Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
And Zimri went in and smote him, and killed him, in the twenty and seventh year of Asa king of Judah, and reigned in his stead.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
And Zimri H2174 went in H935 and smote H5221 him, and killed H4191 him, in the twenty H6242 and seventh H7651 year H8141 of Asa H609 king H4428 of Judah H3063, and reigned H4427 in his stead.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
Zimri entered, struck him down and killed him. This was in the twenty-seventh year of Asa king of Y'hudah; Zimri then took Elah's place as king.
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
So in the twenty-seventh year of Asa’s reign over Judah, Zimri went in, struck Elah down, and killed him. And Zimri reigned in his place.
Ask
American Standard Version
and Zimri went in and smote him, and killed him, in the twenty and seventh year of Asa king of Judah, and reigned in his stead.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
and Zimri went in and struck him, and killed him, in the twenty-seventh year of Asa king of Judah, and reigned in his place.
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
And Zimri came and smote him and killed him, in the seuen and twentie yeere of Asa king of Iudah, and reigned in his stead.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
And Zimri cometh in and smiteth him, and putteth him to death, in the twenty and seventh year of Asa king of Judah, and reigneth in his stead;
Ask
See also
See on the biblical-era map
City Plan: Jerusalem in the Time of Solomon
City Plan: Jerusalem in the Time of Solomon View full PDF
Baasha, Zimri, and Omri
Baasha, Zimri, and Omri View full PDF
Ahab and Ben-Hadad
Ahab and Ben-Hadad View full PDF

Map © Biblica Open Bible Maps · CC BY-SA 4.0

In the KJVVerse 9,294 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

1 Kings 16:10 meticulously records the swift and brutal assassination of King Elah of Israel by Zimri, his chariot commander, an act of regicide that instantly elevated Zimri to the throne. This pivotal and violent transfer of power in the Northern Kingdom transpired during the twenty-seventh year of King Asa's reign in Judah, serving as a stark and immediate fulfillment of divine judgment pronounced against the house of Baasha for their persistent idolatry and profound wickedness.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: This verse is deeply embedded within a particularly tumultuous and morally compromised period of the Northern Kingdom of Israel, as chronicled in 1 Kings 15-16. It immediately follows the brief and ignominious two-year reign of King Elah, who is depicted in 1 Kings 16:9 as "drinking himself drunk in the house of Arza, steward of his house in Tirzah." Elah's assassination by Zimri is explicitly presented as the direct and swift fulfillment of the prophetic word delivered by Jehu against the house of Baasha, Elah's father. Baasha himself had seized the throne through the assassination of Nadab, son of Jeroboam, as recounted in 1 Kings 15:27-28. The narrative consistently highlights a disturbing pattern of regicide, short-lived dynasties, and political instability in Israel, standing in stark contrast to the relatively more stable, though not perfect, Davidic line in Judah. This cyclical violence underscores the consequences of Israel's spiritual rebellion.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: The era of the divided monarchy was characterized by chronic political instability in the Northern Kingdom of Israel. Unlike Judah, which maintained the divinely sanctioned Davidic dynasty, Israel experienced frequent coups, assassinations, and rapid changes of leadership. Kings often ascended to power through violent means, and their reigns were frequently cut short by similar acts of treachery. Tirzah served as the capital of the Northern Kingdom prior to Omri's establishment of Samaria, and its royal palace would have been the focal point of political power and intrigue. Elah's drunkenness, as mentioned in the preceding verse, points to a cultural vulnerability and moral laxity that often accompanied the spiritual decline of these kings, rendering them susceptible to plots and betrayals. The precise chronological anchor, "in the twenty and seventh year of Asa king of Judah," serves to synchronize the chaotic events in Israel with the more stable, albeit not without its own challenges, reign of King Asa in the Southern Kingdom. This synchronism provides a crucial historical reference point, allowing readers to place Israel's internal turmoil within the broader biblical timeline.
  • Key Themes: The assassination of Elah and Zimri's subsequent usurpation powerfully illustrate several recurring and crucial themes within 1 Kings. Foremost among these is Divine Judgment, as the event is explicitly framed as the fulfillment of God's prophecy against the house of Baasha, delivered through the prophet Jehu in 1 Kings 16:3-4. This underscores God's absolute sovereignty over human affairs, demonstrating His ability to use even wicked individuals to accomplish His righteous purposes and execute His justice. Another prominent theme is the Cycles of Violence and Instability that relentlessly plagued the Northern Kingdom. Each new dynasty, established through bloodshed and treachery, often met a similar end, reflecting the profound spiritual and moral chaos that stemmed from their abandonment of the Mosaic covenant. This pervasive instability stands in stark contrast to the enduring and unconditional promise given to the Davidic line in Judah, as recorded in 2 Samuel 7:16. Finally, the Consequences of Idolatry and Sin are vividly portrayed. The kings of Israel, following the pattern set by Jeroboam's establishment of golden calves in 1 Kings 12:28-30, consistently led the people into idolatry and disobedience, which inevitably brought about divine wrath, societal breakdown, and manifested in relentless political upheaval and bloodshed.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • Zimri (Hebrew, Zimrîy, H2174): This proper noun refers to the individual who carried out the assassination of King Elah and subsequently usurped the throne. His name, derived from a root meaning "musical," ironically precedes a reign marked not by harmony but by extreme violence and brevity, lasting only seven days. His actions in this verse initiate a new, albeit short-lived, dynasty born of treachery.
  • Smote (Hebrew, nâkâh, H5221): This verb signifies a forceful and decisive strike. In the context of this verse, it denotes the violent, intentional act of assassination carried out by Zimri against Elah. The term emphasizes the suddenness and impact of the attack, indicating a fatal blow rather than a mere injury. It highlights the brutal efficiency of the coup.
  • Killed (Hebrew, mûwth, H4191): Following "smote," this verb confirms the fatal outcome of Zimri's action. It means "to die" or "to put to death," leaving no ambiguity about Elah's demise. Its inclusion underscores the finality and success of the assassination, ensuring the reader understands that Elah's life was definitively ended.
  • Reigned (Hebrew, mâlak, H4427): This verb means "to reign" or "to ascend the throne." Its use immediately after the description of Elah's death signifies the direct and immediate usurpation of royal authority by Zimri. It confirms that Zimri's act was not merely an assassination but a successful coup d'état, with the swift assumption of the kingship as its objective and outcome.

Verse Breakdown

  • "And Zimri went in and smote him, and killed him": This opening clause describes the core, violent event. The phrase "went in" suggests an invasion of Elah's personal space, likely while he was vulnerable and intoxicated, as indicated in the preceding verse (1 Kings 16:9). The dual verbs "smote" and "killed" emphasize both the violent nature of the attack and its fatal consequence, leaving no doubt about the regicide and the decisive nature of Zimri's action.
  • "in the twenty and seventh year of Asa king of Judah": This parenthetical clause provides a precise chronological marker, anchoring the event in Israel's tumultuous history by correlating it with the reign of a king in the more stable Southern Kingdom. This synchronism not only aids in historical dating but also subtly highlights the stark contrast between the chronic political turmoil and rapid succession in Israel and the relative, albeit imperfect, continuity of the Davidic dynasty in Judah.
  • "and reigned in his stead": This final clause immediately states the outcome and primary purpose of Zimri's violent act. It confirms that the assassination was a successful coup, resulting in Zimri's immediate ascension to the throne. This phrase emphasizes the direct replacement of the former king, signaling the establishment of a new, albeit very short-lived, royal authority.

Literary Devices

The narrative in 1 Kings 16:10 employs several potent literary devices to convey its powerful message and underscore its theological implications. Direct Narration is primary, presenting the brutal facts of the assassination and usurpation with stark simplicity, allowing the event to speak for itself within the broader context of divine prophecy and historical patterns. There is a strong element of Fulfillment of Prophecy, as this act directly realizes the judgment pronounced by the prophet Jehu against the house of Baasha, demonstrating God's sovereign control over even the most chaotic human events. The text also uses Juxtaposition by mentioning the reign of Asa king of Judah, implicitly contrasting the chronic instability and violent succession in the Northern Kingdom with the more enduring, divinely promised Davidic line in the South. Furthermore, a subtle but powerful Irony is present: Elah, the king, is found vulnerable and "drinking himself drunk" (1 Kings 16:9), a state of moral and physical weakness that directly contributes to his downfall, highlighting the severe consequences of unrighteous and undisciplined leadership.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

The assassination of Elah by Zimri serves as a stark testament to God's unwavering sovereignty over human history and His commitment to covenant faithfulness. Even amidst the chaos of human sin, ambition, and violence, God's word, spoken through His prophets, is meticulously fulfilled. This event underscores that no human power, no matter how absolute, can ultimately thwart the divine will or escape divine judgment for persistent unrighteousness and idolatry. The rapid succession of violent coups in the Northern Kingdom illustrates the inherent instability and self-destructive nature of a society that rejects God's established order and embraces idolatry, contrasting sharply with the relative stability promised to the Davidic dynasty in Judah. It is a powerful reminder that true security and lasting peace are found not in human strength or political maneuvering, but in humble obedience to the Lord and adherence to His righteous decrees.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

The historical account of Zimri's coup, while set in a distant past, offers profound and timeless lessons for contemporary believers and societies. It serves as a potent reminder that actions have consequences, especially for those in positions of leadership. Elah's demise, occurring while he was in a state of moral compromise and vulnerability, underscores the critical importance of vigilance, integrity, and sobriety in all aspects of life, particularly for those entrusted with significant responsibility within families, churches, or communities. The recurring cycles of violence and instability in the Northern Kingdom vividly highlight the destructive nature of sin, particularly idolatry and the abandonment of divine principles, which inevitably lead to societal breakdown, political chaos, and personal ruin. Conversely, God's unwavering faithfulness to His prophetic word, even when executed through flawed human agents, reassures us of His ultimate control and perfect justice. This narrative calls us to reflect deeply on the foundations of our own lives and communities: are we building on the shifting sands of human ambition, moral compromise, and self-interest, or on the solid, unshakeable rock of God's eternal truth and righteous ways?

Questions for Reflection

  • How does the swift judgment against Elah's house challenge our understanding of God's justice in the face of persistent sin, both individually and corporately?
  • What are the contemporary implications of a society that disregards divine principles and embraces moral laxity, as seen in the political and moral instability of the Northern Kingdom?
  • In what ways might we, as individuals or communities, be tempted to compromise our integrity or spiritual vigilance, and how can we actively guard against such vulnerabilities in our daily lives?

FAQ

Why is the reign of Asa king of Judah mentioned in this verse?

Answer: The mention of "the twenty and seventh year of Asa king of Judah" serves primarily as a chronological anchor. It helps to synchronize the timeline of events in the Northern Kingdom of Israel with the more stable and continuous reign of the Davidic kings in the Southern Kingdom of Judah. This practice was common in biblical historical narratives to provide a clear temporal framework for the reader. Additionally, it implicitly highlights the stark contrast between the chronic political instability and rapid succession of kings in Israel (where dynasties were often short-lived and ended by violence) and the relative continuity of the Davidic line in Judah, which enjoyed the promise of an enduring throne as detailed in 2 Samuel 7:16.

Was Zimri's act of assassination justified in God's eyes, given that it fulfilled prophecy?

Answer: While Zimri's act of assassinating King Elah directly fulfilled the prophecy of judgment against the house of Baasha, delivered by the prophet Jehu in 1 Kings 16:3-4, this does not mean God condoned Zimri's sin or his violent means. God often uses wicked human actions to accomplish His sovereign purposes, but He does not endorse the sin itself. Zimri acted out of personal ambition and treachery, not out of obedience to divine command. Indeed, Zimri himself would reign for only seven days before facing his own violent end and judgment for his sins, including his role in the destruction of Baasha's house and his own walk in the way of Jeroboam, as recorded in 1 Kings 16:18-19. This demonstrates that God holds all individuals accountable for their actions, even when those actions unwittingly serve a divine purpose.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

The tumultuous narrative of 1 Kings 16:10, with its depiction of a broken kingship and a kingdom plagued by violence and instability, profoundly underscores the desperate need for a true, righteous, and eternal King. The relentless cycle of sin, judgment, and failed human leadership, so vividly illustrated by Zimri's brief and bloody usurpation, points to the utter futility of seeking lasting peace or security in any earthly ruler or political system. This chaotic backdrop in the Northern Kingdom serves as a powerful contrast, highlighting the profound significance of the promised reign of Jesus Christ. Unlike the temporary, flawed, and often wicked kings of Israel who brought judgment upon themselves and their people, Jesus is the eternal King whose kingdom is not of this world and whose reign is marked by justice and peace that knows no end. He is the true Son of David, inheriting the perpetual throne promised to David, a covenant that stands in stark contrast to the broken dynasties of the Northern Kingdom. Christ, the Lamb of God, did not come to seize power through violence but to offer Himself as the ultimate sacrifice for sin, thereby breaking the cycle of death and judgment. Through His perfect life, atoning death, and glorious resurrection, He established a kingdom that will never be destroyed, offering redemption and eternal life to all who believe. In Him, the ultimate fulfillment of perfect kingship is realized, bringing true order, righteousness, and everlasting peace to all who submit to His reign.

Copy as

Commentary on 1 Kings 16 verses 1–14

I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points(1.) (2.) Details

Here is, I. The ruin of the family of Baasha foretold. He was a man likely enough to have raised and established his family - active, politic, and daring; but he was an idolater, and this brought destruction upon his family.

1.God sent him warning of it before. (1.) That, if he were thereby wrought upon to repent and reform, the ruin might be prevented; for God threatens, that he may not strike, as one that desires not the death of sinners. (2.) That, if not, it might appear that the destruction when it did come, whoever might be instruments of it, was the act of God's justice and the punishment of sin.

2.The warning was sent by Jehu the son of Hanani. The father was a seer, or prophet, at the same time (Ch2 16:7), and was sent to Asa king of Judah; but the son, who was young and more active, was sent on this longer and more dangerous expedition to Baasha king of Israel. Juniores ad labores - Toil and adventure are for the young. This Jehu was a prophet and the son of a prophet. Prophecy, thus happily entailed, was worthy of so much the more honour. This Jehu continued long in his usefulness, for we find him reproving Jehoshaphat (Ch2 19:2) above forty years after, and writing the annals of that prince, Ch2 20:34. The message which this prophet brought to Baasha is much the same with that which Ahijah sent to Jeroboam by his wife.

(1.)He reminds Baasha of the great things God had done for him (Kg1 16:2): I exalted thee out of the dust to the throne of glory, a great instance of the divine sovereignty and power, Sa1 2:8. Baasha seemed to have raised himself by his own treachery and cruelty, yet there was a hand of Providence in it, to bring about God's counsel, concerning Jeroboam's house; and God's owning his advancement as his act and deed does by no means amount to the patronising of his ambition and treachery. It is God that puts power into bad men's hands, which he makes to serve his good purposes, notwithstanding the bad use they make of it. I made thee prince over my people. God calls Israel his people still, though wretchedly corrupted, because they retained the covenant of circumcision, and there were many good people among them; it was not till long after that they were called Loammi, not a people, Hos 1:9.

(2.)He charges him with high crimes and misdemeanours, [1.] That he had caused Israel to sin, had seduced God's subjects from their allegiance and brought them to pay to dunghill-deities the homage due to him only, and herein he had walked in the way of Jeroboam (Kg1 16:2), and been like his house, Kg1 16:7. [2.] That he had himself provoked God to anger with the work of his hands, that is, by worshipping images, the work of men's hands; though perhaps others made them, yet he served them and thereby avowed the making of them, and they are therefore called the work of his hands. [3.] That he had destroyed the house of Jeroboam (Kg1 16:7), because he killed him, namely, Jeroboam's son and all his: if he had done that with an eye to God, to his will and glory, and from a holy indignation against the sins of Jeroboam and his house, he would have been accepted and applauded as a minister of God's justice; but, as he did it, he was only the tool of God's justice, but a servant to his own lusts, and is justly punished for the malice and ambition which actuated and governed him in all he did. Note, Those who are in any way employed in denouncing or executing the justice of God (magistrates or ministers) are concerned to do it from a good principle and in a holy manner, lest it turn into sin to them and they make themselves obnoxious by it.

(3.)He foretels the same destruction to come upon his family which he himself had been employed to bring upon the family of Jeroboam, Kg1 16:3, Kg1 16:4. Note, Those who resemble others in their sins may expect to resemble them in their plagues, especially those who seem zealous against such sins in others as they allow themselves in; the house of Jehu was reckoned with for the blood of the house of Ahab, Hos 1:4.

II. A reprieve granted for some time, so long that Baasha himself dies in peace, and is buried with honour in his own royal city (Kg1 16:6), so far is he from being a prey either to the dogs or to the fowls, which yet was threatened to his house, Kg1 16:4. He lives not either to see or feel the punishment threatened, yet he was himself the greatest delinquent. Certainly there must be a future state, in which impenitent sinners will suffer in their own persons, and not escape, as often they do in this world. Baasha died under no visible stroke of divine vengeance for aught that appears, but God laid up his iniquity for his children, as Job speaks, Job 21:19. Thus he often visits sin. Observe, Baasha is punished by the destruction of his children after his death, and his children are punished by the abuse of their bodies after their death; that is the only thing which the threatening specifies (Kg1 16:4), that the dogs and the fowls of the air should eat them, as if herein were designed a tacit intimation that there are punishments after death, when death has done its worst, which will be the sorest punishments and are most to be dreaded; these judgments on the body and posterity signified judgments on the soul when separated from the body, by him who, after he has killed, has power to cast into hell.

III. Execution done at last. Baasha's son Elah, like Jeroboam's son Nadab, reigned two years, and then was slain by Zimri, one of his own soldiers, as Nadab was by Baasha; so like was his house made to that of Jeroboam, as was threatened, Kg1 16:3. Because his idolatry was like his, and one of the sins for which God contended with him being the destruction of Jeroboam's family, the more the destruction of his own resembled that, the nearer did the punishment resemble the sin, as face answers to face in a glass.

1.As then, so now, the king himself was first slain, but Elah fell more ingloriously than Nadab. Nadab was slain in the field of action and honour, he and his army then besieging Gibbethon (Kg1 15:27); but the siege being then raised upon that disaster, and the city remaining still in the Philistines' hands, the army of Israel was now renewing the attempt (Kg1 16:15) and Elah should have been with them to command in chief, but he loved his own ease and safety better than his honour or duty, or the public good, and therefore staid behind to take his pleasure; and, when he was drinking himself drunk in his servant's house, Zimri killed him, Kg1 16:9, Kg1 16:10. Let it be a warning to drunkards, especially to those who designedly drink themselves drunk, that they know not but death may surprise them in that condition. (1.) Death comes easily upon men when they are drunk. Besides the chronic diseases which men frequently bring themselves into by hard drinking, and which cut them off in the midst of their days, men in that condition are more easily overcome by an enemy, as Amnon by Absalom, and are liable to more bad accidents, being unable to help themselves, (2.) Death comes terribly upon men in that condition. Finding them in the act of sin, and incapacitated for any act of devotion, that day comes upon them unawares (Luk 21:34), like a thief.

2.As then, so now, the whole family was cut off, and rooted out. The traitor was the successor, to whom the unthinking people tamely submitted, as if it were all one to them what kind they had, so that they had one. The first thing Zimri did was to slay all the house of Baasha; thus he held by cruelty what he got by treason. His cruelty seems to have extended further than Baasha's did against the house of Jeroboam, for he left to Elah none of his kinsfolks or friends (Kg1 16:11), none of his avengers (so the word is), none that were likely to avenge his death; yet divine justice soon avenged it so remarkably that it was used as a proverb long after, Had Zimri peace who slew his master? Kg2 9:31. In this, (1.) The word of God was fulfilled, Kg1 16:12. (2.) The sins of Baasha and Elah were reckoned for, with which they provoked God by their vanities, Kg1 16:13. Their idols are called their vanities, for they cannot profit nor help. Miserable are those whose deities are vanities.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 1–14. Public domain.
Copy as
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying 1 Kings 16:10 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.