Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
So David and his men rose up early to depart in the morning, to return into the land of the Philistines. And the Philistines went up to Jezreel.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
So David H1732 and his men H582 rose up early H7925 to depart H3212 in the morning H1242, to return H7725 into the land H776 of the Philistines H6430. And the Philistines H6430 went up H5927 to Jezreel H3157.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
David got up early in the morning, he and his men, to leave and go back into the land of the P'lishtim; while the P'lishtim continued up to Yizre'el.
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
So David and his men got up early in the morning to return to the land of the Philistines. And the Philistines went up to Jezreel.
Ask
American Standard Version
So David rose up early, he and his men, to depart in the morning, to return into the land of the Philistines. And the Philistines went up to Jezreel.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
So David rose up early, he and his men, to depart in the morning, to return into the land of the Philistines. The Philistines went up to Jezreel.
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
So Dauid and his men rose vp earely to depart in the morning, and to returne into the lande of the Philistims: and the Philistims went vp to Izreel.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
And David riseth early, he and his men, to go in the morning, to turn back unto the land of the Philistines, and the Philistines have gone up to Jezreel.
Ask
See on the biblical-era map
Achish’s Campaign against the Israelites
Achish’s Campaign against the Israelites View full PDF

Map © Biblica Open Bible Maps · CC BY-SA 4.0

In the KJVVerse 7,979 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

1 Samuel 29:11 marks a crucial turning point in David's exile among the Philistines, depicting his prompt departure from the Philistine army's encampment. This verse highlights God's providential hand in orchestrating events to spare David from the moral dilemma of fighting against his own people, Israel, and simultaneously positions him to deal with the devastating Amalekite raid on Ziklag, a critical event preceding his ascension to the throne of Judah. It underscores how divine sovereignty can utilize human mistrust and political maneuvering to achieve its redemptive purposes.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: This verse immediately follows the intense deliberations among the Philistine lords regarding David's participation in their impending battle against Israel. Despite King Achish's trust in David, the other Philistine commanders harbored deep suspicion, fearing David would betray them in battle to reconcile with Saul. Their collective decision, articulated in 1 Samuel 29:4-5, was to send David back to the place Achish had assigned him. Verse 11 describes David's immediate compliance, effectively removing him from a direct confrontation with his own nation. This departure is narratively vital, as it sets the stage for two concurrent and pivotal events: David's return to a ransacked Ziklag in 1 Samuel 30 and the tragic Battle of Gilboa in 1 Samuel 31, where Saul and his sons perish, clearing the path for David's kingship.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: The period of 1 Samuel 29 is set against the backdrop of ongoing hostilities between Israel and the Philistines, a dominant force in the coastal plain of Canaan. The Philistines were a formidable military power, known for their advanced iron technology and well-organized army, often posing an existential threat to early Israel. Their "lords" (seranim) were the rulers of their five principal cities (Gaza, Ashkelon, Ashdod, Gath, Ekron), forming a powerful confederacy. The gathering at Aphek and the movement towards Jezreel indicate a major military campaign aimed at the heart of Israelite territory, specifically the Jezreel Valley, a strategic crossroads. David's presence among them, as a vassal of Achish, was culturally precarious; while Achish trusted him, the other lords' suspicion was rooted in the common ancient Near Eastern practice of vassal states shifting loyalties, especially in battle. David's precarious position highlights the complex political landscape and the constant threat of war that characterized the era.
  • Key Themes: 1 Samuel 29:11 powerfully illustrates the theme of Divine Providence, showcasing God's unseen hand guiding David's circumstances. What appears to be a rejection or a setback from a human perspective is, in fact, a divinely orchestrated intervention, preventing David from being forced into a morally compromising position of fighting against his own people. This highlights God's faithfulness in protecting His chosen servant from situations that would compromise his integrity or future role as king. The verse also underscores the theme of God's Sovereignty over Human Decisions, as the Philistine lords' mistrust, though seemingly an independent decision, ultimately served God's greater plan for David and Israel. Furthermore, David's "prompt obedience" in departing quickly reflects a readiness to respond to unfolding events, whether out of relief or simple efficiency, setting the stage for the next crucial phase of his journey toward the throne, as detailed in 1 Samuel 30 and 1 Samuel 31.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • Rose up early (Hebrew, shâkam', H7925): This word (H7925) signifies the act of starting early in the morning, often with a sense of promptness and diligence. In this context, it emphasizes David and his men's immediate and decisive compliance with the Philistine lords' command to depart. It suggests that David did not linger or protest, but quickly responded to the situation, possibly out of relief at being extricated from a profound moral dilemma.
  • Depart (Hebrew, yâlak', H3212): This primitive root (H3212) means "to walk" or "to go," and in this context, specifically "to depart" or "to go away." It highlights the physical act of moving away from the Philistine encampment. This departure was the direct consequence of the Philistine lords' decision, providentially removing David from the impending conflict against Israel and redirecting his path.
  • Philistines (Hebrew, Pᵉlishtîy', H6430): This term (H6430) refers to the inhabitants of Pelesheth, the Philistine coastal plain. Their presence and actions are central to the narrative, as it is their collective decision, born of suspicion, that leads to David's departure. This highlights the significant role of this powerful, often adversarial, nation in shaping the events of early Israelite history and, specifically, David's journey to kingship.

Verse Breakdown

  • "So David and his men rose up early to depart in the morning": This clause describes the immediate and decisive action taken by David and his followers. The phrase "rose up early" (Hebrew: shâkam) signifies promptness and diligence, indicating their swift compliance with the Philistine lords' command to leave the army. This rapid departure was crucial, as it prevented David from being involved in the imminent battle against his own people, Israel, a moral quandary he had desperately sought to avoid.
  • "to return into the land of the Philistines": This specifies their immediate destination. David and his men were not returning to Israelite territory but to Ziklag, the city within Philistine territory that King Achish had granted them as a base. This detail underscores their continued, albeit temporary, status as vassals of the Philistine king, even as they were being dismissed from military service. It also sets the geographical stage for the events of the following chapter.
  • "And the Philistines went up to Jezreel": This parallel clause describes the simultaneous movement of the Philistine army. While David departs south towards Ziklag, the Philistine forces advance north into the Jezreel Valley, a strategically vital plain. This movement sets the stage for their fateful confrontation with Saul's army on Mount Gilboa, which would result in the tragic deaths of Saul and his sons. The juxtaposition of David's departure and the Philistines' advance highlights the divergent paths and destinies of David and the reigning Israelite monarchy.

Literary Devices

The verse employs several significant literary devices. Juxtaposition is evident in the simultaneous but contrasting movements of David and the Philistines: David departs south towards Ziklag, while the Philistines advance north into the Jezreel Valley. This highlights their diverging destinies and the providential separation of David from the impending conflict. Foreshadowing is powerfully at play; David's removal from the battle directly precedes Saul's death, subtly hinting at the divine preparation for David's ascension to the throne. The entire narrative surrounding David's dismissal can be seen as an instance of Divine Irony or Providence, where what appears to be a rejection (the Philistine lords' mistrust and dismissal of David) is, in fact, a divine deliverance. Their human suspicion inadvertently serves God's perfect plan to protect David from a moral compromise and preserve him for his future kingship, demonstrating God's sovereign hand at work even through the decisions of His adversaries.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

1 Samuel 29:11 is a profound testament to God's meticulous and sovereign providence. It demonstrates that even in complex and morally ambiguous situations, God is actively at work behind the scenes, orchestrating events and using human decisions—even those born of suspicion or self-interest—to fulfill His ultimate purposes. David was in an impossible position, caught between loyalty to his Philistine benefactor and allegiance to his own people. God, through the Philistine lords' mistrust, delivered David from this dilemma, protecting his integrity and ensuring he would not lift his hand against the Lord's anointed or his own nation. This divine intervention highlights God's faithfulness to His promises and His unwavering commitment to guiding His chosen instruments, even when their path seems fraught with peril or rejection.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

This verse offers a powerful reminder that God's hand is often most evident when our human plans are thwarted, or when we face situations that seem to be setbacks or rejections. David's dismissal from the Philistine army, though perhaps initially disheartening or confusing, was God's perfect plan to protect him from moral compromise and position him for his true calling. For believers today, this passage encourages a deep trust in God's sovereign timing and His ability to work all things for our good, even when circumstances appear to be against us. It challenges us to recognize that what seems like a closed door might actually be God's way of redirecting us to a path of greater blessing and alignment with His will. We are called to cultivate a posture of prompt obedience and trust, knowing that God is always working, even in the unseen details, to fulfill His purposes in our lives and in the world.

Questions for Reflection

  • Can you recall a time when a "setback" or "rejection" in your life ultimately turned out to be a divine redirection or protection?
  • How does David's experience of being spared from a moral dilemma encourage you to trust God in your own difficult choices?
  • In what ways might God be working behind the scenes in your current circumstances, even if you don't fully understand His purpose yet?
  • What does "prompt obedience" look like in your life when God's will becomes clear, even if it's unexpected?

FAQ

Why were the Philistine lords so insistent on David's departure, despite Achish's trust?

Answer: The Philistine lords' insistence on David's departure stemmed from deep-seated suspicion and practical military concerns, overriding King Achish's personal trust in David. They argued that David, a former commander in Saul's army and a renowned warrior of Israel, could not be trusted in a battle against his own people. Their concern was articulated in 1 Samuel 29:4, where they explicitly stated, "For with what should he reconcile himself unto his master? should it not be with the heads of these men?" They feared David would turn against them during the battle to regain favor with Saul, potentially leading to a catastrophic betrayal from within their ranks. From their perspective, David was an unreliable foreign element whose presence posed an unacceptable risk to their military cohesion and success. This practical mistrust, though human in origin, served as the divine mechanism to remove David from a morally impossible situation and preserve him for his future role as king of Israel.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

1 Samuel 29:11, while depicting David's providential deliverance, ultimately points to the greater deliverance and perfect obedience found in Jesus Christ. David was spared from a compromising battle by the mistrust of others, an act of God's unseen hand. Christ, however, was not spared from the ultimate battle against sin and death; instead, He willingly entered it. Unlike David, who was prevented from fighting against his own people, Jesus, the true Son of David, deliberately came to reconcile His people to God, even though it meant facing the full wrath of God for their sin. His journey to the cross, though seemingly a rejection by the world, was the ultimate act of divine providence, perfectly orchestrated to achieve redemption (Acts 2:23). Where David was protected from a moral dilemma, Christ perfectly fulfilled all righteousness, never compromising His integrity or mission (Hebrews 4:15). The "land of the Philistines" represents a place of temporary refuge and moral ambiguity for David, but Christ's "departure" was from heaven to earth, and then from earth to the cross, to secure an eternal home for His people (John 14:2-3). Thus, David's deliverance foreshadows the perfect and complete salvation accomplished by the Lamb of God, who takes away the sin of the world!, not by being removed from conflict, but by conquering it through His sacrificial death and glorious resurrection.

Copy as

Commentary on 1 Samuel 29 verses 6–11

If the reasons Achish had to trust David were stronger than the reasons which the princes offered why they should distrust him (as I do not see that, in policy, they were, for the princes were certainly in the right), yet Achish was but one of five, though the chief, and the only one that had the title of king; accordingly, in a council of war held on this occasion, he was over-voted, and obliged to dismiss David, though he was extremely fond of him. Kings cannot always do as they would, nor have such as they would about them.

I. The discharge Achish gives him is very honourable, and not a final discharge, but only from the present service. 1. He signifies the great pleasure and satisfaction he had taken in him and in his conversation: Thou art good in my sight as an angel of God, Sa1 29:9. Wise and good men will gain respect, wherever they go, from all that know how to make a right estimate of persons and things, though of different professions in religion. What Achish says of David, God, by the prophet, says of the house of David (Zac 12:8), that it shall be as the angel of the Lord. But the former is a court-compliment; the latter is a divine promise. 2. He gives him a testimonial of his good behaviour, Sa1 29:6. It is very full and in obliging terms: "Thou hast been upright, and thy whole conduct has been good in my sight, and I have not found evil in thee." Saul would not have given him such a testimonial, though he had done far more service to him than Achish. God's people should behave themselves always so inoffensively as if possible to get the good word of all they have dealings with; and it is a debt we owe to those who have acquitted themselves well to give them the praise of it. 3. He lays all the blame of his dismission upon the princes, who would by no means suffer him to continue in the camp. "The king loves thee entirely, and would venture his life in thy hand; but the lords favour thee not, and we must not disoblige them, nor can we oppose them; therefore return and go in peace." He had better part with his favourite than occasion a disgust among his generals and a mutiny in his army. Achish intimates a reason why they were uneasy. It was not so much for David's own sake as for the sake of his soldiers that attended him, whom he calls his master's servants (namely, Saul's), Sa1 29:10. They could trust him, but not them. (4.) He orders him to be gone early, as soon as it was light (Sa1 29:10), to prevent their further resentments, and the jealousies they would have been apt to conceive if he had lingered.

II. His reception of this discourse is very complimental; but, I fear, not without some degree of dissimulation. "What?" says David, "must I leave my lord the king, whom I am bound by office to protect, just now when he is going to expose himself in the field? Why may not I go and fight against the enemies of my lord the king?" Sa1 29:8. He seemed anxious to serve him when he was at this juncture really anxious to leave him, but he was not willing that Achish should know that he was. No one knows how strong the temptation is to compliment and dissemble which those are in that attend great men, and how hard it is to avoid it.

III. God's providence ordered it wisely and graciously for him. For, besides that the snare was broken and he was delivered out of the dilemma to which he was first reduced, it proved a happy hastening of him to the relief of his own city, which sorely wanted him, though he did not know it. Thus the disgrace which the lords of the Philistines put upon him prove, in more ways than one, an advantage to him. The steps of a good man ore ordered by the Lord, and he delighteth in his way. What he does with us we know not now, but we shall know hereafter, and shall see it was all for good.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 6–11. Public domain.
Copy as
BedeAD 735
Commentary on Samuel
The Philistines had gone up to Jezreel. When David departed with his men, the Philistines went up to Jezreel, that is, to combat in the seed of God, where they had previously assembled in Aphek, that is, in the new wrath. And the reprobates often, having driven away the stronger doctors of the Church from their proximity, exert all their strength to corrupt the weaker ones, whom, out of respect or fear of the former, although raging in spirit, they had previously not presumed to touch and disturb. Not only those who carry arms or argue against the good, but also those who, presenting examples of depravity under the name of brothers, display them to the sight of the pious, ascending into Jezreel, that is, the seed of God, try to infect it with the tares of diabolic seed. We see and hear that the mysteries of this reading are being fulfilled even today in many places, driving the Lord from the hearts of many, and oppressing His chosen ones; but with the approach of the world's end, with the heaps of evils growing, we do not doubt in trembling fear that they must be fulfilled more and more.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying 1 Samuel 29:11 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.