, Kg1 12:11. (2.) When they complained to God he would not hear them, Sa1 8:18. Nor could they expect that he should, both because they had been deaf to his calls and admonitions, and this trouble, in particular, they had brought upon themselves by rejecting him, and would not believe when he told them what would come of it. Note, When we bring ourselves into distress by our own irregular desires and projects we justly forfeit the comfort of prayer and the benefit of divine aids, and, if God be not better to us than we deserve, must have our relief in our own hands, and then it is bad with us.

V. The people's obstinacy in their demand, Sa1 8:19, Sa1 8:20. One would think such a representation of the consequences as this was, coming from God himself, who can neither deceive by his word nor be deceived in his knowledge, should have prevailed with them to waive their request: but their hearts were upon it, right or wrong, good or evil: "We will have a king over us, whatever God or Samuel say to the contrary; we will have a king, whatever it cost us, and whatever inconvenience we bring upon ourselves or our posterity by it." See their folly. 1. They were quite deaf to reason and blind to their own interest. They could not answer Samuel's arguments against it, nor deny the force of them, and yet they grow more violent in their request, and more insolent. Before it was, "Pray, make us a king;" now it is, "Nay, but we will have a king; yea, that we will, because we will; nor will we bear to have any thing said against it." See the absurdity of inordinate desires, and how they rob men of their reason. 2. They could not stay God's time. God had intimated to them in the law that, in due time, Israel should have a king (Deu 17:14, Deu 17:15), and perhaps they had some intimation that the time was at hand; but they are all in haste: "We, in our day, will have this king over us." Could they but have waited ten or twelve years longer they would have had David, a king of God's giving in mercy, and all the calamities that attended the setting up of Saul would have been prevented. Sudden resolves and hasty desires make work for a long and leisurely repentance. 3. That which they aimed at in desiring a king was not only, as before, that they might be like the nations, and levelled with the one above whom God had so far advanced them, but that they might have one to judge them, and to go out before them when they took the field, and to fight their battles. Foolish people and unwise! Could they ever desire a battle better fought for them that the last was, by Samuel's prayer and God's thunder? Sa1 7:10. Was victory hereby too sure to them? And were they fond of trying the chance of war at the same uncertainty that others did? So sick, it seems, were they of their privileges: and what was the issue? Their first king was slain in a battle, which none of their judges ever were; so was Josiah, one of the last and best.

VI. The dismissing of them with an intimation that very shortly they should have what they asked. 1. Samuel rehearsed all their words in the ears of the Lord, v. 21. Not but that God perfectly knew it, without Samuel's report; but thus he dealt faithfully between God and Israel, as a prophet, returning the answer to him that sent him; and thus he waited on God for further direction. God is fully acquainted with the state of the case we are in care and doubt about, but he will know it from us. His rehearsing it in the ears of the Lord intimates that it was done in private; for the people were not disposed to join with him in prayer to God for direction in this matter; also it bespeaks a holy familiarity, to which God graciously admits his people: they speak in the ears of the Lord, as one friend whispers with another; their communion with God is meat they have to eat which the world knows not of, Joh 4:32. 2. God gave direction that they should have a king, since they were so inordinately set upon it (Sa1 8:22): "Make them a king, and let them make their best of him, and thank themselves if that very pomp and power which they are so eager to see their sovereign in be their plague and burden." So he gave them up to their own hearts' lusts. Samuel told them this, but sent them home for the present, every man to his city; for the designation of the person must be left to God; they had now no more to do. When God saw fit to notify the choice to Samuel they should hear further from him; in the mean time let them keep the peace and expect the issue.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 4–22. Public domain.
Copy as
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying 1 Samuel 8:20 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.