Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
And Bela the son of Azaz, the son of Shema, the son of Joel, who dwelt in Aroer, even unto Nebo and Baalmeon:
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
And Bela H1106 the son H1121 of Azaz H5811, the son H1121 of Shema H8087, the son H1121 of Joel H3100, who dwelt H3427 in Aroer H6177, even unto Nebo H5015 and Baalmeon H1186:
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
and Bela the son of 'Azaz the son of Sh'ma the son of Yo'el. He lived in 'Aro'er, with territory extending to N'vo and Ba'al-M'on;
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
Jeiel the chief, Zechariah, and Bela son of Azaz, the son of Shema, the son of Joel. They settled in Aroer and as far as Nebo and Baal-meon.
Ask
American Standard Version
and Bela the son of Azaz, the son of Shema, the son of Joel, who dwelt in Aroer, even unto Nebo and Baal-meon:
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
and Bela the son of Azaz, the son of Shema, the son of Joel, who lived in Aroer, even to Nebo and Baal Meon:
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
And Bela the sonne of Azaz, the sonne of Shema, the sonne of Ioel, which dwelt in Aroer, euen vnto Nebo and Baal meon.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
and Bela son of Azaz, son of Shema, son of Joel--he is dwelling in Aroer, even unto Nebo and Baal-Meon;
Ask

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

1 Chronicles 5:8 continues the meticulous genealogical record of the tribe of Reuben, specifically tracing the lineage of Bela through his ancestors Azaz, Shema, and Joel. This verse precisely delineates the geographical extent of their settlement within the Transjordan region, marking their dwelling from Aroer in the south to Nebo and Baalmeon in the north, thereby underscoring the historical reality and divinely allotted inheritance of this prominent Reubenite family within the broader narrative of Israel's tribal allocations.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: The book of 1 Chronicles commences with an extensive and detailed series of genealogies, spanning chapters 1-9. This meticulous record serves a crucial purpose for the post-exilic community, re-establishing their identity, confirming tribal affiliations, validating land claims, and organizing the temple service for those returning to Judah. Chapter 5 specifically focuses on the tribes settled east of the Jordan River: Reuben, Gad, and the half-tribe of Manasseh. Verses 1-10 are dedicated to Reuben, the firstborn, outlining his descendants and their territorial holdings despite his loss of the birthright. Within this section, verse 8 zeroes in on a particular branch of Reuben's lineage, that of Bela, and precisely defines the geographical boundaries of their habitation. This emphasis on tangible locations grounds the genealogical claims in historical reality, reinforcing the divine promise of land inheritance within the broader narrative of Israel's covenant history.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: The compilation of the genealogies in Chronicles occurred during the post-exilic period (c. 450-400 BCE), a time when the Jewish community was grappling with questions of identity, continuity, and restoration after the Babylonian captivity. For ancient Israel, lineage was foundational, determining tribal affiliation, social standing, priestly eligibility, and, most importantly, land inheritance—the tangible expression of God's covenant faithfulness. The Transjordan region, where Reuben settled, was a fertile plateau east of the Dead Sea, distinct from the main land of Canaan. This territory was acquired early in Israel's conquest under Moses, as detailed in Numbers 32. The mention of specific cities like Aroer, Nebo, and Baalmeon anchors the account in verifiable geography, reflecting the meticulous record-keeping tradition essential for validating land claims and tribal rights in a period of national rebuilding.
  • Key Themes: This verse contributes significantly to several overarching themes in Chronicles. Primarily, it highlights Divine Faithfulness in Preservation, demonstrating God's unwavering commitment to His covenant people by meticulously preserving their lineage and confirming their land inheritance, even through periods of exile and dispersion. It underscores the Importance of Lineage and Inheritance, as tribal identity and the right to the land were foundational to Israelite society, fulfilling the promises made to their patriarchs, particularly the land covenant established with Abraham in Genesis 15:18. Furthermore, the precise naming of individuals and places emphasizes Historical and Geographical Accuracy, grounding the biblical narrative in concrete reality and affirming the reliability of God's word and His providential guidance over Israel's history. The Chronicler's emphasis on these details served to provide hope and assurance to a people seeking to reconnect with their heritage and divine promises.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • Bela (Hebrew, Belaʻ', H1106): As noted in the Strong's data, Bela is a proper noun, the name of an Israelite. He is identified as the firstborn son of Reuben in Genesis 46:21 and 1 Chronicles 5:3. His prominence here, despite Reuben losing his birthright, underscores the Chronicler's interest in preserving the historical tribal structures and land allocations. The inclusion of his specific lineage (son of Azaz, son of Shema, son of Joel) emphasizes the meticulous nature of the genealogical record, tracing a specific family branch within the larger tribe of Reuben and affirming their identity and claim to their territory.
  • Aroer (Hebrew, ‘Ărôwʻêr', H6177): According to the Strong's data, this name signifies "nudity of situation," likely referring to its exposed or open location. Aroer was a significant city located on the northern bank of the Arnon River, often serving as a key boundary marker for Reuben's territory. Its mention here, along with Nebo and Baalmeon, precisely defines the southern extent of the Reubenite dwelling. Aroer is frequently cited in biblical texts as a geographical landmark, for instance, in Deuteronomy 3:12 and Joshua 13:16. Its inclusion here highlights the historical and geographical precision of the Chronicler's account, grounding the genealogical claims in tangible, recognized locations.
  • Baalmeon (Hebrew, _Baʻal Mᵉʻôwn'_, H1186): This name, meaning "Baal of (the) habitation," indicates its pre-Israelite origins and association with the Canaanite deity Baal, though it was later integrated into Israelite territory. Also known as Beth-meon or Beth-baal-meon, this city was situated in the fertile plains of Moab, within the territory allotted to Reuben. Its mention alongside Aroer and Nebo further delineates the geographical spread of the Reubenite settlement, indicating a significant presence in the region. The city is also referenced in Numbers 32:38 and Ezekiel 25:9, underscoring its historical importance as a marker of the Reubenite inheritance.

Verse Breakdown

  • "And Bela the son of Azaz, the son of Shema, the son of Joel": This clause meticulously traces a specific patrilineal descent within the tribe of Reuben. Bela is identified as a significant figure, and his lineage is detailed through three generations: Azaz, Shema, and Joel. This emphasis on individual names and their ancestral connections served to affirm identity, establish tribal rights, and confirm the historical continuity of the Reubenite families. For the post-exilic audience, such precise genealogical records were crucial for re-establishing community structure, validating land claims, and reinforcing their connection to the promises of God.
  • "who dwelt in Aroer, even unto Nebo and Baalmeon": This phrase provides the geographical scope of the settlement of Bela's descendants, effectively mapping their territorial claim. "Aroer" marks a significant southern boundary in Reuben's territory, located on the Arnon River. The phrase "even unto Nebo and Baalmeon" indicates the northern and perhaps western extent of their habitation, encompassing a considerable portion of the fertile Transjordan plateau. Mount Nebo is famously known as the place from which Moses viewed the Promised Land. Baalmeon was another prominent city in the region, confirming the Reubenites' historical presence and established land inheritance in this area, thereby demonstrating the tangible fulfillment of the divine promise of territory.

Literary Devices

1 Chronicles 5:8, like much of the opening chapters of Chronicles, primarily employs Genealogy as its foundational literary device. This meticulous listing of names and lineages serves not merely as a dry record but as a profound theological statement, affirming God's faithfulness in preserving His covenant people and their identity across generations, especially crucial for a post-exilic community. Coupled with genealogy is Toponymy, the strategic use of place names (Aroer, Nebo, Baalmeon). These specific geographical markers ground the abstract genealogical claims in concrete, verifiable locations, thereby lending historical credibility to the narrative and emphasizing the tangible fulfillment of God's land promises. The repetitive structure of "the son of" within the lineage also functions as a form of Repetition, reinforcing the unbroken chain of descent and the continuity of the tribal identity. Together, these devices construct a narrative that is both historically precise and theologically significant, assuring the post-exilic community of their enduring heritage and God's unwavering commitment to His word.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

1 Chronicles 5:8, though seemingly a simple genealogical entry, carries profound theological weight. It underscores God's meticulous attention to detail and His unwavering faithfulness to His covenant promises, particularly concerning the land inheritance of His people. The precise naming of individuals and locations affirms that God's plan is not abstract but deeply rooted in historical and geographical realities. This passage reminds us that every individual and family, even those seemingly minor in the grand narrative, plays a vital role in God's overarching redemptive design. The preservation of these records, especially after the exile, served as a powerful reminder to Israel that their identity and future were secure in God's hands, reinforcing their hope and encouraging their return to their heritage and worship. This commitment of God to His people and His promises is a consistent thread throughout salvation history.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

While a list of names and places might initially seem distant from contemporary life, 1 Chronicles 5:8 offers rich ground for reflection. It calls us to consider the profound significance of our own lineage—not just biological, but spiritual. Just as God meticulously preserved the records of Israel's tribes and their land, He cares for the intricate details of our lives, knowing our past, present, and future. This verse encourages us to value our heritage in faith, recognizing that we are part of a larger, ongoing story of God's redemptive work. It reminds us that even seemingly small or obscure contributions within God's kingdom are vital and noticed by Him. Our identity is not merely self-defined but is deeply rooted in God's sovereign plan and His faithful promises, assuring us that our place in His story is secure and purposeful. This passage invites us to trust in God's providential care over our lives and to find our true belonging within His eternal family.

Questions for Reflection

  • How does understanding God's meticulous attention to detail in genealogies encourage you about His care for the details of your own life?
  • In what ways does your spiritual heritage (your family of faith, church history, theological traditions) shape your identity and understanding of God's work today?
  • How can we, like the Chronicler, ensure that the stories of God's faithfulness are preserved and passed down to future generations in our own contexts?

FAQ

Why are genealogies so important in the Old Testament, especially in Chronicles?

Answer: Genealogies in the Old Testament, particularly in Chronicles, serve multiple crucial purposes. They establish historical continuity from creation to the Chronicler's time, affirming God's ongoing work through generations. For the post-exilic community, they were vital for re-establishing tribal identity, confirming land claims (as seen with Reuben's territory in 1 Chronicles 5:8), and verifying eligibility for temple service (especially for priests and Levites, as detailed in 1 Chronicles 9). The genealogies also demonstrate God's faithfulness to His covenant promises, showing how He preserved a remnant and fulfilled His word through specific lineages, ultimately pointing towards the coming Messiah, whose lineage is meticulously recorded in the New Testament (e.g., Matthew 1).

What is the significance of the specific locations mentioned (Aroer, Nebo, Baalmeon)?

Answer: The mention of specific locations like Aroer, Nebo, and Baalmeon is highly significant because it grounds the genealogical claims in verifiable geographical reality. These cities were well-known landmarks in the Transjordan region, part of the territory allotted to the tribe of Reuben. Aroer, for instance, was a key boundary marker on the Arnon River, frequently mentioned in texts like Deuteronomy 3:12. Mount Nebo is famously the place from which Moses viewed the Promised Land before his death. Baalmeon was another prominent city in Reuben's territory, mentioned in Numbers 32:38. By specifying these places, the Chronicler reinforces the historical accuracy of the land allocations and the tangible fulfillment of God's promises of inheritance to the tribes of Israel, assuring the returning exiles of their rightful claims to their ancestral lands.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

While 1 Chronicles 5:8 details the physical lineage and land inheritance of the tribe of Reuben, its ultimate Christ-centered fulfillment points us to a far greater spiritual inheritance and a more profound lineage. The meticulous genealogies in the Old Testament, including this one, serve as a divine thread leading to the promised Messiah, whose earthly lineage is traced through Abraham and David, as recorded in Matthew 1 and Luke 3. In Christ, the concept of inheritance transcends geographical boundaries and tribal affiliations. Believers, regardless of their earthly lineage, are adopted into God's family, becoming spiritual heirs with Christ. The "dwelling" described for Bela's descendants foreshadows the ultimate dwelling God desires with His people, fully realized in Christ, who is the true temple and in whom we find our eternal home and rest. Through His sacrifice, Jesus secures for us an imperishable inheritance, not of land, but of eternal life and fellowship with God, fulfilling the deepest longings for belonging and security that these ancient genealogies hinted at and providing a spiritual reality that far surpasses any earthly possession.

Copy as

Commentary on 1 Chronicles 5 verses 1–17

I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points

We have here an extract out of the genealogies,

I. Of the tribe of Reuben, where we have,

1.The reason why this tribe is thus postponed. It is confessed that Reuben was the first-born of Israel, and, upon that account, might challenge the precedency; but he forfeited his birthright by defiling his father's concubine, and was, for that, sentenced not to excel, Gen 49:4. Sin lessens men, thrusts them down from their excellency. Seventh-commandment sins especially leave an indelible stain upon men's names and families, a reproach which time will not wipe away. Reuben's seed, to the last, bear the disgrace of Reuben's sin. Yet, though that tribe was degraded, it was not discarded or disinherited. The sullying of the honour of an Israelite is not the losing of his happiness. Reuben loses his birthright, yet it does not devolve upon Simeon the next in order; for it was typical, and therefore must attend, not the course of nature, but the choice of grace. The advantages of the birthright were dominion and a double portion. Reuben having forfeited these, it was thought too much that both should be transferred to any one, and therefore they were divided. (1.) Joseph had the double portion; for two tribes descended from him, Ephraim and Manasseh, each of whom had a child's part (for so Jacob by faith blessed them, Heb 11:21; Gen 48:15, Gen 48:22), and each of those tribes was as considerable, and made as good a figure, as any one of the twelve, except Judah. But, (2.) Judah had the dominion; on him the dying patriarch entailed the sceptre, Gen 49:10 Of him came the chief ruler, David first, and, in the fulness of time, Messiah the Prince, Mic 5:2. This honour was secured to Judah, though the birthright was Joseph's; and, having this, he needed not envy Joseph the double portion.

2.The genealogy of the princes of this tribe, the chief family of it (many, no doubt, being omitted), to Beerah, who was head of this clan when the king of Assyria carried them captive, Ch1 5:4-6. Perhaps he is mentioned as prince of the Reubenites at that time because he did not do his part to prevent the captivity.

3.The enlargement of the coasts of this tribe. They increasing, and their cattle being multiplied, they crowded out their neighbours the Hagarites, and extended their conquests, though not to the river Euphrates, yet to the wilderness which abutted upon that river, Ch1 5:9, Ch1 5:10. Thus God did for his people as he promised them: he cast out the enemy from before them by little and little, and gave them their land as they had occasion for it, Exo 23:30.

II. Of the tribe of Gad. Some great families of that tribe are here named (Ch1 5:12), seven that were the children of Abihail, whose pedigree is carried upwards from the son to the father (Ch1 5:14, Ch1 5:15), as that Ch1 5:4, Ch1 5:5, is brought downwards from father to son. These genealogies were perfected in the days of Jotham king of Judah, but were begun some years before, in the reign of Jeroboam II, king of Israel. What particular reason there was for taking these accounts then does not appear; but it was just before they were carried away captive by the Assyrians, as appears Kg2 15:29, Kg2 15:31. When the judgments of God were ready to break out against them for their wretched degeneracy and apostasy then were they priding themselves in their genealogies, that they were the children of the covenant; as the Jews, in our Saviour's time, who, when they were ripe for ruin, boasted, We have Abraham to our father. Or there might be a special providence in it, and a favourable intimation that though they were, for the present, cast out, they were not cast off for ever. What we design to call for hereafter we keep an inventory of.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 1–17. Public domain.
Copy as
Theodoret of CyrusAD 458
QUESTIONS ON FIRST CHRONICLES, PROLOGUE
The Chronicles also speak about the tabernacle because a temple of the Lord had not yet been built by either Samuel or David. The text also adds that that the holy services were held in the tabernacle. Worship was observed at that time according to the number of the days of the week. For it also says, “and their kindred who were in their villages were obliged to come in every seven days, in turn, to be with them.” With regard to the holy utensils it says, “Some of them had charge of the utensils of service, for they were required to count them when they were brought in and taken out. Others of them were appointed over the furniture, and over all the holy utensils, also over the choice flour, the wine, the oil, the incense and the spices.” And about the priests it says, “Others, of the sons of the priests, prepared the mixing of the spices.” With regard to the tomb of Saul the Chronicles gives us much information, and in the Book of Kings itself we read that his bones were gathered and buried in the land of Jabesh.
Theodoret of CyrusAD 458
QUESTIONS ON 1 CHRONICLES, PROLOGUE
There is abundant information in the books of Chronicles which were written to continue the books of the Kings and to preserve the memory of such important events. The first book begins with a genealogy that sets out to demonstrate how the human race came from a single man. Since it focuses only on the single kingdom of Judah, it can tell us about its cities and the villages, and from where they took their names. Here we come to know Nathan, from whom the blessed Luke constructed the beginning of his genealogy of our Lord and Savior, Son of David and Solomon’s brother4 on his mother’s side: “The following children were born to him in Jerusalem: Shimeah, Shobab, Nathan and Solomon, that is, the four children he fathered with Bersabea, daughter of Ammiel.” And Rechab6 herself, who is mentioned in many books of Scripture, is said to have come from the tribe of Judah.It also clearly explains why Reuben lost his birthright and Joseph gained it and also, finally, the reason why the tribe of Judah obtained the highest honor: “The sons of Reuben the firstborn of Israel. He was the firstborn, but because he defiled his father’s bed his birthright was given to the sons of Joseph son of Israel, so that he is not enrolled in the genealogy according to the birthright; though Judah became prominent among his brothers and a ruler came from him, yet the birthright belonged to Joseph.” It also explains the reason why such a great honor was conceded to Joseph. By the will of God Judah had the dignity of receiving the Lord who was born from him according to the flesh. This is the sense tacitly expressed with the words “a leader from him.” Indeed the passage seems to assert that not only the kings of the earth derived from Judah, but also the eternal king himself who had no beginning and will never end.
It also describes the situation of the tribes beyond the Jordan, those of Reuben and Gad, and even the tribes of Manasseh which later were received into those of the Hagarites and the Itureans, and talks about the tribes of the Naphiseans, and all those peoples who entered into conflict with them. In addition the text relates how they fought and won, and made the Hagarites flee. And it also reports the reason for the victory: “When they received help against them, the Hagarites and all who were with them were given into their hands, for they cried to God in the battle, and he granted their entreaty because they trusted in him.” It also describes the amount of the spoils of war: “They captured their livestock: 50, of their camels, 250, sheep, 2, donkeys and 100, captives. Many were slain because the war was from God. And they lived in their territory until the exile.”
Theodoret of CyrusAD 458
QUESTIONS ON 1 CHRONICLES, PROLOGUE
The genealogy of the priests and the Levites comes after this. It relates that Zadok, who was high priest at the time of David, had been the eleventh from Aaron; that Azariah, nephew of Zadok, had been the first to receive the priestly anointing in the temple built by Solomon. Among them there was also Jehozadak, who was brought to Babylon as a war prisoner. Jesus9 was his son, a high priest as well, who delivered the people from bondage together with Zerubbabel, and built a temple for the Lord. Here we also learn that Korah, who revolted against the great Moses, was a nephew of Isaar, son of Caath and brother of Amram, Aaron’s and Moses’ father. According to this lineage he was related to the first legislator. But he himself paid in the desert for his errors, although his children did not share the punishment of their father. From here Samuel13 came and then Aeman, who intoned Psalms and was a nephew of the prophet Samuel. In fact he was the son of Joel, son of Samuel. On the other hand, Asaph, one of the singers, came from the lineage of Gerson, son of Levi and brother of Caath. Aetham, who also belonged to the group of the singers, had Merari, the third son of Levi, as great-grandfather.The text also explains the difference between the priests and the Levites. It relates that the Levites were initiated into all the ministries of the holy altar of God: “But Aaron and his sons made offerings on the altar of burnt offering and on the altar of incense, doing all the work of the most holy place, to make atonement for Israel, according to all that Moses the servant of God had commanded.” It seems to me, in fact, that this book was written after the return from Babylon. For this reason it also talks about the bondage and explains its cause: “So all Israel was enrolled by genealogies; and these are written in the book of the Kings of Israel. And Judah was taken into exile in Babylon because of their unfaithfulness. Now the first to live again in their possessions in their towns were Israelites, priests, Levites, and temple servants.” These accounts show that the book was begun after the captivity. Indeed no historian ever relates facts that happened afterwards, but what happened before or during his times. And actually only the prophets have the power to foretell the future. In addition it says that also those who had inhabited that land before them had been enslaved. And actually many of them still live with them: the Canaanites, Chettites, Jebusites, who had been their companions in such a misfortune. Also the priests and the Levites were brought into captivity with the Israelites. I believe that those who were called “the saints’ servants” were then called Nathinim. Many of them, in fact, consecrated themselves to the ministries of the priests and the Levites. There were among them also those who were entrusted with the carrying of the water, the gathering of wood and other necessary duties. Indeed, if it was imposed to the Gabaonites, who were foreigners, to follow Joshua in the praises and to perform some works as porters or carpenters, this task was even more the duty of the Israelites. As a proof of this I have found in the interpretation of Hebrew names that this name means “house of Iaō,” that is, “of the God who is.” The text, in fact, mentions the children of Israel and among them Judah and Benjamin, and Ephraim18 and Manasseh. It also mentions the priests and the Levites, who inhabited those cities. About the Korēnites it says that they derived from Korah. It also says that among them there had been the guardians of the temple of God as well, and it seems that this custom had been introduced by Samuel and David. “All these, who were chosen as gatekeepers at the thresholds, were two hundred twelve. They were enrolled by genealogies in their villages. David and the prophet Samuel established them in their office of trust. So they and their descendants were in charge of the gates of the house of the Lord, that is, the house of the tent, as guards. The gatekeepers were on the four sides, east, west, north, and south.”
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying 1 Chronicles 5:8 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.