TRV
See on the biblical-era map
Study This Verse
Public-domain commentary
Matthew Henry
From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry comments on passages, not single verses — this entry covers 1 Samuel 13:8–14. His three-level outline is real structure in the source text, so it is rendered as structure.
Here is, I. Saul's offence in offering sacrifice before Samuel came. Samuel, when he anointed him, had ordered him to tarry for him seven days in Gilgal, promising that, at the end of those days, he would be sure to come to him, and both offer sacrifices for him and direct him what he should do. This we had Sa1 10:8. Perhaps that order, though inserted there, was given him afterwards, or was given him as a general rule to be observed in every public congress at Gilgal, or, as is most probable, though not mentioned again, was lately repeated with reference to this particular occasion; for it is plain that Saul himself understood it as obliging him from God now to stay till Samuel came, else he would not have made so many excuses as he did for not staying, Sa1 13:11. This order Saul broke. He staid till the seventh day, yet had not patience to wait till the end of the seventh day. Perhaps he began to reproach Samuel as false to his word, careless of his country, and disrespectful of his prince, and thought it more fit that Samuel should wait for him than he for Samuel. However, 1. He presumed to offer sacrifice without Samuel, and nothing appears to the contrary but that he did it himself, though he was neither priest nor prophet, as if, because he was a king, he might do any thing, a piece of presumption which king Uzziah paid dearly for, Ch2 26:16, etc. 2. He determined to engage the Philistines without Samuel's directions, though he had promised to show him what he should do. So self-sufficient Saul was that he thought it not worth while to stay for a prophet of the Lord, either to pray for him or to advise him. This was Saul's offence, and that which aggravated it was, (1.) That for aught that appears, he did not send any messenger to Samuel, to know his mind, to represent the case to him, and to receive fresh directions from him, though he had enough about him that were swift enough of foot at this time. (2.) That when Samuel came he rather seemed to boast of what he had done than to repent of it; for he went forth to salute him, as his brother-sacrificer, and seemed pleased with the opportunity he had of letting Samuel know that he needed him not, but could do well enough without him. He went out to bless him, so the word is, as if he now thought himself a complete priest, empowered to bless as well as sacrifice, whereas he should have gone out to be blessed by him. (3.) That he charged Samuel with breach of promise: Thou camest not within the days appointed (Sa1 13:11), and therefore if any thing was amiss Samuel must bear the blame, who was God's minister; whereas he did come according to his word, before the seven days had expired. Thus the scoffers of the latter days think the promise of Christ's coming is broken, because he does not come in their time, though it is certain he will come at the set time. (4.) That when he was charged with disobedience he justified himself in what he had done, and gave no sign at all of repentance for it. It is not sinning that ruins men, but sinning and not repenting, falling and not getting up again. See what excuses he made, Sa1 13:11, Sa1 13:12. He would have this act of disobedience pass, [1.] For an instance of his prudence. The people were most of them scattered from him, and he had no other way than this to keep those with him that remained and to prevent their deserting too. If Samuel neglected the public concerns, he would not. [2.] For an instance of his piety. He would be thought very devout, and in great care not to engage the Philistines till he had by prayer and sacrifice engaged God on his side: "The Philistines," said he, "will come down upon me, before I have made my supplication to the Lord, and then I am undone. What! go to war before I have said my prayers!" Thus he covered his disobedience to God's command with a pretence of concern for God's favour. Hypocrites lay a great stress upon the external performances of religion, thinking thereby to excuse their neglect of the weightier matters of the law. And yet, lastly, He owns it went against his conscience to do it: I forced myself and offered a burnt-offering, perhaps boasting that he had broken through his convictions and got the better of them, or at least thinking this extenuated his fault, that he knew he should not have done as he did, but did it with reluctancy. Foolish man! to think that God would be well pleased with sacrifices offered in direct opposition both to his general and particular command.
II.The sentence passed upon Saul for this offence.
Samuel found him standing by his burnt-offering, but, instead of an answer of peace, was sent to him with heavy tidings, and let him know that the sacrifice of the wicked is abomination to the Lord, much more when he brings it, as Saul did, with a wicked mind.
1.He shows him the aggravations of his crime, and says to this king, Thou art wicked, which it is not for any but a prophet of the Lord to say, Job 34:18. He charges him with being an enemy to himself and his interest - Thou hast done foolishly, and a rebel to God and his government - "Thou hast not kept the commandment of the Lord thy God, that commandment wherewith he intended to try thy obedience." Note, Those that disobey the commandments of God do foolishly for themselves. Sin is folly, and sinners are the greatest fools.
2.He reads his doom (Sa1 13:14): "Thy kingdom shall not continue long to thee or thy family; God has his eye upon another, a man after his own heart, and not like thee, that will have thy own will and way." The sentence is in effect the same with Mene tekel, only now there seems room left for Saul's repentance, upon which this sentence would have been reversed; but, upon the next act of disobedience, it was made irreversible, Sa1 15:29. And now, better a thousand times he had continued in obscurity tending his asses than to be enthroned and so soon dethroned. But was not this hard, to pass so severe a sentence upon him and his house for a single error, an error that seemed so small, and in excuse for which he had so much to say? No, The Lord is righteous in all his ways and does no man any wrong, will be justified when he speaks and clear when he judges. By this,
(1.)He shows that there is no sin little, because no little god to sin against; but that every sin is a forfeiture of the heavenly kingdom, for which we stood fair.
(2.)He shows that disobedience to an express command, though in a small matter, is a great provocation, as in the case of our first parents.
(3.)He warns us to take heed of our spirits, for that which to men may seem but a small offence, yet to him that knows from what principle and with what disposition of mind it is done, may appear a heinous crime.
(4.)God, in rejecting Saul for an error seemingly little, sets off, as by a foil, the lustre of his mercy in forgiving such great sins as those of David, Manasseh, and others.
(5.)We are taught hereby how necessary it is that we wait on our God continually. Saul lost his kingdom for want of two or three hours' patience.
Continue studying 1 Samuel 13:10 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
SefariaThe Hebrew text with Rashi and centuries of Jewish commentary.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
Summary
1 Samuel 13:10 marks the dramatic and divinely orchestrated arrival of the prophet Samuel precisely as King Saul concludes an unauthorized burnt offering. This pivotal moment immediately follows Saul's impatient decision to usurp priestly duties, driven by the intense pressure of the Philistine threat and the scattering of his army. The verse underscores Saul's profound disobedience and lack of faith, setting the stage for Samuel's pronouncement of divine judgment and signaling a critical turning point that reveals Saul's unsuitability for enduring kingship due to his failure to trust and obey God's specific commands.
Context
Literary Context
This verse is deeply embedded within the narrative of Saul's early kingship, specifically following his anointing and initial victories. The preceding verses (1 Samuel 13:1-9) detail the immense pressure Saul faced from the formidable Philistine army at Michmash. Saul was at Gilgal, a significant spiritual and historical site for Israel, waiting for Samuel to come and offer sacrifices before engaging in battle, as explicitly commanded by Samuel in 1 Samuel 10:8. As the appointed seven days drew to a close, and with his army scattering due to fear and the prophet's apparent delay, Saul took it upon himself to offer the burnt offering. Verse 10 immediately follows this presumptuous act, presenting Samuel's sudden appearance, which serves as a divine punctuation mark on Saul's transgression and directly leads to the prophet's rebuke and the pronouncement of God's rejection of Saul's dynasty in 1 Samuel 13:13-14.
Historical & Cultural Context
The period of Saul's reign was a transitional era for Israel, moving from a tribal confederacy led by judges to a centralized monarchy. The Philistines were a formidable and constant threat, technologically superior with iron weaponry, while Israel largely possessed bronze. This military disparity created significant tension and pressure on Israel's leadership. Sacrifices, particularly burnt offerings ('olah), were central to Israelite worship, symbolizing complete devotion and atonement, and were strictly reserved for priests or prophets acting under divine instruction. Kings, while holding political authority, were not permitted to usurp priestly functions. Saul's act was not merely a ceremonial error but a profound challenge to the divinely established order, a display of impatience, and a lack of faith in God's timing and provision, especially in a time of national crisis. Gilgal itself held historical significance as the first encampment of Israel after crossing the Jordan, a place of covenant renewal and spiritual significance (Joshua 5:9-10).
Key Themes
1 Samuel 13:10 powerfully illustrates several core themes prevalent in the book of 1 Samuel and the broader Old Testament. Firstly, it highlights the critical importance of obedience over sacrifice, a theme explicitly articulated later in 1 Samuel 15:22, where Samuel declares that "to obey is better than sacrifice, and to hearken than the fat of rams." Saul's act demonstrates a failure to trust God's timing and a reliance on human expediency, emphasizing the theme of divine timing and human impatience. Secondly, the verse underscores the boundaries of authority established by God; Saul, as king, overstepped his divinely appointed role by presuming priestly functions, revealing a dangerous blend of presumption and a lack of submission to God's ordained structure. Finally, this moment serves as a stark example of consequences for disobedience, as Samuel's immediate arrival and subsequent rebuke foreshadow the eventual rejection of Saul's dynasty, paving the way for the anointing of David, a man after God's own heart (1 Samuel 13:14).
Exposition and Analysis
Key Word Analysis
This verb (H3615) signifies completion, termination, or finishing. Its use here emphasizes the precise timing of Samuel's arrival – not during the offering, but immediately after its conclusion. This highlights the divine orchestration of events, ensuring that Saul's act was fully committed before the confrontation, leaving no room for excuses or interruption. It underscores the finality and culpability of Saul's transgressive act.
This term (H5930) refers to a specific type of sacrifice in ancient Israel where the entire animal was consumed by fire on the altar, symbolizing complete dedication, atonement, and devotion to God. For Saul to offer the ʻôlâh was a usurpation of a priestly function, an act of profound spiritual significance that was strictly regulated. His unauthorized performance of this sacred ritual rendered it an act of rebellion rather than worship, demonstrating a disregard for God's established order and the sanctity of divine worship.
While commonly translated as "salute" or "bless," the verb bârak (H1288) here suggests a formal greeting or an attempt to show respect. Saul's action of going out to meet Samuel and "salute him" immediately after his transgression is telling. It could imply a superficial attempt to maintain decorum, to present an image of innocence, or even to preempt Samuel's potential anger with a show of deference. However, given the gravity of his disobedience, this gesture appears hollow, failing to mask the deeper issue of his heart's rebellion and lack of genuine repentance.
Verse Breakdown
"And it came to pass, that as soon as he had made an end of offering the burnt offering,"
This opening clause establishes the dramatic timing of the narrative. The phrase "as soon as" (כְּהַכְּלֹתוֹ, k'hakkeloto) emphasizes the immediate, almost instantaneous, sequence of events. Saul's unauthorized act of offering the burnt offering is completed, leaving no ambiguity about his full commitment to the transgression. This precision highlights divine omniscience and the exact moment of accountability, underscoring that Saul fully executed his disobedient act.
"behold, Samuel came;"
The interjection "behold" (וְהִנֵּה, v'hinneh) introduces a sudden and significant event, creating a sense of dramatic tension and divine intervention. Samuel's arrival is not coincidental but divinely timed, serving as the immediate consequence and confrontation for Saul's disobedience. It underscores God's perfect timing and His awareness of human actions, even those performed under duress, demonstrating that no act of rebellion goes unnoticed by the sovereign Lord.
"and Saul went out to meet him, that he might salute him."
Saul's reaction is to go out and greet Samuel. This action could be interpreted in several ways: a genuine attempt to explain himself, a feigned display of respect to mitigate the prophet's anger, or a desperate effort to maintain an appearance of normalcy after his profound error. Regardless of his intent, the act of "saluting" Samuel (greeting him formally) stands in stark contrast to the gravity of his preceding disobedience, setting the stage for the inevitable confrontation and judgment that immediately follows in the narrative.
Literary Devices
The narrative in 1 Samuel 13:10 masterfully employs several literary devices to heighten its impact. The most prominent is Irony, as Samuel, whom Saul was impatiently waiting for, arrives precisely at the moment Saul finishes the very act he was forbidden to perform. This creates a powerful ironic twist, emphasizing Saul's lack of faith and God's perfect, albeit delayed, timing. There is also significant Juxtaposition between Saul's unauthorized, presumptuous act and Samuel's divinely appointed, authoritative presence. This immediate contrast highlights the two opposing forces at play: human will versus divine command. The suddenness of Samuel's appearance, marked by the interjection "behold," generates considerable Dramatic Tension, building anticipation for the impending confrontation and the consequences of Saul's actions. Furthermore, this verse serves as a crucial point of Foreshadowing, hinting at the eventual rejection of Saul as king and the transfer of the kingdom, which Samuel explicitly pronounces in the subsequent verses.
Theological and Thematic Connections
1 Samuel 13:10 serves as a profound theological statement on the nature of obedience, authority, and divine timing. Saul's impatience and subsequent usurpation of priestly authority reveal a fundamental misunderstanding of his role as king under God's sovereignty. He prioritized immediate expediency and human fear over faithful adherence to God's explicit command, demonstrating a heart that was not fully submitted to the Lord. This incident underscores that God values obedience and trust more than ritualistic performance or human initiative, especially when such initiative contravenes divine instruction. It highlights that true leadership, particularly in God's kingdom, is characterized by humble submission to His will and patient reliance on His perfect timing, rather than self-reliant action driven by perceived necessity.
Reflection and Application
The narrative of 1 Samuel 13:10 offers profound lessons for contemporary believers, challenging us to examine the posture of our hearts in times of pressure and uncertainty. Like Saul, we often face situations where waiting on God seems impractical, where human solutions appear more immediate and effective, or where the temptation to overstep our boundaries feels justified by perceived necessity. This verse reminds us that true faith is demonstrated not by our ability to perform religious acts, but by our unwavering obedience to God's specific commands and our patient trust in His perfect timing, even when circumstances seem dire or His presence feels delayed. It calls us to cultivate a spirit of humility, recognizing that God's ways are higher than our ways, and His timing is always perfect. Our role is to remain faithful to our assigned responsibilities, trusting that He will fulfill His promises in His own time and manner, for His glory and our good.
Questions for Reflection
FAQ
Why was Saul's offering of the burnt offering considered such a grave sin, given the pressure he was under?
Saul's act was a grave sin for several reasons, despite the immense pressure from the Philistines and the scattering of his army. Firstly, it was a direct act of disobedience to Samuel's explicit command to wait seven days for the prophet to arrive and offer the sacrifices (1 Samuel 10:8). Saul's impatience led him to prioritize human expediency over divine instruction. Secondly, and critically, it was an usurpation of priestly authority. In Israel, offering sacrifices was a sacred duty reserved for priests (from the line of Aaron) or prophets acting under direct divine mandate. Kings had political and military authority, but not priestly. By performing the burnt offering himself, Saul blurred the lines between kingly and priestly roles, challenging the divinely established order. This was not merely a ceremonial error but a profound act of rebellion against God's ordained structure and a demonstration of his lack of faith in God's ability to deliver Israel in His own time and way.
Christ-Centered Fulfillment
The narrative of Saul's disobedience in 1 Samuel 13:10 provides a stark contrast that powerfully illuminates the perfect obedience and ultimate priesthood of Jesus Christ. Saul, the first king of Israel, failed under pressure, presuming a role not his own and demonstrating a profound lack of trust in God's timing. His act of offering a burnt offering, though perhaps intended to secure God's favor, was ultimately an act of rebellion that led to the rejection of his dynasty. In profound contrast, Jesus, the true King of Israel and the Son of God, perfectly fulfilled all righteousness through His unwavering obedience. He did not usurp authority but humbly submitted to His Father's will, even to the point of death on a cross (Philippians 2:8). Unlike Saul's flawed and unauthorized sacrifice, Christ offered Himself as the perfect, once-for-all burnt offering, the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world, a sacrifice that truly atones and brings reconciliation (Hebrews 9:11-14). Furthermore, Jesus is our eternal High Priest, who mediates for us not by a temporary ritual but by His own blood, having entered the true heavenly sanctuary (Hebrews 4:14-16 and Hebrews 7:27). Where Saul failed in impatient disobedience, Christ succeeded in perfect, trusting submission, establishing an eternal kingdom founded on His flawless righteousness and ultimate sacrifice.