TRV
See on the biblical-era map
Study This Verse
Commentary on 1 Samuel 8 verses 4–22
We have here the starting of a matter perfectly new and surprising, which was the setting up of kingly government in Israel. Perhaps the thing had been often talked of among them by those that were given to change and affected that which looked great. But we do not find that it was ever till now publicly proposed and debated. Abimelech was little better than a titular king, though he is said to reign over Israel (Jdg 9:22), and perhaps his fall had for a great while rendered the title of king odious in Israel, as that of Tarquinius did among the Romans; but, if it had, by this time the odium was worn off, and some bold steps are here taken towards so great a revolution as that amounted to. Here is,
I. The address of the elders to Samuel in this matter (Sa1 8:4, Sa1 8:5): They gathered themselves together, by common consent; and not in a riotous tumultuous manner, but with the respect due to his character, they came to him to his house as Ramah with their address, which contained,
1.A remonstrance of their grievances: in short, Thou art old, and thy sons walk not in thy ways. Many a fairer occasion that people had had to ask a king, when they were oppressed by their neighbours or embroiled at home for want of a king in Israel, but a small thing will serve factious spirits for a colour to desire a change. (1.) It was true that Samuel was old; but if that made him less able to ride the circuit, and sit long on the bench, yet it made him the more wise and experienced, and, upon that account, the fitter to rule. If he was old, had he not grown old in their service? And it was very unkind, ungrateful, nay, and unjust, to cast him off when he was old, who had spent his days in doing them good. God had saved his youth from being despicable (Sa1 3:20), yet they make his old age so, which should have been counted worthy of double honour. If old people be upbraided with their infirmities, and laid aside for them, let them not think it strange; Samuel himself was so. (2.) It was true that his sons did not walk in his ways; the more was his grief, but they could not say it was his fault: he had not, like Eli, indulged them in their badness, but was ready to receive complaints against them. And, if that had been the thing desired, we may well suppose, upon the making out of the charge of bribery against them he would have superseded their commissions and punished them. But this would not content the elders of Israel; they had another project in their head.
2.A petition for the redress of these grievances, by setting a king over them: Make us a king to judge us like all the nations. Thus far it was well, that they did not rise up in rebellion against Samuel and set up a king for themselves, vi et armis - by force; but they applied to Samuel, God's prophet, and humbly begged of him to do it. But it appears by what follows that it was an evil proposal and ill made, and was displeasing to God. God designed them a king, a man after his own heart, when Samuel was dead; but they would anticipate God's counsel, and would have one now that Samuel was old. They had a prophet to judge them, that had immediate correspondence with heaven, and therein they were great and happy above any nation, none having God so nigh unto them as they had, Deu 4:7. But this would not serve; they must have a king to judge them with external pomp and power, like all the nations. A poor prophet in a mantle, though conversant in the visions of the Almighty, looked mean in the eyes of those who judged by outward appearance; but a king in a purple robe, with his guards and officers of state, would look great: and such a one they must have. They knew it was in vain to court Samuel to take upon him the title and dignity of a king, but he must appoint them one. They do not say, "Give us a king that is wise and good, and will judge better than thy sons do," but, "Give us a king," any body that will but make a figure. Thus foolishly did they forsake their own mercies, and, under pretence of advancing the dignity of their nation to that of their neighbours, did really thrust themselves down from their own excellency, and profane their crown by casting it to the ground.
II. Samuel's resentment of this address, Sa1 8:6. Let us see how he took it. 1. It cut him to the heart. Probably it was a surprise to him, and he had not any intimation before of their design, which made it the more grievous. The thing displeased Samuel; not when they upbraided him with his own infirmities and his children's irregularities (he could patiently bear what reflected on himself and his own family), but it displeased him when they said, Give us a king to judge us, because that reflected upon God and his honour. 2. It drove him to his knees; he gave them no answer for the present, but took time to consider of what they proposed, and prayed unto the Lord for direction what to do, spreading the case before him and leaving it with him, and so making himself easy. Samuel was a man much in prayer, and we are encouraged in every thing to make our requests known to God, Phi 4:6. When any thing disturbs us, it is our interest, as well as our duty, to show before God our trouble, and he gives us leave to be humbly free with him.
III. The instruction God gave him concerning this matter. Those that in straits seek to God shall find him nigh unto them, and ready to direct them. He tells him,
1.That which would be an allay to his displeasure. Samuel was much disturbed at the proposal: it troubled him greatly to see his prophetic office thus slighted, and all the good turns he had done to Israel thus ungratefully returned; but God tells him he must not think it either hard or strange. (1.) He must not think it hard that they had put this slight upon him, for they had herein put a slight upon God himself: "They have not rejected thee only, but they have rejected me. I share with thee in the affront," Sa1 8:7. Note, If God interest himself in the indignities that are done us, and the contempts that are put upon us, we may well afford to bear them patiently; nor need we think the worse of ourselves if for his sake we bear reproach (Psa 69:7), but rather rejoice and count it an honour, Col 1:24. Samuel must not complain that they were weary of his government, though just and gentle, for really they were weary of God's government; this was what they disliked: They have rejected me, that I should not reign over them. God reigns over the heathen (Psa 47:8), over all the world, but the government of Israel had hitherto been, in a more peculiar manner than ever any government was, a Theocracy, a divine government; their judges had their call and commission immediately from God; the affairs of their nation were under his peculiar direction. As the constitution, so the administration of their government, was by Thus saith the Lord; this method they were weary of, though it was their honour and safety, above any thing, so long as they kept in with God. They were indeed so much the more exposed to calamities if they provoked God to anger by sin, and found they could not transgress at so cheap a rate as other nations could, which perhaps was the true reason why they desired to stand upon the same terms with God that other nations did. (2.) He must not think it strange, nor marvel at the matter, for they do as they always have done: According to all the works which they have done, since the day that I brought them out of Egypt, so do they unto thee, Sa1 8:8; They had at first been so very respectful and obsequious to Samuel that he began to hope they were cured of their old stubborn disposition; but now he found himself deceived in them, and must not be surprised at it. They had always been rude to their governors, witness Moses and Aaron; nay, They have forsaken me and served other gods; the greatness of their crime, in affecting new gods, may make this crime of affecting new governors seem little. Samuel might expect they would deal treacherously, for they were called transgressors from the womb, Isa 48:8. This had been their manner from their youth up, Jer 22:21.
2.He tells him that which would be an answer to their demand. Samuel would not have known what to say if God had not instructed him. Should he oppose the motion, it would bespeak a greater fondness of power and dominion than did become a prophet, and an indulgence of his sons. Should he yield to the motion, it would look like the betraying of his trust, and he would become accessory to all the bad consequences of a change. Aaron sinned in gratifying the people when they said, Make us gods; Samuel dares not therefore comply with them when they say, Make us a king, but he gives them, with assurance, the answer God sent them.
(1.)He must tell them that they shall have a king. Hearken to the voice of the people, Sa1 8:7, and again, Sa1 8:9. Not that God was pleased with their request, but, as sometimes he crosses us in love, so at other times he gratifies us in wrath; he did so here. When they said, Give us a king and princes he gave them a king in his anger (see Hos 13:10, Hos 13:11), as he gave them quails, Psa 106:15; Psa 78:29. God bade Samuel humour them in this matter, [1.] That they might be beaten with their own rod, and might feel, to their cost, the difference between his government and the government of a king; see Ch2 12:8. It soon appeared how much worse their condition was, in all respects, under Saul, than it had been under Samuel. [2.] To prevent something worse. If they were not gratified, they would either rise in rebellion against Samuel or universally revolt from their religion and admit the gods of the nations, that they might have kings like them. Rather than so, let them have a king. [3.] God knows how to bring glory to himself out of it, and to serve his own wise purposes even by their foolish counsels.
(2.)But he must tell them, withal, that when they have a king they will soon have enough of him, and will, when it is too late, repent of their choice. This he must protest solemnly to them (Sa1 8:9), that, if they would have a king to rule them, as the eastern kings ruled their subjects, they would find the yoke exceedingly heavy. They looked only at the pomp or magnificence of a king, and thought that would make their nation great and considerable among its neighbours, and would strike a terror upon their enemies; but he must bid them consider how they would like to bear the charges of that pomp, and how they would endure that arbitrary power which the neighbouring kings assumed. Note, Those that set their hearts inordinately upon any thing in this world ought, for the moderating of their desires, to consider the inconveniences as well as the conveniences that will attend it, and to set the one over against the other in their thoughts. Those that submit to the government of the world and the flesh are told plainly what hard masters they are, and what a tyranny the dominion of sin is; and yet they will exchange God's government for it.
IV. Samuel's faithful delivery of God's mind to them, Sa1 8:10. He told them all the words of the Lord, how ill he resented it, that he construed it a rejecting of him, and compared it with their serving other gods, - that he would grant their request if they insisted on it, but withal had ordered him to represent to them the certain consequences of their choice, that they would be such that if they had any reason left them, and would allow themselves to consult their own interest, they would withdraw their petition, and beg to continue as they were. Accordingly he lays before them, very particularly, what would be, not the right of a king in general, but the manner of the king that should reign over them, according to the pattern of the nations, Sa1 8:11. Samuel does not speak (as bishop Patrick expounds it) of a just and honest right of a king to do these things, for his right is quite otherwise described in that part of Moses's law which concerns the king's duty, but such a right as the kings of the nations had then acquired. This shall be the manner of the king, that is, "thus he must support his dignity at the expense of that which is dearest to you, and thus he will abuse his power, as those that have power are apt to do; and, having the militia in his hand, you will be under a necessity of submitting to him."
1.If they will have such a king as the nations have, let them consider, (1.) That king must have a great retinue, abundance of servants to wait on him, grooms to look after his chariots and horses, gentlemen to ride about with him, and footmen to run before his chariots. This is the chief grandeur of princes, and the imaginary glory of great men, to have a multitude of attendants. And whence must he have these? "Why, he will take your sons, who are free-born, have a liberal education, and whom you now have at your own disposal, and will appoint them for himself," Sa1 8:11. They must wait upon him, and be at his beck; those that used to work for their parents and themselves must work for him, ear his ground, and reap his harvest (Sa1 8:12), and count it their preferment too, Sa1 8:16. This would be a great change. (2.) He must keep a great table; he will not be content to dine with his neighbours upon a sacrifice, as Samuel used to do (Sa1 9:13); but he must have a variety of dainty dishes, forced meats, and sweet-meats, and delicate sauces; and who must prepare him these? "Why, he will take your daughters, the most ingenious and handy of them, whom you hoped to prefer to houses and tables of their own; and, whether you be willing or no, they must be his confectioners, and cooks, and bakers, and the like." (3.) "He must needs have a standing army, for guards and garrisons; and your sons, instead of being elders of your cities, and living in quiet and honour at home, must be captains over thousands and captains over fifties, and must be disposed of at the pleasure of the sovereign." (4.) "You may expect that he will have great favourites, whom, having dignified and ennobled, he must enrich, and give them estates suitable to their honour; and which way can he do that, but out of your inheritances? Sa1 8:14. He will take your fields and vineyards, which descended to you from your ancestors, and which you hoped to leave to your posterity after you, even the best of them; and will not only take them to himself (you could bear that better), but he will give them to his servants, who will be your masters, and bear rule over that for which you have laboured, How will you like that?" (5.) "He must have great revenues to maintain his grandeur and power with; and whence must he have them but from you? He will take the tenth of the fruits of your ground (Sa1 8:15), and your cattle, Sa1 8:17. You think the tenths, the double tenths, which the law of God has appointed for the support of the church, grievous enough, and grudge the payment of them; but, if you have a king, there must issue another tenth out of your estates, which will be levied with more rigour, for the support of the royal dignity. Consider the expense with the magnificence, and whether it will quit cost."
2.These would be their grievances, and, (1.) They would have none but God to complain to. Once they complained to the prince himself, and were answered, according to the manner of the king, Your yoke is heavy, and I will add to it, Kg1 12:11. (2.) When they complained to God he would not hear them, Sa1 8:18. Nor could they expect that he should, both because they had been deaf to his calls and admonitions, and this trouble, in particular, they had brought upon themselves by rejecting him, and would not believe when he told them what would come of it. Note, When we bring ourselves into distress by our own irregular desires and projects we justly forfeit the comfort of prayer and the benefit of divine aids, and, if God be not better to us than we deserve, must have our relief in our own hands, and then it is bad with us.
V. The people's obstinacy in their demand, Sa1 8:19, Sa1 8:20. One would think such a representation of the consequences as this was, coming from God himself, who can neither deceive by his word nor be deceived in his knowledge, should have prevailed with them to waive their request: but their hearts were upon it, right or wrong, good or evil: "We will have a king over us, whatever God or Samuel say to the contrary; we will have a king, whatever it cost us, and whatever inconvenience we bring upon ourselves or our posterity by it." See their folly. 1. They were quite deaf to reason and blind to their own interest. They could not answer Samuel's arguments against it, nor deny the force of them, and yet they grow more violent in their request, and more insolent. Before it was, "Pray, make us a king;" now it is, "Nay, but we will have a king; yea, that we will, because we will; nor will we bear to have any thing said against it." See the absurdity of inordinate desires, and how they rob men of their reason. 2. They could not stay God's time. God had intimated to them in the law that, in due time, Israel should have a king (Deu 17:14, Deu 17:15), and perhaps they had some intimation that the time was at hand; but they are all in haste: "We, in our day, will have this king over us." Could they but have waited ten or twelve years longer they would have had David, a king of God's giving in mercy, and all the calamities that attended the setting up of Saul would have been prevented. Sudden resolves and hasty desires make work for a long and leisurely repentance. 3. That which they aimed at in desiring a king was not only, as before, that they might be like the nations, and levelled with the one above whom God had so far advanced them, but that they might have one to judge them, and to go out before them when they took the field, and to fight their battles. Foolish people and unwise! Could they ever desire a battle better fought for them that the last was, by Samuel's prayer and God's thunder? Sa1 7:10. Was victory hereby too sure to them? And were they fond of trying the chance of war at the same uncertainty that others did? So sick, it seems, were they of their privileges: and what was the issue? Their first king was slain in a battle, which none of their judges ever were; so was Josiah, one of the last and best.
VI. The dismissing of them with an intimation that very shortly they should have what they asked. 1. Samuel rehearsed all their words in the ears of the Lord, v. 21. Not but that God perfectly knew it, without Samuel's report; but thus he dealt faithfully between God and Israel, as a prophet, returning the answer to him that sent him; and thus he waited on God for further direction. God is fully acquainted with the state of the case we are in care and doubt about, but he will know it from us. His rehearsing it in the ears of the Lord intimates that it was done in private; for the people were not disposed to join with him in prayer to God for direction in this matter; also it bespeaks a holy familiarity, to which God graciously admits his people: they speak in the ears of the Lord, as one friend whispers with another; their communion with God is meat they have to eat which the world knows not of, Joh 4:32. 2. God gave direction that they should have a king, since they were so inordinately set upon it (Sa1 8:22): "Make them a king, and let them make their best of him, and thank themselves if that very pomp and power which they are so eager to see their sovereign in be their plague and burden." So he gave them up to their own hearts' lusts. Samuel told them this, but sent them home for the present, every man to his city; for the designation of the person must be left to God; they had now no more to do. When God saw fit to notify the choice to Samuel they should hear further from him; in the mean time let them keep the peace and expect the issue.
Continue studying 1 Samuel 8:21 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
SefariaThe Hebrew text with Rashi and centuries of Jewish commentary.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
SUMMARY
1 Samuel 8:21 captures a pivotal moment in Israel's transition from a theocracy to a monarchy, underscoring the faithful and indispensable mediating role of the prophet Samuel. Despite his personal displeasure and God's clear warnings regarding the people's misguided demand for a human king, Samuel diligently and accurately presented their entire petition to the Lord, demonstrating his unwavering commitment to his prophetic office and the principle of bringing all matters before divine counsel.
CONTEXT
Literary Context: This verse is deeply embedded within a critical narrative arc detailing Israel's rejection of God's direct rule and their insistence on having a king "like all the nations" as articulated in 1 Samuel 8:5. Immediately preceding this, the elders of Israel approached Samuel, citing his advanced age and the corruption of his sons as their justification for this radical demand, as recorded in 1 Samuel 8:4. Samuel was profoundly displeased by their request, a displeasure that the Lord Himself clarified was not a rejection of Samuel personally, but rather a profound rejection of God's own kingship over them, as revealed in 1 Samuel 8:7. God then instructed Samuel to sternly warn the people about the oppressive nature and burdens inherent in monarchy, detailing the king's "rights" and the people's future servitude, a stark prophecy found in 1 Samuel 8:11-18. Despite these dire warnings, the people remained obstinate, emphatically declaring, "No! But we will have a king over us" in 1 Samuel 8:19. It is against this backdrop of human stubbornness and divine patience that Samuel, acting as the faithful intermediary, takes their unyielding words directly to the Lord.
Historical & Cultural Context: The period described in 1 Samuel marks a monumental shift in ancient Israel's governmental structure. Prior to this, Israel functioned as a loose confederacy of tribes, governed by charismatic judges whom God raised up to deliver the people from various oppressions. This was fundamentally a theocratic system, where Yahweh was explicitly recognized as their sovereign King. However, the surrounding nations, such as the Philistines and Ammonites, were organized monarchies, often perceived as more stable, unified, and militarily effective. Israel's demand for a king was thus deeply rooted in a desire for conformity and perceived security, wishing to be "like all the nations" as stated in 1 Samuel 8:5. This desire, however, reflected a profound lack of faith in God's unique provision and protection, preferring a visible, human leader over the invisible, divine King. The establishment of a monarchy would fundamentally alter Israel's political, social, and religious landscape, initiating a new era that would profoundly shape their national identity and their covenant relationship with God.
Key Themes: This verse significantly contributes to several overarching themes within 1 Samuel and the broader Old Testament narrative. Firstly, it highlights the theme of divine sovereignty versus human will. While God had a perfect plan for a theocratic Israel, He ultimately permits their choice for a king, demonstrating His long-suffering patience and allowing humanity to experience the consequences of their desires. This tension is evident throughout the book, particularly as God raises up and later rejects kings like Saul, as seen in 1 Samuel 15:23. Secondly, it underscores the importance of faithful mediation and intercession. Samuel, serving as prophet, priest, and judge, stands as a crucial bridge between God and His people, even when their requests are contrary to God's ideal. His willingness to "rehearse" their words without alteration, despite his personal feelings (1 Samuel 8:6), exemplifies integrity in spiritual leadership. Finally, the passage foreshadows the complexities and challenges of human kingship. God's warnings in 1 Samuel 8:11-18 are not mere threats but prophetic insights into the future struggles, abuses of power, and spiritual failures that would plague the Israelite monarchy, ultimately leading to division and exile, a reality vividly portrayed in 2 Kings 17.
EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS
Key Word Analysis
Verse Breakdown
Literary Devices
The verse employs several significant literary devices that enrich its meaning. Anthropomorphism is strikingly evident in the phrase "in the ears of the LORD," which attributes a human physical characteristic (ears) to God. This device makes the divine accessible and relatable, emphasizing God's active engagement and attentiveness to human affairs, particularly the petitions of His people. The entire scene functions as powerful Foreshadowing, as Samuel's act of relaying the people's desire for a king sets in motion the events that will define much of Israel's future history, including the successes, failures, and ultimate trajectory of the monarchy. It subtly hints at the profound consequences of rejecting God's ideal plan. Furthermore, Samuel's role here is a quintessential example of Mediation, where he stands as an indispensable intermediary between two distinct parties: a holy God and His wayward people. His faithful reporting, even of an unpalatable truth, underscores the vital and demanding function of a prophet in bridging the divine and human realms.
THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS
1 Samuel 8:21 profoundly illustrates the enduring theological principle of bringing all matters, even those born of human folly, rebellion, or misplaced desires, before the Lord in prayer and petition. Samuel's faithful act demonstrates God's willingness to listen to His people, even when their desires are not aligned with His perfect will. It underscores the divine patience and sovereignty, revealing that while God may permit human choices, He does so with full knowledge of the consequences and often provides warnings. This passage serves as a theological anchor for understanding the nature of intercession and the profound accessibility of God to His people, inviting them into a dialogue even when their hearts are far from His ideal.
REFLECTION AND APPLICATION
Samuel's example in 1 Samuel 8:21 offers profound and enduring lessons for contemporary believers. It serves as a powerful reminder that our relationship with God is one of open, honest, and unreserved communication, where we are invited to lay bare all our desires, fears, anxieties, and even our misguided requests before Him. Just as Samuel faithfully presented the people's words without alteration or personal bias, we are called to bring our authentic selves and our genuine petitions to God, trusting implicitly in His character to hear and respond according to His perfect wisdom, boundless love, and sovereign will, even if His answer is not what we initially hoped for. This act of transparent prayer cultivates humility, fosters deep dependence on God, and leads to a more profound understanding of His sovereignty over our lives and circumstances. It also highlights our ongoing responsibility to diligently discern God's will, even when it challenges our own preferences or comforts, and to trust in His warnings as expressions of His protective care and ultimate good.
Questions for Reflection
FAQ
Why did God allow Israel to have a king if it was not His ideal plan?
Answer: God allowed Israel to have a king despite it not being His ideal theocratic rule for several profound and interconnected reasons. Firstly, it powerfully demonstrated His sovereignty and patience. While He preferred to be their direct King, He honored their persistent human will, allowing them to experience the consequences of their choices. This is a recurring theme throughout Scripture, where God permits human decisions, even when they deviate from His perfect design, ultimately using them to further His overarching redemptive plan. Secondly, it served as a pedagogical act. By allowing them a king, God permitted Israel to learn firsthand the burdens, oppressions, and potential pitfalls of human monarchy, as detailed in His stern warnings through Samuel in 1 Samuel 8:11-18. This lived experience would underscore the ultimate superiority of divine rule. Finally, and crucially, it was an integral part of God's larger redemptive narrative. Even though the human monarchy would prove flawed and lead to significant national struggles, it ultimately led to the establishment of the Davidic line, from which the Messiah, the perfect and eternal King, would ultimately come, as prophesied in 2 Samuel 7:12-16. God masterfully works through human imperfections and even rebellion to achieve His perfect, redemptive purposes.
CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT
Samuel's faithful mediation in 1 Samuel 8:21, where he stands as an intermediary between a rebellious people and a holy God, powerfully foreshadows the ultimate and perfect mediation of Jesus Christ. Samuel, as prophet, priest, and judge, served as a temporary and imperfect bridge, faithfully presenting the people's flawed desires to God. Yet, his mediation was inherently limited by his own humanity and the ongoing sinfulness of the people he represented. In stark contrast, Jesus Christ is the perfect Mediator of a new and better covenant (Hebrews 8:6). He not only "hears" our petitions but perfectly understands the human condition, having been tempted in every way, yet without sin (Hebrews 4:15). More profoundly, Christ did not merely "rehearse" our words to God; He became the very sacrifice that reconciles humanity to God, offering His own life as the perfect atonement for sin (1 Peter 3:18). He is the ultimate Prophet who perfectly reveals God's will and truth (John 1:18), the eternal Priest who intercedes for us without ceasing at the right hand of God (Hebrews 7:25), and the true King who reigns in righteousness and justice, unlike the flawed human kings Israel desired (Isaiah 9:6-7). The people's rejection of God as their direct King in 1 Samuel 8 finds its redemptive answer in Christ, who invites all to submit to His perfect and benevolent rule, providing the true security, divine leadership, and eternal peace that Israel mistakenly sought in an earthly monarch.