Numbers 36:4

Translation
King James Version
And when the jubile of the children of Israel shall be, then shall their inheritance be put unto the inheritance of the tribe whereunto they are received: so shall their inheritance be taken away from the inheritance of the tribe of our fathers.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
And when the jubile H3104 of the children H1121 of Israel H3478 shall be, then shall their inheritance H5159 be put H3254 unto the inheritance H5159 of the tribe H4294 whereunto they are received: so shall their inheritance H5159 be taken away H1639 from the inheritance H5159 of the tribe H4294 of our fathers H1.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
And when the yovel of the people of Isra'el comes, their inheritance will be added to the land possessed by the tribe they will then belong to and be subtracted from the inheritance belonging to the tribe of our ancestors."
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
And when the Jubilee for the Israelites comes, their inheritance will be added to the tribe into which they marry and taken away from the tribe of our fathers.”
Ask
American Standard Version
And when the jubilee of the children of Israel shall be, then will their inheritance be added unto the inheritance of the tribe whereunto they shall belong: so will their inheritance be taken away from the inheritance of the tribe of our fathers.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
When the jubilee of the children of Israel shall be, then will their inheritance be added to the inheritance of the tribe to which they shall belong. So their inheritance will be taken away from the inheritance of the tribe of our fathers.”
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
Also when the Iubile of the children of Israel commeth, then shall their inheritance be put vnto the inheritance of the tribe whereof they shall be: so shall their inheritance be taken away from the inheritance of the tribe of our fathers.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
and if it is the jubilee of the sons of Israel, then hath their inheritance been added to the inheritance of the tribe which is theirs, and from the inheritance of the tribe of our fathers is their inheritance withdrawn.'
Ask
See also
Isaiah 61:2Leviticus 25:10Leviticus 25:18Leviticus 25:23Luke 4:18Luke 4:19
In the KJVVerse 4,884 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

Numbers 36:4 addresses a critical legal and theological challenge concerning land inheritance for daughters in ancient Israel, particularly in light of the Year of Jubilee. This verse stipulates that if daughters who had inherited land in the absence of sons were to marry outside their ancestral tribe, their inherited property would, upon the arrival of the Jubilee, be permanently transferred to the tribe of their husbands. This outcome would effectively diminish the original land allocation of their father's tribe, highlighting a tension between individual inheritance rights and the divinely ordained preservation of tribal land boundaries within the promised land.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: Numbers 36:4 is positioned at the conclusion of the book of Numbers, serving as the resolution to a significant legal development that began earlier in the narrative. The foundational issue was raised by the daughters of Zelophehad in Numbers 27:1-11, who, having no brothers, petitioned Moses for the right to inherit their deceased father's land. God affirmed their plea, establishing a precedent for female inheritance. However, this new ruling presented a potential dilemma for the meticulous tribal land distribution. The leaders of the tribe of Manasseh, to which Zelophehad belonged, subsequently approached Moses, Eleazar, and the chiefs with their concern, articulated in Numbers 36:1-3. They feared that if these inheriting daughters married men from other tribes, their land would eventually be absorbed into the new tribe, thereby disrupting the divinely mandated tribal boundaries established for the land of Canaan. Verse 4 specifically introduces the Year of Jubilee as the pivotal moment when such a cross-tribal land transfer would become permanent and irreversible. The subsequent verses, Numbers 36:5-9, then present God's inspired solution to this conundrum: inheriting daughters must marry within their own clan and tribe to prevent the loss of land from their ancestral inheritance.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: Land inheritance was not merely an economic matter in ancient Israel; it was foundational to their identity, their covenant relationship with God, and their social structure. The land of Canaan was a direct, tangible gift from Yahweh, meticulously divided among the twelve tribes by lot, as detailed in the book of Joshua, particularly from Joshua 13 through Joshua 19. Each tribe, clan, and family received a specific, inalienable portion, symbolizing their permanent stake in God's covenant promises and their identity as God's people. The Hebrew term for "inheritance," nachalah, carried profound theological weight, representing a lasting legacy and an enduring connection to the covenant God made with Abraham. The Year of Jubilee, outlined in Leviticus 25, was a unique institution occurring every fifty years. Its primary purpose was to prevent the permanent alienation of land and to restore it to its original tribal and family owners, ensuring social and economic equity, preventing the concentration of wealth, and reaffirming God's ultimate ownership of the land. In this context, the concern of the Manassite leaders was not trivial; it was about preserving the integrity of God's divine land distribution and the distinct identity of their tribe, which the Jubilee was designed to protect, but which, paradoxically, could solidify an unintended and undesirable transfer in this specific scenario.
  • Key Themes: Numbers 36:4 significantly contributes to several overarching themes within the Pentateuch and the broader Old Testament narrative. Firstly, it powerfully underscores the Preservation of Tribal Inheritance and Identity. The meticulous laws surrounding land ownership reflect God's profound desire for order, stability, and the maintenance of distinct tribal identities within the nation of Israel. The land was not merely property; it was a foundational element of their covenant relationship, their national existence, and their unique place among the nations. Secondly, the verse highlights the intricate Significance and Paradox of the Jubilee. While the Jubilee (Hebrew: yôwbêl) was primarily conceived as a year of restoration, returning land to its original owners as mandated in Leviticus 25:13, Numbers 36:4 reveals a nuanced scenario where, without divine intervention, it would have the counterintuitive effect of solidifying a cross-tribal land transfer. This demonstrates the detailed and comprehensive nature of God's law, addressing potential conflicts and unforeseen implications between different legal principles. Thirdly, this legislative episode illustrates Divine Order and Justice. God's foresight in providing a specific solution (mandating intra-tribal marriage for inheriting daughters, as revealed in Numbers 36:6) demonstrates His meticulous concern for both individual justice (affirming the daughters' right to inherit) and communal order (preserving the integrity of tribal boundaries). This legislative process reflects God's profound wisdom in balancing competing claims and ensuring the long-term well-being and covenant faithfulness of His people.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • Jubile (Hebrew, yôwbêl', H3104): This term refers to the fiftieth year, which was to be proclaimed throughout the land by the blowing of a ram's horn trumpet. As outlined in Leviticus 25, it was a year of profound liberation and restoration, during which all Israelite slaves were freed, and all land sold or mortgaged since the previous Jubilee was returned to its original family and tribal owners. The paradox highlighted in Numbers 36:4 is that this very institution, designed to prevent permanent land alienation and ensure its return to the original family, would, in the case of inheriting daughters marrying outside their tribe, solidify the transfer of land to the husband's tribe, thus permanently "taking away" from the original tribal inheritance.
  • Inheritance (Hebrew, nachălâh', H5159): More than simply "property" or "possession," nachălâh signifies "something inherited," an "allotment," "heritage," or "possession received by lot or by divine distribution." It carries deep covenantal connotations, referring to the land promised by God to Abraham's descendants and specifically allotted to each tribe and family. It was considered an inalienable gift from God, intended to be passed down through generations as a perpetual possession. The central concern in Numbers 36:4 is the potential "taking away" or diminution of this divinely ordained nachălâh from the ancestral tribe, thereby undermining the sacred principle of maintaining tribal land boundaries.
  • Taken away (Hebrew, gâraʻ', H1639): This verb, derived from a primitive root, means "to scrape off," and by implication, "to shave, remove, lessen, withhold," or "to diminish." In this context, it powerfully conveys the grave concern of the Manassite leaders that their tribal nachălâh would be permanently reduced or lost to another tribe if their inheriting daughters married outside their own. It underscores the perceived threat to the integrity and permanence of their God-given land portion, which was meant to be an enduring legacy.

Verse Breakdown

  • "And when the jubile of the children of Israel shall be,": This opening clause establishes the critical temporal setting for the legal consequence that follows. The Year of Jubilee, a divinely ordained fifty-year cycle of restoration and re-establishment, is identified as the precise moment when the potential land transfer would become permanent. This highlights the profound legal and theological significance of this specific year within Israelite society, serving as a fixed point for the resolution of land disputes.
  • "then shall their inheritance be put unto the inheritance of the tribe whereunto they are received:": This clause articulates the direct consequence of an inheriting daughter marrying into a tribe other than her own. Her inherited land, which was originally part of her father's ancestral tribal allotment, would effectively be "put unto" or absorbed into the land inheritance of her husband's tribe. This is the core problem identified by the Manassite leaders – a direct challenge to the fundamental principle of maintaining distinct and unalterable tribal land boundaries.
  • "so shall their inheritance be taken away from the inheritance of the tribe of our fathers.": This final clause expresses the outcome from the perspective of the original tribe. The land, which was an integral part of their ancestral heritage ("the tribe of our fathers"), would be permanently "taken away" or diminished. This emphasizes the profound concern for the long-term integrity, stability, and divinely apportioned boundaries of each tribe's land, underscoring the perceived loss and disruption to their covenantal inheritance.

Literary Devices

Numbers 36:4 primarily employs Legal Language and Repetition. The verse is meticulously structured as a clear legal stipulation, presenting a conditional clause ("And when the jubile... shall be") followed by its direct and unavoidable consequence ("then shall their inheritance be put... so shall their inheritance be taken away"). This precise, conditional phrasing is characteristic of Mosaic law, designed for clarity, certainty, and the prevention of ambiguity in matters of land and inheritance. The prominent Repetition of the word "inheritance" (nachălâh) three times within this single verse ("their inheritance," "the inheritance of the tribe," "the inheritance of the tribe of our fathers") serves to powerfully emphasize the central concern. This reiteration underscores the inestimable value, theological significance, and inalienable nature of the land allotment, highlighting the gravity of its potential transfer and diminution from the ancestral tribe. Furthermore, the verse clearly demonstrates Cause and Effect, directly linking the arrival of the Jubilee year to the permanent transfer of the land and its subsequent "taking away" from the original tribe, thereby articulating the legal mechanism by which the feared outcome would occur.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

This seemingly obscure legal detail in Numbers 36:4 reveals profound theological principles about God's character and His meticulous relationship with His covenant people. It demonstrates God's unwavering commitment to order, justice, and the preservation of identity within His community. The divine concern for maintaining tribal boundaries reflects a deeper truth: God is a God of order, not chaos, and He provides intricate structures for the flourishing and stability of His people. The land inheritance was not merely an economic asset but a tangible sign of God's faithfulness to His covenant promises and the very foundation of Israel's national and spiritual identity. This law, therefore, underscores the sacredness of God's gifts and the paramount importance of stewarding them according to His divine design, ensuring that the blessings intended for one generation would not be inadvertently lost to the next or diverted from their intended recipients. It speaks to the enduring nature of God's promises and His desire for His people to live securely within the boundaries He has established.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

While the specific context of tribal land inheritance in ancient Israel is geographically and culturally distant from modern societies, the underlying principles embedded in Numbers 36:4 remain profoundly relevant for contemporary believers. This passage invites us to deeply reflect on the importance of divine boundaries, faithful stewardship, and the long-term, generational implications of our decisions. Just as God meticulously ordered the land for Israel, He calls us to live lives of order, intentionality, and wisdom, honoring the "boundaries" He has set for us, whether in our relationships, our finances, our ethical choices, or our spiritual disciplines. It powerfully reminds us that our "inheritance" – encompassing spiritual gifts, material resources, family legacies, and even our very lives – is a sacred trust from God, meant to be stewarded wisely, preserved diligently, and passed on faithfully. We are called to consider not only immediate gains or personal desires but also the enduring impact of our choices on future generations, ensuring that what God has given us is preserved, multiplied, and utilized for His glory and the good of those who come after us. This passage also prompts us to appreciate God's detailed care for justice and fairness, even in complex and nuanced situations, encouraging us to seek His divine wisdom in navigating our own ethical and relational dilemmas, trusting in His perfect design.

Questions for Reflection

  • What "inheritance" – whether spiritual gifts, relational connections, or material resources – has God entrusted to me, and how am I actively stewarding it with a long-term, generational perspective?
  • Where in my life might I be inadvertently allowing "boundaries" (spiritual, relational, or ethical) to erode, potentially leading to a "taking away" from what God intends to preserve and bless?
  • How does God's meticulous attention to detail and His provision of a solution in this ancient law encourage me to seek His wisdom in the seemingly small or complex decisions of my own life?
  • In what tangible ways can I honor the "heritage" passed down to me, whether from my family, my community, or my faith tradition, and actively work to ensure its integrity and flourishing for those who come after me?

FAQ

Why was the Jubilee, a year of restoration, seen as a problem in this specific case?

Answer: The Jubilee was divinely designed to prevent the permanent alienation of land and to ensure its return to its original tribal and family owners every fifty years, thereby maintaining the integrity of the initial land distribution. However, in the unique case of inheriting daughters who married outside their ancestral tribe, the land they brought with them would, upon the Jubilee, become permanently affixed to their husband's tribe. This meant that instead of restoring the land to the original tribe of the daughter's father, the Jubilee would paradoxically solidify its transfer to the new tribe, thereby diminishing the original tribe's divinely apportioned inheritance. The problem was not with the Jubilee itself, but its unintended consequence on cross-tribal marriages for inheriting daughters, which would have permanently altered the God-ordained tribal boundaries. The divine solution, found in Numbers 36:6 and later exemplified in Numbers 36:10-12, was for these daughters to marry within their own clan and tribe, thus ensuring the land remained within its original tribal inheritance.

What was the ultimate outcome for the daughters of Zelophehad?

Answer: The daughters of Zelophehad – Mahlah, Tirzah, Hoglah, Milcah, and Noah – faithfully obeyed the divine command conveyed through Moses. Numbers 36:10-12 explicitly records that "they were married unto their father's brothers' sons," meaning they married within their own clan (the families of the sons of Manasseh, son of Joseph). This act of obedience ensured that their inherited land remained securely within the tribe of Manasseh, thereby preserving the integrity of the tribal land boundaries exactly as God intended. Their actions demonstrated not only their right to inherit but also their commitment to the communal responsibility of maintaining the divine order for the land of Israel.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

While Numbers 36:4 meticulously addresses the temporal and physical inheritance of land in ancient Israel, it profoundly foreshadows a greater, spiritual inheritance found exclusively in Jesus Christ. The meticulous care with which God protected the tribal land boundaries and ensured the permanence of inheritance points to the ultimate security and incorruptible nature of the inheritance believers receive in Christ. Just as the Jubilee brought restoration, freedom, and the return of land, Jesus Christ is our ultimate Jubilee, proclaiming liberty to the captives and bringing us into a permanent, inalienable inheritance that can never be "taken away" or diminished. Through His atoning work on the cross and His glorious resurrection, we are "made heirs of God and joint heirs with Christ" (Romans 8:17), receiving "an inheritance incorruptible, and undefiled, and that fades not away, reserved in heaven for you" (1 Peter 1:4). The deep concern for tribal identity and belonging in the Old Testament finds its ultimate fulfillment in the new spiritual family of God, the Church, where in Christ, all earthly distinctions are transcended, for there is "neither Jew nor Gentile, neither slave nor free, nor is there male and female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus" (Galatians 3:28). Our ultimate dwelling and permanent inheritance are not in a physical land allotment, but in the new heavens and new earth, a glorious and eternal reality where Christ reigns, and we dwell with Him forever (Revelation 21:1-7).

Copy as

Commentary on Numbers 36 verses 1–4

We have here the humble address which the heads of the tribe of Manasseh made to Moses and the princes, on occasion of the order lately made concerning the daughters of Zelophehad. The family they belonged to was part of that half of the tribe of Manasseh which we yet to have their lot within Jordan, not that half that was already settled; and yet they speak of the land of their possession, and the inheritance of their fathers, with as great assurance as if they had it already in their hands, knowing whom they had trusted. In their appeal observe, 1. They fairly recite the former order made in this case, and do not move to have that set aside, but are very willing to acquiesce in it (Num 36:2): The Lord commanded to give the inheritance of Zelophehad to his daughters; and they are very well pleased that it should be so, none of them knowing but that hereafter it might be the case of their own families, and then their daughters would have the benefit of this law. 2. They represent the inconvenience which might, possibly, follow hereupon, if the daughters of Zelophehad should see cause to marry into any other tribes, Num 36:3. And it is probable that this was not a bare surmise, or supposition, but that they knew, at this time, great court was made to them by some young gentlemen of other tribes, because they were heiresses, that they might get footing in this tribe, and so enlarge their own inheritance. This truly is often aimed at more than it should be in making marriages, not the meetness of the person, but the convenience of the estate, to lay house to house, and field to field. Wisdom indeed is good with an inheritance; but what is an inheritance good for in that relation without wisdom? But here, we may presume, the personal merit of these daughters recommended them as well as their fortunes; however, the heads of their tribe foresaw the mischief that would follow, and brought the case to Moses, that he might consult the oracle of God concerning it. The difficulty they start God could have obviated and provided against in the former order given in this case; but to teach us that we must, in our affairs, not only attend God's providence, but make use of our own prudence, God did not direct in it till the themselves that were concerned wisely foresaw the inconvenience, and piously applied to Moses for a rule in it. For though they were chief fathers in their families, and might have assumed a power to overrule these daughters of Zelophehad in disposing of themselves, especially their father being dead and the common interest of their tribe being concerned in it, yet they chose rather to refer the matter to Moses, and it issued well. We should not covet to be judges in our own case, for it is difficult to be so without being partial. It is easier in many cases to take good advice than to give it, and it is a satisfaction to be under direction. Two things they aimed at in their representation: - (1.) To preserve the divine appointment of inheritances. They urged the command (Num 36:2), that the land should be given by lot to the respective tribes, and urged that it would break in upon the divine appointment if such a considerable part of the lot of Manasseh should, by their marriage, be transferred to any other tribe; for the issue would be denominated from the father's tribe, not the mother's. This indeed would not lessen the lot of the particular persons of that tribe (they would have their own still), but it would lessen the lot of the tribe in general, and render it less strong and considerable; they therefore thought themselves concerned for the reputation of their tribe, and perhaps were the more jealous for it because it was already very much weakened by the sitting down of the one half of it on this side Jordan. (2.) To prevent contests and quarrels among posterity. If those of other tribes should come among them perhaps it might occasion some contests. They would be apt to give and receive disturbance, and their title might, in process of time, come to be questioned; and how great a matter would this fire kindle! It is the wisdom and duty of those that have estates in the world to settle them, and dispose of them, so as that no strife and contention may arise about them among posterity.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 1–4. Public domain.
Copy as
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Numbers 36:4 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

Read & Compare

Commentaries

Original Language & Research

Sermons, Hymns & Audio

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.