Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
And it came to pass, when he began to reign, as soon as he sat on his throne, that he slew all the house of Baasha: he left him not one that pisseth against a wall, neither of his kinsfolks, nor of his friends.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
And it came to pass, when he began to reign H4427, as soon as he sat H3427 on his throne H3678, that he slew H5221 all the house H1004 of Baasha H1201: he left H7604 him not one that pisseth H8366 against a wall H7023, neither of his kinsfolks H1350, nor of his friends H7453.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
At the beginning of his reign, as soon as he took over the throne, he killed off the entire house of Ba'sha; he left not a single male, neither of his relatives nor of his friends.
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
As soon as Zimri began to reign and was seated on the throne, he struck down the entire household of Baasha. He did not leave a single male, whether a kinsman or friend.
Ask
American Standard Version
And it came to pass, when he began to reign, as soon as he sat on his throne, that he smote all the house of Baasha: he left him not a single man-child, neither of his kinsfolks, nor of his friends.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
When he began to reign, as soon as he sat on his throne, he struck all the house of Baasha: he didn’t leave him a single one who urinates on a wall, neither of his relatives, nor of his friends.
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
And when he was King, and sate on his throne, he slew al the house of Baasha, not leauing thereof one to pisse against a wall, neither of his kinsfolkes nor of his friendes.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
and it cometh to pass in his reigning, at his sitting on his throne, he hath smitten the whole house of Baasha; he hath not left to him any sitting on the wall, and of his redeemers, and of his friends.
Ask
See on the biblical-era map
City Plan: Jerusalem in the Time of Solomon
City Plan: Jerusalem in the Time of Solomon View full PDF
Baasha, Zimri, and Omri
Baasha, Zimri, and Omri View full PDF
Ahab and Ben-Hadad
Ahab and Ben-Hadad View full PDF

Map © Biblica Open Bible Maps · CC BY-SA 4.0

In the KJVVerse 9,295 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

1 Kings 16:11 chronicles the brutal and immediate consolidation of power by Zimri, a chariot commander, who, upon seizing the throne of the Northern Kingdom of Israel, ruthlessly exterminated the entire royal household of the preceding king, Baasha. This swift and comprehensive purge, extending to all male descendants and even loyal associates, was a calculated act to eliminate any potential rivals and was simultaneously a precise fulfillment of the divine judgment previously pronounced against Baasha's idolatrous dynasty.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: This verse is strategically placed within a tumultuous section of 1 Kings 15-16, which details a rapid succession of kings in the Northern Kingdom of Israel, each often gaining power through violence and perpetuating the sins of their predecessors. Specifically, 1 Kings 16:11 follows the prophetic denunciation of Baasha's house by Jehu, son of Hanani, in 1 Kings 16:1-7, which foretold the very destruction Zimri enacts. Baasha himself had seized the throne by assassinating Nadab, Jeroboam's son, and eradicating Jeroboam's house (1 Kings 15:27-30). Zimri, a captain of chariots, then assassinated Baasha's son and successor, Elah, while Elah was intoxicated (1 Kings 16:9-10). The immediate aftermath of Zimri's purge is his own incredibly brief seven-day reign, ending in his self-immolation as Omri besieges Tirzah (1 Kings 16:15-20), highlighting the volatile and divinely orchestrated nature of this period.

  • Historical & Cultural Context: The practice of eliminating an entire dynastic line upon a change of power, known as "damnatio memoriae" or a "purge," was a common and brutal reality in the ancient Near East. This act was not merely vengeful but a strategic political maneuver designed to prevent any future claims to the throne by surviving family members, loyalists, or even distant relatives, thereby completely securing the new ruler's position and preventing counter-coups. The Northern Kingdom of Israel, unlike the more stable Davidic dynasty in Judah, was characterized by profound political instability, marked by frequent assassinations, coups, and short-lived reigns. This chronic instability was often directly linked to the kings' persistent idolatry, particularly the worship of the golden calves established by Jeroboam (1 Kings 12:28-30), which consistently provoked the Lord's anger and led to cycles of divine judgment and violent overthrow.

  • Key Themes: The extermination of Baasha's house in 1 Kings 16:11 powerfully illustrates several recurring themes prevalent throughout the book of 1 Kings. Firstly, it underscores the theme of Divine Judgment and Retribution, demonstrating God's active sovereignty over human affairs and His unwavering justice against unrighteousness, especially the pervasive sin of idolatry. The destruction is explicitly presented as a precise fulfillment of God's declared word through His prophet, not merely a random act of human cruelty. Secondly, it exemplifies the Cycle of Violence and Usurpation, a tragic pattern in the Northern Kingdom where kings seize power through bloodshed, only to have their own dynasties overthrown by similar means, highlighting the moral decay and political instability that result from rebellion against God. Finally, the event serves as a stark reminder of the Fulfillment of Prophecy, emphasizing the certainty of God's word coming to pass, often utilizing human agents—even wicked ones—to achieve His sovereign purposes.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • slew (Hebrew, nâkâh', H5221): This verb (H5221) signifies a decisive and often violent strike, a fatal blow, or a slaughter. In this context, it emphasizes the intentional and complete destruction of Baasha's household, indicating not merely a defeat in battle but a deliberate act of annihilation, a systematic execution of the entire lineage.
  • house (Hebrew, bayith', H1004): This term (H1004) refers to more than just the immediate family; it encompasses the entire dynastic lineage, including all male descendants, close relatives, and even significant officials or loyal supporters associated with the former king. Its eradication signifies the complete dismantling of the previous regime's power base and any potential for resurgence.
  • pisseth (Hebrew, shâthan', H8366): This primitive root (H8366) means "to make water" or "to urinate." When used in the idiom "pisseth against a wall," it is a crude but vivid and highly effective expression denoting any male, from an infant to an adult. Its inclusion emphasizes the utter and total extermination of all males in the lineage, ensuring no one remained who could potentially challenge the new king's authority or carry on the former dynasty. It underscores the ruthlessness and totality of the purge.

Verse Breakdown

  • "And it came to pass, when he began to reign, as soon as he sat on his throne": This opening clause highlights the immediate and decisive nature of Zimri's actions. The purge was initiated instantly upon his seizure of royal authority, underscoring his ruthlessness and strategic intent to eliminate all potential threats to his newly acquired power without delay.
  • "[that] he slew all the house of Baasha": This is the central action of the verse, detailing the complete and comprehensive eradication of the former king's entire family and associated lineage. This act was a common, albeit horrific, method of dynastic consolidation in the ancient Near East, aimed at preventing future challenges to the throne by removing all potential heirs or claimants.
  • "he left him not one that pisseth against a wall, neither of his kinsfolks, nor of his friends.": This final, graphic clause underscores the absolute totality of the purge. The idiom "pisseth against a wall" signifies the extermination of every single male, from the youngest to the oldest. The explicit addition of "neither of his kinsfolks, nor of his friends" further emphasizes the comprehensive nature of the slaughter, extending beyond direct lineage to include any loyal supporters or associates, ensuring no one remained who could harbor allegiance to the former regime or mount a counter-coup.

Literary Devices

The narrative in 1 Kings 16:11 employs several powerful literary devices to convey its message. Irony is profoundly present, as Zimri, the agent of God's judgment against Baasha's house, himself experiences the shortest reign in Israelite history, lasting only seven days. This swift rise and fall underscore the fleeting nature of human power and the ultimate sovereignty of God, who can use even wicked individuals to accomplish His purposes before swiftly bringing judgment upon them. The crude but effective idiom "pisseth against a wall" serves as a vivid and almost hyperbolic expression to convey the complete and utter extermination of all males, leaving no potential heir or challenger. This graphic language emphasizes the ruthlessness and totality of the purge. Furthermore, the recurring pattern of violent usurpation and divine judgment throughout 1 Kings, with Baasha overthrowing Jeroboam's house and Zimri overthrowing Baasha's, creates a strong sense of cyclical narrative and foreshadowing, where the fate of one king often mirrors that of his predecessor, highlighting the inevitable consequences of persistent sin and rebellion against God.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

The brutal events of 1 Kings 16:11, while deeply unsettling in their depiction of human cruelty, serve as a stark testament to God's unwavering justice and His active involvement in the affairs of humanity. This passage reveals that even in the midst of political intrigue and violent power struggles, God remains sovereign, working out His purposes and fulfilling His prophetic word. The extermination of Baasha's house is presented not as mere happenstance but as a direct consequence of his persistent idolatry and disobedience, underscoring the severe repercussions of turning away from the Lord. It demonstrates that God holds kings and nations accountable for their actions, and His judgments, though sometimes executed through human agents, are always righteous and certain, ensuring that no sin goes unaddressed in His divine economy.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

While the specific context of 1 Kings 16:11 is rooted in ancient Israelite kingship, its underlying principles offer profound and timeless insights for believers today. This passage confronts us with the sobering reality of God's righteous judgment against sin, particularly the sin of idolatry and persistent rebellion against His commands. It reminds us that no earthly power, no matter how absolute or ruthlessly consolidated, is beyond God's sovereign control or His ultimate judgment. The fleeting reigns and violent ends of kings like Baasha and Zimri serve as a sobering reminder of the temporary nature of human glory and the futility of building kingdoms apart from God. This should prompt us to examine our own lives, ensuring that our loyalties are firmly rooted in God alone, rather than in transient earthly pursuits, misplaced allegiances, or the idols of our age. It calls us to trust in God's perfect justice, even when human events seem chaotic or unjust, knowing that He is always working out His purposes, and that true, lasting security and peace are found only in Him.

Questions for Reflection

  • How does this passage challenge our understanding of God's justice and sovereignty in the face of human evil and political violence?
  • What "idols" or misplaced loyalties in our own lives might invite God's disciplinary hand or lead to spiritual instability?
  • In what ways does the fleeting nature of earthly power, as seen in Zimri's brief reign, encourage us to seek lasting spiritual realities and invest in God's eternal kingdom?

FAQ

Why is such a violent act described in the Bible?

Answer: The Bible, as a historical and theological record, accurately portrays the harsh realities of ancient Near Eastern politics and warfare. This particular act of extermination is not presented as condoned by God in a moral sense, but rather as the precise fulfillment of His prophetic judgment against Baasha's house for their persistent idolatry, wickedness, and failure to turn from the sins of Jeroboam. It serves to demonstrate God's sovereignty over human affairs, His justice against unrighteousness, and the severe consequences of rebellion against Him. It also highlights the moral decay and political instability prevalent in the Northern Kingdom of Israel, a direct result of their spiritual apostasy, as seen in the repeated cycles of judgment throughout 1 Kings.

What does "pisseth against a wall" mean?

Answer: This is a graphic and crude Hebrew idiom used to refer to any male, from the youngest child to the oldest man. Its inclusion in the text signifies a complete and utter extermination of all males in the lineage, leaving no one who could potentially challenge the new king's authority or carry on the former dynasty. It emphasizes the ruthlessness and totality of the purge, ensuring no male survivor remained to threaten Zimri's reign. Similar phrases appear in other Old Testament passages to denote total destruction of a male lineage, such as in 1 Samuel 25:22 and 2 Kings 9:8.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

The relentless cycle of violence, usurpation, and divine judgment depicted in 1 Kings 16:11 and throughout the history of Israel's kings ultimately points to the profound need for a different kind of king and a different kind of kingdom. The temporary, flawed, and often brutal reigns of earthly monarchs like Zimri, who consolidate power through bloodshed, stand in stark contrast to the eternal, peaceful, and righteous reign of Jesus Christ. While God's judgment on Baasha's house was severe and just, it foreshadows a greater, ultimate judgment where all sin will be perfectly addressed, as described in passages like Matthew 25:31-46 and Revelation 20:11-15. However, unlike the kings of Israel who brought only temporary and often violent solutions, Christ offers not just judgment but also deliverance and reconciliation. He is the true King who, through His own perfect sacrifice on the cross, takes away the sin of the world (John 1:29), offering forgiveness and eternal life to all who believe. His kingdom is not established by the slaying of enemies but by His own self-giving love, and it is an unshakable kingdom (Hebrews 12:28), one that will never be overthrown or suffer the fleeting fate of earthly dynasties (Colossians 1:13-14). Thus, the instability and judgment seen in 1 Kings 16:11 ultimately magnify the glory and necessity of Christ's perfect and everlasting reign, offering true hope and security.

Copy as

Commentary on 1 Kings 16 verses 1–14

I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points(1.) (2.) Details

Here is, I. The ruin of the family of Baasha foretold. He was a man likely enough to have raised and established his family - active, politic, and daring; but he was an idolater, and this brought destruction upon his family.

1.God sent him warning of it before. (1.) That, if he were thereby wrought upon to repent and reform, the ruin might be prevented; for God threatens, that he may not strike, as one that desires not the death of sinners. (2.) That, if not, it might appear that the destruction when it did come, whoever might be instruments of it, was the act of God's justice and the punishment of sin.

2.The warning was sent by Jehu the son of Hanani. The father was a seer, or prophet, at the same time (Ch2 16:7), and was sent to Asa king of Judah; but the son, who was young and more active, was sent on this longer and more dangerous expedition to Baasha king of Israel. Juniores ad labores - Toil and adventure are for the young. This Jehu was a prophet and the son of a prophet. Prophecy, thus happily entailed, was worthy of so much the more honour. This Jehu continued long in his usefulness, for we find him reproving Jehoshaphat (Ch2 19:2) above forty years after, and writing the annals of that prince, Ch2 20:34. The message which this prophet brought to Baasha is much the same with that which Ahijah sent to Jeroboam by his wife.

(1.)He reminds Baasha of the great things God had done for him (Kg1 16:2): I exalted thee out of the dust to the throne of glory, a great instance of the divine sovereignty and power, Sa1 2:8. Baasha seemed to have raised himself by his own treachery and cruelty, yet there was a hand of Providence in it, to bring about God's counsel, concerning Jeroboam's house; and God's owning his advancement as his act and deed does by no means amount to the patronising of his ambition and treachery. It is God that puts power into bad men's hands, which he makes to serve his good purposes, notwithstanding the bad use they make of it. I made thee prince over my people. God calls Israel his people still, though wretchedly corrupted, because they retained the covenant of circumcision, and there were many good people among them; it was not till long after that they were called Loammi, not a people, Hos 1:9.

(2.)He charges him with high crimes and misdemeanours, [1.] That he had caused Israel to sin, had seduced God's subjects from their allegiance and brought them to pay to dunghill-deities the homage due to him only, and herein he had walked in the way of Jeroboam (Kg1 16:2), and been like his house, Kg1 16:7. [2.] That he had himself provoked God to anger with the work of his hands, that is, by worshipping images, the work of men's hands; though perhaps others made them, yet he served them and thereby avowed the making of them, and they are therefore called the work of his hands. [3.] That he had destroyed the house of Jeroboam (Kg1 16:7), because he killed him, namely, Jeroboam's son and all his: if he had done that with an eye to God, to his will and glory, and from a holy indignation against the sins of Jeroboam and his house, he would have been accepted and applauded as a minister of God's justice; but, as he did it, he was only the tool of God's justice, but a servant to his own lusts, and is justly punished for the malice and ambition which actuated and governed him in all he did. Note, Those who are in any way employed in denouncing or executing the justice of God (magistrates or ministers) are concerned to do it from a good principle and in a holy manner, lest it turn into sin to them and they make themselves obnoxious by it.

(3.)He foretels the same destruction to come upon his family which he himself had been employed to bring upon the family of Jeroboam, Kg1 16:3, Kg1 16:4. Note, Those who resemble others in their sins may expect to resemble them in their plagues, especially those who seem zealous against such sins in others as they allow themselves in; the house of Jehu was reckoned with for the blood of the house of Ahab, Hos 1:4.

II. A reprieve granted for some time, so long that Baasha himself dies in peace, and is buried with honour in his own royal city (Kg1 16:6), so far is he from being a prey either to the dogs or to the fowls, which yet was threatened to his house, Kg1 16:4. He lives not either to see or feel the punishment threatened, yet he was himself the greatest delinquent. Certainly there must be a future state, in which impenitent sinners will suffer in their own persons, and not escape, as often they do in this world. Baasha died under no visible stroke of divine vengeance for aught that appears, but God laid up his iniquity for his children, as Job speaks, Job 21:19. Thus he often visits sin. Observe, Baasha is punished by the destruction of his children after his death, and his children are punished by the abuse of their bodies after their death; that is the only thing which the threatening specifies (Kg1 16:4), that the dogs and the fowls of the air should eat them, as if herein were designed a tacit intimation that there are punishments after death, when death has done its worst, which will be the sorest punishments and are most to be dreaded; these judgments on the body and posterity signified judgments on the soul when separated from the body, by him who, after he has killed, has power to cast into hell.

III. Execution done at last. Baasha's son Elah, like Jeroboam's son Nadab, reigned two years, and then was slain by Zimri, one of his own soldiers, as Nadab was by Baasha; so like was his house made to that of Jeroboam, as was threatened, Kg1 16:3. Because his idolatry was like his, and one of the sins for which God contended with him being the destruction of Jeroboam's family, the more the destruction of his own resembled that, the nearer did the punishment resemble the sin, as face answers to face in a glass.

1.As then, so now, the king himself was first slain, but Elah fell more ingloriously than Nadab. Nadab was slain in the field of action and honour, he and his army then besieging Gibbethon (Kg1 15:27); but the siege being then raised upon that disaster, and the city remaining still in the Philistines' hands, the army of Israel was now renewing the attempt (Kg1 16:15) and Elah should have been with them to command in chief, but he loved his own ease and safety better than his honour or duty, or the public good, and therefore staid behind to take his pleasure; and, when he was drinking himself drunk in his servant's house, Zimri killed him, Kg1 16:9, Kg1 16:10. Let it be a warning to drunkards, especially to those who designedly drink themselves drunk, that they know not but death may surprise them in that condition. (1.) Death comes easily upon men when they are drunk. Besides the chronic diseases which men frequently bring themselves into by hard drinking, and which cut them off in the midst of their days, men in that condition are more easily overcome by an enemy, as Amnon by Absalom, and are liable to more bad accidents, being unable to help themselves, (2.) Death comes terribly upon men in that condition. Finding them in the act of sin, and incapacitated for any act of devotion, that day comes upon them unawares (Luk 21:34), like a thief.

2.As then, so now, the whole family was cut off, and rooted out. The traitor was the successor, to whom the unthinking people tamely submitted, as if it were all one to them what kind they had, so that they had one. The first thing Zimri did was to slay all the house of Baasha; thus he held by cruelty what he got by treason. His cruelty seems to have extended further than Baasha's did against the house of Jeroboam, for he left to Elah none of his kinsfolks or friends (Kg1 16:11), none of his avengers (so the word is), none that were likely to avenge his death; yet divine justice soon avenged it so remarkably that it was used as a proverb long after, Had Zimri peace who slew his master? Kg2 9:31. In this, (1.) The word of God was fulfilled, Kg1 16:12. (2.) The sins of Baasha and Elah were reckoned for, with which they provoked God by their vanities, Kg1 16:13. Their idols are called their vanities, for they cannot profit nor help. Miserable are those whose deities are vanities.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 1–14. Public domain.
Copy as
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying 1 Kings 16:11 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.