Skip to content
1 Corinthians 14:34-36

Instructions for Women in the Assembly

1 Corinthians 14:34-36

Instructions for Women in the Assembly

34
let your wives keep silent in the assemblies, for it has not been permitted for them to speak; but let them be in subjection, as the Torah also says.​
35
If they desire to learn anything, let them ask their own husbands at home, for it is shameful for a woman to chatter in the assembly.​
36
What? Was it from you that the word of God went out? Or did it come to you alone?​

Study this passage

Commentary written on this passage, not on a single verse.

Where else Scripture says this.

  • 1 Timothy 2:11

    Let a woman learn in quietness with all subjection.
    from verse 34
  • 1 Timothy 2:12

    But I don’t permit a woman to teach, nor to exercise authority over a man, but to be in quietness.
    from verse 34
  • Genesis 3:16

    To the woman he said, “I will greatly multiply your pain in childbirth. In pain you will bear children. Your desire will be for your husband, and he will rule over you.”
    from verse 34
  • Numbers 30:3

    “Also when a woman vows a vow to the LORD, and binds herself by a bond, being in her father’s house, in her youth,
    from verse 34
  • Numbers 30:13

    Every vow, and every binding oath to afflict the soul, her husband may establish it, or her husband may make it void.
    from verse 34
  • Colossians 3:18

    Wives, be in subjection to your husbands, as is fitting in the Lord.
    from verse 34
  • 1 Corinthians 14:35

    If they desire to learn anything, let them ask their own husbands at home, for it is shameful for a woman to chatter in the assembly.
    from verse 34
  • 1 Corinthians 11:5

    But every woman praying or prophesying with her head unveiled dishonors her head. For it is one and the same thing as if she were shaved.
    from verse 34
  • Titus 2:5

    to be sober minded, chaste, workers at home, kind, being in subjection to their own husbands, that God’s word may not be blasphemed.
    from verse 34
  • 1 Corinthians 11:3

    But I would have you know that the head of every man is Messiah, and the head of the woman is the man, and the head of Messiah is God.
    from verse 34
  • Ephesians 5:22

    Wives, be subject to your own husbands, as to the Lord.
    from verse 34
  • Ephesians 5:24

    But as the assembly is subject to Messiah, so let the wives also be to their own husbands in everything.
    from verse 34

Public-domain commentary

Matthew Henry

From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry comments on passages, not single verses — this entry covers 1 Corinthians 14:34–35.

1662–1714

Here the apostle, 1. Enjoins silence on their women in public assemblies, and to such a degree that they must not ask questions for their own information in the church, but ask their husbands at home. They are to learn in silence with all subjection; but, says the apostle, I suffer them not to teach, Ti1 2:11, Ti1 2:12. There is indeed an intimation (Co1 11:5) as if the women sometimes did pray and prophecy in their assemblies, which the apostle, in that passage, does not simply condemn, but the manner of performance, that is, praying or prophesying with the head uncovered, which, in that age and country, was throwing off the distinction of sexes, and setting themselves on a level with the men. But here he seems to forbid all public performances of theirs. They are not permitted to speak (Co1 14:34) in the church, neither in praying nor prophesying. The connection seems plainly to include the latter, in the limited sense in which it is taken in this chapter, namely, for preaching, or interpreting scripture by inspiration. And, indeed, for a woman to prophesy in this sense were to teach, which does not so well befit her state of subjection. A teacher of others has in that respect a superiority over them, which is not allowed the woman over the man, nor must she therefore be allowed to teach in a congregation: I suffer them not to teach. But praying, and uttering hymns inspired, were not teaching. And seeing there were women who had spiritual gifts of this sort in that age of the church (see Act 22:9), and might be under this impulse in the assembly, must they altogether suppress it? Or why should they have this gift, if it must never be publicly exercised? For these reasons, some think that these general prohibitions are only to be understood in common cases; but that upon extraordinary occasions, when women were under a divine afflatus, and known to be so, they might have liberty of speech. They were not ordinarily to teach, nor so much as to debate and ask questions in the church, but learn in silence there; and, if difficulties occurred, ask their own husbands at home. Note, As it is the woman's duty to learn in subjection, it is the man's duty to keep up his superiority, by being able to instruct her; if it be her duty to ask her husband at home, it is his concern and duty to endeavour at lest to be able to answer her enquiries; if it be a shame for her to speak in the church, where she should be silent, it is a shame for him to be silent when he should speak, and not be able to give an answer, when she asks him at home. 2. We have here the reason of this injunction: It is God's law and commandment that they should be under obedience (Co1 14:34); they are placed in subordination to the man, and it is a shame for them to do any thing that looks like an affectation of changing ranks, which speaking in public seemed to imply, at least in that age, and among that people, as would public teaching much more: so that the apostle concludes it was a shame for women to speak in the church, in the assembly. Shame is the mind's uneasy reflection on having done an indecent thing. And what more indecent than for a woman to quit her rank, renounce the subordination of her sex, or do what in common account had such aspect and appearance? Note, Our spirit and conduct should be suitable to our rank. The natural distinctions God has made, we should observe. Those he has placed in subjection to others should not set themselves on a level, nor affect or assume superiority. The woman was made subject to the man, and she should keep her station and be content with it. For this reason women must be silent in the churches, not set up for teachers; for this is setting up for superiority over the man.

Historical interpretation

Two Centuries of Reception

17 surviving comments on this passage. Each one is dated, so this reads as a timeline rather than a list.

17 quotes · AD 220–407
Ante-NicenePost-Nicene
200300400

Select a marker to jump to its quote. Markers stagger vertically where authors wrote within a few decades of each other.

The virgins of men go about, in opposition to the virgins of God, with front quite bare, excited to a rash audacity; and the semblance of virgins is exhibited by women who have the power of asking somewhat from husbands, not to say such a request as that (forsooth) their rivals-all the more "free" in that they are the "hand-maids" of Christ alone -may be surrendered to them. "We are scandalized," they say, "because others walk otherwise (than we do); "and they prefer being "scandalized" to being provoked (to modesty).
It is not permitted to a woman to speak in the church; but neither (is it permitted her) to teach, nor to baptize, nor to offer, nor to claim to herself a lot in any manly function, not to say (in any) sacerdotal office.
AD 220TertullianAnte-NiceneSourceOn Baptism
For how credible would it seem, that he who has not permitted a woman even to learn with over-boldness, should give a female the power of teaching and of baptizing! "Let them be silent," he says, "and at home consult their own husbands."
AD 220TertullianAnte-NiceneSourceAgainst Marcion Book V
In precisely the same manner, when enjoining on women silence in the church, that they speak not for the mere sake of learning (although that even they have the right of prophesying, he has already shown when he covers the woman that prophesies with a veil), he goes to the law for his sanction that woman should be under obedience. Now this law, let me say once for all, he ought to have made no other acquaintance with, than to destroy it.
AD 253Origen of AlexandriaAnte-NiceneSourceCOMMENTARY ON 1 CORINTHIANS 4.74.6-16
If this was the case, what are we to make of the fact that Philip had four daughters who prophesied? If they could do it, why can we not let our own prophetesses speak? We may answer this question as follows. First, if our prophetesses have spoken, show us the signs of prophecy in them. Second, even if the daughters of Philip did prophesy, they did not do so inside the church. Likewise in the Old Testament, although Deborah was reputed to be a prophetess, there is no indication that she ever corporately addressed the people in the way that Isaiah or Jeremiah did. The same is true of Huldah..
Settings

Reading Style

Typeface

Font Size 19px

Options