Numbers 36:3

Translation
King James Version
And if they be married to any of the sons of the other tribes of the children of Israel, then shall their inheritance be taken from the inheritance of our fathers, and shall be put to the inheritance of the tribe whereunto they are received: so shall it be taken from the lot of our inheritance.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
And if they be married H802 to any H259 of the sons H1121 of the other tribes H7626 of the children H1121 of Israel H3478, then shall their inheritance H5159 be taken H1639 from the inheritance H5159 of our fathers H1, and shall be put H3254 to the inheritance H5159 of the tribe H4294 whereunto they are received: so shall it be taken H1639 from the lot H1486 of our inheritance H5159.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
But if they get married to anyone belonging to another of the tribes of the people of Isra'el, then their inheritance will be taken away from the inheritance of our ancestors and be added to the inheritance of the tribe they will then belong to; thus it will be taken away from the sum total of our inheritance.
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
But if they marry any of the men from the other tribes of Israel, their inheritance will be withdrawn from the portion of our fathers and added to the tribe into which they marry. So our allotted inheritance would be taken away.
Ask
American Standard Version
And if they be married to any of the sons of the other tribes of the children of Israel, then will their inheritance be taken away from the inheritance of our fathers, and will be added to the inheritance of the tribe whereunto they shall belong: so will it be taken away from the lot of our inheritance.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
If they are married to any of the sons of the other tribes of the children of Israel, then will their inheritance be taken away from the inheritance of our fathers, and will be added to the inheritance of the tribe to which they shall belong. So will it be taken away from the lot of our inheritance.
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
If they bee married to any of the sonnes of the other tribes of the children of Israel, then shall their inheritance be taken away from the inheritance of our fathers, and shalbe put vnto the inheritance of the tribe whereof they shalbe: so shall it be taken away from the lot of our inheritance.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
`And--they have been to one of the sons of the other tribes of the sons of Israel for wives, and their inheritance hath been withdrawn from the inheritance of our fathers, and hath been added to the inheritance of the tribe which is theirs, and from the lot of our inheritance it is withdrawn,
Ask
In the KJVVerse 4,883 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

Numbers 36:3 addresses a crucial legal provision concerning land inheritance within ancient Israel, specifically for daughters who inherited land in the absence of sons. This verse stipulates that if such daughters married outside their ancestral tribe, their inherited land would transfer to the tribe of their husbands, thereby diminishing the original tribe's allotted portion. The law was designed to prevent the fragmentation and redistribution of tribal territories, ensuring the perpetual preservation of the divinely ordained land boundaries established for each of the twelve tribes of Israel.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: Numbers 36:3 is situated within the final chapters of the book of Numbers, which detail the preparations for Israel's entry into the Promised Land, including the meticulous division of the land among the tribes. This specific verse directly follows the unique case of Zelophehad's daughters, who, in an unprecedented ruling, were granted the right to inherit their father's land because he had no sons. The elders of the tribe of Manasseh, to which Zelophehad belonged, subsequently raised a critical concern in Numbers 36:1-2: if these daughters married men from other Israelite tribes, their inheritance would eventually transfer to their husbands' tribes during the Jubilee, thereby diminishing the portion allotted to Manasseh and disrupting the divinely established tribal boundaries. Numbers 36:3 therefore outlines the legal consequence of such a marriage, providing a solution to preserve the integrity of tribal land. The broader context of Numbers 36 provides a comprehensive legal framework for the long-term stability of the land distribution.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: In ancient Israel, land was far more than mere property; it was intrinsically linked to tribal identity, economic stability, and covenantal blessing. The allocation of land by lot, as described in Numbers 26:52-56, was considered a direct act of divine providence, establishing sacred and perpetual boundaries for each tribe. Losing ancestral land meant losing a part of one's heritage, tribal standing, and connection to the covenant promises. Marriage, particularly for women, often determined tribal affiliation for their offspring and, consequently, the lineage of property. This verse highlights the significant socio-economic implications of marriage in Israelite society, demonstrating how personal unions had broader communal consequences for land distribution and the preservation of the divinely ordered tribal structure.
  • Key Themes: The primary theme underscored by this law is the Preservation of Tribal Inheritance. God had meticulously divided the land by lot among the twelve tribes, and these boundaries were considered sacred and perpetual. The transfer of land between tribes was seen as a violation of this divine order, which was crucial for maintaining the distinct identity and economic viability of each tribal unit. This concern ties into the broader theme of Land and Identity, where the physical possession of ancestral land was foundational to the Israelites' sense of belonging and their covenant relationship with God. Furthermore, the ruling reflects God's concern for Divine Order and Justice. While seemingly restrictive, the law balanced the innovative right of women to inherit property (a progressive move for its time, as seen in Numbers 27:7) with the overarching communal need to preserve established tribal boundaries. This showcases God's wisdom in establishing laws that promote order, prevent disputes, and ensure long-term stability for His people, reflecting a holistic view of justice that considers both individual rights and communal well-being.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • Inheritance (Hebrew, nachălâh', H5159): This term refers to something inherited, an occupancy, or concretely, an heirloom; generally an estate, patrimony, or portion. In this context, it signifies the divinely allotted land, a permanent endowment foundational to Israelite identity and covenantal blessing. The repeated use underscores the deep concern for its preservation.
  • Taken (Hebrew, gâraʻ', H1639): Meaning to scrape off, by implication to shave, remove, lessen, or withhold. Here, it denotes the act of diminishing or removing the inheritance from its original tribal allotment, highlighting the severe consequence of inter-tribal marriage for inheriting daughters.
  • Lot (Hebrew, gôwrâl', H1486): Properly a pebble, i.e., a lot (small stones being used for that purpose); figuratively, a portion or destiny (as if determined by lot). In the context of land distribution, it emphasizes the divine and fixed nature of the allocation, making the tribal boundaries sacred and inviolable.

Verse Breakdown

  • "And if they be married to any of the sons of the [other] tribes of the children of Israel,": This clause sets the condition for the subsequent consequence. It addresses the specific scenario where daughters who had inherited land would marry outside their own tribe, an act that, while permissible, carried significant implications for land tenure. The parenthetical "[other]" in the KJV clarifies that the concern is inter-tribal marriage, not simply marriage in general.
  • "then shall their inheritance be taken from the inheritance of our fathers,": This is the direct consequence of the inter-tribal marriage. The land inherited by the daughters, which was originally part of their father's tribal allotment, would no longer remain within that tribe. This highlights the patrilineal nature of land ownership and tribal affiliation in ancient Israel, where a woman's inheritance would typically merge with her husband's family and tribe.
  • "and shall be put to the inheritance of the tribe whereunto they are received:": This further clarifies the destination of the transferred inheritance. The land would become part of the tribal allotment of the husband's tribe, effectively increasing that tribe's portion at the expense of the original tribe. This directly addresses the concern raised by the elders of Manasseh, who feared the diminishment of their tribal territory.
  • "so shall it be taken from the lot of our inheritance.": This concluding phrase reiterates and emphasizes the core problem: the permanent removal of land from the original tribal "lot" or divinely apportioned share. The repetition reinforces the seriousness of the situation and the necessity of the legal provision to maintain the integrity of the tribal boundaries as God had established them.

Literary Devices

Numbers 36:3 employs several literary devices to convey its legal and theological weight. The most prominent is Legal Language, characterized by its precise, conditional structure ("And if... then shall..."). This clear cause-and-effect phrasing is typical of ancient Near Eastern legal codes and highlights the definitive nature of the ruling. Repetition is also a key device, particularly the repeated use of "inheritance" and phrases like "shall be taken from the inheritance" and "shall it be taken from the lot of our inheritance." This repetition serves to emphasize the central concern of the passage: the preservation of tribal land and the severe consequence of its transfer. The structure of the verse itself demonstrates Emphasis by placing the condition first, followed by the explicit, multi-faceted consequences, leaving no ambiguity about the law's intent.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

The specific ruling in Numbers 36:3, while addressing a unique situation of land inheritance in ancient Israel, resonates with broader theological principles concerning God's sovereignty, order, and justice. The careful preservation of tribal boundaries reflects God's meticulous design for His people and His desire for stability and identity within the community. It underscores the idea that God is a God of order, who establishes clear parameters for the well-being of His creation, whether in the physical distribution of land or the moral framework for human flourishing. This divine concern for maintaining distinct boundaries and ensuring equitable distribution of resources, even in the face of evolving social dynamics, speaks to a deeper principle of stewardship and the careful management of what God has entrusted to humanity. The land, as God's gift, was not to be treated lightly or haphazardly but to be stewarded according to His divine plan, ensuring that future generations would also benefit from their rightful portion.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

While the specific context of tribal land inheritance is unique to ancient Israel, the underlying principles of Numbers 36:3 offer timeless lessons for contemporary believers. This passage reminds us that God values order, boundaries, and the preservation of identity within His community. It challenges us to consider how our individual choices, particularly in relationships and the management of resources, can have ripple effects on the wider community of faith and the legacy we leave. We are called to be faithful stewards of the spiritual and material "inheritance" God has entrusted to us, understanding that these blessings are not merely for personal gain but for the flourishing of the body of Christ and the advancement of God's kingdom. Just as the Israelites were to protect their physical inheritance, we are to guard our spiritual inheritance in Christ, ensuring that our lives reflect the divine order and justice that God desires for His people.

Questions for Reflection

  • How does the emphasis on preserving tribal boundaries in ancient Israel inform our understanding of the importance of order and clear "boundaries" within the church or our personal lives today?
  • In what ways are we called to be faithful stewards of the "inheritance" God has given us, whether it be spiritual gifts, financial resources, or relationships?
  • How do our personal choices, particularly concerning marriage or partnerships, impact the spiritual "inheritance" and well-being of our families and the broader Christian community?
  • Beyond physical land, what does it mean to have a "spiritual inheritance" in Christ, and how should this understanding shape our priorities and actions?

FAQ

Why was this law necessary, and did it limit women's rights?

Answer: This law was necessary to prevent the disruption of the divinely ordained tribal land boundaries. God had meticulously allocated land to each tribe by lot, and these boundaries were considered sacred and perpetual. The unique ruling in Numbers 27 granted Zelophehad's daughters the right to inherit their father's land in the absence of sons, which was a progressive move for its time. However, this created a potential problem: if these daughters married men from other tribes, their inherited land would eventually transfer to their husbands' tribes, diminishing the original tribe's portion. Numbers 36:3 provided a solution to balance the individual right of inheritance for women with the overarching communal need to preserve tribal land integrity. While it placed a restriction on the marriage choices of inheriting daughters (they had to marry within their own tribe, as clarified in Numbers 36:6), it was a response to an already innovative law, ensuring the long-term stability and identity of the tribal system.

Does this ancient law about land inheritance apply to Christians today?

Answer: Directly, the specific legal provisions regarding tribal land inheritance in Numbers 36:3 do not apply to Christians today, as we are not organized into literal tribes with physical land allotments in the Promised Land. However, the underlying principles offer profound spiritual and practical application. The passage highlights God's value for order, stewardship, and the preservation of identity within His community. For believers, this translates to being faithful stewards of the spiritual inheritance we have in Christ (e.g., Ephesians 1:11), understanding that our individual choices can impact the wider body of Christ, and recognizing the importance of maintaining spiritual "boundaries" that protect our faith and community. It encourages us to live in a way that honors God's established order and contributes to the well-being of His people.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

While Numbers 36:3 deals with the very tangible issue of land inheritance in ancient Israel, its underlying themes point forward to the ultimate inheritance found in Christ. The meticulous care with which God ensured the preservation of tribal land foreshadows the perfect and incorruptible spiritual inheritance believers receive through Jesus. Just as the land was God's gift to Israel, Christ himself is the ultimate gift, and in Him, we receive an inheritance that "can never perish, spoil or fade" (1 Peter 1:4). The concern for maintaining tribal boundaries reflects God's desire for order and belonging, a desire perfectly fulfilled in the Church, the body of Christ, where believers from every "tribe and language and people and nation" (Revelation 5:9) are united in Him, becoming "fellow heirs with Christ" (Romans 8:17). Jesus, the true Son, ensures that the "inheritance" of God's people is not diminished or lost, but rather secured eternally through His atoning work and resurrection, granting us a place in the heavenly kingdom and a share in His glorious reign (Colossians 1:12). He is the one who upholds the divine order, bringing true justice, belonging, and an eternal dwelling place for all who believe.

Copy as

Commentary on Numbers 36 verses 1–4

We have here the humble address which the heads of the tribe of Manasseh made to Moses and the princes, on occasion of the order lately made concerning the daughters of Zelophehad. The family they belonged to was part of that half of the tribe of Manasseh which we yet to have their lot within Jordan, not that half that was already settled; and yet they speak of the land of their possession, and the inheritance of their fathers, with as great assurance as if they had it already in their hands, knowing whom they had trusted. In their appeal observe, 1. They fairly recite the former order made in this case, and do not move to have that set aside, but are very willing to acquiesce in it (Num 36:2): The Lord commanded to give the inheritance of Zelophehad to his daughters; and they are very well pleased that it should be so, none of them knowing but that hereafter it might be the case of their own families, and then their daughters would have the benefit of this law. 2. They represent the inconvenience which might, possibly, follow hereupon, if the daughters of Zelophehad should see cause to marry into any other tribes, Num 36:3. And it is probable that this was not a bare surmise, or supposition, but that they knew, at this time, great court was made to them by some young gentlemen of other tribes, because they were heiresses, that they might get footing in this tribe, and so enlarge their own inheritance. This truly is often aimed at more than it should be in making marriages, not the meetness of the person, but the convenience of the estate, to lay house to house, and field to field. Wisdom indeed is good with an inheritance; but what is an inheritance good for in that relation without wisdom? But here, we may presume, the personal merit of these daughters recommended them as well as their fortunes; however, the heads of their tribe foresaw the mischief that would follow, and brought the case to Moses, that he might consult the oracle of God concerning it. The difficulty they start God could have obviated and provided against in the former order given in this case; but to teach us that we must, in our affairs, not only attend God's providence, but make use of our own prudence, God did not direct in it till the themselves that were concerned wisely foresaw the inconvenience, and piously applied to Moses for a rule in it. For though they were chief fathers in their families, and might have assumed a power to overrule these daughters of Zelophehad in disposing of themselves, especially their father being dead and the common interest of their tribe being concerned in it, yet they chose rather to refer the matter to Moses, and it issued well. We should not covet to be judges in our own case, for it is difficult to be so without being partial. It is easier in many cases to take good advice than to give it, and it is a satisfaction to be under direction. Two things they aimed at in their representation: - (1.) To preserve the divine appointment of inheritances. They urged the command (Num 36:2), that the land should be given by lot to the respective tribes, and urged that it would break in upon the divine appointment if such a considerable part of the lot of Manasseh should, by their marriage, be transferred to any other tribe; for the issue would be denominated from the father's tribe, not the mother's. This indeed would not lessen the lot of the particular persons of that tribe (they would have their own still), but it would lessen the lot of the tribe in general, and render it less strong and considerable; they therefore thought themselves concerned for the reputation of their tribe, and perhaps were the more jealous for it because it was already very much weakened by the sitting down of the one half of it on this side Jordan. (2.) To prevent contests and quarrels among posterity. If those of other tribes should come among them perhaps it might occasion some contests. They would be apt to give and receive disturbance, and their title might, in process of time, come to be questioned; and how great a matter would this fire kindle! It is the wisdom and duty of those that have estates in the world to settle them, and dispose of them, so as that no strife and contention may arise about them among posterity.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 1–4. Public domain.
Copy as
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Numbers 36:3 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

Read & Compare

Commentaries

Original Language & Research

Sermons, Hymns & Audio

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.