Skip to content

Romans 1:23

“The Necessity of the Gospel: God’s Wrath Against Sin”Romans 1:18–32

King James Version
And changed the glory of the uncorruptible God into an image made like to corruptible man, and to birds, and fourfooted beasts, and creeping things.

Bible text: King James Version (1769 Blayney text) · Public domain

KJV (with Strong's)
And G2532 changed G236 the glory G1391 of the uncorruptible G862 God G2316 into G1722 an image G1504 made like G3667 to corruptible G5349 man G444, and G2532 to birds G4071, and G2532 fourfooted beasts G5074, and G2532 creeping things G2062.

Bible text: King James Version with Strong's numbers · Public domain

Berean Standard Bible
and exchanged the glory of the immortal God for images of mortal man and birds and animals and reptiles.

Bible text: Berean Standard Bible · Public domain

American Standard Version
and changed the glory of the incorruptible God for the likeness of an image of corruptible man, and of birds, and four-footed beasts, and creeping things.

Bible text: American Standard Version (1901) · Public domain

World English Bible Messianic
and traded the glory of the incorruptible God for the likeness of an image of corruptible man, and of birds, and four-footed animals, and creeping things.

Bible text: World English Bible, Messianic edition · Public domain

Geneva Bible (1599)
For they turned the glorie of the incorruptible God to the similitude of the image of a corruptible man, and of birdes, and foure footed beastes, and of creeping things.

Bible text: Geneva Bible (1599) · Public domain

Young's Literal Translation
and changed the glory of the incorruptible God into the likeness of an image of corruptible man, and of fowls, and of quadrupeds, and of reptiles.

Bible text: Young's Literal Translation · Public domain

King James Version — Interlinear
18 Greek words
  1. καὶkaiandG2532CONJConjunction
  2. ἤλλαξανēllaxanthey changedG236V-AAI-3PVerb Aorist Active Indicative 3rd Plural
  3. τὴνtēntheG3588T-ASFDefinite article Accusative Singular Feminine
  4. δόξανdoxangloryG1391N-ASFNoun Accusative Singular Feminine
  5. τοῦtouof theG3588T-GSMDefinite article Genitive Singular Masculine
  6. ἀφθάρτουaphthartouimmortalG862A-GSMAdjective Genitive Singular Masculine
  7. θεοῦtheouGodG2316N-GSM-TNoun Genitive Singular Masculine Title
  8. ἐνenintoG1722PREPPreposition
  9. ὁμοιώματιhomoiōmatia likenessG3667N-DSNNoun Dative Singular Neuter
  10. εἰκόνοςeikonosof an imageG1504N-GSFNoun Genitive Singular Feminine
  11. φθαρτοῦphthartouof mortalG5349A-GSMAdjective Genitive Singular Masculine
  12. ἀνθρώπουanthrōpoumanG444N-GSMNoun Genitive Singular Masculine
  13. καὶkaiandG2532CONJConjunction
  14. πετεινῶνpeteinōnbirdsG4071N-GPNNoun Genitive Plural Neuter
  15. καὶkaiandG2532CONJConjunction
  16. τετραπόδωνtetrapodōnquadrupedsG5074A-GPNAdjective Genitive Plural Neuter
  17. καὶkaiandG2532CONJConjunction
  18. ἑρπετῶνherpetōncreeping thingsG2062N-GPNNoun Genitive Plural Neuter
English is a literal word-by-word gloss of the Greek, not the KJV's wording. Why?

This is the original text the KJV's translators worked from — each Greek word with its own literal English meaning in this verse, prepared by scholars at Tyndale House, Cambridge. The KJV translates whole sentences, not word by word, so its wording differs: one Greek word can become several English words, and the KJV may choose “charity” where the gloss reads “love”. Both are faithful — they answer different questions. For the KJV's own rendering, switch to the KJV text.

Words in [ ] are added by the English.

Translation differences
Translation
Details
See on the biblical-era maps
In the KJVVerse 27,954 of 31,102 · 89.9%

Study this verse

Written with AI assistance. Always check it against Scripture.

This verse

People traded the glory of the immortal God for idols shaped like mortal men, birds, beasts and creeping things.

“And changed the glory of the uncorruptible God”

They traded the glory of the God who never decays for something else.

“into an image made like to corruptible man,”

A likeness of mortal man, the first and highest of the substitutes.

“and to birds, and fourfooted beasts, and creeping things.”

Down through the creatures of sky, land and ground: the further from God, the lower the worship sank.

Passage studyRomans 1:18–32

The Wrath of God Revealed from Heaven

Summary

Paul has just called the gospel “the power of God unto salvation to every one that believeth” (Romans 1:16–17). In these verses he shows why every one of us needs it. The wrath of God is being revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness, because people know the truth about God and hold it down. God has made his eternal power and Godhead plain in all that he made, so all are without excuse. People who knew him refused to glorify him or thank him, their thinking became empty, and they traded his glory for idols and his truth for a lie. Three times Paul says that God gave them up, to uncleanness, to vile affections and to a reprobate mind. The passage ends with a long list of the sins that follow and with people who applaud those sins in others. Against this dark background the good news shines, because Jesus is the one “which delivered us from the wrath to come” (1 Thessalonians 1:10).

What is the wrath of God, and how is it revealed?

God’s wrath is his settled, righteous opposition to sin, and verse 18 says that it is being revealed from heaven now. The verse begins with “For” (gár), the word that gives the reason for what came just before. The gospel is necessary because of what Paul now describes, and this part of his letter runs on to Romans 3:20 and to its conclusion that “all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God” (Romans 3:23).

The verse sets two revelations side by side. In verse 17 “the righteousness of God” is revealed (Romans 1:17), and in verse 18 “the wrath of God” is revealed. The verb in both is apokalýptō, to take the cover off, to reveal or make fully known, and it is in the present tense. God is making both known today, his saving righteousness in the gospel and his anger against sin.

The word for wrath is orgḗ, and used of God (theós) it means his steady, holy opposition to sin and rebellion. It belongs to his character, and it is the response of a judge to wickedness, bringing consequences in this life and judgment at the end. A psalm says, “God judgeth the righteous, and God is angry with the wicked every day” (Psalm 7:11). Jesus says of the one who refuses to believe the Son that “the wrath of God abideth on him” (John 3:36). Paul warns, “because of these things cometh the wrath of God upon the children of disobedience” (Ephesians 5:6).

This wrath is revealed “from heaven” (apó ouranós). The word means both sky and heaven, and here heaven stands for God himself, so the wrath comes with his own authority. We see it now in the consequences of sin that the rest of the chapter traces (Romans 1:24–32), and it will be seen in full at the judgment to come.

Ungodliness and unrighteousness

God’s wrath is “against all” (epí pâs) ungodliness and unrighteousness, every form and instance of human sin. Ungodliness, asébeia, is irreverence toward God, a failure to honour, worship and respect him. Unrighteousness, adikía, is wrongdoing, a failure to live justly by God’s standard toward other people and in our own character. Joined by “and” (kaí), the two words take in sin against God and sin against his moral law and our neighbour. The rest of the passage shows the first leading to the second, as people who refuse to honour God go on to wrong one another.

Holding the truth in unrighteousness

The people under this wrath are those “who hold the truth in unrighteousness”. The verb katéchō can mean to hold fast or possess, and it can also mean to hold back, restrain or suppress. The verses that follow show that the second sense is meant (Romans 1:19–23). The truth, alḗtheia, is the knowledge of God and of his moral demands that he has given everyone through creation and conscience. People have this truth, and they hold it down “in unrighteousness” (en adikía), by their choices and their way of life, so that it is kept from having its proper effect on them. This suppression is a willful rebellion against what God has shown, and that is what makes their ungodliness inexcusable.

What can everyone know about God?

Everyone can know that God exists and that he is eternal in power and divine, because God himself has shown it in all he made. Paul says, “that which may be known of God is manifest in them; for God hath shewed it unto them” (verse 19). The word gnōstós means known or knowable, and here it is what may be known of God: enough awareness of his existence and power to take away any claim of ignorance. This knowledge leaves a person accountable, and it stops short of saving knowledge. It is “manifest”, phanerós, which means visible, evident, well known. “In them” (en autois) can mean a witness within each person, or what lies open to people as they live in God’s world. It is manifest because God acted: “God hath shewed it unto them.” The verb phaneróō, to make manifest, comes from the same root as phanerós, and God is its subject. Our knowledge of God is something he gave on purpose.

Verse 20 says how he gave it. “The invisible things of him”, his nature and power, are aóratos, unseen by the physical eye, and yet they “are clearly seen”. The verb kathoráō means to see fully and distinctly, so the invisible God is plainly perceived through what is visible. These things are “understood by the things that are made”, and that has been true “from the creation of the world”, so every generation since the beginning has had this witness.

What creation shows is “his eternal power and Godhead”. Power, dýnamis, is might and ability, here God’s power to bring all things into being and keep them there. Godhead, theiótēs, means divinity or divine nature, the attributes that belong to God as God, while its near neighbour theótēs names the divine essence itself. Creation shows that there is a God, that his power is eternal, and that he is divine and set apart from all he made. Paul’s conclusion follows: “so that they are without excuse”. The word anapológētos means indefensible, with every defence taken away.

Scripture says the same in other places. “The heavens declare the glory of God; and the firmament sheweth his handywork” (Psalm 19:1), and the psalm goes on, “There is no speech nor language, where their voice is not heard” (Psalm 19:1–4). The first half of Psalm 19 is given to this testimony of creation (Psalm 19:1–6). At Lystra Paul told a crowd that God “left not himself without witness, in that he did good, and gave us rain from heaven, and fruitful seasons, filling our hearts with food and gladness” (Acts 14:17). At Athens he said that the God who made the world is near every one of us, “For in him we live, and move, and have our being” (Acts 17:24–28).

Can the witness of creation save anyone?

Creation shows that there is a God and that we answer to him, and the gospel shows how a sinner can be reconciled to him. We call the first general revelation, or natural revelation, because it reaches everyone, everywhere, at all times. Special revelation is God making himself known in Scripture, which “is given by inspiration of God” (2 Timothy 3:16), and supremely in his Son, by whom he “hath in these last days spoken unto us” (Hebrews 1:1–3). Creation shows God’s power and deity, and Christ makes known his redeeming love and the way of salvation. Paul asks later in this letter, “how shall they believe in him of whom they have not heard? and how shall they hear without a preacher?” (Romans 10:14). General revelation shows our need, and the gospel meets it. In Paul’s argument people hold down even the knowledge creation gives, so it leaves them guilty, and that is why the gospel of verses 16 and 17 is the remedy.

If God is so clearly seen, why do so many deny him?

Paul has already given the answer in verse 18: people hold the truth down. The trouble lies in the will. To acknowledge God is to admit that we are accountable to him and must submit to his authority, and the fallen heart wants its own way. So the evidence stays in plain view while people turn their eyes from it.

Why did people who knew God turn from him?

They turned from him because they withheld the glory and thanks that were his due, and verse 21 traces what followed. It opens, “when they knew God”. The verb ginṓskō means to know, come to know, perceive or understand, and its most common use is simply having knowledge of something. People ask whether this is saving knowledge. Paul means the awareness of God’s existence and power that creation gives to everyone, which he has just described in verses 19 and 20, and that knowledge should have led to worship and gratitude.

It led instead to two failures. “They glorified him not as God”: the verb doxázō means to honour, praise and magnify, to give someone the worth that belongs to him. They withheld the honour due to God alone as Creator and Lord. “Neither were thankful”: they took his gifts and refused to acknowledge him as the giver of life and of every good thing. This refusal to worship and give thanks is the root from which the idolatry and wrongdoing of the following verses grow (Romans 1:21–23).

Then came two results. They “became vain in their imaginations”. The word dialogismós means inner reasonings and deliberations, even debates within oneself, and “vain” means empty, futile and aimless. Thinking that loses God as its reference point loses its direction and ends in a view of the world built on falsehood. God asked the same of Israel: “What iniquity have your fathers found in me, that they are gone far from me, and have walked after vanity, and are become vain?” (Jeremiah 2:5). Paul describes the Gentiles walking “in the vanity of their mind, Having the understanding darkened” (Ephesians 4:17–19).

And “their foolish heart was darkened”. In Scripture the heart, kardía, is the centre of the person, the seat of mind, will, feeling and moral understanding. The word for “foolish” here is asýnetos, without understanding, and it comes back in the list of verse 31. A heart that turns from the light of God’s truth grows dark, less and less able to see spiritual reality and moral good. This darkening is part of God’s just judgment on their refusal to honour him, and Paul spells that judgment out from verse 24.

Professing to be wise, they became fools

Verse 22 states the irony plainly. “Professing themselves to be wise”: pháskō means to assert or claim, an open declaration. sophós is the ordinary word for wise, covering insight, skill and moral discernment. “They became fools”: mōraínō means to make foolish or insipid, and it comes from mōrós, the source of the English “moron”. The verb is passive, “they were made foolish”, which fits the giving up that Paul describes next (Romans 1:24, 1:26, 1:28).

Paul’s readers lived in a world that prized philosophy and human reason, and he says that wisdom claimed apart from God ends in folly. Scripture gives the true starting point: “The fear of the LORD is the beginning of knowledge: but fools despise wisdom and instruction” (Proverbs 1:7), and “The fear of the LORD is the beginning of wisdom” (Proverbs 9:10). Jeremiah said of the wise men of his day, “lo, they have rejected the word of the LORD; and what wisdom is in them?” (Jeremiah 8:9). Paul returns to the theme in 1 Corinthians 1: “hath not God made foolish the wisdom of this world?” (1 Corinthians 1:20), and “the foolishness of God is wiser than men” (1 Corinthians 1:25).

What did people exchange for God?

People exchanged God’s glory for images and his truth for a lie. In verse 23 they “changed the glory of the uncorruptible God into an image”. The verb allássō means to make different, to change one thing for another. God’s glory, dóxa, is his majesty, honour and manifest worth, all that calls for awe and worship. He is áphthartos, uncorruptible, undecaying and immortal. In exchange people took “an image” (eikṓn) “made like” (homoíōma) to “corruptible” (phthartós) man, the perishable set in the place of the Imperishable.

The list then goes downward, from man to birds, to fourfooted beasts, to creeping things, from the sky to the land to the ground. Once the Creator is abandoned, worship sinks lower and lower. Paul’s readers saw this all around them in the statues of Jupiter, Mars and Venus, the worship of the emperor, deified heroes and animal cults such as those of Egypt, and in philosophers who scorned the popular gods and still left the true God unworshipped. God had forbidden Israel to make a graven image and bow down to it (Exodus 20:4–5). A psalm says of idols and their makers, “They that make them are like unto them; so is every one that trusteth in them” (Psalm 115:4–8), and Isaiah asks, “To whom then will ye liken God? or what likeness will ye compare unto him?” (Isaiah 40:18–20). Paul pressed the same point at Athens (Acts 17).

In verse 25 they “changed the truth of God into a lie”. The verb here is metallássō, to exchange. The word itself is neutral, and the wrong lies in what was exchanged. A lie, pseûdos, is a falsehood, and the New Testament uses the word of what is opposed to the truth about God. The lie here is the false account of reality that people put in place of what God had shown them, and it ends in idolatry. Isaiah describes the man who burns half his wood for a fire and bows down to the rest: “a deceived heart hath turned him aside, that he cannot deliver his soul, nor say, Is there not a lie in my right hand?” (Isaiah 44:19–20).

So they “worshipped and served the creature more than the Creator”. Worshipped (sebázomai) speaks of religious awe and veneration, and served (latreúō) of religious service. The creature, ktísis, comes from ktízō, to create, and means original formation, either the act of creating or the thing created. The Creator is the one who creates (ktízō), and setting the two words side by side shows how absurd it is to worship what he made. “More than” translates pará, which can compare, preferring one to the other, or oppose, setting one against the other. Israel had been warned against bowing to the sun, moon and stars (Deuteronomy 4:19), and Paul told the Athenians, “we ought not to think that the Godhead is like unto gold, or silver, or stone, graven by art and man’s device” (Acts 17:29).

Then, in the middle of this dark description, Paul stops to bless God: “who is blessed for ever. Amen.” The Creator is eulogētós, worthy of praise, and amēn means truly, so be it. People exchanged his glory, and his glory stands unchanged.

What does this exchange look like today?

The same exchange happens whenever anything God made takes his place in our hearts. Few people today bow to carved birds or beasts, yet wealth, power, status, beauty, intellect, political ideologies, self-image and even relationships can all receive the trust and devotion that belong to God alone. Any created thing that takes that place has become an idol, and it brings the same distortion of truth that the carved images brought.

What does it mean that God gave them up?

It means that God, as judge, handed people over to the path they had chosen, and Paul says so three times: “God also gave them up to uncleanness” (verse 24), “God gave them up unto vile affections” (verse 26), and “God gave them over to a reprobate mind” (verse 28). Each follows one of the people’s own choices. They exchanged God’s glory for images, and “Wherefore” God gave them up. They exchanged his truth for a lie, and “For this cause” he gave them up again. They “did not like to retain God in their knowledge”, and so he gave them over. “Wherefore” translates dió, which marks a result that follows plainly from what came before.

The verb is paradídōmi, to surrender, yield up, hand over or entrust. Here it is a judge’s act. God takes away his restraining hand and lets their desires run their course, and they experience the full, destructive outworking of their rebellion. The giving up is God’s own act of judgment, and its effects come from within the people themselves. Each time the descent goes further, from impurity, to shameful passions, to a mind unable to judge rightly.

The same pattern is found earlier in Scripture. God says of Israel, “So I gave them up unto their own hearts’ lust: and they walked in their own counsels” (Psalm 81:11–12). Wisdom warns those who refuse her that “they shall eat of the fruit of their own way” (Proverbs 1:22–33). Of those who “received not the love of the truth”, Paul writes that “God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie” (2 Thessalonians 2:10–12).

Given up to uncleanness

In verse 24 God gives them up “to uncleanness through the lusts of their own hearts”. Uncleanness, akatharsía, is impurity, chiefly moral impurity, and in Paul’s letters it often covers sexual sin. It comes “through” (en) “the lusts”, epithymía, a word that means desire or longing. It can be used of good desires, and it becomes “lust” by its object, here what God forbids. These desires belong to “their own hearts” (kardía), and the emphatic “own” (autós) shows that they were already there before God gave the people up. The outcome is “to dishonour their own bodies between themselves”. To dishonour, atimázō, is to treat with shame, and the body, sōma, was made for God’s purposes. “Between themselves” renders heautoû, the ordinary pronoun for “themselves” and “one another”, so they dishonoured their bodies with one another.

Israel had been told that the nations defiled the land with such practices, until “the land itself vomiteth out her inhabitants” (Leviticus 18:24–25). Paul describes Gentiles “Who being past feeling have given themselves over unto lasciviousness, to work all uncleanness with greediness” (Ephesians 4:19). He tells believers to possess their bodies “in sanctification and honour; Not in the lust of concupiscence, even as the Gentiles which know not God” (1 Thessalonians 4:3–5).

Does God cause people to sin?

“God gave them up” means that God, as judge, handed people over to desires that were already in their own hearts. He removed the restraint that had held those desires back and let people have the path they had chosen. The sin comes “through the lusts of their own hearts”, so it remains theirs, and God pushes no one into it. At the same time, this is his active judgment, and the recompence people receive is “meet”, just and fitting (verse 27).

What do verses 26 and 27 teach about nature?

They teach that same-sex sexual relations depart from the order God built into creation, and Paul gives them as the example of the second giving up. God gave people up “unto vile affections”. The phrase joins atimía, dishonour or disgrace, with páthos, passion, so it means passions of dishonour, shameful desires. Then the example: “for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature”. The women “did change” (metallássō), the same verb as verse 25. As people exchanged the truth of God for a lie, they exchanged “the natural use” (physikós chrēsis) for what is “against nature” (pará phýsis).

Paul’s standard for nature is God’s created order. In Genesis 1–2 God made humanity male and female and told them, “Be fruitful, and multiply” (Genesis 1:27–28), and a man “shall cleave unto his wife: and they shall be one flesh” (Genesis 2:24). The natural use is sexual union between man and woman as God designed it, and “against nature” refers to same-sex sexual relations. Greek and Roman philosophers debated what nature meant, and some recognised a natural order, but Paul grounds the word in creation as Genesis tells it.

Verse 27 gives the counterpart among men: “And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another”. The verb ekkaíō means to be deeply inflamed, a consuming fire of desire. “Men with men working that which is unseemly”: aschēmosýnē is indecency or shame, behaviour that brings dishonour. Same-sex relations were common in the Roman world, often as pederasty or between free men and slaves, and sometimes in cultic prostitution. Paul’s words take in all of it, since he describes men who left women and burned for one another. The Law had already said, “Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination” (Leviticus 18:22). Jude says that Sodom and Gomorrah, “giving themselves over to fornication, and going after strange flesh, are set forth for an example, suffering the vengeance of eternal fire” (Jude 1:7).

The verse ends, “and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet”. antimisthía means requital, a payment that corresponds to the deed. Their error (plánē) is their straying from God’s truth, which began with idolatry. The recompence is “meet”, fitting and just, and they receive it “in themselves”, because the destructive consequences lie within the sin itself. What looked like pleasure turns out to carry its own penalty.

Are these the worst of all sins?

Paul gives these acts as one vivid and extreme example of what happens when people reject God, and in the next breath he lists envy, murder, strife, deceit, gossip, pride and disobedience to parents (Romans 1:29–31). All unrighteousness is serious in God’s sight. 1 Corinthians 6:9–10 likewise names these acts alongside fornicators, idolaters, thieves, the covetous, drunkards, revilers and extortioners. Paul’s purpose is to show that every one of us has sinned and needs God’s righteousness, which is given freely through Christ (Romans 3:23–26). The wider lesson of these verses is that disordered desires grow from a disordered relationship with God.

What is a reprobate mind?

A reprobate mind is a mind that fails God’s test, and God gives people over to it when they refuse to approve of knowing him. Verse 28 turns on a play on words. “They did not like to retain God in their knowledge”: the verb dokimázō means to test and, by implication, to approve. They put the knowledge of God to the test and refused to approve of keeping it. Knowledge here is epígnōsis, recognition, full discernment and acknowledgement. They chose to push God out of their understanding of the world and out of their moral life. So “God gave them over to a reprobate mind”, and reprobate, adókimos, is the same root with a negative prefix: unapproved, rejected, worthless. They refused to approve God, and God gave them a mind that fails his test, a mind that has lost the ability to tell right from wrong and truth from falsehood by his standard.

That mind leads them “to do those things which are not convenient”. In the KJV “convenient” means fitting, and the Greek (mḗ kathḗkonta) speaks of what is improper, unbecoming or contrary to duty, conduct unfit for people made in God’s image. The phrase is an understatement, since the deeds listed next are destructive and abhorrent.

Is a reprobate mind permanent?

For anyone who turns to Christ in repentance and faith, God promises a renewed mind: “be ye transformed by the renewing of your mind” (Romans 12:2). Believers are “renewed in the spirit of your mind” (Ephesians 4:22–24), and they have “the mind of Christ” (1 Corinthians 2:16). For those who persist in rebellion, being given over is a severe consequence, and the warning is real. The message of the New Testament as a whole is one of hope and of radical change through Christ.

What sins fill a mind given over?

Verses 29 to 31 list what comes from a reprobate mind. Paul begins, “Being filled with all unrighteousness”. The verb plēróō means to fill completely, and the unrighteousness is adikía, the word of verse 18. He goes on with “full of”, mestós, replete. These are people whose whole character is soaked in wrong, so the sins express what they have become. The list moves from sexual sin and greed through hatred and strife to deceit and malicious speech, and on to pride, rebellion and cruelty, until every part of life is touched.

In verse 29:

  • Fornication, porneía, is harlotry and every kind of sexual immorality, including adultery and incest. Figuratively it can stand for idolatry, the unfaithfulness of turning from God.
  • Wickedness, ponēría, is depravity and active malice.
  • Covetousness, pleonexía, is the insatiable desire for more, which leads to greed and exploitation.
  • Maliciousness, kakía, is badness and ill will, the intent to harm.
  • Envy, phthónos, is ill will and jealousy at another’s good.
  • Murder, phónos, is hatred carried to its end.
  • Debate, éris, is quarrelling and wrangling.
  • Deceit, dólos, is trickery and guile.
  • Malignity, kakoḗtheia, is a bad character, ready to put the worst construction on whatever others do.
  • Whisperers, psithyristḗs, are secret slanderers who spread gossip to do harm.

In verse 30:

  • Backbiters speak evil of others behind their backs.
  • Haters of God translates theostygḗs, which joins the word for God to a word for hateful. It can mean “hated by God” or “hating God”. The KJV reads it as hating, and the context of people who have turned against God supports that reading: open hostility toward God himself, the root beneath the rest of the list.
  • Despiteful people are insolent and abusive, ready to humiliate others.
  • The proud are haughty and self-exalting, disdaining others and refusing to depend on God.
  • Boasters brag about themselves, their achievements and their possessions.
  • Inventors of evil things joins epheuretḗs, a contriver or discoverer, with kakós, bad or evil, a word that covers moral evil and what is harmful. These people devise new forms of wickedness with a perverse ingenuity.
  • Disobedient to parents: apeithḗs means unpersuadable and stubborn, refusing to obey, and goneús means a parent. Honouring father and mother is the fifth commandment (Exodus 20:12), and Roman society prized the father’s authority, the patria potestas. This sin strikes at the family, the most basic human bond.

In verse 31:

  • Without understanding, asýnetos, means senseless and foolish, the word used for the darkened heart of verse 21.
  • Covenantbreakers, asýnthetos, are treacherous to agreements, faithless to their promises to God or to people.
  • Without natural affection, ástorgos, means hard-hearted toward one’s own kin, lacking the love that binds parents, children and relatives. In Paul’s world infanticide, the abandonment of children and gladiatorial contests were accepted.
  • Implacable (áspondos) people refuse to be reconciled and hold on to resentment.
  • Unmerciful (aneleḗmōn) people show their neighbours in need neither pity nor kindness, the very opposite of the mercy God pours out.

All five words in verse 31 begin with the Greek negative prefix a-, so they describe people marked by what is missing: understanding, faithfulness, affection, peace and mercy.

Jesus taught that these things come from within (Mark 7:20–23): “For from within, out of the heart of men, proceed evil thoughts, adulteries, fornications, murders” (Mark 7:21–23). Paul gives similar lists of the works of the flesh (Galatians 5:19–21) and of the sins believers must put off (Colossians 3:5–9). He tells Timothy that in the last days “men shall be lovers of their own selves, covetous, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy, Without natural affection” (2 Timothy 3:1–5), and Jesus said that “because iniquity shall abound, the love of many shall wax cold” (Matthew 24:12).

Do these sins belong only to unbelievers?

These sins grow in every human heart, and believers still struggle with them while God makes them holy. The New Testament warns Christians against the works of the flesh (Galatians 5:19–21) and tells them, “Let all bitterness, and wrath, and anger, and clamour, and evil speaking, be put away from you, with all malice: And be ye kind one to another, tenderhearted, forgiving one another” (Ephesians 4:31–32). The difference lies in the Holy Spirit, who produces the opposite: “love, joy, peace, longsuffering, gentleness, goodness, faith, Meekness, temperance” (Galatians 5:22–23). The people of this passage are “filled with all unrighteousness”, and believers are told, “be filled with the Spirit” (Ephesians 5:18).

Why is approving of sin so serious?

Approving of sin in others shows a conscience that knows God’s verdict and has turned it upside down. The passage ends at this lowest point: “Who knowing the judgment of God, that they which commit such things are worthy of death, not only do the same, but have pleasure in them that do them.” The word for knowing, epiginṓskō, means to know fully, to recognise. The judgment is dikaíōma, a righteous ordinance or just decree, here God’s verdict that “such things”, the sins of verses 29 to 31, deserve death, spiritual and eternal. People know this through creation (verses 19 and 20), through conscience, which shows “the work of the law written in their hearts” (Romans 2:14–15), and, in Israel’s case, through the Law. They know, and they go on.

“Have pleasure in them that do them” translates syneudokéō, which joins “with” to “think well of” and means to consent with, approve or take pleasure together. Doing evil while knowing it is wrong is grievous, and applauding it in others makes a person a partner in it and a promoter of it. Scripture speaks of those “Who rejoice to do evil, and delight in the frowardness of the wicked” (Proverbs 2:14). God says to the wicked, “When thou sawest a thief, then thou consentedst with him, and hast been partaker with adulterers” (Psalm 50:18). Paul tells Timothy, “neither be partaker of other men’s sins: keep thyself pure” (1 Timothy 5:22).

This verse also opens the next stage of Paul’s argument. In Romans 2 he speaks of God’s impartial judgment on Jew and Gentile alike, by their deeds and by the light they have received. Through Romans 2:1–3:20 he shows that all are under sin, and in Romans 3 he brings his readers to the righteousness of God that comes through faith.

How does Christ deliver us from this wrath?

Christ delivers us by bearing the wrath of verse 18 himself on the cross. God set him forth “to be a propitiation through faith in his blood” (Romans 3:25), so that his righteous anger is turned from us. “Being now justified by his blood, we shall be saved from wrath through him” (Romans 5:9). Isaiah foresaw it: “he was wounded for our transgressions, he was bruised for our iniquities” (Isaiah 53:5). God “hath made him to be sin for us, who knew no sin; that we might be made the righteousness of God in him” (2 Corinthians 5:21), and Christ “became obedient unto death, even the death of the cross” (Philippians 2:8) to rescue people who were worthy of death. He did it for people like those in this passage, “while we were yet sinners” (Romans 5:8). This is the righteousness of God revealed in the gospel (Romans 3:21–26). Christ is “the Lamb of God, which taketh away the sin of the world” (John 1:29), and he was himself “without sin” (Hebrews 4:15).

Everything people exchanged is found in him. The truth they held down is embodied in Christ, who said, “I am the way, the truth, and the life” (John 14:6). The glory they traded for images shines in him, “the image of the invisible God” (Colossians 1:15), “the brightness of his glory, and the express image of his person” (Hebrews 1:3), in whom “dwelleth all the fulness of the Godhead bodily” (Colossians 2:9). The invisible God to whom creation points has been declared by the Son (John 1:18), the Word who “was made flesh, and dwelt among us... full of grace and truth” (John 1:14). The Creator people refused to worship is the Son, for “All things were made by him” (John 1:3). All things were created by him and for him (Colossians 1:16), and “by him all things consist” (Colossians 1:16–17). In him the Creator entered his creation to redeem those who had been worshipping the creature.

Where people refused to glorify God, Christ said to the Father, “I have glorified thee on the earth” (John 17:4), and he did as the Father commanded (John 14:31). He humbled himself (Philippians 2:5–8), he laid down his life for his friends (John 15:13), he made peace and broke down the wall of hostility (Ephesians 2:14–16), and from the cross he prayed, “Father, forgive them; for they know not what they do” (Luke 23:34). He is the faithful mediator of a better covenant, sealed with his own blood (Hebrews 8:6, Hebrews 9:15). Where human wisdom became folly, Christ is “the power of God, and the wisdom of God” (1 Corinthians 1:24), “made unto us wisdom, and righteousness, and sanctification, and redemption” (1 Corinthians 1:30). Where hearts were darkened, he is “the light of the world” (John 8:12), and God has “shined in our hearts, to give the light of the knowledge of the glory of God in the face of Jesus Christ” (2 Corinthians 4:6). Those who knew God only enough to be guilty can now know him with the knowledge that is eternal life (John 17:3).

He also undoes the giving up. His blood “cleanseth us from all sin” (1 John 1:7), and God promised, “A new heart also will I give you, and a new spirit will I put within you” (Ezekiel 36:26). By the Spirit believers “mortify the deeds of the body” (Romans 8:13) and walk “after the Spirit” (Romans 8:4–5). They reckon themselves dead to sin and alive to God, and they yield their members as instruments of righteousness (Romans 6:11–14). Those who once dishonoured their bodies present them “a living sacrifice, holy, acceptable unto God” (Romans 12:1), knowing that the body is the temple of the Holy Ghost (1 Corinthians 6:19–20). “If any man be in Christ, he is a new creature” (2 Corinthians 5:17). People who exchanged God’s glory are “changed into the same image from glory to glory” (2 Corinthians 3:18), for God’s purpose is that they be “conformed to the image of his Son” (Romans 8:29). And the worship people gave to images is given back to God, as true worshippers “worship the Father in spirit and in truth” (John 4:23–24).

Glorifying God and giving thanks

Verse 21 names what humanity withheld from God: glory and thanks. In Christ these become our calling. “Ye are bought with a price: therefore glorify God in your body, and in your spirit, which are God’s” (1 Corinthians 6:20), and “whatsoever ye do in word or deed, do all in the name of the Lord Jesus, giving thanks to God and the Father by him” (Colossians 3:17). Every sunrise, every living thing and every good gift shows his eternal power and Godhead, and each is a reason to give him the honour and thanks the world keeps back.

The passage also teaches us to watch our own hearts. It is possible to know the truth about God and leave it unheeded, to give some created thing the trust that belongs to him, or to smile at what he calls sin. Our calling is to “Abhor that which is evil; cleave to that which is good” (Romans 12:9), to delight “in the law of the LORD” (Psalm 1:2), and to bring “into captivity every thought to the obedience of Christ” (2 Corinthians 10:5). Christ “died for all, that they which live should not henceforth live unto themselves, but unto him which died for them, and rose again” (2 Corinthians 5:15).

Because the wrath of God is real, the gospel is urgent. The people described in these verses are the people Christ came to save, and the God whose power everyone sees in creation has shown his love at the cross. Those who have received that love have good news to tell.

Last revised

Public-domain commentary

Matthew Henry

From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry wrote on whole passages, and this entry covers Romans 1:19–32. He set out his notes in a four-level outline, kept here as he numbered it.

1662–1714 · 14 verses
Passage under commentRomans 1:19–32
I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points(1.) (2.) Details[1.] [2.] Fine details

In this last part of the chapter the apostle applies what he had said particularly to the Gentile world, in which we may observe,

I.The means and helps they had to come to the knowledge of God.

Though they had not such a knowledge of his law as Jacob and Israel had (Psalm 147:20), yet among them he left not himself without witness (Acts 14:17): For that which may be known, etc., Romans 1:19, Romans 1:20. Observe,

1.What discoveries they had: That which may be known of God is manifest, en autois - among them; that is, there were some even among them that had the knowledge of God, were convinced of the existence of one supreme Numen. The philosophy of Pythagoras, Plato, and the Stoics, discovered a great deal of the knowledge of God, as appears by abundance of testimonies. That which may be known, which implies that there is a great deal which may not be known. The being of God may be apprehended, but cannot be comprehended. We cannot by searching find him out, Job 11:7-9. Finite understandings cannot perfectly know an infinite being; but, blessed be God, there is that which may be known, enough to lead us to our chief end, the glorifying and enjoying of him; and these things revealed belong to us and to our children, while secret things are not to be pried into, Deuteronomy 29:29.

2.Whence they had these discoveries: God hath shown it to them. Those common natural notions which they had of God were imprinted upon their hearts by the God of nature himself, who is the Father of lights. This sense of a Deity, and a regard to that Deity, are so connate with the human nature that some think we are to distinguish men from brutes by these rather than by reason.

3.By what way and means these discoveries and notices which they had were confirmed and improved, namely, by the work of creation (Romans 1:20); For the invisible things of God, etc.

(1.)Observe what they knew: The invisible things of him, even his eternal power and Godhead. Though God be not the object of sense, yet he hath discovered and made known himself by those things that are sensible. The power and Godhead of God are invisible things, and yet are clearly seen in their products. He works in secret (Job 23:8, Job 23:9; Psalm 139:15; Ecclesiastes 11:5), but manifests what he has wrought, and therein makes known his power and Godhead, and others of his attributes which natural light apprehends in the idea of a God. They could not come by natural light to the knowledge of the three persons in the Godhead (though some fancy they have found footsteps of this in Plato's writings), but they did come to the knowledge of the Godhead, at least so much knowledge as was sufficient to have kept them from idolatry. This was that truth which they held in unrighteousness.

(2.)How they knew it: By the things that are made, which could not make themselves, nor fall into such an exact order and harmony by any casual hits; and therefore must have been produced by some first cause or intelligent agent, which first cause could be no other than an eternal powerful God. See Psalm 19:1; Isaiah 40:26; Acts 17:24. The workman is known by his work. The variety, multitude, order, beauty, harmony, different nature, and excellent contrivance, of the things that are made, the direction of them to certain ends, and the concurrence of all the parts to the good and beauty of the whole, do abundantly prove a Creator and his eternal power and Godhead. Thus did the light shine in the darkness. And this from the creation of the world. Understand it either,

[1.]As the topic from which the knowledge of them is drawn. To evince this truth, we have recourse to the great work of creation. And some think this ktisis kosmou, this creature of the world (as it may be read), is to be understood of man, the ktisis kat' exochēn - the most remarkable creature of the lower world, called ktisis, Mark 16:15. The frame and structure of human bodies, and especially the most excellent powers, faculties, and capacities of human souls, do abundantly prove that there is a Creator, and that he is God. Or,

[2.]As the date of the discovery. It as old as the creation of the world. In this sense apo ktiseōs is most frequently used in scripture. These notices concerning God are not any modern discoveries, hit upon of late, but ancient truths, which were from the beginning. The way of the acknowledgement of God is a good old way; it was from the beginning. Truth got the start of error.

II.Their gross idolatry, notwithstanding these discoveries that God made to them of himself; described here, Romans 1:21-23, Romans 1:25.

We shall the less wonder at the inefficacy of these natural discoveries to prevent the idolatry of the Gentiles if we remember how prone even the Jews, who had scripture light to guide them, were to idolatry; so miserably are the degenerate sons of men plunged in the mire of sense. Observe,

1.The inward cause of their idolatry, Romans 1:21, Romans 1:22. They are therefore without excuse, in that they did know God, and from what they knew might easily infer that it was their duty to worship him, and him only. Though some have greater light and means of knowledge than others, yet all have enough to leave them inexcusable. But the mischief of it was that,

(1.)They glorified him not as God. Their affections towards him, and their awe and adoration of him, did not keep pace with their knowledge. To glorify him as God is to glorify him only; for there can be but one infinite: but they did not so glorify him, for they set up a multitude of other deities. To glorify him as God is to worship him with spiritual worship; but they made images of him. Not to glorify God as God is in effect not to glorify him at all; to respect him as a creature is not to glorify him, but to dishonour him.

(2.)Neither were they thankful; not thankful for the favours in general they received from God (insensibleness of God's mercies is at the bottom of our sinful departures from him); not thankful in particular for the discoveries God was pleased to make of himself to them. Those that do not improve the means of knowledge and grace are justly reckoned unthankful for them.

(3.)But they became vain in their imaginations, en tois dialogismois - in their reasonings, in their practical inferences. They had a great deal of knowledge of general truths (Romans 1:19), but no prudence to apply them to particular cases. Or, in their notions of God, and the creation of the world, and the origination of mankind, and the chief good; in these things, when they quitted the plain truth, they soon disputed themselves into a thousand vain and foolish fancies. The several opinions and hypotheses of the various sects of philosophers concerning these things were so many vain imaginations. When truth is forsaken, errors multiply in infinitum - infinitely.

(4.)And their foolish heart was darkened. The foolishness and practical wickedness of the heart cloud and darken the intellectual powers and faculties. Nothing tends more to the blinding and perverting of the understanding than the corruption and depravedness of the will and affections.

(5.)Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools, Romans 1:22. This looks black upon the philosophers, the pretenders to wisdom and professors of it. Those that had the most luxuriant fancy, in framing to themselves the idea of a God, fell into the most gross and absurd conceits: and it was the just punishment of their pride and self-conceitedness. It has been observed that the most refined nations, that made the greatest show of wisdom, were the arrantest fools in religion. The barbarians adored the sun and moon, which of all others was the most specious idolatry; while the learned Egyptians worshipped an ox and an onion. The Grecians, who excelled them in wisdom, adored diseases and human passions. The Romans, the wisest of all, worshipped the furies. And at this day the poor Americans worship the thunder; while the ingenious Chinese adore the devil. Thus the world by wisdom knew not God, 1 Corinthians 1:21. As a profession of wisdom is an aggravation of folly, so a proud conceit of wisdom is the cause of a great deal of folly. Hence we read of few philosophers who were converted to Christianity; and Paul's preaching was no where so laughed at and ridiculed as among the learned Athenians, Acts 17:18-32. Phaskontes einai - conceiting themselves to be wise. The plain truth of the being of God would not content them; they thought themselves above that, and so fell into the greatest errors.

2.The outward acts of their idolatry, Romans 1:23-25.

(1.)Making images of God (Romans 1:23), by which, as much as in them lay, they changed the glory of the incorruptible God. Compare Psalm 106:20; Jeremiah 2:11. They ascribed a deity to the most contemptible creatures, and by them represented God. It was the greatest honour God did to man that he made man in the image of God; but it is the greatest dishonour man has done to God that he has made God in the image of man. This was what God so strictly warned the Jews against, Deuteronomy 4:15, etc. This the apostle shows the folly of in his sermon at Athens, Acts 17:29. See Isaiah 40:18, etc.; Isaiah 44:10, etc. This is called (Romans 1:25) changing the truth of God into a lie. As it did dishonour his glory, so it did misrepresent his being. Idols are called lies, for they belie God, as if he had a body, whereas he is a Spirit, Jeremiah 23:14; Hosea 7:1. Teachers of lies, Habakkuk 2:18.

(2.)Giving divine honour to the creature: Worshipped and served the creature, para ton ktisanta - besides the Creator. They did own a supreme Numen in their profession, but they did in effect disown him by the worship they paid to the creature; for God will be all or none. Or, above the Creator, paying more devout respect to their inferior deities, stars, heroes, demons, thinking the supreme God inaccessible, or above their worship. The sin itself was their worshipping the creature at all; but this is mentioned as an aggravation of the sin, that they worshipped the creature more than the Creator. This was the general wickedness of the Gentile world, and became twisted in with their laws and government; in compliance with which even the wise men among them, who knew and owned a supreme God and were convinced of the nonsense and absurdity of their polytheism and idolatry, yet did as the rest of their neighbours did. Seneca, in his book De Superstitione, as it is quoted by Aug. de Civit. Dei, lib. 6, cap. 10 (for the book itself is lost), after he had largely shown the great folly and impiety of the vulgar religion, in divers instances of it, yet concludes, Quae omnia sapiens servabit tanquam legibus jussa, non tanquam diis grata - All which a wise man will observe as established by law, not imagining them grateful to the gods. And afterwards, Omnem istam ignobilem deorum turbam, quam longo aevo longa superstitio congessit, sic adorabimus, ut meminerimus cultum ejus magis ad morem quam ad rem pertinere - All this ignoble rout of gods, which ancient superstition has amassed together by long prescription, we will so adore as to remember that the worship of them is rather a compliance with custom than material in itself. Upon which Augustine observes, Colebat quod reprehendebat, agebat quod arguebat, quod culpabat adorabat - He worshipped that which he censured, he did that which he had proved wrong, and he adored what he found fault with. I mention this thus largely because methinks it doth fully explain that of the apostle here (Romans 1:18): Who hold the truth in unrighteousness. It is observable that upon the mention of the dishonour done to God by the idolatry of the Gentiles the apostle, in the midst of his discourse, expresses himself in an awful adoration of God: Who is blessed for ever. Amen. When we see or hear of any contempt cast upon God or his name, we should thence take occasion to think and speak highly and honourably of him. In this, as in other things, the worse others are, the better we should be. Blessed for ever, notwithstanding these dishonours done to his name: though there are those that do not glorify him, yet he is glorified, and will be glorified to eternity.

III.The judgments of God upon them for this idolatry; not many temporal judgments (the idolatrous nations were the conquering ruling nations of the world), but spiritual judgments, giving them up to the most brutish and unnatural lusts. Paredōken autous - He gave them up; it is thrice repeated here, Romans 1:24, Romans 1:26, Romans 1:28. Spiritual judgments are of all judgments the sorest, and to be most dreaded. Observe,

1.By whom they were given up. God gave them up, in a way of righteous judgment, as the just punishment of their idolatry - taking off the bridle of restraining grace - leaving them to themselves - letting them alone; for his grace is his own, he is debtor to no man, he may give or withhold his grace at pleasure. Whether this giving up be a positive act of God or only privative we leave to the schools to dispute: but this we are sure of that it is no new thing for God to give men up to their own hearts' lusts, to send them strong delusions, to let Satan loose upon them, nay, to lay stumbling-blocks before them. And yet God is not the author of sin, but herein infinitely just and holy; for, though the greatest wickedness follow upon this giving up, the fault of that is to be laid upon the sinner's wicked heart. If the patient be obstinate, and will not submit to the methods prescribed, but wilfully takes and does that which is prejudicial to him, the physician is not to be blamed if he give him up as in a desperate condition; and all the fatal symptoms that follow are not to be imputed to the physician, but to the disease itself and to the folly and wilfulness of the patient.

2.To what they were given up.

(1.)To uncleanness and vile affections, Romans 1:24, Romans 1:26, Romans 1:27. Those that would not entertain the more pure and refined notices of natural light, which tend to preserve the honour of God, justly forfeited those more gross and palpable sentiments which preserve the honour of human nature. Man being in honour, and refusing to understand the God that made him, thus becomes worse than the beasts that perish, Psalm 49:20. Thus one, by the divine permission, becomes the punishment of another; but it is (as it said here) through the lusts of their own hearts - there all the fault is to be laid. Those who dishonoured God were given up to dishonour themselves. A man cannot be delivered up to a greater slavery than to be given up to his own lusts. Such are given over, like the Egyptians (Isaiah 19:4), into the hand of a cruel lord. The particular instances of their uncleanness and vile affections are their unnatural lusts, for which many of the heathen, even of those among them who passed for wise men, as Solon and Zeno, were infamous, against the plainest and most obvious dictates of natural light. The crying iniquity of Sodom and Gomorrah, for which God rained hell from heaven upon them, became not only commonly practised, but avowed, in the pagan nations. Perhaps the apostle especially refers to the abominations that were committed in the worship of their idol-gods, in which the worst of uncleannesses were prescribed for the honour of their gods; dunghill service for dunghill gods: the unclean spirits delight in such ministrations. In the church of Rome, where the pagan idolatries are revived, images worshipped, and saints only substituted in the room of demons, we hear of these same abominations going barefaced, licensed by the pope (Fox's Acts and Monuments, vol. 1, p. 808), and not only commonly perpetrated, but justified and pleaded for by some of their cardinals: the same spiritual plagues for the same spiritual wickednesses. See what wickedness there is in the nature of man. How abominable and filthy is man! Lord, what is man? says David; what a vile creature is he when left to himself! How much are we beholden to the restraining grace of God for the preserving any thing of the honour and decency of the human nature! For, were it not for this, man, who was made but little lower than the angels, would make himself a great deal lower than the devils. This is said to be that recompence of their error which was meet. The Judge of all the earth does right, and observes a meetness between the sin and the punishment of it.

(2.)To a reprobate mind in these abominations, Romans 1:28.

[1.]They did not like to retain God in their knowledge. The blindness of their understandings was caused by the wilful aversion of their wills and affections. They did not retain God in their knowledge, because they did not like it. They would neither know nor do any thing but just what pleased themselves. It is just the temper of carnal hearts; the pleasing of themselves is their highest end. There are many that have God in their knowledge, they cannot help it, the light shines so fully in their faces; but they do not retain him there. They say to the Almighty, Depart (Job 21:14), and they therefore do not retain God in their knowledge because it thwarts and contradicts their lusts; they do not like it. In their knowledge - en epignōsei. There is a difference between gnōsis and epignōsis, the knowledge and the acknowledgement of God; the pagans knew God, but did not, would not, acknowledge him.

[2.]Answerable to this wilfulness of theirs, in gainsaying the truth, God gave them over to a wilfulness in the grossest sins, here called a reprobate mind - eis adokimon noun, a mind void of all sense and judgment to discern things that differ, so that they could not distinguish their right hand from their left in spiritual things. See whither a course of sin leads, and into what a gulf it plunges the sinner at last; hither fleshly lusts have a direct tendency. Eyes full of adultery cannot cease from sin, 2 Peter 2:14. This reprobate mind was a blind scared conscience, past feeling, Ephesians 4:19. When the judgment is once reconciled to sin, the man is in the suburbs of hell. At first Pharaoh hardened his heart, but afterwards God hardened Pharaoh's heart. Thus wilful hardness is justly punished with judicial hardness. - To do those things which are not convenient. This phrase may seem to bespeak a diminutive evil, but here it is expressive of the grossest enormities; things that are not agreeable to men, but contradict the very light and law of nature. And here he subjoins a black list of those unbecoming things which the Gentiles were guilty of, being delivered up to a reprobate mind. No wickedness so heinous, so contrary to the light of nature, to the law of nations, and to all the interests of mankind, but a reprobate mind will comply with it. By the histories of those times, especially the accounts we have of the then prevailing dispositions and practices of the Romans when the ancient virtue of that commonwealth was so degenerated, it appears that these sins here mentioned were then and there reigning national sins. No fewer than twenty-three several sorts of sins and sinners are here specified, Romans 1:29-31. Here the devil's seat is; his name is legion, for they are many. It was time to have the gospel preached among them, for the world had need of reformation.

First, Sins against the first table: Haters of God. Here is the devil in his own colours, sin appearing sin. Could it be imagined that rational creatures should hate the chief good, and depending creatures abhor the fountain of their being? And yet so it is. Every sin has in it a hatred of God; but some sinners are more open and avowed enemies to him than others, Zechariah 11:8. Proud men and boasters cope with God himself, and put those crowns upon their own heads which must be cast before his throne.

Secondly, Sins against the second table. These are especially mentioned, because in these things they had a clearer light. In general here is a charge of unrighteousness. This is put first, for every sin is unrighteousness; it is withholding that which is due, perverting that which is right; it is especially put for second-table sins, doing as we would not be done by. Against the fifth commandment: Disobedient to parents, and without natural affection - astorgous, that is parents unkind and cruel to their children. Thus, when duty fails on one side, it commonly fails on the other. Disobedient children are justly punished with unnatural parents; and, on the contrary, unnatural parents with disobedient children. Against the sixth commandment: Wickedness (doing mischief for mischief's sake), maliciousness, envy, murder, debate (eridos - contention), malignity, despiteful, implacable, unmerciful; all expressions of that hatred of our brother which is heart-murder. Against the seventh commandment: Fornication; he mentions no more, having spoken before of other uncleannesses. Against the eighth commandment: Unrighteousness, covetousness. Against the ninth commandment: Deceit, whisperers, back-biters, covenant-breakers, lying and slandering. Here are two generals not before mentioned - inventors of evil things, and without understanding; wise to do evil, and yet having no knowledge to do good. The more deliberate and politic sinners are in inventing evil things, the greater is their sin: so quick of invention in sin, and yet without understanding (stark fools) in the thoughts of God. Here is enough to humble us all, in the sense of our original corruption; for every heart by nature has in it the seed and spawn of all these sins. In the close he mentions the aggravations of the sins, Romans 1:32. 1. They knew the judgment of God; that is, (1.) They knew the law. The judgment of God is that which his justice requires, which, because he is just, he judgeth meet to be done. (2.) They knew the penalty; so it is explained here: They knew that those who commit such things were worthy of death, eternal death; their own consciences could not but suggest this to them, and yet they ventured upon it. It is a great aggravation of sin when it is committed against knowledge (James 4:17), especially against the knowledge of the judgment of God. It is daring presumption to run upon the sword's point. It argues the heart much hardened, and very resolutely set upon sin. 2. They not only do the same, but have pleasure in those that do them. The violence of some present temptation may hurry a man into the commission of such sins himself in which the vitiated appetite may take a pleasure; but to be pleased with other people's sins is to love sin for sin's sake: it is joining in a confederacy for the devil's kingdom and interest. Suneudokousi: they do not only commit sin, but they defend and justify it, and encourage others to do the like. Our own sins are much aggravated by our concurrence with, and complacency in, the sins of others.

Now lay all this together, and then say whether the Gentile world, lying under so much guilt and corruption, could be justified before God by any works of their own.

Historical interpretation

Two Centuries of Reception

7 surviving comments on this verse. Each one is dated, so this reads as a timeline rather than a list.

7 quotes · AD 253–430
Ante-NicenePost-Nicene
300400

Select a marker to jump to its quote. Markers stagger vertically where authors wrote within a few decades of each other.

We ought not to overlook this passage. The apostle is not merely complaining about those who worship idols, but he should also be understood to be refuting the Anthropomorphites, who are found inside the church, who say that the bodily image of man is as such the image of God, ignoring the fact that it is written in Genesis that the whole person is created in the image of God, which must be understood as it is interpreted by the apostle, when he said: “You have put off the old man with his behavior and you have put on the new man, which is created according to God.” … Elsewhere Paul calls this the “inner man” and regards the corrupt bodily image as the “outer man.” … The mistake of those who think that it is this outer man which is the image of God is therefore obvious.
d. AD 253Origen of AlexandriaAnte-NiceneSourceON PRAYER 29.15
These people have lowered to a body without soul or sense the identity of the One who gives to all sentient and rational beings not only the power of sentience but also of sensing rationally, and to some even the power of sensing and thinking perfectly and virtuously.
d. AD 384AmbrosiasterPost-NiceneSourceCOMMENTARY ON PAUL’S EPISTLES
So blinded were their hearts that they altered the majesty of the invisible God, which they knew from the things which he had made, not into men but, what is worse and is an inexcusable offense, into the image of men, so that the form of a corruptible man was called a god by them, i.e., a depiction of a man. Moreover, they did not dare honor living people with this name but elevated the images of dead men to the glory of God! What great idiocy, what great stupidity, in that they knew they were calling them to their damnation, among whom an image was more powerful than the truth, and the dead were mightier than the living! Turning away from the living God they preferred dead men, among whose number they found themselves.They so diminished the majesty and glory of God that they gave the title of “god” to the images of things which were small and tiny. For the Babylonians were the first to deify a notion of Bel, who was portrayed as a dead man, who supposedly had once been one of their kings. They also worshiped the dragon serpent, which Daniel the man of God killed and of which they had an image. The Egyptians also worshiped a quadruped which they called Apis and which was in the form of a bull. Jeroboam copied this evil by setting up calves in Samaria, to which the Jews were expected to offer sacrifices. … By doing this, those who knew the invisible God did not honor him. They were unable to be wise in the things which are visible. For one who has problems with the big things will not be wise in the little things either.
d. AD 390Gregory of NazianzusPost-NiceneSourceORATION 28: ON GOD 28.15
People like this make it hard to tell which was the more contemptible, the worshipers or the worshiped. Perhaps the worshipers by far, since as rational beings and recipients of God’s grace, they chose their inferior for patron and better.
d. AD 407John ChrysostomPost-NiceneSourceHomily on Romans 3
The first charge is, that they did not find God; the second was, that it was while they had great and clear (wise) means to do it; the third, that withal they said they were wise; the fourth, that they not only did not find that Reverend Being, but even lowered Him to devils and to stones and stocks. Now he takes down their haughtiness also in the Epistle to the Corinthians, but not in the same way there as here. For there it is from the Cross he gives them the blow, saying, "The foolishness of God is wiser than men." (1 Cor. i. 25.) But here, without any comparison, he holds their wisdom by itself up to ridicule, showing it to be folly and a mere display of vain boasting. Then, that you may learn that when they had the knowledge of God they gave it up thus treacherously, "they changed," he says. Now he that changeth, hath something to change. For they wished to find out more, and not bear with the limits given them, and so they were banished from these also. For they were lusters after new devices, for such is all that is Grecian. And this is why they stood against one another and Aristotle rose up against Plato, and the Stoics blustered against him, and one has become hostile to one, another to another. So that one should not so much marvel at them for their wisdom, as turn away from them indignant and hate them, because through this very thing they have become fools. For had they not trusted what they have to reasonings, and syllogisms, and sophistries, they would not have suffered what they did suffer. Then, to strengthen the accusation against them he holds the whole of their idolatry up to ridicule. For in the first place the changing even were a very fit subject of scorn. But to change to such things too, is beyond all excuse. For what then did they change it, and what was it which they invested with His Glory? Some conceptions they ought to have had about Him, as, for instance, that He is God, that He is Lord of all, that He made them, which were not, that He exerciseth a Providence, that He careth for them. For these things are the "Glory of God." To whom then did they ascribe it? Not even to men, but "to an image made like to corruptible man." Neither did they stop here, but even dropped down to the brutes, or rather to the images of these. But consider, I pray, the wisdom of Paul, how he has taken the two extremes, God the Highest, and creeping things the lowest: or rather, not the creeping things, but the images of these; that he might clearly show their evident madness. For what knowledge they ought to have had concerning Him Who is incomparably more excellent than all, with that they invested what was incomparably more worthless than all. But what has this to do with the philosophers? a man may say. To these belongs most of all what I have said to do with them. For they have the Egyptians who were the inventors of these things to their masters. And Plato, who is thought more reverend than the rest of them, glories in these masters. And his master is in a stupid awe of these idols, for he it is that bids them sacrifice the cock to Aesculapius where (i.e. in his temple) are the images of these beasts, and creeping things. And one may see Apollo and Bacchus worshipped along with these creeping things. And some of the philosophers even lifted up to Heaven bulls, and scorpions, and dragons, and all the rest of that vanity. For in all parts did the devil zealously strive to bring men down before the images of creeping things, and to range beneath the most senseless of all things, him whom God hath willed to lift up above the heavens. And it is not from this only, but also from other grounds, that you will see their chief man to come under the remarks now made. For having made a collection of the poets, and having said that we should believe them upon matters relating to God, as having accurate knowledge, he has nothing else to bring forward but the "linked sweetness" of these absurdities, and then says, that this utterly ludicrous trifling is to be held for true.
d. AD 418PelagiusPost-NiceneSourcePELAGIUS’S COMMENTARY ON ROMANS
They did not understand that there is no similarity between the mortal and the immortal, the corruptible and the eternal.… Here Paul addresses the worshipers of Jupiter, who maintain that he was transformed into the likeness of animals and therefore dedicate to him images of the kind in which he satisfied his sexual desire.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.

Continue studying Romans 1:23 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.

Related study articles8