Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
And at Bethuel, and at Hormah, and at Ziklag,
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
And at Bethuel H1328, and at Hormah H2767, and at Ziklag H6860,
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
B'tu'el, Hormah, Ziklag,
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
Bethuel, Hormah, Ziklag,
Ask
American Standard Version
and at Bethuel, and at Hormah, and at Ziklag,
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
and at Bethuel, and at Hormah, and at Ziklag,
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
And at Bethuel, and at Hormah, and at Ziklag,
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
and in Bethuel, and in Hormah, and in Ziklag,
Ask

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

1 Chronicles 4:30, situated within the meticulous genealogies of the tribe of Simeon, precisely lists three significant towns inhabited by Simeon's descendants: Bethuel, Hormah, and Ziklag. This seemingly straightforward enumeration serves a profound purpose for the Chronicler's post-exilic audience, affirming the historical continuity of tribal land claims, underscoring God's unwavering faithfulness in fulfilling His covenant promises regarding the land of Canaan, and providing a foundational record for re-establishing Israelite identity and heritage after the Babylonian exile.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: 1 Chronicles 4 is an integral part of the Chronicler's extensive genealogical record, which spans chapters 1-9 and serves as the foundational framework for the entire book. Specifically, this chapter meticulously details the lineage of Judah (vv. 1-23) and Simeon (vv. 24-43). Verse 30 is embedded within a detailed list of towns and villages belonging to the tribe of Simeon (vv. 28-33), immediately preceding an account of Simeonites seeking new pasturelands and conquering additional territory (vv. 34-43). This careful cataloging of settlements is not merely an administrative record but a theological statement, emphasizing the Chronicler's profound concern for land inheritance as a tangible sign of God's covenant faithfulness and a crucial element for the re-establishment of the community after the Babylonian exile. The inclusion of these specific place names validates the historical claims and tribal identities of the returning exiles, grounding their present reality in their divinely ordained past.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: The Chronicler composed this work centuries after the events described, most likely during the post-exilic period (5th-4th century BCE). For this audience, who had returned from Babylonian captivity to a devastated homeland, the detailed genealogies and land allocations were absolutely vital. They provided a crucial sense of continuity with their ancestral heritage and legitimate claims to the land promised by God. In ancient Israel, land was far more than mere property; it was a sacred trust, an inheritance given by God, symbolizing covenant relationship, security, and identity. The tribe of Simeon, uniquely among the tribes, had its inheritance within the larger territory of Judah, as meticulously detailed in Joshua 19:1-9. This geographical integration, coupled with Simeon's relatively small size and later historical obscurity, made the preservation of their specific land claims particularly important for the Chronicler, ensuring that no tribe's divinely allotted portion was forgotten or overlooked in the post-exilic reconstruction.
  • Key Themes: The listing of these towns in 1 Chronicles 4:30 contributes significantly to several overarching themes within the book of Chronicles. Firstly, it powerfully highlights Divine Faithfulness, demonstrating God's meticulous fulfillment of His promises concerning the land of Canaan, first given to Abraham and later distributed through Joshua, as seen in passages like Joshua 19. Secondly, it reinforces the enduring theme of Ancestral Inheritance and Land Tenure, emphasizing the foundational importance of tribal boundaries and the divinely granted right to possess the land as a core element of Israelite identity and covenant blessing. Thirdly, the detailed record-keeping underscores the Chronicler's commitment to Historical Continuity and Genealogical Preservation, providing a vital, unbroken link between the past and the present for a community seeking to rebuild its identity and structure after the trauma of exile. This meticulous attention to detail, even for seemingly minor place names, served to legitimize the returning community's claim to their heritage and their rightful place in God's ongoing redemptive plan.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • Bethuel (Hebrew, Bᵉthûwʼêl', H1328): As derived from the provided Strong's data, this name means "destroyed of God." Its inclusion as a city of Simeon (also referred to as Bethul in Joshua 19:4) points to a place whose history may have involved divine judgment or significant upheaval. For the Chronicler's audience, the name could serve as a subtle reminder of God's sovereign power, capable of both destruction and restoration, reflecting the post-exilic experience of Israel.
  • Hormah (Hebrew, Chormâh', H2767): From the root meaning "devoted," this name carries a potent historical and theological weight, signifying "devoted to destruction" or "utter destruction." Originally named Zephath, it was renamed Hormah after a significant Israelite victory over the Canaanites, following an earlier defeat (see Numbers 14:45 and Numbers 21:3). The name serves as a perpetual reminder of God's judgment against the Canaanites and His faithfulness in granting victory to Israel when they were obedient to His commands. Its presence in Simeon's list connects this tribe to a broader narrative of conquest and divine intervention in the land.
  • Ziklag (Hebrew, Tsiqlag', H6860): The derivation of Ziklag is uncertain, as noted in the Strong's data. This city is perhaps the most historically prominent of the three, famously known as the Philistine city given to David by Achish, king of Gath, where David resided during his flight from Saul (1 Samuel 27:6). Its inclusion here in Simeon's territory indicates its original tribal allocation, highlighting the complex and fluid nature of ancient borders and control. The city's later association with David underscores its strategic importance and its role in the unfolding history of Israel's monarchy, even as it remained part of Simeon's ancestral inheritance.

Verse Breakdown

  • "And at Bethuel": This phrase precisely identifies Bethuel as one of the key settlements within the tribal inheritance of Simeon. The meticulous listing of specific towns, rather than general regions, underscores the Chronicler's commitment to precise historical record-keeping and the enduring validity of the land distribution. The name Bethuel, meaning "destroyed of God," subtly hints at a past marked by divine action, perhaps judgment or significant change, aligning with the broader narrative of God's interaction with His people and the land.
  • "and at Hormah": The inclusion of Hormah points to a city with a rich and dramatic history, signifying both Israelite defeat and decisive victory. Its name, "devoted to destruction," serves as a powerful historical marker, reminding the audience of God's judgment and His power to grant triumph over enemies. For the Chronicler's audience, this name would have evoked deep memories of divine intervention and the fulfillment of vows made in battle, connecting Simeon's territory to the broader narrative of Israel's conquest of Canaan.
  • "and at Ziklag": Ziklag's mention highlights a city that played a significant, albeit complex, role in the early life of King David. While later associated with David and the Philistines, its listing here confirms its original status as part of Simeon's inheritance. This demonstrates the Chronicler's comprehensive approach to detailing the historical claims of each tribe, even for cities whose control shifted over time. Ziklag's strategic location would have made it a valuable possession, underscoring the enduring importance of these specific land allocations.

Literary Devices

The primary literary device employed in 1 Chronicles 4:30, and indeed throughout much of 1 Chronicles 4, is Enumeration or Cataloging. The verse is a concise list of place names, a characteristic feature in biblical genealogies and land allocations. This cataloging serves to provide a detailed, verifiable record of tribal inheritance, which was essential for the post-exilic community in re-establishing their claims and identity. Related to this is Toponymy, the study of place names. Each name—Bethuel, Hormah, Ziklag—is not merely a label but carries historical, etymological, and often theological significance, alluding to deeper narratives and events. For instance, "Hormah" functions as a potent Historical Allusion, referencing specific events of conquest and divine judgment recorded elsewhere in the Pentateuch and Judges. The very act of listing these names, seemingly dry to a modern reader, would have resonated deeply with the Chronicler's original audience, evoking a rich tapestry of Historical Memory and reinforcing their tangible connection to their ancestral land and the covenant promises associated with it.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

1 Chronicles 4:30, though a simple list of names, is profoundly theological. It powerfully testifies to God's meticulous attention to detail and His unwavering faithfulness to His covenant promises. The land, specifically designated to each tribe, was not merely a geographical possession but a tangible manifestation of God's blessing and a sacred sign of His covenant relationship with Israel. The Chronicler's careful preservation of these details, even for a tribe like Simeon that was largely absorbed into Judah, underscores the enduring validity of God's word and His providential care over His people's inheritance, both physical and spiritual. This faithfulness extends beyond land to every promise God has made, assuring His people that His word will always be fulfilled, regardless of historical circumstances or human failings.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

While 1 Chronicles 4:30 might initially appear as a dry historical record, it offers profound and enduring lessons for contemporary believers. It reminds us that God is a God of meticulous detail, who remembers His promises and faithfully fulfills them, even across generations and through periods of exile, hardship, and apparent loss. Just as the Simeonites had their divinely designated places and inheritance, we too have a divinely appointed place and purpose within God's grand redemptive narrative. This verse encourages us to trust in God's providential care over our lives, recognizing that our ultimate "inheritance" in Christ is eternally secure and meticulously planned. It also calls us to value our spiritual heritage, understanding the rich history of God's faithfulness to His people throughout salvation history, and to consider how we might faithfully preserve and pass on this precious legacy of faith to future generations. Our spiritual "boundaries" and "places" are not random but are part of God's sovereign design for our lives and for the advancement of His eternal kingdom.

Questions for Reflection

  • How does the meticulous detail of God's land allocation for Simeon encourage your trust in His providential care for your own life and circumstances, even in seemingly insignificant details?
  • In what specific ways do you see God's unwavering faithfulness to His promises manifested in your own life or in the broader history of the church today?
  • What does it truly mean for you to have a "spiritual inheritance" in Christ, and how does this compare to the physical land inheritance of ancient Israel?
  • Considering the Chronicler's emphasis on preserving heritage, how can you personally contribute to preserving and faithfully passing on the spiritual heritage of faith to future generations?

FAQ

Why does the Chronicler include such detailed lists of towns and genealogies?

Answer: The Chronicler, writing for a post-exilic community, included detailed lists of towns and genealogies for several crucial and interconnected reasons. Firstly, these records served to re-establish and validate tribal identities and land claims for those returning to Judah. After the Babylonian exile, many had lost their connection to their ancestral lands and lineage. By meticulously detailing these, the Chronicler provided a historical and legal basis for their re-settlement and the re-formation of their community. Secondly, these lists powerfully underscore God's unwavering faithfulness in fulfilling His covenant promises, particularly concerning the land of Canaan, as seen in foundational passages like Genesis 12:7 and the detailed tribal allotments in Joshua 19. The very existence of these towns within Israelite territory, even centuries later, was a tangible testament to God's enduring word and His covenant loyalty. Thirdly, it provided a vital sense of continuity and legitimacy for the re-formed community, connecting them to their glorious past and the lineage of David, upon which their future hopes for a restored monarchy and temple worship rested.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

While 1 Chronicles 4:30 speaks of a physical land inheritance and specific geographical locations, its deeper theological resonance points profoundly to the ultimate spiritual inheritance found in Jesus Christ. The meticulous detail of God's faithfulness in allocating land to Simeon foreshadows the divine precision and absolute certainty of God's redemptive plan, culminating perfectly in Christ. No longer are God's people defined by geographical boundaries or tribal lineages, but by their spiritual union with Christ, who is the true "house of God" (echoing Bethuel's meaning), the living temple in whom God dwells and through whom we have access to the Father (John 2:19-21; Ephesians 2:19-22). The historical significance of Hormah, a place of decisive victory over enemies, finds its ultimate and eternal fulfillment in Christ's triumphant conquest over sin, death, and the powers of darkness on the cross (Colossians 2:15; Hebrews 2:14-15). Furthermore, just as Ziklag served as a strategic refuge and base for David in his time of distress, Christ is our ultimate refuge, our secure foundation, and the unwavering stronghold of our spiritual lives (Psalm 91:2; 1 Corinthians 3:11). Our true inheritance is not a plot of land, but eternal life and all the spiritual blessings "in the heavenly realms in Christ" (Ephesians 1:3), a promised land that is imperishable, undefiled, and unfading, kept in heaven for us by God's power (1 Peter 1:4-5). Thus, these ancient place names ultimately direct our gaze to the person and work of Jesus, in whom all God's promises find their resounding "Yes" and "Amen" (2 Corinthians 1:20).

Copy as

Commentary on 1 Chronicles 4 verses 24–43

We have here some of the genealogies of the tribe of Simeon (though it was not a tribe of great note), especially the princes of that tribe, Ch1 4:38. Of this tribe it is said that they increased greatly, but not like the children of Judah, Ch1 4:27. Those whom God increases ought to be thankful, though they see others that are more increased. Here observe, 1. The cities allotted them (Ch1 4:28), of which see Jos 19:1, etc. When it is said that they were theirs unto the reign of David (Ch1 4:31) intimation is given that when the ten tribes revolted from the house of David many of the Simeonites quitted these cities, because they lay within Judah, and seated themselves elsewhere. 2. The ground they got elsewhere. When those of this tribe that revolted from the house of David were carried captive with the rest into Assyria those that adhered to Judah were remarkably owned of God and prospered in their endeavours to enlarge their coasts. It was in the days of Hezekiah that a generation of Simeonites, whose tribe had long crouched and truckled, was animated to make these bold efforts. (1.) Some of them attacked a place in Arabia, as it should seem, called the entrance of Gedor, inhabited by the posterity of accursed Ham (Ch1 4:40), made themselves masters of it, and dwelt there. This adds to the glory of Hezekiah's pious reign, that, as his kingdom in general prospered, so did particular families. It is said that they found fat pastures, and yet the land was quiet; even when the kings of Assyria were giving disturbance to all their neighbours this land escaped their alarms. The inhabitants being shepherds, who molested none, were not themselves molested, till the Simeonites came and drove them out and succeeded them, not only in the plenty, but in the peace, of their land. Those who dwell (as we do) in a fruitful country, and whose land is wide, and quiet, and peaceable, have reason to own themselves indebted to that God who appoints the bounds of our habitation. (2.) Others of them, to the number of 500, under the command of four brethren here named, made a descent upon Mount Seir, and smote the remainder of the devoted Amalekites, and took possession of their country, Ch1 4:42, Ch1 4:43. Now the curses on Ham and Amalek had a further accomplishment, when they seemed dormant, if not dead; as had also the curse on Simeon, that he should be divided and scattered (Gen 49:7): yet to him it was turned into a blessing, for the families of Simeon, which thus transplanted themselves into those distant countries, are said to dwell there unto this day (Ch1 4:43), by which it should seem they escaped the calamities of the captivity. Providence sometimes sends those out of trouble that are designed for preservation.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 24–43. Public domain.
Copy as
Theodoret of CyrusAD 458
QUESTIONS ON FIRST CHRONICLES, PROLOGUE
The Chronicles also speak about the tabernacle because a temple of the Lord had not yet been built by either Samuel or David. The text also adds that that the holy services were held in the tabernacle. Worship was observed at that time according to the number of the days of the week. For it also says, “and their kindred who were in their villages were obliged to come in every seven days, in turn, to be with them.” With regard to the holy utensils it says, “Some of them had charge of the utensils of service, for they were required to count them when they were brought in and taken out. Others of them were appointed over the furniture, and over all the holy utensils, also over the choice flour, the wine, the oil, the incense and the spices.” And about the priests it says, “Others, of the sons of the priests, prepared the mixing of the spices.” With regard to the tomb of Saul the Chronicles gives us much information, and in the Book of Kings itself we read that his bones were gathered and buried in the land of Jabesh.
Theodoret of CyrusAD 458
QUESTIONS ON 1 CHRONICLES, PROLOGUE
There is abundant information in the books of Chronicles which were written to continue the books of the Kings and to preserve the memory of such important events. The first book begins with a genealogy that sets out to demonstrate how the human race came from a single man. Since it focuses only on the single kingdom of Judah, it can tell us about its cities and the villages, and from where they took their names. Here we come to know Nathan, from whom the blessed Luke constructed the beginning of his genealogy of our Lord and Savior, Son of David and Solomon’s brother4 on his mother’s side: “The following children were born to him in Jerusalem: Shimeah, Shobab, Nathan and Solomon, that is, the four children he fathered with Bersabea, daughter of Ammiel.” And Rechab6 herself, who is mentioned in many books of Scripture, is said to have come from the tribe of Judah.It also clearly explains why Reuben lost his birthright and Joseph gained it and also, finally, the reason why the tribe of Judah obtained the highest honor: “The sons of Reuben the firstborn of Israel. He was the firstborn, but because he defiled his father’s bed his birthright was given to the sons of Joseph son of Israel, so that he is not enrolled in the genealogy according to the birthright; though Judah became prominent among his brothers and a ruler came from him, yet the birthright belonged to Joseph.” It also explains the reason why such a great honor was conceded to Joseph. By the will of God Judah had the dignity of receiving the Lord who was born from him according to the flesh. This is the sense tacitly expressed with the words “a leader from him.” Indeed the passage seems to assert that not only the kings of the earth derived from Judah, but also the eternal king himself who had no beginning and will never end.
It also describes the situation of the tribes beyond the Jordan, those of Reuben and Gad, and even the tribes of Manasseh which later were received into those of the Hagarites and the Itureans, and talks about the tribes of the Naphiseans, and all those peoples who entered into conflict with them. In addition the text relates how they fought and won, and made the Hagarites flee. And it also reports the reason for the victory: “When they received help against them, the Hagarites and all who were with them were given into their hands, for they cried to God in the battle, and he granted their entreaty because they trusted in him.” It also describes the amount of the spoils of war: “They captured their livestock: 50, of their camels, 250, sheep, 2, donkeys and 100, captives. Many were slain because the war was from God. And they lived in their territory until the exile.”
Theodoret of CyrusAD 458
QUESTIONS ON 1 CHRONICLES, PROLOGUE
The genealogy of the priests and the Levites comes after this. It relates that Zadok, who was high priest at the time of David, had been the eleventh from Aaron; that Azariah, nephew of Zadok, had been the first to receive the priestly anointing in the temple built by Solomon. Among them there was also Jehozadak, who was brought to Babylon as a war prisoner. Jesus9 was his son, a high priest as well, who delivered the people from bondage together with Zerubbabel, and built a temple for the Lord. Here we also learn that Korah, who revolted against the great Moses, was a nephew of Isaar, son of Caath and brother of Amram, Aaron’s and Moses’ father. According to this lineage he was related to the first legislator. But he himself paid in the desert for his errors, although his children did not share the punishment of their father. From here Samuel13 came and then Aeman, who intoned Psalms and was a nephew of the prophet Samuel. In fact he was the son of Joel, son of Samuel. On the other hand, Asaph, one of the singers, came from the lineage of Gerson, son of Levi and brother of Caath. Aetham, who also belonged to the group of the singers, had Merari, the third son of Levi, as great-grandfather.The text also explains the difference between the priests and the Levites. It relates that the Levites were initiated into all the ministries of the holy altar of God: “But Aaron and his sons made offerings on the altar of burnt offering and on the altar of incense, doing all the work of the most holy place, to make atonement for Israel, according to all that Moses the servant of God had commanded.” It seems to me, in fact, that this book was written after the return from Babylon. For this reason it also talks about the bondage and explains its cause: “So all Israel was enrolled by genealogies; and these are written in the book of the Kings of Israel. And Judah was taken into exile in Babylon because of their unfaithfulness. Now the first to live again in their possessions in their towns were Israelites, priests, Levites, and temple servants.” These accounts show that the book was begun after the captivity. Indeed no historian ever relates facts that happened afterwards, but what happened before or during his times. And actually only the prophets have the power to foretell the future. In addition it says that also those who had inhabited that land before them had been enslaved. And actually many of them still live with them: the Canaanites, Chettites, Jebusites, who had been their companions in such a misfortune. Also the priests and the Levites were brought into captivity with the Israelites. I believe that those who were called “the saints’ servants” were then called Nathinim. Many of them, in fact, consecrated themselves to the ministries of the priests and the Levites. There were among them also those who were entrusted with the carrying of the water, the gathering of wood and other necessary duties. Indeed, if it was imposed to the Gabaonites, who were foreigners, to follow Joshua in the praises and to perform some works as porters or carpenters, this task was even more the duty of the Israelites. As a proof of this I have found in the interpretation of Hebrew names that this name means “house of Iaō,” that is, “of the God who is.” The text, in fact, mentions the children of Israel and among them Judah and Benjamin, and Ephraim18 and Manasseh. It also mentions the priests and the Levites, who inhabited those cities. About the Korēnites it says that they derived from Korah. It also says that among them there had been the guardians of the temple of God as well, and it seems that this custom had been introduced by Samuel and David. “All these, who were chosen as gatekeepers at the thresholds, were two hundred twelve. They were enrolled by genealogies in their villages. David and the prophet Samuel established them in their office of trust. So they and their descendants were in charge of the gates of the house of the Lord, that is, the house of the tent, as guards. The gatekeepers were on the four sides, east, west, north, and south.”
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying 1 Chronicles 4:30 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.