Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
The sons of Joel; Shemaiah his son, Gog his son, Shimei his son,
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
The sons H1121 of Joel H3100; Shemaiah H8098 his son H1121, Gog H1463 his son H1121, Shimei H8096 his son H1121,
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
The descendants of Yo'el: his son Sh'ma'yah, his son Gog, his son Shim'i,
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
The descendants of Joel:
Ask
American Standard Version
The sons of Joel: Shemaiah his son, Gog his son, Shimei his son,
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
The sons of Joel: Shemaiah his son, Gog his son, Shimei his son,
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
The sonnes of Ioel, Shemaiah his sonne, Gog his sonne, and Shimei his sonne,
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
Sons of Joel: Shemaiah his son, Gog his son, Shimei his son,
Ask
In the KJVVerse 10,433 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

1 Chronicles 5:4, nestled within the extensive genealogies of the tribe of Reuben, meticulously lists "The sons of Joel; Shemaiah his son, Gog his son, Shimei his son." This seemingly simple verse is a vital thread in the Chronicler's larger tapestry, emphasizing God's unwavering faithfulness in preserving the lineage of Israel, particularly for the post-exilic community. It underscores the profound importance of identity, inheritance, and the divinely ordained continuity of God's covenant people, even through generations that might otherwise seem obscure or insignificant.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: The book of 1 Chronicles opens with an expansive and detailed genealogical record, spanning from Adam through the patriarchs and the twelve tribes of Israel. This particular verse is situated within the tribal register of Reuben, Jacob's firstborn son, found in 1 Chronicles 5. While Reuben was indeed the firstborn, he forfeited his birthright due to a grave transgression (Genesis 35:22 and Genesis 49:4), leading to a significant redistribution of his preeminence. The double portion of the birthright, typically associated with the firstborn, went to Joseph's sons (1 Chronicles 5:1-2), and the royal line was established through Judah (1 Chronicles 5:2). The meticulous listing of names, including those in 1 Chronicles 5:4, serves to underscore the Chronicler's commitment to preserving the tribal records, which were crucial for re-establishing land inheritance, tribal identity, and the legitimacy of priestly or royal succession following the Babylonian exile. The flow of names, son after father, creates a profound sense of continuity and divine oversight across generations, affirming God's enduring plan.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: The genealogies in Chronicles were compiled and edited primarily for the post-exilic community, those who had returned from Babylon to rebuild Jerusalem and re-establish their national and religious identity. In ancient Israelite society, genealogies were far more than mere lists of names; they were foundational legal and social documents. They served as indisputable proofs for land ownership, tribal affiliation, and eligibility for priestly service or leadership roles within the restored community. For a people returning from exile, these records provided a tangible and vital link to their past, affirming their covenant relationship with God and their rightful place in the land promised to their ancestors. The emphasis on specific lineages, even those of tribes like Reuben who did not hold the primary leadership roles, highlights the Chronicler's concern for the unity and comprehensive identity of all Israel, reminding them of their shared heritage and God's enduring covenant promises. The inclusion of names like "Gog" (distinct from the later prophetic figure in Ezekiel 38) also reflects the commonality of certain names across different individuals and periods in Israelite history, emphasizing the historical reality of these records.
  • Key Themes: This verse, embedded within the broader genealogical framework of Chronicles, contributes significantly to several profound theological and narrative themes. Primarily, it emphasizes the preservation of lineage, illustrating God's unwavering faithfulness in maintaining a remnant and ensuring the continuity of His people through countless generations, even amidst periods of judgment and exile. These lists reinforce the concept of divine order and identity, where every individual, regardless of their prominence, holds a specific and valued place within the larger covenant community of Israel. Each name, though seemingly minor on its own, contributes to the grand narrative of God's unfolding plan for His people, demonstrating His meticulous attention to detail and His providential care. Furthermore, the Chronicler's commitment to historical accuracy and detailed record-keeping provides a robust foundation for the post-exilic community's present and future, connecting them irrevocably to the covenant promises made to their forefathers. This attention to historical continuity and the careful enumeration of descendants, as seen in the detailed records of the tribes of Israel in 1 Chronicles 2-9, reflects a deep respect for God's providential hand in history and His unwavering commitment to His chosen people.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • Shemaiah (Hebrew, Shᵉmaʻyâh, H8098): This name, derived from the Hebrew roots for "heard" and "Yahweh," literally means "Jah has heard" or "Yahweh has heard." Its presence in the genealogy, like many biblical names, carries a theological resonance, subtly pointing to the divine attribute of hearing and responding. While the specific life details of this Shemaiah are not recorded, the name itself serves as a reminder of God's attentiveness to His people, even in the seemingly mundane act of recording lineage.
  • Gog (Hebrew, Gôwg, H1463): In this context, "Gog" functions purely as a personal name within the Israelite lineage, distinct from the more widely known prophetic figure "Gog of Magog" mentioned in Ezekiel. The inclusion of this name here, despite its later prophetic association, highlights the commonality of certain names across different individuals and periods in biblical history, serving primarily to establish a link in the unbroken chain of Reuben's descendants. Its derivation is noted as "of uncertain derivation."
  • Shimei (Hebrew, Shimʻîy, H8096): This name is derived from the Hebrew root for "to hear" and means "famous" or "renowned." Like Shemaiah, it implies a connection to being "heard" or having one's reputation heard. Its primary function in this genealogical list is to establish a direct paternal link, contributing to the comprehensive historical and tribal record of Reuben's descendants. The repeated appearance of this name throughout the Old Testament underscores its common usage and its role in tracing family lines.

Verse Breakdown

  • "The sons of Joel;": This initial phrase establishes the immediate paternal link for the subsequent names. Joel is presented as the father, and the individuals listed thereafter are his direct male descendants. This highlights the patrilineal nature of Israelite genealogies, where lineage is meticulously traced through the male line to establish tribal identity, inheritance rights, and a sense of belonging within the larger covenant community. It connects this specific branch of Reuben's family to the broader tribal structure.
  • "Shemaiah his son, Gog his son, Shimei his son,": This clause enumerates three direct descendants of Joel. The repetitive phrase "his son" serves to emphasize the direct generational succession, creating a clear and unambiguous chain of lineage. While no biographical details are provided for these individuals, their very inclusion signifies their recognized place within the covenant community and their contribution to the continuity of the tribe of Reuben. In a culture where identity, legal standing, and spiritual heritage were intrinsically tied to one's family and tribe, simply being named in such a sacred record was a profound affirmation of existence and belonging within God's chosen people.

Literary Devices

The primary literary devices at play in 1 Chronicles 5:4, and indeed throughout the extensive genealogies of Chronicles, are Enumeration and Repetition. The simple listing of names, meticulously linked by the recurring phrase "his son," serves to systematically enumerate the generations. This seemingly straightforward technique is profoundly effective in conveying a sense of continuity, order, and comprehensiveness. It emphasizes the unbroken chain of lineage, highlighting God's faithfulness in preserving His people through time despite various challenges. The sheer volume of names, even without accompanying narratives, underscores the vastness of God's covenant family and His meticulous attention to every individual within it. This systematic presentation reinforces the historical validity of the Israelite nation and their divinely ordained claim to the land, which was crucial for the post-exilic audience seeking to re-establish their identity and heritage.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

Although 1 Chronicles 5:4 is a simple list of names, it carries significant theological weight. It speaks powerfully to God's meticulous nature and His unwavering commitment to His covenant promises. The preservation of these detailed genealogies, even for individuals whose lives are otherwise unrecorded, demonstrates that every life within God's grand plan has profound significance. It underscores the concept of corporate identity within Israel, where individuals are not isolated but are part of a larger, unfolding story of redemption and inheritance. For the post-exilic community, these lists were not just historical records but a powerful affirmation of God's faithfulness in maintaining a remnant and ensuring the continuity of His people, providing immense hope and a foundational basis for rebuilding their national and spiritual life. They show that God remembers His people across generations, fulfilling His promises through the long sweep of history with precise and loving care.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

For the modern reader, a verse like 1 Chronicles 5:4 might initially appear as a mere historical curiosity, a dry list of names. However, its inclusion in the inspired Word of God invites us to look deeper and discern its profound spiritual implications. It serves as a powerful reminder that God is a God of intricate detail, who knows each of us intimately, even to the number of hairs on our head (Matthew 10:30). Just as He meticulously recorded the lineage of His ancient people, He sees, values, and orchestrates every individual life within His grand narrative. This verse encourages us to appreciate our own place within the larger story of God's redemptive work, whether through our biological family or, more importantly, our spiritual heritage in the family of faith, the church. It calls us to consider the legacy we are building and passing on, recognizing that our faithfulness today contributes significantly to the spiritual continuity for future generations, much like the generations listed here contributed to the continuity of Israel. We are part of a lineage of faith that stretches back to Abraham and forward to the consummation of all things, built on God's enduring faithfulness and meticulous care.

Questions for Reflection

  • How does the meticulous detail of biblical genealogies, like this verse, challenge or deepen your perception of God's attention to individual lives?
  • In what ways does understanding your own spiritual heritage (the history of God's work in the church, or in your family) provide you with grounding and purpose today?
  • What spiritual legacy are you actively building and passing on to the next generation, reflecting the importance of faithfulness across time?

FAQ

Why are biblical genealogies so extensive and seemingly repetitive?

Answer: Biblical genealogies, like the one found in 1 Chronicles 5:4, are extensive and can appear repetitive because they served crucial theological, historical, and legal functions in ancient Israel. The Chronicler, writing for a post-exilic audience, used these lists to establish the identity and legitimacy of the returning community, connecting them directly to the covenant promises made to Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. They provided legal proof for land inheritance, tribal affiliation, and eligibility for priestly or royal service. The repetition emphasizes the continuity of God's covenant faithfulness across generations, demonstrating that despite periods of exile and hardship, God preserved a remnant of His people. Far from being mere lists, they are a profound testament to God's meticulous care for His people and His unwavering commitment to His redemptive plan, ensuring that the lineage leading to the Messiah would be preserved.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

While 1 Chronicles 5:4, a simple listing of names, does not directly prophesy Christ, it finds its profound Christ-centered fulfillment within the broader theological purpose of biblical genealogies. These meticulously preserved records, stretching from Adam through the patriarchs and the tribes of Israel, ultimately serve as the essential historical framework leading to the incarnation of Jesus Christ. God's faithfulness in preserving the lineage of Joel, Shemaiah, Gog, and Shimei, and countless others, underscores His unwavering commitment to His covenant promises, which find their ultimate culmination in the Messiah. The entire genealogical project of the Old Testament, from the promise to Abraham that "all peoples on earth will be blessed through you" (Genesis 12:3) to the detailed records in Matthew 1 and Luke 3, demonstrates God's sovereign hand guiding history to bring forth the Savior. Jesus, as the "son of David, the son of Abraham" (Matthew 1:1), is the ultimate heir to all the promises embedded within these ancient family trees. Thus, every name, every generation, every preserved lineage, including those in 1 Chronicles 5:4, points to the steadfast love of God who meticulously prepared the way for the coming of His Son, the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world, fulfilling all the hopes and promises of Israel and ushering in the new covenant for all who believe.

Copy as

Commentary on 1 Chronicles 5 verses 1–17

I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points

We have here an extract out of the genealogies,

I. Of the tribe of Reuben, where we have,

1.The reason why this tribe is thus postponed. It is confessed that Reuben was the first-born of Israel, and, upon that account, might challenge the precedency; but he forfeited his birthright by defiling his father's concubine, and was, for that, sentenced not to excel, Gen 49:4. Sin lessens men, thrusts them down from their excellency. Seventh-commandment sins especially leave an indelible stain upon men's names and families, a reproach which time will not wipe away. Reuben's seed, to the last, bear the disgrace of Reuben's sin. Yet, though that tribe was degraded, it was not discarded or disinherited. The sullying of the honour of an Israelite is not the losing of his happiness. Reuben loses his birthright, yet it does not devolve upon Simeon the next in order; for it was typical, and therefore must attend, not the course of nature, but the choice of grace. The advantages of the birthright were dominion and a double portion. Reuben having forfeited these, it was thought too much that both should be transferred to any one, and therefore they were divided. (1.) Joseph had the double portion; for two tribes descended from him, Ephraim and Manasseh, each of whom had a child's part (for so Jacob by faith blessed them, Heb 11:21; Gen 48:15, Gen 48:22), and each of those tribes was as considerable, and made as good a figure, as any one of the twelve, except Judah. But, (2.) Judah had the dominion; on him the dying patriarch entailed the sceptre, Gen 49:10 Of him came the chief ruler, David first, and, in the fulness of time, Messiah the Prince, Mic 5:2. This honour was secured to Judah, though the birthright was Joseph's; and, having this, he needed not envy Joseph the double portion.

2.The genealogy of the princes of this tribe, the chief family of it (many, no doubt, being omitted), to Beerah, who was head of this clan when the king of Assyria carried them captive, Ch1 5:4-6. Perhaps he is mentioned as prince of the Reubenites at that time because he did not do his part to prevent the captivity.

3.The enlargement of the coasts of this tribe. They increasing, and their cattle being multiplied, they crowded out their neighbours the Hagarites, and extended their conquests, though not to the river Euphrates, yet to the wilderness which abutted upon that river, Ch1 5:9, Ch1 5:10. Thus God did for his people as he promised them: he cast out the enemy from before them by little and little, and gave them their land as they had occasion for it, Exo 23:30.

II. Of the tribe of Gad. Some great families of that tribe are here named (Ch1 5:12), seven that were the children of Abihail, whose pedigree is carried upwards from the son to the father (Ch1 5:14, Ch1 5:15), as that Ch1 5:4, Ch1 5:5, is brought downwards from father to son. These genealogies were perfected in the days of Jotham king of Judah, but were begun some years before, in the reign of Jeroboam II, king of Israel. What particular reason there was for taking these accounts then does not appear; but it was just before they were carried away captive by the Assyrians, as appears Kg2 15:29, Kg2 15:31. When the judgments of God were ready to break out against them for their wretched degeneracy and apostasy then were they priding themselves in their genealogies, that they were the children of the covenant; as the Jews, in our Saviour's time, who, when they were ripe for ruin, boasted, We have Abraham to our father. Or there might be a special providence in it, and a favourable intimation that though they were, for the present, cast out, they were not cast off for ever. What we design to call for hereafter we keep an inventory of.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 1–17. Public domain.
Copy as
Theodoret of CyrusAD 458
QUESTIONS ON FIRST CHRONICLES, PROLOGUE
The Chronicles also speak about the tabernacle because a temple of the Lord had not yet been built by either Samuel or David. The text also adds that that the holy services were held in the tabernacle. Worship was observed at that time according to the number of the days of the week. For it also says, “and their kindred who were in their villages were obliged to come in every seven days, in turn, to be with them.” With regard to the holy utensils it says, “Some of them had charge of the utensils of service, for they were required to count them when they were brought in and taken out. Others of them were appointed over the furniture, and over all the holy utensils, also over the choice flour, the wine, the oil, the incense and the spices.” And about the priests it says, “Others, of the sons of the priests, prepared the mixing of the spices.” With regard to the tomb of Saul the Chronicles gives us much information, and in the Book of Kings itself we read that his bones were gathered and buried in the land of Jabesh.
Theodoret of CyrusAD 458
QUESTIONS ON 1 CHRONICLES, PROLOGUE
There is abundant information in the books of Chronicles which were written to continue the books of the Kings and to preserve the memory of such important events. The first book begins with a genealogy that sets out to demonstrate how the human race came from a single man. Since it focuses only on the single kingdom of Judah, it can tell us about its cities and the villages, and from where they took their names. Here we come to know Nathan, from whom the blessed Luke constructed the beginning of his genealogy of our Lord and Savior, Son of David and Solomon’s brother4 on his mother’s side: “The following children were born to him in Jerusalem: Shimeah, Shobab, Nathan and Solomon, that is, the four children he fathered with Bersabea, daughter of Ammiel.” And Rechab6 herself, who is mentioned in many books of Scripture, is said to have come from the tribe of Judah.It also clearly explains why Reuben lost his birthright and Joseph gained it and also, finally, the reason why the tribe of Judah obtained the highest honor: “The sons of Reuben the firstborn of Israel. He was the firstborn, but because he defiled his father’s bed his birthright was given to the sons of Joseph son of Israel, so that he is not enrolled in the genealogy according to the birthright; though Judah became prominent among his brothers and a ruler came from him, yet the birthright belonged to Joseph.” It also explains the reason why such a great honor was conceded to Joseph. By the will of God Judah had the dignity of receiving the Lord who was born from him according to the flesh. This is the sense tacitly expressed with the words “a leader from him.” Indeed the passage seems to assert that not only the kings of the earth derived from Judah, but also the eternal king himself who had no beginning and will never end.
It also describes the situation of the tribes beyond the Jordan, those of Reuben and Gad, and even the tribes of Manasseh which later were received into those of the Hagarites and the Itureans, and talks about the tribes of the Naphiseans, and all those peoples who entered into conflict with them. In addition the text relates how they fought and won, and made the Hagarites flee. And it also reports the reason for the victory: “When they received help against them, the Hagarites and all who were with them were given into their hands, for they cried to God in the battle, and he granted their entreaty because they trusted in him.” It also describes the amount of the spoils of war: “They captured their livestock: 50, of their camels, 250, sheep, 2, donkeys and 100, captives. Many were slain because the war was from God. And they lived in their territory until the exile.”
Theodoret of CyrusAD 458
QUESTIONS ON 1 CHRONICLES, PROLOGUE
The genealogy of the priests and the Levites comes after this. It relates that Zadok, who was high priest at the time of David, had been the eleventh from Aaron; that Azariah, nephew of Zadok, had been the first to receive the priestly anointing in the temple built by Solomon. Among them there was also Jehozadak, who was brought to Babylon as a war prisoner. Jesus9 was his son, a high priest as well, who delivered the people from bondage together with Zerubbabel, and built a temple for the Lord. Here we also learn that Korah, who revolted against the great Moses, was a nephew of Isaar, son of Caath and brother of Amram, Aaron’s and Moses’ father. According to this lineage he was related to the first legislator. But he himself paid in the desert for his errors, although his children did not share the punishment of their father. From here Samuel13 came and then Aeman, who intoned Psalms and was a nephew of the prophet Samuel. In fact he was the son of Joel, son of Samuel. On the other hand, Asaph, one of the singers, came from the lineage of Gerson, son of Levi and brother of Caath. Aetham, who also belonged to the group of the singers, had Merari, the third son of Levi, as great-grandfather.The text also explains the difference between the priests and the Levites. It relates that the Levites were initiated into all the ministries of the holy altar of God: “But Aaron and his sons made offerings on the altar of burnt offering and on the altar of incense, doing all the work of the most holy place, to make atonement for Israel, according to all that Moses the servant of God had commanded.” It seems to me, in fact, that this book was written after the return from Babylon. For this reason it also talks about the bondage and explains its cause: “So all Israel was enrolled by genealogies; and these are written in the book of the Kings of Israel. And Judah was taken into exile in Babylon because of their unfaithfulness. Now the first to live again in their possessions in their towns were Israelites, priests, Levites, and temple servants.” These accounts show that the book was begun after the captivity. Indeed no historian ever relates facts that happened afterwards, but what happened before or during his times. And actually only the prophets have the power to foretell the future. In addition it says that also those who had inhabited that land before them had been enslaved. And actually many of them still live with them: the Canaanites, Chettites, Jebusites, who had been their companions in such a misfortune. Also the priests and the Levites were brought into captivity with the Israelites. I believe that those who were called “the saints’ servants” were then called Nathinim. Many of them, in fact, consecrated themselves to the ministries of the priests and the Levites. There were among them also those who were entrusted with the carrying of the water, the gathering of wood and other necessary duties. Indeed, if it was imposed to the Gabaonites, who were foreigners, to follow Joshua in the praises and to perform some works as porters or carpenters, this task was even more the duty of the Israelites. As a proof of this I have found in the interpretation of Hebrew names that this name means “house of Iaō,” that is, “of the God who is.” The text, in fact, mentions the children of Israel and among them Judah and Benjamin, and Ephraim18 and Manasseh. It also mentions the priests and the Levites, who inhabited those cities. About the Korēnites it says that they derived from Korah. It also says that among them there had been the guardians of the temple of God as well, and it seems that this custom had been introduced by Samuel and David. “All these, who were chosen as gatekeepers at the thresholds, were two hundred twelve. They were enrolled by genealogies in their villages. David and the prophet Samuel established them in their office of trust. So they and their descendants were in charge of the gates of the house of the Lord, that is, the house of the tent, as guards. The gatekeepers were on the four sides, east, west, north, and south.”
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying 1 Chronicles 5:4 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.